Mod-02 Lec-04 The Free Particle

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 дек 2024

Комментарии • 32

  • @pradeepsharma_1962
    @pradeepsharma_1962 12 лет назад +15

    I would like to add that through Ghatak sir's lectures,Prof Shankar's lectures, Prof Lewin's lectures and Prof Balakrishnan's lectures I have learnt how to teach physics to university students in a far better way than usual approach.

  • @pradeepsharma_1962
    @pradeepsharma_1962 12 лет назад +19

    Even the weakest student will be able to understand quantum mechanics from these lectures.A grand thankyou to you Ghatak Sir.I wish I had more teachers like you during my university days,yes we also had some good teachers but Ghatak Sir's approach is very special as he does everything in lot of detail.

    • @tashi2009
      @tashi2009 3 года назад

      @@jacobvandijk6525 are you nut. .?

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 3 года назад +1

      @@tashi2009 To some degree everyone is.

  • @jdtaramona1
    @jdtaramona1 11 лет назад +6

    I am absolutely agree with Pradeep Sharma. Dr. Ghatak's Lecture is really fantastic and understandable for such a man like me who has an engineering background, but is pursuing a Master degree in Physics and dream to get a Phd degree in Physics in some American University. Thank you Dr. Ghatak and go on with your lectures. Greetings from Peru.

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 Год назад

    Patience knowledge explanatory skill dedication to physics embodiment of physics this is the speciality of this professor.

  • @Benzene6.023
    @Benzene6.023 6 лет назад +3

    Really great lecture by sir and after discussing evolution of wave packet with time then animation is quite good.
    Best lectures on QM.
    Everyone QM lover join this lecture series.

  • @raghvendrashukla4178
    @raghvendrashukla4178 7 месяцев назад +1

    I am surprised love you sir ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @givemeArupee
    @givemeArupee Месяц назад

    What is meant by finding the momentum? Isn’t momenta a calculated thing?

  • @manoranjansahu7161
    @manoranjansahu7161 Год назад

    This is beautiful

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 2 года назад

    Unparallel lectures blessed by Iyyanarappan Tamil country God.

  • @priyanshubansal6776
    @priyanshubansal6776 3 года назад +2

    lecture is great but he didn't explain in detail ...like what does this wave function even mean? how this represent a particle ? what we mean by localized here ?

  • @Frostbitecgi
    @Frostbitecgi 5 лет назад +1

    please make a video over the spread of gaussian wave packet .... because i could not able to evaluate the integral for psi (x,t) on my on... its very hard. please make a video tutorial how to evaluate that integral and simplify

    • @zachzanal1067
      @zachzanal1067 4 года назад

      try to use completion of squares and start by naming constants right from the initial steps,so that the expression don't look dirty
      It is not hard,looks dirty
      But done with care,is easy:)

  • @ravindrasuthar
    @ravindrasuthar 3 года назад

    Wah
    Sir🥺🙇‍♂️

  • @SomitBharadwaj
    @SomitBharadwaj 3 года назад

    Thank you so much sir ☺️☺️☺️

  • @tashi2009
    @tashi2009 3 года назад

    Legend

  • @salu30000
    @salu30000 3 года назад

    he is not explaining his motive behind taking each functions very clearly

  • @ROHITKUMAR-hi4cu
    @ROHITKUMAR-hi4cu 3 года назад

    Einstein said if we are not able teach science to a 5th class Students it means nothing... And here every function is going on why not explained... integration not explained... Why we are doing so much calculation not explained....and if an IIT faculty not able to make understand the concept then I am in doubt who will

  • @swarnalihait7201
    @swarnalihait7201 10 лет назад +2

    Holy Crap!

    • @alokkumarchauhan3305
      @alokkumarchauhan3305 4 года назад

      Crap!! Why??

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 4 года назад +1

      @@alokkumarchauhan3305 "Holy Crap" is not necessarily a negative expression.

    • @farooq8897
      @farooq8897 2 года назад

      @@jacobvandijk6525 Where did he claim that? He said that if we knew the initial wavw function, we can solve.

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 2 года назад

      @@farooq8897 There are no initial conditions for a free particle.

    • @farooq8897
      @farooq8897 2 года назад

      @@jacobvandijk6525 That's why the given solution is a general solution. A plane wave is a solution but not normalisable. He took the superposition of infinite plane waves as the most general solution. He then proceeded to give an example of one such solution which is a Gaussian wave packet. He didn't say it's the wavefunction derived from SE but just assumed a wavefunction as example. All QM textbooks do that. Am I missing something?