1:39 I believe Reckless Endangerment would also be involved here, since Shaw is trying to shoot both Boog and Elliot simultaneously while in the middle of an out of control crowd. He could’ve potentially accidentally killed anyone if they got in the way of his gun, and that would also added an involuntary manslaughter charge as well.
I like how a tiny dog has a more severe sentence than a crazed hunter with a gun. It's the difference between 10.25 years and 4 life sentences plus 19.6 years. On top of the other charges as well.
the Hunter was mostly man vs animal crime the tiny dog committed animal vs animal crimes which are equally as punishable as a man vs man crime since their all animals the dog was pretty innocent up until he attempted to murder other animals
Honestly, with Shaw at least, I believe you missed more than a few crimes… to cite all I found… Scene 1.) Shaw is not only seen recklessly driving, but he also nearly runs over two people, INCLUDING A CHILD (Reckless Endangerment x2 with one being a child), and then we can cite him for reckless use of a firearm (Rifle is being used as a guitar prop, so who knows where that rifle is pointing… especially considering we can assume it’s locked and loaded.), but we can also cite him for Perjury (Lied to Officer Gordy about how Elliot got on that hood), Poaching (You got it!) and another Reckless Driving (Reality about how Elliot got on that hood). Scene 2.) We can cite him with Reckless use of a firearm (again) due to him trying to fire his rifle in a populated area. Scene 3.) Alongside Reckless Driving, we also, once again, got Reckless Endangerment x2, one of which again has a child modifier. (Not counting the vehicle he almost hit, as Elliot caused that near miss, and Shawn stopped before he could be a threat) Scene 4.) I am assuming Shaw had no approval to be there at all in the first place, as this is most likely a paid event, and Shaw cannot use the argument of defending the public both due to his reckless use of his rifle and how he was there BEFORE the screaming and panic set in. Then he takes aim in a crowded space with people running around who can easily get in the way, meaning he’s flagging countless people AS WELL AS BETH due to her being behind Elliot and Boog, meaning if he got an accurate shot off, he actually would have shot all three in the head. This would tack on Trespassing, and Reckless Use of a Firearm, on top of Fleeing and Eluding an Officer. Scene 5.) You got the right image, as he’s driving like a psychopath who got his license out of a rotten cereal box that was advertising a chance to get one of those toy MIB ID cards inside it. Scene 6.) Again, the same right idea Scene 7.) If you REALLY want to bring the hammer down on this guy, you can also tack on reckless use of a firearm on top of Poaching, as that was such an extreme range and, judging from the power behind that round, he could easily have hit anything beyond Boog and Elliot… including another human who was camping in the woods. And I highly doubt he could have known what was beyond his target with him over-penetrating a tree to attempt to headshot Boog. Scene 8.) Again, reckless use of a firearm could be argued here. He’s in an unsafe environment generated by the environment rather than any of the wildlife around him. So he had no reason to fire his rifle at any point. What he should have been doing was looking for some way to escape this situation with a much higher chance of survival… and this is ignoring the factors that make me question his mental health. Scene 9.) I have nothing to add in this circumstance. Scene 10.) Depending on where you are, I’m assuming you can tack on additional charges, but i cannot say for sure. Still, because of how wild this is, at most, I can say the entire Hunting Community would be shaming him to no end, worse than the guy who got too excited over his poor execution of hunting a bear with a throwing spear. So Poaching will have to do. Additional charges I got: Reckless Endangerment x5 (x2 with child modifiers), Reckless Use of a Firearm x5, Perjury, Reckless Driving x2, Trespassing, Fleeing and Eluding a LEO… and whatever damages Beth cites him for in Civil Court for flagging her indirectly via aiming through Boog and Elliot, and if she catches wind of it, his role leading up to the incident and the resulting closure of the attraction and its loss of income.
How about If Madagascar Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes? Case 1: Makunga (Madagascar Escape 2 Africa) Case 2: Chantel DuBois (Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted) Case 3: Dave (Penguins of Madagascar)
@@spencerstark6420I feel like the fossas are more like simple predators hunting for food rather than actually committing evil acts despite being sadistic by terrorizing the lemurs before eating them.
I hope you'll ever do "FPS game villains if they were charged for their crimes". I wonder how many consecutive death penalties Tumulus Samael would get.
