As an aviation enthusiast I am a huge fan of the 787 and really love what AAL did with the business class suites. One of the biggest complaints I hear about business class is that there is not enough room to do work either on a laptop or other methods. The extended tray design is amazing and one of the best features of any business class seat on any airplane.
I flew on a Boeing 787 for the first time last week on Air Europa to Madrid...and I must say, most impressive airplane I have ever flown in. Truly amazing.
When the 777 was first introduced, we got similar images of a large, comfortable economy class, but the truth is that most airlines will never use the 3-3-3 seat configuration, as it is not economically viable. What most economy class passengers will get, is a cramped 3-4-3 cabin. That is exactly what happened to the 777.
Marc Liljeqvist pretty soon it is going to be standing room only, recently airline changed the seat distance from 35 inches to 33, people demand low prices and that is how they get it.
+Marc Liljeqvist AA's 787 actually has a 3-3-3 configuration, however the plane is much narrower than the 777, the 787 was designed to accommodate 8 abreast and not 9. Shame on AA for choosing such a narrow seat. 17" width for a long haul seat is Torture, no matter how nice the aircraft itself is.
+André Garcia First of all, the 787 was designed from the ground up to accommodate 9 abreast seating. Second, the 777 was designed from the ground up to accommodate 9 abreast seating. Back when the 777 was designed, seats were a standard 18"-19" wide. As new, slim line, narrow seat designs came about and got selected, aircraft were re-designed for them to improve profitability for the carriers. The airlines make the decisions on how they want their seats to be laid out and what type of seats to use. Currently, the new 777s are coming in mostly with 3-4-3 economy layouts, but some airlines are still using 3-3-3. Almost all 787s are 3-3-3, but the Japanese carriers chose 2-4-2. Current and future 737s and A320 series are available with 17" seats as well. Some carriers are contemplating on ordering the updated A380neo with 3-5-3 seating on the main deck, also possible with 17" seats, but Airbus is for now defending 18" seat minimums. The A350 was designed as 3-3-3 with 18" seats. It isn't wide enough to fit 3-4-3, even with 17" seats.
+harris3693 NOTHING like the MD-80 seating AT ALL. MD-80s were designed for 5 abreast seating at 18" or more width (depending on width of aisle.) They were designed in the 1960s as DC-9.
It was a great honor to provide technical/ commercial on-site support as Boeing. I had the opportunity twice to support this airline as Boeing. 2001-2006 and again 2016-2021.
Krishantha Kumaranatunga I think it's more to make the point that customers who were thinking of switching to United in order to more regularly fly 787s don't need to, because American has them too.
All of our customers planes are custom made to how they want them from Boeing. From the lights, colors, features, electronics, seats, seat configuration, seat material, etc.
@@cplays4342 this was the actual plane I flew out to Spain on and back. I went there once to see my aunt and that was the exact 787 I flew on and it was amazing.
The captain said he flew a 757 and a 767 and he said that when he came on the plane to the cockpit he said it skipped a generation well maybe he should have flown the 777 am I right
I came home from Chicago on one of these today. The tinting windows and color lighting are impressive. The tv in the seat is cool with tons of recent movies and interactive flight graphics ...and I was in the cheap seats. Still, at 6'3", my knees were mushed into the seat in front of me and my shoulder sticks out into the aisle and gets bumped constantly. I honestly have more leg room on their tiny regional jets and S80s :( The 787 is a very nice airplane with nice features but they again crammed too darn many seats into it. I'll pass next time.
Michael T uhh, what the heck are you talking about??? im 6'5" and I flew on a 787 from DFW-ORD about 2 weeks ago and I still had least 4 inches of leg room left ( in economy, by the way). and you also CLEARLY have never been on a regional jet, because they have absolutely zero leg room. Btw, 226 seats on a 787-8 is not crammed at all. All Nippon Airways puts 335 seats on their 787-8`s, so yeah.
+Elitewarrior007 I fly all over the country every month. I hopped off a Bombardier regional jet from GRB to ORD just 45min before getting on the Dreamliner and I truly had more knee room on the smaller plane. No headroom, no shoulder room ...but more legroom. The S80 and MD80 are also cramped but I truly have more room for my legs than the 787 offers. Perhaps your 6'5 is from the waist up, I haven't seen 4" of legroom in coach since 2005. I like the plane and the tech is unreal but it is what it is.
