Coriolis Effect Debunks Flat Earth?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 янв 2025

Комментарии • 703

  • @FlatEarthEric
    @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +79

    In the mid-19th century, a Frenchman named Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis performed several experiments showing the effect of kinetic energy on rotating systems, which have ever since become mythologized as proof of the heliocentric theory of the cosmos. The “Coriolis Effect” is often said to cause sinks and toilet bowls in the Northern Hemisphere to drain spinning in one direction while in the Southern Hemisphere causing them to spin the opposite way, thus providing proof of the spinning ball-Earth. Once again, however, just like Foucault’s Pendulums spinning either which way, sinks and toilets in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres do not consistently spin in any one direction! Sinks and toilets in the very same household are often found to spin opposite directions, depending entirely upon the shape of the basin and the angle of the water’s entry, not the supposed rotation of the Earth.
    NOTE: For people who have seen my other similar videos on these subjects, I am updating them with new information, new visuals, and higher quality audio/video, also giving them different titles to to work around the algorithm. You can help by liking, commenting, sharing, and subscribing, thanks!
    Get Connected With Me:
    Website: www.EricDubay.com
    Blog: www.AtlanteanConspiracy.com
    Forum: www.IFERS.123.st
    Books: www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay
    Facebook: web.facebook.com/groups/edfes/
    Instagram: instagram.com/ericdubaz/
    Twitter: twitter.com/ericdubay
    SoundCloud: soundcloud.com/eric-dubay/
    Mewe: mewe.com/i/ericdubay
    Minds: www.minds.com/EricDubay
    Gab: gab.ai/Eric-Dubay
    Goodreads: www.goodreads.com/ericdubay
    RUclips: ruclips.net/user/flateartheric
    Odysee: odysee.com/@EricDubay:c
    BitChute: www.bitchute.com/channel/TCgwKoAf3Y9z/
    BrandNewTube: brandnewtube.com/@EricDubay
    Real Truthseekers: real-truth-seekers.com/truthseeker/ericdubay/
    Rokfin: rokfin.com/EricDubay
    Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-1286253
    Telegram: t.me/flatearthericdubay
    Email: ericdubaynewsletter@protonmail.com

    • @P777M33G
      @P777M33G 2 года назад +2

      Sup bro ✋🏻

    • @truthfulfreedomfighter9123
      @truthfulfreedomfighter9123 2 года назад +4

      Thank you Eric 💕👍

    • @benvinar2876
      @benvinar2876 2 года назад +8

      U should title all your videos , debunking flat earth. Just to fuck with them

    • @vickymarinou6271
      @vickymarinou6271 2 года назад +1

      Please pin this comment to the top so that it doesn't get lost in the sea of comments

    • @GMG0894
      @GMG0894 2 года назад +1

      Great simple demonstration, in which we needed you to point out the obvious. Fkn people are more manipulative than the way they manipulate the water in their "science" sinks.

  • @fishersteven8900
    @fishersteven8900 2 года назад +19

    Be realistic I don't understand how you can think the earth is not flat. It's in your face everywhere. Just open your eyes it's right in front of you. Sheeple 💯 FLAT

  • @phantom2k10
    @phantom2k10 2 года назад +161

    What fascinates me so much about this flat earth truth,is the efforts made by all these big social networking platforms to censor the information.I understand and appreciate the fact that you dictate how things are done on your platform,but why not let people come to their own conclusions before completely writing off ideas,theories and information? there shouldn't be a bias when it comes to censoring content.Anyway,great vid as always eric

    • @saltysergeant4284
      @saltysergeant4284 2 года назад +27

      Yessir. Anything that is censored is more truth than the propaganda we see on tv. The lady doth protest TOO much. It's a dead giveaway.

    • @maryflower3479
      @maryflower3479 2 года назад +3

      Big social networking platforms don't want the uneducated to fall off of
      the edge of the earth.

    • @raymondvaughn9723
      @raymondvaughn9723 2 года назад +1

      Your not serious with that approach are you? Come on. Don't dumb it down to open mindedness. There is none in the ruling elite of this world.

    • @bluepenguin3686
      @bluepenguin3686 2 года назад +3

      I do not condone those who question everything, only those who do not allow questions.
      I 4get the actual quote but you get the idea

    • @michaelglendinning1738
      @michaelglendinning1738 2 года назад +4

      Media is used only to conquer. We are the enemy. They don't like the enemy giving their views, especially if it makes the whole house of cards fall.

