The Russian Woodpecker of Chernobyl: How To See Over The Horizon

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
  • tomscott.com - / tomscott - Thanks to Ashley Shepherd for the drone footage - see the full video on his channel here: • 4K Drone Footage from ...
    This is the Duga-3 array, inside the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. It's an incredible piece of Soviet engineering, capable of sending radar pulses so powerful they could see over the horizon. Which, when you think about it, is more complicated than it might initially appear...

Комментарии • 625

  • @PierreBezemer
    @PierreBezemer 4 года назад +466

    I've been there myself, and I can't stress enough how enormous the sheer size of this build is. You have to see it for yourself

    • @lukesmith819
      @lukesmith819 2 года назад +16

      Damn I think Putin read this

    • @Chillerll
      @Chillerll 2 года назад +6

      I don't think I am going there anytime soon.

    • @googleuser6440
      @googleuser6440 Год назад +3

      I've seen bigger

  • @nikhilmenda2983
    @nikhilmenda2983 8 лет назад +1414

    I don't know why but I was expecting a mutated woodpecker endemic to chernobyl...

  • @JimPlaysGames
    @JimPlaysGames 9 лет назад +2255

    Considering the final sentence in this video makes me think we're in one of the few parallel universes where humanity did survive and most of the others are nuclear wastelands. A few others have sentient ducks.

    • @Joe0Alt
      @Joe0Alt 9 лет назад +90

      By a few do you mean an infinitely many universes with sentient ducks and an infinitely many universes with no sentient ducks.

    • @meghandenny6922
      @meghandenny6922 9 лет назад +56

      You watch kurzgesagt? Good man.

    • @lucasbune
      @lucasbune 9 лет назад +27

      Joe Alt but the infinitely many universes with sentient ducks are fewer than the infinitely many universes without sentient ducks

    • @Joe0Alt
      @Joe0Alt 9 лет назад +12

      LucAs Bune​ arithmetic with Infinitys doesn't work.

    • @Joe0Alt
      @Joe0Alt 9 лет назад +4

      ***** or are they more sentient, so much so we can't detect they level of sentient, like it being at level 9,001

  • @daganschoen4895
    @daganschoen4895 8 лет назад +538

    ooohhh I get it, radio active

    • @thomashughes_teh
      @thomashughes_teh 4 года назад +15

      This array needed massive power. It got it from Chernobyl, only a few hours away by foot through the woods. It is visible from the abandoned city of Pripyat.

    • @lukakresoja5297
      @lukakresoja5297 4 года назад +8

      @@thomashughes_teh So thats why there was a nuclear reactor thausands of km from anything that would need that much power

    • @stojankovacic1524
      @stojankovacic1524 4 года назад +11

      @@lukakresoja5297 Northern Ukraine is quite populous. In fact, all of Ukraine is populous. Ukraine has over 40 million people! Chernobyl was supposed to be the futuristic, ideal city for the young academic elite. That, and the Duga-3, needed that much power.

    • @theodoredalton3355
      @theodoredalton3355 4 года назад +12

      What if we kissed on the Duga-3 Array in Chernobyl!?!?!?! 😂🤣😂🤣😍😋😍🤣😂😎😎

    • @outcast4365
      @outcast4365 4 года назад +1

      Ba dum tss

  • @juicedmaster
    @juicedmaster 7 лет назад +706

    Wasn't all for nothing. If they built it, used it, and everyone knew they had it; everyone would have just thought 'there's no point firing at them coz they will instantly know' and probably therefore didn't bother. Prevention through discouragement.

    • @dragonemperor007
      @dragonemperor007 4 года назад +91

      The "cold" part of cold war.

    • @AnastasiaCooper
      @AnastasiaCooper 3 года назад +3

      especially considering that even if they wouldn't react in time to prevent the impact, they'd still shove the "dead hand" up the rest of the world's ass

    • @michealkaye860
      @michealkaye860 2 года назад +23

      A - very good point.
      B - excellent use of punctuation🙂

    • @Schattengewaechs99
      @Schattengewaechs99 2 года назад +7

      _Si vis pacem, para bellum_

    • @UCannotDefeatMyShmeat
      @UCannotDefeatMyShmeat 2 года назад +5

      That is until “mutually assured destruction” was seen as acceptable to some. Somehow

  • @joshhyyym
    @joshhyyym 9 лет назад +1006

    Sometimes my wifi drops out at the bottom of the garden. Would this help?

