It's a pity they don't apply the same level of determination, commitment, drive, enthusiasm and perseverance to upholding the law as they do to protecting their fragile egos.
@lamseyaudits no pal @TheBrawlBox is channel admin, so does show up with my name, but when you click on the message, it should say on behalf of the channel.
This tiny insignificant dump and it’s equally inept staff embarrassed themselves a year or two back. You’d think they’d have learnt from that experience. 🙄
How can police keep stating that government owned property is private, how can they claim it’s private when the public pay their wages and pay for the public property. So you can be there if you have business but not if you need help
Little thing that bug's me about the Police is seeing standing around with their hands in their pockets and chewing gum. Would be nice if I heard you say something about it
This was NEVER about it being private property, it was all about some people seeing something they didn't like and then abusing their power by ordering people to do what they say. They could have just ignored you and gone about their day and you would have left, but instead they take ANY chance to not do their actual job and instead abuse their power.
If the public are allowed to be there to make complaint to the Plod, then it is a publicly accessible space and anyone can be there for other reasons. Marti, have you considered doing a silent audit?
@@colinpryor4290 I feel confused so I apologise in advance. You didn't think im Marti right? I'm not the guy who did the video in case thats what you were thinking. Apologies if im a dumbdumb ;)
if it is funded by the taxpayer then it is public property, even if it is a private premises that the police or government are renting, the second it becomes tax payer funded it becomes public, there is no trespass from a police station because it's public, every time the police eject or remove someone from police premises without an actual crime being committed they are the ones breaking the law, they can't just tell you you're trespassing on public property and use force.
Last year the York Press posted a report about some guy who was fined heavily for refusing to leave the grounds of the police head quarters in Northallerton. His companion, who must have previous convictions, received a custodial sentence.
11:20 Making up laws on the fly. Standard police procedure. The Criminal Law Act of 1977 does cover some trespass issues. But not at a police station. Only residential, embassies, with weapons or using violence. And reasonable force is never allowed to be used immediately unless the situation requires it to be used to protect persons or property.
@@mikeel6074 You didn't read the legislation properly. Section 3 of the 1967 act is about the use of force to make an arrest. Not to remove someone from someplace. The 1977 act covers trespass. But in specific places. And with weapons. Section 117 allows a constable to use force in their course of their duty. That's when they are doing their job. Such as making arrest or keeping the peace. Not removing people from a place who are not doing anything more than using a camera. Section 76 is about the use of force in self-defence. Which would be valid in resisting any force used by a constable to move someone from a place without lawful reason. Article 2 is about the abolition of the death penalty. Are you seriously using that to defend the use of force by a constable? R v Griffiths is about reasonable use of force. So if someone is not using force and not doing anything more than holding a camera then the use of any force would be unreasonable. What an utter failure in your argument. Try harder. Much much harder. You sound like a cop who has been told a few things about the law but hasn't actually read up on it.
@@mikeel6074 ...where do I start...I'm well aware...( pomposity)...to prevent a crime ( redundant)...broad spectrum (no shit)...probably be...(therefore probably not)...or something (like what something?)...courts to decide ( yes, that is what they do)...no failure ( egotism)...you fail ( more pomposity)...legalese (pretentious)...100s of years worth of case law (of which you quote none)...
What ever happened to people actually being able to engage in conversation without giving directives. Some years ago police would just ask if there is anything they could tell you about the station - especially about the memorials there to honour colleagues. Community policing has long gone.
Why do so many cops struggle to understand public accessibility laws. If they lack the cognitive ability to comprehended certain things they should be trained at least to ask for advice.
Usually they run their months and work everybody up until fist start flying, then they will go and stand behind the bigger blokes and cry that they are "afraid"
These videos are absolutely pointless unless you go through and put the complaints in and actually do it and show your subscribers evidence cos 99.99 % of “authors” don’t do follow ups they just want views an clicks
12:05 Nope. He needs to prove that it is NOT a public path. And he can't. Even if he brought up the title deeds, he wouldn't be able to prove that the no one is allowed to use the path. Because there are no signs telling people not to use it.
