In my local masjid we do not currently have an imam, but there is someone who replaces him but that person rarely comes to the masjid, I am neither the one who knows the Quran nor the best example to follow but even so they choose me and tell me to be the imam sometimes. The problem is that I have many shaytan wispers in my prayer, whenever they tell me to go out I tell them no but they insist. What should I do ?
Tell them about your shaitan whispers. Seek help and they will understand. And get counciling from an Imam for it. Being imaam will help you focus and lead. don't let Shaitan trick you Akhi May Allah make it easy for you.
I used to have shaytan wispers during prayer too. So here is what helped for me: - Reciting quran slowly but aloud. When you teach yourself to recite slowly and aloud, you really need a strong concentration. The good news is that you can train this. I use tarteel to alert me when I skip an ayah. At some point you’ll be able to recite in front of people without mistakes - Do your wudhu in the best possible way: don’t waste too much water and follow all sunnah things our prophet saw did in terms of cleanliness/cleaning himself - pray tahajjud: tahajjud stops shaytan from making knots in your head when you’re sleeping. It helps me with overall focus and energy during the day - during each salah imagine Allah standing in front of you and try to pray being aware that he is watching you People see the potential in you so insha allah you’ll be able to fulfill this wonderful option to lead people in prayer
@@hassanawdi3793the majority of you do. It is a disappointment that the mathhab that has prided itself on championing the thaqalain, have failed to uphold the greater of the two; the book of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). As well as the minor thiql (as Sunnis narrate more Hadiths from Ahlulbayt despite the more strict Sunni hadith method) Where is the Mushaf which the Imams narrate and transmit from each other? Where is the chain of: Al-‘Askari from the way of Al-Hadi from Al- Jawad from Al-Ridaa form Al-Kazim from Al-Sadiq from Al-Baqir from Zayn Al-‘Abideen from Al-Husien (the grandson of the Prophet) or Al-Hasan (the grandson of the Prophet) from Ali [May Allah be pleased with them all]? Did the students of these Imams narrate everything from them except the Quran? If the Companions were Apostates, especially the famous ones from among them, and they were the ones that transmitted the Quran: How can a Shi’ah trust the narration of those who he believe are Apostates? This Quran that is between our hands today, is from the narration of those companions of the Prophet [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household] The difference between Sunni and Shia is that our scholars unanimously agree that the Quran is not distorted you can use as many weak hadith as you want. You won't hear any ridiculous scholars and personalities of Sunni Islam mouthing off these ridiculous things like Shias do despite the Shias being only 10% and Sunnis being majority. You'd think since there are more Sunnis you'd find more ridiculous claims like this coming from Sunnis but it is opposite. For that reason you will find that the scholars of Ahl Al-Sunnah are strict in this matter, and say that whoever says that the Quran is Muharaf is a Kaffir, and they clearly declare such a thing based on what Allah the Exalted said: {Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian}Hijr 15:9 Any sunni who believes that a part of Qur'an has been lost due to goats eating it or men changing it, is a kafir. There is no difference of opinion on this in sunni Islam. No buts no ifs. Your misunderstanding does not change our stance. Aisha (ra) did not believe in tahreef. Stop putting your own view on the hadith. You are just seeing what you want to see. It wouldn't have mattered if goats ate it because people memorise the Qur'an. What you're basically going to find is that this will likely lead into the topic of abrogation and abrogation was completed whilst the Prophet (pbuh) was alive. Islamqa covers this very well. Shias might attempt to steal the chains in the Sunni books and attribute them to themselves, which is pathetic and shows the weakness of their way. `Asim bin abi al-Nujoud, Hafs bin Sulayman and Hamzah al-Zayyat are all great Imams of Ahlul-Sunnah, the Twelvers cannot prove that they were Rafidhi imami Shia neither through their books or ours. If they were to prove that they were Shia, the Shia of the time were Sunni in their worship, and even if they try their best to prove that they were Rafidhah, then even the Imamiyyah at the time had different sects all of them enemies who make Takfeer on each-other. By consensus`Asim and Hafs are two great Imams of Qira’at. The weakness attributed to Hafs is in regards to his skills as narrator, and the accusation of him being a liar is a baseless exaggeration. And if true still doesn’t strengthen Shia’s view. The rules for the authentication of a narrator in a Hadithi chain are different than the rules for the authentication of a Qur’ani recitation. Hundreds of narrations from their infallibles prove that the followers of Ibn Saba claim distortion, and the statement that the chains of transmission of these narrations are weak cannot be accepted for reasons such as: First: The Shiites do not consider the chains of transmission and their lim il rijjal (hadeeth sciences) is very inconsistent Second: The narrations of distortion are abundant (mutawatir) according to them, and if this were the case, their chain of transmission should not be of concern Third: There are Shiite scholars who authenticated the chains of narrations of Hadiths regarding distortion Fourth: Whoever rejects the many narrations about distortion, which amount to nearly two thousand narrations, is obligated to reject the narrations of the Imamate and the narrations of the rajah, the bidaa, and the infallibility, because as their their scholar, Yusuf Al-Bahrani, said: If these narrations aren’t accepted (i.e. the narrations of distortion), despite their abundance and spread, it would be possible to reject to the other narrations related to the religion, since the principles are one, as are the chains, narrators, sheikhs, and transmission. M. Baqir al-Majlisi also said that Shia narrations that speak of the corruption and distortion of the very text of the Qur’an area at the same level as narrations that support the Shia belief in Imamah. There are over 1000 [Shia] Hadiths confirming speaking of the corruption of the Qur’an. If the Hadiths of Tahrif in Shia books are rejected by sensible Shias, then they are no longer in any position to object why their entire collections of Hadiths should be rejected from A-Z as the same “liars” who attributed the “lie” of the distortion of the Qur’an to the Ahl al-Bayt, narrated also others “lies and exaggerations” [Imamah, Wilayah, ‘Ismah, Ghuluw etc.]. The narrations of distortion that the Shiites have are narrated from the twelve imams who believe in their infallibility, while all those who narrate the absence of distortion from him are the scholars, not the imams. They do not narrate from the imams, and not a single narration says that there is no distortion. Rather, they transmit two thousand narrations from the imams that say there is distortion, and those from whom they quote that there is no distortion are scholars who can aren’t infallible. As for the infallible ones, they quoted from them the statement of distortion, so the Shiites are required to take the words of the infallible ones and not the words of others. Nimat Allah Al-Jazairi said: The narrations that indicate distortion exceed two thousand hadiths. Then he said: He did not come across a single hadith that said otherwise. Yusuf Al-Bahrani said: However, there is no opposition to this narration, as I know, other than a mere claim that is devoid of evidence and does not go beyond mere gossip. All shias should either follow their infallibles or leave this evil religion of Ibn Saba here is a list of references of Shia scholars: Fihrist of shia scholars and their believe in tahrif of Quran
I think the brother has doubts in himself so he just acts out around muslims so they can support him out of his negativity.
I wish I can talk to him and potentially help him understand how his stubbornness is from Shaitan
In my local masjid we do not currently have an imam, but there is someone who replaces him but that person rarely comes to the masjid, I am neither the one who knows the Quran nor the best example to follow but even so they choose me and tell me to be the imam sometimes. The problem is that I have many shaytan wispers in my prayer, whenever they tell me to go out I tell them no but they insist. What should I do ?
Tell them about your shaitan whispers. Seek help and they will understand. And get counciling from an Imam for it.
Being imaam will help you focus and lead.
don't let Shaitan trick you Akhi
May Allah make it easy for you.
@@gasserhegazy1267 Ameen, jazak allah khairan
I used to have shaytan wispers during prayer too. So here is what helped for me:
- Reciting quran slowly but aloud. When you teach yourself to recite slowly and aloud, you really need a strong concentration. The good news is that you can train this. I use tarteel to alert me when I skip an ayah. At some point you’ll be able to recite in front of people without mistakes
- Do your wudhu in the best possible way: don’t waste too much water and follow all sunnah things our prophet saw did in terms of cleanliness/cleaning himself
- pray tahajjud: tahajjud stops shaytan from making knots in your head when you’re sleeping. It helps me with overall focus and energy during the day
- during each salah imagine Allah standing in front of you and try to pray being aware that he is watching you
People see the potential in you so insha allah you’ll be able to fulfill this wonderful option to lead people in prayer
@@KamilaTekin jazak allah khairan
🙊 well, you are nobody to judge, even if you get to speak with him "personally"
And who told u this?
Kid
Shias...
Probably a Shia
Shouldn't make assumptions like that
Not all of us Shia do that
@@hassanawdi3793the majority of you do.
It is a disappointment that the mathhab that has prided itself on championing the thaqalain, have failed to uphold the greater of the two; the book of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). As well as the minor thiql (as Sunnis narrate more Hadiths from Ahlulbayt despite the more strict Sunni hadith method)
Where is the Mushaf which the Imams narrate and transmit from each other?
Where is the chain of: Al-‘Askari from the way of Al-Hadi from Al- Jawad from Al-Ridaa form Al-Kazim from Al-Sadiq from Al-Baqir from Zayn Al-‘Abideen from Al-Husien (the grandson of the Prophet) or Al-Hasan (the grandson of the Prophet) from Ali [May Allah be pleased with them all]?
Did the students of these Imams narrate everything from them except the Quran?