Michael T Agree, even passengers on Thai, Qatar, Scoot and other Dreamliner operators complain for super cramped seats unless if you're able to fly First or Business Class. Previously My Aunt tried out ANA's 787 economy class from HND to SIN. Later she told me that she couldn't bear any longer flights after enduring 6 hours of sleepless, shoulder pain and numb foot. By the way, she is only 5'8 tall with slim waist and does not have any issue with smaller aircraft other than 787. Personally, the Dreamliner was one of my favorite too but the cabin comfort was a major letdown.
That pilot knows 41,000 feet is a normal cruising altitude. That's not "higher." Most modern aircrafts can go up to 41,000 feet, including the 767 that he talked about.
+harris3693 The Concorde was useless. It was a great feat of engineering, but the damn thing burned fuel like it was going out of style. The CO2 and noise pollution was also terrible. The cost of operating was very high. These are things airlines and passengers just don't want to deal with. There is a reason airlines and the airline industry are looking for lower CO2 pollution, greater fuel efficiency, less noise, greater ranger, and a lower cost of operating. The Concorde offers none of these things.
+harris3693 When was the Concorde price the same as sonic flight? The BA and AF flights from JFK were always much more expensive. Also, while there was a lot of cache on those flights, there was little luxury on them. The interior cabin was as big as an Embraer 190 series with seats about as big as well and no WiFi or any inflight entertainment. The big luxury was time savings. On the trips from Europe to JFK you actually arrived earlier than you departed, so it was also time travel to a degree.
+harris3693 There's actually a lot of proof. The fuel consumption and regular scheduled maintenance intervals are all much more economic than the 767 and A330 they replace. There are also large savings in on-board diagnostics and the way the systems are set-up modularly. A technician simply has to get a read out of what's faulty, remove it and pack into a FedEx box back to Boeing. Then go to the warehouse and pull out the spare part and plug it back in. This was in part introduced on the C-17 in the military and it's a huge man hour savings and retains aircraft readiness.
the irony is Air India,American,United still are 3 star airlines with average service and yet amazing planes like 787s in their fleet. Air India fan to be here
The longer the aircraft will be in the air the lower it will fly. Doing trans Atlantic flights is usually around 32K feet while a one hour regional flight would go up to 40,000 feet.
+The_Communist_ Texan Wow... you got that completely the opposite. The longer the flight, the higher the altitude. Why? The benefit of high altitude is less air resistance, which allows for better fuel economy and extended range during long flights. The lower the altitude, the more fuel you use to fly. Turbofan engines are most effective at high altitudes. When you don't have far to go, spending time to climb to high altitude and then to descend is useless. It is just faster and simpler to stay at 25k-33k feet. That's efficient enough and makes it easier to get back down. When you're flying long-distance, you may as well climb as high as you can go and burn less fuel, making more profit or enabling the aircraft to fly to a farther destination. I just came back from a round trip flight from New York to Stockholm/Copenhagen on a 787-8 and we cruised at 41,000ft on the way to Stockholm and at 38,000 on the way to New York. The typical 737/A320 flight within the US cruises at 30,000 to 32,000.
Hey AA, a question: so how is a pretty aircraft with fancy interior lighting relevant when it doesn't take off or land on time? How is that self-tinting fancy window a good thing when it's caked with face grease from the kids on the last 10 flights and you haven't cleaned it? Asking for a friend....
I was recently on a last generation 787. It was very similar with the over head bins and cool lightning but it didn't have the shaded windows. The television screens were similar with AC adapters but were not the same.
I "love" how they selected a window seat that aligned nicely with the window to show off it's features ..., why not show off one of those awkwardly positioned window seats where the window is either behind your shoulder or nearly right by the backrest of the seat in front of you ...,
+Niklas Enblom You can fly Norwegian meanwhile. I just flew them from New York to Arlanda and then Copenhagen back to New York. They are actually pretty good... by that I mean fairly standard. Not any worse than SAS I think. I did find that the air pressurization in the 787 was better than average though. I have to swallow air 5 or more times during ascent and descent usually and I didn't have to swallow air at all at ascent to 40,000 feet, while just 2 times during descent this time around, so I'm very happy.
