Wouldn't Feathers McGraw also be charged for illegal modifications (for stealing the Techno Trousers' controls and making them into a remote control), incrimination (for making Wallace cause trouble), breaking and entering by proxy (for the museum heist), aggravated assault (for holding Gromit at gunpoint), reckless firearm discharge (for shooting up the house), and property damage (for shooting off a door)?
Preston was one of the most unnerving Wallace and Gromit villains, especially when you find out he's a robot dog. Feathers is my favorite of the villains, although I may be biased because I love penguins. Still hoping Animated Courtroom will cover Will Vinton villians [Adventures Of Mark Twain, Rip Van Winkle, California Raisins Sold Out, The California Raisins Show, Claymation Easter, and Claymation Comedy Of Horror], and Laugh O Grams/Alice Comedies characters [Julius The Cat, who although a protagonist does a ton of villian-type stuff, OG Pete when he was a bear, and the one off villains].
Guns are not entirely illegal in the UK, but they’re incredibly strict with what owners can have, and I heavily doubt a revolver is legal in anyway. I forgot the term for when someone buys guns illegally, but I’d definitely charge the penguin for owning it.
I'm British and I can agree with that because we only use them either for hunting (With a licence) and also the army that's about it really last time I checked
So is Victor allowed to own his weapon? Is his weapon legal or more legal than a revolver? I assume it is for hunting, but I just want to double check, and if he can carry it around in public the way he does.
Wallace's transformation into the wererabbit absolutely terrified me as a kid. When I saw the fur appearing on his hands, I immediately got up and left the room. I was even shaking in fear in the other room because I could still hear Wallace's shouts of pain and the noises of his body changing. Also, god damn, these criminals would die in jail before they even finished their years sentences! I know that's the point of life in prison, but jeez...
I would say considering the relative year Wallace and Gromut is set in, guns probably are still legal since it is before the law was passed. But I mean Feathers McGraw probably didn't legally acquire the revolver. Also if we do follow by modern UK law Victor's conduct with a firearm.would have his licenses and rifle taken away.
Dog 1: I’m here because I’m been a bad boy Dog 2: I’m here because I also been a bad boy Dog 1 and 2 : why are you here Preston : I was here because I wasn’t subscribe to animated courtroom Dog 1 and 2 : moves away from Preston Subscribe to animated courtroom
12:23 I like how they're fighting in Sopwith camels and Fokkers,potraying the Sopwith camel being a plane used for the allies (good guys) and the Fokker as the axis (bad guys)
Nah, the old Wallace and Grommets went crazy. We really went from going to the moon to a deceptive criminal, a serial killer and an ai dog genociding sheep for meet
Minor objection: Preston, as a robot, cannot be charged as a criminal. However, whoever built him can be charged with his crimes plus Criminal Negligence for letting a dangerous machine with no qualms about committing homicide run around. Also, you never charged him with stealing the livestock, even if he worked on the farm, he still took them from the property without the owner's permission, and that's a Per head crime, meaning he'd have a charge for every animal taken from the farm and slaughtered.
Victor during this should have been charged with illegal discharge of a firearm as he opens fire multiple times during and he does this in reckless and stupid places where the rounds can easily kill somebody. Also he carries his weapon illegally as, when in public, firearms must be concealed in a case and not brandished or visible, so would lead to his firearm being seized by police.
On Victor's first reckless endangerment charge: he'd just fired the single shot rifle, cleared the chamber and left the action open before muzzling the townspeople. Technically no danger but still poor behaviour when welding a firearm
Surely Wendoline must cop some punishment for knowing what Preston was doing to the livestock, but she could legally argue that she was forced and subdued in to it, deflecting the crime on to Preston. If she didn't cop for it, he must cop for some sort of crime for intimidation surely?
