In my school, there are some national level volleyball players and they told me that the backcourt player should not jump in the front zone and attack... I used to hold the point as you do but now I judge the fault as they suggested in practice.
You are allowed as a backcourt player to jump and attack the ball in the front zone, as long as the ball is not entirely above the height of the net at the moment of contact. If the ball is entirely higher than the top of the net a backcourt attack-hit-fault should be whistled!
From my experience, as judging the correct hight of the ball is difficult, the rule is implemented as no fault as long as you do not jump (which is roughly correct for most players)
That is the big job of a good referee... I do not like the rule that the first referee doesn't move at all.... he's 50m higher than the net to watch everything and he doesn't move at all his head and body (only his hands at the end)... impossible to see the perfect milimeter higher or under the net when the touch is done. Trust me it's hard sometimes...
what if during this rotation i am at the front but then i move to back court during the rally do i still have to hit behind the 3m line? or can i just go abit ahead because in this rotation i was a the front
I think it's according to your original rotational position which nobody specifies. So for example: if you are "Front right" position in the rotation as you should be before the ball is served and you moved back of the line to go and spoke passed the line you would be good. Reason: it's a foul only if your rotation position is at any of the back three positions before the ball is served
You played half of the video and started explaining foul, I was thinking everything was going correct, where did he see foul ?? And after all the rules, you showed half of the remaining video and explained that how he did foul. You should have played the whole video first and after the you should have explained about foul
But, 13.2.2 A back-row player may complete an attack hit at any height from behind the front zone: 13.2.2.1 at his/her take-off, the player's foot (feet) must neither have touched not crossed over the attack line;
Back row attaker. Didn't hit the ball he try to set high ball to the second touch.. It's an fault? But he touch the attack line and set to the high ball.
There are a few other caveats. The official should not call an illegal back row hit until the ball is touched/blocked by the other team or it lands in bounds for an apparent point. A ball spiked out of bounds or into the net on a 3rd hit should not be whistled. Also a ball spiked into the net with remaining hits and subsequently played by same team is also NOT illegal.
An illegal back row attack constitutes an infringement immediately the ball completely crosses the plane of the net to the opponents side - regardless if it lands in or out of court, or any contact by the receiving team when on their own side of the net. If the ball is blocked, so that it does not completely cross the plane of the net, then no illegal back court attack has occurred. The referee would be in error if he/she prematurely whistled this as an infringement.
@@maconescotland8996 If the ball is blocked, it's still back row attack fault. FIVB Rule 13.1.3 "An attack hit is completed at the moment the ball completely crosses the vertical plane of the net or is touched by an opponent"
@@lechjonczyk5095 I don't think that means it's a fault when blocked - it just means the attack hit is completed - that is not the same as saying it's an infringement.
@@maconescotland8996 13.3 Faults of the attack hit 13.3.3 A back-row player completes an attack hit from the front zone, if at the moment of the hit the ball is entirely higher than the top of the net.
@@lechjonczyk5095 It's many years since I was a qualified official - but "completing an attack hit" is not a fault in itself. The back row player can legally direct the ball towards the opponents court as long as they satisfy the appropriate rules. Contact with an opponents block over the net, rendering it a fault, must have been a rule change since my days. I remember when the defending team could only make a blocking contact on their own side of the next, and a touch on the block counted towards the total of 3 allowable touches to return the ball.
What I understood was that you can't initiate an attack from behind the 3m. and have the point of contact being beyond the 3m. line. I guess I was wrong. So, no matter what, the rule is "Don't touch the line, have the ball above the net and don't be a back court player", right? So only three players of each team can be violating this rule, is this correct? The front players can step on the line as nothing happened, yes? Thanks!
Yes, those are the key factors, but you can still commit a very good attack out of the back-row without touching the 3 meter line. The fact, if the ball is over the net, is not taken into account until the back-row player has touched the 3 meter line, and thereby creates a possibility for it to be an illegal attack hit fault (if the ball is over the net and the player has set off touching the 3 meter line, and the ball completely crosses the plane of the net, there is an attack hit fault, and it should be whistled.)
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
In my school, there are some national level volleyball players and they told me that the backcourt player should not jump in the front zone and attack... I used to hold the point as you do but now I judge the fault as they suggested in practice.
You are allowed as a backcourt player to jump and attack the ball in the front zone, as long as the ball is not entirely above the height of the net at the moment of contact. If the ball is entirely higher than the top of the net a backcourt attack-hit-fault should be whistled!
From my experience, as judging the correct hight of the ball is difficult, the rule is implemented as no fault as long as you do not jump (which is roughly correct for most players)
Wtf I don't understand anything
@@volleyballreferee6106 best to avoid such rules. It can be always a source of confusion and despair for the players and the referee
That is the big job of a good referee... I do not like the rule that the first referee doesn't move at all.... he's 50m higher than the net to watch everything and he doesn't move at all his head and body (only his hands at the end)... impossible to see the perfect milimeter higher or under the net when the touch is done. Trust me it's hard sometimes...
are there more examples of illegal backrow attacks
you also need to make sure the ball crosses the plane of the net completely and or touch the other team's blocker
the musi cisw annoying
what if during this rotation i am at the front but then i move to back court during the rally do i still have to hit behind the 3m line? or can i just go abit ahead because in this rotation i was a the front
No. You are a front player and can attack from everywhere on the field. This only concerns the 3 players in back court
I think it's according to your original rotational position which nobody specifies. So for example: if you are "Front right" position in the rotation as you should be before the ball is served and you moved back of the line to go and spoke passed the line you would be good.