What Boeing needs is to transform their dreamliners into solid oxide - fuel cell aircraft. Once that is done, the range would literally be doubled. Hydrogen field cell aircraft can be done with smaller aircraft with shorter distances- and prices that reflect their carbon footprint. - the issue is you have to make it worthwhile for someone to take that versus a regular aircraft or flight
@3:11 How could he become a Check Pilot for the 787 so soon, its still such a new plane. I don't know how he would get enough flight hours to become a check pilot for that plane. Even just getting enough hours to become a captain for 787 is still tough.
Way cool! Maybe American Airlines would be interested in custom manhole covers with American Airlines lettered around the Wassenfels Museum center image.
Those windows are cool but I'd prefer it they just had a clear and a dark option. Some idiots are going to keep them half dark all the time so the cabin won't be dark for sleeping.
very nice. configuration of 3-3-3 instead of the 2-5-2 like our former DC-10 standard or AFS DC-10 Transcon......very kool for cabin crews to serve and not stretch there arms toward the passengers . Job well done American
By the way, on a 2-5-2 layout, only a single row of passengers is two seats away from the aisle. With 3-3-3 seating, there are two rows of passengers who are two seats away from the aisle, so in fact, flight attendants reach more in the 787.
AA never had the 717, so Mr. Fernandez was slightly incorrect. I'm guessing that he considers the 717 as part of AA since TWA had a few...which AA promptly discarded, lol.
Lovely..but one must exercise extreme care when docking the areobridge to the 787 fuselage.Because of the fragile nature of the composite material a 5 centimetre gap must remain between the aircraft and bridge.Hard contact will result in composite denting and 'popping'..the surface pops back into shape like when a plastic bottle is compressed. However,internal damage may result.Unlike other metal skins like the 747 the 787 is a lot more 'sensitive' rather than weak.
+Teva Bruce As opposed to thin metal skin, which will also dent, but will not "pop" back into its shape? By the way, composite materials are harder than metals. Just try bending a composite bicycle or tennis racquet.
When the lady explains the luggage box, i noticed the voice in the back... It is the same male voice of the chicago trains announcer? Just curious. ...
As an aviation enthusiast I am a huge fan of the 787 and really love what AAL did with the business class suites. One of the biggest complaints I hear about business class is that there is not enough room to do work either on a laptop or other methods. The extended tray design is amazing and one of the best features of any business class seat on any airplane.
I flew on a Boeing 787 for the first time last week on Air Europa to Madrid...and I must say, most impressive airplane I have ever flown in. Truly amazing.
Hey hello
"Welcome aboard American Airlines" never gets old
Insert the metal fitting into the buckle, then pull on the loose end to tighten. To release, lift the top portion of the buckle. click
When the 777 was first introduced, we got similar images of a large, comfortable economy class, but the truth is that most airlines will never use the 3-3-3 seat configuration, as it is not economically viable. What most economy class passengers will get, is a cramped 3-4-3 cabin. That is exactly what happened to the 777.
But most airlines use the 3-3-3 configuration. It's more popular and convenient.
Marc Liljeqvist pretty soon it is going to be standing room only, recently airline changed the seat distance from 35 inches to 33, people demand low prices and that is how they get it.
+Marc Liljeqvist AA's 787 actually has a 3-3-3 configuration, however the plane is much narrower than the 777, the 787 was designed to accommodate 8 abreast and not 9. Shame on AA for choosing such a narrow seat. 17" width for a long haul seat is Torture, no matter how nice the aircraft itself is.
+André Garcia First of all, the 787 was designed from the ground up to accommodate 9 abreast seating. Second, the 777 was designed from the ground up to accommodate 9 abreast seating. Back when the 777 was designed, seats were a standard 18"-19" wide. As new, slim line, narrow seat designs came about and got selected, aircraft were re-designed for them to improve profitability for the carriers.
The airlines make the decisions on how they want their seats to be laid out and what type of seats to use. Currently, the new 777s are coming in mostly with 3-4-3 economy layouts, but some airlines are still using 3-3-3. Almost all 787s are 3-3-3, but the Japanese carriers chose 2-4-2. Current and future 737s and A320 series are available with 17" seats as well. Some carriers are contemplating on ordering the updated A380neo with 3-5-3 seating on the main deck, also possible with 17" seats, but Airbus is for now defending 18" seat minimums. The A350 was designed as 3-3-3 with 18" seats. It isn't wide enough to fit 3-4-3, even with 17" seats.
+harris3693 NOTHING like the MD-80 seating AT ALL.
MD-80s were designed for 5 abreast seating at 18" or more width (depending on width of aisle.) They were designed in the 1960s as DC-9.
