@@braytonewell he meant like child predator, not THEE predator. In case you don't know, remake Freddy had his lore expanded upon with him being a child predator before becoming the dream demon.
A killer with a whip would be cool though.. It would have to be different than nemesis tentacle and Aliens tail strike. Maybe a centurion obvious choice would be a slave owner but they wouldn’t have the guts to do a theme like that.
Let's list all the evidence that this guy is just talking out of his ass Number 1: Announcing the FNAF collab 3 days after it was all signed is utter bullshit. Scott was talking about it already a month prior on his socials Number 2: He says that there are only 2 blacklisted IPs on BHVRs list, those being Candyman and Jeepers Creepers. BUT then he proceeds to say Slenderman is never coming because of the stabs and IT, The Shining, Cujo, or any other Stephen King property is also not coming, so which is it? 2 blacklisted or a shit ton? Number 3: He said very early on that he couldnt talk about certain things due to legal reasons, but then proceeds to spill all the beans about every contract, every negotiation that happened, is happening and probably wont happen in the future like its no big deal. This guy is making stuff up on the spot to get attention, and other credible leakers only said he is legit to generate hype or to get people like you off their trail or else they might get in trouble with BHVR
Jeepers Creepers I can 100% see that IP being blacklisted. It is a common fact the maker of those movies is a major child predator. So I could see why BHVR wouldn't want to ever put that IP into that game
Your first and third points are absolutely valid but the second could still be possible. Yes it’s not looking bright for any Stephen king properties to get into dbd but that doesn’t mean they’re blacklisted. There’s still a very small chance some make it but candyman and keepers have a 0% chance. However, a similar point to add to his fakeness is bringing up the controversy about the slenderman stabbings and that NOT being blacklisted, so I agree with you there for sure.
He might be an atttention seeker but if its true it really sucks since I really wanna see Candyman or It or Slender man in the game since there such cool killers (In my opinion and if the bad stuff didnt happen they would be even better)
2017x is a HUGE liar. He constantly backtracked. First he said they got the FNAF license 3 days before the announcement, and then after being proven wrong, he backtracked and said "actually something happened 3 days before not the license." this dude is a fraud
Yeah. Thats the part of the video where any sense of believability for this guy went straight down the drain. Not saying everything they’re saying is wrong (especially the Tokyo Ghoul part), but I definitely suspect some of this is made up.
hesitant to trust this leaker on the account that they are claiming to know a lot of information in a broad scope of fields. for example, they somehow have information on the timelines that Mathieu Cote made deals with licensors , like netflix and scott cawthon, (which I feel would be classified information) but somehow don't have information on Freddy's rework (could be a defense strategy, since Freddy's rework will be revealed very soon, and that would give them up as lying very early). they also subtly backtrack a couple of times. for example, when they claimed the fnaf collab was locked in 3 days before the announcement, then someone pointed out a collab reveal was hinted at more than 5 days before the announcement even happened, they then claimed that "idk, i got told 3 days this isnt from me" the Candyman thing is also suspicious to me. Slavery is definitely taboo, but this game also has themes of torture, cult activities, technically pedophilia with Freddy, child murder with the FNaF chapter... I feel like banning an IP due to the influence slavery has on its storyline would be very strange, since this, at the end of the day is a game for adults... and even then, teenagers and even children learn about slavery in schools. I feel like it would be very different if Candyman tries to frame slavery as a positive, and it most certainly does not. Yeah, idk. As a whole I don't buy it. It's very easy to go into discords and claim you know information, by jumping on information that's already been supposedly leaked, and making up things that haven't been leaked yet. Edit: I realize I didn't elaborate much on the "broad scope of information" points. but, I personally believe that given past leaks, information on future content is really only given to those who need to know about said content. So I find it bizarre this non-BHVR employee somehow knows what characters are coming in future chapters, has seen the model for the next killer, knows what maps are coming for FNaF... and then for some reason also have what is likely highly confidential information about the nature of these license deals, down to when they occurred, and which licenses have been put on a "blacklist"... yet don't have information on updates coming in the next month-- arguably content less interesting than any of the prior supposed leaks. just odd is all. to me this implies that this, again, non-employee would have to have not just a source on the inside, but MULTIPLE on the inside, all giving their information to the same person. weird.
Well you could argue that both a nightmare on elm street and FNAF deal with child murder so yeah, you could also argue pinhead with it’s sexual themes too
Absolutely fake. The stuff about the fnaf deal being signed 3 days before the announcement is legally and logically impossible. Scott talked about the collab almost a month in advance. This means the deal was already signed.
Absolutely. Additionally, the idea that Candyman would be blacklisted due to slavery themes or that Slender Man wouldn’t be considered due to the stabbings is ridiculous. These are horror characters that kill people, generally speaking. The amount of touchy themes and real life events that were inspired by IP’s already in Dead by Daylight (Bubba, Michael, Freddy, etc.) tells us that Behavior understands they’re working with fictional characters that aren’t known for being positive or uplifting. This isn’t a family game. If Candyman weren’t to make it into DbD it would be because Tony Todd passed away. And I can’t honestly think of a good reason they wouldn’t bring Slender Man in other than potential licensing complications.
@@Shaneplicitythey gotta bring in Candyman. He is a horror legend. I know it's more of a hurdle now than it was before since Tony Todd has sadly passed away, but I know it can still be done.
@@asterix1912 I absolutely agree with you. I’m simply saying that if he weren’t to come into the game, Tony Todd not being able to voice him would be a bigger issue than “slavery themes”
Idk guys- BHVR seems really nervous about anything can be attributed to racism. Apparently the hound master was originally a White slave catcher and behavior stoped and said “why are we doing this?” Then proceeded to change her entire design and lore to be a Black woman pirate. And this isn’t a new trend for them being nervous to touch anything that could be linked to racism. Don’t forget they removed the survivor masks from Leather face because racist people were wearing Claudette’s face and targeting Black streamers. So them saying they don’t want to touch Candyman because of slavery themes sounds on brand for them. Do not take this as me agreeing with them, because I don’t- but I wouldn’t be surprised if this was confirmed. As for slender man… While those real world events inspired horror icons, the horror icon of slender man inspired two young girls into stabbing their “friend.” It’s not the same thing. The difference is that these other slashers were inspired BY horrific events, and in many cases it’s a LOOSE inspiration too, just look up LPN’s episode on Ed Gein… the real events are nothing like TCM, but Hollywood is Hollywood. The random sleep death of the Cambodian family’s that inspired Wes Craven to make NOES is nothing like what took place in the films. It’s loose inspiration to create the icons of horror that DBD is adapting into their game. I can 100% see the difference
@ I see what you’re saying. First, the idea that anything in The Houndmaster’s lore is related to slavery is nothing more than a rumor. This was not confirmed to have ever been true. Second, I wasn’t saying that crimes or events in reality inspired horror IP’s (though that has happened loosely, as you’ve mentioned), I’m saying that some of the iconic IP’s already in the game have inspired real life events and crimes just as The Slender Man mythos did. For example, in 2012, Jake Evans (a real person) killed his mother and sister as he admitted to being inspired by Michael Myers. In 2004, Daniel Gonzalez went on a killing spree in London, and admitted that he was inspired by both Freddy & Jason. There are other examples too, these aren’t the only ones. Despite these tragic real life events, Michael and Freddy are both still in the game. I don’t think the stabbings associated with Slender Man is enough to keep him out of the game. And I don’t say this in disrespect towards those affected by the real life events mentioned.
