These Solar Panels Work on Cloudy Days! AuREUS Solar Panels Explained
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 авг 2024
- Check out the Tezos homepage for NFT’s! It is educational, easy to understand, and FUN!
tezos.com/build-play-collect/
For anyone who has solar panels, you know how bad shade or cloudy days can be. That's where this breakthrough solar panel tech comes in, It is called AuREUS Solar panels, and they were invented by a very unlikely hero. Carvey Ehren Maigue, a student at Mapua University in the Philippines, invented the AuREUS concept. As a result, British James Dyson Foundation gave him the first Sustainability Award. But do they actually work, and what drawbacks might there be? We thought these questions deserved a deeper dive on Two Bit da Vinci!
》》》SUPPORT THE SHOW!《《《
Get Our NFT! geni.us/TwoBitNFT
Become a Patron! twobit.link/Patreon
Become a RUclips Member! geni.us/TwoBitMember
One Time Donation: geni.us/PaypalMe
Drone Quotes for Solar ⟫ geni.us/DroneQuote
》》》COMPANY OUTREACH 《《《
Sponsor A Video! sponsors@twobit.media
》》》CONNECT WITH US 《《《
Twitter 》 / twobitdavinci
Facebook 》 / twobitdavinci
Instagram 》 / twobitdavinci
》》》TWO BIT DA VINCI《《《
I'm Ricky, this is Two Bit da Vinci, and if you're interested in learning about the future why it's going to be far more awesome than you think, join us for the ride!
#Solarpanels #aureus #solartech #newtech #howsolarpanelswork #renewableenergy #energy 
Наука
if they pass regular visible light I think the idea of just manufacturing an "addon" for regular panels would work best - like a sheet you install on top of your existing panels
Yes this is what I have thought.
So you cut the panel it in 5mm strip's an turn them 45° would this work like that on the edges?
I think that a a good idea. I would like companies that do produce any panels to figure out how to drop their waste of materials ( I was going to say first but I don’t know if that’s right) they’re loosing tons of product in the production process. It’s a big number idk off the top of my head but look up processed silica and it’s not an efficient thing. Yet. I love innovation and improvement in all this stuff. Gets my mind rolling in random directions haha. (Babbling finished)
I wish videos and articles on these concepts did a better job at making comparisons and tempering expectations of new tech. This concept responds to a given set of circumstances and might be great for certain scenarios, it’s not “better” than current crystalline silicon based solar. Today’s solar panels don’t lose efficiency when it’s cloudy they simply produce less power at a given moment, the day’s energy yield drops as there was less energy available that day…innovations that work well when cloudy or when there is reduced light energy available have limited impacts that need to be weighed against their trade offs, added cost, limited durability etc. I’m impressed by these innovations, this person has a great future. I like these videos but I’d like to point out that today’s solar and wind energy is already cheaper than coal! Get your systems installed. (I admit intermittency needs to be managed but time of use cost and storage can manage this)
Well this doesn't replace solar panels, it just sits on top of them... it fluoresces in UV, giving out extra visible light for the solar panel to absorb... at least, that's how I understood it, maybe I missed something.
There are several RUclips channels like this. They simply take a nascent technology, regurgitate the marketing BS, fail to offer any genuine comparison and then tag on their sponsor's message. It's technologic click bait for the masses in all but name.
@@annoloki that is what I understood too, also from another video I just watched about this.
@@annoloki But can the loss from the cover panel ever make up for the extra energy obtained from UV? I don't see how it can. The total energy in UV that can be used (limited by total UV irradiance then the stokes shift) is less than the loss of visible light from internal reflection and absorption. But I am rusty - feel free to contradict me with some more solid numbers.
It seems like this would be the perfect canidate for the micro manufacturing movement.
As in all technology, it's just a matter of time until newer technology comes along to produce a more efficient way to solve the problem.