I also count it as self defense, but since there was no sentence, i wanted to let the you guys know he has not picked up his license, for what happens after :)
If Shaw never went to a shop with the truck it would warrant the ticket but I never took note of if his truck got fixed since it sank later anyway but he did almost hit some people on multiple occasions with his unprofessional driving and improper hunting practices like in the town but I do remember he has also harassed the lady who raised Boog multiple times and tried to incite her to anger. He also should have got public endangerment on his record since he did drive with intent to kill when he saw Elliot.
I just notice few things since watching this as a kid. 1. He needs at least 45-70 Gov to take on a bear that size (maybe defined by the tree hole. But 2. WHY IS HIS RIFLE PUMP ACTION
What if Shaun The Sheep villains (including the llamas from The Farmer’s Llamas) were charged for their crimes? What if Douche from Sausage Party were charged for his crimes? What if Horrid Henry (one of my MOST HATED 2000s cartoon characters) were charged for his crimes? (Per season) What if Lilo & Stitch villains were charged for their crimes? What if Simpsons villains were charged for their crimes?
Shaws escaping lawful custody and denying arrest charge I feel should be re-established or maybe removed. The sheriff hadn’t actually announced the punishment for shooting his rifle so for all we know he could’ve believed it was a fine or a misdemeanour and ran off. The sheriff also hadn’t said directly that he was under arrest until Shaw was already gone, so it might not be a charge?
I would argue that he also should have a charge of public carrying without a license i do recognize that the game warden is not too concerned about it till he’s pointing it at things he aught not to.
It’s funny how my brain works. I do not care at all for the open season series and yet when I saw this while I was browsing on my TV it immediately caught me and I wanted to know who did the most crime
Hey bro I have question for you What if someone robber enters in my house then I saw that dude I pick up sniper rifle then robber pull out pistol points to me then I accidentally kill me so (at this time i am going to jail)
This scares me with how specific it is. Anyways, Mongolian law shouldn't be _too_ different, so it's still self defense if he shoots first as he had an intent to kill. But I'd recommend doing research on this.
And reckless endangerment for messing around with his gun and slamming the butt stock on the floor that's a good way to set the gun off and he has poor trigger discipline, he constantly has his finger on the trigger when he is not supposed too
☕I now have a Buy Me A Coffee page on which you can support me :D
www.buymeacoffee.com/animatedcourtroom
1:39
I believe Reckless Endangerment would also be involved here, since Shaw is trying to shoot both Boog and Elliot simultaneously while in the middle of an out of control crowd. He could’ve potentially accidentally killed anyone if they got in the way of his gun, and that would also added an involuntary manslaughter charge as well.
He was already placed under arrest by a police officer for that but ran away so the charge became escaping from arrest instead
@@aerodynamiccow3597
That makes sense to be honest, but a reckless endangerment charge would still apply here.
Same
yes I agree, but I still give Shaw the respect he deserves, bro faced a bear and survived
Jesus loves you very much! Have a great day/night!
"Yeah, Shaw, I understand we're locking you up for little over 10 years for your crimes, but we still gotta charge you for that Marshmallow"
1:04 I love how Shaw is about to start shooting a fleeing animal in a built up area and the 1st thing we adress is the headlight
I like how a tiny dog has a more severe sentence than a crazed hunter with a gun. It's the difference between 10.25 years and 4 life sentences plus 19.6 years. On top of the other charges as well.
the Hunter was mostly man vs animal crime
the tiny dog committed animal vs animal crimes
which are equally as punishable as a man vs man crime since their all animals
the dog was pretty innocent up until he attempted to murder other animals
In parts of America having and carrying a gun is not crazy at all. Its how he behaved with it that was the issue...
You forgot to charge shaw for shooting in town and reckless use of a firearm. That could get his gun confiscated and disqualified from gun ownership
This man endangered people and he was trying to kill animals before hunting season so he’s a lunatic and a poacher
9:38 he is the most chill open season minion ive seen
Well in case you forgot, Shaw came back in Open Season Scared Silly to take his revenge on Booge and Eliot.
PLEASE DON'T WATCH IT. IT'S THE ONLY ONE I REFUSED TO FINISH.
The movie is trash but ironically, it feels more like an actual sequel than the other two.
I don't think anybody should have to watch Scared Silly.