I love BOTH the Boeing 787 Dreamliner and the Airbus A350 XWB -- they are both awesomeness!!!
Same :)
We as passengers benefit from this technological competitiveness
It was a great honor to provide technical/ commercial on-site support as Boeing. I had the opportunity twice to support this airline as Boeing. 2001-2006 and again 2016-2021.
50 shades of grey window lol
+Hugo van spaandonk If they haven't got the movie, you still won't miss it.
😜
W
Hugo van spaandonk you made my night
American Airlines is showing us extra 787 features like its ONLY on their planes...ITS NOT ;-;
Krishantha Kumaranatunga I think it's more to make the point that customers who were thinking of switching to United in order to more regularly fly 787s don't need to, because American has them too.
Krishantha Kumaranatunga So what? They are proud of their plane.
stereopolice exactly!
All of our customers planes are custom made to how they want them from Boeing. From the lights, colors, features, electronics, seats, seat configuration, seat material, etc.
+Krishantha Kumaranatunga Not on Delta it isn't.
“touch tone” shades? 😂 sign me up!
@Alexandra Meko Who even asked? No one!
@@cplays4342 this was the actual plane I flew out to Spain on and back. I went there once to see my aunt and that was the exact 787 I flew on and it was amazing.
@@DemonSister6 Okay... why are you replying to me on a 4 year old comment exactly? Not trying to sound rude.
"We don't have no longer shades"....wow
well...they are touch tone.
"even dough"
lol i love how you mock, i wanna see you do a presentation among multiple national channels and see if you dont stumble a word
LOL
Yo, this is a great feature for the new window.
1:05 I went on this suite. It was gorgeous. It had games and a gamepad to play the games. Movies. An adjustable chair. Yeah. Perfection.
The captain said he flew a 757 and a 767 and he said that when he came on the plane to the cockpit he said it skipped a generation well maybe he should have flown the 777 am I right
Thats what simulators exist
Ysa
StarSound b
Ago
Baby
I came home from Chicago on one of these today. The tinting windows and color lighting are impressive. The tv in the seat is cool with tons of recent movies and interactive flight graphics ...and I was in the cheap seats.
Still, at 6'3", my knees were mushed into the seat in front of me and my shoulder sticks out into the aisle and gets bumped constantly. I honestly have more leg room on their tiny regional jets and S80s :(
The 787 is a very nice airplane with nice features but they again crammed too darn many seats into it. I'll pass next time.
Michael T uhh, what the heck are you talking about??? im 6'5" and I flew on a 787 from DFW-ORD about 2 weeks ago and I still had least 4 inches of leg room left ( in economy, by the way). and you also CLEARLY have never been on a regional jet, because they have absolutely zero leg room.
Btw, 226 seats on a 787-8 is not crammed at all. All Nippon Airways puts 335 seats on their 787-8`s, so yeah.
+Elitewarrior007 I fly all over the country every month. I hopped off a Bombardier regional jet from GRB to ORD just 45min before getting on the Dreamliner and I truly had more knee room on the smaller plane. No headroom, no shoulder room ...but more legroom.
The S80 and MD80 are also cramped but I truly have more room for my legs than the 787 offers. Perhaps your 6'5 is from the waist up, I haven't seen 4" of legroom in coach since 2005.
I like the plane and the tech is unreal but it is what it is.
Michael T Agree, even passengers on Thai, Qatar, Scoot and other Dreamliner operators complain for super cramped seats unless if you're able to fly First or Business Class. Previously My Aunt tried out ANA's 787 economy class from HND to SIN. Later she told me that she couldn't bear any longer flights after enduring 6 hours of sleepless, shoulder pain and numb foot. By the way, she is only 5'8 tall with slim waist and does not have any issue with smaller aircraft other than 787. Personally, the Dreamliner was one of my favorite too but the cabin comfort was a major letdown.
Chris58851
EliteWarrior007 335 seats in ANA 787-8 ? Are you sure you're actually flying? LOL
Well, if it's dark, no lighting will come in
yes
Stop being jealous
Im not jeolus
I've been on this plane go check it out on my channel
Twitch Sxllxd lmao he’s not talking to you
This is the first useful news report I’ve ever seen
LOL there was a 1 minute, no-skip, Emirates ad just before this video played!
I love the fact that It still has in flight entertainment screens!
Boarding this baby tomorrow! The excitement is real 😍
I’m going to fly on one of these in a few months, can’t wait!!
