Which Sony 24-70mm lens should you buy for Full-Frame? Buying Guide 2018
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июн 2018
- Which 24-70mm Sony lens should you buy for your full-frame camera in 2018? This video is a buyer guide going through the various lens choices available today. Links to the lenses below🔽🔽🔽
BUY CAPTURE ONE
Link:www.phaseone.com/en/Online-St...
Voucher Code: AMBDANNY
Sony 28-70 F3.5-5.6
AMZ: geni.us/YSpL | B&H: bhpho.to/2JnfjOU
Sony 24-70 F4 Zeiss
AMZ: geni.us/35qFR | B&H: bhpho.to/2JVWClk
Sony 24-105 F4 OSS
AMZ: geni.us/En0crQB | B&H: bhpho.to/2Hygmus
Tamron 28-75mm
AMZ: geni.us/QrA4rn | B&H: bhpho.to/2r4Acaf
Sony 24-70GM
AMZ: geni.us/eeXRGnL | B&H: bhpho.to/2JiHaUh
Sigma MC-11 Adapter
AMZ: geni.us/yOlBC | B&H: bhpho.to/2hPCglp
BUY CAPTURE ONE
Link:www.phaseone.com/en/Online-St...
Voucher Code: AMBDANNY
MY KIT
✅My Sony Sports Photography Gear: geni.us/EkwX
✅My Favorite Sony Accessories: geni.us/chNwEv
✅My RUclips Film Kit: geni.us/h1x8
✅My LiveStream Kit: geni.us/ahXrxn
Affiliate Disclaimer: Most if not all links mentioned in the description are affiliate links for Amazon and possibly B&H Photo Video.
LET’S CONNECT! (Ask me questions)
Instagram: geni.us/wwF9
Facebook: geni.us/yBa0AK
Twitter: geni.us/dW0PDH
WEBSITE
www.that1cameraguy.com
Business Inquiry
that1cameraguy@gmail.com
This was really helpful! I just purchases the a7 III and I’ve been researching the various zoom lenses quite a bit. The explanations and comparisons made here really helped me. Moving away from my original choice of FE 24-70mm Zeiss and getting the FE 24-105mm G.
Thank you for that in depth review on all the lenses! I am so "WOWED" by the amount of information.
Thank you for this video.....its the most comprehensive one out there!
Ah! At last!! I was eagerly waiting just for this video mate - thanks much :)
Currently loving my 24-105 lens. Great for landscape and events.
Thanks for the info, I'm going to get the Tamron.
Thanks for the video. The 24-105 f4 Its just amazing
Thanks! Been waiting for someone to do this comparison
Some good info here although I must say that with todays bodies an f/4 aperture really isn't that big of a setback anymore. 5-10 years ago losing a stop of light would have been a huge deal but now it's very easy to make that up with IBIS (slower shutter speed) or higher ISO that still produces incredible images. Bokeh would certainly be better at f/2.8 but if someone wants great bokeh they should be looking into primes.
Thank you Danny. Excellent choice of a review topic. It’s timely and very useful. Well done, too. I placed my order for the Sony 24-105mm after noodling all your good info. I use primes, Batis 25 f/2 and Sony’s 50 f/1.8 & 85f/1.8, for lowlight and bokeh. Tamron’s size and f/2.8 are indeed compelling reasons to own it as well.
Great video, thanks for the info. Came in time for my A73 purchase and helped me make up my mind on the lens.
Wooow this was an amazing review thank you so much. If I can get a hold of the Canon 24 70 I will but that one. If by THEN the tamron fix the issue of focusing I'll jump on that one instead. Thank you so much!
This was great! Thanks, Danny!!
Would love to see a similar idea for the apsc format. I love shooting nature and apsc gives me that extra range without breaking the bank of specialized lenses
great info
I agree! For the super budget conscious, the kit Sony 24-70mm is a wonderful lens. I did get the Sony Zeiss 24-70 f4 and though it was a bit better, it wasn't worth the extra cost. I then went through a number of prime Rokinons until I got the Sony 24-105mm. I love it! Better color rendition and so much sharper than the other lenses I had bought.
Thanks for your reviews here. I love my 24-105mm and am part of Sony Pro support, so I will stick to my Sony glass for now. Cheers
i just got the 24-70mm gmaster and i took a few test shots. The corners seem to be a bit weak at 24 and 70 but at 35mm it was sharp. The center is sharp though. So was that blur on your shots the center? Or at the corners?
