Why None Of The White House's Claims About Impeachment Inquiry Are True: Political Scientist
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 сен 2023
- On "Forbes Newsroom," political scientist Charles Lipson reacts to the White House's reaction to the impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
I bust out laughing every time I hear the words "no evidence "
Name one piece of evidence?
Yet they can't say anything about evidence cause there is none.
@Elephantoflight This isn't a courtroom. Prove he's not corrupt.
@elephantoflight3362, That’s why Joe hired more lawyers to fight his impeachment than he did campaign staffers, because there’s no evidence 🙄
They have the laptop with lots of evidence. Whistleblowers, phone calls. Him doing a quid pro quo on television. Eyewitnesses. Proof of him lying over and over again about not knowing about his sons overseas business dealings. He’s now acting like those business dealings weren’t bad before he was saying he didn’t know about them at all. Fake shell companies. He’s also a pedophile read his daughters diary entries.
"Dont make me put my dad on the phone, just pay the 10% and you wont have to get korn popped".
There’s TONS of evidence!! The Party just has each entity by the 🏀 ⚽️ 🏈’s
Yeah I bet you think t RUMP and company are all squeaky clean?
What evidence?
@Elephantoflight This isn't a courtroom, prove Biden's not corrupt.
@elephantoflight3362, That’s why Joe’s kid tried to scam a federal judge for a plea deal with global immunity, because there’s no evidence 🙄
@@elephantoflight3362whistleblower testimony bank records, emails and text messages to start with
Never should have approved McCarthy as speaker. He’s a rino
Or KJP will just spin it that that story is so passionate to him that he wanted to tell it twice.
Lol clear brain damage. He's mentally spacy now
5:36 ''Becoming clear...'' 😆😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣
My man, it was clear that he wasn't playing with a full deck in 2018; this is hardly 'breaking news'... 🙈🙈🙈🙈🤣🤣🤣🤣
Cornpops hairy legs😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂really?
what evidence????
@User-got What's your proof he's not corrupt. Prove it!
@@user-gg6bl3qu5c I don't know anything about golf. When people are talking about golf I stay quiet. When we discuss politics you should stay quiet.
He's a little conflicted
Look at our country
talk about a biased media. my god. the evidence is overwhelming
Who is this person? How do we know what he’s saying is accurate. It’s all very vague. This is not clear reporting.
If you been paying attention to the outcome of whistleblowers testimonies and bank records...you would know its the same thing this guy is saying
Show us the statements bank transfers laptop 150 fed alerts
WHAT about the China money ?
incomplete reporting.
Dear Forbes viewers: Please take a step back and look at the overall nature and tenor of all the Forbes videos. Do you see a tendency? Do you recognize what they are doing?
Reporting the truth?. Lol you got some conspiracy theory you want to share?