    • @mudkip9531
      @mudkip9531 7 лет назад +18

      You could use it but you'd need a lot more powerful of a transmitter as well as a solution to the incredible amount of noise.

    • @helloworld4390
      @helloworld4390 6 лет назад +7

      You probably could use something like this on a much smaller scale though

    • @linuspauly2380
      @linuspauly2380 6 лет назад +4

      Joshua Mcateer you probably would need a bit more bandwith

    • @dankshanks
      @dankshanks 5 лет назад +2

      r/whoosh

    • @colorado841
      @colorado841 5 лет назад +18

      Yes I think it would be about strong enough. Just out of curiosity what is your password, btw?

  • @iainstenhouse8399
    @iainstenhouse8399 7 лет назад +151

    This place is actually really interesting (Its designation is actually Duga 1), well Duga is more interesting (Located in the south of Ukraine) because it is semi-operational (yes somebody resored it), then there is the other one (Duga 2) (I forget where it is). Each installation had a transmiter and a reciver (usually 20-60 km away from each other) they had 3 so you could trangulate the missile and confrim that one wasnt malfuntioning. There were reports of a woodpeckeer signal as eraly as 1963 on a higher frequency.

  • @someperson3807
    @someperson3807 2 года назад +34

    Immediate recommended video after some obscure soundclip video of the DUGA

  • @photoo848
    @photoo848 2 года назад +211

    2:16 - Scott: Somehow, despite everything, humanity got through the Cold War
    Pippin: What about Second Cold War?

  • @davidstadille793
    @davidstadille793 2 года назад +38

    Tom, you wrote a great narrative for this and delivered it with just the right tone. I hope you're somewhere making documentary film or working as a broadcast journalist. We really enjoyed watching this, thank you.

    • @dannyynnad-u4p
      @dannyynnad-u4p Год назад +6

      Pfft he is making way more money, has way more creative freedom and recognition doing work on youtube than working in traditional broadcast.

    • @Martykun36
      @Martykun36 Год назад +2

      you should know that he's been publishing regularly to this day

  • @yoshibutkagekira7899
    @yoshibutkagekira7899 3 года назад +68

    "On your feet comrade, Are you ready for a little Retribution?"

  • @willparkinson
    @willparkinson 9 лет назад +372

    Incredible drone footage!

    • @RobertBlow
      @RobertBlow 9 лет назад +14

      Was thinking the same thing - wow.

    • @GewelReal
      @GewelReal 6 лет назад +1

      It's illegal tho

    • @ijustchangedmyname
      @ijustchangedmyname 4 года назад

      There are some videos of people climbing it on youtube.

    • @sinpi314
      @sinpi314 3 года назад

      @@GewelReal what

    • @HAZARDOUS88
      @HAZARDOUS88 3 года назад

      @@GewelReal You're illegal.

  • @glenjarnold
    @glenjarnold 7 лет назад +51

    I remember picking this up many times on my amateur radio equipment in the 80s!

  • @lumabi25
    @lumabi25 8 лет назад +49

    Back in the day I used to hear that annoying thing on shortwave radio, though I knew very little about it then. Only sometime this century did I learn what it looked like, where it was exactly and that it had an enormous output of 10 megawatts.

    • @trueriver1950
      @trueriver1950 3 года назад +13

      By 1980, when I was studying the ionosphere using a radar of much lower power but on the same frequencies, we heard it regularly.
      It was widely conjectured that the most likely explanation was that it was over the horizon radar.
      Other guesses at the time were Soviet mind control, and more extreme conspiracy ideas...

  • @dominicsurette2890
    @dominicsurette2890 2 года назад +17

    The last sentence of this video kinda be hittin different now...

  • @kitkatchunky93
    @kitkatchunky93 9 лет назад +46

    I wonder if this (or one similar) was the inspiration behind the 'fence' in the Divergent films.