I got the kit lens and the 24-105mm which i am impressed with it's sharpness and overall quality. My next lens will either be the 90mm Macro or the 85mm 1.8. The 24-70 GM is out of my reach for now as I have other priorities for now.
Great guide 👍
StormRider2 you will love the 90mm macro. It is razor sharp. People rave about the 55 being sharp the 90 put resolves it. I have shit probably 10k portrait pictures with it! Also actual micro work it works great too!
The 85 1.8 is my favorite lens currently. Can't go wrong with it!
I can second the 90mm Macro as his next lens. It will depend on what he shoots, but it's amazing for macro, and produces super sharp portraits. The choice will be based on whether you value flexibility and sharpness over bokeh and low light performance.
How do you find 24-105? It's f/4 isn't it? I've been considering giving it a shot as it's much more affordable than 24-70 f/2.8 which is twice as much.... How sharp is it? Do you think you can get away without extra f-stop?
Kamil Glabik only you can decide whether you can get away without the extra stop. It all depends on what you shoot. As far as I have heard it’s a pretty sharp lens. Not used it personally tho.
glad i found your channel, I am using the Kit Lens for now and prolly for a while, but I love the reviews for my planning on next items.
Excellent and detailed review 👊🏻
OMG I didn't get an alert for this posting! This was a great buying guide to help me to understand what I "need" vs what "I want". Thanks buddy, keeping my 24-105 and maybe add on the 12-24 f4 or get a 16-35 in f4 or f2.8.
i have read many reviews and most of them state that 24-105 f4 is an excellent lenses except its price.
Hongze Wu I have used my 24-105 to shoot basketball and it nails it with the autofocus. Tracks really well, the only issues are when there’s a fast break and I plan ahead and it has to find what to put in focus. This is shooting 4K 30fps f8 and focus is set to wide.
thanks, what do you mean by "fast break and I plan ahead"" :D
Fast break is the term for basketball when the player with the ball is ahead of everyone at a fast pace. Think of a runner in a sprint and trying to track them.
I have the 16-35 F4. Wish I could have gotten the 2.8 but it was about double the price.
Thanks for the informative video!
Thanks for your help! I ended up buying the 24-105. It is a killer all-around lens for a first buy. Since i upgraded from a crop-body, the depth of field is very similar to a 2.8 on a crop body.
What camera are you using? Isn't that lens too heavy to carry all day? Thanks in advance.
Rodrigo P.C. I'm using an a7iii. Coming from an 80d w/ 17-55mm it is light to me😂
My starting lens as well for the A73
I like your style and enjoy your videos. Great content! Thank you. New subscriber.
Thanks for breaking it down. Sony is a whole other new system for me and so I'm having to go back to basics and learn everything I can about it and its lens. 😅🙌🏾
Thanks for the great overview!!
Fantastic review, clear precise and the best thing is it has made me sit back and reconsider a purchase I was going to make today! (That being the Sony 24-105mm 3.5-5.6 OSS ) I will perform a few more tests with what I have before I rush out and buy. I have the 24-70mm Sony kit lens for my Sony A7iii and a Nikon 14-24mm f2.8, the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 and a adapter which allows most of the modes including Autofocus and the main features. The two Nikon lenses do struggle in low light with the adapter to focus, in that they sometimes search and I miss valuable images but other than that they are quick and VERY sharp. Thanks again!!!! ;-)
I shoot w the 24-70 GM on my a7Sii and it’s a work horse! I’ve shot several concerts, filmed several interviews both using it as 30mm for A-cam and 70mm for B-cam, as well as a lot of event b-roll (paired on zhiyun crane v2 it maxes out the cranes weight). Save up enough to buy the GM you won’t need another lens for a while
Kenan Convey I’ve been looking up this lens the last couple days... I have been starting to do some weddings and was tired of switching lenses back and forth.. Would you recommend this lens...
Dvchavero I would! I’ve only shot one wedding on it but I use it for live events all the time. That medium 24-70 focal length is perfect for run and gun shooting where you don’t have time to swap lenses. And it’s just as sharp as my 28mm f/1.8.
Kenan Convey Awesome. And thank you for the quick feed back!!
