2:44 You have to change the map to the Roman Empire map under Emperor Iustinian I., a real protoromanian emperor. In that version the slavic immigration in the Balkan peninsula did not happen, the protoromanians remain in the Balkan peninsula, and lead the new Roiman Empire from Constantinopole.
@@Incognito-15A Spanish also couldve ended up Arabic due to Arabic influence. French also couldve ended up Germanic due to German influence. Every language has their own influences otherwise what would make the language unique. What matters is the majority of the language. The majority of the Romanian language is Latin which makes it a Latin language.
@@ruben4447 I know but anything could happen,even a small event can change everything (inform yourself better,deep deeper in the history for other details of the history of Romania next time)
@@Incognito-15A What do you mean i should inform myself? Are you implying im not informed? All i said is Romania isnt slavic which is true. Done end of discussion. There is nothing wrong with my statement. But what you are bringing up is something fictional. Something didnt happen. Just because Romania couldve become Slavic doesnt have anything to do with what the reality actually yes. And also im Romanian so i guess i would be the better informed one here if you arent also Romanian yourself.
Underrated channel
2:44 You have to change the map to the Roman Empire map under Emperor Iustinian I., a real protoromanian emperor. In that version the slavic immigration in the Balkan peninsula did not happen, the protoromanians remain in the Balkan peninsula, and lead the new Roiman Empire from Constantinopole.
Slavic ending doesnt make sense because Romania isnt slavic.
We could've end being Slavic due Bulgarian influence
@@Incognito-15A Spanish also couldve ended up Arabic due to Arabic influence. French also couldve ended up Germanic due to German influence. Every language has their own influences otherwise what would make the language unique. What matters is the majority of the language. The majority of the Romanian language is Latin which makes it a Latin language.
@@ruben4447 I know but anything could happen,even a small event can change everything (inform yourself better,deep deeper in the history for other details of the history of Romania next time)
@@Incognito-15A What do you mean i should inform myself? Are you implying im not informed? All i said is Romania isnt slavic which is true. Done end of discussion. There is nothing wrong with my statement. But what you are bringing up is something fictional. Something didnt happen. Just because Romania couldve become Slavic doesnt have anything to do with what the reality actually yes. And also im Romanian so i guess i would be the better informed one here if you arent also Romanian yourself.
@@ruben4447 Still not informed enough,is not a shame