Shane Gillis on His Beef with Joe Rogan's Producer Young Jamie
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- Watch Full Episode - • Shane Gillis on Wrestl...
Flagrant is a comedy show that delivers unfiltered, unapologetic, and unruly hot takes directly to your dome piece. In an era dictated by political correctness, hosts Andrew Schulz and Akaash Singh, along with AlexxMedia and Mark Gagnon, could care less about sensitivities. If it’s funny and flagrant it flies. If you are sensitive this podcast is not for you. But if you miss the days of comedians actually being funny instead of preaching to a choir then welcome to The Flagrancy.
Join the Patreon Army:
bit.ly/2xQwHYf
#AndrewSchulz #AkaashSingh
Find Andrew Schulz at:
/ andrewschulz
/ andrewschulzny
/ @theandrewschulz
an...
www.theandrews...
Watch his Special 'INFAMOUS' at: • Andrew Schulz - INFAMO...
Watch him in 'You People' starring Eddie Murphy & Jonah Hill on Netflix
Find Akaash Singh at:
/ akaashsingh
/ akaashsinghcomedian
/ @akaashsinghcomedy
ak...
www.akaashsing...
Watch his Special 'BRING BACK APU' at: • White Male Privilege i...
Find Mark Gagnon at:
www.instagram....
ma...
/ @markgagnon
Find AlexxMedia at:
www.instagram....
al...
www.alexx.media/
Book studio time at WTF Media Studios here: www.wtfmediast...
"Jamie pull up that clip of you having beef with Shane Gillis"
Schultz looks like a young handsome adolph hitler.
And then this podcast reacts to that clip, jamie pulls that clip up and we divide by zero
And the answer is 1 clip, not zero clips
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣
The chances of getting four aces, and splitting them like that insane
Not that uncommon... happens more than you think with all denominations 💯
@@HempdogOh yeah? Did your top ramen forehead tiktok haircut tell you that?
it’s 6 decks
Casinos only let you split aces twice if you're betting huge everyone else is stuck with 2 12's in that situation.
@@Paul-vf2wlnot true
Never knew yung Jamie looked fuckin older than joe
I remember when he had covid and came back on the show and they showed him and everyone was like that aint no young jamie 😅
EMF and blue light poisoning. lol
He looks both 25 and 50 at the same time
Andrew's pants are basically shorts now.
Borderline of shants and jorts lmfao
Some men roll up their sleeves when they go to work. Andrew, well....
6th/7th grade, as a chubby, short, awkward kid, had some shorts that were wayyyy too long😂 probably about and inch or 2 shorter than those
It’s the only thing I like about his appearance
that is full Hitlerjugend uniform. Together with haircut.
Tbf, imo Shane recognizes Jamie, the most! Of any guest.
My dawg always passes the beerbong, reminds us Jamie is the captain.
Mark Normand too!
100%
Paul Stamets always loves when Jamie finds something he asked him to look up lool, he even makes sure to ask him nicely and acknowledges him
You have ad reads in your clips? How gay
a•Greed
They could be getting banged in the video hard by a basketball team with foot longs and they would still be more straight than you and your buddies, we all know know what you were doing on those sleepovers, you dad even knew, he saw you one night and pleasured himself to it and that’s why he left, he knew he was going to start doing stuff to you and he wasn’t ashamed, he just knew you were a snitch to keep the heat off what you were doing on those sleepovers and knew the guys in jail would bully him about it.
It's youtube doing it.
@@lightlybatteredjustcrispy actually the uploader is able to choose when and where to place ads, cuck.
alright ya'll this is the etiquiette specifically for gambling. if you back somebody's bet, buy them a lottery ticket, give them money for slots, whatever, you always split the winnings with that person 50/50. it's not so much a rule as it is the honorable thing, and probably the expected thing. like if you don't do that just don't be surprised if you're not friends with that person anymore is all i'm saying.
Staking someone to split or double down is more like a temporary interest free loan. Not at all like going in on slots or lottery ticket where the normal expectation would be to split winnings. Unless of course you both agree beforehand if the blackjack bet loses, their is no repayment of the bet In which case I hundred percent agree with you.