  • @sheilaloya8900
    @sheilaloya8900 2 года назад +35

    Thank you! My boyfriend is almost there... He just couldn't get over how snipers have to "account for the Coriolis effect". This is just what I needed!

    • @nicholasbrown2707
      @nicholasbrown2707 2 года назад +12

      Snipers do not account for any coriolis. They use a spotter and DOPE. Data On Personal Equipment. Doesn't matter what direction they aim, as it should on globe earth. All that matters is the wind direction, the height and distance of the target and the spotters triangulation. When a target is too far a bullet will tumble after falling back through the sound barrier. The bullet tumbles randomly regardless of the direction fired. There is no way anyone could account for coriolis, as not only does it not exist (it's own definition is an illusion) but also there is no 'coriolis database' or anyway to check how a bullet fired in any direction would be effected by anything except wind.

    • @sheilaloya8900
      @sheilaloya8900 2 года назад +3

      @@nicholasbrown2707 thank you! I'm gonna screenshot this response and show it to him. 🙏🙏🙏😁

    • @sameenergy9414
      @sameenergy9414 2 года назад +6

      If snipers have to supposedly account for the Coriolis effect, shouldn't NFL quarterbacks have to also? Ask your boyfriend has he ever taken the Coriolis effect into account whenever he's thrown a baseball or football.

    • @sheilaloya8900
      @sheilaloya8900 2 года назад

      @@sameenergy9414 lol... Right?

    • @paulturek9620
      @paulturek9620 2 года назад

      @@nicholasbrown2707 data on previous engagements*

  • @davechristensen2482
    @davechristensen2482 2 года назад +72

    I have a friend that shoots guns alot.
    He will defend the coriolus effect religiously regarding a bullet........
    but when I switch the question about planes coming into land on a moving runway....
    He claims that everything is relative to the moving earth (like in a moving car).
    Can't have it both ways!!!
    Excellent video, Eric.
    I love the short videos.
    And the 2 hour ones:)

    • @S-Theo
      @S-Theo 2 года назад +18

      i saw sniper handbook from 80's no coriolis effect mentioned once !

    • @scottmerrow1488
      @scottmerrow1488 2 года назад +5

      @@S-Theo Exactly

    • @rayb1966
      @rayb1966 2 года назад +1

      Brainwashing is strong in many, but that’s all it is brainwashing. Sad really. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @picolascage8123
      @picolascage8123 2 года назад +17

      I personally have shot out to 3/4 of a mile (1300) ish yards and have never correct my firing solution for anything other than bullet drop,bullet spin drift,wind,temperature and elevation.

    • @meutubedou
      @meutubedou 2 года назад +4

      A friend? Why haven’t you called him a LIAR? That’s the best thing to do when a LIAR is a Known Liar.. If I was you I’d get a smarter class of friends. Why hang around Satanic Cretins who knowingly LIE? Tell the LIAR to Ask any Captain of any Ship, Any Pilot, Any Railroad Engineer, Any Bridge Builder, Any Contractor, Any Engineer, Any Surveyor, etc. etc. NOT one will say they ever saw curvature or figured curvature into their projects or LIVES or Jobs! And not one will say the earth moves under them or has the Coriolis Effect aka magic spin 🤣👍If they do they are a LIAR! And if you don’t have the courage to call them a LIAR, have them contact me and I’ll do it for you! Be proud to speak truth! Call out these LIARS every opportunity given👍 Truth is not to be suppressed by LIARS..

  • @diecastmodelsnbeyond6354
    @diecastmodelsnbeyond6354 2 года назад +54

    People: Do you believe the earth is flat?
    Me: I don't believe, I know is flat.
    Thank you Eric for your work and God Bless you and all you wonderful people. ♥️🙏

    • @b44rt
      @b44rt 2 года назад +7

      Most people fear the ridicule more than anyting. I consider myself very openen minded and was always into conspiracy theories, however when hearing about flat earth for the first times (years and years ago) I would cringe, did not want to know about it. I learned about Eric from a Anarchast interview (Jeff Berwick Dollar Vigilante) I was like ok ok i will give this a chance.
      Well many years later and I too KNOW the earth is flat.

    • @doofstar57
      @doofstar57 2 года назад +2

      @@b44rt Me too.