Reminds me of the issues related to OPV (organic PV) and BIPV (building integrated PV). These haven't really taken off. As mentioned in the video, there are the issues of efficiency, and cost. Also, lifetime (which is also an issue with perovskites). The UV angle is interesting. But we'll see.
I doubt very much on efficiency. Lifetime can be beaten with synthetic fluorescent materials. Use of vegetables makes me think it is all fraud.
what a great idea. Surely you could layer them over an existing panel to create two way energy generation?
Definitely not. The loss in visible light generation will more than the gain from the UV.
If it doesn't reduce the regular light capture too much. Seems like it would reduce regular efficiency more than it picks up from UV light.
I think this would only be useful to add in areas that don't get direct sun very often and don't need much power.. ie cities where it's cloudy most of the year.
I hope it works. If anything, we need many such off-the-wall ideas to eventually find one that changes the world! We are not going to get there by contentedly accepting what we have.
This is officially now one of the best episode I have seen on this channel 👍🏾👍🏾
Interesting video but your explanation of Aurora Borealis is in part wrong. The magnetosphere captures *charged particules*, not gamma or other kind of electromagnetic radiation, those are blocked by the atmosphere. Cheers!
Charged particles ARE radiation.
@@terrafirma9328 You can call it radiation indeed. But my point is that the magnetosphere does not catch or redirect electromagnetic radiation, only charged particles, and the video specifically mentions gamma and x-ray which are electromagnetic radiation not charged particles. Cheers!
Was there a white paper written about this project? I’d love to read more.
Of course not. People don't think that engineers found that out already. But it's this student that revolutionized the solar power industry lol.
These might be great for farms growing crops that need shade like coffee, etc
This is precisely the application I was considering. To use it as a shade cover for my partial shade vegetables. We already have to screen them by not use a produce that generates energy?
Cool to see students opening up interesting new concepts. Refined down to a material, perhaps the hat I wear could charge my mobile phone wirelessly
Awesome!! Would the panels glow a little like northern lights with some of the light leakage? Id take the hit on efficiency if I can have a Northern light geodesic dome
Love your content, keep it up
I don't really like the idea of covering skyscrapers in "transparent" solar pannels, especially if they are colored like that. I think this is some niche application that has almost no usage, high cost and low efficiency.
It is because the amount of energy sent by the sun is constant regarding the ground area. If you put solar on walls, this harvest lest energy by square metter on ground. Depending on the sun inclination it can achieve more efficiency than flat ground pannels, but the shadow casted by this will be far greater. Thus honnestly, for the area covered by skyscraper walls, you could cover lots of rooftops with it and probably be more efficient especially in densely packed areas where buildings cast shadows on each others depending on the time of the day.
Moreover, if you look at power distribution through wavelenght, you find out that the most power is achieved at... visible wavelenght. So even with 100% efficiency pannels (traditionnal AND UV ones) you could not get the same output. And worst of all : I suppose that the energy conversion from UV to visible to harvest it is not perfect leading to lower overall efficiencies.
As much as I'd like to see this working to solve energy crisis problems, I think there is some physic impossibilities here. I wonder if that is possible to cumulate BOTH of this : traditionnal solar with UV conversion films. Thus it could harvest both UV and visible light, improving the solar pannel efficicency. And if that is exactly the point (this is not clear from vid, does Aureus pannels alos gather visible light ?) then it might be really good.
But what we saw is a semi-transparent solar pannel that let the visible light through...
Now this video made me click watch! More power!! Great video
Good on Carvey! Thanks, Ricky.
Definitely one of the next great innovations in creating a viable urban solar energy technology.
Also, a possible boon in upcoming urban indoor farming situations, where city buildings help grow some of the necessary food crops.
Also, in automotive applications, having the auto glass trickle charge the batteries, whether the vehicle is in use or not, is a major improvement.
Thanks for introducing this to the world. These panels may pay for themselves in places where cloudy or dark for long periods of time.
