Not clear why both line judges should be asked for a judgement - at 0:05 the base line judge (on referee's side of court) indicates out - in other words the attack shot was too long in his opinion - in which case it does not rally matter where the ball landed if the attack zone has been violated. The first fault should always be penalised. The 3 metre line fault protest should have been addressed first - if upheld there is no need to consider the resulting ball in/out challenge. As the ball appears to land clearly within the side line, the other line judge (diagonally opposite) does not really need to be consulted unless he also indicates out. If both are consulted and have differing opinions - that will cause an issue. Otherwise the back court attack here was legal - and the ball appears to have landed inside the court area.
Basically its legal because her foot didnt touch the 3-meter line. You can hop over it if you want itll still be legal...just as long as your last known step wasnt touching the line
That hit was legal and in bounds
I agree with you!!
Second referee should not be watching the attacking team, just the net action?
Second referee can now help with these things at the college level
Not clear why both line judges should be asked for a judgement - at 0:05 the base line judge (on referee's side of court) indicates out - in other words the attack shot was too long in his opinion - in which case it does not rally matter where the ball landed if the attack zone has been violated.
The first fault should always be penalised. The 3 metre line fault protest should have been addressed first - if upheld there is no need to consider the resulting ball in/out challenge.
As the ball appears to land clearly within the side line, the other line judge (diagonally opposite) does not really need to be consulted unless he also indicates out.
If both are consulted and have differing opinions - that will cause an issue.
Otherwise the back court attack here was legal - and the ball appears to have landed inside the court area.
Basically its legal because her foot didnt touch the 3-meter line. You can hop over it if you want itll still be legal...just as long as your last known step wasnt touching the line
Everything is perfect and the ball landed inside the court... what is the problem here ?