    • @Kronospace
      @Kronospace 9 лет назад +17

      This radar array was used as inspiration for the film.
      news.moviefone.com/2014/03/13/divergent-production-designer-diary/

    • @ItsaHutchy
      @ItsaHutchy 6 лет назад +3

      The wall is basically identical just copied end to end

  • @rogerwilco2
    @rogerwilco2 9 лет назад +100

    I find the design very interesting. It looks like a large dipole array. Processing the signal from something like that is hard with computers from the seventies or even early eighties. Especially in near real-time.
    I would be very interested in how it exactly worked.

    • @Wtfinc
      @Wtfinc 2 года назад +8

      Same. Did you notice those transmission lines? They look like steam pipe! I want to see one of the elements up close and have explained to me why that particular design. I want to see the transmitter room! There is that one huge AM station up by canada where the antenna is just miles of cables strung up on poles. The amps for that one is cool! I love radio. I want to go get my advanced license. wish i could get a job with that. or is there somthing i dont know and thats exactly what i should do?

    • @rageagainstthebath
      @rageagainstthebath 2 года назад +4

      ​@@Wtfinc I'd assume it's still classified. At least I never stumbled upon any technical details.

    • @stickytapenrust6869
      @stickytapenrust6869 2 года назад +4

      @@Wtfinc Bear in mind this is NOT the transmitter. That was demolished. This is the receiver.

    • @magoshighlands4074
      @magoshighlands4074 2 года назад +4

      This was the third of three, the second one in Ukraine has been partially restored, it's really something to see

    • @the-quintessenz
      @the-quintessenz Год назад

      Processing was possibly entirely mechanical. Imagine a 300m deep basement with a gigantic pendulum attached to the signal array.

  • @ThekadaWr
    @ThekadaWr 9 лет назад +42

    Russian speaker here. It's pronounced Dugá. Accent on the a. Duga (Дуга) means "arc".

    • @stevewood8914
      @stevewood8914 9 лет назад +7

      ***** That doesn't look like IPA. Do you mean /duˈgɑː/?

    • @scottgoodson8295
      @scottgoodson8295 9 лет назад +7

      Steve Wood The Russian pronunciation is /dʊˈɡa/.

    • @smitias_8474
      @smitias_8474 8 лет назад +2

      +Evelyn it's not if you know even a bit of language. Using dUga instead of dugA in Russian sentence stand out way too much tonally

  • @willdrug
    @willdrug 5 лет назад +13

    *necroposting inbound* there was never a "Duga-3". There was "Duga", "Duga-1" and "Duga-2". This one is Duga-1 (the word means Arc is anyone is interested)

  • @JacanaProductions
    @JacanaProductions 8 лет назад +29

    Great piece! I actually recall hearing this over the horizon radar in the 80s way down their in Johannesburg, very annoying and quite spooky I recall. I have a suggestion too - look into "number stations" - very mysteriously but part of the cold war I believe and could be hear by us CB / Short wave enthusiasts in the 80s - good times!

  • @kostiemuirhead8187
    @kostiemuirhead8187 2 года назад +9

    That last line may not have aged as well as we hoped unfortunately.

  • @CeoLogJM
    @CeoLogJM 9 лет назад +37

    Pretty cool how much stuff was built near this little town.

    • @mishanya2077
      @mishanya2077 8 лет назад +6

      +‫ויאמר סבבה!‬‎ there was a lot of "small not important" towns in USSR that had strategic value

    • @devastator5042
      @devastator5042 8 лет назад +5

      +Миша Шевченко well yeah put factory x in Russian village x and the US won't think of bombing it so the warmachine can keep on living

    • @mishanya2077
      @mishanya2077 8 лет назад +1

      devastator5042 exactly

  • @ivanjsimer
    @ivanjsimer 9 лет назад +16

    This station is a true masterpiece of engineering.

  • @RMoribayashi
    @RMoribayashi 9 лет назад +17

    The woodpecker and other over the horizon radars (the US had several) weren't just one voice channel wide. they could wipe out entire ranges of shortwave bandwidth. OTH radar made life miserable for all the users of the shortwave bands. Not just militaries around the world, but shipping and boating, Amateur Radio operators, shortwave listeners, even diplomatic communication used shortwave. Luckily shortwave is slowly converting over to digital communication that is less susceptible to interference.