You can get the penguin for fleeing arrest, and probably ignoring a cort summons, Along side evasion. You know given how he's a known thife and wanted. Amd maybe an animal cruelty charge for preston
Feathers McGraw theoretically could have possessed his revolver legally; it seems to be an army surplus Enfield model, which would have still been legal when The Wrong Trousers was produced, and in any case the setting appears to be in the 1960s, so we could theoretically subtract that charge. I would also add a charge of industrial espionage to Preston's charges.
@@AnimatedCourtroom Also, that news paper also mentions that the baker from the beginning is the 12th baker found dead that year, so she likely also took their lives too.
10:36 I would exactly say that was Reckless Endangerment considering while yes his finger was on the trigger. That was a bolt action rifle and his bolt was still open implying that another round wasn’t ready yet. Improper firearms treatment yes, actions that would throw you out of any firearms license training also yes, but the bolt was still open so there wasn another round chambered.
Request: If The Little Mermaid Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes Case 1: Ursula (The Little Mermaid) Case 2: Morgana (The Little Mermaid 2: Return to the Sea) Case 3: Marina Del Rey (The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning) Also, you hit 12K subscribers.
Great Vid, Though, Preston stealing the Knit-O-Matic and rebranding it as his own is Patent Infringement, not Copyright Infringement because the Knit-O-Matic was an invention, not an expression of art. Wallace even said, "I've got patents pending on that." The name "Knit-O-Matic" that he kept though constitutes Trademark Infringement because it was what Wallace called his product.
Victor also sabotaged the prize trophy for the vegetable contest to make his final bullet. Due to the fact that the movie insists the bullet must be 24 Karats that means the large piece of gold is of significant value, somewhere in the tens of thousands at least. For the damage he knowingly inflicted on this item he no doubt would have an additional fine at the least.
To be fair to the penguin he could have left Wallace at the scene of the crime and gotten away scot free. I do not think the sheep belong to Preston and the fields might have been privately owned so thats trespassing, theft of property (the sheep) not to mention the lass being coerced into helping.
Hey, I know absolutely nothing about the law in the UK, but when Victor tried to shoot the rabbit in the first crime, wouldnt addictional jail time be given for use of a fire arm?
Firearms aren't completely illegal just heavily restricted, most guns used for hunting are allowed with the right permits which Victor presumably has, the revolver that Feathers McGraw (the penguin) had however would be illegal to own
4:15 That's not breaking and entering if Preston didn't break the vent open. That would be trespassing 12:48 We not going to talk about how Victor Quartermaine's dog(forgot his name) just took money out of the wallet before continuing to fight Gromit?
I've already done videos on these guys, but you did miss some stuff. Also Piella doesn't commit second degree murder against Wallace, she intentionally wanted a "Bakers Dozen" and Wallace was her last victim, pretty sure it's first.
Gromit:Don’t you dare kidnap my friend Feather McGraw: stick'em up🔫 Gromit: hey I don’t want any trouble. I’m going to the closet. I’m going in the closet. Feather McGraw : that’s why I thought
Oh just so you animated court guy you might want to update Feathers McGraw prison sentence in December or something because Aardman making a new movie coming out this winter with him as the bad guy
I’m confused why at 12:45 it was considered animal crucially? It was a comedy film and can’t blame for this I feel like this would lead to (maby)-1 seconds
The USA is more lenient on gun laws, but even here in America the stuff that hunter from the warerabbit would have his guns confiscated because he was he was shooting in a very crowded area, where even shooting in city limits is illegal
Hello Animated Courtroom, please make a video about the villains from the Ninjago cartoon series, especially Samukai, Lord Garmadon and Pythor. Since the events of the animated series take place in a country that resembles Japan, the Japanese criminal code must also be taken into account here.
@@Seven-h-kun And this is not for one issue in the cases against the villains of Ninjago, because there are so many of them that the proceedings of the case will drag on.
☕I now have a Buy Me A Coffee page on which you can support me :D
www.buymeacoffee.com/animatedcourtroom
Feathers McGraw is back in a new movie this winter
Wouldn't Feathers McGraw also be charged for illegal modifications (for stealing the Techno Trousers' controls and making them into a remote control), incrimination (for making Wallace cause trouble), breaking and entering by proxy (for the museum heist), aggravated assault (for holding Gromit at gunpoint), reckless firearm discharge (for shooting up the house), and property damage (for shooting off a door)?
