Ben's Best from 2017: Maxime Vachier-Lagrave vs Ben Finegold

Clip with Ben [06-13-2024]
If you're interested in sponsoring a lecture of your choice, email Karen at [e-mail]
Check out Ben's Chessable courses here! www.chessable.com/author/BenF...
Signup or gift a chess.com Premium membership to get access to their lessons, remove ads, improve your chess, AND help Ben at the same time!! Upgrade your chess.com membership or join! - go.chess.com/finegold.
Buy Merch today! ccscatlmerch.com/
Watch live at / itsbenandkaren
Donations are appreciated at: streamlabs.com/itsBenandKaren...
Follow me on Twitter: / ben_finegold
#benfinegold #chess #2017

[@ronsenyor5996]

Dude I wanna sponsor the best games from a decade lecture.. 20-30 year old fine gold. Assuming that’s when you were overseas

[@GMBenjaminFinegold]

email Karen with your idea! [e-mail] - Ben’s Editor

[@wfcyellow]

Ken West's 2015

[@brentonkim]

5:40 Qe2 into an overworked pawn, crazy hard to see

[@rhysjones4250]

Isnt it more realistic to get nakas analysis than the computer though? Human vs human you want someone who sees what MVL would 'more likely' see. Beating MVL isnt beating stockfish.

[@mikkelhansen3714]

Probably MVL finds Ne6 as its the only move

[@rhysjones4250]

@mikkelhansen3714 he will find some moves but analysing the entire last portion of a game with computer is futile.
The computer will only ever get a top level human GM say 20 moves into a game. I think thats what im trying to say.

[@T-Dogg121]

@@rhysjones4250 I think Ben knows how to analyse lol

[@rhysjones4250]

@T-Dogg121 missed my point entirely. But for your point to be true then why is he asking nakamura and using stockfish. The hunter becomes the hunted 😆
But back to what im saying in my post... you missed my point.

[@SkateSka]

@@rhysjones4250 That's what the internet is for buddy, missing the point :D

[@xwngdrvr]

Five point two minutes with Ben! Plus tax.