Canadians should have an ABSOLUTE RIGHT to self defence in their own home at whatever means necessary!! Your home is the only place in the entire world where you should feel AND be safe!!
You technically already do have that right in Canada. The problem is that the legal requirements for storage of a firearm conflict with those rights by making it unreasonably difficult to access your fire arm in an emergency.
@@Yukimaru0 Hornady makes great RFID accessible safes. You can have a charged magazine 90% slid into a magwell, ready to go inside that safe. Quick access and ready to go...you just have to be creative.
You have the right to do anything you are willing to risk the consequences for. It is not government that strips us of our rights, it is fear of the potential consequences.
@davidjohnmiller4849 conceal carry is far more effective a deterrent. In an open carry only society, a criminal, who is likely carrying concealed has a great idea of how many armed people are present. In a concealed carry society, they have no clue.
sometimes you just have stand up and be recognized...protect your famliy and possible go to .jail??or be a coward ..not a hard decision for some @@darkcode5562
@@darkcode5562not if you don't report it . Who knows that the scumbag is there in first place ? Get my drift ,,,,they need to fear that idea ,,, cause nobody give a .... about them .
People not allowed to defend themselves are SUBJECTS, not CITIZENS. I appreciate all that you folks at CCFR are doing to promote this fundamental human right in Canada.
I have spoken with the OPP and CFO and they have been pretty blunt in telling me, that if you use a firearm to defend yourself, they WILL charge you... and let the courts figure it out. So in addition to all the trauma of being attacked and possibly harmed, our police forces will further subject you to MORE stress and hurt by causing you to go through the judicial system and pay for a lawyer. What a total crock. In the US, police commend people with defending themselves and saving the taxpayers time and money. What needs to be done, is to sue police when they do this, so they do not have such an easy time charging people... make them undergo some stress and financial hardship as well! Maybe then they won't be so quick in charging victims so ludicrously!
The problem is the wording of the law. As it is it says that anyone even pointing a firearm at someone SHALL be charged, It should say MAY be charged. The difference is that in the first case there is no room for common sense or taking the circumstances into account and simply let the court decide. The second case allows police to decide whether charges should even be laid once all the evidence is taken into account. HUGE difference in that one word change.
@JohnDeereR-zw3wj actually you left out the most important phrase in the clause; "without lawful excuse". So there is no requirement to charge based on that. If that were the case, the police would have to be charged whenever they pointed a firearm.
The problem is the wording of the law. It states that simply pointing a firearm at someone means that you SHALL be charged. This leaves the police no choice whether to charge or not. If he law said you MAY be charged, then that leaves room for police to decide themselves if the circumstances warrant even laying charges. Police actually have no choice when it comes to laying certain firearms charges.
@JohnDeereR-zw3wj not to be argumentative, but you are not reading that section in its entirety. It says it's an offense to point a firearm without a lawful excuse. The wording does leave discretion because "without lawful excuse" is the operative phrase. However, the police and crown do not usually exercise it. I have a pretty good working knowledge of this because I'm a federal peace officer who carries as a part of my duties. Our use of force policies regarding self-defense and pointing firearms, etc. are all governed by the same criminal code provisions as anyone else. There are a few exemptions in the law that allow for prohibited, concealed carry and things like that, but if we recklessly point a firearm, we could be charged under the exact same provision you mentioned.
The criminal code needs to be revised to enshrine the right to defend yourself, your family, and your property. The Firearms Act is rotten to the core and needs to be scrapped.
I don't want my bank account frozen and yes that's an argument so stfu and learn about how that's now an established thing. You do you. I will do what I do and I don't care about you. Ok, I will borderline not vote conservative over finding out that the staffer known as "Chalet Guy" at "GC Strategies" was very likely formerly employed by the Conservatives under contact with a different contractor to "delete the long gun registry" that never actually got deleted after the findings of the Bow River Flooding.... by the CBC of all media. Yeah, those contractors have not been "non-political" for quite some time now. You need to learn what's really going on here. "systemic liberalism" has rotted society so much that yes when I say "I DONT WANT MY ACCOUNTS FROZEN" that's definitely an argument. Accept that for what it is. Or don't. Again, I don't care what you think because you're wrong. OK?
Would support if there weren't implications of frozen bank accounts. Sorry the government has normalized that. It's not my problem and it will never be until some politicians make some hard commitments to what should be considered "a constitution" OK
@@marioncobretti7870 ~ ~They have filed court cases. A lobby group and fought for rights. Provided valuable information both verbally & website, and education.
@@robdavidson2569 Again you have missed the point ; owning a gun is not a God given right. How much clearer can I be on that point. You're not that thick are you ?