I love the positivity of this channel :) It is exactly the attitude that we need to instil into our youngster to inspire them to seek solutions rather than constantly bombarding them with negativity. Keep up the good work guys :)
Love that thanks for taking the time to write us. we really appreciate you ;)
So brilliant. I'll find out more. :)
As a native of San Diego, you can still get a sunburn on a cloudy day. :)
I wonder what is the efficiency these panel can achieve? Amorphous silicon panels also work well in cloudy weather but are way less efficient than wafer type cells.
this guy should work with one of the groups doing perovskite panels to see what they can do together. see if this would be beneficial to work together.
I've been experimenting with a 1.0m x 0.5m 100 watt 12v PV panel, and this produces 40mA on a wet cloudy day in December at about 53 deg North. It's set flat against a vertical wall.
I can't give a meaningful mA-h figure for the day because most of the time the panel is in the shadow of a building at this time of year. In summer this location is a sun trap so it will be interesting to compare the figures.
Hello from 52.4° north!
Thanks for sharing this revolutionary solar technology!
Its a good stab, but quantum dots turning UV into blue light will probably be more effective.
Samsung is already using quantum dots to turn blue light into red.
This was an amazing idea
Okay I think I get it now. It’s converting uv to visible light wavelengths in order to produce electricity. I assume it can always use visible light and then on the cloudy days it can still produce electricity. Hell yeah this is great steps. I’ve always said green energy is inefficient and instead of producing a bad product pump that money into more R&D. Make a product that is feasible to incorporate into our grid and stop wasting it on large production. Innovate, test, and improve. Love this stuff. Side note we should probably figure out how to produce panels without the large amount of waste.
I think Carvey ought to contact SolarWindow Technologies, Inc. (WNDW). I think they may have a synergy, if combined, to leap ahead of current solar panel technology. If it can be brought up to industrial levels, I think Aureus will be the next big step in solar technology. This technology would be extremely beneficial in the auto industry if its panels can embedded into various surfaces of the auto similar to what already exists in vehicles such as the Aptera, the Sono Group N.V.( SEV) and others.
Thanks for another great video.
I find it interesting that so many people like to talk down on new ideas. Of course if you’re a naysayer the probabilities are definitely in your favor. For every 100 to 500, really good new ideas maybe one of those become mass produced and come to market in an economically viable way. Being a naysayer means almost certainly that you’re going to be right, but that doesn’t mean you’re a genius, it simply means you’re playing a safe bet.
Another way to look at this is that we need 500 really good ideas so that one of them might actually come to market and make the world a better place. Those people who come up with those 100 to 500 great ideas are the people who are the real geniuses. They are the truly brave ones who are playing the game where the odds are stacked against them. In mass they are the ones who make the wold a better place.
Thank you for repeatedly celebrating the often unsung masses who use their own time money and genius in the hopes that the future can be better than the past.
So very well said!
Good point. 500 good ideas. Wich we see none of in here.
The idea of using uv light is patently dumb.
@@DimaZheludko yeah sure bud tell that to the solar panels 100 years ago
The issue here is that this isn't a new good idea. This is something that has been tried in labs for decades and wasn't even worth the time and effort to put a patent on. It isn't that it doesn't work or can't work, it just can't work effectively for power generation with traditional solar as advertized.
The idea is that translucent clouds block a lot of visible sunlight, making panels ineffective. So why not use a translucent material all the time to flitter the usable light down even more and make every day a cloudy day, but recover 10-16% of 5% of the spectrum for energy generation?
It isn't that the material itself is not without uses. It is that using it as a layer on top of traditional solar becomes the exact problem that it is trying to solve for. On this surface this smells more like an investment scam of the uneducated public rather than useful future tech.
And to be clear, a lot of really neat and interesting products and technologies have been accidental discoveries when trying to learn something entirely unrelated. And we should all be hesitant to go full thunderfoot and claim that some things which obviously are good and practical ideas are actually bad. But let's not set asside all skepticism either - too open a mind and your brain can fall out, and your wallet might follow.