    • @quantum4089
      @quantum4089 2 года назад

      SAME THING WITH GOD

    • @joedoe2407
      @joedoe2407 2 года назад +2

      ​@@b44rt And people have been deceived like sheep for the bigger part of recorded history. Given that the winners write and maintain history, it makes perfect sense for deception to be the norm. However, we all conveniently ignore that part and trust it blindly anyway.

    • @Reticulated_Spline
      @Reticulated_Spline 2 года назад

      People: Do you believe the earth is a pizza?
      Me: I don't believe, I know it is a pizza.

  • @mexicounexplained
    @mexicounexplained 2 года назад +45

    When I was posted to Sao Paulo, Brazil for work (way back when I actually worked for others) one of the first things I did when I settled into my new apartment was to go to the toilet and see if the water went down the drain counter-clockwise as I had been told it would. To my surprise, it didn't. I shrugged it off like a "normie" and went on with things, but that Coriolis lie had always been in the back of my mind. Thanks Eric. Another solid video.

    • @vitocoriolis4198
      @vitocoriolis4198 2 года назад +1

      Yes

    • @mexicounexplained
      @mexicounexplained 2 года назад

      @@karenbsunkemptbush5819 lol

    • @mexicounexplained
      @mexicounexplained 2 года назад

      @@karenbsunkemptbush5819 LOL Why are you even commenting?

    • @darrenenright1728
      @darrenenright1728 2 года назад

      @@karenbsunkemptbush5819 does the Coriolis theory affect a Nikon P900 camera?😉🤣🤣 Coriolis another clown like Einstein! Stop defieing your senses that the creator has given you & best decalcify that penael gland 😉

  • @MeekElect
    @MeekElect 2 года назад +37

    I had a good couple of hours debate on the flat earth with a very experienced retired military pilot who said that the reason why they're are no long distance direct flights in the southern hemisphere is because they are told to hug the coast line of continents so an effective rescue attempt was more feasible than one that was days travel away. which sounds good until you realise that not a single big business industry would concern themselves with human life over profits and fuel costs for a single flight across the southern hemisphere would increase profits massively and the only reason they don't do it is because it's not possible

    • @Venom96930
      @Venom96930 2 года назад +3

      I think you don't understand. Flying safety is much more profitable, if people would die on the Plane and the personel would to nothing then the people would stop flying in a Airlines where they don't feel safe, what you don't get about it. It's like claiming that Pizza delivers should run over people crossing the road because "The big Corporation like Pizza Hut doesn't care about people, they only care about Profits".

    • @NostyFripples
      @NostyFripples 2 года назад +9

      @@Venom96930 The internet…where people will say damn near anything just to disagree with you lmfao cool story bro 🤣

    • @Venom96930
      @Venom96930 2 года назад +1

      @@NostyFripples I'm not telling any story, i'm just trying to explain to this idiot how profiting Works. As i stated Corporations do care about it's consumers if it gives them money. Explain how does letting people die on the plane increases profit because i'm apparently too stupid to Understand it.

    • @josephsalmonte4995
      @josephsalmonte4995 2 года назад +13

      @@Venom96930 planes don't go down anywhere near enough to make that a viable business strategy. The "rescue" reason is clearly false.

    • @Venom96930
      @Venom96930 2 года назад +2

      @@josephsalmonte4995 Why?

  • @blairwischnowsky5355
    @blairwischnowsky5355 2 года назад +16

    Thank you. From n.z i share your videos all the time trying to break the programming of my friends and family. You are a dedicated, selfless beacon of light. Wishing peace, nugs, and good health to everyone reading this.

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +6

      Much appreciated, thanks Blair

    • @knivesron
      @knivesron 2 года назад

      your friends and famliy must think your really stupid. you should learn the globe earth lie in more detail, like really come to a full understanding of the lie.

  • @mikeg1032
    @mikeg1032 2 года назад +104

    Wait wait wait. So the colioris effect supposedly effects bullets but doesn't affect a hot air balloon? I thought everything within the atmosphere is spinning together at the same time???? They literally just debunked themselves.

