Next ship they release is gonna be a CV with 200k HP that can take damage only if hit under the keel, has auto heal, autorepair, auto ASW, auto hydro, auto radar with 5seconds cd unlimited charges, 12x381mm secondaries with 2.3sec reload, 4x12 torp launchers each side, max speed 340 knots, instant acceleration/decelaration, has the ability to clone itself and teleport to the next match so that it can have x2 fun, squadrons of 40 planes with 250% chance for fire/flooding, can citadel any ship from any angle, auto attack, the ability to auto-reflect any AA returning 150% damage to attacking ships. Finally has an F button that when pressed wins both matches instantly at the same time.
At Ru we cannot use boost underwater, it automatically cancels out. EU Archerfish is wildly different from Ru as she launches a single torp per click and has combat instructions, while Ru one launches full salvo at click and has no CIs and no engine boost. Looking at it now it seems like buffed up Balao. Given that Ru players are more incline to kill subs on site, plays like this are extremely rare, tho not non-existant. As a Gato player with 2 mils XP I can tell this play would have been impossible if enemy sub was present on the flank. Also it could have been coutered by carrierborne ASW that are auto lock. Call Ru players deranged for calling it a skill issue, when we know it clearly is, it won't change the fact that red team simply gave themselves to this sub, they haven't repositioned, they weren't calling for their CV to step in which case the sub player would have had to retreat or remain underwater for the whole time. And the best thing they could do was to run away. Sub players hate when you run away, they have to chase you exposing their movement pattern. Lots of things can be said about this replay, but take it with a grain of salt. Not every game- like this, not every player- like these guys. All in all GG to sub player. He used his opportunity to its max. Well EU homing torps are busted, not gonna lie))
Absolute gameplay poison. Rock, paper, scissors, landmine. None of the other boats made any mistakes in position or gameplay, they just got crapped on by unseen and uncounterable opponent. Not a fan.
Yes and no. Submarines still are not well integrated, so your excellent first analogy is accurate 🙂 But for counterplay, both the aircraft carrier and Moskva had options, but the team on that flank were playing very passively, and arguably, obliviously. What I also think hurt is the matchmaking, as no destroyer available on that flank to. This is also because of poor game design / balance, trying to fit five classes into 12 ships per side. So, overall, I agree with you, just for different reasons 🙂
@@scotty5166 Hunting the sub would have been difficult because of its stupid speed for sure, but a DD could still have helped screen it out and make the subs life tougher. Of course, death to the sub would be ideal, and with a little more spotting from a DD, maybe it could have happened. But that speed, and extra repairs, AND healing on the sub is silly.
@@scotty5166Well if BB's are silly enough not to move at all then they deserve to be sunk, But with homing torps there is no "just dodge" when you are in a slow T10 BB that takes nearly 1km to do a turn. I'm fine with subs having dumb fire torps that hit even harder than Shimakaze DD torps if they remove homing torps from game, Sub players would have to get in closer, More fun for them taking more risk but the reward is their torps are going to have a major impact in game if they hit. The ping is also ridiculous, Should be like a minute cool down for sub pings if they ping more than 3 times in a minute, Or there needs to be a separate damage control party to counter subs.
I've been arguing against this ship for a short while now. Stating how Overpowered it is. We can clearly see in this video as all of those enemy ships were not really doing anything wrong.. They just had no viable tools to locate, track, and actually damage the sub.. Yet with all we know about the sub with it's stats and capabilities.. There are still deranged players who are saying that the Archerfish is not Overpowered, and that everyone else is just skill issue...
Maybe because each situation/video is different. In this one, the sub might be OP, but in other videos, people just ignore the sub. As a sub player, some games, I’m OP. Other games I’m locked down and can’t do much of anything. For example, where is the red sub?