Hi Marti, I'm a huge fan, but Section 33 doesn't give you any right of access at all - it just defines a 'public place' specifically for the purpose of interpreting 1936 legislation - nothing else. It gives the public no rights at all. Luckily, all the sausages you encounter are too gormless to realise this, but I'm writing this because it's possible that one day one of them might, and they'd be correct! You're right of course about your implied right of access to open police land, but it can be removed by express instruction by someone it's reasonable to assume has authority to do so - not just by the landowner as your colleague says. Who such a person is isn't legally clear, I'd say definitely a Sgt though, and possibly a PC too. You have every right of course to dispute this removal to the person doing it, on the grounds of public transparency for example (and here because of you reasonably wanting to see the memorial chair, plus the signs being in your favour) - and the law does NOT require you to run away once some daft cop barks out an order - you have a reasonable time to question the order and then to leave. Very best wishes and thanks for your brilliant and so valuable work.
he's actually correct, we have the right to be on public land, and if section 33 defines what a public place is then it technically defines places we have the right to go, so yes according to section 33 he has the right to be on that land, marti is absolutely correct.
Section 16 of the Public Order Act 1986 is probably more relevant than the 1972 Criminal Justice Act... "“public place” means- (a) any highway, or in Scotland any road within the meaning of the M2Roads (Scotland) Act 1984, and (b) any place to which at the material time the public or any section of the public has access, on payment or otherwise, as of right or by virtue of express or implied permission;
@@25242824 Nope, its not public land, its private property, section 33 has nothing to do with it, it is an amendment to the 1936 POA section 9, that is worth a read, having pointed out to Marti several times that there is a section in there regarding private premises. " Private premises " means premises to which the public have access. (whether on payment or otherwise) only by permission of the owner, occupier, or lessee of the premises; But of course he ignores it, and anyway, is this an old vid as he is on a 5 year CBO banning him from police stations.
Hi Martin, police are seriously ignoring a criminal harassment saying it has to be reported and taken place in the last 6 months. This is over 500 unwanted awful emails, turning up at my home when removed any rights. Do you know my rights. Also police gave a opinion on a guarantor saying it wasn’t executed and wasn’t the guarantor because I never saw any tenancy agreements only the guarantor agreement. Any advice really appreciated X
Summary Offences do have a 6 month limit but depending on the circumstances (eg Domestic Abuse) it may be different. Perhaps you can submit some details by email. It may be worth a visit to the CAB for further advice (although they usually say go and see a solicitor!) < Mblagborough@gmail.com >
Any public land has nothing to do with anyone other than the members of public and that doesn't involve the police, so they should get off our property
Have ya ever done Gipton popo station? If not why not,yorrrr! They proper orrible. Thanks to them,I'm now 7,500 miles away in Cape Town. Everything I did or didn't do,they would grip me. Got to a stage of personal vendetta's on both sides. Except I didn't have mates with gun and helicopters.
Keep up the good work lads. Just be careful touching that parcel. Because if that prick would of seen you touching that. You know he'd have claimed you was taking it, then that's you locked up for a few hours, so remember that mate next time. Just the fck about being locked up for a few hours even though nothing would of come of it. It's just you've picked the parcel up. A was thinking when you picked it up Nooooo marti lad 😅😅😅😅
Only problem I have with more than one filmng is if your together you talk over each other even when there are more than one plod there and you talk to different plod you should have a camera person on the outside of the group so they can film at a distance so the plod pushing from different able when they push you and you show your body cam or hand held cam it looks deceiving so judges etc will side with plod more than members of public/ victim of abuse
Hi mate. Just after some advice if you can please mate. I was out doing my daily videos. I've not been auditing long. I was filming Middleton police station and went over to halfords they have a unit on a complex there. I spoke to a few business owners there at some unit's. When I was on my way out of the complex a member of staff engaged with me saying I'm not allowed to film on private property. I said I can film and the complex is publicly accessible. At which point he demanded I delete my videos. I said I'm not deleting any footage. So he got very aggressive he then grabbed my phone witch broke my gimbal and mic and took it into halfords with him. So I got the police they went and got my phone of them. But before the officer gave me my phone he went through it and then proceeded to delete my videos witch had evidence of the assault on me by halfords. I didn't get the officers numbers or the name of the one who assaulted me. I don't think that the police have the right to do that. What can I do. Have you any advice. Bye the way I watch your videos all the time. Love what you do. Could you please help me. My channel is lamsey laird audits. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks.