> Clearly does not know how licensing and law surrounding it works > Says "I legally can’t answer that" then proceeds to "leak" highly sensitive content? > Make a ton of blanket statements and not give ONE concrete evidence > Claims he knows what the Freddy rework is but refuse to spill the beans despite stating Springtrap’s entire power > Gives obviously fake reasons behind BHVR not getting Slender and Candyman. Now, don’t get me wrong, I don’t think we will ever get Candyman, but there’s no way in hell they wouldn’t add Slenderman just because of a crime from 10 years ago. Also, Mathieu Cote has talked about Slendy before and didn’t even mention the crimes. Nobody gives a damn anymore, as they should, it wasn’t the creator’s fault what tragic events happened. And the slavery themes thing is just laughably fake. This will go down as one of the dumbest "leaks" in the history of dbd I’m afraid 😂
Yeah, absolutely fake Not only is the fnaf license deal being made 3 days before the announcement impossible, but blacklisting candyman for having slavery themes while allowing reboot freddy who is canonicaly a child predator, and also allowing fnaf wich is litterary about child murder is a VERY odd choice...
So they blacklisted Candyman for themes of Slavery, but they have 2010s Freddy, a Child Predator, and the Xenomorph, who literally has a stage in their lifecycle that forcibly impregnates beings (It's not in game, but still in Xenomorph lore)? Yeah, okay. I'm taking this with a huge grain of salt, but DBD already has a lot of themes such as cult activities, child murder, torture, etc, and I feel like blacklisting something for heavy topics such as slavery when topics just as heavy, if not more heavy are already in the game is very hypocritical, and that really rubs me the wrong way. Like I said tho, take what this guy says with a huge grain of salt. The FNaF thing is also really strange to me since he backtracks when he's corrected about the reveal.
Yeah, I agree. I don't see them blacklisting Candyman for that reason. Jeepers Creepers is the only license BHVR has blacklisted, and I feel that if Candyman was blacklisted they'd say that same as they did with Jeepers Creepers, especially since he seemed to imply that this was not BVHR's decision... Which the license holders I don't see why they'd be like "Oh Candyman used to be a slave so we can't legally let you have him." or whatever.
@@ragabashmoon1551 Yeah, Jeepers Creepers I actually understand, but Candyman just seems so out of left field to be blacklisted. And I see no reason why the license holders would do something like that. I do think it's possible that he could be right about some things and wrong about others, and if that's the case, I do think that he's wrong about the blacklisting.
this leak is just repeating every leak before tbh, also the fact that Candyman being blacklisted as an ip kills this leak for me, It just seems so random especially since his name appeared on dbd surveys
Yes, I don't believe they would ever blacklist Candyman. For slavery? That's just nitpicking. We have a bunch of other licenses with mature themes. We literally have pedo Freddy. We're getting Springtrap, a child murderer. We have Pinhead, & the movies have very sexual tones. There's a cultist survivor. The list goes on. Plus they know Candyman is wanted. I love the topics of leaks & rumours, I find them interesting & engaging, but some of the rumours from this person are very... random indeed
I'm rooting for a Candyman chapter. I really like seeing Pinhead, who is another killer from Clive Barker's stories, in DbD and it would be great to see Candyman too.
FNaF couldn't have been grabbed 3 days before the announcement because the schedule for the 10th anniversary was released in June, 2 months before the announcement How could Scott announce a surprise collab which was meant to be DBD on June 19th but give the license to BHVR on July 31st?
@@Hazay9thbecause slavery is a fucked up topic and dbd players overreact to everything, People got pissy at unknowns skins and they forged up some DEI bullshit when a killer was a black woman
Especially with Freddy being a literal pedo, I don’t see why they’d shy away from Candyman just because of slavery especially when that’s just his origin and how he became Candyman it’s not his whole story at all, and there’s even more story if they also get the rights to the 2021 sequel Wait a minute Plus wasnt he on a recent survey? lol yea I call BS 😂
@Hazay9th right, but I was just pointing out the contradiction in the "leaker's" statement, where he said that he was "blacklisted for the slavery theme, but BHVR tried to get him" in the exact same sentence
A lot of the reasons this guy is giving is kind of…. odd? I don’t think Scott would rush out signing everything right before the anniversary. Idk something just seems off….
Fake. The info about FNAF tipped me off. It’s legally impossible for a collab to be signed 3 days before its announcement. The FNAF collaboration at least had to be a month or two in advance.
I need heeeer, Carrie would be fucking sick, would be funny that her prestige bloody cosmetic it's actually her clean, cuz she's already covered in blood, but regarding all the bullshit the guy is telling, this is kinda right, Stephen is kinda difficult to get deals.
@goodnight2931 well yes, but if we were gonna get a Stephen King license, I would want it to be the shining. Jack Torrance would be a perfect and iconic killer, the overlook hotel as the map would be perfect for the game, unlike Carrie or IT, and the lobby music and chase theme would be legendary too. It's one of my biggest dream licenses
Postal and Cry of Fear would be amazing to see! But I guess they would be waaay to edgy for current DBD. I'm hoping for some more og horror licences like Psycho, Clocktower, Silent Night Deadly Night but I can't imagine any of them being added with DBDs current direction.
Postal easy solution it's use the Postal Dude from Postal 2. (Just think in that he goes inside of entity mist for incident or for try to made the entity sign he's petition making that he's on the realm for the promise of had he's petition sign)
The only thing I 100% believe him on is IT. It's 100% true that Stephen King does not want video games made after he got burned by the horrific Lawnmower Man game.
Getting pennywise will be a hard one but I think if we get art the clown than maybe Stephan king would allow pennywise because he did have praise to art the clown
@@k.m.k.2976, my brother in the entity, slavery is a fucked up topic. Do you seriously think people would be fine with that? Also cut on the DEI bullshit. You don't even know what DEI stands for 💀💀
@k.m.k.2976 one of the most iconic horror icons played by a legendary actor and they say no because slavery? They have messed up things in lore but slavery is where they draw the line? I can see why they are so disliked
@burtonthegrape9217 2 things for this: 1: BhvR is playing safe, they hold so many licences and if they got into real big controversy they could risk licences. 2: Tony Todd is dead, I don't what else to say, he's fucking dead so we can't get the voice actor. Even if we did candyman it wouldn't sell the same
@@k.m.k.2976 Enough with the cringe "DEI" stuff you fools keep crying over. Immediately believing such obviously fake leaks shows your lacking IQ enough already.
Something’s odd about these “leaks”… 1) Candyman is so much more than the son of a slave, he’s an once good man turned into a monster, a tragic figure, a villain resembling more Dracula as the supernatural seductor rather than a common slasher… And if Behavior can touch subjects as horrifying as the MK Ultra, or the many crimes of remake Freddy, one’d think they’d be able to touch the tragic subject of slavery. It’s not like they’d be endorsing it. Jeepers Creepers is one thing because of that Victor Silva and his twisted, sick mind, but that argument of Candyman being blacklisted because of being related to slavery falls on its own. And if come the case they didn’t wanna risk it they could simply omit mentioning the part of him being the son of a slave, and just start the lore at his upbringing in the, to use Purcell’s words, “polite society”. 2) I love Robert Muldoon as much as the next person, but him being the instead of Alan Grant or Ellie? Back to the Candyman comparison, it’d be like if (ignoring the plot twist) instead of Helen as a survivor they’d have Trevor or Purcell. 3) Netflix gave back ST because of the pressure instead of money? What? Since when do they care? 4) Stephen King being a grouchy, old videogame hater with a massive ego are old news, and okay he'd not allow his book characters in the game, more power to him, I guess… But wouldn't the studios be able to license their adaptations of the characters? Hadn't Schmuckles said in the The Shining licensing situation video that the rights of the Kubrick adaptation (and let's be honest, the most iconic one) were still in the hands of WB? Or Pennywise, aren't they doing TV show and all? 5) And Predator not coming? I know you said it might be a joke, but if hypothetically had they been serious, why would Disney allow Grid to be a skin then? To resume, I don't think this person is a legit leaker, and Ruthless may be trolling. There's too many holes on their arguments, I guess we'll find out in time.