    • @DTG_LOCKETT
      @DTG_LOCKETT 2 года назад +14

      A balloon is floating and a bullet is moving forward at a high velocity. Comparing the two would be like thinking if you threw a rock and feather out the window of you car at someone while driving and expecting them both to hit the person

    • @jeremysimmons2005
      @jeremysimmons2005 2 года назад +12

      It's flat as pancake

    • @mikeg1032
      @mikeg1032 2 года назад +9

      @@DTG_LOCKETT no. its still an object in the air. how fast its moving is completely irrelevant

    • @DTG_LOCKETT
      @DTG_LOCKETT 2 года назад

      @@mikeg1032 it's absolutely relevant. I can't think of a way to explain this to you in a RUclips thread but I'll try. A bullet flying at approximately the speed of sound should never be compared to an object floating on wind currents. I hate to say it like this but that is just stupid. I can blow air on a balloon and change the direction it's floating in. If you were capable of blowing air on a bullet will it's direction change?
      Dubay is either a conman or he doesn't understand simple physics and he is taking advantage of your desire to be given proof your beliefs are correct when they are not.
      I believe you are being taken advantage of for profit thinking he is more knowledgeable of science then you but he's actually a conman with access to Google

    • @mikeg1032
      @mikeg1032 2 года назад +14

      @@DTG_LOCKETT cognitive dissonance is making you not see clearly. I was like you once. This conversation is only going to get negative so I'm gana withdraw

  • @michaelglendinning1738
    @michaelglendinning1738 2 года назад +40

    The part where you mention the sniper myth followed by hot air balloons and helicopters not having that myth attributed to it is brilliant. That point is a huge nail in the coffin. INCREDIBLE POINT!!!

    • @Scribe3168
      @Scribe3168 2 года назад +1

      It’s due to the spinning of the bullet due to the rifling of the barrel

    • @JS-fn8kg
      @JS-fn8kg 2 года назад +1

      You need to understand that gravity is very selective. It doesn't really care much for balloons and helicopters like it does bullets. Do you even science?

    • @michaelglendinning1738
      @michaelglendinning1738 2 года назад +1

      @@JS-fn8kg you said it yourself. Your theory of gravity is selective. I rest my case

    • @JS-fn8kg
      @JS-fn8kg 2 года назад +1

      @@michaelglendinning1738 correction. I rest your case. It's science bro.

    • @michaelglendinning1738
      @michaelglendinning1738 2 года назад +1

      @@JS-fn8kg your's is actually a spell. Science is testing with your own observations. You are taking their word for it. You have to take NASA's word for it.......and you call that science?

  • @truthseeker9561
    @truthseeker9561 2 года назад +18

    the entry vents on a toilet are angled for the swirling effect. next time you change one, bust the old one and see. some can actually be seen simply by using a small mirror

    • @DTG_LOCKETT
      @DTG_LOCKETT 2 года назад +1

      There's a video on RUclips of the guy placing a single flower in in basins of water and waiting for the water to stop moving before they open the drain

    • @toberrdrawforc
      @toberrdrawforc 2 года назад

      🙄 LOL 😜

    • @himawari8337
      @himawari8337 2 года назад

      I’m gonna smash my shitter up and take a look

    • @NostyFripples
      @NostyFripples 2 года назад

      Log flume 101

    • @Mor2gain_760
      @Mor2gain_760 2 года назад

      @@DTG_LOCKETT
      And then what happened ???

  • @HalfWarrior
    @HalfWarrior 2 года назад +5

    I fired different rifles at a target that was 1000 yards away; the type of gun and the mass and density of the bullets fired at the target was what determined the correct aim for each. One was a .223 caliber AR15; smaller and faster bullet; the other was a Sharps rifle(52 caliber bullet); much bigger and slower in feet per second than the AR. I had to aim higher with the sharps to hit the target. I could count 3 seconds from firing the Sharps to time of impact; could barely perceive the time with the .223; only density; size and speed of the bullets could be the difference in time to hit the target. No corialis shit whatsoever.

  • @GMG0894
    @GMG0894 2 года назад +15

    We don't live on a space testicle. Keep up the good work G..

  • @NorthernGate777
    @NorthernGate777 2 года назад +7

    Engineers are also taught to name a particular flow meter called the “coriolis meter” after Gustav but if you dig deeper you will see this meter works on the inertia principle and pendulum swing .

  • @jimmeyer7632
    @jimmeyer7632 2 года назад +20

    DOESN'T CHANGE A THING !!!!!!!!! 10'S OF THOUSANDS OF SQUARE MILES OF OCEAN PROVE ABSOLUTELY THAT ALL THAT WATER THAT LAYS FLAT AND LEVEL SAYS THE EARTH IS FLAT !!!!!!!!

