Not sure if anyone gives a shit but if you are bored like me atm you can stream all of the new movies and series on Instaflixxer. I've been binge watching with my brother for the last couple of months xD
When taking these same X-rays for a sprained foot…they had me standing up rather then lying down, a total of 3 pictures where taken like in your video..is there any difference in the results or a reason why they would do it standing up versus lying down? Wondering why it was done differently? I appreciate your video and your help. thank you!
If the Achilles tendon is ruptured x-ray will likely show some evidence of swelling and attenuation of the fat (Kager sign) but will not show the ruptured tendon.
Centre to the joint space, then angle the tube to reduce dose and scatter. Tube angulation does not change the position of the focus, so it does not change the geometry of the projection even though 75% of radiographers believe it does.
@@egebamyasi773 The position of the focus determines the projection of anatomical structures. Pushing the tube angulation button and angling the tube does not change the position of the focus so the way the structures are projected does not change. The only change is collimation. To correct the projection exactly as you demonstrate, but improve the collimation, centre on the joint, then angle the tube caudally until the foot is collimated off. Test this for yourself. Put an object in the LBD light and angle the tube and you will notice that the shadow does not change. 75% of qualifieds believe that tube angulation in this way changes the projection. Only 5% of radiologists make this mistake because they have not been brainwashed by text books copying the technique used in 1920.
@@egebamyasi773 If you did that, the beam would hit the roof and miss the patient. Take the Townes skull projection for example. The books tell you 30 degrees down and centre on the hairline, but that will needlessly irradiate the face and the thyroid. So follow the text book instructions, then angle less so the collimation is above the eyes. No change in the required presentation of the anatomy. 30 million people had radiation doses to their faces for no reason. So centre on the ankle joint, then angle the tube and only the collimation changes. I have not been allowed to publish the two papers I presented at national conferences in Australia because there are no references and because the president of the institute failed the test. I made this RUclips a long time ago but no radiographer will share it because it is either an admission they have misunderstood something obvious, or that the recipient is equally uneducated. ruclips.net/video/mZPD_gLs5Dw/видео.html
@@egebamyasi773 Did you watch the video? Has it rocked the foundations of what you believed about radiography? I presented papers at Australian national conferences in 1988 and 2014 and the profession ignored the problem because it mean admitting that they were doing a shit job and had been for a century. In 1987 the president of the institute was outraged that I was implying that radiographers didn't understand something so obvious. In 2016 the president of the institute failed the geometry test.
Yes, you can see the entire lateral malleolus in the mortise view. I am not sure why a lateral view is not necessary for distal fib tip ... perhaps it is because you see it well enough in the other views?
The best channel for x-ray anatomy in RUclips, it is very helpful for us. Thank you Dr. Morton
Thank you doctor. I just started my internship as an X-ray technician and this helps review my knowledge a lot! Simple and effective.
Thanks for spoiling us. Lots of short vids lately🌠✨✔️🦶
Always high quality videos. Thank you from Australia
Not sure if anyone gives a shit but if you are bored like me atm you can stream all of the new movies and series on Instaflixxer. I've been binge watching with my brother for the last couple of months xD
@Jett Westley Yea, I have been using instaflixxer for since november myself :)
@@jettwestley3033 qQ
this was so helpful
When taking these same X-rays for a sprained foot…they had me standing up rather then lying down, a total of 3 pictures where taken like in your video..is there any difference in the results or a reason why they would do it standing up versus lying down? Wondering why it was done differently? I appreciate your video and your help. thank you!
Thank you very much from Egypt
Welcome! Thanks Ahmed ... Greetings from Utah :)
Good job 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
I did an avulsion fracture on the distal fibula on Saturday going to see on orthopedic next Tuesday
Excellent!
Thank you! Cheers!
your voice has a great degree of resemblance to Sal Khan
Thnk you😘
Will xray show ruptured achilles tendon
If the Achilles tendon is ruptured x-ray will likely show some evidence of swelling and attenuation of the fat (Kager sign) but will not show the ruptured tendon.
@@TheNotedAnatomist Thank you
Mri will
Centre to the joint space, then angle the tube to reduce dose and scatter. Tube angulation does not change the position of the focus, so it does not change the geometry of the projection even though 75% of radiographers believe it does.
Tube angulation has major effect on anatomical structures.
@@egebamyasi773 The position of the focus determines the projection of anatomical structures. Pushing the tube angulation button and angling the tube does not change the position of the focus so the way the structures are projected does not change. The only change is collimation. To correct the projection exactly as you demonstrate, but improve the collimation, centre on the joint, then angle the tube caudally until the foot is collimated off.
Test this for yourself. Put an object in the LBD light and angle the tube and you will notice that the shadow does not change. 75% of qualifieds believe that tube angulation in this way changes the projection. Only 5% of radiologists make this mistake because they have not been brainwashed by text books copying the technique used in 1920.
Ok so you angle the tube 45° on a inferosupierior axial shoulder and tell me it doesn't fuck up the anatomy. @@thevoiceharmonic
@@egebamyasi773 If you did that, the beam would hit the roof and miss the patient.
Take the Townes skull projection for example. The books tell you 30 degrees down and centre on the hairline, but that will needlessly irradiate the face and the thyroid. So follow the text book instructions, then angle less so the collimation is above the eyes. No change in the required presentation of the anatomy. 30 million people had radiation doses to their faces for no reason.
So centre on the ankle joint, then angle the tube and only the collimation changes. I have not been allowed to publish the two papers I presented at national conferences in Australia because there are no references and because the president of the institute failed the test.
I made this RUclips a long time ago but no radiographer will share it because it is either an admission they have misunderstood something obvious, or that the recipient is equally uneducated.
ruclips.net/video/mZPD_gLs5Dw/видео.html
@@egebamyasi773 Did you watch the video? Has it rocked the foundations of what you believed about radiography? I presented papers at Australian national conferences in 1988 and 2014 and the profession ignored the problem because it mean admitting that they were doing a shit job and had been for a century. In 1987 the president of the institute was outraged that I was implying that radiographers didn't understand something so obvious. In 2016 the president of the institute failed the geometry test.
❤❤
Does a mortise view show the entire lateral malleolus?
How come a lateral view is not necessary for the distal fibular tip?
Thank you
Yes, you can see the entire lateral malleolus in the mortise view.
I am not sure why a lateral view is not necessary for distal fib tip ... perhaps it is because you see it well enough in the other views?
Wish me luck on my first X-ray on my ankle. I just hope it’s not fractured 😔😔😔
How'd it go
Saym cetovtion
So helpful video …thx from 🇸🇦🇸🇦🤍🤍🤍