No doubt the list will grow with Vengeance Most Fowl.
“Preston… is a cyborg dog”
Wallace: Oh fu-
😂😂😂 lol, that made me laugh when I watched the film when I was little
Wallace: Cyber what?
Wendoline: A ROBOT!
Gromit: i have rolling pin and im gonna beat ur a$$
Penguin: and i have a gun
Gromit: whoa chill were all chill
2:48
Preston used to scare me as a kid, especially in his robot form
Same
Preston was one of the most unnerving Wallace and Gromit villains, especially when you find out he's a robot dog. Feathers is my favorite of the villains, although I may be biased because I love penguins. Still hoping Animated Courtroom will cover Will Vinton villians [Adventures Of Mark Twain, Rip Van Winkle, California Raisins Sold Out, The California Raisins Show, Claymation Easter, and Claymation Comedy Of Horror], and Laugh O Grams/Alice Comedies characters [Julius The Cat, who although a protagonist does a ton of villian-type stuff, OG Pete when he was a bear, and the one off villains].
Guns are not entirely illegal in the UK, but they’re incredibly strict with what owners can have, and I heavily doubt a revolver is legal in anyway. I forgot the term for when someone buys guns illegally, but I’d definitely charge the penguin for owning it.
I'm British and I can agree with that because we only use them either for hunting (With a licence) and also the army that's about it really last time I checked
@@JokerMaskVidsAnd armed police
@logiebogieboocurr5539 not going to lie I don't see them around as much where I live in Britain so kinda forgot about then
So is Victor allowed to own his weapon? Is his weapon legal or more legal than a revolver? I assume it is for hunting, but I just want to double check, and if he can carry it around in public the way he does.
A revolver is legal but only in certain circumstances
Anyone else only really notice now how dark the Wallace & Gromit movies were?
And I thought the Were rabbit was dark
Like that one movie and the villain got eaten by crocodiles I think when she landed in a zoo
@@Melon-f91 yeah! And she was a Serial Killer.
Well that’s because these films were made in the 1990s and 2000s so they didn’t really have good lighting back then I think
@@marylps500 oh yeah! that certainly added to it.
I'm still confused about the Penguins trespassing because he technically didn't do it himself, he made Wallace do it, but he was controlling Wallace.
He manipulated wallace trousers
@@shuaibyaslam4channer I know. But still the penguin isn't technically trespassing, Wallace is.
Forcing a kidnapped person to do a crime makes the penguin get the charge instead of Wallace
@@ivanariel98 oh okay, now I understand.
@@lrcronk9874wrong
Wallace's transformation into the wererabbit absolutely terrified me as a kid. When I saw the fur appearing on his hands, I immediately got up and left the room. I was even shaking in fear in the other room because I could still hear Wallace's shouts of pain and the noises of his body changing. Also, god damn, these criminals would die in jail before they even finished their years sentences! I know that's the point of life in prison, but jeez...
Same. I was only 9 when I watched it. Freaked me out
Piella should've had 12 life sentences since the death penalty in the UK was outlawed
If she was caught alive instead of being eaten alive by those crocodiles.
I would say considering the relative year Wallace and Gromut is set in, guns probably are still legal since it is before the law was passed. But I mean Feathers McGraw probably didn't legally acquire the revolver.
Also if we do follow by modern UK law Victor's conduct with a firearm.would have his licenses and rifle taken away.
Dog 1: I’m here because I’m been a bad boy
Dog 2: I’m here because I also been a bad boy
Dog 1 and 2 : why are you here
Preston : I was here because I wasn’t subscribe to animated courtroom
Dog 1 and 2 : moves away from Preston
Subscribe to animated courtroom
To be fair, two of these villains won't be seeing any of that jail time, on account of the mincer and the crocodiles
And McGraw will likely commit a multitude of new crimes by the end of Vengeance Most Fowl.