But in the dozens of times I’ve done this in real life, the agreement is always, they will run to an ATM or online transfer me some money should the bet lose, therefore I’m not taking any risk and only want my original bet amount back.
well i kind of disagree, but i mean if you plan out repayment and what happens if the hand hits before then that's between the two people who made the agreement. and it may be that you personally don't expect a cut of the winnings but that makes you a hella cool paragon of humankind and the person should give you a cut anyway because it's a team effort. they wouldn't have won all that money had you not spotted them. friends should share in the wealth, and i'd feel bad if i hit with my friends money and didn't repay them in spades with a cut of the winnings. it's just a chad move to split the money and help each other out that way you both walk away happy. bolstering the friendship instead of possibly sowing resentment. also it's not a thing i would do for a stranger which is why i keep saying friend. because there's always the chance you'll never see that repayment or that you're enabling someone with a gambling addiction. i suppose circumstances vary like say the friend needs the money or you're barely chipping in any money or something. but as a baseline 50/50 splits are the best way to go about it and generally expected. i didn't make the rule. it's the unwritten gamblers code. the rule's more for the benefit of the person recieving the loan than it is for the person giving it anyway to avoid social faux pas, resentment, and other various philosophical reasons.
@@KemperFi13 oh also you may be right if you're staking someone for one normal hand of blackjack because it's generally not a big deal. but in this specific scenario where it's 4 aces and shane is backing 75% of it, which is above and beyond a normal yeah i'll stake you to split or for one last hand thing. so 50/50 and the promise of a repayment for the 3 aces which all won would be pretty fair. that's a bigger back and bigger winnings than normal. and is a wild stroke of luck. shane's still an ass for bullying jamie for more than that though
@@matthewbailey4768 If it’s a loan, you should only expect repayment. If you’re sharing the risk, then I agree with you. 90 percent of the time I’ve been in this situation (as lender or borrower) it was simply to save time from exchanging cash and converting them into chips in the middle of a hand which requires a pit boss, or saving a trip to the ATM in the middle of a hand thus it’s like a 20 second loan, no biggie. Borrower or lender is assuming the original payment not sharing of winnings because we are not talking about investing in a start up or buying into a lottery pool. Your staking or getting staked for like 20 seconds or however long it takes your friend to run to an ATM or Venmo you if they lost
@@matthewbailey4768 At the very least the person shouldn't be surprised when none of their friends will spot them for bets if they don't share the wins everyone else is paying for. You don't have to be a gambling expert to know there's 0 reason to give someone your money and you might only get back what you invested IF they win. It just comes off very cheap and I'd feel like a dick not giving someone something for spotting me money if I win
Ads on clips is wild
A buddy of mine had this happen where I backed his bet that he wanted to split. It worked out so that me backing those beta mage the dealer bust on his card instead of getting like a 19 or 20. My buddy paid me the winnings and another guy at the table slipped me a chip too. It’s nice when people recognize and appreciate the help.
Please edit…I had a stroke and my wife died, trying to read this
@@jadenwracing8176 my drunk self was so proud of that comment it feels wrong to edit it
@@hubertcumberdale6404 respectable… have a nice day
@@hubertcumberdale6404well played…I spazzed trying to read that one line but I got through it and understood it ahaha
@@jadenwracing8176 yeah it beta mage me freak out.
So, my uncle was a professional pool player, and what needs to be said is there is no written or unwritten rule when it comes to backing somebody. Every deal is different just like every game is different.
Sometimes backing somebody is like giving them a loan. Usually interest is applied to the money you were backed. Instead of the backer sitting at the table paying off after every loss, there's an agreement. I'll let you hold 10gs in a week I need 12500.
Now you can turn that 10000 into 100000 and that man only expects12500, and he'll be happy about it.
A backer may set up a game, and pay an hourly wage. My uncle had this happen a lot. Win loose or draw he got paid. Sometimes the back end was more lucrative if you get what I'm saying.
A gambler knows when you're bust, you're at the backers mercy, which is where Jamie was. Especially if the deal wasn't negotiated. In this case don't expect half the winnings. You can complain about it, but never ask anything from that person again or you're probably not going to get as good of a deal.
Jamie needs to grow up, and not try to use the friend card when dividing money he couldn't afford at the moment.
Pool (or golf or any performance based competition) is a lot different than playing cards. The sponsor is almost never capable of securing a bag themselves so they need the player.
