Is Radiation From Our Devices Dangerous? | Talking Point | Full Episode
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 янв 2022
- All electrical devices emit RadioFrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF EMFs), many times as a by-product of functioning. Some, like our phones and WiFi routers, use it to transmit signals.
Sales of EMF-shielding products in Singapore have seen a fourfold increase since 2016, illustrating the rising concerns people have about RF EMF. Host Steven Chia finds out just how much we’re exposed to RF EMF, if we should really be concerned and if anti-radiation devices do the job, they claim to do.
Watch more #TalkingPoint: • Talking Point | Full E...
About the show: Talking Point investigates a current issue or event, offering different perspectives to local stories and revealing how it all affects you.
================================================
#CNAInsider #CNATalkingPoint #Radiation #AntiRadiation
For more, SUBSCRIBE to CNA INSIDER!
cna.asia/insideryoutubesub
Follow CNA INSIDER on:
Instagram: / cnainsider
Facebook: / cnainsider
Website: cna.asia/cnainsider
Other points to ponder about is where did the guidelines come about. Were the studies conducted by these devices' companies and then submitted to health boards to be used as reference for the guidelines? History has told us that there would be a conflict of interest if this is the case. The cigarette companies were trying to convince the consumers that cigarettes is safe back then. Similarly, petroleum companies were also promoting leaded fuel and saying that they are safe. All were later proven to be untrue.
😲
We were also told that wearing a face mask was safe and effective when it's scientifically been proven false. (Dr Vernon Coleman's channel - BNT). Stop the virtue signalling cuz it looks ridiculous.
@@Jesuswasnojew My picture? Not promoting anything. Just conveniently created to protect my identity during a period when mask wearing was compulsory. What is 411? It looks silly and meaningless to me.
Opiates was promoted as non addicting. Baby powder is cancerous, benedryl can cause alziemers, Hersheys has a dangerous amount of lead in their chocolate... like obviously companies don't care about the people.
exactly
Some of those anti radiation devices have actually been found to contain actual radiation material in them. They were all over Amazon at one point and got pulled
They contained thorium which is a radioactive element, the irony is that they are advertised as stopping electromagnetic radiation actually expose people to nuclear radiation.
That's ironic. A so called 'anti-radiation' device actually contains radioactive materials which pose an actual danger to your health. Much more than using a mobile phone.
I really looked into that industry, all the “scientic studies”=etc is pure entertainment forth gullble. “The effctvnws of our rare earth radiation harmonizing device can’t be measured, but we employed a team of scientists to develop the pendant and they assure that it works.”
Hahaha In last 10-20 years they- corrupt laying WHO- lifted healh denger points RADIATION LIMIT from 100 befoure to NOW 100 000... So healh standards are now Bullcrap for ZOMBIS , Use your brain !!! Check this info your self on internet.
mf criminals
Appreciate your time to put this together. It was highly educational.
Yes, very informative. Dr. Devra Davis is a top researcher in the field. Another great researcher is Dr. Magda Havas. I would be more cautious than the host though. My wife and I sleep much better since we shielded our bedroom. We didn't get much benefit from pendants and such. They're giving people a false sense of security.
@@love_for_truth, Devra Davis is a quack and a charlatan. She is paid to sew Russian Psy-Op information.
@@love_for_truth, I can guarantee that the "shielding" in your bedroom is purely psychological in its "function":
You think it works, so you feel better. In reality, it does nothing.
@@love_for_truth The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)Trusted Source has classified non-ionizing EMFs in the radiofrequency range as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. These fields are produced by electronic products like cellphones, smart devices, and tablets.
Very helpful! Thanks for the information
So nice that Apple and Samsung start removing wired headphone jacks...
I'm wondering...what about Bluetooth?
@traciewalker8506 They both have bluetooth connection capability.
@@Jorge01234I think she meant is Bluetooth safe
@@FiveDrexler Something that a lot of people might not consider is of there are cellular or radio antennae near where you live. Higher cancer rates have been recorded in such areas so this is something that already has been studied.
You can plug in an adapter into the charge port. Or get buds with a plug that fits the charge port
SO smart and charming this Venkat guy, wish to meet in person!!!
he got wife or not? you too late hahaha
Absolutely informative content. Thanks.
Always in-depth and informative . Love the series CNA insider!
Bull sh.t propaganda for the Naive.?
I find it interesting that they only tested blocking materials that did not work. There are many that do work. But they can reflect signals and make exposure worse. Avoidance is better.