Reason: it's a foul only if your rotation position is at any of the back three positions before the ball is served
Need to point out also if hit is legal and coach is yelling fault to wave signal so coach knows referee saw the legal hit.
You played half of the video and started explaining foul, I was thinking everything was going correct, where did he see foul ?? And after all the rules, you showed half of the remaining video and explained that how he did foul. You should have played the whole video first and after the you should have explained about foul
I don't get the last part. Being a backrow and jumping without touching the 3m line and fingering over the net, is it a fault?
No, its the same intention when atacking the ball
Thank q .And I want some information i.e about body touch in volleyball
What do you mean by body touch?
If we touch pole it is fault or not please reply
Please make a video on volleyball rotation 5-1
ruclips.net/video/OB4TD7w-kQo/видео.html
so when the ball is over the height of the net when in contact with hand, its gonna be fault??
only if the backrow atacker jumps inside the three meter mark
how to count points and right ought i am confuse
I love volleyball
WOW THIS IS A STRONG MESSAGE 🍇 GRAPE 🍇
@@joselitoguerra9736 thanks
what if it the backrow player is in front of the attack line but passes or volleys the ball and it goes over the net, is it still an illegal attack?
Top Hat 21 only if the ball is above the net
They play this music in Guantanamo to torture prisoners
Can the player of the back court jump and attack in the front court when the ball is below the net? Or he can not jump, but only to attack?
The back-row player can jump in the front-zone, and attack the ball, IF the ball is below the net at the point of contact.
But,
13.2.2 A back-row player may complete an attack hit at any height from
behind the front zone:
13.2.2.1 at his/her take-off, the player's foot (feet) must neither have touched
not crossed over the attack line;
Yes that is correct and what I was trying to convey in my other comment.
Midline rule please
Back row attaker. Didn't hit the ball he try to set high ball to the second touch.. It's an fault? But he touch the attack line and set to the high ball.
No, its not a fault since he didnt attack
There are a few other caveats. The official should not call an illegal back row hit until the ball is touched/blocked by the other team or it lands in bounds for an apparent point. A ball spiked out of bounds or into the net on a 3rd hit should not be whistled. Also a ball spiked into the net with remaining hits and subsequently played by same team is also NOT illegal.
An illegal back row attack constitutes an infringement immediately the ball completely crosses the plane of the net to the opponents side - regardless if it lands in or out of court, or any contact by the receiving team when on their own side of the net.
If the ball is blocked, so that it does not completely cross the plane of the net, then no illegal back court attack has occurred. The referee would be in error if he/she prematurely whistled this as an infringement.
@@maconescotland8996 If the ball is blocked, it's still back row attack fault. FIVB Rule 13.1.3 "An attack hit is completed at the moment the ball completely crosses
the vertical plane of the net or is touched by an opponent"
@@lechjonczyk5095 I don't think that means it's a fault when blocked - it just means the attack hit is completed - that is not the same as saying it's an infringement.
@@maconescotland8996 13.3 Faults of the attack hit 13.3.3 A back-row player completes an attack hit from the front zone, if at the
moment of the hit the ball is entirely higher than the top of the net.
@@lechjonczyk5095 It's many years since I was a qualified official - but "completing an attack hit" is not a fault in itself.
The back row player can legally direct the ball towards the opponents court as long as they satisfy the appropriate rules. Contact with an opponents block over the net, rendering it a fault, must have been a rule change since my days.
I remember when the defending team could only make a blocking contact on their own side of the next, and a touch on the block counted towards the total of 3 allowable touches to return the ball.
ball can be never below net
what is the sign for the referee?
This signal can be found here: www.fivb.org/EN/Refereeing-Rules/Documents/FIVB_Volleyball_Hand_Signal_Poster_2015-2016.pdf
It is signal 21
oh hello there we are in 2018
please do back in time when that rules applied.
Wait a minute... The first player IS backcourt, the ball IS higher than the net and the point of touch IS inside the 3m box. How is this NOT a fault?
Do you mean the first clip in the video? Where it states "is he about to commit a backcourt attack hit fault"?
He sets off before the 3 meter line!
What I understood was that you can't initiate an attack from behind the 3m. and have the point of contact being beyond the 3m. line. I guess I was wrong.
So, no matter what, the rule is "Don't touch the line, have the ball above the net and don't be a back court player", right? So only three players of each team can be violating this rule, is this correct? The front players can step on the line as nothing happened, yes?
Thanks!
Yes, those are the key factors, but you can still commit a very good attack out of the back-row without touching the 3 meter line. The fact, if the ball is over the net, is not taken into account until the back-row player has touched the 3 meter line, and thereby creates a possibility for it to be an illegal attack hit fault (if the ball is over the net and the player has set off touching the 3 meter line, and the ball completely crosses the plane of the net, there is an attack hit fault, and it should be whistled.)
And yes only three players can be violated at a time.
In Hindi please
And everyone knows about fault in game so it's kind of lame idea, explaining about fault
Ok boomer