Initially, you'll need to get some details (evidence) as you've got a decent civil claim against Halfords for the damages to your property and the Police need a court order to delete your footage so there may be another claim there (HNK?). --Are there any CCTV cameras where you were accosted? Find out who owns it and make a request. -Find out who the 2 cops are, get their numbers and put in a request for the Police's bodycams . -Deleted footage can be recovered-have you asked anybody who knows how to do this (Marti may know)? Get in touch, you were treated abysmally-there is no way anyone should have to put up with that level of abuse. < Mblagborough@gmail.com >
If police were called, there will be an incident number a CAD. There will be a record of who was sent to the incident. From that you can get the details etc. As BB says Halfords will definitely have CCTV, put in a request, along with a report to the police for assault and potential robbery, taking your property. Good luck. As BB also said any footage on your phone can be recovered. Someone will help you.
You should get a guardian app for your phone which prevents police access, watch Auditing Britains latest 3 parter, the police couldnt operate his phone and continued recording into the police station even after being siezed
No tyrants station is private ..paid by tax payers..thats a cop god help us all ..as usual marti ..good vid ..why do you call him chunky monkey ..👍👍👍👍👍
Just because it's funded by taxes does not make it open for the public to walk around at leisure. Although where Marti was in this video looked like a public area, to me.
Marti youve been shadow banned on my end, havent been offered any of your content in a long time and had to search to see what was up, but will be catching up. How is live free? Any word on him?
The police station is paid for by the public and the only private areas are those marked restricted or police personnel only. Why should we pay for buildings we cannot monitor! Why do they need all that grassland which could be utilised for the homeless etc. This is not a place for entertaining and e have to pay the upkeep of that wasted land!
12:43 😂😂😂 quieter bobby-‘have you got a crime to report?’ .. chunky-‘yeah actually, I’m being harassed’ .. more mouthy expressive bobby-‘harassment by who?’ Chunky-‘yourself..’ 😂😂😂😂
![Wiz Khalifa - Khalifa's Home [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnrLCTe0Nz4/mqdefault.jpg)
It's a pity they don't apply the same level of determination, commitment, drive, enthusiasm and perseverance to upholding the law as they do to protecting their fragile egos.
It’s amazing the effort they put into subverting your rights instead of taking the much simpler one step approach of just respecting your rights.
'' Why would you wish to use force on peaceful members of the public ?''
That was well said Marti.
Is this marti.
14:14 - Get back inside son, yer' dinners ready.
@lamseyaudits no pal @TheBrawlBox is channel admin, so does show up with my name, but when you click on the message, it should say on behalf of the channel.
They don’t however they are on property of which implied right an access as be declined meaning they can be removed ….
This tiny insignificant dump and it’s equally inept staff embarrassed themselves a year or two back. You’d think they’d have learnt from that experience. 🙄
Hey .... it's Plod, whatcha gonna do?
What’s happen to ‘To Plod or not To Plod’ (the auditor) ? 🤔@@colinpryor4290
The first thing they do is threaten violence. 😢despicable behaviour by our protectors..
No longer our protectors,sad but true
This is another example of why there is such a disconnect between police and the public.
@tintersniffer9929 they are not our protectors they are our persecutors
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent". - Isaac Asimov.
