Everytime I watch one of your vids for the 1st time I place myself somewhere in the building and watch to see if I would survive until the end in that location. 😊
I can’t believe the homeowners bought the house with absolutely NO CLOSETS! Also, the dryer downstairs is like “now you all feel my pain”, proceeds to be motionless the whole time 🤣😂
Another beautifull simulation. The end was funny, the impact earthquake is devastating. The tsjeljabinsk meteor in 2013 showed what even a small meteor of 20 m diameter already does. The sound of the supersonic explosions alone is already enormous
Hi! I have an idea So the screen is split in half, and one shows “Not protected for earthquakes” and one that is protected. To show that 2 countries or opposite countries may have less safe buildings. :)
That is a great idea! Because countries like Chile where I’m from, you start feeling the earthquake at 5+ and it barely moves, meanwhile other places which don’t have houses built for quakes, it can move quite more.
@@DominicanoCHL Ah, alguien mas se dio cuenta... A mi el video me parece simplemente ridiculo. No puedes hacer una comparacion si no indicas las conficiones del suelo, tipo de movimiento y profundidad del epicientro. Si no tomas en cuenta eso, tienes un video ridiculo como este, en que con un movimiento righter de 5 casi todo cae al suelo. Y nosotros sabemos que eso no es así. De hecho el suelo de Santiago y Valdivia son bastante distintos, y yo me baso en el suelo de santiago, pero en el video el sismo grado 8 parece el terremoto de Valdivia que fue de 9.5 o quizas superior... A mi me parece que esto es movimiento puro, sin suelo de por medio aminorando intensidad por friccion y distancia, y por tanto un muy mal video.
I’m sure bros house insurance will cover up all that damage :) But damn, that garage and basement is strong as hell, and the car is a real champ for surviving the meteorite earthquake! 👏
absolutely loved that one. i yelled "waaaay!", & laughed my head off, when the house finaly tumbled down. i think i remember hearing that the one we had in north wales, back in the 80s, that i described in a previous comment was a point 5.
Factors such as depth and distance from the center are important for the intensity of the earthquake. How can you create a simulation just by looking at size?
In short, you can't. But this guy don't have idea that he can't. It seems to be showing pure movement, without taking into account any other factors, which is completely out of place. It's like showing a swimming video without the water in the middle. Totally absurd...
I'd like to think the family is away on vacation because we don't see any people. But when they get home, they'll see an utterly destroyed house. I hope they have earthquake insurance
I am Chilean, 50 years old and I live in the central area, Santiago. Over the years I have experienced a countless number of "tremors" (for us they are minor earthquakes and do not deserve the title of earthquake) of grade 5 to 6 on the righter scale while on the street or in my house, first floor of construction 100% solid and second floor mixed solid and wood. And I can attest that the video is 100% wrong. Why?... Because everything depends on the type of soil, the type of movement and the depth of the epicenter. For the soil of Santiago de Chile, this video is so ridiculous that it is laughable. We hardly feel a grade 5 tremor and in the video everything falls. At first glance I can calculate that we have a difference of more or less a degree and a half between the movement of the video and what can be seen in reality in Santiago, for example.
It's a bit difficult to this seriously. A magnitude 5 at what distance and at what depth? The Mercalli intensity scale it what you should be basing your scenarios on.
I like how someone’s house in this 3D world is conveniently located beside an abyss.
Wow! The piano really held up nicely until magnitude 8. It is very sturdy, though. Keep up the good work! 😊
Everytime I watch one of your vids for the 1st time I place myself somewhere in the building and watch to see if I would survive until the end in that location. 😊
I do this too!
same
I found it funny how halfway through this video, I got a RUclips advertisement for home insurance.
That is actually quite interesting!!
That makes more sense than the time I was watching a documentary on the Fukushima nuclear disaster, and got an ad for a radiotherapy device.
@@laurens6654that s bad humor lol.
they know
I learned not to be near any bookshelves in a earthquake
Normally if you live in an area at risk you’d take the time to secure large heavy objects.
I kinda learnt that the hard way...
Who reads books these days…?
@@unknownunknowns
I read the IBC. It’s basically a law textbook. Surprisingly it isn’t as boring as you’d think, it has pictures!
That's why you secure furniture and appliances to the walls
I can’t believe the homeowners bought the house with absolutely NO CLOSETS! Also, the dryer downstairs is like “now you all feel my pain”, proceeds to be motionless the whole time 🤣😂
Another beautifull simulation. The end was funny, the impact earthquake is devastating. The tsjeljabinsk meteor in 2013 showed what even a small meteor of 20 m diameter already does. The sound of the supersonic explosions alone is already enormous
Hi! I have an idea
So the screen is split in half, and one shows “Not protected for earthquakes” and one that is protected.
To show that 2 countries or opposite countries may have less safe buildings. :)
That is a great idea! Because countries like Chile where I’m from, you start feeling the earthquake at 5+ and it barely moves, meanwhile other places which don’t have houses built for quakes, it can move quite more.
Nice idea!