@@just_roo5483I KNOW❤, and did you know that DBD is not going to be the first horror game (but the second) that Scott has collaborated with and Springtrap also holds a axe in this game 0:46 It’s a Roblox horror survival game called: Pillar Chase 2 (idk why it’s called that if the first one doesn’t exist) and Springtrap has three abilities that lead him to guarantee kills in PC2. (Imagine if his power are the same abilities in PC2)
I don’t believe any leaker that has no info on anything we can actually confirm, u can’t convince me that u can get info on confidential licensing deals but can’t tell us anything specific about Freddy’s rework, also the Candyman thing sounds ridiculous, it’d be one thing if he was a slave owner but Candyman was the victim and is the biggest representation they could get FOR the black community, I assume it’d be more insulting to black people if Candyman wasn’t allowed in the game for being the VICTIM
So you're telling me that Scott signed in July 28th that Springtrap was going to be in DBD? Like... 3 days before revealing the schedule? That sounds so weird to me
I think it inevitable the art the clown will come to dbd, the director wants to get his name out into other forms of media and they can use the money paid for the license for and increased budget for the next film which the director obviously would want
note how whenever a topic outside of what has been publically leaked by a reliable source is brought up, this "leaker" acts all confused and is like "idk its from another source i didnt hear about that etc etc". very hard to believe this guy is a reliable source, if even one.
I’m calling BS cause of the candyman being blacklisted claim. So candyman does have themes of slavery but if you look into his backstory, slavery is not really a big factor into his backstory. 1. The man behind Candyman Daniel Robitaille wasn’t a slave, his father was a slave but Daniel wasn’t. He was actually a wealthy artist in the late 1800s. 2. Imo, candyman has more of a racial violence theme more than slavery bc Candyman wasn’t killed bc he was a slave but rather he was killed bc he fell in love with a white woman. So yea I’m not really buying that BHVR would blacklist Candyman due to Slavery themes when slavery is not a big factor in Candymans story
Exactly this. Nothing adds up about it. Plus it was in the most recent survey, so they're interested in it, & many people want it. Even Tony himself, hearted an insta comment about someone wanting Candyman in DBD. RIP Tony
I dont buy that Candyman is blacklisted because of the slavery themes, because it barely plays into Candyman's backstory. In the original film, Candyman, when he was human, was the son of a former slave but he was not a slave himself. Thats it, not much more beyond that.
4:59 Liked that blood meridian is mentioned that would be a good video considering it was one of the most popular literature made especially its villain, also I’m sure candyman wouldn’t be blacklisted because it of slavery themes as well as slenderman when people actually want them in the game. Would like to see a blood meridian video one day after all we got Sadako from the novel.
Fnaf being announced as soon as it was acquired would make sense why the announcement post looked so low effort and they announced it out of nowhere because they knew that's what the fans gave been wanting. Also candy man not being in dbd due to slavery doesn't sound too far fetched as 1. The black face bubba incident probably showed them how toxic people will use these themes and 2. If I remember correctly wasn't there a leak before hound master came out that the original concept had something to do with slaves and the dev team got uncomfortable with it to a point they just changed it
Maybe these leaks about Tokyo Ghoul are lies, but through interesting possible-easter eggs I have seen in other videos and all these statements, I do sort of believe that TG is the next chapter. About Outlast, I really do want it in, as well as my brothers!
In terms of slavery themes, yea sure dude, they'll deny candyman because slavery themes, but they keep 2011 Freddy, a child m-er. I find that hard to believe.
i thought his reply to "is there any part 2 chapters being considered?" being "idk about *2*", with 2 being in italics, is quite interesting. what does this imply? Resident Evil PART 3?!
RE does have a lot of characters to choose from. I'm personally rooting for Lady D. But at the same time, I don't want it for a while. No other chapters have a chapter 2 yet, & adding a 3rd RE chapter while no others have 2, feels a bit like over kill Maybe they were implying cosmetics? Becca & Ada need more outfits
I dont buy the leaks because if we get a Survivor for Jurassic Park, its gonna be either one of the various main characters or the kids in either series. Not to mention everything else they've said plus regurgitating info we know or has been popular.
It's not going to be the kids. None of the characters in this game are kids. Though, I agree, that a survivor would more likely be one of the main guys like Alan or Ellie, or Owen or Claire
I never expected behaviour to want cry of fear in DBD, thats my most wanted chapter ever imagine being able to play as the killer and survivor and have them both be the same person just with different personality's.
Wait that can't be Right, I'm gonna do the math for fun RE: Its actually 10 characters I think, you probably forgot Hunk and Birkin Silent Hill: 6 characters, 7 if you count Alessa Gillespie skin Stranger Things: 4 characters only pretty obvious Alan Wake: To be a survivor only chapter it has 3 characters, 4 if you count mr scratch but that isn't really legendary skin And after that I think all other licenses only have 3 or less characters
Imagine blood meridian in Dbd. The judge as the killer and the Kid as the survivor (adult). I know behavior will not allow it into there game cause of reasons.
@ I know, he an adult later on the book and they can use that instead. Besides that will be one hella of a chapter in DBD and definitely will spark major conversation and controversy. Imagine if they do add that in DBD?
Does anyone know where to exactly see what might be mike and the mystery thing bottom right? Like what structure's or items they're by? I managed to find Englund but for the life of me I can't find the other 2.
If Candyman as a license is actually "blacklisted by Behaviour" for "muh slavery themes" then that is TRULY one of the dumbest things ive heard regarding Behaviour 🤣 spoken like the true woke trash company they are, that is LAUGHABLY pathetic 🤡
I doubt Candyman is blacklisted like this "leaker" says. BHVR put it in the survey because they're interested & considering it as a chapter. Plus the game has tons of dark stuff in it already. Aliens that forcibly impregnate you, cults, abuse, murder, child murder, kidnapping, torture. We even have pedo Freddy, just to name a few. They wouldn't stop at "slavery"
If Fnaf does crazy numbers, I'm expecting them or Bendys Creator to reach out to them to try again as a chapter. Plus this year is really shaping up to be bendys biggest year.
@@Dhampire1976unlike bendy, fnaf went backwards and turned into a kids franchise thanks to steel wool, what brought it back into the horror genre was into the pit. On the other hand bendy has sent down a way darker path and now the ink demon has a more horrific design thanks to the dark revival.
Fnaf makes sense it’s gone full on mainstream, bendy is still sort of niche and just hasn’t had enough recognition to make it up to the ranks of horror classic like fnaf has so as cool as the ink demon is he’s SUPER unlikely imo
a lot of reasoning he gave is otter bs like candy man is black listed bc there are slavery themes in it knight lore heavily revolve around slavery he was an Hungarian slave before getting free and becoming a knight,freddy Kreuger that is in the game is a literal pdf and ect.... i another thing is like Freddy's license if they ever want to bring roberts freddy it would be a different killer bc the devs themselves said before with vecna l think he's just looking for attention
I hope this person is not actually an insider. It would be devastating to learn that we never have an actual chance to get Candyman. It would especially awful if we found out that they had a chance to do Candyman before Tony Todd passed and they didn't because of sensitive themes.
i think is right decision make fnaf chapter only with 1 survivor,because others is gonna be legend skins,henry and vanessa,so maybe we gonna get 2 maps
What I am going with after hearing all of this: True: Tokyo Ghoul is confirmed. Jurassic Park is confirmed Classic Freddy is Confirmed FNAF will be a full chapter, but something spooked bhvr into an early announcement. Likely True: Slenderman, Candyman, Jeepers Creepers on Ban list Stephen King monsters never coming Hunter from Jurassic park is Survivor Surveys are pretty useless Terrifier/F13 are likely next year.