@@GrowmapQ-Disc from Premier Research Labs does work on phones (I know, because I'm sensitive) but it won't do anything for all the other sources. So avoidance still is key.
@@mikuspalmis, nope. None of the "blockers" work to do anything meaningful. Some of the "blockers" actually use radioactive substances which will cause real harm.
@@Growmap, most of the "blocking materials" don't work. If you paid attention, you would have seen that it is all safe, so stop worrying.
OMFG! One tiny group is absolutely worried! RUNAWAY! RUN AWAY!
Where are the cited long-term, double-blind studies?
What frequencies have impact?
Anyone remember the cancer fearmongering about high voltage power lines decades ago?
Where are the comparisons to solar radiation?
Where are the physical data of cellular damage?
Where are the time-based physical recovery results?
This vid is indeed a "Talking Point".
An important fact that was either omitted or not understood.... the video stated that because the exposure levels fall within international "safety" guidelines it is safe. These guidelines were established by the military and telecom industry over 26 years ago and only protect from levels high enough to cause heating of tissue as this was originally believed to be the only possible harm from microwave radiation exposure. However, there have since been thousands of published studies showing biological harm (DNA damage, oxidative stress, insomnia, depression, in addition to tumor formation) at levels hundreds and thousands of times below the level of exposure that is high enough to heat tissue. The decision by the U.S. federal safety regulatory agency the FCC to maintain their obsolete, thermal only guideline was found to be "arbitrary and capricious" for ignoring the growing body of evidence showing harm at much lower levels of exposure. (See ruling in the US DC Circuit EHT v. FCC).
Therefore, it is not correct that exposure levels at or below the international "safety" levels are protective of public health. The FCC is now legally required to re-assess these guidelines and show the U.S. federal court system that the current "thermal only" assumption about microwave radiation is still valid in light of decades of published research conclusions to the contrary.
You are absolutely wrong. Electronics operate using EM waves in the radio range which is definitely non-ionising ergo not carcinogenic. The power levels used cannot even heat tissue unless you are extremely close to a cell tower. Not convinced huh? Ok then, think about this: You are exposed to infrared radiation which has a shorter wavelength than microwave radiation every time you are near a hot object, and if you use a stove or heater you are exposed to high power levels day in and day out. Now are you going to tell me that these too can cause cancer? The mechanism in which ionising radiation(begins at UV light) damages DNA is by having enough energy(measured in electronvolt) to remove electrons from DNA molecules and causing unwanted changes in its sequence. Non-ionising radiation does not have enough energy to be carcinogenic. As for the papers they are probably extremely flawed in their methodologies and I wouldn't expect you to be able to discern between truth and fiction. So what explains higher incidence rates? Environmental pollutants due to industries and modern products, e.g. microplastics, edcs, pesticides, heavy metals etc, excessive consumption of junk food, lack of consistent physical activity. Instead of letting your imagination run wild, try to study and think critically so you do not get duped by false informarion.
@@kiyoponnn The most reliable research was the $30 million U.S. National Toxicology Program 10 year study to determine whether cell phone radiation causes cancer. The peer reviewed final conclusion was that the study results showed "clear evidence" or cancer and DNA damage. All at levels below that causing heating. The study was replicated by the Ramazzini Institute at levels much lower than that of the US NTP study. Studies dating back to the 1970s have been compiled by the US Navy showing biological harm from radar at levels far below heating. It's typical of industries (tobacco, cell phone, pesticides, etc) to simply say that a study showing harm must have had design flaws. The science is growing documenting that the belief (opinion) that non-ionizing radiation is not strong enough to cause harm other than heating of tissue is no longer accurate.
@@cindyfranklin1680 I would appreciate links to the studies that you are referring to
Sources please?
@@pingdragonify just sent links in comment to Kiyopon
Super informative. Thank you.
Very informative! Thank you ❤
I have heard about SAR around 4 or 5 years ago where a state in USA is made to display SAR information in mobile store so people are aware of what they are purchasing.
I watched the full show and it has some really good info.
@@etutorshopcan you tell me the name of the show?
If only I could get my wife to watch and listen to an informative video like this for more than a minute.😕
Same why are they so opinionated and arrogant about it cant even talk about it without getting super assy no logical reasoning its like trying to reason with religious fanatic your going to hell for not believeing there beliefs and thats A FACT🤔
@@jaygopinath1694gonna have to buy a emf reader and do it live in front of them
11:10 inside the house, you are protected against the "virus" without a mask, but outside you have to wear a mask 😂
Thanks 👍 always use tips
Very informative with scientific analysis.
thank you very much for this video and your painstaking research
Putting it in Airplane mode reduces radiation. ❤
DAR NU O ELIMINA ...