I was recently a passenger on this plane coming from Cancun to Dallas. Beautiful aircraft.
That pilot knows 41,000 feet is a normal cruising altitude. That's not "higher." Most modern aircrafts can go up to 41,000 feet, including the 767 that he talked about.
Boeing: you won't get a better plane than the Dreamliner
A350: Hold my beer
Why are you comparing the a350 to the 787?😂
The plane is like futuristic!! I've never EVER been to B787 but I've seen it! I just wanted to ride with it....
I’ve been on 2 Boeing 787-8’s on American Airlines
The 787 is just an amazing pice of engineering art...
+harris3693 I agree, it needs to be brought back.
+harris3693 The Concorde was useless. It was a great feat of engineering, but the damn thing burned fuel like it was going out of style. The CO2 and noise pollution was also terrible. The cost of operating was very high. These are things airlines and passengers just don't want to deal with. There is a reason airlines and the airline industry are looking for lower CO2 pollution, greater fuel efficiency, less noise, greater ranger, and a lower cost of operating. The Concorde offers none of these things.
+harris3693 When was the Concorde price the same as sonic flight? The BA and AF flights from JFK were always much more expensive. Also, while there was a lot of cache on those flights, there was little luxury on them. The interior cabin was as big as an Embraer 190 series with seats about as big as well and no WiFi or any inflight entertainment. The big luxury was time savings. On the trips from Europe to JFK you actually arrived earlier than you departed, so it was also time travel to a degree.
+harris3693 There's actually a lot of proof. The fuel consumption and regular scheduled maintenance intervals are all much more economic than the 767 and A330 they replace. There are also large savings in on-board diagnostics and the way the systems are set-up modularly. A technician simply has to get a read out of what's faulty, remove it and pack into a FedEx box back to Boeing. Then go to the warehouse and pull out the spare part and plug it back in. This was in part introduced on the C-17 in the military and it's a huge man hour savings and retains aircraft readiness.
+George Lurye Just another way 2 fix the plane. It`s gonna take some1 that noes what hes doing or I don`t care how user friendly the plane is.
the irony is Air India,American,United still are 3 star airlines with average service and yet amazing planes like 787s in their fleet.
Air India fan to be here
"I flew the 757 and the 767 and this skipped a generation!" uh well yeah because you actually skipped the 777. 757 and 67 are very old planes
Go American Airlines and the awesome 787 with those tech smart window shades and everything else that makes it so Great. Yes!
Flying at 41000 feet Is revolutionary? Maybe for American Airlines but most other airlines have been doing that for a long time lol
+alan jackson Most still fly at ~30,000ft regularly, they are referring to this being capable of sustaining speed at 41,000ft for a 2+ hour trip.
***** Oh.
The longer the aircraft will be in the air the lower it will fly. Doing trans Atlantic flights is usually around 32K feet while a one hour regional flight would go up to 40,000 feet.
+The_Communist_ Texan Wow... you got that completely the opposite.
The longer the flight, the higher the altitude. Why? The benefit of high altitude is less air resistance, which allows for better fuel economy and extended range during long flights. The lower the altitude, the more fuel you use to fly. Turbofan engines are most effective at high altitudes.
When you don't have far to go, spending time to climb to high altitude and then to descend is useless. It is just faster and simpler to stay at 25k-33k feet. That's efficient enough and makes it easier to get back down. When you're flying long-distance, you may as well climb as high as you can go and burn less fuel, making more profit or enabling the aircraft to fly to a farther destination.
I just came back from a round trip flight from New York to Stockholm/Copenhagen on a 787-8 and we cruised at 41,000ft on the way to Stockholm and at 38,000 on the way to New York. The typical 737/A320 flight within the US cruises at 30,000 to 32,000.
I died when the lady was talking and it said welcome aboard American Airlines! That face tho!
i love how they introduce something so significant with the "new" tech of the over head cabin drawer opening slowly.
Much nicer than it dropping so fast it knocks the sense or consciousness out of you.
I had the chance to go to Chicago in first class in one of these awesome, awesome plane!! It was the best plane experience EVER!!
Business Class, but okay.
Hey AA, a question: so how is a pretty aircraft with fancy interior lighting relevant when it doesn't take off or land on time? How is that self-tinting fancy window a good thing when it's caked with face grease from the kids on the last 10 flights and you haven't cleaned it? Asking for a friend....