As for cards you have to expect your friends are going to be disappointed if you step over their corpse for a hand they started. It's a Schrodinger Equation. Their presence at the table places you in a different universe than one where they didn't influence the cards. If a stranger leaves cards because they're broke then go ahead and take them, they've most likely already walked away or will when the game's over. But if your friend is still there chilling because you've got more money to blow then there's a fine line between the loan being a cover so they can play too and an 'investment' that you're now entitled to. Especially if you framed the whole situation by saying "money isn't real."
You typed a whole bunch of nothing 😂
lol and I’m sure Jamie can afford it
A loan is only ever going to be helping a friend out or an investment
Jamie for sure makes at least a half million on Rogan lol he shouldn’t be tripping over $800 bucks
I bet he only makes half that, which would still be good money for the job. Maybe Spotify changed it and Rogan is happy to have him but he's honestly a pretty terrible researcher and constantly flubbing the camera shot. Moving to Austin is the outlier. Maybe Rogan bought him a house.
@@danlowethere are times when he can’t find something that I find it within seconds. I think he gets butt hurt about certain topics and doesn’t want to help a guest with their argument so he just says he can’t find it. He knows Joe changes topics quickly so it rarely comes back on him.
@@butlerbees6639 I see that too, where he pushes back like he doesn't want to get banned from the Neil Degrasse Tyson pool party. I appreciate skepticism but just defaulting to a mainstream consensus gets old, especially when they've spent a lot of time debunking mainstream BS.
Im a huge shane fan but with that logic shane shouldn't have cared even more. Dude makes like half a million every month from JUST patreon.
That much to do literally nothing
Every deal is different so terminology is key. Did he ask you to lend him money (in which case it's just a loan he pays back no matter what, not an investment in the play) or did he ask "do you want this action" (in which case you're not lending him money, you're investing in the gamble with him and are subject to both gains/losses).
“Jamie pull up… your balls”
IMAGINE HAVING BEEF WITH A GUY WHO LITERALLY NEVER SAYS A WORD.
Dicks out for Harambe.
And is labeled "young", eventhough turning 50 years old soon
Who only pulls things up for others
I'll need some proof of that.... "hey Jamie,pull up some proof on that."
When he does say anything, Joe shuts him down real quick.
Normally the one asking money for the bet bears the risk, so if he borrowed $500 and lost he would have owed $500 but if he win, he gives back the $500+ 10-15% tip and keep the earnings. That is pretty common in the betting world.
In poker, when you have a backer, the backer gets their money back, plus half or more of your winnings. I don't know where Shane got the idea in poker, people back other people and only expect back what they lent out to back them. That's not how horses (players who are backed) work.
This wasn’t poker it was blackjack. Also that’s not how poker works you got some prison rules going on or something idk 😂
@@ThumbDr It is how staking in poker works...go to 2+2's staking forums...I played professionally for a year in 2010, only stopped when the government seized the site and all our money (they gave it back three years later).
@@ThumbDr Lol, that does sound like some prison rules. Wouldn't even be worth the risk of placing a bet in the first place if the loaner gets more than 50%. It should always be discussed before hand and if not then 50/50 split is fair.
@@ThumbDrhe said “in gambling” (poker implied) and in poker if someone backs you (usually they just stake your whole buy in) this is how it works. Usually it is agreed on first depending on if the horse is a pro or amateur. Most pros don’t pay any of their buy ins but also don’t make nearly as much from tournament winnings alone. Pros make most of their money from sponsors. Poker is weird when you’re talking 50k dollar buy ins.
But this is only the case usually when someone stakes a huge majority of someone’s buy in. Cash game or tournament.
Only true when the player is selling action. Lots of poker players will lend money to other players they trust, often time with no interest. In that case the player keeps the winnings but assumes the loses also.
Shane gives folks flowers more than most and Shulz doesn’t deserve any more imo. He gives off a jealous/envious vibe of Shane
In blackjack, when another player or bystander funds a split that you can't afford, the risk of loss is 100% on the bystander, w/ no additional risk to the player unless the two have discussed it as a loan. The bystander is doing the player a FAVOR b/c having to play on with two Aces is weaker odds than if you split them. I have never seen the player take the winnings of both his and the bystander's bet. The bystander is a good guy to fund the split. He's responsible for a loss but gets his winnings for his risk. The player insisting on keeping all winnings and just returning bystanders original bet back to him is nonsense.