Good job
"Natural ability to transform UV rays into electrical energy"? 1) Can fruits and vegetables actually do that? 2) Don't those panels work by turning UV rays into light that traditional solar cells harvest energy from?
I suspect that what is actually being proposed here is a panel that uses UV and transmits visible. Now this would actually work, in a ideal world you could cover windows with it and visually nothing is different but it would still generate a small amount of power. In principle this could also be done in IR where there is far more energy available but it is 'lower quality' energy which is harder to do anything with so I don't think this would ever be practical. The economic challenge is it is cheaper to have panels that use part of the visible light and generate power by slightly reducing the light transmission or panels that use the UV light and probably also reduce light as a unwanted side effect. The UV panels will need to be very good for this to work but fingers crossed that they can do it - it would be great.
And then there is the lifetime of these panels. UV is nasty stuff and tends to degrade most things especially anything organic. What are these panels made of and what is the active compound/stuff/quantum dots/etc (this question used to be much easier but the world has moved on). I am guessing that current panels include a UV absorbant to protect against it but clearly this is not a option in a UV fluorescent panel. And then there is the issue that half the fluorescent light goes the wrong way so needs a wavelength specific reflector. I am still keen on the idea but the more I think about it the more problems I find :-(
How long does a plant last? It sounds like these panels which rely on plant waste will have a short shelf life, unless I'm picking this up wrong?
What if you use the panell use a drill and drill on this plate? You don't drill through only a little bit to have a cutting edge so you can have this pattern and use the plate on a regular PV panel
Brilliant light power (BLP) has a free hydrino energy source that is all UV, and special photovoltaics are used to capture that energy. We ought to have full spectrum panels. It seems fresnel lenses could greatly help.
It occurs - that when Haviar creates a wrap that can top glass or existing solar panel arrays to then harvest a 20%+ boost without compromising a panel's 20+year life, he's got a winning product for certain. Doesn't sound easy though.
Great video. Hope this technology pans out. Is that an American Giant shirt you had on ?
Guess you're to busy to reply. Why even subscribe
Wow, so simple but genius
I installed Solar panels in 2009, maintenance and repairs far exceeded the energy costs I saved. Our current electricity from the grid is ultra cheap and will never allow solar or wind power to compete until the electric grid costs quadruple.
My solar panels on a cloudy day charges up my batteries let's see by 11:00 in the morning and sunny day 9:00 in the morning wow and I've been doing this now for how long 25 years I don't make solar panels I just buy them and use them and my batteries are good of course they're not the very expensive battery that give you very little amperage I like the thousand oaks well actually I like the 1250 amps but they don't sell those no more
So you cut the panel it in 5mm strip's an turn them 45° would this work like that on the edges?
If you have seen the NOVA video “Saved by the sun” the renewable energy labs, show that exact approach of layered solar panels,that absorb and collect light in the different frequencies and are able to generate power even on cloudy or overcast days. I foresee the day, when even the reflection on the sun on the moon can generate power (. 24 hour solar production) with the right combination of panels .
SO I FOUND THIS ON JULY 24, 2024 & my inquiry to the Solar panel I saw on You Tube that could still produce energy in SEMI SHADE FLASHED THIS THE AUREUS NAME OUT DATED DEC 13, 2020. /I was trying to see if the semi shade panel & Aureus were different or was my QUERRY moot because Of UV technology.
ITS NOW FOUR YEARS LATER -HAS THE CREATOR MADE MORE INPROVEMENTS TO HIS INNOVATIVE IDEA!
Is His idea Separate from the WINDOW SOLAR PANELS I SAW ON LINE OR WAS IT HIS INVENTION WE WERE REALLY WATCHING!?!
I've recently designed a system that would be complimented by this technology. I have yet to release my IP, and don't plan to do so in the immediate future. A flexible panel with a higher efficiency rate would be a major plus.
could those rain harvesting strips be added?