Put the variable aperture lens at f5.6 and you get fixed exposure through the whole range.
I am fortunate that I have not had any focusing issues with Tamron 28-70mm f2.8. I have the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 Art lens which I have adapted to my a7rii. The weight makes the camera very front heavy. Great video!
Bao Nguyen probably you got a good copy, on what body are you using the tamron?
semangatmembara , I am hoping I have a good copy and there aren't any problems un the future. I've been using the Tamron on the a7rii.
I had the Tamron on my a7rii as well but it ended up with the Canon 24-70 2.8 II, also a great second value.
And now I’m on the a7iii and works perfect.
Mikael Schatz did you return the lens? I'm going to use it for a another photo shoot and see if it works. My last session made me guess if it was in focus. The color saturation was a bit too much and the constant uncertainty of it grabbing focus made it frustrating. I know I can fix the saturation in post but being able to present sooc would be nice.
I'll be sending the lens back if this upcoming session doesn't give me the results I'm hoping for.
Bao Nguyen ofc man, these things a ridiculously expensive!
I don’t know if I did the right choice but so far I’m satisfied , it’s more expensive but after all, it’s Canon.
Another thing for me was that the Tamron has Vc and that’s probably why the weight is about 100g more then the Canon.
Those grams are important for me when I put it on the gimbal.
I had it for 48h before I returned it so I don’t think I can say that I have fully tested it.
My two cents: For your next lens comparison video, don’t tell us, show us (images).
Good luck.
very good two cents my friend, but you are at the wrong youtube channel if you want more show. this is a tell youtube channel, that is why while i watch it on and off, i cannot bring myself to subscribe.
talking head videos are meant to be this way. since there is nothing to show, i usually use such videos to help me dose off. lovely voice.
disagree because a picture has a lot to do with 100 other factors that you would not account for, like time of the day, lighting, model, location, so you can have a shit picture taken in the g master and a better picture taken in the kit lens if you aren't perfect. So it'll only confuse you. But here you get the details in technology which shows you it's capacity.
The guy is erudite. Very listenable. I'd lose the 1 thing, it's too much That Nikon Guy. A kissing cousin(figure of speech) of the Canadian guy that jumped ship. @@Moghster
If it’s picture example you after you find tons on the net. Be thankful for what you get for free instead of complaining over what you don’t get.
For those interested in comparing samples, check out these links:
Sony 28-70 F3.5-5.6: www.goat.vision/?lens=28-70mm%20F3.5-5.6%20OSS
Sony 24-70 F4 Zeiss: www.goat.vision/?lens=FE%2024-70mm%20F4%20ZA%20OSS
Sony 24-105 F4 OSS: www.goat.vision/?lens=24-105mm%20F4%20OSS
Tamron 28-75mm: www.goat.vision/?lens=TAMRON%20SP%2028-75mm%20F%2F2.8%20Di%20A09E
Sony 24-70GM: www.goat.vision/?lens=FE%2024-70mm%20F2.8%20GM
Sigma MC-11 Adapter on a sigma 50mm: www.goat.vision/?lens=Sigma%2050mm%20f%2F1.4%20DG%20HSM%20%7C%20A%20014%20%2B%20MC-11
I've had the Tamron 28-75 for almost 2 weeks now. Took it with me to a 2 day photo workshop last week and have not had the reported focus issue yet. However, I'm not using it for video. So if the issue is only in video, it wouldn't have been a problem.
Thanks for your work man
Very nice video, man. It's easy to move from the kit lens to the Tamron, however once you've experienced 24 mm at the wide end, it becomes very difficult to move to 28 mm. Greetings from Brazil.
Great stuff thx for explaining
Great work! Love your chanel. I know how tought is it to grow a chanel.
I have the 24-105mm.f.4 and I love it :)
I am extremely happy with the 28-75mm f/2.8 Tamron on my A7iii camera. I shoot with an A6400 in tandem and will use a 12mm f/2 Rokinon lens (188 equivalent focal length) when I need wider coverage...
Great video! I have the 28-75 2.8 love it!! With a7iii!