How can classic Freddy be confirmed? OG Freddy & 2010 Freddy are owned by different licenses, no? They can't put licenses on top of licenses. Licenses are their own thing or are only put on DBD Og characters. Did the Freddy license change? Also Candyman isn't blacklisted. It was on the most recent survey, so they're interested & considering it. Also slavery isn't a reason to blacklist it, because Daniel Robitaille wasn't a slave owner, & also wasn't advocating slavery. Plus plenty of people want Candyman in the game, & Tony Todd also liked the idea, since he hearted a commented about someone mentioning Candyman being in DBD. There's also plenty of dark stuff in the game like aliens forcibly impregnating people, torture, abuse, murder, kidnapping, child murder, cults, vulgarity, general gore, sexual undertones, even Pedo Freddy. & that's just mentioning a few off the top of my head. They wouldn't just draw the line at slavery
I just want to point out the identity they chose to share the leaks. 2017x is a character who has convinced himself that he IS Sonic The Hedgehog despite being a fake. That's the very very basics of the character. I don't know if the leaker just took them on cuz they like the character or if there's something more to that. Who knows haha
In my honest opinion I wouldn’t shove this guy out for being a “fake leaker” because some of the stuff he says could be true, some of them might be fake but if most are correct like the Freddy rework or Micheal Afton being the survivor then we could possibly trust him
A lot do seem odd, but I could agree with you. Maybe he was told false information from the company, as well as some true info. Not every company worker knows everything, so there could be a partially lying deeper insider.
If we get a Robert Englund visceral/legendary then that can confirm or deny if they're credible imo since that should be provable 3-4 weeks after the Freddy ptb
I think getting Sam Jacksons character from Jurassic Park would be a good idea. Would be another good celeb collab and Id use him alone for voicelines.
Let’s be for real too, if Tokyo ghoul is a “anime test chapter” to see the possibility of anime coming to dbd. I think the community would love it however I think after 2 or 3 chapters people would be saying “u still have real life things to use like slender, candy man, etc…” So in truth I think just having a anime chapter will help people get the killers they want because people are going to want the real stuff before the pencil drawing… idk if that makes sense but that’s my head space with this.
Psycho would be good with the map being bates motel Also the shining would be good Clock tower map where there’s a clock tower you can go inside of you can go to the top
I’m begging for these “leaks” to be false. I don’t want to think that we could have had something Persona related. Persona 3 is one of my favorite games of all time.
@goodnight2931 from the modern trilogy Persona 3 is the "Edgiest" of them all. Plus with the remake recently I feel like Atlus would have used it for current crossovers.
BHVR: No slavery themed Killers allowed
Also BHVR: The only Predator chapter allowed is Remake Freddy
I mean, Alien joined, so Predator is definitely plausible! Those licenses are controlled by the same people.
@@braytonewell he meant like child predator, not THEE predator. In case you don't know, remake Freddy had his lore expanded upon with him being a child predator before becoming the dream demon.
Tbh alien DOES forcefully impregnate it's prey 💀@@ReactiveDeactive
@@ReactiveDeactive Ah, okay. Anyway, I do want a The Predator chapter, particularly from 2022's "Prey." Naru is too young, though. :(
A killer with a whip would be cool though.. It would have to be different than nemesis tentacle and Aliens tail strike. Maybe a centurion obvious choice would be a slave owner but they wouldn’t have the guts to do a theme like that.
Let's list all the evidence that this guy is just talking out of his ass
Number 1: Announcing the FNAF collab 3 days after it was all signed is utter bullshit. Scott was talking about it already a month prior on his socials
Number 2: He says that there are only 2 blacklisted IPs on BHVRs list, those being Candyman and Jeepers Creepers. BUT then he proceeds to say Slenderman is never coming because of the stabs and IT, The Shining, Cujo, or any other Stephen King property is also not coming, so which is it? 2 blacklisted or a shit ton?
Number 3: He said very early on that he couldnt talk about certain things due to legal reasons, but then proceeds to spill all the beans about every contract, every negotiation that happened, is happening and probably wont happen in the future like its no big deal.
This guy is making stuff up on the spot to get attention, and other credible leakers only said he is legit to generate hype or to get people like you off their trail or else they might get in trouble with BHVR
Jeepers Creepers I can 100% see that IP being blacklisted. It is a common fact the maker of those movies is a major child predator. So I could see why BHVR wouldn't want to ever put that IP into that game
Your first and third points are absolutely valid but the second could still be possible. Yes it’s not looking bright for any Stephen king properties to get into dbd but that doesn’t mean they’re blacklisted. There’s still a very small chance some make it but candyman and keepers have a 0% chance. However, a similar point to add to his fakeness is bringing up the controversy about the slenderman stabbings and that NOT being blacklisted, so I agree with you there for sure.
Plus he has Ruthless , who has been wrong more times than right, who is vouching for them
He might be an atttention seeker but if its true it really sucks since I really wanna see Candyman or It or Slender man in the game since there such cool killers (In my opinion and if the bad stuff didnt happen they would be even better)
@@trisdevision4550Stephen actually allows Videogames of his work,so it isn't valid
2017x is a HUGE liar. He constantly backtracked. First he said they got the FNAF license 3 days before the announcement, and then after being proven wrong, he backtracked and said "actually something happened 3 days before not the license." this dude is a fraud
"I can't talk about that for legal reasons"... Proceeds to answer every other question 😂
Yeah. Thats the part of the video where any sense of believability for this guy went straight down the drain.
Not saying everything they’re saying is wrong (especially the Tokyo Ghoul part), but I definitely suspect some of this is made up.
hesitant to trust this leaker on the account that they are claiming to know a lot of information in a broad scope of fields. for example, they somehow have information on the timelines that Mathieu Cote made deals with licensors , like netflix and scott cawthon, (which I feel would be classified information) but somehow don't have information on Freddy's rework (could be a defense strategy, since Freddy's rework will be revealed very soon, and that would give them up as lying very early).
they also subtly backtrack a couple of times. for example, when they claimed the fnaf collab was locked in 3 days before the announcement, then someone pointed out a collab reveal was hinted at more than 5 days before the announcement even happened, they then claimed that "idk, i got told 3 days this isnt from me"
the Candyman thing is also suspicious to me. Slavery is definitely taboo, but this game also has themes of torture, cult activities, technically pedophilia with Freddy, child murder with the FNaF chapter... I feel like banning an IP due to the influence slavery has on its storyline would be very strange, since this, at the end of the day is a game for adults... and even then, teenagers and even children learn about slavery in schools. I feel like it would be very different if Candyman tries to frame slavery as a positive, and it most certainly does not. Yeah, idk. As a whole I don't buy it. It's very easy to go into discords and claim you know information, by jumping on information that's already been supposedly leaked, and making up things that haven't been leaked yet.
