Mod-01 Lec-02 Basic Quantum Mechanics II: The Schrodinger Equation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 дек 2024

Комментарии • 95

  • @souvikbhatta2224
    @souvikbhatta2224 8 лет назад +26

    im a below avg student
    and this was suprisingly easy to understand for me
    thank you professor
    pronam neben

  • @pavelsaha2730
    @pavelsaha2730 5 лет назад +5

    For this man I passed in my physics exam. Thanks a lot sir. Without this man I'd fail

  • @sishir_jana
    @sishir_jana 6 лет назад +10

    Sir ,I read the optics book written by you is very good book to understand physics properly.Thanking you sir

    • @norasellaoui1822
      @norasellaoui1822 Год назад

      Please the title of book and name of author in English of course?

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 3 года назад

    To your Industrious effort we understand well I fall at your feet.

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 Год назад

    God of physics to India is prof.Ajoy Ghatak.

  • @ScalarSeeker
    @ScalarSeeker Месяц назад

    An excellent lecture on Dirac Delta function in my opinion

  • @kewalanand6197
    @kewalanand6197 8 лет назад +1

    thank u sir....u r a former professor of IIT Delhi.......I m a student of the same institution........I well understood.. the Dirac delta function..

  • @rgbulusu
    @rgbulusu 11 лет назад +1

    excellent methodology of teaching. Really outstanding. So lucid.

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 3 года назад

    None can teach better than this quantum mechanics. ஆ ஆ ஆ ஆ.

  • @mcchickencrispy
    @mcchickencrispy 9 лет назад +5

    Thank you very much for this video sir :-) ..means a lot to a students who struggle with this topic ..Thanks once again ..!!

  • @hudamh7479
    @hudamh7479 4 года назад

    Best lecturer in lecturing quantum mechanics

  • @powerentertainment719
    @powerentertainment719 2 года назад

    Very good professor. HE explained everything well.

  • @masoomladka8017
    @masoomladka8017 3 года назад +1

    14:50 can anyone send rigorous derivation of shrodinger eqn

    • @aryanshah17
      @aryanshah17 2 года назад

      Long time no see bruh lol

    • @masoomladka8017
      @masoomladka8017 Год назад

      @@aryanshah17 tum telegram id delete kardiye how can i contact u?

    • @masoomladka8017
      @masoomladka8017 Год назад

      @@aryanshah17 tele pe aana to msg karna warna koi dusra social media account do

    • @kiit8337
      @kiit8337 Год назад

      @@masoomladka8017 aree masoom bhai 🥺🙂🙂🙂

  • @Chandrasanjeevakharvi
    @Chandrasanjeevakharvi 6 лет назад +1

    I proudly feel, i understood some thing... Thats why we need a master ..

  • @pradyumnakatageri3475
    @pradyumnakatageri3475 3 года назад

    Nearly a century later, Schrodinger's cat is how most of us remember Schrodinger's work. His work must be much more praised !!

  • @SimeonHanks
    @SimeonHanks 11 лет назад +4

    To anyone watching these videos, it would be of great importance for you to know of a new feature within RUclips. You can volunteer on the bottom of the screen to "Try something new" and enable HTML5 viewing. This allows you to play these lectures at 1.5x or 2.0x speed, effectively doubling your studying time efficiency.

    • @UditDey
      @UditDey 8 лет назад +2

      you are so outdated

    • @jdragon8184
      @jdragon8184 4 года назад

      lol noob x1.75 is much better

    • @jdragon8184
      @jdragon8184 4 года назад +2

      though 6 year ago this cmnt was imp

  • @utkarshpande11
    @utkarshpande11 9 лет назад +2

    thanks sir for the video..nice brush-up of the concepts.

  • @hasanakin8078
    @hasanakin8078 9 лет назад +3

    Thanks Professor for this nice video

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    I love the name it's attractive to speak dirak n dinğer equation

  • @akashadsul7363
    @akashadsul7363 9 лет назад +1

    nice lecture sir really helful..btw i love ur optics book

  • @georgeanton302
    @georgeanton302 5 лет назад

    Hey what exactly happened at 22:17, I've seen this happen to people before... is that like a ministroke?