I think you should discuss beforehand who bears the risk, like if the lending person will get their money back or if the bet looses, they lose their money.
If they anyway get their money back, without risk, they don’t really deserve much of the winnings. Maybe like a tip of 5-10%.
But unless you agree on this before, either party could say that they did or didn’t bear the risk after the bet is over.
That’s exactly what’s happening here I’m sure Jaime thought that was the case and Shane is being a typical 🐱 being passive aggressive saying he doesn’t care when he obviously does
Clips with their ad reads is fucking hilarious
The right answer is it depends on the level of friendship between the two. If you're my boy, I'm splitting it with you because money will never come in the way between a friendship when you're out having fun. Borrowing money is another thing, but when you're just out having a blast with a good pal, you split it.
If you're just an acquaintance or someone I don't have a deep friendship with, I give you a cut that I feel is fair. If not, then I tell you: as far as the casino is concerned I'm seated and playing, you're not. They'll kick you out, not me. Get f*cked.
Video was funny until it was a gambling ad lmao
Yea who would sign up for that. Sounds like a scam where you’re 100% going to lose the $ you deposit. No one ever cashes out
You clarify before taking the money if the lender is TAKING your bet or if they're LENDING you money to take your bets.
Exactly, clearly too complex for these idiots
As a blackjack player NEVER take money from someone else.
don't you hate when you have to sit through an entire podcast before you can get to the advertisement?
😂
Know your friends there's no way I would ever let somebody give me money to gamble win and then not give them some of the winnings. If it wasn't for them, I wouldn't be able to play in the first place.
yeah wtf..he should have split it. If Shane got 75%, why would Jamie even bother "staking"?
Cause he would've ended up with 2 or 12 (which isn't ideal) instead of increasing his chances to get a 21. I think I'm not a pro.
It’s simple u gotta make the agreement before hand or this would happen all the time.
Have Shane Gillis on the show again NOW before he blows up and forgets about you guys 🥲
he's one of the biggest stand-up on the planet rn, what do you mean "before" he blows up? that happened 2 years ago
😂😅 Shane likely won't be on Flagrant ever again... (The Down Syndrome Jokes)😬🤦🏽♂️ ruclips.net/video/kFWu0rbhozw/видео.htmlsi=laVceU-VNUdZjNK9
@@cropduster123you don’t even know comedy
@@cropduster123yet you’re here watching videos he’s in. cringe.
Uhh I like Shane. You know Andrew has sold out arenas right like M.S.G.? I'm not even a fan and I know this. You think Shane is gonna sell out M.S.G. next year or even 2 years from now?
The general rule of thumb is you spot the person gambling and if they hit, whether it be playing slot machines or cards, then you split the winnings.
1:15 Shane became Seth Rogen for a split second
Jamie is correct. If I stake my friend, I just expect my original bet back. And if he loses, he pays me back whatever I stake him. This is normal gambling etiquette. The only way I’d ask for a percentage of the winnings is if we agreed if the hand loses, he doesn’t pay me back and we are sharing the risk and are essentially partners in the hand.
Yeah i think degenerate gamblers shouldnt claim to have some code of etiquette.
Yup. Exactly how it works.
@Martin-kr1qn Absolutely there should be a code of etiquette when money is involved numbnuts.
yeah jamie is right as long as he pays shane the stake back regardless of win or loss. not sure what people are struggling with here i dont even gamble lol
@@charlie-horsebecause the gambler has nothing to lose and everything to gain . U act like it’s a federal secure loan . 😂
Even stories about gambling stress me out
If you’re getting backed in poker is 50% profit for backer plus the buy in and the loss is burden by the backer
If you back someones bet you don't have to put equal amounts on, if it's an equal amount it's a 50/50 split, if it's 25% of the original bet, it's 25% of whatever is won. If he backed the bet 2x what the original bet is, then it's ambiguous and I assume that's what happened.