1st time viewer of your channel, enjoy watching and learning, tqvm. love your antics car
Hey Prof Venkat and prof YY! Nice show!
Omg i requested this tyyyyy
This video is amazing just the way you told it thank you and can you please explain wireless watchs please hope you read this.
You should do another instalment of this with better products and meters. You also need to block radiation by default and see the difference in your sleep, cognition, well-being, awareness, etc...
What do you think?
He actually used one of the best meters possible.
As a doctor my self & high mobile user I observed
1. Using phones causing hand bone pain sometimes
2. I observed when I'd headache closer the phone giving more irritation to body even without using it.
3. People who are techies/ high mobile users have lower forearm muscle circumference & increased forearm span (attophy/ hypotrophy)
4. sometime holding phone giving Tingling sensation (irritation to nerves)
5. Sensing heating on thighs while in pocket (especially with Android phones)
Yet not enough researches are published regarding these safety usage in different people with different settings (besides Call usage & distance ) there should be safety check while heavy usage (like gaming, multitasking, while on high temperature)
Never put your phone on your body.
The tingling sensation is the microwaves from the phone cooking your skin. The only reason it doesn't cook it faster is because it is pulsed. Much like toughing your hand to a hot stove pipe. You'd be amazed at how many time you can touch you hand to the pipe, pull it away and do it again without burning yourself.
Doctor, I have been suffering from head pressure, dizziness, weak muscles, wobbly legs and heavy feeling in legs, insomnia, agitation, change of taste with some food. I think it may be a radio wave military grade weapon being targeted on me. Research "Targeted Justice". Trying to figure out how to protect myself.
@@raythornburg2791RemindMeLater this is false. Microwaves are always pulsed. They have a specific frequency (wavelengths are in micrometers). The reason your phone doesnt cook you like your microwave is that the microwave radiation has way higher amplitude, as well as a set frequency, being the resonance frequency of water, to heat water more efficiently. Also they havea faradaic cage to keep all EMF-waves inside of it, and reflect it perfectly so you get standing waves inside the faradaic cage. Even if your phone constantly emitted an EMF at the same frequency as a microwave 24/7, it couldnt heat you comparable to the microwave, because the amplitude is way too low, especially if you arent even focussing the EMF with a faradaic cage.
Hahaha In last 10-20 years they- corrupt laying WHO- lifted healh denger points RADIATION LIMIT from 100 befoure to NOW 100 000... So healh standards are now Bullcrap for ZOMBIS , Use your brain !!! Check this info your self on internet.
These standards are written by the cell phone companies. Just like the pharmaceutical companies financing the CDC, there is a conflict of interest.
YEP EXACTLLLY the fact that many ignore this fact iis astounding reallly !!
@@suzieque4222, except that it is _not_ fact. Government agencies, not the cell phone companies, set the guidelines. This was based on hard data.
@@topherkrock not what I have researched and found to be true !!
@@suzieque4222, but you haven't done any research or found the truth.
@@suzieque4222, it is very clear to me that you have neither done any research nor found any truth.
Hmm. Sunlight is of a way higher frequency than that of our devices.
Sunlight is a natural frequency where if we spend sufficient time in it it will help us thrive. This is a constant stream of millimeter waves pounding us 24/7......
Good point.
Skin cancer comes to mind
Indeed, prolonged exposure from sunlight especially in the Equatorial region like SG increase skin cancer risk.
What heats you up quicker. The sun or microwaves. What gives more people skin cancer? Animals adapted to microwave radiation before the dinosaurs walked the earth.
At last ! Something that makes clear about my radiation dilemma
It’s safe. Visible light is more dangerous. Light actively heats you up the moment you step into it, yet we live around it everyday, because it’s non ionizing.
I live in the USA am I safe?
@@lilo5629 , completely. Only fools worry about this stuff.
@@lilo5629 No you are not. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)Trusted Source has classified non-ionizing EMFs in the radiofrequency range as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. These fields are produced by electronic products like cellphones, smart devices, and tablets.
How about smart streetlamps that Singapore has been trying to introduce? I think the Dutch or Danes have introduced them to a great degree in their capital. Do they have a collective effect?
The guidelines come from the manufacturers of these RF emitting devices. They have a strong voice in formulating the guidelines.
Exactly, the "safe threshold" is exponentially higher than it should be.
Wrong, they come from government agencies. In the EU, CENELEC is responsible for the threshld values of EMF emitting devices such as phones.