    • @justinfreesoul6366
      @justinfreesoul6366 2 года назад +4

      Water is the easiest proof of all. Masses of still water surfaces never curve. An easily provable, observable FACT for everyone!

    • @jimmeyer7632
      @jimmeyer7632 2 года назад +5

      MY NEXT FAVORITE IS
      THE EARTH DOING 10'S
      OF MILLIONS OF MILES OF ORBITING THE SUN AND THEN THE ENTIRE SOLAR SYSTEM BLASTING THROUGH THE GALAXIES GOING BILLIONS OF. MILES EVERY YEAR AND YET THE NIGHT'S SKY NEVER CHANGES !!!!!!!! THE NORTH STAR IS ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS .... IN THE SAME PLACE IT HAS BEEN SINCE RECORDED HISTORY .... I TRUST MY EYES AND NOT THE LIES

    • @joedoe2407
      @joedoe2407 2 года назад

      @@jimmeyer7632 True. And in that chaotic trajectory through space we feel entirely stationary by some kind of "scientific" magic.

    • @jimmeyer7632
      @jimmeyer7632 2 года назад

      @@joedoe2407 THEY CALL IT MAGIC. ....... I CALL IT LIES ..... IN FACT I CALLIT
      RULE NUMBER ONE .....
      EVERYTHING IS A LIE EVERYTHING EVERYTHING EVERYTHING EVERYTHING EVERYTHING

    • @rogiba5115
      @rogiba5115 2 года назад +1

      @@jimmeyer7632 my favorite is the vacuum side by side with atmosphere..... try to do this in a lab..... good luck lol..... its all fake

  • @raulvrilvalenzuela924
    @raulvrilvalenzuela924 2 года назад +12

    The truth isn't for everyone especially when we get to the spiritual and afterlife explanation side of things.

  • @anarupadgett2879
    @anarupadgett2879 2 года назад +14

    I love the way you phase your titles to dodge the Algorithm, 1000iq

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +9

      Thanks Anaru, gotta play 5D chess to speak truth these days

    • @meearo
      @meearo 2 года назад +1

      @@FlatEarthEric No need for 5D chess Eric; algorithms are fast but stupid, and don't come anywhere close to a human brain. I also noticed what you were doing and have been for some while now. Keep up the good work.

  • @gmolinari2513
    @gmolinari2513 2 года назад +17

    Talk to ANY tow gunner, long-range sniper, or tank operator, and they will tell you "we never factor in any such spin." Just because they put it in movies, it has no bearing on actual trajectory. Love how Eric keeps hammering nails into the coffin. Lol

  • @alphabeta1337
    @alphabeta1337 2 года назад +24

    Outer space is water

    • @ManlyServant
      @ManlyServant 2 года назад +1

      as the bible said

    • @pola2090
      @pola2090 2 года назад +1

      Seems like it. Even the stars have that wobbly shine to them like there refracting through a dense medium not an empty vacuum of space.

  • @sharps8726
    @sharps8726 2 года назад +12

    The world is spinning so fast you can see the sun set in a few minutes.
    When you ask them why you cannot feel the spin they say the earth is rotating so slow relative to us.
    When it suits them it spins fast , when it doesnt suit them it spins slow.
    This is straight out mental magic . 🎩

    • @saltysergeant4284
      @saltysergeant4284 2 года назад +9

      Bingo. Same deal with big and small.
      "Oh, Earth is too big to measure in any way! We're so HUGE!"
      "Oh, Earth is too small to notice changes in outer space. We're so TINY!"
      Flip flop garbage excuses.

    • @Mor2gain_760
      @Mor2gain_760 2 года назад +3

      @@saltysergeant4284
      Then the use of relativity comes into play... As if it makes everything that doesn't make sense magically make sense!

    • @luis-sophus-8227
      @luis-sophus-8227 11 месяцев назад

      @@Mor2gain_760 bbbbbbutttt space time distortion 😡

  • @SmokeConsciousHipHop
    @SmokeConsciousHipHop 2 года назад +18

    Absolutely smashed it, I love when you go back and re-cover some of these topics as it's not like the 'normies' ever stop asking, "but what about the Coriolis effect!?" or "but what about gravity!?" and the hundred other knee-jerk, emotional, word-vomit reactions they have when confronted with FE truth.
    Thanks for everything you do, my friend.