@@DominicanoCHL Ah, alguien mas se dio cuenta... A mi el video me parece simplemente ridiculo. No puedes hacer una comparacion si no indicas las conficiones del suelo, tipo de movimiento y profundidad del epicientro. Si no tomas en cuenta eso, tienes un video ridiculo como este, en que con un movimiento righter de 5 casi todo cae al suelo. Y nosotros sabemos que eso no es así. De hecho el suelo de Santiago y Valdivia son bastante distintos, y yo me baso en el suelo de santiago, pero en el video el sismo grado 8 parece el terremoto de Valdivia que fue de 9.5 o quizas superior... A mi me parece que esto es movimiento puro, sin suelo de por medio aminorando intensidad por friccion y distancia, y por tanto un muy mal video.
@@Actkqk3 Si, toda la razón, al video le falta investigación..
I’m sure bros house insurance will cover up all that damage :)
But damn, that garage and basement is strong as hell, and the car is a real champ for surviving the meteorite earthquake! 👏
7:51 is precisely why I don't build my house without the fourth wall. Or at the very edge of a cliff.
you also have to think that magnitude is the perception of the earthquake, that can be influenced by ground type, depth, distance etc.
It really shows that going under the table during an earthquake is a great idea
I like the video playing in the piano room.
Thank you so much for watching my video! 😁
Nice!! Do an amusement park in a Richter scale 9.1 next time! Would love to see that!
absolutely loved that one. i yelled "waaaay!", & laughed my head off, when the house finaly tumbled down. i think i remember hearing that the one we had in north wales, back in the 80s, that i described in a previous comment was a point 5.
NEAT that you had a video of yours playing on the tv in that house👍
Yep!!! I’m glad you noticed that!!!
Factors such as depth and distance from the center are important for the intensity of the earthquake. How can you create a simulation just by looking at size?
thought tha same
And the ground beneath you. I was in a 7 but reacted like a 4 depicted here.
In short, you can't. But this guy don't have idea that he can't. It seems to be showing pure movement, without taking into account any other factors, which is completely out of place. It's like showing a swimming video without the water in the middle. Totally absurd...
Meteor one was basically just like a roller coaster for everyone and everything. 😂
👏👏👏THX 👍👍👍
The earthquake within the earthquake…on the tv screen.
Your viewers have some interesting ideas. I think their original 😅. A split screen I've seen and am using when I transpose your videos. 😊
Yep! thanks for watching!!
Ngl i love your videos!
The spring on the back of that TV. Woah. 🤣9:21
There was an earthquake near my house with a Richter scale of 7.3 (7.6). Time point: 9.21, 1999 AD
Can you make a video about a Earthquake simulation in a tunnel under a mountain or the sea like the Mancha Channel (UK- France).
The last one 💀💀💀
I'd like to think the family is away on vacation because we don't see any people. But when they get home, they'll see an utterly destroyed house.
I hope they have earthquake insurance
that tv shows a earthquake sim😊
Haha yes it is!!!
1:41 YEET
9:22 The TV was flying around.
i found it better when you make a unvisibal Wall on the open sight
8:30 why the TV is FLYING??
The TV has plane mode too
Agree😂
I was watching that little TV the whole time
well built house! a roof that can take its chimney, like Nothing👍😎
Think you could do a roller coaster one?
The real question: how did the car ever get into the garage?
it teleported
Nice house !
We need a bridge next time
ohh the garage is still ok after the 8 magnitude
Interestingly, the underground floors are not damaged. So is the subway safe even during a strong earthquake? 🤔
nah
Check whether the subway station is sturdy or not
Nice house.......
Can you please make an earthquake simulation of each Moment Magnitude Scale with 2km depth
Oh no, it even got the composer's piano!
Where’s all of the joists? The studs? I feel like it’s unrealistic due to that fact.
Hi! Can you please make a castle, thanks!
8:29 tv: YEEET
what is your simulation program ?
I am using Blender 3D 😊
The safest place to be in an earthquake? A tree house? Let's find out 😊
What about the intensities? Maybe we have to guess them? 🤔
Day 1 of Asking To Make Green Screens Of Realistic Buildings, Towers And Bridges Collapsing
I learn to not be by collapsing buildings
Richter magnitude is not a helpful way to describe this. Stating how close the building is to the hypocentre us much more informative, as is MMI
its that A SUPPPPRRRAAAAA????!!!!!!!
I am Chilean, 50 years old and I live in the central area, Santiago. Over the years I have experienced a countless number of "tremors" (for us they are minor earthquakes and do not deserve the title of earthquake) of grade 5 to 6 on the righter scale while on the street or in my house, first floor of construction 100% solid and second floor mixed solid and wood. And I can attest that the video is 100% wrong. Why?... Because everything depends on the type of soil, the type of movement and the depth of the epicenter. For the soil of Santiago de Chile, this video is so ridiculous that it is laughable. We hardly feel a grade 5 tremor and in the video everything falls. At first glance I can calculate that we have a difference of more or less a degree and a half between the movement of the video and what can be seen in reality in Santiago, for example.
(your "can buildings collapse after an earthquake" video has "8888" views......). :)
3:27 wait the windows are not broked lol
i awlways skip the (not cloapse)until it clapse
Show a t.v. station while the news is on.
HOW DID THE CAR NOT FALL!
Where would it fall to? It's on the lowest level
@@nancyomalley6286 ok
4D
POV:you're in Japan 2011
Yay, my ex-boss's house!
Earthquke
House
weiting earthquacke simulation in japan
hi
5th!
It's a bit difficult to this seriously. A magnitude 5 at what distance and at what depth? The Mercalli intensity scale it what you should be basing your scenarios on.
≣