@seeya205 It's not an either or proposition. Our self-defense rights are poorly defined. If you use a firearm to defend yourself, you will almost certainly be o to jail and have to get bail, and then you'll be dragged through the courts. There's a good chance the lawyers' fees will bankrupt you as well. Also, why is it an either or proposition? You can fight for both, and self-defense should be part of the foundation of that fight.
@@EndtheWokeMadness That is the priority right now since we are losing them daily. The current government won't even entertain the idea of self defense laws changing. We will have to take it up to Pierre when he is PM.
Where I live in NWO, it could take the cops up to 45 minutes to arrive at my resident. If I had to call 911, I would mention that if a cop isn't here within 5 minutes to also sent an ambulance
I'm late again tuning in to your episode .we have the right to defend and will do so if needed. We Canadians are not naturally violent although. There will be those who will no doubt take the laws into their own hands and cause you harm. That been said I would prefer to have my gun handy but if that's not possible whatever (WEAPON ) I get my hands on will have to do. Notice the word WEAPON .Cause whatever it takes that's the thing you will use to defend yourself and family .A gun is just a tool and is no threat for anyone unless in the hands of a person meaning to do the harm. No one in there right mind would sit and wait for help that you know isn't coming soon enough and let harm happen to your loved ones. I stand with the beleavers of our God given rights to self defense period. Rod and Tracy have the respect of majority of Canadians. Can't say that for most of our government .
I guess I was one of those lazy frustrated folks but a few days ago I read those policies and thought they were well written, made sense and so I applied for my CCFR membership.
As an early Field Officer, and a member within the first couple hundred, I read the entire policy book. It was those policies that made me decide on literally day 1 of membership that the organization deserved my support. I can’t give as much as I once could, but the CCFR is worth it. The CCFR represents the future of firearms ownership in Canada, PERIOD.
Pierre Poilievre seems to be pretty on-side with legal firearms owners. I really hope that he sticks to his 'guns' following the next federal election when we get rid of the petty dictator. Keep up the good works, guys. I appreciate you.
I agree with the right to self defence. In my younger days I would have no problem defending myself. I taught martial arts for years and also was lucky enough to cross train with a number of agencies and organizations. The comment from fools is "Call the police and wait for help." A determined aggressor, even without a weapon, can end you faster than that "guaranteed" police response time.
yes primarily because the small guns they banned were intended to be kept out of "DIVERSE" hands much like the those conducting the shootings in Toronto. section 12.6 of gun control bill C-68 is actually quite systemically racist, much like how abortion in the united states mostly targets "racialized babies" over white babies.... don't wonder why democrats love those knids of laws. democrats invented gun control to keep guns out of the hands of minorities. quite ironic isn't it?
❤ you CCFR for caring for Canadian citizens passions and past times! I enjoy these activities with friends and family and wish to do so indefinitely! 🇨🇦
When you have to explain it, simply ask them why they think a human being should literally have to d ie instead of defending themselves. Ask them why in Canada private citizens can become security guards and carry a rms to defend a Brinks truck, but not your family.
Self defense, no matter what item is being used for that purpose, is a God given right. The old saying, "judged by 12 as opposed to being carried by 6" def applies.
The term “ Self defence “ is a slippery slope because we are in a world where just because you think something, feel something, identify as something, the lines of what you “ FEEL “ and what is realistic in reality are vastly different. People who honestly didn’t have a just cause for self defence will hide behind that and use it as a justification. So we need to be careful when looking at this, But I agree we need to roll back some of these absurd prohibitions that have recently been put in place.
You guys are one of the most amazing people that I've ever come across and I am proud to actually be subscribing to you guys and supporting you guys as I'm a firearms older myself and I don't think anything that's the liberals have been doing with the federal government has been anywhere remotely positive for anybody even outside of gun enthusiasts. So keep up the good work!!
Why does nobody ever reference the "Citizen's Arrest and Self-Defence Act" of 2012, passed by the Harper government? We DO have a right to defend ourselves, written in law.
the supreme court of liberals had someone place a straw-case placed which was intentionally lost in order to guarantee the liberals the assertion that "self defense" using a gun isn't a right in the mid 1990s. I say "straw-case" because any competent lawyer should have been able to perfectly reasonably argue that no other reasonable thing other than a gun actually comes close to guaranteeing that right of equality.
Lol, tracy sounded like the understanding mom: "They sort of lash out. I'm frustrated too, I understand. But that's not the answer". I love this organization.
Citizens deserve the absolute right to defend themselves, family and property by any means including by fir ear ms. When the state bans this, they are basicaly declaring that people are sla ves, not free and equal citizens.