Shane....the only comedian not shouting when having a conversation
As someone who played poker professionally for years, jamie is talking nonsense about backers dont take percents of your winnings. They will take minimum 50 usually 60. Thats the whole point of backing someone. The player being backed is even referred to as a "horse"
I was a blackjack dealer/pit boss for 16 years. You really have to come to an agreement first. Sometimes it’s just borrowing it and they just give you your money back. In other cases the deal is you get your money back and split the winnings on the hands you bet on. Some cases it’s all yours except whatever hand the player bet on because you had all the risk. Sometimes I’ve literally seen them just pick and hand and say “I’ll take this one.” Point being, y’all need to establish your deal first because I’ve seen literal fights break out over that shit
Calling Jaimie young when he's like 50 is wild
The correct thing to do is to pay the original stake plus half of the fronted profit.
Example:
Jamie: $10
Shane: $30 (10 by 3)
All regular win return:
Jaime: 10+25
Shane: 30+15
All loss return:
Jaime: 0-30
Shane: 30
It’s margin borrowing, and it’s the only correct way. The margin rate can be figured out on the fly. But, it’s usually half for gambling table games. You can take it down to 1/5th for sport booking. This is only amongst friends. When you’re talking a shy, that’s usually an automatic interest regardless of outcome.
You have to admit that it's a bit deranged to have this calculus "just for friends" especially if they're not also trained gamblers. You're hanging out together, it just happens to be a casino and the only reason the guy hasn't left the table when he's broke is because you've got more money and you're there together. He can either twiddle his thumbs on the bench and you can quit the game early and join him, or you can consider it a cover so he can go on playing the same game you are. If you're going to invoke house rules then you should just start billing for your time as an escort and not a buddy.
@danlowe spoken like a filthy casual. This is serious gambling
@@senseisteve3011 You only gamble on golf or pool or something you can actually control. Otherwise you're just playing dungeons and dragons but getting slightly more STDs
Damn. Y’all put “beef” & 2 more popular comedian’s names in the title, and it still has less than 100 comments?
I know y’all’s channels having been falling off since April, but botting isn’t going to stop it. 😂😂
Why since April?
Akash is so see-through
Putting an ad on clip is crazy
Generally in poker. When somebody buys you in, especially if he covered 100%... If you win, you gotta pay him the whole amount of the buy-in and then you split the winnings (50/50, 60/40, etc...).. You wouldnt have gotten anything at all if the staker didnt finance your way in.
So we're just editing boring clips and adding Young Jamie's name for ads now?
If you told me Jamie was John Travolta’s little brother, I’d totally believe it.
Zero debate needed. Shane was due half of the three hands he helped with.
Nonsense, Jamie should keep 100%.
Only when the money covered is a large amount and/or viewed as a 'loan', different story and terms should be discussed prior.
Every Shane story I’ve ever heard: “he was being real, and I was just hammered.”
This is why you agree on the terms before you win/lose.
If he was going to pay you back if they lost then he should just throw you a few hundred. But if he wasn't paying you back then you should definitely even split
Dana white looking in disgust as they fight over 3500 🤣
If I didn’t bet my 7’s on blackjack and someone wanted to play that, they usually would be pretty nice when they won and give me something.
This is why, when you go into a gambling situation
You set the rules for what's what
Becuase some people warp what's etiquette and not etiquette to fit their agenda
Big question is....why didn't Jamie have $800 to gamble? It's not like hes short on cash, or shouldn't be. Jamie doesn't like gambling his own money by the sound of it.
There's no ATM at the table. He probably bought in for all he had left on him, had been losing, and then yolo'd that hand but didn't have split/double money.
Now i know why Jamie always wears a hat. His hairline is crazy.
Throw that bud light out
Andrew looking like a Schindler's List antagonist!
The one that RISKS the money, gets the winnings, in the same way they would lose the loss.
well it was a safe bet thanks to jamie that was waiting for the Aces so he should have 70 %
If your stake horsing anyone you accept all the losses and for that you get and agreed upon percentage of the winnings anywhere from 50 to 80 percent. Now Shane was not stake horsing Jamie. He simply spotted him some cash so Jamie could maximize his betting opportunity that his luck brought him. Shane has no right to steal Jamie's hand of luck by claiming he had been stake horsing him because he hasn't taken any of the losses up to that point. He borrowed him money to finish the hand and should only be repaired the borrowed amount. Guaranteed if Jamie had lost Shane would have expected repayment.