  • @marsgal42
    @marsgal42 7 лет назад +15

    I remember the woodpecker well from shortwave listening when I was in high school.
    Modern over-the-horizon radar (like the U.S. Navy stuff around the Gulf of Mexico) sounds more like a raspberry. :-)

    • @kusalg
      @kusalg 4 года назад

      silent because raspberries don't make any sound? Or is there something I don't know about raspberries?

    • @deathtrap5556
      @deathtrap5556 3 года назад +2

      @@kusalg a raspberry is the name given to a noise that babies often make when they put their tongue out with their lips closed and blow air

  • @Johnpugwash
    @Johnpugwash 2 года назад +1

    I was in the RAF as an Avionics Technician, on Chinooks and Puma's performing ARI functional checks, 1986 - 1988, Gutersloh. Heard these everytime.

  • @Rwededyet
    @Rwededyet 9 лет назад +56

    But it made a nice wall in that Insurgent movie.

    • @Rwededyet
      @Rwededyet 4 года назад

      @Nathaniel12345678910 Don't know, I just remembered seeing it in the movie and wondering how much of it was CGI. I didn't know it was real until I saw this video.

    • @waity5856
      @waity5856 4 года назад +1

      The series:
      Insurgent
      Divergent
      Detergent (it was Allegiant but Detergent is the better name)

    • @genelomas332
      @genelomas332 3 года назад +1

      @@waity5856 Actually.. Divergent, Insurgent, and Allegiant are the names, and the order, of the these movies..

    • @waity5856
      @waity5856 3 года назад

      @@genelomas332 Ah, ok

  • @vanpenguin22
    @vanpenguin22 4 года назад +3

    Years before it had become the stuff of Coast to Coast AM and all that, I routinely heard it surfing the short wave dial on my dad's Tanberg reciever.

  • @Riotlight
    @Riotlight 9 лет назад +122

    I never saw that in the S.T.A.L.K.E.R games! :(

    • @sandwich2473
      @sandwich2473 9 лет назад +31

      Riotlight Get out of here, Stalker!

    • @KlitorXproductions
      @KlitorXproductions 9 лет назад +48

      Riotlight it's actually the inspiration for the brainscorcher

    • @MarkDanov
      @MarkDanov 9 лет назад +10

      Riotlight Ever played Clear Sky? There's a miniaturized version of it there.

    • @Riotlight
      @Riotlight 9 лет назад

      Mark Dano
      Oh, actually i havent played that one!

    • @sandwich2473
      @sandwich2473 9 лет назад +1

      Riotlight Many would say that you shouldn't, it was alright. It wasn't as bad as many other games by other devs but it wasn't the strongest of the three S.T.A.L.KK.E.R. games.

  • @SonOfAnders73
    @SonOfAnders73 2 года назад +3

    Up until now

  • @lutzjamesa
    @lutzjamesa 9 лет назад +4

    When I first saw this in the drone footage I thought for a second that it was some crazy wall of turbine blades, but then I realized it had to be an antenna array of some sort. Glad to see a video about it!

  • @chazzer7564
    @chazzer7564 3 года назад +7

    Imagine being pulled all the way out here so Perseus could detonate those nukes

  • @sandwich2473
    @sandwich2473 9 лет назад +7

    Wow. That's a fairly impressive structure.

  • @Imgema
    @Imgema 8 лет назад +212

    So this monstrosity was the cheaper option then?

    • @heart0fthedrag0n
      @heart0fthedrag0n 7 лет назад +115

      Then satellites? Much MUCH cheaper. A hunk of steel like this, massive as it looks, costs next to nothing, compared to launching something into space.

    • @amperzand9162
      @amperzand9162 7 лет назад +47

      Well, not any more, but back in the sixties, yes.

    • @dobrev_p
      @dobrev_p 6 лет назад +29

      It actually cost twice as much as the neighbouring nuclear power plant. Highly recommend Chad Garcia's 2015 film The Russian Woodpecker, if you'd like some more details on it, straight from the source. People that actually worked there.

    • @GewelReal
      @GewelReal 6 лет назад +8

      Plamen Dobrev Still cheaper

    • @Balnazzardi
      @Balnazzardi 5 лет назад +4

      Ye this still cost big money, but building satellites and launching them to space was still way more expensive, atleast back then.
      Its interesting how Soviets went their own way of doing "shortcuts" and going for things that USA/west never would have, but then again they kind of had to, they could not compete against USA on many factors.....unfortunately in case of their nuclear power plants and RMBK reactors that also meant compromising safety....