  • @87mrkemo
    @87mrkemo 2 года назад +15

    Started listening to you around 2016 or 17’ and you really made me question this world we live in. I’m glad you’re still around making content like this. Much love Eric

    • @87mrkemo
      @87mrkemo 2 года назад

      @@karenbsunkemptbush5819 only thing that’s nonsense is this spinning ball of water hurtling through space. Come on bro.

    • @87mrkemo
      @87mrkemo 2 года назад

      @@karenbsunkemptbush5819 There’s quite a few. But one that really made me question this stuff is the fact that nobody has been able to measure any curvature of the earth. Or how about Neil DeGrasse Tyson always saying the earth is pear shaped, or an oblong sphere. Yet the photos we get from NASA or any other space agency are always perfectly circular? Not here to argue, you asked for my opinion so I gave it.

    • @87mrkemo
      @87mrkemo 2 года назад

      @@karenbsunkemptbush5819 I respectfully disagree. Gravity is another topic that makes no sense. Having such a strong force to keep the water intact, but small insects or birds can fly. It’s absurd. Everyone knows water stays level. It cannot curve.

    • @87mrkemo
      @87mrkemo 2 года назад

      @@karenbsunkemptbush5819 dude, we can go on and on. Clearly we both are not jumping ship from our beliefs. Let’s just agree to disagree. Thanks for having an open convo and not name calling.

    • @87mrkemo
      @87mrkemo 2 года назад

      @@karenbsunkemptbush5819 misunderstanding of what NDT said? Did he not say the earth is an oblong sphere? Or pear shaped? But NASA photos are always perfectly circular. And nobody being able to measure any kind of curvature is a huge proof bud.

  • @jesleysnipes3758
    @jesleysnipes3758 2 года назад +5

    I don't even listen to music anymore. I just listen to 6-8 hour audiobooks by Eric Dubay. I've been brainwashed all of my life. So it is refreshing to finally hear truth about our existence on Earth. I'm still astonished at what IS true and how thickly indoctrinated and brainwashed I was by modern astronomy. I bought it all for a long time. I managed to keep myself perfectly content with not truly knowing how all these supposed motions happen. Even with people I had what I thought were 'deep' conversations about the 'universe' and what our place in it means. Most of my friends were/are atheists for no other reason than they went all in on heliocentric astronomy as truth. Gravity, evolution, the Big Bang, a whirling sea-earth 'globe', bendy oceans, moon landings, space, space exploration, space aliens. Material is their God. It's absurd and sad what lies we are told. Again, thank you Eric for all your work. 🙌🏼❤️

    • @OneWingdAnge1
      @OneWingdAnge1 2 года назад +2

      Sounds like you replaced, whatever was brainwashing you. Now it's Eric's turn to brainwash you, nice! 6-8hours that crazy amount of time wasted.

    • @jesleysnipes3758
      @jesleysnipes3758 2 года назад +2

      @@OneWingdAnge1 but it's not a waste of your time to reply to my comment or carefully scanning the comments of a flat earth channel. Right? 🤔

    • @jesleysnipes3758
      @jesleysnipes3758 2 года назад +1

      @Sheltering Sky "Nad" is a perfect troll name.

    • @carolherring138
      @carolherring138 2 года назад +1

      Yep me too.. hours an hours an days of listening to him. ❤ the content

  • @rchristy4540
    @rchristy4540 2 года назад +18

    Thanks Eric. You've got a large following in Australia starting to gather.

  • @reinoplano1717
    @reinoplano1717 2 года назад +25

    Este efeito comporta- se como a gravidade fictícia ; seletiva.

  • @NostyFripples
    @NostyFripples 2 года назад +24

    You should call this shorts series *The Dubay Debunkening* 😆
    Good work as always Eric!

  • @alphabeta1337
    @alphabeta1337 2 года назад +12

    Flat earth is interesting

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +8

      And unlike the ball Earth, it exists: ericdubay.wordpress.com/2018/07/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-a-spinning-ball-english/

  • @ivanthegreat3966
    @ivanthegreat3966 2 года назад +5

    I remember in marine corps Boot Camp the rifle range instructor mentioning the spin of the earth as something you have to consider but only at great distances and since we only shot at max 500 yards we didn’t have to worry about it. Lmao.