Fabulous video looks very trendy plane the part I liked is the seats and TV screens in front very looking nice
YES!! I have family in Argentina and now I can fly in the 787!!!!
Now I'm excited for my flight because I'm riding this airplane
The 787 is a beautiful bird, I love it
flew on Ethiopian 787 dreamliner 14hours to and from South Africa great aircraft and wonderful hospitality bravo boeing nice aircraft
Why thank Boeing for hospitality? Isn't that hospitality of Ethiopian Airlines?
I was recently on a last generation 787. It was very similar with the over head bins and cool lightning but it didn't have the shaded windows. The television screens were similar with AC adapters but were not the same.
**not 787 it was a 737
+Beefyerky How is that at all relevant to this video?
Legroom still sucks.
I "love" how they selected a window seat that aligned nicely with the window to show off it's features ..., why not show off one of those awkwardly positioned window seats where the window is either behind your shoulder or nearly right by the backrest of the seat in front of you ...,
I am from Sweden and we go back there on vacation. I hope Scandinavian Airlines buys the Boeing 787!!
+Niklas Enblom You can fly Norwegian meanwhile. I just flew them from New York to Arlanda and then Copenhagen back to New York. They are actually pretty good... by that I mean fairly standard. Not any worse than SAS I think. I did find that the air pressurization in the 787 was better than average though. I have to swallow air 5 or more times during ascent and descent usually and I didn't have to swallow air at all at ascent to 40,000 feet, while just 2 times during descent this time around, so I'm very happy.
Had amazing 1st flight on an AA 787 ( actually any 787 ) from MIA -> CLO
What Boeing needs is to transform their dreamliners into solid oxide - fuel cell aircraft. Once that is done, the range would literally be doubled.
Hydrogen field cell aircraft can be done with smaller aircraft with shorter distances- and prices that reflect their carbon footprint.
- the issue is you have to make it worthwhile for someone to take that versus a regular aircraft or flight
last row alllll the way in the back, is there a window?
@3:11 How could he become a Check Pilot for the 787 so soon, its still such a new plane. I don't know how he would get enough flight hours to become a check pilot for that plane. Even just getting enough hours to become a captain for 787 is still tough.
any wrenches in the fuel tanks?
Oh stop it airbus fan boy.
You can also check it out on the travel magazine.
Way cool!
Maybe American Airlines would be interested in custom manhole covers with American Airlines lettered around the Wassenfels Museum center image.
when the passenger in front reclines, does the passenger behind lose out?
What a beauty, also what got me interested was
We have 2 usb plugs!
Me: PHONE HERE I COME
Those windows are cool but I'd prefer it they just had a clear and a dark option. Some idiots are going to keep them half dark all the time so the cabin won't be dark for sleeping.
gregbez It will be fine
The F/A can set a default for the entire cabin and then individual pax can adjust it.
Some idiots choose to close the shade just half way down. So?
what a beautiful plane. cant wait for SIA's b787-1000
I have never been on a plane it looks awesome I must face my fear
Are they also gonna renew their fleet of flight attendants. Since it is as old and worn as the planes are
That's actually so cool I want to fly in this
I WILL BE FLYING ON THIS PLANE ON JUNE 17, AND STILL CAN'T WAITING TO EXPERIENCE.
The best economy long haul plane is still the a330, 2-4-2 sets configuration, good seats and IFE, 3-3-3 planes are a nightmare
Do all their employees suck at english
Maybe you had difficulty understanding English.
very nice. configuration of 3-3-3 instead of the 2-5-2 like our former DC-10 standard or AFS DC-10 Transcon......very kool for cabin crews to serve and not stretch there arms toward the passengers . Job well done American
+The_Communist_ Texan JAL does 2-4-2 in economy. 2-3-2 is in Premium Economy. Which is a separate class.
thank you....................George
By the way, on a 2-5-2 layout, only a single row of passengers is two seats away from the aisle. With 3-3-3 seating, there are two rows of passengers who are two seats away from the aisle, so in fact, flight attendants reach more in the 787.
i wanna be first on that plane so i can use the traytable
You're late😂 this plane started traveling last year
Honestly try premium economy no matter what.
IFE, how American Airlines sees it - In flight entertainment
IFE, how I see it - In Flight Emergency xD
The 787 isn’t revolutionary, as Bruce said, the airplane is an evolution.