  • @travisdickens8721
    @travisdickens8721 7 лет назад +15

    Hmm the brain scorcher is looking nice this time of year.

  • @himbeertoni08
    @himbeertoni08 2 года назад +1

    That thing and it's hunger for energy was the reason for building a nuclear power plant in close vicinity.

  • @comicatomics
    @comicatomics 3 года назад +8

    Bell betrays his team here

  • @bob8776
    @bob8776 Год назад +2

    The radio filters being nicknamed "Moscow mufflers" absolutely does it for me

  • @DonQuixoteLE
    @DonQuixoteLE 2 года назад +4

    What an interesting and topical video. Thanks Tom for your incredible, maybe unintentional, foresight

  • @coxsj
    @coxsj 9 лет назад +5

    Great stuff. You're onto something great with these vids - informative, interesting, relevant and pitched in layman's terms. Keep up the great work and thanks for sharing.

  • @xavierh.5102
    @xavierh.5102 6 лет назад +3

    doppler radars can be tricked by flying perpendicular and below the horizon to the radar dish, which means you have no relative motion and blend in with the ground clutter.
    not very useful for a nuclear missile (because it won't get anywhere if it's not heading towards it's target, duh) but the tactic is useful for avoiding radar guided missiles in aerial combat. I believe it's called "notching".

  • @trueriver1950
    @trueriver1950 3 года назад +2

    00:30 Powerful enough is only part of it and is nothing to do with it bouncing off the ionosphere. A traditional radar will not work over the horizon however powerful. That's because since invented in WW2 radar has used microwave frequencies.
    To bounce off the ionosphere you need to use much lower frequencies, which confusingly are called "High Frequency" for historical reasons. Ordinary short wave radio goes over the horizon for this reason: and a 1kW ham radio rig will easily talk to anywhere when the ionosphere is cooperating.
    The power is needed in order for the radar receiver to detect the return signal. It has to overcome the dissipation due to multiple bounces off the ionosphere but that is trivial compared to the fact that radar suffers a 1/d^4 effect, as the signal is reduced by a factor of distance squared in both directions.
    The power and the frequency are needed for different reasons
    To

  • @alwinpriven2400
    @alwinpriven2400 8 лет назад +11

    I like how you say "Duga". you need to stress the other syllable.

  • @L_U-K_E
    @L_U-K_E 3 года назад +2

    visiting there is on my bucket list :)

  • @vadiimt
    @vadiimt 2 года назад +2

    Well that last statement aged well

  • @richardhead1848
    @richardhead1848 3 года назад +4

    I can't believe shiey climbed that thing

  • @mikk150
    @mikk150 2 года назад +12

    This video ending aged like fine milk

  • @Liggliluff
    @Liggliluff 3 года назад +5

    (1:40) Would Soviet Union really measure missiles in miles per second? That sounds odd.

    • @pabloschrute
      @pabloschrute 3 года назад

      They would be moving Miles Per Sec so it isnt odd

    • @TheFulcrum2000
      @TheFulcrum2000 3 года назад +2

      @@pabloschrute Yes, but they would measure it in kilometers per second or meters per second, not miles ;-)

  • @MiceAndMinecraft
    @MiceAndMinecraft 9 лет назад +2

    There is a similarly sized array like this in South East Turkey near Diyabakir, owned by the Americans, I used to get to visit the base regularly for social events, they even had their own bowling alley :) iirc it was called Prinçlik (or Inçlik, I always got them confused)

  • @cylonjerboa4889
    @cylonjerboa4889 2 года назад +15

    Haha that aged well Tom :) "humanity got through the cold war" :)

  • @MrBeast9000
    @MrBeast9000 2 года назад +4

    feels alot different in 2022

  • @DaveP1991
    @DaveP1991 9 лет назад +46

    Amazing footage yet all I see is Brain Scorcher.

  • @billgreen576
    @billgreen576 2 года назад +1

    Humanity got through the cold war. And here we are in 2022 deciding to have another go.

  • @stormi2534
    @stormi2534 4 года назад +2

    The Russian Woodpecker reminds me of and looks like the wall from Divergent.