Edit: I realize I didn't elaborate much on the "broad scope of information" points. but, I personally believe that given past leaks, information on future content is really only given to those who need to know about said content. So I find it bizarre this non-BHVR employee somehow knows what characters are coming in future chapters, has seen the model for the next killer, knows what maps are coming for FNaF... and then for some reason also have what is likely highly confidential information about the nature of these license deals, down to when they occurred, and which licenses have been put on a "blacklist"... yet don't have information on updates coming in the next month-- arguably content less interesting than any of the prior supposed leaks. just odd is all. to me this implies that this, again, non-employee would have to have not just a source on the inside, but MULTIPLE on the inside, all giving their information to the same person. weird.
Well you could argue that both a nightmare on elm street and FNAF deal with child murder so yeah, you could also argue pinhead with it’s sexual themes too
Hmm, I see your points. That does make me a little hesitant on them now as well.
Seems a little shady ysah
Plot twist, its Cotè himself and he’s a huge Shadow fan
Yep. This much specific information being revealed would definitely make it easier to pin point who is leaking information from within the company.
Absolutely fake. The stuff about the fnaf deal being signed 3 days before the announcement is legally and logically impossible. Scott talked about the collab almost a month in advance. This means the deal was already signed.
Absolutely. Additionally, the idea that Candyman would be blacklisted due to slavery themes or that Slender Man wouldn’t be considered due to the stabbings is ridiculous. These are horror characters that kill people, generally speaking. The amount of touchy themes and real life events that were inspired by IP’s already in Dead by Daylight (Bubba, Michael, Freddy, etc.) tells us that Behavior understands they’re working with fictional characters that aren’t known for being positive or uplifting. This isn’t a family game.
If Candyman weren’t to make it into DbD it would be because Tony Todd passed away. And I can’t honestly think of a good reason they wouldn’t bring Slender Man in other than potential licensing complications.
@@Shaneplicitythey gotta bring in Candyman. He is a horror legend. I know it's more of a hurdle now than it was before since Tony Todd has sadly passed away, but I know it can still be done.
@@asterix1912 I absolutely agree with you. I’m simply saying that if he weren’t to come into the game, Tony Todd not being able to voice him would be a bigger issue than “slavery themes”
Idk guys- BHVR seems really nervous about anything can be attributed to racism. Apparently the hound master was originally a White slave catcher and behavior stoped and said “why are we doing this?” Then proceeded to change her entire design and lore to be a Black woman pirate.
And this isn’t a new trend for them being nervous to touch anything that could be linked to racism. Don’t forget they removed the survivor masks from Leather face because racist people were wearing Claudette’s face and targeting Black streamers.
So them saying they don’t want to touch Candyman because of slavery themes sounds on brand for them. Do not take this as me agreeing with them, because I don’t- but I wouldn’t be surprised if this was confirmed.
As for slender man… While those real world events inspired horror icons, the horror icon of slender man inspired two young girls into stabbing their “friend.” It’s not the same thing.
The difference is that these other slashers were inspired BY horrific events, and in many cases it’s a LOOSE inspiration too, just look up LPN’s episode on Ed Gein… the real events are nothing like TCM, but Hollywood is Hollywood. The random sleep death of the Cambodian family’s that inspired Wes Craven to make NOES is nothing like what took place in the films. It’s loose inspiration to create the icons of horror that DBD is adapting into their game. I can 100% see the difference
@ I see what you’re saying.
First, the idea that anything in The Houndmaster’s lore is related to slavery is nothing more than a rumor. This was not confirmed to have ever been true.
Second, I wasn’t saying that crimes or events in reality inspired horror IP’s (though that has happened loosely, as you’ve mentioned), I’m saying that some of the iconic IP’s already in the game have inspired real life events and crimes just as The Slender Man mythos did.
For example, in 2012, Jake Evans (a real person) killed his mother and sister as he admitted to being inspired by Michael Myers. In 2004, Daniel Gonzalez went on a killing spree in London, and admitted that he was inspired by both Freddy & Jason. There are other examples too, these aren’t the only ones.
Despite these tragic real life events, Michael and Freddy are both still in the game. I don’t think the stabbings associated with Slender Man is enough to keep him out of the game. And I don’t say this in disrespect towards those affected by the real life events mentioned.
Rest in Peace Tony Todd. It was such a shame we couldn't have him voice Candyman for DBD before he passed. A true horror legend.
the movie exists. they can clean up existing audio
If they could do that, they wouldn't have to make a new voice for nemesis, or even new sound effects for pinhead based off his movie. @@ezra5737
@@Wayhoo he was a huge fan of the game too. He would have been more than exhilarated to partake in the roster.
RIP Tony, great actor, great person
> Clearly does not know how licensing and law surrounding it works
> Says "I legally can’t answer that" then proceeds to "leak" highly sensitive content?
> Make a ton of blanket statements and not give ONE concrete evidence
> Claims he knows what the Freddy rework is but refuse to spill the beans despite stating Springtrap’s entire power
> Gives obviously fake reasons behind BHVR not getting Slender and Candyman. Now, don’t get me wrong, I don’t think we will ever get Candyman, but there’s no way in hell they wouldn’t add Slenderman just because of a crime from 10 years ago. Also, Mathieu Cote has talked about Slendy before and didn’t even mention the crimes. Nobody gives a damn anymore, as they should, it wasn’t the creator’s fault what tragic events happened. And the slavery themes thing is just laughably fake.
This will go down as one of the dumbest "leaks" in the history of dbd I’m afraid 😂
Yeah, absolutely fake
Not only is the fnaf license deal being made 3 days before the announcement impossible, but blacklisting candyman for having slavery themes while allowing reboot freddy who is canonicaly a child predator, and also allowing fnaf wich is litterary about child murder is a VERY odd choice...
So they blacklisted Candyman for themes of Slavery, but they have 2010s Freddy, a Child Predator, and the Xenomorph, who literally has a stage in their lifecycle that forcibly impregnates beings (It's not in game, but still in Xenomorph lore)? Yeah, okay. I'm taking this with a huge grain of salt, but DBD already has a lot of themes such as cult activities, child murder, torture, etc, and I feel like blacklisting something for heavy topics such as slavery when topics just as heavy, if not more heavy are already in the game is very hypocritical, and that really rubs me the wrong way.
Like I said tho, take what this guy says with a huge grain of salt. The FNaF thing is also really strange to me since he backtracks when he's corrected about the reveal.
Yeah he’s fake.
Yeah, I agree. I don't see them blacklisting Candyman for that reason. Jeepers Creepers is the only license BHVR has blacklisted, and I feel that if Candyman was blacklisted they'd say that same as they did with Jeepers Creepers, especially since he seemed to imply that this was not BVHR's decision... Which the license holders I don't see why they'd be like "Oh Candyman used to be a slave so we can't legally let you have him." or whatever.
@@ragabashmoon1551 Yeah, Jeepers Creepers I actually understand, but Candyman just seems so out of left field to be blacklisted. And I see no reason why the license holders would do something like that. I do think it's possible that he could be right about some things and wrong about others, and if that's the case, I do think that he's wrong about the blacklisting.
@@RaynbowistLaney whys jeepers creepers blacklisted? I dont know anything about it
@@wizardly Because the creator of Jeepers Creepers is a convicted Child Molester
nah I can't believe this shit is that legit
the way they're deconfirming stuff like candy man is crazy when this game has a literal pedophile
It was the best they can do when it came to Freddy but yeah this so called leaker is very fishy about this,
springtrap is inevitable in dbd, he will arrive in summer
Other Breaking news, water wet
Damn that's crazy. So anyway humans need oxygen to breath
@@Dhampire1976 I walked outside today. I noticed the sky was blue. Did anyone else notice this crazy change??????