The only knock I've ever had with the CCFR, is really one I have with nearly every gun owner I've talked to. Is the fact that wording like, "we're not trying to be like America" or similar speech. Because such speech is really saying that there is a level of gun control, against non-criminals, that's acceptable. Which is the slope that got us to where we are today
Hey CCFR!! I am with you on the right to bear arms and the justification of necessary force. All the way. We should have and maintain the right and ability to do so. But we, as a family, need to encourage our fellow firearms owners to study and know the regs. for themselves so that there isn’t these dumb moments that bring every body down. Know what you have in your lawful possession and how to store it. And store it and the ammo appropriately. That’s just a beginning. Look after your own stuff and stop whining……. Maintain your rights and don’t supply the politicians with ammo to shut us down……..
Great stuff you 2!! You are our voices. And your composure makes me proud of the both of you. I would let my anger get the better of me in a court room. Respect and many thanks.
IF I have a right to self defence then I have a RIGHT to any tool that allows that defence to be effective. In Canada you will be charged with a crime first, then it is up to you to prove that you acted in self defence.
Welcome to the new reality! I have encountered so many people who, on current events or issues of interest, seem incapable of doing even basic research. It seems to be the prevalent norm of 'tell me, tell me, explain to me, " etc. I'm continually saying check it out, do some research, and statements to that effect. God bless your good work! Given the bone-headed stupidity infecting our society and the forces arrayed against us, I fear it's a losing battle but keep fighting the good fight. I've been trying to overturn the Liberal lies for over 35 yrs.
“You can’t use a gun for self-protection in Canada. It’s not a right that you have,” Justin Trudeau Unless you are Justin Trudeau then you can be surrounded by them, at the Canadian taxpayers expense.
the use of proportional force is allowed to defend yourself.. ROD JUST STATED.. AND BTW IS ALL AROUND THE WORLD LIKE THAT .( or at least the civilized I'm aware of)
You have the right to defend yourself. It is a God given right. Despite what Justin the traitor Trudeau says. I will use whatever I have at my disposal to defend myself, My family and my home.
You have a thankless job, especially in these past few years with the run-up to covid and the sweeping B.S. bans put into place. People are rightfully pissed off, but without the CCFR we wouldnt have many people fighting for our rights. So Thank You.
I agree, proportional force may be legal. the problem is getting proportional response ready when needed (Removing security devices unlocking munition, loading). A loaded gun stored in a quick access case is a criminal offence in Canada.
@@useryggfdccfirst, I want to say that pointing a loaded firearm at any person is unfathomable to me but not impossible when circumstances develop to such a condition requiring it regardless of any legal consequences. i.e: rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6. So, having said that, SOR/98-209 is some of the most convoluted law regarding firearms in Canada. Yes, it allows the storage of ammunition with a firearm but it appears that the process is "NESTED". That is: Gun in vault and ammunition in locked container in same vault. I like your interpretation better but? P.S. just trying to be helpful.
@@TheSkillkeeper Having the Law punishing a person if in a life threatening situation he have to point a firearm at a person is absurd. That actually force the defender to pull the trigger instead of trying to stop the attack.
I, for one, appreciate all the efforts you and the CCFR put forth for law-abiding Canadians, currently not a member but will be in the near future. Thankyou again
We need an update to the Canadian Charter of Right, it just have the right to self defence, defence of another person and defence of property. Keep up the great work CCFR, member for life.
Just a quick point: You don’t know if they’re armed if they’re “kicking your door in” unless you have X-ray vision. The very fact that they’re kicking your door in should be enough.
I would Fully support self defense with a firearm as well as concealed carry! The way our country is going it's glaringly clear that we need to push for this kind of thing!
Anyone in this community paying attention, is thankful for all you do at the CCFR. If not for the CCFR standing up for our rights, Canadian PAL owners would be in an even worse predicament. I can't think of anyone else that even comes close to the effort the CCFR has made.
I had a neighbor who had a mental meltdown because he thought my dog pee on his cedar. He was right in my face screaming at me so we had a little tussle. He went home and called the cops on me. Then 2 days later he showed up at my front door pounding on the door and ringing the bell furiously. Hes lucky i didnt own a gun. He did the same thing to another guy down the street a month later but this time he got arrested and had to go to court. Hes been behaving since but that man is a threat.
With logic like that, perhaps change your handle to ''numbskull''! You seriously would have considered shooting someone because they were acting immature? Perhaps it's people like you that give respectable firearm owners a bad name? Jumping to severe conclusions is infantile at best.
I appreciate all that you're doing. The right to speech and self-defense of the two most fundamental rights we need in to maintain a free society. But one point of order, if someone's kicking in my door I may not know whether or not they are armed. The homeowner is not the aggressor, the one kicking in the door is the one that crossed the Rubicon.
PP likely with his liberal poli-sci degree in "international relations" told Harper to keep the CBC funded... well at least when they still had Don Cherry, that was.
🙌 it's a Last resort up here, not a go to, even with that state of mind. BUT it is proven more people carrying has lowered crime in many places. CC in canada Could be a good thing with the time change. Maybe our New PM might have an open kind with the way of the world these day. I'm here for the knowledge you share, Seems a lot of us have the same look at it, just a different approach to it. Appreciate the channel thanks for Clarification kn your Support for safe self defense
Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Just know that if you use a firearm for self defence they WILL arrest you and you will have to fight for your life again in court.