  • @Dollarx
    @Dollarx 8 лет назад +75

    reminds me of the wall from Divergent.

    • @charliespencer8740
      @charliespencer8740 8 лет назад +27

      This is what said wall was based on

    • @m4cksfx
      @m4cksfx 6 лет назад +5

      Wow. I've only seen that movie once a long time ago, hated it and promptly forgotten it. But this was exactly what I thought while watching this video!

    • @jukajoj2400
      @jukajoj2400 6 лет назад +5

      that is literally what it is. it was the thing that was filmed.

    • @timowesterdijk5840
      @timowesterdijk5840 6 лет назад +3

      www.imdb.com/title/tt1840309/locations They literally filmed the wall here

    • @Hibiscus.hunny.
      @Hibiscus.hunny. 5 лет назад

      That’s because it actually is!

  • @stormnr2
    @stormnr2 4 года назад +2

    i can still hear this signal in my radio!

  • @CrashTootall
    @CrashTootall 9 лет назад +1

    The drone footage was cool, but I noticed a bit of a rolling shutter effect happening. Try getting a better shock absorbing mount for the drone's camera. :-)

  • @Train115
    @Train115 5 месяцев назад

    It is worth mentioning, this is the receiver. The transmitter is in Liubech-1.

  • @Liquid_Mike
    @Liquid_Mike 2 года назад +1

    That part about "Moscow Mufflers" piqued my interest, I could watch an episode all about that

  • @logosfabula
    @logosfabula 9 лет назад +2

    I never knew of the "Russian woodpecker". Brilliant show, interesting facts as usual. Cheers!

  • @CrowellaAU
    @CrowellaAU 9 лет назад +1

    I was hoping you would do a video on Duga-3 while you are there. Amazing stuff. :)

  • @killuaop5169
    @killuaop5169 3 года назад +2

    Oh I’ve seen that in PUBG I thought it was power transporter in the Military base

  • @cinnamon4
    @cinnamon4 5 лет назад +5

    "Duga" translates as a "bow", like, not the weapon, but the curved line.

    • @_darquan
      @_darquan 2 года назад +1

      "Arc", I believe, is a better term.

  • @wisteela
    @wisteela 9 лет назад +1

    Excellent.
    Bionerd23 has a video of inside the place, with remains of the computer systems.

  • @bedboy7028
    @bedboy7028 6 лет назад +1

    Been there, outstanding piece of engineering...

  • @clray123
    @clray123 2 года назад +4

    "Humanity got through the Cold War" - naaah, not really.

  • @CowtownCoachGG
    @CowtownCoachGG 7 лет назад +1

    I was in ASA in the 70s and used to intercept and do sig analysis on this target, Elint to us

  • @lordomacron3719
    @lordomacron3719 2 года назад +1

    and what do you need to powerful such an array? how about a Nuclar power station

  • @SievertSchreiber
    @SievertSchreiber 2 года назад

    Videos like this is why I’m a proud follower of Tom Scott!

  • @YodaWasSith
    @YodaWasSith 2 года назад +32

    "Somehow, humanity got through the Cold War."
    I wouldn't be so sure of that, 7-year-ago Tom. Ah to be young and naive again.

    • @BluesDivinity
      @BluesDivinity 2 года назад +1

      Nah, he’s right, we got through it.

    • @KitsuNoir
      @KitsuNoir 2 года назад +1

      Cold war 2, electric boogaloo.

  • @ianmcclellan7695
    @ianmcclellan7695 3 года назад

    The RF doesn't bounce off the Ionosphere, it's refracted by the F layers and then the beam hits the ground in the target area. The beam then hits the objects and hits the ground again before it's reflected back to the ionosphere - refracted again and then received by the OTHR site. Plus, strictly speaking conventional radars can see out to about 200 to 250 nautical miles, but the signal is of course affected by the curvature of the Earth. What an OTHR can do is see far beyond a regular air defence radar's range and also doesn't suffer from the curvature issue.
    A specialist radar such as the one used at Fylingdales and other BMEWS sites can see beyond 250nm but it still suffers from the curvature problem - hence why OTHRs are used in certain countries.