So are these limited to UV through visible light wavelengths ? (Limited is the wrong choice of wording but I can’t think of a better way to put it right now)
I jumped to the middle of the video and this may show my ignorance but doesn’t intensity ( maybe density?) of the UZ rays increase the output of watts? Or can you bombard these panels with photons and produce energy? Is this considered energy transfer or am I just confusing myself with my limited understanding?
Does anyone know the specific type pf crops used for this?
Fantastic and Genius Idea!
Imo'_ 'Gmo' a Crop of 'Whatever' to produce the Most 'Beneficial' active compound for the highest yield of Organic mass needed for mass production⛅🌎🌍🌏👍
What is the efficiency of this solar panel
Neat idea but it'll never pan out financially. Not for the little bit of energy it harvests.
You can drown in a hugh pool of water or even from millions of little drops under certain conditions, I wouldn't dismiss at first thought an idea like this until all the angles are explored. The turtle beat the hare over the long haul after all.
Would be great to turn Infrared to electricity?
we need a link to buy
Have you done a video on algae solar panels? 🤔
Funny that now that I watched this video, it seems like this should have been obvious since we have so many telescopes that collect all kinds of different light why not let solar panels do it also... Good thinking
Lovely.
Very interesting. One issue is that of the total spectrum reaching the earth's surface only 3% is in the UV range. If it were higher, solar panels would be "tuned" to process it. 44% of the spectrum is in the visible range-as such solar panels are "tuned" to that frequency range. But of course you knew that already, dincha?
could you also do a video on 'Perovskite Solar Panels'.
I believe there are tests going on right now to adjust Perovskite crystals to harvest different spectrums of light including ultraviolet and infrared.
Already have! ruclips.net/video/vnSNS2zF1Tk/видео.html
@@TwoBitDaVinci thank you.
Congratulations
tq.
Did the light bulb “go off” or on in his head:
Wait, nobody's ever thought of this before? That seems wild.
It's got the same feel as those "water from air in the desert" scams.
Of course people have considered it before, but the added cost analysis for the 3-5% of total solar energy that is in the UV spectrum is... dim.
One thing is for sure, the cost of manufacture is going to be a lot less, sustainability is effectively endless, questions over effectivness and longevity are the only ones that need answers
Great Job, Two Bit. This is how information finds its way to the people. However not all the people, I just saw some statistics that show we still have some flat Earth believers. Do they believe the Sun rotates around the Earth?
I am making a project for my graduation in physics on this topic can anyone help with more details on it
I wish you have a knowledge about solar constant
Energy per square meters
On cloudy days energy per square meters are reduced since sufficient energy is not reaching the the earth
Forget the bandwidth of ultraviolet or magnetism
Simply how much energy you receive and how much you can convert it efficiently
All very nice, but he announced the technology two years ago. Where's a product I can buy?
efficiency, cost effectiveness.... I hope it can be made but ultra violet is not the best choice...
8:41 PLEASE tell me that is not a real-life car dependent CITY
I don't think we have to worry about discarding perfectly good crops. Supermarkets waste enough fresh fruit and veg all over the world, crops are affected by pests and get thrown out (eg, bean seed fly or carrot fly).
A farmer with a ruined crop should be able to contact someone and have the entire crop sold off for processing into solar panels instead.
It's linking the customers to the processors which is the hard part in any industry. All too often that's the failing point.
Like the way farm animals have entire fields dedicated to feeding them, when next door may be acres of allotments or arable fields some distance off growing fields of vegetables, the edible green stuff we waste but animals could eat discarded and left to rot.
So this solar company needs to set up a unit dedicated solely to the collection of this waste matter, ensuring their contact details are freely and easily available for local growers, supermarkets and other relevant industries.
There is a school in Portland Oregon that is called da Vinci middle school. Maybe think about doing a special with the school or offer a seminar on future tech to them. The school will love it and very much appreciate it.