I defended myself with a firearm some 35 years ago. Was charged and went to court. Charges dropped, cause the procecutors witnesses didn't show up. Stayed the charges. Got my hand gun permit after and just renewed my FAC.
The problem with the laws in Canada is that even if you were completely justified by any reasonable measure, the government will still put you through the wringer even though they know the charges will be acquitted. The process is the punishment. As far as I am concerned, if a police officer would have been justified in a self defence shooting, then so should any citizen.
Scary thing is say for example you did use your firearm in Toronto/Vancouver for self defense you'll be dragged and cuffed immediately and thrown into jail. They treat you like a criminal for doing the right thing.
That's the problem, your guilty until YOU prove that you are innocent. And by the time you've done so, you're in debt of $75-100K in legal bills, which you can't sue the government for it. Crazy!!!
If people are asking question about self-defence using fire arms....it is simply that the rules and regulations are forvever changing and interpretations kick in adding to the confusion....so don't call people lazy for asking questions.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Canadians should have an ABSOLUTE RIGHT to self defence in their own home at whatever means necessary!!
Your home is the only place in the entire world where you should feel AND be safe!!
Why should my right to defend myself confined to my home?
You technically already do have that right in Canada. The problem is that the legal requirements for storage of a firearm conflict with those rights by making it unreasonably difficult to access your fire arm in an emergency.
@@Yukimaru0 you could technically have a thumb print box next to your bed
WE DO!!!! it's God given! & man can never take away what god has given.
@@Yukimaru0 Hornady makes great RFID accessible safes. You can have a charged magazine 90% slid into a magwell, ready to go inside that safe. Quick access and ready to go...you just have to be creative.
There is only one stance to have: self defence is a human right.
gerald stanley was saved by a piece of brass, don't count on it.
Unfortunately as a Canadian I can only wish we had the right to conceal carry backed up by stand your ground laws.
You have the right to do anything you are willing to risk the consequences for. It is not government that strips us of our rights, it is fear of the potential consequences.
very well said @@SuperballsSupervidsOnYT
Not even conceal carry ... I’d be for the right to carry , carry it out in the open for all to see
@davidjohnmiller4849 conceal carry is far more effective a deterrent.
In an open carry only society, a criminal, who is likely carrying concealed has a great idea of how many armed people are present.
In a concealed carry society, they have no clue.
@@drmiles7546 thank you
Government will not stop me from protecting my family or property from armed criminals period
@@darkcode5562 Worth it.
sometimes you just have stand up and be recognized...protect your famliy and possible go to .jail??or be a coward ..not a hard decision for some @@darkcode5562
@@darkcode5562You're on the wrong channel, library.
@@darkcode5562not if you don't report it . Who knows that the scumbag is there in first place ? Get my drift ,,,,they need to fear that idea ,,, cause nobody give a .... about them .
@@darkcode5562nope not if you take care of it yourself, ask any detective you might get the honest answer to that problem .
People not allowed to defend themselves are SUBJECTS, not CITIZENS. I appreciate all that you folks at CCFR are doing to promote this fundamental human right in Canada.
@darkcode5562go away, bot.
@darkcode5562 ~No, you’re wrong, they have filed court cases. Fought for rights. Provided valuable information and education.
Your a slave by definition if you aren’t allowed to defend yourself
'ZACKLY!
Most Canadians don’t think we have a right to protect ourselves… I’ll protect myself at any cost!
It is your right. So yes.
Most Canadians think people have a Right to Murder them.
@darkcode5562liberal shill.
@darkcode5562have you listened to anything ? You can defend yourself in Canada against an armed intruder , with any force you find necessary.
Its a human right fuck the government lmao
I have spoken with the OPP and CFO and they have been pretty blunt in telling me, that if you use a firearm to defend yourself, they WILL charge you... and let the courts figure it out. So in addition to all the trauma of being attacked and possibly harmed, our police forces will further subject you to MORE stress and hurt by causing you to go through the judicial system and pay for a lawyer. What a total crock. In the US, police commend people with defending themselves and saving the taxpayers time and money. What needs to be done, is to sue police when they do this, so they do not have such an easy time charging people... make them undergo some stress and financial hardship as well! Maybe then they won't be so quick in charging victims so ludicrously!
The problem is the wording of the law. As it is it says that anyone even pointing a firearm at someone SHALL be charged, It should say MAY be charged. The difference is that in the first case there is no room for common sense or taking the circumstances into account and simply let the court decide. The second case allows police to decide whether charges should even be laid once all the evidence is taken into account. HUGE difference in that one word change.