@@dankrigby5621 In the U.S. it is controlled by the phone companies. Pure corruption.
Actually, the guidelines did not come from the manufacturers. Thank you for being dishonest, "Patchoe8014".
@@topherkrock Effective they do. There is tons of corruption in the regulatory bodies. They are controlled by the companies.
Overall, this is a good review, Steve.
You should be more worried about having a car accident in that old car than RF exposure, no air bags or crumple zones....
Wish you measured airpods and earbuds too! Since those are pretty much used very very close to our brains 🧠
Rather than i should be concern on radiation, i think i should concern on frauds who sell fake items more
That has to be the stupidest statement I ever heard
@@lynndavis2884 Considering EMFs are not dangerous, not really.
dumb npc@@arp-oy6vc
@@lynndavis2884, _your statement_ is the example of itself.
IEEE Std C95.1-2019, which is one of the most relevant standard for for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz only guarantee protection against electrostimulation or overheating. However, from the Note 8 of the standard itself, it is quite clear that other potential harmful effects are not considered, simply because hard to demonstrate. In fact, WHO also indicated that, “IARC has classified radio frequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), a category used exactly when a causal association is considered credible, but when chance, bias or confounding cannot be ruled out with reasonable confidence.”
I fully agree, that many 'gadget' for sale are not actually effective, but I believe very reasonable to reduce exposure to radio frequencies, as simply we do not know enough about its impact on our health.
Most of them are bad and most people believe they are safe. What a braindead planet this is.
Dar nu vorbim de ZGOMOT =acele frecvente secundare foarte nocive corpului omenesc ! In sfarsit anul acesta a fost lansata o inventie la care 5 ingineri de sunet au lucrat 15 ani si au creat dispozitivul si metoda de suprimare a zgomotului fara a suprima comunicatia .. daca vrei detalii VEZI ASTA 🥰 ruclips.net/video/R_RtDBooOTw/видео.html
Her face when he calls that prism a cube 🤣
2:50 frequency spectrum ionization
3:50 Specific Absorption Rate
5:00 research 📱 radiation
7:40 emf
9:10 bands
10:45 distance is your friend
13:30 interview Uni of Melbourg
15:50 insights
19:00 test
Thanks bud!
useful information
Great public service!!! Thanks for this. Great job!
those earpods inside your ear also emit RF EMF.
"When I ask Dr Davis she didn't have specifics.." LOL
One can only wonder how flawed her logic is
@@Denver_____, there's no wondering, she literally contradicts herself in one, run-on sentence!
Davis was featured prominently in a controversial 2016 episode of the Australian TV program Catalyst, in which she claimed "every single well-designed study ever conducted finds an increased risk of brain cancer with the heaviest users [of mobile phones]".[52][53][45] The episode drew heavy criticism from researchers, and Davis' claims were refuted by public health scholar Simon Chapman, who claims there is no evidence of increase brain cancer rates in Australians, as well as Rodney Croft, a commissioner with the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, who called the views of Davis "a fringe position that is not supported by science."[45]
Davis claims that radiation from 5G wireless technology poses health risks,[5][22] and BBC Radio 4 has called Davis one of the most influential scientists in 5G-opposition movements.[21] An excerpt of a lecture by Davis was used by new-age conspiracy promoter Sacha Stone in his 2020 film 5G Apocalypse: Extinction Event.[54]
this thing will be easier if Apple doesn't start the trend to remove 3.5mm headphone jack a few years ago
Apple needs to squeeze more $$ out of its customers thru the AirPods
@@simiknang6775which microwave your brain!! I used to listen to music with those ear buds quite a lot and had constant tinnitus. Stopped using them for a couple of weeks and no more tinnitus!!
Am still ticked off!
Horrible decision
The best series ever
Hope 🇮🇳 media learns
If the phone put in the chamber is isolated from the EMFs from the outside, how can you successfully call that phone ?
you cant, loses it signal to receive or give. Its like puting phone on airplane mode. try it
just a NORMAL cap, and you line the inside with aluminium foil it works like the "Baby Bennie" for
Or you could lined the outside and look like conspiracy theorist 🤣🤣 j.k
How about "Is reading a book, using a phone or watching TV too close and also while lying down, harmful for our eyes?"
Yes it is still harmful for our eyes
19:40 That's why Magneto wears a helmet bruh...
haha his is more complex then that
be blessed
So many snake oil 😅 thanks for the testing on those products 👍👍
great for me, i can go for days without touching my phone. one time my friend thought i was dead just because i didnt respond to his message for a day and a half.