I love that idea! If you could help me get in touch I’ll 100% do it! Email me ricky@twobit.media
@@TwoBitDaVinci I have a contact there. I was a student the very first year the school opened, a long time ago. The school has blossomed into a creative art school for all walks of life. From Tech to dance and everything in between.
This seems cheaper option than red quantum dots.
So if that can charge 2 mobile phones a day which costs virtually nothing, how is it going to pay itself off and even offset its own carbon footprint?
Each panel would have to be less than £100 otherwise it just would not be worth it.
It's a proof of concept, it's not a production ready product yet.
Do you think early prototype solar panels produced much energy?
@@pdxmarine1430 put your handbag away you fool
Random comment for channel interaction.
Doesn't this color filter decrease solar energy, on sunny days? 2 phone charges is almost meaningless
WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT..A FILIPINO!!?WOW
"hot spots" the sun gives of energy in 2 dimensions Hydrogen @ 13.6 Ev & Helium @ 25 Ev, my solar panels tell me so! most of the time they are read Hydrogen & act normally but when it reaches these "hot spots " the same panels are recording Helium @ 25 Ev & the beginning of a wide drought occurs!
I bet most people don't get solar for environment ,they get it to save money
When solar pv like this is proven, people who rent will have the option of going green
Atm its a middle n upperclass thing
For me its a dream
The building will have to be built
Or retro fitted with the systems..
I know of student halls of residence and Nursing accomodation blocks that have solar water heating built in and PV panels..
All new buildings need to be built as close to Passive house standards and incorporate renewable energy harvesting .
As always that 2 bit da vinci energy is awesome!
... but lets not get taken for a ride on something either. There just isn't much UV light to work with, and it is far simpler to do a direct capture of UV light which can get similar efficiency to normal PV solar than making a film which re-emits in a different wave length. The issue there however is that the harsh nature of UV breaks down the material and panels need to be replaced more often. That is why most companies will use a UV film to prevent UV from ever reaching the panel in the first place. The energy created does not justify the cost of replacement, and a re-emission film like this would only hurt the normal solar efficiency.
That being said - there are no bad products, only bad costs. So if you had a high UV environment and needed something that isn't as likely to break down, then this may be a good solution. So maybe something in space? Or some industrial process that uses UV? Or more as a sensor rather than power production? Or some future concentrated solar plant that sorts the warelengths first to more effeciently use UV, visible, and IR energy?
There may be a good use for this, but right now it looks like a solution trying to find a problem still. Its like a 90s kid who had UV color changing shirts or cups and was like... I wonder if this could be used for something other than color changing pigments and UV resin?
What I am really struggling with is how many large items are going to be socially acceptble in lime-green. I mean solar panels and windmills are beautiful and the nimby crowd is already dead-set against them. They would think the world was ending if a skyscrapter was covered in sheets of this lol.
Look for MoonStudio's answer if you like numbers.
Come with me if you prefer using just common sense alone.
So, we have solar panels that work on visible light. And these panels need a lot of that light to give usable power. So, in cloudy days there's also lots of light, but it's so much darker, that these panels produce barely any power.
What does our invention do? It converts UV into visible light. So much of it, that it makes panels much more powerful in cloudy days.
Let me spell it once more. Thin glass produces more visible light than there comes from cloudy sky by itself. It must look much, much brighter than the cloudy sky by itself. So, do we see that in reality? Do we see that in pictures at least? Nope. Look at this glass and at white building and tell me which one is brighter. 4:56
Ok, visible or not. What about the power? Everyone knows that on cloudy days it's now so warm outside, right? No need any sophisticated equipment. Just fill some black bucket of cold water and compare how fast it gets hot in sunny and cloudy weather. Do we have the same power or at least camparable? No. If UV delivered any power, we would still see somewhat fast heating through clouds. But we don't and the reason is amount of that power.