@JohnDeereR-zw3wj actually you left out the most important phrase in the clause; "without lawful excuse". So there is no requirement to charge based on that. If that were the case, the police would have to be charged whenever they pointed a firearm.
The problem is the wording of the law. It states that simply pointing a firearm at someone means that you SHALL be charged. This leaves the police no choice whether to charge or not. If he law said you MAY be charged, then that leaves room for police to decide themselves if the circumstances warrant even laying charges. Police actually have no choice when it comes to laying certain firearms charges.
@JohnDeereR-zw3wj not to be argumentative, but you are not reading that section in its entirety. It says it's an offense to point a firearm without a lawful excuse. The wording does leave discretion because "without lawful excuse" is the operative phrase. However, the police and crown do not usually exercise it. I have a pretty good working knowledge of this because I'm a federal peace officer who carries as a part of my duties. Our use of force policies regarding self-defense and pointing firearms, etc. are all governed by the same criminal code provisions as anyone else. There are a few exemptions in the law that allow for prohibited, concealed carry and things like that, but if we recklessly point a firearm, we could be charged under the exact same provision you mentioned.
Every living creature on this planet has the right for self defence aka preservation
I live rurally. The nearest police station is 45 minutes away. When seconds count, police are just 45 minutes away. Need I say more.
You are right, what is expected? Curl up in the fetal position and wait for help? It shouldn't matter if help is 3 minutes away.
Same for where I live.... there would be a body to come and charge me over
Dont be frustrated. There are thousands of people like me who appreciate what you guys do.
1:26 the criminal code especially the firearms act is set up to criminalize the victims of crime. Both need to change.
The criminal code needs to be revised to enshrine the right to defend yourself, your family, and your property. The Firearms Act is rotten to the core and needs to be scrapped.
More of the keyboard warriors need to donate to your cause. I have always supported CCFR. Please help with a financial contribution.
I don't want my bank account frozen and yes that's an argument so stfu and learn about how that's now an established thing. You do you. I will do what I do and I don't care about you. Ok, I will borderline not vote conservative over finding out that the staffer known as "Chalet Guy" at "GC Strategies" was very likely formerly employed by the Conservatives under contact with a different contractor to "delete the long gun registry" that never actually got deleted after the findings of the Bow River Flooding.... by the CBC of all media. Yeah, those contractors have not been "non-political" for quite some time now. You need to learn what's really going on here. "systemic liberalism" has rotted society so much that yes when I say "I DONT WANT MY ACCOUNTS FROZEN" that's definitely an argument. Accept that for what it is. Or don't. Again, I don't care what you think because you're wrong. OK?
Would support if there weren't implications of frozen bank accounts. Sorry the government has normalized that. It's not my problem and it will never be until some politicians make some hard commitments to what should be considered "a constitution" OK
It looks like the politicians have right to protect their selves only.Anything else is a garbage,don't have a right to be protected
Im not sure what they, actually do. So im not donating to that as a result
@@marioncobretti7870 ~ ~They have filed court cases. A lobby group and fought for rights. Provided valuable information both verbally & website, and education.
A cop once told my friend that if you catch someone in your home make certain the body stays inside the house
... and you only want ONE story! Yours!
Somebody create petition for Castle Doctrine/Law and we all sign it.
Thanks you both for fighting for us all!
Self-defense is a God-given right. Government doesn't get to overrule God.
God didn't invent guns man did !
@@DLN-ix6vf So what?
so what ? it's not a God given right.
Read what he wrote @@MrDryqula
@@DLN-ix6vf?
self defense is an inalienable right.
whether you use a stick, rock, knife or gun is irrelevant.
@@robdavidson2569 Again you have missed the point ; owning a gun is not a God given right.
How much clearer can I be on that point. You're not that thick are you ?
I think it stems from the fact that the gun lobby in Canada does not do enough collectively to advance self-defense rights in Canada.
Because they are so busy just trying to save our right to own firearms.
Self-defense rights already exist. Fighting to keep our firearms is the first priority. What advancement do you want?
@seeya205 It's not an either or proposition. Our self-defense rights are poorly defined. If you use a firearm to defend yourself, you will almost certainly be o to jail and have to get bail, and then you'll be dragged through the courts. There's a good chance the lawyers' fees will bankrupt you as well. Also, why is it an either or proposition? You can fight for both, and self-defense should be part of the foundation of that fight.
@@EndtheWokeMadness That is the priority right now since we are losing them daily. The current government won't even entertain the idea of self defense laws changing. We will have to take it up to Pierre when he is PM.
Thank you CCFR team for your hard work
Self defense is a human right.
illicit drug consumption is a right in canada. self defense with a gun is not a right in canada. learn the liberal politics of the land.
@campsitez2355 that can all be changed real easy. It's called get up off our asses and do it.