You didn't cover Bluetooth devices like trackers, headphones. Even HPB now want us to sleep with their Bluetooth trackers to monitor our sleeps
U ought to be scared of the sun cuz they emit higher radiation energy than ur small trackers
@@ClaraFlater_than_surface_board Sun energy is a different topic. Theirs is in ionising spectrum, the UVs
@@SuccessforLifester visible light is in the non-ionising spectrum. Only higher frequencies of UV light are in the ionising spectrum. Even IF (hypothetically) visible light is ionising, the point is that higher frequencies are more likely to damage cells and DNAs and thus, visible light, being of higher frequencies than those waves emitting from the devices, should be of more concern. But ironically, people do not seem as concerned about sunlight.
@@kstey5872 Yes I am referring to the UVs not the visible light. This is an area of discussion for another topic. The topic here is on low frequency high wavelength radiation, which covers Bluetooth devices. With Bluetootht rackers and earphones so common now, I thought they would cover it.
@@SuccessforLifester The topic here is about the impact of radiation on human health. The ionising and non-ionising frequencies are on the same spectrum and not two independent unrelated concepts.
Moreover, bluetooth operates on 2.4ghz band which means that when they cover wifi on both 2.4ghz and 5ghz, they have essentially talked about bluetooth.
I'm curious about How the communication tower emits a radiation on safety?
Radiation makes it sound scary but it's like the same thing as radio. Technically light is radiation.
As of now, there are 11 plastic band wearers. lol
Interesting video and the watts/sq. meter value testing was revealing. However, as a long time electrical engineer, we were taught in power quality testing schools that another dangerous value to consider is milligauss strength. This results from usually only 60 Hz electrical fields produced in the proximity of electrical conductors carrying current in only one direction; isolated from a return or neutral current conductor. If a reading of more than 3 or 4 MG was measured; it was cause for health concerns because now we're measuring MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH, or FLUX as we say in power engineering circles.
This effectively would be like sticking your head between 2 coils of a large transformer. Now you have these electric fields impacting the body's own fields and the cells within. This is a huge oxidative and cellular disruptive force. Now cells and nerves cannot transmit biochemical signals in the body for it's normal processes. Now you have deterioration of the body's electrical and chemical pathways by disrupting the electrolytic path found in certain key minerals of the body; like potassium, sodium, phosphorus and magnesium. This will eventually cause serious illnesses to develop if immersed in these frequencies for hours a day.
I will confess, that I am NOT A COMMUNICATIONS OR ELECTRONIC ENGINEER; who likely has a deeper grasp of the power within gigahertz high frequencies. I must add though, that not everything that emits EMR is a radio frequency, or RF. Keep that in mind. We grew up in the 50's 60's and 70's watching TV with over the air antennas that transmitted VHF and UHF frequencies at a level FAR BELOW TODAY'S NETWORKS AND router or cell phone frequencies. I know that ultimately, it's the power level, expressed in watts within a specified space; that makes the difference in toxicity to the human body. Also, the higher the frequency of the wave, the greater chance for inducing electrical current in a nearby object. Fundamental EE science teaches us that when designing transformers.
But people have a right to be concerned these days, as even the 3G and 4G cellular and network frequencies are being shown to have harmful effects on humans; when immersed in these all day long, or by holding a phone close to your head and storing it in your pockets near your organs. This new 5G rollout needs to be stopped! These are military grade millimeter waves that burn our outer skin and tissues very quickly.
I will keep researching more on the effects of modern wireless internet signals and cell phone signals; as studies outside the politically controlled United States FCC in other countries are revealing disturbing facts proven to harm human health. Thank-you for this interesting and informative video!
But in reality things are much more complicated than that. Wireless HD video is serious engineering challenge (partly) because the high frequency signals necessary to provide the appropriate bandwidth tend to bounce off the walls. At really high frequencies (i.e. ~60 GHz) necessary for such applications other absorption/reflection phenomena can compromise transmission: e.g. absorption by oxygen (in the air). This depends very much on the medium through which your wave needs to go through.
higher frequencies aren't able to go better through walls than low frequencies. All are tested as SAR, all are measured in inverse square law
@@walther89 Interesting. Thanks for that insight.
This video put me at ease!!! Thank you!!!
You research is in depth and highly insighful and trustworthy. Funny RUclipsrs like Mr beasts not useful random videos gets 100s of millions views, that is 1000 times more than what this video got. I just wonder how do you monetize or make money from this video?