I guess they're trying to hint at a sequel with the penguin again.
Yep it is apparently coming this Christmas
This comment aged well.
Bro predicted the future
12:23 I like how they're fighting in Sopwith camels and Fokkers,potraying the Sopwith camel being a plane used for the allies (good guys) and the Fokker as the axis (bad guys)
Nah, the old Wallace and Grommets went crazy. We really went from going to the moon to a deceptive criminal, a serial killer and an ai dog genociding sheep for meet
What about a rabbit hunter?
@@corkscrew071 That was later but, yes, that guy was also bat-shit insane
@@Pyro03333 yeah very very insane. I love Wallace and Gromit.
6:23 Aardman- Ok we set the dog up in the machine but we don’t want to kill the killer.
Employee- Sir have you heard about a film called terminator.
The penguin has a real vibe like the chicken of courage the cowardly dog.
Wallace and Gromit is one of my favourite childhood series, and this has made my day. You have earned a brand new sub!
“I will charge the penguin.”
-Jason Courtroom, 2024
Minor objection: Preston, as a robot, cannot be charged as a criminal. However, whoever built him can be charged with his crimes plus Criminal Negligence for letting a dangerous machine with no qualms about committing homicide run around.
Also, you never charged him with stealing the livestock, even if he worked on the farm, he still took them from the property without the owner's permission, and that's a Per head crime, meaning he'd have a charge for every animal taken from the farm and slaughtered.
But Preston was built by Wendeline's deceased father.
Victor during this should have been charged with illegal discharge of a firearm as he opens fire multiple times during and he does this in reckless and stupid places where the rounds can easily kill somebody. Also he carries his weapon illegally as, when in public, firearms must be concealed in a case and not brandished or visible, so would lead to his firearm being seized by police.
On Victor's first reckless endangerment charge: he'd just fired the single shot rifle, cleared the chamber and left the action open before muzzling the townspeople. Technically no danger but still poor behaviour when welding a firearm
If he was a “Lordship” as Wallace addressed him, would he lose his title and/or seat in the House of Lords?
Nice detail by replacing the usual U.S Dollar to Pound because some of the movies took place in the UK.
Even if im an American
U mean all of the movies took place in the uk
I'm British so it's a particularly nice detail to me
This just shows me I need to see more Wallace and gromit, the only thing I've seen is the wererabbit movie and that was child friendly
Piella should have gotten 1 more charge at the end there for committing a crime directly infront of its signage, that being for feeding the Crocodiles
Surely Wendoline must cop some punishment for knowing what Preston was doing to the livestock, but she could legally argue that she was forced and subdued in to it, deflecting the crime on to Preston. If she didn't cop for it, he must cop for some sort of crime for intimidation surely?
About Preston, I thought it'd be patent infringement, not copyright infringement.
You can get the penguin for fleeing arrest, and probably ignoring a cort summons, Along side evasion. You know given how he's a known thife and wanted.
Amd maybe an animal cruelty charge for preston
6:14 let’s see how you like to be in the vacuum, Preston. 6:33 😂 6:40 good kick, Gromit! 6:47 😅
Feathers McGraw theoretically could have possessed his revolver legally; it seems to be an army surplus Enfield model, which would have still been legal when The Wrong Trousers was produced, and in any case the setting appears to be in the 1960s, so we could theoretically subtract that charge.
I would also add a charge of industrial espionage to Preston's charges.
2:48 Gromit: hand me that remote
Mcgraw: you mean this remote?
Gromit: WOAH!!!!
Uhhh. Animated Courtroom? You forgot wallace and Gromit's first Rver Foe/Villain: The Cooker from the 89' Film "Wallace and Gromit: A Grand Day out"
I never get tired of these vids :)
You forgot that Piella fed the Zoo's Crocodile,isn't that illegal since it's not her crocodile ??
That doesn't really matter cause she's already dead
3:45
And that's not counting Project Zoo.