  • @alexandersani7203
    @alexandersani7203 12 лет назад +1

    These proff is too good

  • @joychakraborty3281
    @joychakraborty3281 4 года назад

    55:47 why the dirac delta function added to the equation

  • @Quantum_study
    @Quantum_study 7 лет назад +2

    Your books on optics is great

  • @sherinshajiphysics
    @sherinshajiphysics 6 лет назад +1

    So simply ...😍😍😍

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 3 года назад

    Excellent.How do you remember all these things in mind?we can not appreciate you but we can prostrate before you sir.

  • @rakeshmeher7255
    @rakeshmeher7255 6 лет назад

    24:15 , how volume element dx dy equal to that.. can one explain plz ??

  • @gerrynightingale9045
    @gerrynightingale9045 10 лет назад

    "All of energy and matter that existed still exists. The actions of matter enable energy to
    become manifest".

  • @Benzene6.023
    @Benzene6.023 6 лет назад +1

    Great lecture....

  • @rana000
    @rana000 5 лет назад +1

    sir,I have a question..for proving Schrodinger you take a wave function psi=Ae^i(kx-wt).how it is related to the particle...

  • @chakrapanigautam2547
    @chakrapanigautam2547 7 лет назад

    What does the imaginary part of a plane wave represent? Why we use this particular form of wave for the derivation of Schrodinger wave equation.?

  • @ozzyfromspace
    @ozzyfromspace 4 года назад +1

    To be honest, Hand wavy arguments confuse me... A rigorous mathematical treatment from first principles would have worked far better in this instance. Anyway, some people seem to like this style of teaching, so whatcha gon do? Wish you all the best, I’m finna head out now 👋🏽

  • @t.vigneshnayak7886
    @t.vigneshnayak7886 9 лет назад +1

    Crystal clear..

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    so wave function psi is a complex or we can also write in terms of sin n Cose form ?

  • @raminnikzad6317
    @raminnikzad6317 11 лет назад

    many thanks for putting this video
    @ 35:50 you could say easily that f(x) in that tiny range is f(a) and the rest is, according to definition of R, equal to 1 ..So the whole is f(a)

  • @formodapk
    @formodapk 6 месяцев назад

    if electron or proton is neither a particle nor wave then what is it??

  • @Abhi.Sharma
    @Abhi.Sharma 4 года назад

    could anyone please tell me the name of the book he is using?

  • @Sonitsharma44
    @Sonitsharma44 5 лет назад

    Must appreciated work sir thank you

  • @sureshapte7674
    @sureshapte7674 10 лет назад +1

    thanks for wonderfull exposition

  • @minhokim8263
    @minhokim8263 8 лет назад +2

    Sir, I have a questions on pronouncing Greek alphabet, why do many physicist pronounce Ψ [sai] instead of [psi]? I believe it is very wrong as the alphabet isn't English but Greek so well educated scientists should respect other cultures.

    • @SoumilSahu
      @SoumilSahu 6 лет назад +1

      I don't understand how mispronunciation denotes disrespect. People can never pronounce Ramanujan's name right, but as an Indian, I'm never offended.

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    41 dirak system graph as a linear system na ?

  • @anuragchitra7526
    @anuragchitra7526 5 лет назад

    thank you sir for explaining in such a nice way

  • @shubhamtiwari1415
    @shubhamtiwari1415 10 лет назад +1

    thanks for the Dirac delta function

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    delta del dirak all deals in a mixro system na ? why is it not possible see when we talk about galaxies than our planet is a mixro system na than will the behavior changed from that reference of dirax fun?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    18 you sir diffentied it twice it given you Ke so how do we know what it will give if further diffentied also let me know how do you know it's a kinetic energy sir ....?

  • @sherinshajiphysics
    @sherinshajiphysics 6 лет назад +1

    Thank you so much sir...