Looks like AuREUS is another "design" project from someone who doesn't care about physics.
So florencet green stained glass on the solar panel. Okay I see no data sheet and also see no future. The effect is negligible.
I’m two bits disappointed that you don’t do a basic check of how much energy could be harvested from UV light. The fact that life on earth is not radiated away is because we have an (ozone) atmosphere that is extremely efficient at blocking the dangerous UV light. This idea is just silly for that reason.
Until they can produce at night, it doesn’t really matter.
Sounds like the guy has got a good product. That will cause a problems with the big guy's. Say goodbye to that idea.
You know it's total BS when Two Bit da Vinci spends literally 1 minute of the 9.45 minutes of the video explaining where the name for the product comes from. This idea has been worked on for years. The main problem is that the power loss from the coating on a solar cell more than offsets the power gain from UV. Anyway, who would work/live in a room with these on the windows, creating a yellow room? PS Aurora does not specifically come from aurora borealis (northern lights) - there's also aurora australis (southern lights) as well.
What about exposure to humans? Could it lead to cancer?
I have a question: could it be that most of the earth’s heat escapes into outer space via the poles? Could that the the main reason that the poles are so cold?? I know that the poles are located where sunlight is weakest, but air and water current flow patterns ought to distribute heat to the poles----unless heat were escaping from the poles at an exaggerated rate due to the absence of the “magnetic bottle” effect that prevents heat loss where the bottle is intact.
NO! So many wanna downplay the Influence of the sun. Dont worry there will come a time you shall understand!
They all work but all are totally inefficient and the part time power is useless as the output is so low and in the the uk a waste of time and money
1.75x
All solar panel works on cloudy days just not a much
Bullshit meter is going off.
Next video panels that produce power while in your basement.... Click click
balloon up above clouds, but dont bloat down by weight
bah, carbon black all wavelength heat collectors, or just copper with concentrators/reflectors
lightning wire down for above the clouds, so where did you get your stuff, if not from above, thanks for all those, I'll keep them, when you dont, "I keep them for you", "instead of"
yet another patent, how boring
oh they can, what are you talking about
oh you believe a lie, again
It's cool, but we have to know the numbers. EXAMPLE :
in 1 day, there is 50% sun time and 50% cloud time (Fake numbers)
1) Normal solar --> Does 200 energy points in SUN time and 0 points in CLOUD time ---> 200 points per day
2) AuREUS soalr --> Does 80 energy points in SUN time and 50 points in CLOUD time --> 130 points per day
BUT maybe AuREUS is cheaper ? so 130 is good for it's price... and the numbers are fake. So maybe it's more or less than 130 points.
I like this approach and how you think! Definitely agrrr
2:40 - Yes, there is also _aurora australis_ - southern light, of course. You know, Earth has _two_ magnetic poles.
3:00 - NO, not "usually gamma or UV radiation" - _charged_ particles (electrons, protons, perhaps some helium ions...) are "bashing" into air molecules. You mention correctly, just few seconds before, that solar wind consists of charged particles, and that some of those get trapped in Earth's magnetic field.
So, this invention consists of conventional solar panel with a layer of organic fluorescent die. Clever. but you explained the whole concept pretty terribly.
i was enjoying the video until that sponsor came up. you'd really accept a NFT sponsorship on a video about solar panels? have you no thought about the energy consumption of their blockchains?
Interesting idea. However, I’m gonna be a little annoying here and encourage you here to be more careful about your choice of words. Please take it with a smile, it’s no big deal, just a couple things I noticed. You said earth is nothing but a giant magnet. Well, it is a giant magnet, but it is much more than that. And you said that this new technology could increase our use of solar exponentially. It looks to me like that would be linear, not exponential. To be exponential there has to be some element to it that increases by the more that you already have of them. Solar panel sales are growing exponentially, but in order to claim that this technology would be exponential you would have to show some kind of exponential increase beyond that and I don’t think that’s there.