Oh gee I didn’t know thanks for the information captain obvious like bro almost everyone in the dbd community knows this no need to point that out
Springtrap is coming.
this leak is just repeating every leak before tbh, also the fact that Candyman being blacklisted as an ip kills this leak for me, It just seems so random especially since his name appeared on dbd surveys
"There are 2 Blacklisted chapters" Then proceeds to say that slenderman and postal is also banned cmon this guy is clearly talking out of his ass
Yes, I don't believe they would ever blacklist Candyman. For slavery? That's just nitpicking. We have a bunch of other licenses with mature themes. We literally have pedo Freddy. We're getting Springtrap, a child murderer. We have Pinhead, & the movies have very sexual tones. There's a cultist survivor. The list goes on. Plus they know Candyman is wanted. I love the topics of leaks & rumours, I find them interesting & engaging, but some of the rumours from this person are very... random indeed
i mean the knight was a slave and his lore revolves around slavery @goodnight2931
Basically, it’s combination of piggybacking and blanket statements
eeehhhh… they said they’d never add a clown killer or a non human character so i think they’re trying to gauge interest
I'm rooting for a Candyman chapter. I really like seeing Pinhead, who is another killer from Clive Barker's stories, in DbD and it would be great to see Candyman too.
Eeehhhh, Robert's Freddy being mentioned makes it pretty difficult to believe it, even if I want to
Ey we can dream right?
Pun intended.
I would love that to happen!
That would make me become a Freddy main again lol I love Og Freddy
FNaF couldn't have been grabbed 3 days before the announcement because the schedule for the 10th anniversary was released in June, 2 months before the announcement
How could Scott announce a surprise collab which was meant to be DBD on June 19th but give the license to BHVR on July 31st?
If Candyman is blacklisted due to the slavery theme, then why would BHVR try? Sounds awfully contradictory.
because of their weird communtiy either they're all toxic or js sensitive as hell 😭
@@Hazay9thbecause slavery is a fucked up topic and dbd players overreact to everything, People got pissy at unknowns skins and they forged up some DEI bullshit when a killer was a black woman
Especially with Freddy being a literal pedo, I don’t see why they’d shy away from Candyman just because of slavery especially when that’s just his origin and how he became Candyman it’s not his whole story at all, and there’s even more story if they also get the rights to the 2021 sequel
Wait a minute Plus wasnt he on a recent survey? lol yea I call BS 😂
Candyman is not blacklisted. This guy is fake news, it's pretty obvious.
@Hazay9th right, but I was just pointing out the contradiction in the "leaker's" statement, where he said that he was "blacklisted for the slavery theme, but BHVR tried to get him" in the exact same sentence
Source: Trust me bro, I saw it on a dream and someone else said so
A lot of the reasons this guy is giving is kind of…. odd? I don’t think Scott would rush out signing everything right before the anniversary. Idk something just seems off….
Fake. The info about FNAF tipped me off. It’s legally impossible for a collab to be signed 3 days before its announcement. The FNAF collaboration at least had to be a month or two in advance.
What about Frank Stone????? Doesn’t anyone think it will come in someday. I think terrifier would be way scarier than pennywise.
Seems like lost potential to not add him. Hopefully they do one day
I still think a grudge chapter would be sick.
You and me both
I really want the Grudge! We only have 2 license killers that are female, & we need some more. Would love Carrie too
I need heeeer, Carrie would be fucking sick, would be funny that her prestige bloody cosmetic it's actually her clean, cuz she's already covered in blood, but regarding all the bullshit the guy is telling, this is kinda right, Stephen is kinda difficult to get deals.
@goodnight2931 well yes, but if we were gonna get a Stephen King license, I would want it to be the shining. Jack Torrance would be a perfect and iconic killer, the overlook hotel as the map would be perfect for the game, unlike Carrie or IT, and the lobby music and chase theme would be legendary too. It's one of my biggest dream licenses
@asterix1912 Eh, While I like The Shinning, I think Carrie & Pennywise fit the game more than Jack.
This guy is so obviously fake. It's laughable how bad this is😂
Honestly fake, slender being denied due to stabbings would be considered blacklisted yet they only listed Candyman and JC as blacklisted
3:05 there would be no way they would add Jurassic park and not have Ian Malcom or Alan grant as the main survivor
Postal and Cry of Fear would be amazing to see! But I guess they would be waaay to edgy for current DBD.
I'm hoping for some more og horror licences like Psycho, Clocktower, Silent Night Deadly Night but I can't imagine any of them being added with DBDs current direction.
Postal easy solution it's use the Postal Dude from Postal 2.
(Just think in that he goes inside of entity mist for incident or for try to made the entity sign he's petition making that he's on the realm for the promise of had he's petition sign)
The only thing I 100% believe him on is IT. It's 100% true that Stephen King does not want video games made after he got burned by the horrific Lawnmower Man game.
Getting pennywise will be a hard one but I think if we get art the clown than maybe Stephan king would allow pennywise because he did have praise to art the clown
Yeah their only shot at Pennywise would have been snagging it before the rights reverted back to Mr. King
Wait so no candyman because of it's themes? That is so dumb
Hmm explains why they turned the houndmaster into a pirate instead of a slave owner, must because of their DEI consultent that they dont add Candyman.
@@k.m.k.2976, my brother in the entity, slavery is a fucked up topic. Do you seriously think people would be fine with that?
Also cut on the DEI bullshit. You don't even know what DEI stands for 💀💀
@k.m.k.2976 one of the most iconic horror icons played by a legendary actor and they say no because slavery? They have messed up things in lore but slavery is where they draw the line? I can see why they are so disliked
@burtonthegrape9217 2 things for this:
1: BhvR is playing safe, they hold so many licences and if they got into real big controversy they could risk licences.
2: Tony Todd is dead, I don't what else to say, he's fucking dead so we can't get the voice actor. Even if we did candyman it wouldn't sell the same
@@k.m.k.2976 Enough with the cringe "DEI" stuff you fools keep crying over. Immediately believing such obviously fake leaks shows your lacking IQ enough already.
Something’s odd about these “leaks”… 1) Candyman is so much more than the son of a slave, he’s an once good man turned into a monster, a tragic figure, a villain resembling more Dracula as the supernatural seductor rather than a common slasher… And if Behavior can touch subjects as horrifying as the MK Ultra, or the many crimes of remake Freddy, one’d think they’d be able to touch the tragic subject of slavery. It’s not like they’d be endorsing it. Jeepers Creepers is one thing because of that Victor Silva and his twisted, sick mind, but that argument of Candyman being blacklisted because of being related to slavery falls on its own. And if come the case they didn’t wanna risk it they could simply omit mentioning the part of him being the son of a slave, and just start the lore at his upbringing in the, to use Purcell’s words, “polite society”.
2) I love Robert Muldoon as much as the next person, but him being the instead of Alan Grant or Ellie? Back to the Candyman comparison, it’d be like if (ignoring the plot twist) instead of Helen as a survivor they’d have Trevor or Purcell.
3) Netflix gave back ST because of the pressure instead of money? What? Since when do they care?
4) Stephen King being a grouchy, old videogame hater with a massive ego are old news, and okay he'd not allow his book characters in the game, more power to him, I guess… But wouldn't the studios be able to license their adaptations of the characters? Hadn't Schmuckles said in the The Shining licensing situation video that the rights of the Kubrick adaptation (and let's be honest, the most iconic one) were still in the hands of WB? Or Pennywise, aren't they doing TV show and all?
5) And Predator not coming? I know you said it might be a joke, but if hypothetically had they been serious, why would Disney allow Grid to be a skin then?
