**Simple** 1. The joint between the turret and the chassis is a structural weak point on any tank. 2. Russian tanks employ autoloaders to automatically chamber each round. The advantage of this approach is a 3 man crew instead of a 4 man crew, but the disadvantage is the ammunition is stored adjacent to the crew, rather than isolating it within its own reinforced compartment. When you put 1 + 2 together, you get a chain reaction of combustion. When a Russian tank is struck around the turret, the initial explosive charge is prone to set off the ammunition in the autoloader. The result is a flying turret and a vaporised crew.
No necesariamente. El 90% de las explosiones en la cabina se debe a que se almacena munición dentro de la misma, no porque el proyectil haya alcanzado el carrusel ya que este es un objetivo muy pequeño.
😂😩😆. I watch an embarrassing amount of RUclips (specifically Ukraine war videos) 100% the first time I’ve heard it. You gotta say it with a thick Russian accent. It’s too perfect 😅
@@hotnikles11 Perun does some good slideshow videos on the war. Sometimes he'll walk us through the adventures of Pvt. Conscriptovich, General Kleptovski, and Captain Bullshitski as they fumble about the battlefield XD
Muscovites now aim their kamikaze drones at the blowout panel whenever they encounter a western tank. And they time the impact for right after the tank has shot a round, so the ammo explodes when the blast door is open.
YOU R SO BACKWARD fyi usa haD been importing the only good vatnyk' product i.e rd 180 rocket engine so much so they designed their tank as rocket engine itself therefore any vatnyk aboard it is A barely COSMONAUT now 🤣
The carrier strike groups have about 4 destroyers. On top of this as a command ship they have a missile cruiser with 122 cells. They wouldn’t have just one destroyer launch interceptors at the Topol M. There would be several destroyers firing missiles. One topol isn’t enough to get through.
What worries me a little is that two good tanks are often more capable in combat than a single great tank. But then again, the 21 century wars are not about tanks fighting tanks. It's more like drones against everything else!
My father never won a tank design contract. He did win mobile artillery [bigger] and armoured personnel carrier [smaller] contracts. He said the US is hamstrung by requirement to armour around large soldiers, while the Soviets designed for 5' 7" max height. One big USA general yelled in my father's face, "BIG MEN ARE BETTER!"
Ukraine is winning just by the stalemate. Russia is losing men and machines at an unsustainable level. Especially with the sanctions imposed which means they can't build modern replacements.
God, I hate the bit at 2:46:21; I hated in the original video as well. Why on earth would any NATO commanders or officials ever in a million years go to a location that they can't secure top to bottom? Why would they go there if they didn't also see Russian officials approaching? That scenario is completely implausible. If they saw the lack of officials on the flight over they'd call it off immediately.
To be fair they are trying to change their ways with the T14 as it is a new and more advanced tank than the T90 it takes more money and time to produce
Abram and leopard tanks are also vulnerable and their crew are expendable, soviet tanks have prove strong after Bradley hit it several times and still functioning in Ukraine
@shulkfyre6449 it's not true that the russian tanks are strong.. and that Bradley he is talking about put a T90 the russian best tank out of action with a cannon 🤣
Now that Sweden has joined NATO, the Baltic states has another air force backing up their air bases. When Swedemn has moved planes and invite other NATO air forces like England, USA,Finland and Norway to use Gotland as a huge aircraft carrier in the Baltic sea the wargames will be quite different.
Something you are forgetting is the Russian tanks have speedier auto-loader so that is why they have that design. The Russian army is not running low on tanks in fact the war has made the Russians approach on how to use tanks and what to put on them much better: Such as the drone jammers or the fact that tanks do not Spear-head attacks any more but rathe the support the infantry.
Auto loaders aren't faster than human loaders and are responsible for countless tank crew casualties. Western tanks have far fewer casualties even tho they have an extra crewman.
@@LongJohnLiver western tanks have not fought against Kornets, but homemade IEDs, how the heck are you comparing the homemade IED's with $100,000 Javelins? Western tanks always had intelligence advantage because their enemies could barely afford a computer, Ukraine gets info from satellite.
@@Keshaw-ht3xk haha strawman logical fallacy fail. I never said, or compared, anything about IEDs or kornets. Neither did OP. Your reply makes zero sense. I simply said auto loaders aren't faster than human loaders and are responsible for a lot of Russian casualties due to the layout. That's it.
on the other hand, in Western tanks, attention is paid to the survival of the crew. After all, the value is not only the tank, but also the trained personnel. Nor can it be trained and replaced overnight. Therefore, in Western tanks, the projectiles are in a specially protected armor compartment, and if the lasers are still hit, the container is designed in such a way that the energy of the explosion is removed from the tank. This also increases the crew's chances of survival.