How can police keep stating that government owned property is private, how can they claim it’s private when the public pay their wages and pay for the public property. So you can be there if you have business but not if you need help
Just watched Yardley Ski and some degenerate officers at SY Police. I genuinely think laws should be passed to discourage inbreeding.
Question.
Is that breeding between herds?
Little thing that bug's me about the Police is seeing standing around with their hands in their pockets and chewing gum. Would be nice if I heard you say something about it
Ah Jacob the numpty copper who arrested me for assaulting him 10:11
Jacob the chipolata
@@MartiBlagboroughor corrupt tosser will do
Jacob said he'd knock fcuk out of you if you put camera down next time.
and then realise that the rubbish they are talking is being filmed. Big back off.
This was NEVER about it being private property, it was all about some people seeing something they didn't like and then abusing their power by ordering people to do what they say. They could have just ignored you and gone about their day and you would have left, but instead they take ANY chance to not do their actual job and instead abuse their power.
If the public are allowed to be there to make complaint to the Plod, then it is a publicly accessible space and anyone can be there for other reasons. Marti, have you considered doing a silent audit?
@@colinpryor4290 I feel confused so I apologise in advance. You didn't think im Marti right? I'm not the guy who did the video in case thats what you were thinking. Apologies if im a dumbdumb ;)
@@UncleMarty I read your post and thought "What the ..." then I saw your handle... LOL. What are the chances?
@@colinpryor4290 Hah I figured as much, easy mistake to make brother :)
The power of being butt hurt
if it is funded by the taxpayer then it is public property, even if it is a private premises that the police or government are renting, the second it becomes tax payer funded it becomes public, there is no trespass from a police station because it's public, every time the police eject or remove someone from police premises without an actual crime being committed they are the ones breaking the law, they can't just tell you you're trespassing on public property and use force.
Last year the York Press posted a report about some guy who was fined heavily for refusing to leave the grounds of the police head quarters in Northallerton. His companion, who must have previous convictions, received a custodial sentence.
That may be the case somewhere like the USA but you are totally wrong when it comes to the UK.
@@bertblaser you're the one talking utter nonsense.
So by that logic then you can walk in to a army base or right in to open prison because they are tax payer funded .
@@kierankinder9944 yes, because army bases have public areas and public access muppet, I know because I spent 13 years working at them
There was me thinking I was too dumb to join the police force, they employ them.
They never ever learn,their ego's are always going to get in the way.
One of my local cop shops. All corrupt as owt. Well done Marti 👌
11:20 Making up laws on the fly. Standard police procedure. The Criminal Law Act of 1977 does cover some trespass issues. But not at a police station. Only residential, embassies, with weapons or using violence. And reasonable force is never allowed to be used immediately unless the situation requires it to be used to protect persons or property.
@@mikeel6074 You didn't read the legislation properly. Section 3 of the 1967 act is about the use of force to make an arrest. Not to remove someone from someplace. The 1977 act covers trespass. But in specific places. And with weapons.
Section 117 allows a constable to use force in their course of their duty. That's when they are doing their job. Such as making arrest or keeping the peace. Not removing people from a place who are not doing anything more than using a camera.
Section 76 is about the use of force in self-defence. Which would be valid in resisting any force used by a constable to move someone from a place without lawful reason.
Article 2 is about the abolition of the death penalty. Are you seriously using that to defend the use of force by a constable?
R v Griffiths is about reasonable use of force. So if someone is not using force and not doing anything more than holding a camera then the use of any force would be unreasonable.
What an utter failure in your argument. Try harder. Much much harder. You sound like a cop who has been told a few things about the law but hasn't actually read up on it.
@@mikeel6074 ...where do I start...I'm well aware...( pomposity)...to prevent a crime ( redundant)...broad spectrum (no shit)...probably be...(therefore probably not)...or something (like what something?)...courts to decide ( yes, that is what they do)...no failure ( egotism)...you fail ( more pomposity)...legalese (pretentious)...100s of years worth of case law (of which you quote none)...