If the Companions were Apostates, especially the famous ones from among them, and they were the ones that transmitted the Quran: How can a Shi’ah trust the narration of those who he believe are Apostates? This Quran that is between our hands today, is from the narration of those companions of the Prophet [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household]
The difference between Sunni and Shia is that our scholars unanimously agree that the Quran is not distorted you can use as many weak hadith as you want. You won't hear any ridiculous scholars and personalities of Sunni Islam mouthing off these ridiculous things like Shias do despite the Shias being only 10% and Sunnis being majority. You'd think since there are more Sunnis you'd find more ridiculous claims like this coming from Sunnis but it is opposite.
For that reason you will find that the scholars of Ahl Al-Sunnah are strict in this matter, and say that whoever says that the Quran is Muharaf is a Kaffir, and they clearly declare such a thing based on what Allah the Exalted said: {Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian}Hijr 15:9
Any sunni who believes that a part of Qur'an has been lost due to goats eating it or men changing it, is a kafir. There is no difference of opinion on this in sunni Islam. No buts no ifs. Your misunderstanding does not change our stance. Aisha (ra) did not believe in tahreef. Stop putting your own view on the hadith. You are just seeing what you want to see. It wouldn't have mattered if goats ate it because people memorise the Qur'an. What you're basically going to find is that this will likely lead into the topic of abrogation and abrogation was completed whilst the Prophet (pbuh) was alive. Islamqa covers this very well.
Shias might attempt to steal the chains in the Sunni books and attribute them to themselves, which is pathetic and shows the weakness of their way. `Asim bin abi al-Nujoud, Hafs bin Sulayman and Hamzah al-Zayyat are all great Imams of Ahlul-Sunnah, the Twelvers cannot prove that they were Rafidhi imami Shia neither through their books or ours. If they were to prove that they were Shia, the Shia of the time were Sunni in their worship, and even if they try their best to prove that they were Rafidhah, then even the Imamiyyah at the time had different sects all of them enemies who make Takfeer on each-other.
By consensus`Asim and Hafs are two great Imams of Qira’at. The weakness attributed to Hafs is in regards to his skills as narrator, and the accusation of him being a liar is a baseless exaggeration. And if true still doesn’t strengthen Shia’s view.
The rules for the authentication of a narrator in a Hadithi chain are different than the rules for the authentication of a Qur’ani recitation.
Hundreds of narrations from their infallibles prove that the followers of Ibn Saba claim distortion, and the statement that the chains of transmission of these narrations are weak cannot be accepted for reasons such as:
First: The Shiites do not consider the chains of transmission and their lim il rijjal (hadeeth sciences) is very inconsistent
Second: The narrations of distortion are abundant (mutawatir) according to them, and if this were the case, their chain of transmission should not be of concern
Third: There are Shiite scholars who authenticated the chains of narrations of Hadiths regarding distortion
Fourth: Whoever rejects the many narrations about distortion, which amount to nearly two thousand narrations, is obligated to reject the narrations of the Imamate and the narrations of the rajah, the bidaa, and the infallibility, because as their their scholar, Yusuf Al-Bahrani, said: If these narrations aren’t accepted (i.e. the narrations of distortion), despite their abundance and spread, it would be possible to reject to the other narrations related to the religion, since the principles are one, as are the chains, narrators, sheikhs, and transmission.
M. Baqir al-Majlisi also said that Shia narrations that speak of the corruption and distortion of the very text of the Qur’an area at the same level as narrations that support the Shia belief in Imamah. There are over 1000 [Shia] Hadiths confirming speaking of the corruption of the Qur’an. If the Hadiths of Tahrif in Shia books are rejected by sensible Shias, then they are no longer in any position to object why their entire collections of Hadiths should be rejected from A-Z as the same “liars” who attributed the “lie” of the distortion of the Qur’an to the Ahl al-Bayt, narrated also others “lies and exaggerations” [Imamah, Wilayah, ‘Ismah, Ghuluw etc.].
The narrations of distortion that the Shiites have are narrated from the twelve imams who believe in their infallibility, while all those who narrate the absence of distortion from him are the scholars, not the imams. They do not narrate from the imams, and not a single narration says that there is no distortion. Rather, they transmit two thousand narrations from the imams that say there is distortion, and those from whom they quote that there is no distortion are scholars who can aren’t infallible. As for the infallible ones, they quoted from them the statement of distortion, so the Shiites are required to take the words of the infallible ones and not the words of others.
Nimat Allah Al-Jazairi said: The narrations that indicate distortion exceed two thousand hadiths. Then he said: He did not come across a single hadith that said otherwise.
Yusuf Al-Bahrani said: However, there is no opposition to this narration, as I know, other than a mere claim that is devoid of evidence and does not go beyond mere gossip.
All shias should either follow their infallibles or leave this evil religion of Ibn Saba
here is a list of references of Shia scholars:
Fihrist of shia scholars and their believe in tahrif of Quran