Demented WG and why do you upload the video of subs, its just sad....here is the proof of the shit that are subs... they shoud hawe no heal and homing torps
Next ship they release is gonna be a CV with 200k HP that can take damage only if hit under the keel, has auto heal, autorepair, auto ASW, auto hydro, auto radar with 5seconds cd unlimited charges, 12x381mm secondaries with 2.3sec reload, 4x12 torp launchers each side, max speed 340 knots, instant acceleration/decelaration, has the ability to clone itself and teleport to the next match so that it can have x2 fun, squadrons of 40 planes with 250% chance for fire/flooding, can citadel any ship from any angle, auto attack, the ability to auto-reflect any AA returning 150% damage to attacking ships. Finally has an F button that when pressed wins both matches instantly at the same time.
Engine boost, a heal and 29 second reloads??? Nothing like WG and their "hold my vodka" creations.
At Ru we cannot use boost underwater, it automatically cancels out. EU Archerfish is wildly different from Ru as she launches a single torp per click and has combat instructions, while Ru one launches full salvo at click and has no CIs and no engine boost. Looking at it now it seems like buffed up Balao.
Given that Ru players are more incline to kill subs on site, plays like this are extremely rare, tho not non-existant. As a Gato player with 2 mils XP I can tell this play would have been impossible if enemy sub was present on the flank. Also it could have been coutered by carrierborne ASW that are auto lock. Call Ru players deranged for calling it a skill issue, when we know it clearly is, it won't change the fact that red team simply gave themselves to this sub, they haven't repositioned, they weren't calling for their CV to step in which case the sub player would have had to retreat or remain underwater for the whole time. And the best thing they could do was to run away. Sub players hate when you run away, they have to chase you exposing their movement pattern.
Lots of things can be said about this replay, but take it with a grain of salt. Not every game- like this, not every player- like these guys.
All in all GG to sub player. He used his opportunity to its max.
Well EU homing torps are busted, not gonna lie))
Every ship can be OP if the situation allows it. For example, where is the red sub? He should be all over this guy.
unless the red sub was an archerfish it couldnt even get near it, this thing does 45knots
Absolute gameplay poison. Rock, paper, scissors, landmine. None of the other boats made any mistakes in position or gameplay, they just got crapped on by unseen and uncounterable opponent. Not a fan.
Yes and no. Submarines still are not well integrated, so your excellent first analogy is accurate 🙂 But for counterplay, both the aircraft carrier and Moskva had options, but the team on that flank were playing very passively, and arguably, obliviously. What I also think hurt is the matchmaking, as no destroyer available on that flank to. This is also because of poor game design / balance, trying to fit five classes into 12 ships per side. So, overall, I agree with you, just for different reasons 🙂
@@tramapolean not many destroyers do 45 knots, most couldnt even catch this sub
@@scotty5166 Hunting the sub would have been difficult because of its stupid speed for sure, but a DD could still have helped screen it out and make the subs life tougher. Of course, death to the sub would be ideal, and with a little more spotting from a DD, maybe it could have happened. But that speed, and extra repairs, AND healing on the sub is silly.
Remove homing torps on all subs, Just have dumb fire torpedo's and most players could live with subs in game.
gato has those and its a monster
@@scotty5166Well if BB's are silly enough not to move at all then they deserve to be sunk, But with homing torps there is no "just dodge" when you are in a slow T10 BB that takes nearly 1km to do a turn.
I'm fine with subs having dumb fire torps that hit even harder than Shimakaze DD torps if they remove homing torps from game, Sub players would have to get in closer, More fun for them taking more risk but the reward is their torps are going to have a major impact in game if they hit.
The ping is also ridiculous, Should be like a minute cool down for sub pings if they ping more than 3 times in a minute, Or there needs to be a separate damage control party to counter subs.
I've been arguing against this ship for a short while now. Stating how Overpowered it is. We can clearly see in this video as all of those enemy ships were not really doing anything wrong.. They just had no viable tools to locate, track, and actually damage the sub.. Yet with all we know about the sub with it's stats and capabilities.. There are still deranged players who are saying that the Archerfish is not Overpowered, and that everyone else is just skill issue...
Maybe because each situation/video is different. In this one, the sub might be OP, but in other videos, people just ignore the sub. As a sub player, some games, I’m OP. Other games I’m locked down and can’t do much of anything.
For example, where is the red sub?
Demented WG and why do you upload the video of subs, its just sad....here is the proof of the shit that are subs... they shoud hawe no heal and homing torps