This was so helpful! Interesting that Tony and Chelsea Northrup also use the A7III with a MC-11 and the canon 24-70! I have the canon 24-70 mark 1 and I am stuck trying to decide to let go of it or use it on the sony A7III. I might just get an MC-11 now! I'm worried about the auto focus a little but glad you guys found it useful!
amazing video as always
If I started over again I would probably get the 24-105mm for my first lens. I didn’t have too many options when I chose to go with Sony but I think that the zoom lens would be a good place to start. I would get the body and the zoom lens and just shoot and keep track of my exif data. Especially the focal lengths. After a while the data would give me a pretty good idea of what focal lengths I had been using the most. This would aid me later in deciding what lens to get and add to my kit.
littlerayblue That's true but I would instead use the kit lens and buy some prime soon after. The 24-105 is completely no sense price for a f4. It should be a 600/700
You should do some trending analysis to see what focal lengths you might be headed toward as well.
I just returned the 24-105 as it struggled to focus during two important photoshoots. I love the focal range, but unreliable focus is unacceptable.
yeah but also paying 1.3k for a f4 is unacceptable... I would so like to switch to sony but the lens price are just no sense and stop me doing that swith... pretty sad because sony body are the best and the most affordable
I bought the 24 - 105 f4 and although the lens is very expensive, the performance is truly superb, but your right, 800 / 900 would have been more acceptable
Would appreciate an updated lens guide for Sony a7iii or a retrospective of the tamron zooms for Sony FE? Please and thank you
hey just an idea for your lenses review, add the lens name you are currently talking about in a corner of the video so it is easier to look through the video to check for a particular lens.
In variable aperture lenses, I always shoot at the lowest F-stop that the lens can do at its farthest zoom.
That way when you zoom in and out, the exposure never changes
Excellent review comparison; I wish someone reviews Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 lens with Sigma MC11 on a Sony A7III..
I picked up the kit to use on a a5100. Works great for video, I am not a "zoomer" when shooting video. Usually use my gimbal instead. Hard to believe so many lenses in same focal length range.
Just what I needed..
Sony owns a 12% share within Tamron. This probably explains why the 28-75 works like a native lens, with the ability to update the lens firmware via the camera body. Additionally, it gives me confidence that Tamron will address any issues that can be fixed via firmware updates- like they’ve done so far. I can’t wait for a 16-35 and 70-200 FE mount from Tamron - they’ve applied for the patents already!
I saved money and went for the 24-105 f4 instead of the GM and bought the 55mm F1.8 as the prime is super sharp but I still have a very versatile travel zoom.
Which lense is best for event shooting hybrid...photo and video ? Thanks. 👍
Just today I did put the tamron in the a6500, extremely sharp and fast that combo, no as on the a7rii but very very sharp. I just needed to take good pictures but without the near 50 mb thing . :)
Gustavo Ibarra you mean it isn’t as sharp on the a7 rii or that it is more more sharp on the a7 rii than on the a6500, just asking because I think I’m gonna buy one
Bricktown Much better on a7rii yes, but don’t get me wrong It is excellent excellent on a6500. A7r ii has much more mpx so you can crop much more.
Good one, thank you
So helpful. Massive thanks!
Very helpful video, thanks. I appreciate that you can do this without the youtube quick cutting techniques everyone else uses. In other words, you can do it in one take.
Tactile buttons are also really useful for those of us coming from SLRs I think lol.
I think I'm sticking with my gut and waiting on the 24-105 f/4....I loved my Canon 24-105 f/4L on film.. and will give up the stop of speed for another 35mm on the long end (I've shot crop since I moved to digital. I'm waiting on my A7iii to get here, currently I'm a 7D Mark II user with a 15-85 for the same role and I already grabbed a 55 f/1.8 and 90mm f/2.8) I also prefer 24 to 28 on the wide end (I was SOL for years on Canon because of that)
I own the 24-70 2.8 G master... It's phenomenal! It's fast, sharp, tight from edge to edge, colors out of this lens are amazing. Highly recommended. Thanks for your videos.
It’s also overpriced.
Pablo Villegas how so? If anything it’s abit cheaper than the Nikon equivalent
24-105 is just as sharp. If you don’t need 2.8 then 24-105 is the way to go.
dannyboy12244 The Nikon DSLR 24-70 is less than $1,500 USD.
Justin Tackitt the Tamron 28-75mm is the way to go.
🤯 information overload!! Awesome video!
Thank you for your help.