@@mikeel6074 A whole bunch of words with no consistent argument and contradicting yourself. You haven't even tried.
They thought you were nicking their truffles.
He's a real ladder climber that one.
What ever happened to people actually being able to engage in conversation without giving directives. Some years ago police would just ask if there is anything they could tell you about the station - especially about the memorials there to honour colleagues. Community policing has long gone.
True but it’s them and us now and I bet you can’t guess who comes first 😂😂😂 😂😂😂 I
The cops couldn't solve an escape room these days !😂🎉
Why do so many cops struggle to understand public accessibility laws. If they lack the cognitive ability to comprehended certain things they should be trained at least to ask for advice.
Love it last of the summer audits!
It's crazy how little the Police know about laws
Pair of absolute FANNYS
What is a four foot tall woman cop going to do?
R2D2 or droid.
Usually they run their months and work everybody up until fist start flying, then they will go and stand behind the bigger blokes and cry that they are "afraid"
@@andiehyde3714in a nutshell
@@andiehyde3714little mice till they get big plods out than they get mouthiest 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I wonder which part of police duties includes threatening violence for not acceding to a request.
These videos are absolutely pointless unless you go through and put the complaints in and actually do it and show your subscribers evidence cos 99.99 % of “authors” don’t do follow ups they just want views an clicks
2:20 That means PC was only 7 years old then...
Served for 7 years
@@John-lp5xh true didn't think of that 😂
They lie so easily
"The People Police the Police" Sir Robert Peel 1829😎
Another case of police bullying.
They really need to smarten up their appearances also.
In memory of the dim witted clowns in uniform that made prive plonkers of themselves on this day in history.
Great to see Chunky out and about. Well done lads.
great stuff better that the tel lie vision
That tree is dead 😮,it looks like no one looked after it when it was first planted 😮
People are still masking up like that?
Old vid.
You don’t have to be thick to be a copper there but it does help. Two schooled boys.
Marti B ran rings around these guys. If only people knew when they were out of their league.
I bet the station cat knows the law better than those cops. Or any other cop.🐱
Poor cats not going to get its food because they use the rear entrance .😮😢
P private property, that’s paid by tax payers
Why are they wearing face nappies
12:05 Nope. He needs to prove that it is NOT a public path. And he can't. Even if he brought up the title deeds, he wouldn't be able to prove that the no one is allowed to use the path. Because there are no signs telling people not to use it.
I thought chunky monkey was retired
No he's just chilling been even more chunky and a cheeky monkey
Old video reuploaded i think
deja vu. seen this before
This was one of Auditing Yorkshire's 1st wasn't is. When he almost flew his drone into the tree lol 👍
The path doesn't say it's private either its just a path 😂
Recycling ♻️
I'm sure I've seen this before.
Loved it lad
What's this? Last of the summer Swine?
Christ, this is old
Is a Crown Servant an agent of the police?
Hi Marti, I'm a huge fan, but Section 33 doesn't give you any right of access at all - it just defines a 'public place' specifically for the purpose of interpreting 1936 legislation - nothing else. It gives the public no rights at all.
Luckily, all the sausages you encounter are too gormless to realise this, but I'm writing this because it's possible that one day one of them might, and they'd be correct!
You're right of course about your implied right of access to open police land, but it can be removed by express instruction by someone it's reasonable to assume has authority to do so - not just by the landowner as your colleague says. Who such a person is isn't legally clear, I'd say definitely a Sgt though, and possibly a PC too. You have every right of course to dispute this removal to the person doing it, on the grounds of public transparency for example (and here because of you reasonably wanting to see the memorial chair, plus the signs being in your favour) - and the law does NOT require you to run away once some daft cop barks out an order - you have a reasonable time to question the order and then to leave.