Have you had symptoms such as fatigue, headaches, poor memory, difficulty sleeping, and lack of clarity in your thoughts? It may seem like these could be the results of daily stress and frenzy, but there could be another culprit. All of these are symptoms of electro-sensitivity, which is something that more and more people find themselves affected by. Studies conducted in 1997 found "less than a few cases (of electro-sensitivity) per million", however now as much as 2.5% of the population is affected by electro-sensitivity. Even with the most moderate calculations, electrosensitivity is 10,000 times more common today than it was 20 years ago. Why could this be?
Electro-sensitivity and its symptoms appear to be triggered by certain microwave frequencies of electromagnetic radiation. Due to their high frequency, microwaves allow for higher transmission rates and smaller antenna sizes, which is perfect for high-tech devices that are constantly getting smaller and faster. These are devices such as cell phones, tablets, laptops, and any device that can connect to Wi-Fi, which can now include TVs and refrigerators
I wanna know the theories on those anti EMF tools. Bc rocks are grounding, so I think if the signal was smaller than the rock it would block it. But idk about the other tools, like the bracelet.
If you ever got cancer or any other health problems from your electronic devices, just keep a copy of this video and tell your doctor that this bumbling engineer told you it was safe to use and there is nothing to worry about. Just remember that each country has different safety levels depending on the bribery received by the regulatory agencies from Telecom companies.
id be dead already. oh wait im here still everything is fine. Can sleep. Just look at your health and lifestyle. Turn all your light bulbs off and cut or lines. Then youll be happy i guess. and Dont go outside.
How would you know that the reason would be the electronic devices and not some other parts of the lifestyle?
What is your gripe exactly? Because he didn't put out a video that confirms your narrative he's a bumbling engineer? The video mentioned an international level. He summed up the video with saying that he would still limit his exposure by increasing his proximity to EMF emitting devices. Maybe that doctor you speak of would say to you "did you watch the whole video?". That said, do you still use wireless?
Yeah, to hell with proven scientific tests from experienced people in their fields, eh?
What qualifications and evidence do you have to label this man as 'bumbling'?
oh i know that guy. i trust the professor at 13:38.
great video with specific testing and not just hype.
I test I would have loved to see would be multiple devices together. If you have your phone and wearing a watch (wearable) and working on a tablet(laptop) close to an Access Point that broadcasts in both 2.4 and 5ghz frequencies; Would the total Wattage be above the 10W per Meter squared? Nowadays with people working from home would fall under this scenario. Also what about when the device is plugged into power?
Thank you for what you are creating and putting out. I am a new subscriber.
Plugging something in does not increase the RF output.
I use Bluetooth headphones 🎧 now I'm not sure
@@lauracknoll, they're super safe. They're only transmitting 30ft. That's super low power.
cell phone radiate power of around 500 mW = 1/2 watt. Amateur Radio are allow to put out 1500 watts 3000 times more than typical cell phone. they operate mostly in residential neighbourhood. if you see large antenna in your neighbourhood, most likely they are amateur radio ( Ham ) operator. you should ask what power level they are putting out, and if they are keeping legal safety limits.
A+
Its funny that Knowing that our phones emit radiation, we still keep it close to our nuts.
Well, not really. You aim radiation at your nuts all the time. Ever heard of "light"? Yes, "Light" is the same kind of "radiation" as RF. RF is simply lower power than light.
@@topherkrock we even use that so called low power light in the microwave ovens too
@@tarzanautowala6506, I mean, what about "500 to 1500 watts" do you consider "low powered"?
Microwave ovens use a magnetron and 2000 volt capacitor to create the level of power needed to heat food, which is all that is does.
Your asinine comment was like comparing a laser used to cut steel with a lightbulb. Yeah, we know that light can be used to heat/cut things, but can a lightbulb do that? No.
*Who would be dumb enough to fear lightbulbs because of powerful lasers?*
Cell phone frequencies were used on diplomatic buildings in Russia for decades. And yes low level raideation is harmful
I wouldn't trust their guidelines. Take as much precautions as possible 🛡
we supposed to be 6 feet social distancing from my phone now
😂
He said people, to be extra safe, listen to what they are saying, in-between the words
Would like to see a test on shungite if possible.. :)
I am sorry to say that we have been given misinformation and told out-right lies so often by so called experts and authorities; that it is still difficult to be trusting of any information we are given. I do thank you and appreciate what you are trying to do on this site to protect the public; and we are interested in seeking out your information, never the less. I want to be hopeful for the sake of all of us.