To resume, I don't think this person is a legit leaker, and Ruthless may be trolling. There's too many holes on their arguments, I guess we'll find out in time.
Finally, bendy is getting mentioned 5:39
Well. There is Bendy and the Ink Machine movie in a works ❤
@@just_roo5483I KNOW❤, and did you know that DBD is not going to be the first horror game (but the second) that Scott has collaborated with and Springtrap also holds a axe in this game 0:46
It’s a Roblox horror survival game called: Pillar Chase 2 (idk why it’s called that if the first one doesn’t exist) and Springtrap has three abilities that lead him to guarantee kills in PC2. (Imagine if his power are the same abilities in PC2)
Candyman blacklisted for slavery themes but Freddy Krueger is in the game? Or even FNAF which is upcoming? Yeah, this guy is fake.
"Hellraiser isn't getting anything ever again"
"Bendys creators contact bhvr once" that is all thats confirmed. The rest could be fake
I don’t believe any leaker that has no info on anything we can actually confirm, u can’t convince me that u can get info on confidential licensing deals but can’t tell us anything specific about Freddy’s rework, also the Candyman thing sounds ridiculous, it’d be one thing if he was a slave owner but Candyman was the victim and is the biggest representation they could get FOR the black community, I assume it’d be more insulting to black people if Candyman wasn’t allowed in the game for being the VICTIM
So you're telling me that Scott signed in July 28th that Springtrap was going to be in DBD? Like... 3 days before revealing the schedule? That sounds so weird to me
I think it inevitable the art the clown will come to dbd, the director wants to get his name out into other forms of media and they can use the money paid for the license for and increased budget for the next film which the director obviously would want
I would really like Bendy in DBD
note how whenever a topic outside of what has been publically leaked by a reliable source is brought up, this "leaker" acts all confused and is like "idk its from another source i didnt hear about that etc etc".
very hard to believe this guy is a reliable source, if even one.
No Slenderman and Candyman?? It's a horror game, take some risk just like Damien Leon's Terrifer franchise.
2:55
Thats an inconsistency. If any of this is real then everything they’re saying they shouldn’t be able to say legally.
I’m calling BS cause of the candyman being blacklisted claim. So candyman does have themes of slavery but if you look into his backstory, slavery is not really a big factor into his backstory. 1. The man behind Candyman Daniel Robitaille wasn’t a slave, his father was a slave but Daniel wasn’t. He was actually a wealthy artist in the late 1800s. 2. Imo, candyman has more of a racial violence theme more than slavery bc Candyman wasn’t killed bc he was a slave but rather he was killed bc he fell in love with a white woman. So yea I’m not really buying that BHVR would blacklist Candyman due to Slavery themes when slavery is not a big factor in Candymans story
Exactly this. Nothing adds up about it. Plus it was in the most recent survey, so they're interested in it, & many people want it. Even Tony himself, hearted an insta comment about someone wanting Candyman in DBD. RIP Tony
I dont buy that Candyman is blacklisted because of the slavery themes, because it barely plays into Candyman's backstory. In the original film, Candyman, when he was human, was the son of a former slave but he was not a slave himself. Thats it, not much more beyond that.
I honestly just really want a silent hill tome
I dont think candyman would be blacklisted cause of the slavery themeing.
The Thing would be amazing!!! I love John carpenter stuff ❤😊
It Feels so weird to be this far in this games life and still not have Candy Man lol
If we get persona I’m going to freak out
The killer would be Adachi for sure
Same
6:08 wait postal wanted to be in the game?!?!?
Damn, BHVR can bag any license they want, but took 7 years to add an fov slider
4:59 Liked that blood meridian is mentioned that would be a good video considering it was one of the most popular literature made especially its villain, also I’m sure candyman wouldn’t be blacklisted because it of slavery themes as well as slenderman when people actually want them in the game. Would like to see a blood meridian video one day after all we got Sadako from the novel.
I would LOVE a Cry of Fear chapter or even just a skin for survivor
What about jason, dbd need jason asap.
Fnaf being announced as soon as it was acquired would make sense why the announcement post looked so low effort and they announced it out of nowhere because they knew that's what the fans gave been wanting. Also candy man not being in dbd due to slavery doesn't sound too far fetched as 1. The black face bubba incident probably showed them how toxic people will use these themes and 2. If I remember correctly wasn't there a leak before hound master came out that the original concept had something to do with slaves and the dev team got uncomfortable with it to a point they just changed it
*"Perks are done last minute." This explains a lot.*
Maybe these leaks about Tokyo Ghoul are lies, but through interesting possible-easter eggs I have seen in other videos and all these statements, I do sort of believe that TG is the next chapter. About Outlast, I really do want it in, as well as my brothers!
In terms of slavery themes, yea sure dude, they'll deny candyman because slavery themes, but they keep 2011 Freddy, a child m-er. I find that hard to believe.
4:57 Judge Holden as a killer would be dope.
He has gotten more popular recently, he would be hard to get out in the game.
I understand why they might not want Candyman but that is such a missed opportunity.
i thought his reply to "is there any part 2 chapters being considered?" being "idk about *2*", with 2 being in italics, is quite interesting. what does this imply? Resident Evil PART 3?!
RE does have a lot of characters to choose from. I'm personally rooting for Lady D. But at the same time, I don't want it for a while. No other chapters have a chapter 2 yet, & adding a 3rd RE chapter while no others have 2, feels a bit like over kill
Maybe they were implying cosmetics? Becca & Ada need more outfits
@goodnight2931 i personally feel someone like Jack baker, Heisenberg or Mr X would be better options
@@Platinum199 But there needs to be more licensed female killers. We currently only have 2 female license killers
@@fellowgibus6821 it has to be Mother Miranda.
@@fellowgibus6821 imagine if dead by daylight allows you to see Ethan's face, but Capcom doesn't. 🥴
I dont buy the leaks because if we get a Survivor for Jurassic Park, its gonna be either one of the various main characters or the kids in either series. Not to mention everything else they've said plus regurgitating info we know or has been popular.
It's not going to be the kids. None of the characters in this game are kids. Though, I agree, that a survivor would more likely be one of the main guys like Alan or Ellie, or Owen or Claire
I’ve never heard about the postal devs contacting behavior, can anybody provide a source?
I never expected behaviour to want cry of fear in DBD, thats my most wanted chapter ever imagine being able to play as the killer and survivor and have them both be the same person just with different personality's.
I just want candy man :/
I was thinking that what if all 8 RE characters were used in 2v8 literally only franchise in dbd with 8 characters
Wait that can't be Right, I'm gonna do the math for fun
RE: Its actually 10 characters I think, you probably forgot Hunk and Birkin
Silent Hill: 6 characters, 7 if you count Alessa Gillespie skin
Stranger Things: 4 characters only pretty obvious
Alan Wake: To be a survivor only chapter it has 3 characters, 4 if you count mr scratch but that isn't really legendary skin
And after that I think all other licenses only have 3 or less characters
@ I’m talking survivors being 8
Imagine blood meridian in Dbd. The judge as the killer and the Kid as the survivor (adult). I know behavior will not allow it into there game cause of reasons.
Feel like judge Holden would be a stand alone killer. If they did get the kid he would be an adult just like Youichi from ringu
@ I know, he an adult later on the book and they can use that instead. Besides that will be one hella of a chapter in DBD and definitely will spark major conversation and controversy. Imagine if they do add that in DBD?