Hey you do great videos all day and contents are really good... I just wanted an opinion as i am starting on landscape photography and plan to get sony a6000 woth kit and samyang 12mm . Do you suggest sony a6000 in 2019 and also to get 18-105 f4 lens ?
I bought the kit lens because that was in stock and the body-only was not. Now I need to decide if I should keep it just because it is so much lighter than my pro lenses, or sell it. Seems to be a good walk-around lens for when my 24-105 is heavier than I would like.
Hey Danny! What are your favorite “sports” lenses for Sony A7iii today? Anddd what is your favorite Portrait one, anywhere from 50-85mm
Nice comparison! Can you do the same for wide angle lenses? 16-35mm range would be amazing!
What about adapting the sigma 24-70mm f2.8 with mc-11, I heard the mc-11 works better with sigma lenses. Would the auto focus work better?
Currently own and use my older 24-70 2.8 Canon L with metabones adapter on a7R3 with great results across all focal lengths. The GMaster might give me better AF, but hardly worth the investment for me. Considering the Sony Zeiss 50 1.5 and 85 1.8 for additional spread and IQ. Probably a better investment for me. Thoughts?
Will you also be making / linking to videos about Sony Pro support? I'm coming in from Nikon (D750 specifically) and looking into Sony due to.... Well you know. (currently on a6300 but drooling at a7iii)
thats what camera ive just bought, but here the kit lens is ok, but looking for a better all rounder lens. not costing in the £1000
Well done! Do you know whether optical steady shot works with non-Sony lenses? I have the impression that you have to manually set the focal length to use OSS with a non-Sony prime, and so zooms might be unworkable. But perhaps the newer adapters communicate the focal length?
I own the CZ 24-70/4, I am quitte happy with it
Maybe a good luck with my copy
What lens should I get for Sony Alpha a7R III if I use for photograph painting?
Question: with the variable aperture of the kit lens. Can the aperture be re-adjusted once the camera is zoomed in or out or are you stuck at the aperture. Also does this happen in manual mode?
Great vid... I bought the Tamron, being delivered today. :)
Tamron 28-75 f2for video as my first and only lens for A7iii, good choice? Or should I go with Sony 24-70 f4, which has OSS, and 24mm, but sacrifice the f2.8.?
Thanks for a very good overview. I am considering going from a6500 to a7III. I am mostly using the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 for my landscape photography. So I would probably go for the Tamron or the G master.
I'm coming from straight virgin cheeks! Considering, the Sony A7iii w/G Master lens. (Yes, too much cam for me, but I'm willing to learn & I'm buying from a friend)
Thank you, but more pictures to compare so we can evaluate the pro's and con's.
Is it really worth dropping the money on a walk around lens you are going to bin all results anyway?
I bought my first zoom in the 1980's and first roll was absolutely horrible, soft, low contrast, all the rolls was just to bin and I quickly went all primes.
I know the zooms, but not ALL zooms, are better today, but I can adapt some really good ol' glass with the LA-EA4 and save my buck if this lens is a bomb.
Do you think 24mm is wide enough for event video and photos or would a 16-35mm f/4 be better?
Great video! What are your thoughts on the 16-35 f/4?
Paul Shim I have the 16-35 f4 and am really satisfied! It is razor sharp and really nice balanced on the a7 body!
Switched from Canon (5DMKIII) to Sony (A7III) and have used an adapted (MC11) 24-70 f2.8L II lens and my experience has been mixed. Focussing does work and images are beautifully rendered and sharp when focus is nailed. However, when focus hunts, it doesn't just hunt, it goes on a little safari and for no good reason as light and contrast within the focus area is more than adequate. In addition, not all focussing modes are available when adapted on the MC11. Lastly, the the weight...oh boy, Although the A7III is a little lighter than the Canon, the weight distribution with this lens adapted makes this combo perceptually heavier than when mounted on my 5D.
Great review! Thank you!
Wondering what your thoughts are on going with the Canon 24-70 F4 L and MC-11 on an A7III??
Been waiting for the this comparison! Thanks Danny, i ordered the 24-105mm F4 G for my a7iii, now awaiting for them to come in, sigh..
Danny please do a guide/setup for the a7iii.
Will do, thanks.
I've been ripping my hair out trying to figure out which one of these I should get. Thank you for the review!! With the new 24-70mm GM2 coming out, I may pull the trigger on a nice discount for the original version. Thanks again!