Jaime is right here I think, If he losed he should pay back the loan and if he would win he get all. That's pretty basic in gambling, but it can easily be a issue when it comes to borrow money while gambling. But I love Shane, but I believe Jaime is more a serious gambler who is trying to be more a professional gambler and Shane is more a lay back "gambling for fun"- type of a guy and they are just approaching gambling differently. True or not? Just my take 😊
What’s the dude in the end? Akash? You can tell these dude grew up a total cornball because anytime bro code comes up he has no idea how it works, gambling, girls, whatever, he has no idea how these things work.
4:02 - 5:20 Is he looking at the wrong camera or just shamelessly reading all that off a cue card?
Makes sense Shane gets a cut but not 75% unless agreed upon ahead of time. If not agreed upon he should get the mathematical difference in starting with and ace vs any other card.
Why is he young Jamie he looks older than joe
It’s the hairline. He needs to shave it off.
He used to be young.
Its good to see big guys understand us. Thank you joe
Gillis beefing with everyone cool i swear
Jamie is in the right. You are not entitled to the winnings. You just get the same money back win or lose. Staking is completely different where you are entitled to a share of the winnings, but you don't get anything back if it's a loss. Akash doesn't know wtf he's talking about.
Then why risk loaning someone money like it’s a guaranteed to get paid back . The person loaning is taking a bigger risk then the person gambling.
@@lizardman1303 You only loan to friends lol
@@ba8e I guess it depends on how much money the bet is wasn’t this a couple k . From my experience when ever I loans to family in my head I already counted it a loss because they broke people
Not sure what is the accepted protocol, but i personaly would have split it.
It's concerning that Jamie looks like Joe Rogan's dad
We need some “young Jamie” rap shirts
No way! If you back bets you are doing that. If he loses he should have to pay u back. He wins it’s his money
Yes, etiquette on the blackjack table is that if someone else is betting on your hand, that is now their hand, except for the bet that you made when it comes to splits that is. or if the player double downs for you you would split earnings.
Imagine having a short about gambling issues and the effects it can have on friendships then immediately plugging prizepicks 🤣
Shane needs to chill. Jamie is known on the streets as "Pull up Jamie"💥💥💥
If someone lends you money, you owe that person the money leant plain and simple. Asking for interest or half of the possible winnings is shady af, and that person is not your friend, and that makes you their bitch.
25% is what he gets period. Pull that up
Don't ever get into a partnership with Jamie. Shane took a risk to back him and was ready to lose his money. Shane should get his share of the winnings, not just get paid back his investment.
Lifelong notre Dame fan, I want to go to a game with Shane
I genuinely thought Jamie was Asian before seeing a pic of him... 😳😬🤣 His 'beef' with Gillis has Tony Soprano & Ralphie at the track vibes... 😂
Taylor Lewan should chill, a kinda rich guy should never try to hang with a mega rich guy in a casino
Jaime is so annoying these days he has gotten so lazy on the show
Y'all did Jamie dirty in the thumbnail. You know what you did.
"French Frie tator tots mmmhmmm" - andrew shultz
You get back what you loan unless terms are set before any outcomes. There’s no debate.
Rogan should pay jamie more
Both millionaires doesn’t
matter how much money you have it’s all about the principle
Jaimie didn’t have the money, got a loan and won. Interest rates are high.
"Alright, I was shitfaced"
For the love of god, fix your haircut.
The indian guy never gambled in his life
Shane shot Jaime the same look Rogan gave him that one time when he interrupted.
Pull up my money, Jamie
Perfect segway into a gambling ad you know
the 3rd reich fade is wild
jaime was right. he is doing you a favor of his positive position. you could say no.
It's not like Jaime is broke though, he just didn't have it on him and didn't want to leave the table to hit the atm. Shane should have just floated him the money and get paid back the minute they left the table.
Jamie gives off automatic skeptic vibes like hes apart of mockingbird or something
Has anybody ever say back just realized the MASSIVE amount of comics that are now top of the game major celebrities JUST BECAUSE THEY WERE ROGANS FRIENDS…..and he kept bringing them on his podcast? Some comics have been so famous and successful that we kind of forget they were introduced to us MANY yrs ago by one ever growing podcast called The Joe Rogan Experience!
That’s why it’s great that rogan opened his own comedy club