  • @acmefixer1
    @acmefixer1 3 года назад +2

    The Radars I worked on in the Army were a half megawatt or 5 megawatts (AN/FPS-71), and there was a 10 megawatt HIPAR. But those were peak pulse power. The woodpecker put out high pulse power but the average power was lower.

  • @durexyl
    @durexyl 2 года назад +7

    And here we are in another cold war, just a few years after this video was published..

  • @TesserId
    @TesserId Год назад +1

    The obvious dipole elements are unlike anything I've seen. Would love to see some commentary on that from an antenna expert.

  • @seanet1310
    @seanet1310 7 лет назад +2

    OTHR is still a valid technology in use at various locations

  • @syedlam9632
    @syedlam9632 Год назад +3

    So this is the place Bell brought Adler

  • @adamc5057
    @adamc5057 2 года назад +2

    Satellites were hard to put up in the 1970’s?

    • @alex_inside
      @alex_inside 2 года назад +2

      Put them there? Not really. The hard part is to launch a constellation of them and make it reliable.

  • @doublem111
    @doublem111 8 лет назад +1

    Been here before and it truly is enormous. A great feat of engineering. But how did it differentiate between a missile and an aeroplane? Speed?

    • @siggyincr7447
      @siggyincr7447 5 лет назад +2

      Exactly, Transcontinental missiles would be traveling far faster than any plane. Thus the doppler shift would be greater. I'm sure they had filters for filtering out signals that didn't cross a certain speed threshold.

  • @HowCanWeEver
    @HowCanWeEver Год назад

    Great video and explanation.

  • @RoyWatkinson
    @RoyWatkinson 3 года назад

    Ive been waatching a lot of your videos - following this one Id love to see one on number stations

  • @chillingcammy1877
    @chillingcammy1877 2 года назад +1

    Super well shot, this video hits different post "special military operation"

  • @sudonim7552
    @sudonim7552 8 лет назад +1

    That the wall from Divergent

  • @FBuilding
    @FBuilding 5 лет назад +1

    I should replay Clear Sky someday. I played it when it was quite buggy unfortunately.

  • @jomialsipi
    @jomialsipi 9 лет назад +3

    It looks like the wall in Divergence, although it's probably the opposite.

    • @rossmac33
      @rossmac33 9 лет назад +4

      This radar array was actually the inspiration for the wall in Divergent

    • @SIMPhony
      @SIMPhony 9 лет назад +4

      Alexandre Simoneau It actually is.

  • @JustWickedSwede
    @JustWickedSwede 8 лет назад

    And woopdie dooo, now we're back into it!

    • @mchlbk
      @mchlbk 6 лет назад +1

      No. Russia's economy is about the same size as The Netherland's.

  • @dalejacksparrowson
    @dalejacksparrowson 9 лет назад

    That is some bad ass camera action up there! :O

  • @davidbarton1928
    @davidbarton1928 3 года назад +1

    Side on it looks a bit like rollercoaster scaffolding. I wonder if it can be repurposed?

  • @chiffmonkey
    @chiffmonkey 9 лет назад +3

    If this is Duga-3, and the matching one is 60km away, and the zone is only 30km, what's Duga-1, which is in the zone?

    • @citizenerased1992
      @citizenerased1992 6 лет назад +1

      The sister base was dismantled for scrap. This one was left in place on acount of the difficulty of moving it and the fact irradiated steel was of no commercial value. A small segment of the Duga 3 was dismantled before the project was abandoned.

    • @mspenrice
      @mspenrice 6 лет назад

      You don't need to be in "the zone" to have been affected by the fallout. The cloud that billowed out of Chernobyl spread across most of northern Europe. The radar station would have been at least as contaminated as, say, the farm animals of Scandinavia and north England, seeing as it's basically a big ol' sieve poking up towards the heavens. And outdoor metalwork, from bicycles on up, that gets a serious dose of neutron activation remains radioactive and dangerous to spend extended periods near to (or astride, or inside) for a good long time.
      The evacuation was partly because the town itself bore the brunt of the initial localised fallout and irradiation, partly because they had no idea just how bad things might get and if the other reactors might also blow, partly to get the civilians out of the way of the militarised cleanup operation, and partly as a cover up exercise that rapidly fell apart. Plus if you have something like that which you _really_ don't want unauthorised randoms getting too close to or even interfering with, a 30km radius (I presume it's a radius and not a diameter; this would also mean there's a slim chance that there could be two radar stations 60km apart that are both *just* inside the zone) gives you a good chance of spotting them on the approach or at least picking them up on their way back out. It's essentially a day's walk in both directions, especially if you're moving off-road.