Shouldn’t Piella Bakewell of had the false imprisonment from locking Gromit and the other dog away?
Maybe yeah🤔
@@AnimatedCourtroom
Also, that news paper also mentions that the baker from the beginning is the 12th baker found dead that year, so she likely also took their lives too.
1:01 trespassing is not illegal in the UK. It is a civil matter.
McGraw kidnapped Wallace in a unusual way
Piella is the only villain to die as Preston was rebuilt at the end of close shave
11:15 Glitch here.
Fun fact: At the end of Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget, Feathers McGraw made a brief cameo in the background.
Preston points off his license
Me: how he a dog he doesn’t even have a license
I thought the same! But hes driving the entire film😅😆
@@AnimatedCourtroom dang well that’s explains everything
Best youtuber
What….. where did McGraw gat a GUN!? HOW DID HE!!!????
10:36 I would exactly say that was Reckless Endangerment considering while yes his finger was on the trigger. That was a bolt action rifle and his bolt was still open implying that another round wasn’t ready yet. Improper firearms treatment yes, actions that would throw you out of any firearms license training also yes, but the bolt was still open so there wasn another round chambered.
Why will you be death sentenced for serial murder? You'll just get a life sentence
Wallace and Gromit Characters Sorted into their Hogwarts Houses:
Gryffindor 🦁🟥💛 🗡️🤺🦸🏻🦸🏻♀️ - Gromit 🐕, Fluffles 🐩, The Villagers and Shaun 🐑.
Hufflepuff 🦡🟨⬛ 💁🏻💁🏻♀️ - Wendolene Ramsbottom.
Ravenclaw 🦅🟦🥉🤓💡🧑🏻🔬👩🏻🔬🧑🏻💻👩🏻💻🤨🧐 - PC Albert MackIntosh Wallace, Baker Bob, Hutch, Reverend Clement Hedges and Campanula Tottington.
Slytherin 🐍🟩🥈😈 - Victor QuarterMaine, Phillip, Feathers McGraw 🐧, Piella Bakewell 👱🏻♀️, The Cooker & Preston the Robot Dog.
Request: If The Little Mermaid Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes
Case 1: Ursula (The Little Mermaid)
Case 2: Morgana (The Little Mermaid 2: Return to the Sea)
Case 3: Marina Del Rey (The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning)
Also, you hit 12K subscribers.
🥳🥳
@@AnimatedCourtroom Thanks!
Great Vid,
Though, Preston stealing the Knit-O-Matic and rebranding it as his own is Patent Infringement, not Copyright Infringement because the Knit-O-Matic was an invention, not an expression of art. Wallace even said, "I've got patents pending on that." The name "Knit-O-Matic" that he kept though constitutes Trademark Infringement because it was what Wallace called his product.
The issue with Preston is that he is a robot. Plus the original creator of him is already dead. But he malfuncted. Got killed and then rebuilt 😵💫
Preston then served as the right hand dog of Rhett Leicester the main villain of 'The Curse of Ramsbottom' comic.
Victor also sabotaged the prize trophy for the vegetable contest to make his final bullet. Due to the fact that the movie insists the bullet must be 24 Karats that means the large piece of gold is of significant value, somewhere in the tens of thousands at least. For the damage he knowingly inflicted on this item he no doubt would have an additional fine at the least.
Victor would obviously lose his title and/or seat in the House of Lords.
I feel like some food-related health violations probably took place in there somewhere
Did anyone else think of the terminator when she said cyber dog
Moi
To be fair to the penguin he could have left Wallace at the scene of the crime and gotten away scot free.
I do not think the sheep belong to Preston and the fields might have been privately owned so thats trespassing, theft of property (the sheep) not to mention the lass being coerced into helping.
In Chicken Run 2, Feathers McGraw makes a cameo appearance at the end of the film, in the final scene.
I love he gave false imprisonment to victor for pinning back her hair
Also assault should be there
Can you please do, once Vengeance Most Fowl arrives, do a video covering Feathers’ crimes in that, and those of The Cooker from A Grand Day Out?