Iphones frequency rage is below 1 GHz .. Measurements from a EMC chamber, with High-Performance Pyramidal Foam EMC Absorber, will not be able to give accurate radiation results... Hmmm..Guess it's SOP.. close 🙈 and let the 🐂💩 propagate ?.. .🤳
You need to learn about things like the "scientific method" and its application. This will help you understand why we can trust the body of knowledge that humanity has built up through the years.
Yes, I agree that many very dedicated people are using the scientific method to great advantage, helping humanity through the years. Even then often in time, we find that our knowledge and interpretations are incomplete or not accurate as we gain further knowledge and people do suffer as a result, IMO.
However there many professional, corporate beings and "so called" experts, who do not have the well-being of most of humanity in mind when they act, or perhaps they just true innocent believers in the information they were given, or they accept that that is how things are in these times, and working in their field, requires some some finessing from 'on high'. They need to earn a living and or make a name for themselves to do well in their field in order to compete, so do as they must.
These "on high" entities having this form of top dog, eugenic "SURVIVAL of the FITTEST" ideation, --who need and hire these scientific experts to prove their products or the value of whatever they have to offer, get to pick and choose the most promising appearing results, then further tweek the findings to suit their ends and purposes; as they gain power, control, material resources, realestate, or pure and simple monetary gain.
We must realize that there are many expendable individuals and groups being sacrificed to low standards, misinformation or downright lies which dombarding the public with their hand-selected expert advice and information. As with many groups 'supposedly' working for the public good, their business is to know, understand and manipulate the people to their ends and purposes. People who may or may not have a clue what the "SCIENTIFIC METHOD" is or how it can be manipulated to misrepresent or mis-inform humanity.@@topherkrock PLease tell me it ain't so. I want to believe again, shuck off my life experience, embrace truth and know whom to trust and when and which such --often contradictory truth is required in real life for actual well-being and goodness. That's is my problem, I AIN'T smart enough to be able to tell what the truth is or how accurately the "Scientific Method" has been applied to anything. I believe the public has often been misled and has become collateral damage in many fields areas of life. That concerns me! I hold to my original comment.
@@resolutionarybeing1885, your problem is that you like to lie. Why don't you STFU and learn to listen? Maybe clean the sh!t out of your eyes and ears from time to time. Stop trying to conflate things.
*The SCIENTIFIC METHOD **_cannot_** be used to deceive anyone.* Anyone who understands what it is will know that it is a set of rules that governs how to do scientific research properly. It creates the framework.
Can you explain how that could be used for deceptive purposes?
Intrresting its out of singapore. A number one profucer of the phones etc
3:15 Should be electromagnetic frequency not radio frequency which is the non-ionizing portion.
Very well done! this is actually a well-balanced investigation of RF EMF radiation exposure in humans. I would like to see a second part looking at the biological effects of exposure in the current safety guidelines range i.e. 10w/m2 to see if these should be updated.
"10w/m2 to see if these should be updated"
Are you kidding me if they should be updated.
Nothing needs to be updated.
Im really curious how wireless earphone radiation is because they are in your ear not like a mobile next to you ear....
My husband died this year from glioblastoma brain tumor, (the terminator). He was never much of an AirPod, IPhone, IPad, or other device User. He was more old school and rarely used these devices, however, I do wonder why so many RARE primary brain tumors are being diagnosed in Heber/Overgaard/and other areas in AZ, as the per patient ratio to capita of population is way way off; (8 tumors in 100K population is the STAT), problem is, H/O as above, only has a population of 25K, so what gives? Could it be the 94 million gallons of Uranium, radioactive metal tailings, and sulfates, that breached a dam in Church Rock NM., spilling over into the lil Colorado river and Rio Puerco River on into Holbrook, AZ in 1979; of which we lived right below (1 hr drive there from Linden AZ), of which I am aware - this population of 25K, has had at least 8 peeps with tumors in the past few years. So where did that 94 million bottles of WHAT GO? And what damage has it done to the water table, soil, air, trees, plants, grass, etc… Is it perhaps in the wood that we burn in a wood stove for winter warmth? My husband use to sit right close to that thing, whereas I was usually blown outta the room by the amount of heat it gives off. They told us he had 12-15 months, some shorter, some longer, when in actuality, most live 8.6 months after dx., so we did lose him 9/27/23, after dx. 2/2/23, but he had been suffering a couple of months with speech aphasia prior to dx. ME, I use all of those apple devices all the time, probably have my AirPods in all day long most days, and most nights to get to sleep.
The truly radioactive things and other poisons in the environment are definitely the issue, not the harmless, longer EMF wavelengths. So sorry for your loss.