Besides we don't know what happened before that movie, he could've been open season at the time and Shaw got his hunting licence
I know right
Bro marshmallow theft had me laughing
$2 fine😂
Honestly, with Shaw at least, I believe you missed more than a few crimes… to cite all I found…
Scene 1.) Shaw is not only seen recklessly driving, but he also nearly runs over two people, INCLUDING A CHILD (Reckless Endangerment x2 with one being a child), and then we can cite him for reckless use of a firearm (Rifle is being used as a guitar prop, so who knows where that rifle is pointing… especially considering we can assume it’s locked and loaded.), but we can also cite him for Perjury (Lied to Officer Gordy about how Elliot got on that hood), Poaching (You got it!) and another Reckless Driving (Reality about how Elliot got on that hood).
Scene 2.) We can cite him with Reckless use of a firearm (again) due to him trying to fire his rifle in a populated area.
Scene 3.) Alongside Reckless Driving, we also, once again, got Reckless Endangerment x2, one of which again has a child modifier. (Not counting the vehicle he almost hit, as Elliot caused that near miss, and Shawn stopped before he could be a threat)
Scene 4.) I am assuming Shaw had no approval to be there at all in the first place, as this is most likely a paid event, and Shaw cannot use the argument of defending the public both due to his reckless use of his rifle and how he was there BEFORE the screaming and panic set in. Then he takes aim in a crowded space with people running around who can easily get in the way, meaning he’s flagging countless people AS WELL AS BETH due to her being behind Elliot and Boog, meaning if he got an accurate shot off, he actually would have shot all three in the head. This would tack on Trespassing, and Reckless Use of a Firearm, on top of Fleeing and Eluding an Officer.
Scene 5.) You got the right image, as he’s driving like a psychopath who got his license out of a rotten cereal box that was advertising a chance to get one of those toy MIB ID cards inside it.
Scene 6.) Again, the same right idea
Scene 7.) If you REALLY want to bring the hammer down on this guy, you can also tack on reckless use of a firearm on top of Poaching, as that was such an extreme range and, judging from the power behind that round, he could easily have hit anything beyond Boog and Elliot… including another human who was camping in the woods. And I highly doubt he could have known what was beyond his target with him over-penetrating a tree to attempt to headshot Boog.
Scene 8.) Again, reckless use of a firearm could be argued here. He’s in an unsafe environment generated by the environment rather than any of the wildlife around him. So he had no reason to fire his rifle at any point. What he should have been doing was looking for some way to escape this situation with a much higher chance of survival… and this is ignoring the factors that make me question his mental health.
Scene 9.) I have nothing to add in this circumstance.
Scene 10.) Depending on where you are, I’m assuming you can tack on additional charges, but i cannot say for sure. Still, because of how wild this is, at most, I can say the entire Hunting Community would be shaming him to no end, worse than the guy who got too excited over his poor execution of hunting a bear with a throwing spear. So Poaching will have to do.
Additional charges I got: Reckless Endangerment x5 (x2 with child modifiers), Reckless Use of a Firearm x5, Perjury, Reckless Driving x2, Trespassing, Fleeing and Eluding a LEO… and whatever damages Beth cites him for in Civil Court for flagging her indirectly via aiming through Boog and Elliot, and if she catches wind of it, his role leading up to the incident and the resulting closure of the attraction and its loss of income.
Can't he also get for assault from shoving the people in scene 4?
@@Aliacatlover oh yeah, yup he can.
How about If Madagascar Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes?
Case 1: Makunga (Madagascar Escape 2 Africa)
Case 2: Chantel DuBois (Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted)
Case 3: Dave (Penguins of Madagascar)
Chantel might get a 30 year sentence. Or more
And the foosas
@@spencerstark6420I feel like the fossas are more like simple predators hunting for food rather than actually committing evil acts despite being sadistic by terrorizing the lemurs before eating them.
@@josephandrews7638 true but they also tried to eat Marty
I hope you'll ever do "FPS game villains if they were charged for their crimes".
I wonder how many consecutive death penalties Tumulus Samael would get.
I realized I made a grammar mistake but I can't edit my comment or I lose the heart... DAMMIT
I wonder how many penalties that Garmantuous would get.
3:04 Marshmallow theft? That dude should be put in maximum security!