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    24 what we are doing for?

  • @vinayrana610
    @vinayrana610 6 лет назад +1

    thanks professor

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    discontinuity in a function is Dirac delta function

  • @muhammadbilaljaved2238
    @muhammadbilaljaved2238 3 года назад

    Can you Please share the notes of these Quantum Lectures

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    57 we do have a lot of nursery drawing in physics 😊?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    14 total energy is kinetic still I wanna know why we do so as due to so small mass or sir there you ignore gravity ......okay sir still is this dirak equation is not only valid micro but also in macro na than sir let me know that why we see that dinger equation do forget about the potential energy in 1D ?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    54 taller sharper n coherent ?

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 4 года назад

    Why has the wave function this kind of form (5:38)? Here is the answer:
    ruclips.net/video/T6TQHNXy5Wg/видео.html

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 3 года назад

      @Mathematical sciences I have to, because I'm too dumb to understand them ;-)

  • @prathameshlaware3503
    @prathameshlaware3503 3 года назад

    I didn't understand where the psi first came from and how the first equation psi=Ae^i(Kx-wt) was taken at the first place

    • @ScalarSeeker
      @ScalarSeeker Месяц назад +1

      Schrodinger equation is a wave equation and in order to prove that, we used a plane wave solution ψ=Aexp(i[kx-wt])
      Thats why its not consider a derivation because we used a plane wave to show that it satisfy a wave equation.

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    29 awesome I feel good in phase now but still there is fantasy calculations n I like only to do simple way let's find so

  • @MisterRorschach90
    @MisterRorschach90 9 лет назад

    I was shocked to learn you don't even need derivation skills above calc 2 to derive that equation.

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    respect to the system of discontinuity than Dirac delta function here we got so functional system as of Dirac + gaussian + graph of gaussian function so gaussian function is used in reference to wave nature n behaviour deriving cool

  • @PKP2021
    @PKP2021 6 лет назад +1

    Thanks sir j

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    8 1d plane wave awesome still I can't understand why he used so fancy symbols about de brouglie! yaa why ?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    34 you can even make a nursery boy accept the concept sir that was a mountain n a building where function seems as a crows n vultures I like that

  • @krushnachandrashankhua637
    @krushnachandrashankhua637 4 года назад

    Thank u sir

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    31 what a function sir wonderful I liked that drawings it seems good to make Dirac graphics i like that system of drawing wanna get computer graphics for the same sir is it possible direct me .

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    we do need fourier system so some equation sir we need to make some okay do know that wave nor particle is but a hypothetical system it's a function what are you making me say that it's a function so just imagine the creator first doing some random maths and He found a function n put in some computing system lo you see what He got ...oh it's a subatomic particle : party now?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    38 diraķ sign is quite fantasy symbol consider a Birsa munda bhagwan doing same derivation what would be his sign sir awesomest

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    38 sigma is the ?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    I want better name to seems difficult see if wanna name mine self as kadifrandaneonineygenedia too difficult? TRY new material as zdoz dozdozd how is it sir say as abia shiffar /surfer?

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    thus here wave function psi graph on 47

  • @amaljeevk3950
    @amaljeevk3950 Год назад

  • @ridael-mehdawe4681
    @ridael-mehdawe4681 8 лет назад

    appreciated

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    20 it really lacks rigour I understand still can't digest

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 3 года назад

    Sorimuthu Ayyanar Tamil God name changed as schorindger.

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones 4 года назад

    DeBrogllie ==> pronounced "debroyy."

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    13 I'd there any bihari there who solved in his language?

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 2 года назад

    SorimuthuIyyanar Tamil country God name changed as schorindger.

  • @kioloventura6812
    @kioloventura6812 9 лет назад

    i came here from watching faze

  • @arrabalimaz622
    @arrabalimaz622 5 лет назад

    de brouglie me having so simple name as you see I am Ali

  • @kabandajamilu9036
    @kabandajamilu9036 3 года назад +1

    Thank you sir