Where I live in NWO, it could take the cops up to 45 minutes to arrive at my resident. If I had to call 911, I would mention that if a cop isn't here within 5 minutes to also sent an ambulance
I don't live in the nwt but I am 30 min away from town as Ralph Klein famously said shoot shovel shut up
@@pcpwcail Best quote ever.
@@lougarou8431 our best Premier so far. Went asked bums where they were from (not Alberta) and offered them bus tickets home.
I'm late again tuning in to your episode .we have the right to defend and will do so if needed. We Canadians are not naturally violent although. There will be those who will no doubt take the laws into their own hands and cause you harm. That been said I would prefer to have my gun handy but if that's not possible whatever (WEAPON ) I get my hands on will have to do. Notice the word WEAPON .Cause whatever it takes that's the thing you will use to defend yourself and family .A gun is just a tool and is no threat for anyone unless in the hands of a person meaning to do the harm. No one in there right mind would sit and wait for help that you know isn't coming soon enough and let harm happen to your loved ones. I stand with the beleavers of our God given rights to self defense period. Rod and Tracy have the respect of majority of Canadians. Can't say that for most of our government .
Never tell em to send an ambulance also, that implies intent on your part. Call 911 AFTER it's over and there is only 1 story to tell!
I guess I was one of those lazy frustrated folks but a few days ago I read those policies and thought they were well written, made sense and so I applied for my CCFR membership.
As an early Field Officer, and a member within the first couple hundred, I read the entire policy book. It was those policies that made me decide on literally day 1 of membership that the organization deserved my support. I can’t give as much as I once could, but the CCFR is worth it. The CCFR represents the future of firearms ownership in Canada, PERIOD.
I've got 2 different t-shirts from the CCFR that say "self-defence is a human right"-I think that's a pretty clear policy right there👍
Pierre Poilievre seems to be pretty on-side with legal firearms owners. I really hope that he sticks to his 'guns' following the next federal election when we get rid of the petty dictator. Keep up the good works, guys. I appreciate you.
I agree with the right to self defence. In my younger days I would have no problem defending myself. I taught martial arts for years and also was lucky enough to cross train with a number of agencies and organizations.
The comment from fools is "Call the police and wait for help." A determined aggressor, even without a weapon, can end you faster than that "guaranteed" police response time.
When seconds count, the police are only minutes away!
It's damned near impossible to get a CCW in Canada !
This needs to change
yes primarily because the small guns they banned were intended to be kept out of "DIVERSE" hands much like the those conducting the shootings in Toronto. section 12.6 of gun control bill C-68 is actually quite systemically racist, much like how abortion in the united states mostly targets "racialized babies" over white babies.... don't wonder why democrats love those knids of laws. democrats invented gun control to keep guns out of the hands of minorities. quite ironic isn't it?
Self defense should fall under the basics of human rites
❤ you CCFR for caring for Canadian citizens passions and past times! I enjoy these activities with friends and family and wish to do so indefinitely! 🇨🇦
As a law abiding firearms owner I would be 100% for the right to carry !
This confusion needs to be addressed. I wish you the best of luck, I am aware that this will not be a easy task to do.
Final word, I’ll do what I have to do, to protect my family- enough said !
When you have to explain it, simply ask them why they think a human being should literally have to d ie instead of defending themselves. Ask them why in Canada private citizens can become security guards and carry a rms to defend a Brinks truck, but not your family.
You can defend your family just as a brinks guard would defend themselves from an attack.
Self defense, no matter what item is being used for that purpose, is a God given right.
The old saying, "judged by 12 as opposed to being carried by 6" def applies.
The term “ Self defence “ is a slippery slope because we are in a world where just because you think something, feel something, identify as something, the lines of what you “ FEEL “ and what is realistic in reality are vastly different.
People who honestly didn’t have a just cause for self defence will hide behind that and use it as a justification.
So we need to be careful when looking at this, But I agree we need to roll back some of these absurd prohibitions that have recently been put in place.
You guys are one of the most amazing people that I've ever come across and I am proud to actually be subscribing to you guys and supporting you guys as I'm a firearms older myself and I don't think anything that's the liberals have been doing with the federal government has been anywhere remotely positive for anybody even outside of gun enthusiasts. So keep up the good work!!
Why does nobody ever reference the "Citizen's Arrest and Self-Defence Act" of 2012, passed by the Harper government? We DO have a right to defend ourselves, written in law.
the supreme court of liberals had someone place a straw-case placed which was intentionally lost in order to guarantee the liberals the assertion that "self defense" using a gun isn't a right in the mid 1990s. I say "straw-case" because any competent lawyer should have been able to perfectly reasonably argue that no other reasonable thing other than a gun actually comes close to guaranteeing that right of equality.
You been to Canada lately? JT doesn't let those laws happen!
Because it's all fake, there is no process or system, only people saying whatever's convenient in the moment.