I believe it could be argued that a wild animal that broke into your home as self-defense rather than hunting without a license
I also count it as self defense, but since there was no sentence, i wanted to let the you guys know he has not picked up his license, for what happens after :)
Thank you for including marshmallow theft 😂
9:15 Geez What A Hothead
😂
R.i.p Shaw's pickup chevy truck. I loved his truck.
“He ran in front of my truck”
10:55 First murder charge of the video
Edit: 15:42 Damn. Three crimes, and ends up with a worse sentence than Shaw.
Gary Sinise did an amazing job voicing Shaw
4:46 😂😂😂😂 that scene kills me every time 😂😂😂
If Shaw never went to a shop with the truck it would warrant the ticket but I never took note of if his truck got fixed since it sank later anyway but he did almost hit some people on multiple occasions with his unprofessional driving and improper hunting practices like in the town but I do remember he has also harassed the lady who raised Boog multiple times and tried to incite her to anger. He also should have got public endangerment on his record since he did drive with intent to kill when he saw Elliot.
If you ask me, Shar’s been watching too much Planet of The Apes 🦍
You should do if Video game movie villains were charged for their crimes
Bowser: aw hell naw
King dice is quaking in his tailcoat
Horror game villains
Robotnik would be an interesting once since he was contracted by and following orders from the Government for the first movie
@@aerodynamiccow3597 in the second movie he says he plans to enslave humanity...yeah that is a death sentence
I’m dead the boom sound effect😂😂😂😂😂
2:12 had me dying, like why did he even start tweaking
ORDER! ORDER IN THE COURT!
Can I get a number five number six with the number 8 a big Coke and a jumbo sized number 17-
@@V1_ULTRAKILL3535 that'll be 29.99 on the next window
@@Shadow9-5 um, do- do you accept blood?
@@V1_ULTRAKILL3535 why yes sir or ma'am, that'll be 12 gallons of blood in the next window
@@Shadow9-5 ok
Shaw is the Gaston and Clayton of Open Season
I just notice few things since watching this as a kid. 1. He needs at least 45-70 Gov to take on a bear that size (maybe defined by the tree hole. But 2. WHY IS HIS RIFLE PUMP ACTION
Honestly, shaw and Doug were the least antagonistic of the three
“Ooh it’s terrible yet wonderful at the same time! It’s like freedom in a cup!”
For some reason I read “life sentence” at the end for doug as “death sentence” and it was really funny
But hes chill actually got me laughing
"Buttermilk,.. biscuit" 😂😂😂😂
What if Shaun The Sheep villains (including the llamas from The Farmer’s Llamas) were charged for their crimes?
What if Douche from Sausage Party were charged for his crimes?
What if Horrid Henry (one of my MOST HATED 2000s cartoon characters) were charged for his crimes? (Per season)
What if Lilo & Stitch villains were charged for their crimes?
What if Simpsons villains were charged for their crimes?
0:09 I see that scratch on the Open Season DVD
3:04 Marshmallow theft = $2? lol Are you sure about that one? lol
Fun fact: Shaw is played by Actor Gary Sinise who was known for being Lieutenant Dan in Forrest Gump
I'm not going to lie I have never watched open season before😂
I know right 😂😂😂😂
I have
Ive seen the first 2 but not 3 or scared silly
Tip: Only watch the first one, the series, and pretend the sequels don't exist.
Works for me.
@@TunaBear64 in my opinion:
Open Season: awesome
Open Season 2: good
Open Season 3: boring
Open Season Scared Silly: pure trash
Thank God, he added that marshmallow
Shaws escaping lawful custody and denying arrest charge I feel should be re-established or maybe removed.
The sheriff hadn’t actually announced the punishment for shooting his rifle so for all we know he could’ve believed it was a fine or a misdemeanour and ran off. The sheriff also hadn’t said directly that he was under arrest until Shaw was already gone, so it might not be a charge?
shaw actually had two more reckless driving charges at the beginning of the movie
also you forgot the charges against shaw in the halloween movie
1:11 to be fair, that light just got broken.
Finally Fifi got what he deserved
Me mistaking a kid for a traffic cone: 0:29 1:27
15:41 You forgot identity theft
Marshmallow theft = death sentence
“So lobobobobobibobobo!”
-the buck
You forgot the 2 Canadians from Open Season 4. They are Villains too.