Although this difference in mentality was observed in the planes of the II. during World War II among American fighter planes and Japanese planes. Let's say between a Mustang and a Zero. In the American plane, they tried to armor the pilot's cabin and protect the fuel tank by placing it in a special rubber cover, which reduced the chance of exploding in the event of a hit. The Japanese didn't have anything like that. If the Japanese plane was hit, the pilot sacrificed himself for the Emperor and the Japanese in a fireball. The Japanese did not value the life of the soldier, as the Russians do. Ukrainian soldiers also love Western devices because they have a much better chance of surviving than in an Eastern device.
@LongJohnLiver I know most don't, but it's fun pointing it out none the less. They could be spouting made-up facts or simply committing plagiarism. Neither is great.
Given how much trouble the Russians have with their own equipment I sincerely question if they could even use European trains . I mean a few would probably figure it out by luck but what are the odds they would actually be able to use them properly on mass .... I mean they can't even figure out how to use tanks properly and that's not exactly a modern invention in the proper sense
Fast forward to today and both designs are death traps against drones. The modern tank is DOA, yet the US is pushing forward with ultra expensive AbramsX and Booker tanks. Edit: Hilarious outro on the video though. The Ukrainian counteroffensive ended in total failure, and Russia is back on the advance.
A huge major issue with Russian war logic is, it works with smaller nations, throwing numbers after numbers till the enemy is worn out, but that does not work against a huge coalition like NATO, let alone the US. The US alone has a population far greater than any Russian population at any time. not only does the USA have more men and women for fighting, The USA has more workers and more factories and superior manufacturing methods to make military weapons and vehicles and the USA has better enviroments to make food and other supplies for soldiers. So Russia is outnumbered and outclassed. we saw in the Gulf war how americans Abrams did much better than Russian t72s and t80s.
RUSSA CAN PRODUCE COMPUTER WEENEES BUT NOT COMPUTERS OR CHIPS ! IN W.W.2 AMERICA PROVED LARGE NUMBERS OF LESSER TANKS COULD DEFEAT A MARGINALLY SUPERIOR ADVERSARY ! THE PROBLEM IS WHEN THE MARGIN BECOMES TOO LARGE , A SIMETRIC WAR BECOMES POSSIBLE !
Could Russia win ? I think NATO'S time trainning together would do to Russian military. What the coalitions did to Iraq military in Kuwait 🇰🇼. Ukraine 🇺🇦 has shown this . With better tactics (NATO'S). Better weapons (NATO'S). Better morally (NATO'S). So too answer the question. No Russian military will not win .
From videos I’ve seen, from occupied Russian Luhansk, Donetsk areas. There are no men left. Any military age men are gone from cities and villages. The Russians took everyone aparently. They are all in the war. I won’t get into statuses.
Infographics is the best! I fall asleep to hours of it every night, and wake up to it every morning!
Thanks!
Poor man’s didn’t even get a heart
A McDonalds in every Super Mutant Camp would make Fallout feel very different.
Yet here I am stuck with the Institute's food packets.
2:07 “How many tanks do you need?”
“Yes.”
Got me dying
the mcdonald logo - flag on the tank made me laugh so hard hahahaha
Thank you for another long video infographic show I love listening to your videos whenever I can thank you for all of your content
Gotta say, as a huge fan of the Fallout video game series, I seriously appreciate the Fallout references at the beginning of the video 😂
**Simple**
1. The joint between the turret and the chassis is a structural weak point on any tank.
2. Russian tanks employ autoloaders to automatically chamber each round. The advantage of this approach is a 3 man crew instead of a 4 man crew, but the disadvantage is the ammunition is stored adjacent to the crew, rather than isolating it within its own reinforced compartment.
When you put 1 + 2 together, you get a chain reaction of combustion. When a Russian tank is struck around the turret, the initial explosive charge is prone to set off the ammunition in the autoloader. The result is a flying turret and a vaporised crew.
No necesariamente. El 90% de las explosiones en la cabina se debe a que se almacena munición dentro de la misma, no porque el proyectil haya alcanzado el carrusel ya que este es un objetivo muy pequeño.