I'm considering picking up this Tamron. Did they fix the AF issue?
wait what about the tamron getting 9-10 FPS? and you said its only for the A9?
I have the 24-105, and I love it quite a bit.
I bought xpro-s, ad200+865s flashes, 24-105 G oss & 70-200 f2.8 with a7Riii, next year planning to buy 55 f1.8 & a 16-35Gm..
Aneesh 3D why wait, buy them now and shoot!
when it comes to lens variations, how can you get it fixed?
Which 24-70mm zoom lens do you own or are interested in getting?
Affiliate Links to Lenses Discussed 🔽🔽🔽
Sony 28-70 F3.5-5.6
AMZ: geni.us/YSpL | B&H: bhpho.to/2JnfjOU
Sony 24-70 F4 Zeiss
AMZ: geni.us/35qFR | B&H: bhpho.to/2JVWClk
Sony 24-105 F4 OSS
AMZ: geni.us/En0crQB | B&H: bhpho.to/2Hygmus
Tamron 28-75mm
AMZ: geni.us/QrA4rn | B&H: bhpho.to/2r4Acaf
Sony 24-70GM
AMZ: geni.us/eeXRGnL | B&H: bhpho.to/2JiHaUh
Sigma MC-11 Adapter
AMZ: geni.us/yOlBC | B&H: bhpho.to/2hPCglp
I came into the FE (A7II) with no FE lenses, but from the a6000 with many lenses. Decided to ditch the kit lens and pay about 125 more (225 technically) and get the nifty fifty. Don’t regret it one bit (though I don’t do video work).
At the time you released this video, I purchased the Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS and I'm really happy with it as an all rounder !
But today... There is a new contender killing them all !!! The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN art ;-)
It is a very good lens, but it has no stabilization
@@tatocreativo
Yes but all actual Sony A7 bodies have IBIS so if the lens hasn’t stabilisation it isn’t a deal breaker for me 😉
This was so helpful....Thank you!
That's an absolute no-brainer. You get the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8. Sharp and fast autofocus as the G-master for the price of the 24-70 F4.0
As a first time buyer what is the best all round lens focal length? For say travel photog, street, and landscape?
Awesome video. say if you own 25 mm batis, 55 mm zeiss and 85 mm sony, would it make sense to still own a standard zoom lens? I currently own a 24-105g
24-70 f/2.8 G Master is my go-to workhorse. Have never been disappointed with images with it. Next is the 85 f/1.4 G Master. Creamy backgrounds! For super sharpness go with Sony 28 f/2 and 55 f/1.8. The 28 also has two awesome adapters making it a 21 f/2.8 or 16 f/3.5 fisheye! My travel lens is the 24-240 f/3.5-6.3. Never ceases to impress me. The 35 f/2.8 is best for street photography. It's the lightest, smallest lens of the bunch. Last but not least the 90 macro f/2.8 is great for extreme close-ups and good for portraits! All of these lenses are very sharp in my experience. (I have been shooting Sony A7Rii and A7RIII for 3 years, switching from Nikon full frame after 10 years-D4, Df, D700 and best Nikon glass).
For extreme zooming I tried the 70-200 but its large and bulky. Right now I’m using the Sony RX10IV (24-600mm) with excellent results). Shoots great video also.
I bought the tamron before 2 weeks and I canceled the order bacause of the AUTO-FOCUS issues.. However, Today I just the order again after TAMRON offecial respond about the issues.. And I'm really excited to have the TAMRON 2.8.. As always man.. Great review..!
Thanks for sharing that. I’m glad they did respond to it.
how does it function for you?
Really enjoyed your video. I’m really considering the 24-70mm f4 due to the size, weight and price( able to get one new for $599) but the review have not been so favorable. I do shoot with primes: 28m f2 & 55m f1.8.
Considering a light zoom for traveling and also have a baby 👶. Zoom is convenient.
With all that said (especially the $599 New) is it still worth considering? Or even favoring in all that the 24-105 is till your #1 pick?
Did you get the zeiss 24-70? I have the 24-104 G but im resenting its size and weight more and more, my whole purpose of going over to e mount was to go compact. How does it perform?
What is a good store (online or retail) to buy Sony cameras?
I have a 2 Canon L glasses and paired with the MC 11 but AF on shooting video doesn’t seem to work. Is that normal?