You guys doing a great job absolute right to self defence at home and conceal carry wouldn't have all this criminal activity going on
Thank you For all your hard work, and all that you do for Canadians
I appreciate this down to earth discussion. Thank you.
It's alright to use a gun to defend a Brinks truck or a politician but not our family. What has *really* occurred in this country?
When you and your family's life is on the table. What are you going to do????? Bonnie and Clyde didn't care!!!!!
Thanks for everything.. Rod, you're looking better praying for you
Thank you CCFR!
Lol, tracy sounded like the understanding mom: "They sort of lash out. I'm frustrated too, I understand. But that's not the answer".
I love this organization.
Citizens deserve the absolute right to defend themselves, family and property by any means including by fir ear ms. When the state bans this, they are basicaly declaring that people are sla ves, not free and equal citizens.
The only knock I've ever had with the CCFR, is really one I have with nearly every gun owner I've talked to. Is the fact that wording like, "we're not trying to be like America" or similar speech. Because such speech is really saying that there is a level of gun control, against non-criminals, that's acceptable. Which is the slope that got us to where we are today
Agree 👍
It's good you have clarified that!
Hey CCFR!! I am with you on the right to bear arms and the justification of necessary force. All the way. We should have and maintain the right and ability to do so.
But we, as a family, need to encourage our fellow firearms owners to study and know the regs. for themselves so that there isn’t these dumb moments that bring every body down. Know what you have in your lawful possession and how to store it. And store it and the ammo appropriately.
That’s just a beginning. Look after your own stuff and stop whining……. Maintain your rights and don’t supply the politicians with ammo to shut us down……..
Keep doing the work guys. It's CRITICAL
Great stuff you 2!! You are our voices. And your composure makes me proud of the both of you. I would let my anger get the better of me in a court room. Respect and many thanks.
We shouldn't have to defend ourselves and our family twice. once from a criminal, and once from our own government
IF I have a right to self defence then I have a RIGHT to any tool that allows that defence to be effective. In Canada you will be charged with a crime first, then it is up to you to prove that you acted in self defence.
This needs to change
Welcome to the new reality! I have encountered so many people who, on current events or issues of interest, seem incapable of doing even basic research. It seems to be the prevalent norm of 'tell me, tell me, explain to me, " etc. I'm continually saying check it out, do some research, and statements to that effect. God bless your good work! Given the bone-headed stupidity infecting our society and the forces arrayed against us, I fear it's a losing battle but keep fighting the good fight. I've been trying to overturn the Liberal lies for over 35 yrs.
The age old art of self preservation ‼️👍👍👍👍👍👍
You guys are *SO* underrated for your efforts. Please don't give up! 👍
“You can’t use a gun for self-protection in Canada. It’s not a right that you have,”
Justin Trudeau
Unless you are Justin Trudeau then you can be surrounded by them, at the Canadian taxpayers expense.
When has that idiot ever been right about anything.
the use of proportional force is allowed to defend yourself.. ROD JUST STATED.. AND BTW IS ALL AROUND THE WORLD LIKE THAT .( or at least the civilized I'm aware of)
Then trudy needs to get rid of all his armed guards.
Private citizens can also become security guards and use g uns to defend Brinks trucks.....just not your family.
Good point and it clearly shows the hypocrisy of the state.@@LegendofNelda
Rod/Tracey, we really appreciate the work you are doing for us. Never give up, we’re standing with you!
You have the right to defend yourself.
It is a God given right.
Despite what Justin the traitor Trudeau says.
I will use whatever I have at my disposal to defend myself, My family and my home.
Keep up the good work you do. Much appreciated from Alberta.
You have a thankless job, especially in these past few years with the run-up to covid and the sweeping B.S. bans put into place. People are rightfully pissed off, but without the CCFR we wouldnt have many people fighting for our rights. So Thank You.
Thank you for your hard work
I agree, proportional force may be legal. the problem is getting proportional response ready when needed (Removing security devices unlocking munition, loading). A loaded gun stored in a quick access case is a criminal offence in Canada.
Keep the mag separate from the pew pew.....in the same case.
@@useryggfdccfirst, I want to say that pointing a loaded firearm at any person is unfathomable to me but not impossible when circumstances develop to such a condition requiring it regardless of any legal consequences. i.e: rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6. So, having said that, SOR/98-209 is some of the most convoluted law regarding firearms in Canada. Yes, it allows the storage of ammunition with a firearm but it appears that the process is "NESTED". That is: Gun in vault and ammunition in locked container in same vault. I like your interpretation better but?
P.S. just trying to be helpful.
@@TheSkillkeeper
Having the Law punishing a person if in a life threatening situation he have to point a firearm at a person is absurd.
That actually force the defender to pull the trigger instead of trying to stop the attack.