I’d be so glad if the Jurassic Park one is legit, I was dreading the idea of getting Chris Pratt in the game because yuck
The candyman slavery themes aren’t even that present and you could always do the reboot instead
Ruthless said he's legit simply because he said he saw a model of Tokyo ghoul? 🤨
Does anyone know where to exactly see what might be mike and the mystery thing bottom right? Like what structure's or items they're by? I managed to find Englund but for the life of me I can't find the other 2.
Why are we giving this guy any credit this is so embarrassing
jeepers creepers being blacklisted makes sense being on there for only those who know
those who know💀
Reborn would be the best option because it doesn’t involve the original creator
If Candyman as a license is actually "blacklisted by Behaviour" for "muh slavery themes" then that is TRULY one of the dumbest things ive heard regarding Behaviour 🤣 spoken like the true woke trash company they are, that is LAUGHABLY pathetic 🤡
I doubt Candyman is blacklisted like this "leaker" says. BHVR put it in the survey because they're interested & considering it as a chapter. Plus the game has tons of dark stuff in it already. Aliens that forcibly impregnate you, cults, abuse, murder, child murder, kidnapping, torture. We even have pedo Freddy, just to name a few. They wouldn't stop at "slavery"
This is INSANE info ! True or not, even if most of his rumors are false, there has to be something that’s true right 👀
i love the community for eating netflix up to bring ST back 😂
If Fnaf does crazy numbers, I'm expecting them or Bendys Creator to reach out to them to try again as a chapter. Plus this year is really shaping up to be bendys biggest year.
Yeah,no. Keep that shit out of DBD. Fnaf earned it's right to be in the game. That slop hasn't
@@Dhampire1976 Agreed
@@Dhampire1976unlike bendy, fnaf went backwards and turned into a kids franchise thanks to steel wool, what brought it back into the horror genre was into the pit. On the other hand bendy has sent down a way darker path and now the ink demon has a more horrific design thanks to the dark revival.
@acrazyrabbit1980 Nobody wants bendy lmao
Fnaf makes sense it’s gone full on mainstream, bendy is still sort of niche and just hasn’t had enough recognition to make it up to the ranks of horror classic like fnaf has so as cool as the ink demon is he’s SUPER unlikely imo
this sounds so fucking fake
The only believable thing that came from thar guys mouth was us never getting anythinf Hellraiser ever again
NOOOOOOO! ANDREAS! Cry of Fear would have been so perfect in Dead By Daylight! 😭
Still praying we get it ngl.
a lot of reasoning he gave is otter bs like candy man is black listed bc there are slavery themes in it knight lore heavily revolve around slavery he was an Hungarian slave before getting free and becoming a knight,freddy Kreuger that is in the game is a literal pdf and ect.... i
another thing is like Freddy's license if they ever want to bring roberts freddy it would be a different killer bc the devs themselves said before with vecna l think he's just looking for attention
What you said about Freddy isn’t true
Warner still owns the name nightmare on elm street and the character of Freddy Kruger
I hope this person is not actually an insider. It would be devastating to learn that we never have an actual chance to get Candyman. It would especially awful if we found out that they had a chance to do Candyman before Tony Todd passed and they didn't because of sensitive themes.
i think is right decision make fnaf chapter only with 1 survivor,because others is gonna be legend skins,henry and vanessa,so maybe we gonna get 2 maps
2 maps Is unrealistic
@TrollMaster-z3b well if fnaf chapter gonna have only 1 survivor..that means 2 maps
Because Matthew say that fnaf chapter gonna be really big
What I am going with after hearing all of this:
True:
Tokyo Ghoul is confirmed.
Jurassic Park is confirmed
Classic Freddy is Confirmed
FNAF will be a full chapter, but something spooked bhvr into an early announcement.
Likely True:
Slenderman, Candyman, Jeepers Creepers on Ban list
Stephen King monsters never coming
Hunter from Jurassic park is Survivor
Surveys are pretty useless
Terrifier/F13 are likely next year.
How can classic Freddy be confirmed? OG Freddy & 2010 Freddy are owned by different licenses, no? They can't put licenses on top of licenses. Licenses are their own thing or are only put on DBD Og characters. Did the Freddy license change?
Also Candyman isn't blacklisted. It was on the most recent survey, so they're interested & considering it. Also slavery isn't a reason to blacklist it, because Daniel Robitaille wasn't a slave owner, & also wasn't advocating slavery. Plus plenty of people want Candyman in the game, & Tony Todd also liked the idea, since he hearted a commented about someone mentioning Candyman being in DBD. There's also plenty of dark stuff in the game like aliens forcibly impregnating people, torture, abuse, murder, kidnapping, child murder, cults, vulgarity, general gore, sexual undertones, even Pedo Freddy. & that's just mentioning a few off the top of my head. They wouldn't just draw the line at slavery
I just want to point out the identity they chose to share the leaks. 2017x is a character who has convinced himself that he IS Sonic The Hedgehog despite being a fake. That's the very very basics of the character. I don't know if the leaker just took them on cuz they like the character or if there's something more to that. Who knows haha
In my honest opinion I wouldn’t shove this guy out for being a “fake leaker” because some of the stuff he says could be true, some of them might be fake but if most are correct like the Freddy rework or Micheal Afton being the survivor then we could possibly trust him
A lot do seem odd, but I could agree with you. Maybe he was told false information from the company, as well as some true info. Not every company worker knows everything, so there could be a partially lying deeper insider.
A few diamonds in the rough
Damn I wish Candyman would have been in DBD
That 3 days shit doesn't make literally any sense, the "FNAF mystery collab" tweet was announced in early June IIRC.
So this is fake?
So wait is there still a chance for a postal chapter because it isnt blacklisted
This is down right depressing
If we get a Robert Englund visceral/legendary then that can confirm or deny if they're credible imo since that should be provable 3-4 weeks after the Freddy ptb
2017x also hinted that the license Behavior lost was Squid Game...
Wait, how?
Source?
Doesn’t matter since he doesn’t know anything
@goodnight2931 Source is I made it the f**k up
Im kinda bummed about Postal tbh
I think getting Sam Jacksons character from Jurassic Park would be a good idea. Would be another good celeb collab and Id use him alone for voicelines.
Would be cool to see bendy in dbd
Yeah, I highly doubt a Sonic.EXE fan would leak so much about this and backtrack so often and make up weird stuff.
cold... so cold...
Truth be told...
"perks are done last minute" bullhit, the knight's perks were done long before he was released, same with wesker.
0:44 so this is supposedly the springtrap model and a render of it?
Let’s be for real too, if Tokyo ghoul is a “anime test chapter” to see the possibility of anime coming to dbd. I think the community would love it however I think after 2 or 3 chapters people would be saying “u still have real life things to use like slender, candy man, etc…”
So in truth I think just having a anime chapter will help people get the killers they want because people are going to want the real stuff before the pencil drawing… idk if that makes sense but that’s my head space with this.
Psycho would be good with the map being bates motel
Also the shining would be good
Clock tower map where there’s a clock tower you can go inside of you can go to the top
I’m begging for these “leaks” to be false. I don’t want to think that we could have had something Persona related. Persona 3 is one of my favorite games of all time.
I personally preferred 4. I suppose it does have some horror elements. Can't speak of 3, since I never played it
@goodnight2931 from the modern trilogy Persona 3 is the "Edgiest" of them all. Plus with the remake recently I feel like Atlus would have used it for current crossovers.
If it’s persona chapter Adachi is killer no doubt out of any villain in the franchise
@@belial1821his mori is just him doing his signature TV shove.
Mf is that 2017X invading DBD 😂😂😂
I literally do not see anything in that photo other than the raptor and ken.
anything else just looks like a blurry mess