I'm so thankful for the captions when the indian guy is talking. 😁
Governmental safety guidelines for EMF were only created based on thermal effects on human tissue. No consideration was given to biological effects such as calcium channel activation, cytokine production, etc.
Actually, these have been studied and there is no effect on VGCCs, VGSCs, or cytokine production. Sleep safe!
You should be getting more likes than those K-Pop music videos.
It mean use wire headphones much safer than Bluetooth? Distance is main key
why not run the Geiger counter over those anti-stickers then you find yourself in the other end of the electromagnetic spectrum
Thank you kindly for providing an independent, 3rd party test of the shielding performance of our SYB Baby Beanie. We are proud to be the only product you tested that actually worked. It is a shame that so many fake EMF protection products are on the market.
Just use the sticker properly
@@joelsedigo344 It's not a sticker.
Metal on baby's head. No thanks
@@tlqweasdzxc001 Wait what's wrong with that?
It went from -25 to -31 but they didn't really explain how significant that was but they at least gave a tick...
What about Bluetooth connectivity?
+10 rad/sec
Bluetooth uses much less power. It is quite safe.
The question really is how safe are the safety guidelines?
Extremely safe.
Everyone's head is going to blow up
Can you do a documentary on vape vs cigarettes?
What about crowds? I bet it adds up
A lot of anti radiation devices have actual ionizing (cell damaging) radiation material in them, and emit gamma rays, which are FAR worse than your phone’s harmless RF radiation, which is weaker than visible light.
it is weaker than visible light in a sense of frequency. those radiation in our powerlines, according to the electromagnetic spectrum is amongst the lowest in frequency. but still very dangerous
@@pencodes3580 everyone says it's dangerous whyyy is it
@@pencodes3580, actually, the frequency in power lines is neither the lowest, nor is it harmful. 50/60Hz does nothing to you. The voltage and amperage of the electricity can harm you, but that is completely independent of the frequency.
Flats are prone to higher RF radiation. Your neighbour above/below/beside you could be contributing. More so if they have a Smart-home.
That is true. Overlapping wireless signals.
@@SuccessforLifester, except that it's not really true. Keep in mind that there is plenty of distance and materials between apartments.
Need a summary of this video please
It is all safe. Also, Devra Davis contradicts herself in one sentence.
19:40 The year is 2022, now we sell tin foil hat for baby lmao
That head cap is safer for children head when we can find in thailand can buy witch say made in Singapore? Anyone help how much cost?
Usually the anti radiation clothes are made from silver fabric. That blocks it.
thanks CNA for calming down the boomers for us with a very informative video
It dont coz anything that doesn't agree with em is clandestine propaganda😅
So the so-called crazy people who wear aluminum foil hats aren't crazy at all they was actually right all this time.
What sucks is turning off your router to reduce wifi radiation, yet you can still pick up neighbours wifi in your home and they are 6 houses away
It's worse than smoking, cause now you are almost nowhere safe,
in the past you could just avoid smoke by not being somewhere, but that is much harder with RF,
it's like they are now smoking in your house.
Hahaha In last 10-20 years they- corrupt laying WHO- lifted healh denger points RADIATION LIMIT from 100 befoure to NOW 100 000... So healh standards are now Bullcrap for ZOMBIS , Use your brain !!! Check this info your self on internet.
@@Merializer, actually, it is quite safe. I don't know why you watch these videos if you aren't going to learn anything.
@CrazyFunCats, your neighbors' Wi-Fi is at such low levels that it is doing exactly nothing to you.
@@topherkrock wrong.
Long term wifi exposure does affect people. Especially when other wifi’s are even stronger than from our house. Also...look up Bluetooth...it’s also not good, especially when people wear cordless headphones. Read the warnings too from Apple.
Radiation detector?? Hmmm, not like the app on the phone?
Well, I do feel much better being in a remote area, away from wifi and electronics.
Nothing is sweet as trees rustling as well as a 5G tower.
im curious to know what cellphones were tested??
You can look up the official SAR ratings for any phone. That said, the safest phones are some flip phones that don't call home very often. All the smart phones I've measured transmit all the time regularly when you're not using them. The flip phone I have only transmits on powering up or down, receiving or sending a text, or making or receiving a call. It does randomly transmit infrequently rather than frequently like a smart phone. But apparently some newer flip phones transmit more often than others. Personally, mine stays charged up but powered off to only use it in emergencies or to receive a text code.
Watch the video.
What about wirless (bluetooth) airpods , are they safe?
Very safe. They are at extremely low power.