How long before USairways I mean American fly's this into a mountain or a large body of water?
AA never had the 717, so Mr. Fernandez was slightly incorrect. I'm guessing that he considers the 717 as part of AA since TWA had a few...which AA promptly discarded, lol.
Do the screens built in to the seats use Kodi?
When did American ever acquire or operate the Boeing 717?
Mortimer Duke AA got them when they bought TWA, then they sold them to AirTRAN
very nice boeing-787-800s view wow beast!!!
Buenos idas! I love the pronunciation lol!
This has been published a day before my birthday
are this 787 is long haul flight?
Lovely..but one must exercise extreme care when docking the areobridge to the 787 fuselage.Because of the fragile nature of the composite material a 5 centimetre gap must remain between the aircraft and bridge.Hard contact will result in composite denting and 'popping'..the surface pops back into shape like when a plastic bottle is compressed.
However,internal damage may result.Unlike other metal skins like the 747 the 787 is a lot more 'sensitive' rather than weak.
+Teva Bruce As opposed to thin metal skin, which will also dent, but will not "pop" back into its shape?
By the way, composite materials are harder than metals. Just try bending a composite bicycle or tennis racquet.
That was the Sarah Palin of flight attendants.
+madisonelectronic Thank you, but that's not me. That's Michael Rosen.
+Plumface-sama 5
+Plumface-sama Making fun of a flight attendant. What an internet tough guy you are.
+madisonelectronic That was a really intelligent remark ... is that all you have ??
Derek Knight I'm making fun of an incoherent person. Get off your high horse, you self-righteous urethra.
What is the seating capacity of this AA 787???
0:50 Anybody know what kind of technology with the glass is called?
Sharvin Nannan Panday It's called electrochromic glass. You can look it up in Wikipedia. Pretty cool stuff. :)
***** Thank you!!! :)
Its the same glass used to watch people getting the death penalty.
I generally travel in economy class. I am mostly price sensitive. So travel in any air line which is cheap.
Knowing American Airlines their overhead bins will still be full by the time people sitting towards the back board
How is that a fault of an airline? Is it because they actually fly full? Is it because they allow free carry-ons?
Thanks For The Tour
When the lady explains the luggage box, i noticed the voice in the back...
It is the same male voice of the chicago trains announcer?
Just curious. ...
2:11
So the capability of this is WELCOME ON BOARD AMERICAN AIRLINES
apartments in hong kong are smaller than each suite of this dreamliner
Not that I'm paranoid about flying or anything but I'd rather see further advancements in flight safety technology than flight luxuries.
Oh, these pilots bout to be BALLS DEEP!
No need for sexual innuendo.
Does the windows work like tft screen?
No, they work like sunglasses, which darken with sunlight.
i would feel so claustrophobic in that cabin crew rest area !
I want to fly in this nice plane I wonder how much it cost travel in first class
a quantum leap is not a large jump. 41k feet is not a ridiculous altitude for commercial jets. and just where in the hell is buenos itus?
Eric Miller I agree. And its Buenos Aires which is in Argentina
every 7 series? what about the 747, the joint best plane of all time with concorde?
can we all agree that the windshield looks like a Airbus and not a Boeing
Some of the hardest desines is wings,cockpit,fc,BC,and,eco,lights*,cabin,fc,BC,outside
So many options for women to feel nice and cozy, thank you men....
That hostess absolutely butchered the tinted window piece!
Hostesses are people who show you to your seat at restaurants. These are flight attendants. Do you mix up bus drivers and mechanics too?
George Lurye go easy there George hostess flight attendant who gives a shit
Does it fly
Its the same glass used to watch people getting the death PENALTY
What a shame, take a beautiful airplane like that and turn it over to a clown company like American Airlines.
Robin Sattahip Hopefully, now that US Airways Group has purchased American Airlines, they will steer the company in a better direction.
Robin Sattahip Airbus A350 XWB is much better tho
Aaron Trace Why? What is better about it?
Robin Sattahip Would you turn down BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars?
American Airlines is giod
"Screw this airline!"
Fuck u bitch
109 people sponsored by airbus
The system so that the airplane windows turn dark. It is achieved with two polarized crystals. And it is a Spanish invention.
Those first class seats are very similar to the Yin Yang British Airways seats on the 747.
I fly the 787 all the time
They've got a new plane so what, as soon as you get on they'll tell you to deplane to get a flight 1hr later which they mean is 15hrs later