Piella Bakewell started with murder. Yep a kids show.
I like victor quartermines bri'ish voice
2:55 guns are in fact Legal in the UK they are just heavily restricted compared to the US. However Pistols and Revolvers are Illegal
I remember seeing the moment when the window turned around and felt such vertigo.
Hey, I know absolutely nothing about the law in the UK, but when Victor tried to shoot the rabbit in the first crime, wouldnt addictional jail time be given for use of a fire arm?
Firearms aren't completely illegal just heavily restricted, most guns used for hunting are allowed with the right permits which Victor presumably has, the revolver that Feathers McGraw (the penguin) had however would be illegal to own
I’m not sure if it’s just me but Preston scared the fuck out of me when I was a kid
Victor was like seriously why😑
Attempted murder for the penguin for shooting at Gromit with clear intent to kill!
Back in 1950s, Piella would have been introduced to Mr. Pierrepoint.
4:15 That's not breaking and entering if Preston didn't break the vent open. That would be trespassing
12:48 We not going to talk about how Victor Quartermaine's dog(forgot his name) just took money out of the wallet before continuing to fight Gromit?
Prepare yourself animated courtroom because feathers McGraw is coming back in December in a new Wallace and gromit movie
Wait is Wallace and gromit in the same universe as Shawn the sheep
I do have to question the legitimacy of charging Victor with false imprisonment for locking up Gromit as he is a dog.
It would presumably be animal cruelty
He wasnt called Feathers it was the newspaper who give him the name.
0:02 6’11 FOOT CHICKEN
I've already done videos on these guys, but you did miss some stuff. Also Piella doesn't commit second degree murder against Wallace, she intentionally wanted a "Bakers Dozen" and Wallace was her last victim, pretty sure it's first.
Could be true! To me i always think the attenpt itself was ir premeditated or not or is it on the spot improvising
This is amazing and kinda funny
I love your video's
Gromit:Don’t you dare kidnap my friend
Feather McGraw: stick'em up🔫
Gromit: hey I don’t want any trouble. I’m going to the closet. I’m going in the closet.
Feather McGraw : that’s why I thought
Preston: I am terminator dog now
Gromit: oh frick
“What a bad boy.”
actually, piella killed 12 bakers
Oh just so you animated court guy you might want to update Feathers McGraw prison sentence in December or something because Aardman making a new movie coming out this winter with him as the bad guy
Cool video
:D
How does a dog fighting a dog count as animal cruelty when it's a natrual accuring thing
Preston is a cyberdog, so shouldnt all blame fall on whoever created him?
6:29 fnaf endskeleton
I love his videos
10:51
I’m confused why at 12:45 it was considered animal crucially? It was a comedy film and can’t blame for this
I feel like this would lead to (maby)-1 seconds
You forgot about the machine from the moon. It would be good in that list.
victor should also be charged for coercion
Preston and Piella technically served that death sentence
Capital punishment is illegal btw.
Even for extreme circumstances like a serial killer?
The USA is more lenient on gun laws, but even here in America the stuff that hunter from the warerabbit would have his guns confiscated because he was he was shooting in a very crowded area, where even shooting in city limits is illegal
Guns are legal in the uk it’s just they are under very VERY strict laws
OKAY, WHO GAVE THE PENGIUN A GUN?
The dog in the wererabbit movie was driving a nazi plane when he was chasing gromit💀
These films were my child hood
Hello Animated Courtroom, please make a video about the villains from the Ninjago cartoon series, especially Samukai, Lord Garmadon and Pythor. Since the events of the animated series take place in a country that resembles Japan, the Japanese criminal code must also be taken into account here.
Bro about to watch 15 seasons, 2 specials and sequel series that is currently 2 seasons (well the second half of season 2 isn't out yet)
@@Seven-h-kun And this is not for one issue in the cases against the villains of Ninjago, because there are so many of them that the proceedings of the case will drag on.
i already knew the crimes that they committed
First and nice video