I, for one, appreciate all the efforts you and the CCFR put forth for law-abiding Canadians, currently not a member but will be in the near future. Thankyou again
Thank you.
Good on the CCFR for Clarifying their Policy ! 👍👍🥰
Tanks both for your efforts!!!
We need an update to the Canadian Charter of Right, it just have the right to self defence, defence of another person and defence of property. Keep up the great work CCFR, member for life.
Where I stand on Self Preservation (Defense) is that I STAND MY GROUND.
Thank you
Everything living thing has a right to defend itself. No government can change that
archery less storage requirements
doesn't disturb neighbors
I couldn’t find a policy on suppressors on the website. I know your position but maybe it should be added. :)
Just a quick point: You don’t know if they’re armed if they’re “kicking your door in” unless you have X-ray vision. The very fact that they’re kicking your door in should be enough.
IT IS.
Is there a video where this self defence with a firearm in canada is explained?
That would be really good information.
Thanks
try that Runkle of the Bailey guy he has lots of videos on almost every subject with guns.
States right in section 20 of the firearms act that protection of life is a valid reason to own a firearm.
Summon the Lawyer Elf!
@@jsav5845thanks
@@DLN-ix6vfthanks
Asking TURDO how many are in his security detail must be taboo in the HOC
I would Fully support self defense with a firearm as well as concealed carry! The way our country is going it's glaringly clear that we need to push for this kind of thing!
Anyone in this community paying attention, is thankful for all you do at the CCFR. If not for the CCFR standing up for our rights, Canadian PAL owners would be in an even worse predicament. I can't think of anyone else that even comes close to the effort the CCFR has made.
I had a neighbor who had a mental meltdown because he thought my dog pee on his cedar. He was right in my face screaming at me so we had a little tussle. He went home and called the cops on me. Then 2 days later he showed up at my front door pounding on the door and ringing the bell furiously. Hes lucky i didnt own a gun. He did the same thing to another guy down the street a month later but this time he got arrested and had to go to court. Hes been behaving since but that man is a threat.
Maybe its a good thing you don’t own one
With logic like that, perhaps change your handle to ''numbskull''!
You seriously would have considered shooting someone because they were acting immature?
Perhaps it's people like you that give respectable firearm owners a bad name? Jumping to severe conclusions is infantile at best.
We have every right to defend ourselves.
You do good work, thank you.
100% bang on folks
I appreciate all that you're doing. The right to speech and self-defense of the two most fundamental rights we need in to maintain a free society. But one point of order, if someone's kicking in my door I may not know whether or not they are armed. The homeowner is not the aggressor, the one kicking in the door is the one that crossed the Rubicon.
Pierre Poilievre For Prime Minister!! 🇨🇦
PP likely with his liberal poli-sci degree in "international relations" told Harper to keep the CBC funded... well at least when they still had Don Cherry, that was.
Good. Thanks.
🙌 it's a Last resort up here, not a go to, even with that state of mind. BUT it is proven more people carrying has lowered crime in many places. CC in canada Could be a good thing with the time change. Maybe our New PM might have an open kind with the way of the world these day. I'm here for the knowledge you share, Seems a lot of us have the same look at it, just a different approach to it. Appreciate the channel thanks for Clarification kn your Support for safe self defense
If someone is kicking my door in, I’m not going to wait around to find out if they’re armed.
Absolutely self defence
If evil intends to do harm as they usually do , defend yourself and love ones at all cost.
Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Just know that if you use a firearm for self defence they WILL arrest you and you will have to fight for your life again in court.
Here in Alberta we still subscribe to the three S rule on the farm.
Guns will get you trough times that money won’t !!!
I defended myself with a firearm some 35 years ago. Was charged and went to court. Charges dropped, cause the procecutors witnesses didn't show up. Stayed the charges. Got my hand gun permit after and just renewed my FAC.
Whether in your home, in public or in bear country, a gun makes the best tool for a defensive emergency.
"I rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6"
What was the self defence arvument in the court ? I cant find it.
The problem with the laws in Canada is that even if you were completely justified by any reasonable measure, the government will still put you through the wringer even though they know the charges will be acquitted. The process is the punishment. As far as I am concerned, if a police officer would have been justified in a self defence shooting, then so should any citizen.
WARNING ! I keep my house locked to protect you from me........
🙄
Some people expect everyone to do everything for them while they do nothing.
Scary thing is say for example you did use your firearm in Toronto/Vancouver for self defense you'll be dragged and cuffed immediately and thrown into jail. They treat you like a criminal for doing the right thing.
That's the problem, your guilty until YOU prove that you are innocent. And by the time you've done so, you're in debt of $75-100K in legal bills, which you can't sue the government for it. Crazy!!!
If people are asking question about self-defence using fire arms....it is simply that the rules and regulations are forvever changing and interpretations kick in adding to the confusion....so don't call people lazy for asking questions.