No. Instead of a 4 man crew you have a no man crew. That is the difference.
Honestly I could listen to him talk about anything all day long. I’m in love with his voice!
Thank you! I thought the videos from Ukraine and Russia we’re done on your channel and I couldn’t understand why.
Because they realised Ukrainian isn’t winning with all the nato support they got
that McDonalds flag also represents my city (McDs hq is in Chicago) so was funny/awesome seeing it on the Abrams. 😂
Is Pvt. Constriptovich an old adage? The first (and only until now) place I heard of it was on Perun's channel, haha.
😂😩😆. I watch an embarrassing amount of RUclips (specifically Ukraine war videos) 100% the first time I’ve heard it. You gotta say it with a thick Russian accent. It’s too perfect 😅
@@hotnikles11 Perun does some good slideshow videos on the war. Sometimes he'll walk us through the adventures of Pvt. Conscriptovich, General Kleptovski, and Captain Bullshitski as they fumble about the battlefield XD
The title is misleading. Only the first 5 minutes has any thing to do with Russian tanks.
Tanks are pretty cool. I lived near to military base in my childhood. Tank drive through next our house everyday. Amazing vehicle .
Muscovites now aim their kamikaze drones at the blowout panel whenever they encounter a western tank. And they time the impact for right after the tank has shot a round, so the ammo explodes when the blast door is open.
The likelihood of cooking the ammo off during the tiny window of time the loader is pulling a new shell is astronomical.
The Muscovites are world champions in turret tossing.
YOU R SO BACKWARD fyi usa haD been importing the only good vatnyk' product i.e rd 180 rocket engine so much so they designed their tank as rocket engine itself therefore any vatnyk aboard it is A barely COSMONAUT now 🤣
yeah like chill out the space race ended decades ago
Haha @@3x4n. Your comment to this bot was super hillarius.
Thanks for my laugh.
@@nataliiateteruk585 why r you VATNYK?🤣
True
Interesting.
hmmm, the 40 billion Americans starving and homeless will appreciate the intro.
Seems like someone had too much Taco Bell 0:04
The carrier strike groups have about 4 destroyers. On top of this as a command ship they have a missile cruiser with 122 cells. They wouldn’t have just one destroyer launch interceptors at the Topol M. There would be several destroyers firing missiles. One topol isn’t enough to get through.
Is this why the US lost some of its telephone, space information and other information based computers were lost
These videos are how I get through my dead end job, I could stock groceries without these
What worries me a little is that two good tanks are often more capable in combat than a single great tank. But then again, the 21 century wars are not about tanks fighting tanks. It's more like drones against everything else!
Holy 4 Hours
... and 27 minutes and 50 seconds....
Biden told ukrn to hold whatever land it can cause it will only lose from here. Just defend
My father never won a tank design contract. He did win mobile artillery [bigger] and armoured personnel carrier [smaller] contracts. He said the US is hamstrung by requirement to armour around large soldiers, while the Soviets designed for 5' 7" max height. One big USA general yelled in my father's face, "BIG MEN ARE BETTER!"
This makes me think of one thing
"Dont buy IS-7"
are you guys still saying the russians are losing? lol
Only in the War Not the space race
Are Russian fangirls still saying Russia is winning even tho this was supposed to be a three week operation and it's been two years? Lol
@@LongJohnLiver What bozo thinks a nation stronger than Chechnya and Afganistan combined would take three weeks 🤣 Actually absurd.
@@Cotac_Rastic Putin and his top generals are the ones who said that lol
The mc donalds tank at 0:30...
💀💀💀
Some of this didnt age wer. " Lose of ruzzian oil for Germany would be catastrophic " well that didnt happen.
Say it to German recession and farmers protests
I had a suggestion, please make a video on the Love Has Won cult.
How many tanks do you need?
Yes!
yeah
Is it really 4 hours videos?
Of course cause its over biden told them to defend as they will lose land from now on. Last time to post it
Quantity is not a quality at all in unconventional warfare 😢but true
If only the new fallout could merge with the n64 era battletanx
You lying to me, I thought Ukrainian is winning😢
No-one is winning
@@labouraredangerousrussia is winning of course, go wathc the maps
grammar? where?
@johnwi-l_l-iamsf3763 maps 🤣 after two years and still only 18% percent 🤣
Ukraine is winning just by the stalemate. Russia is losing men and machines at an unsustainable level. Especially with the sanctions imposed which means they can't build modern replacements.