Very best wishes and thanks for your brilliant and so valuable work.
he's actually correct, we have the right to be on public land, and if section 33 defines what a public place is then it technically defines places we have the right to go, so yes according to section 33 he has the right to be on that land, marti is absolutely correct.
Section 16 of the Public Order Act 1986 is probably more relevant than the 1972 Criminal Justice Act...
"“public place” means-
(a) any highway, or in Scotland any road within the meaning of the M2Roads (Scotland) Act 1984, and
(b) any place to which at the material time the public or any section of the public has access, on payment or otherwise, as of right or by virtue of express or implied permission;
Section 33 works just fine
@@25242824 Nope, its not public land, its private property, section 33 has nothing to do with it, it is an amendment to the 1936 POA section 9, that is worth a read, having pointed out to Marti several times that there is a section in there regarding private premises.
" Private premises " means premises to which the public have access. (whether on payment or otherwise) only by permission of the owner, occupier, or lessee of the premises;
But of course he ignores it, and anyway, is this an old vid as he is on a 5 year CBO banning him from police stations.
I wonder how they act without their uniforms on.
Is live free out or back in action marti?? Miss all ya’s together doing the vids
Why do they keep saying it's private property when we bloody pay for it?????
Private property paid for by whom? 🤔
Yorkshire police 🥴
@@paulholland5270 And who pays for Yorkshire police? Taxpayers
my ears cannot pick up any noise from face knickers
Mine neither and I dont mind telling them. But prefer face nappy for the psychological win.
They will teach that 🐱to sniff out AUDITORS. ..thats annoying ..🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You totally bossed that situation.
Plod didn't stand a chance 😂.
Yeah the little sticker on unmarked but on call nurses and council workers have them too
Thank you for keeping an eye on the police 😉 👏 👏 👏 👍
Good to see you with chunky monkey again
this is old footage.
Hi Martin, police are seriously ignoring a criminal harassment saying it has to be reported and taken place in the last 6 months. This is over 500 unwanted awful emails, turning up at my home when removed any rights. Do you know my rights. Also police gave a opinion on a guarantor saying it wasn’t executed and wasn’t the guarantor because I never saw any tenancy agreements only the guarantor agreement. Any advice really appreciated X
Summary Offences do have a 6 month limit but depending on the circumstances (eg Domestic Abuse) it may be different.
Perhaps you can submit some details by email. It may be worth a visit to the CAB for further advice (although they usually say go and see a solicitor!)
< Mblagborough@gmail.com >
If there is a footpath on the property then u can use it....
Any public land has nothing to do with anyone other than the members of public and that doesn't involve the police, so they should get off our property
Brilliant audit lads ... P.I.N.A.C 🤜 💥💥💥
AA 👊
Control freaks not used to being told no lol
Have ya ever done Gipton popo station?
If not why not,yorrrr!
They proper orrible.
Thanks to them,I'm now 7,500 miles away in Cape Town.
Everything I did or didn't do,they would grip me.
Got to a stage of personal vendetta's on both sides.
Except I didn't have mates with gun and helicopters.
Who is the young lady with you marti 🤔
When i first saw the video it looked like a gane fir the thinmbnail
Keep up the good work lads. Just be careful touching that parcel. Because if that prick would of seen you touching that. You know he'd have claimed you was taking it, then that's you locked up for a few hours, so remember that mate next time. Just the fck about being locked up for a few hours even though nothing would of come of it. It's just you've picked the parcel up. A was thinking when you picked it up Nooooo marti lad 😅😅😅😅
👍😐👍
Only problem I have with more than one filmng is if your together you talk over each other even when there are more than one plod there and you talk to different plod you should have a camera person on the outside of the group so they can film at a distance so the plod pushing from different able when they push you and you show your body cam or hand held cam it looks deceiving so judges etc will side with plod more than members of public/ victim of abuse
What was the speed limit on the access road? 5 Miles per hour?
No idea
The Good the bad and the Ugly.
Is this a re-upload Marti ?