  • @YoungManDub
    @YoungManDub 3 года назад +4

    C'mon Bell!

  • @RobMacKendrick
    @RobMacKendrick 3 года назад +1

    I well remember this as an SWL back in the 70s. The Cold War produced all kinds of creepy radio, some of which is still out thére. (K station, anyone?)

  • @Rocketman88002
    @Rocketman88002 2 года назад

    An interesting antenna array!

  • @smalltime0
    @smalltime0 9 лет назад

    Going there tomorrow! Very excited.

  • @Falcrist
    @Falcrist 9 лет назад +1

    For a minute I thought you were saying they were detecting the blue-shifting of the radio waves bouncing off of an incoming object. I was extremely impressed for a minute.
    Then I realized they could just look at the ratatatat pattern for frequency shifts. Now I'm just moderately impressed.

    • @LHommeDeCave
      @LHommeDeCave 9 лет назад

      Blue shift doesn't occur in sound waves, you meant compression though I assume, as blue shift would be correct if it was EM radiation

    • @Falcrist
      @Falcrist 9 лет назад +1

      Robert Backhaus They're not looking for blueshifting. Their equipment probably isn't NEARLY sensitive enough for that. Instead, they're looking at the structure of the signal to detect changes in its length. It's much easier that way.

    • @Falcrist
      @Falcrist 9 лет назад +1

      LHommeDeCave Radio waves ARE electromagnetic radiation. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_wave

    • @LHommeDeCave
      @LHommeDeCave 9 лет назад

      Yeah my mistake, I misunderstood

  • @rextransformation7418
    @rextransformation7418 2 года назад +3

    I uh... think you gotta update this video...

  • @VioletRosesmith
    @VioletRosesmith 9 лет назад +16

    That is one ugly Goliath of a construction. Very Soviet.

    • @daniel117100
      @daniel117100 9 лет назад +29

      That's because Russians build for purpose and not looks

    • @therealpanse
      @therealpanse 9 лет назад +1

      charlichigo HAARP is about the same size...

    • @JadeSune
      @JadeSune 9 лет назад

      daniel117100 On principle of the fact that the public ownership of the means of production necessarily leads to economic ruin due to the inability to calculate, and led to more deaths than any institution in the world, I wouldn't frame anything about the Soviets or their work in a positive light. The Russian people, on the other hand, I like them rather a lot.
      To me, it's like you're saying "Stalin slaughtered with good intentions," while probably true, in some very limited capacity due to the relationship of the workers with their overlords, it conveys no merit to the things. Generally, Soviet constructions functioned just about as well as they looked.

    • @ImtheHitcher
      @ImtheHitcher 9 лет назад +3

      Jaedrik Cobalt Ever seen the Monty Python sketch "What have the romans ever done for us!?".... You remind me of that but with the Soviets, all they ever gave us were; space travel, open heart surgery, satellites, the principle of lasers and (of course) Tetris- Off the top of my head, there are obviously more.
      You may hate their politics, but we may not even be having this little chat without their inventions.

    • @VioletRosesmith
      @VioletRosesmith 9 лет назад

      So much pathetic Russian butt licking going on..
      Think what you want, the Soviet Union sucked balls at almost everything. "function over form".. shame they have neither anymore.

  • @jakobbruhspenning
    @jakobbruhspenning 4 года назад +1

    At 0:22 there is a small black streek on the screen on the top left side, is that an effect of radiation on the camera or does anyone have the explanation?

  • @jevicci
    @jevicci 9 лет назад +1

    I wonder how this differs from the United States' BMEWS (Ballistic Missile Early Warning System).

  • @Scroolewse
    @Scroolewse 2 года назад

    I remember learning about Signals Intelligence a long time ago they told us we'd probably pick up the woodpecker at some point

  • @TheBlazeofSteel
    @TheBlazeofSteel 9 лет назад

    Nice camera work

  • @hrzmann
    @hrzmann 2 года назад +2

    Little did you know, my friend.