God, I hate the bit at 2:46:21; I hated in the original video as well. Why on earth would any NATO commanders or officials ever in a million years go to a location that they can't secure top to bottom? Why would they go there if they didn't also see Russian officials approaching? That scenario is completely implausible.
If they saw the lack of officials on the flight over they'd call it off immediately.
I love your content!
Russian Tank turrets has more airtime, than their entire air force in Ukraine 😂
Bro this has been talked about since day 1 lol😂
dang, a 4 hour long video.
lol biden told ukrn to defend cause it will only give away land and go backwards thats why
Private Conscriptovich??.. What happens to his name when he becomes a corporal.. Corporal Oguardovich?? and Sargeant Tenchuptovitch???..
LETS CREATE A FLOW CHART ! IS THIS AN IF INFLECTION POINT , OR A WHEN GATE ?
To be fair they are trying to change their ways with the T14 as it is a new and more advanced tank than the T90 it takes more money and time to produce
I feel as if western militaries always overestimate their opponents.
Or get cocky then get completley trashed
it seems that an armoured spearhead cannot achieve victory in a modern war
Abram and leopard tanks are also vulnerable and their crew are expendable, soviet tanks have prove strong after Bradley hit it several times and still functioning in Ukraine
🤣🤣
@@labouraredangeroushe is not joking it's true. If the crew survives it's all good yk
@shulkfyre6449 it's not true that the russian tanks are strong.. and that Bradley he is talking about put a T90 the russian best tank out of action with a cannon 🤣
it was disabled, not functional, still embarrassing that the " most advanced " tank got manhandled by ifvs
@@labouraredangerous that's not what I meant. Though an mbt got destroyed which is embarrassing yeah but my point is that the crew lived it.
Now that Sweden has joined NATO, the Baltic states has another air force backing up their air bases. When Swedemn has moved planes and invite other NATO air forces like England, USA,Finland and Norway to use Gotland as a huge aircraft carrier in the Baltic sea the wargames will be quite different.
Something you are forgetting is the Russian tanks have speedier auto-loader so that is why they have that design. The Russian army is not running low on tanks in fact the war has made the Russians approach on how to use tanks and what to put on them much better: Such as the drone jammers or the fact that tanks do not Spear-head attacks any more but rathe the support the infantry.
Auto loaders aren't faster than human loaders and are responsible for countless tank crew casualties. Western tanks have far fewer casualties even tho they have an extra crewman.
@@LongJohnLiver western tanks have not fought against Kornets, but homemade IEDs, how the heck are you comparing the homemade IED's with $100,000 Javelins? Western tanks always had intelligence advantage because their enemies could barely afford a computer, Ukraine gets info from satellite.
@@Keshaw-ht3xk haha strawman logical fallacy fail. I never said, or compared, anything about IEDs or kornets. Neither did OP. Your reply makes zero sense. I simply said auto loaders aren't faster than human loaders and are responsible for a lot of Russian casualties due to the layout. That's it.
That weakness was already know by U.S. and NATO forces.
You tal too FAST BUD !!! lol
I thought this is 4:25
Good info. Russia 🇷🇺 nowadays seems to have poorly trained soldiers that confront Ukrainian forces in the battlefield..
on the other hand, in Western tanks, attention is paid to the survival of the crew. After all, the value is not only the tank, but also the trained personnel. Nor can it be trained and replaced overnight. Therefore, in Western tanks, the projectiles are in a specially protected armor compartment, and if the lasers are still hit, the container is designed in such a way that the energy of the explosion is removed from the tank. This also increases the crew's chances of survival.
Not leopard
Abrams also will never fight at frontline will stay back by US orders
@@meteorknight999theres destroyed Abrams in Ukraine
OKay, but if it gets hot enough inside the tank to ignite the ammunition then everyone inside it is dead anyway
Is it another video claiming Russia is losing the war?😂
war?😂
smo
Although this difference in mentality was observed in the planes of the II. during World War II among American fighter planes and Japanese planes. Let's say between a Mustang and a Zero. In the American plane, they tried to armor the pilot's cabin and protect the fuel tank by placing it in a special rubber cover, which reduced the chance of exploding in the event of a hit. The Japanese didn't have anything like that. If the Japanese plane was hit, the pilot sacrificed himself for the Emperor and the Japanese in a fireball. The Japanese did not value the life of the soldier, as the Russians do. Ukrainian soldiers also love Western devices because they have a much better chance of surviving than in an Eastern device.