Marty what’s with the reloads and how is chunky monkey ?
Hi mate. Just after some advice if you can please mate. I was out doing my daily videos. I've not been auditing long. I was filming Middleton police station and went over to halfords they have a unit on a complex there. I spoke to a few business owners there at some unit's. When I was on my way out of the complex a member of staff engaged with me saying I'm not allowed to film on private property. I said I can film and the complex is publicly accessible. At which point he demanded I delete my videos. I said I'm not deleting any footage. So he got very aggressive he then grabbed my phone witch broke my gimbal and mic and took it into halfords with him. So I got the police they went and got my phone of them. But before the officer gave me my phone he went through it and then proceeded to delete my videos witch had evidence of the assault on me by halfords. I didn't get the officers numbers or the name of the one who assaulted me. I don't think that the police have the right to do that. What can I do. Have you any advice. Bye the way I watch your videos all the time. Love what you do. Could you please help me. My channel is lamsey laird audits. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks.
That's why multiple cameras are required. Talk to a solicitor.
Initially, you'll need to get some details (evidence) as you've got a decent civil claim against Halfords for the damages to your property and the Police need a court order to delete your footage so there may be another claim there (HNK?).
--Are there any CCTV cameras where you were accosted? Find out who owns it and make a request.
-Find out who the 2 cops are, get their numbers and put in a request for the Police's bodycams .
-Deleted footage can be recovered-have you asked anybody who knows how to do this (Marti may know)?
Get in touch, you were treated abysmally-there is no way anyone should have to put up with that level of abuse.
< Mblagborough@gmail.com >
If police were called, there will be an incident number a CAD. There will be a record of who was sent to the incident. From that you can get the details etc. As BB says Halfords will definitely have CCTV, put in a request, along with a report to the police for assault and potential robbery, taking your property. Good luck. As BB also said any footage on your phone can be recovered. Someone will help you.
Make a request for body cams and footage from Halford (find out who is the data handler for halfords)
If you can get them it will help HNK .
You should get a guardian app for your phone which prevents police access, watch Auditing Britains latest 3 parter, the police couldnt operate his phone and continued recording into the police station even after being siezed
Why are the bed wetters wearing face nappies ?
I live not far from there and that path leads to the public swimming pool.
Ey-up
Re-Upload!..
The first E is silent so mcneaney
Wooden tops need retraining
No tyrants station is private ..paid by tax payers..thats a cop god help us all ..as usual marti ..good vid ..why do you call him chunky monkey ..👍👍👍👍👍
PRIVATE PROPERTY? CROWN PROPERTY IS FINANCED BY TAXES!
Just because it's funded by taxes does not make it open for the public to walk around at leisure.
Although where Marti was in this video looked like a public area, to me.
All that copper bullshite and in the end he walked off...
Ignore the authorised only BS... they are NOT AUTHORISED PERIOD!
Marti youve been shadow banned on my end, havent been offered any of your content in a long time and had to search to see what was up, but will be catching up. How is live free? Any word on him?
You doing a uk meet the tyrants video, repeat repeat and repeat
Numpties !!😅😂😅
PC sue mc en eeeeney very common name in NI
The police station is paid for by the public and the only private areas are those marked restricted or police personnel only. Why should we pay for buildings we cannot monitor! Why do they need all that grassland which could be utilised for the homeless etc. This is not a place for entertaining and e have to pay the upkeep of that wasted land!
Very professional of the bearded officer - not. Note how his colleague sidled away from him. Can't say I blame him.
Hey Guy's next time you visit ask for PC Oscar and take him a cat treat
This video was sponsored by Marsdens
12:43 😂😂😂 quieter bobby-‘have you got a crime to report?’ .. chunky-‘yeah actually, I’m being harassed’ .. more mouthy expressive bobby-‘harassment by who?’ Chunky-‘yourself..’ 😂😂😂😂
Harrassing cops.
When did police stations become PRIVATE property?