Isnt it more realistic to get nakas analysis than the computer though? Human vs human you want someone who sees what MVL would 'more likely' see. Beating MVL isnt beating stockfish.
@mikkelhansen3714 he will find some moves but analysing the entire last portion of a game with computer is futile. The computer will only ever get a top level human GM say 20 moves into a game. I think thats what im trying to say.
@T-Dogg121 missed my point entirely. But for your point to be true then why is he asking nakamura and using stockfish. The hunter becomes the hunted 😆 But back to what im saying in my post... you missed my point.
Dude I wanna sponsor the best games from a decade lecture.. 20-30 year old fine gold. Assuming that’s when you were overseas
email Karen with your idea! karen@atlchessclub.com - Ben’s Editor
Ken West's 2015
5:40 Qe2 into an overworked pawn, crazy hard to see
Five point two minutes with Ben! Plus tax.
Isnt it more realistic to get nakas analysis than the computer though? Human vs human you want someone who sees what MVL would 'more likely' see. Beating MVL isnt beating stockfish.
Probably MVL finds Ne6 as its the only move
@mikkelhansen3714 he will find some moves but analysing the entire last portion of a game with computer is futile.
The computer will only ever get a top level human GM say 20 moves into a game. I think thats what im trying to say.
@@rhysjones4250 I think Ben knows how to analyse lol
@T-Dogg121 missed my point entirely. But for your point to be true then why is he asking nakamura and using stockfish. The hunter becomes the hunted 😆
But back to what im saying in my post... you missed my point.
@@rhysjones4250 That's what the internet is for buddy, missing the point :D