Shaw is the definition of a classic Disney villain. Batshit crazy and devoted to killing the protagonist
Shaw would also have something along the lines of discharging a firearm in public, brandishing a firearm, illegal hunting. (With a truck)
I’d say with a good lawyer, shae’s actions could be seen as mentally I’ll or more as a good action sooo
You forgot the case that the sheriff give shaw a ticket and he just crumble it and throw in the ground
Did shaw assassinate MLK?!?!?!?😱 same rifle, the Remington 760 Gamemaster.🤔
Animated courtrooms I have some ideas like if rdr and Wolfenstein characters were charged for there crime
I would argue that he also should have a charge of public carrying without a license i do recognize that the game warden is not too concerned about it till he’s pointing it at things he aught not to.
5:18 yeah 2006 should not be shaw’s year
Shaw was the only sane person in that movie
True, he knew what was going on.
A
i think for shaw, maybe just.. skip jail and go straight to hospitalization. he's not okay 😭get that man psychiatric help bruv
I fink shaw should have a litering charge because that toothpick fell out of his mouth and he didn't throw it away
I think Fifi is missing a grand theft auto charge.
he's one of them have seen the Shaw
6:32 IM GOING TO BE BALD?! OK I SUBSCRIBE JUST DONT MAKE ME BALD!
Isn’t it also reckless endangerment when Shaw was driving recklessly on the open street and almost hit a car, man, and child?
I want to how shaw is not appented murder? And I was really confused why boog breathing so hardly
It’s funny how my brain works. I do not care at all for the open season series and yet when I saw this while I was browsing on my TV it immediately caught me and I wanted to know who did the most crime
Open season 2 Elliot's scream is my favorite part
Nice video and i have watched Open Season before
Wouldn't Shaw get another charge for lying to a comisoned officer along side the poaching
2:30 should also be animal abuse, as he seems to be tightly restraining the dog.
14:50 💀
It’s only a crime if you get caught.
Shaw gives me Trevor Philips vibes XD
Missed the reckless driving when he pulls into the building in the very first few seconds of your video.
Day 2 of requesting if Murder Drones villains were charged for their crimes
Edit : btw,first
Hahah, coming soon, 2 weeks max! I have it high on the list, but its a lot to watch so not sure haha
Wouldn’t Shaw eating The Marshmallow count as Petty Theft?
0:03 You could have gotten Shaw for nearly hitting two people, which is reckless driving
9:24 No one will ever notice
Would Shaw Join Lord Vortech in LEGO Dimension’s
0:05 How come shaw didn't get charged for reckless driving for almost running someone over
I notice someone mentioned that he did that on multiple times.
14:50 without context this looks weird😂
I loved watching this movie :)
Oh and his hands were on the barrel so shaw is in danger of putting a bullet hole through his hands
Shaw looks like Danny Trejo
Shaw giving off Trevor Phillips vibes
Hey bro I have question for you
What if someone robber enters in my house then I saw that dude I pick up sniper rifle then robber pull out pistol points to me then I accidentally kill me so (at this time i am going to jail)
In USA , if someone enters your house, and you end up shooting him, its self defense and you are cleared
@@AnimatedCourtroom oh I see in Mongolia?
This scares me with how specific it is.
Anyways, Mongolian law shouldn't be _too_ different, so it's still self defense if he shoots first as he had an intent to kill. But I'd recommend doing research on this.
@@LordCrate-du8zm I see man
Great video
Glad you enjoyed it!
@@AnimatedCourtroom here's another idea If Spiderman ( Tobey Maguire Spiderman) villans we're charged for their crimes
Seems like you forgot the reckless driving for Shawn right at the start of the video
And reckless endangerment for messing around with his gun and slamming the butt stock on the floor that's a good way to set the gun off and he has poor trigger discipline, he constantly has his finger on the trigger when he is not supposed too
I rlly like watching these movies when in out camping
I love that porcupine character he's extremely funny
Don’t forget to charge Cleo too
1:35 I feel like that should have also given him another poaching charge
I remember Open Season ❤
Shaw wouldn’t get harassment because he thought they needed help so he wouldn’t be charged under the good samaritan act
Fifi should also have hate crimes and animal cruelty charges
You didn't realize that at the beginning of the video shaw commits the crime of reckless driving
it would be interesting if you'd do if the owl house characters were charged for their crime
14:53 ao what the fudge
Marshmallow theft should be life sentence