It seems you can't be arsed to reference sources to back up most of your "claims".
Most RUclips military videos don't include sources. Gotta do your own research for that.
@LongJohnLiver I know most don't, but it's fun pointing it out none the less. They could be spouting made-up facts or simply committing plagiarism. Neither is great.
@@Who-rx5ky I mean, Google is free lol
@@LongJohnLiver Lol so you eat up these claims with no proof to actually support them?
Go figure, westoid education at its finest
But in turn it makes the tank
smaller than NATO tanks
More than half a million casualties
Why in the world are you doing this😂 The Infographic Show 😮😢
Pretty confident Russia can't steamroll the baltics😂
Hard to enjoy information. Ungodly amount of commercial breaks.
As a tanker I can-confirm I am in the Russian Air Force jk
Given how much trouble the Russians have with their own equipment I sincerely question if they could even use European trains . I mean a few would probably figure it out by luck but what are the odds they would actually be able to use them properly on mass .... I mean they can't even figure out how to use tanks properly and that's not exactly a modern invention in the proper sense
🇬🇧👋 what wrong with are kettles
Fast forward to today and both designs are death traps against drones.
The modern tank is DOA, yet the US is pushing forward with ultra expensive AbramsX and Booker tanks.
Edit: Hilarious outro on the video though. The Ukrainian counteroffensive ended in total failure, and Russia is back on the advance.
A huge major issue with Russian war logic is, it works with smaller nations, throwing numbers after numbers till the enemy is worn out, but that does not work against a huge coalition like NATO, let alone the US. The US alone has a population far greater than any Russian population at any time. not only does the USA have more men and women for fighting, The USA has more workers and more factories and superior manufacturing methods to make military weapons and vehicles and the USA has better enviroments to make food and other supplies for soldiers. So Russia is outnumbered and outclassed. we saw in the Gulf war how americans Abrams did much better than Russian t72s and t80s.
Totalmente irrisible tu comentario. Los ucranianos son los que tienen la mayor cantidad de bajas.
Russia has a larger population
@@Jeb_bezosur iq has to be below 10. RU- >150M
USA-
RUSSA CAN PRODUCE COMPUTER WEENEES BUT NOT COMPUTERS OR CHIPS ! IN W.W.2 AMERICA PROVED LARGE NUMBERS OF LESSER TANKS COULD DEFEAT A MARGINALLY SUPERIOR ADVERSARY ! THE PROBLEM IS WHEN THE MARGIN BECOMES TOO LARGE , A SIMETRIC WAR BECOMES POSSIBLE !
First second
Russian tech has USA stuff in them??
So pretty much where USA designers of pinto corvair..pickups with gastank in cab..engineers went to Russia
Modern day nuclear weapons do not put off huge forms of radiation so if it was a nuclear war wouldn’t be a fallout scenario
This creator is mad...
DID PUTIN STUDY MATH ?
why? your javelin
Could Russia win ?
I think NATO'S time trainning together would do to Russian military.
What the coalitions did to Iraq military in Kuwait 🇰🇼.
Ukraine 🇺🇦 has shown this .
With better tactics (NATO'S).
Better weapons (NATO'S).
Better morally (NATO'S).
So too answer the question. No Russian military will not win .
Because Russian tanks are top-class; Western tanks aren't
iam thinkign they would assisnate putin beofre launhing nukes
From videos I’ve seen, from occupied Russian Luhansk, Donetsk areas. There are no men left. Any military age men are gone from cities and villages. The Russians took everyone aparently. They are all in the war. I won’t get into statuses.
But the Russians are good at parades. Real combat not so much.
Lol, America wouldnt be able to hold a candle to Russia if their situations were reversed.
E?
The west has always known about the design flaw in Russian tanks 😂 got to be one of the worse tanks ever made 😂
All?
Hiiiii
You were the real first. They can never take that away from you
Uh
im gone im not going to watch 4 hours of cartoons
eh, at least he puts effort into his content man. Cartoons or not they are always pretty interesting and well put together.
Странно, русских ботов в комментариях меньше чем в предыдущих видео, у фсб кончаются нефтяные доллары ¿...
Russian lollipops litter the Ukrainian countryside
everyone like my comment if you saw itnerceptor so they fix it!!!
russia hate
Boring!!!
So arrogant. America is spending billions on Ukraine and Ukraine is losing.
Creating russian human soup spontaneously
if you see this like it for the sake of boosting this video to get more veiws