  • @Invisible.24.7
    @Invisible.24.7 2 года назад +7

    I've tried this basic experiment and, yip you are correct again Eric, water vortexs both ways, depending on the way the water moves even when the water looks still, it's still moving, Simply stuff that anyone can prove.

  • @reginagilby1101
    @reginagilby1101 2 года назад +5

    I love seeing your name in my notifications ❤️💙🙏🏽

  • @googanslayer6675
    @googanslayer6675 2 года назад +1

    Any videos on barometric pressure?

  • @Pipemonkey
    @Pipemonkey 2 года назад +4

    In my opinion Eric, you are truth, you walk with eyes open, and you mind at peace.
    I thank you for all your hard work trying to wake us and let us see the truth.
    My eyes are now open and I see through their lies.
    God love you and keep you safe.

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +3

      Doing my best to walk that path, thanks PMG

  • @ashleytaylor994
    @ashleytaylor994 2 года назад +2

    These short style videos are great for the fluoridated short attention spans.

  • @TheLastRelevantSage2
    @TheLastRelevantSage2 2 года назад +5

    Funny how we went from "something's spinning" to "spinning something".😁

  • @jhnxavier
    @jhnxavier 2 года назад +15

    If _”Coriolis”_ can effect a football flying past a goal post _(like NDT claims),_ but doesn’t effect the rectilinear trajectory of say a blimp in the air _above_ the football game; then we have *inconsistency.*

  • @iljawildemeersch7476
    @iljawildemeersch7476 2 года назад +1

    hey eric, which is the site you use to watch all the storms on the plane?

  • @chrispower4437
    @chrispower4437 2 года назад +3

    Eric! Thank you for work. May I ask for a reboot of one of your long lost videos debunking nuclear weapons? I watched it years ago

  • @allenbency6603
    @allenbency6603 2 года назад +3

    Hai some one help me please ,.Distance of moon from earth is calculated around 288k-320k kilometers with laser ranging method ...But home can the moon be this much distant in a flat eath model

    • @joedoe2407
      @joedoe2407 2 года назад +2

      Maybe dig into it and find out for yourself?

    • @allenbency6603
      @allenbency6603 2 года назад +3

      @@joedoe2407 asking others is also a method to gather knowledge ..As far my understanding 300000 KM it's not possible in flat earth

    • @allenbency6603
      @allenbency6603 2 года назад

      @Sheltering Sky on flat earth model the Diameter of earth is about 20,000 km ...How can moon be 3,00,000 km distant in the flat earth model . I have seem many flat earth videos in which all claims to be a local moon of about 3000 km distant

    • @allenbency6603
      @allenbency6603 2 года назад

      @Sheltering Sky bro there is issue if the earth is 20,000km in diameter nd the moon is 3,00,000 km away ..The current flatearth model fails ...Just imagine bro if the sun and moon is 3,00,000 km away in flat earth then it will be visible always ...
      2)one more issue I find with flat earth is that when we go up the air pressure decreases ..If it's just buoyancy the pressure should remain same inside a closed container (firmament )

  • @gencis44
    @gencis44 2 года назад +3

    Hey Eric , these short video's are really powerful ... i can give a link now to my friends when they ask me about something FE ..
    Bravo , keep up the good work

  • @dessy0523
    @dessy0523 2 года назад +6

    A few years back I had a flat earth discussion with some friends. I mentioned that a helicopter should be able to hover in one spot and after 12 hours half the world should have passed by. They told me that Logic didn’t make sense lol, brought a smile to my face hearing you mention that exact example.

  • @steffendammann2984
    @steffendammann2984 2 года назад +3

    What about the trade winds, have you mentioned them in another video yet?

  • @inhonorofthetruth
    @inhonorofthetruth 2 года назад +4

    Your videos are very educational, they will be gold for the time to teach our children. unlike the others who use this truth for fame and podcasts.

  • @suejohnson9645
    @suejohnson9645 2 года назад +1

    if coriolis effect means water spins opposite directions from opposite poles, then which way does it spin at the equator?.. and does this idea mean that huricanes that begin in the south, will unwind n spin the other direction in the north?

  • @DrJones-nh4my
    @DrJones-nh4my 2 года назад +4

    If the water is effected, then people, animals and plants/trees should also be effected by the carioles effect.

    • @bluepenguin3686
      @bluepenguin3686 2 года назад +1

      This is what ive always thought about the tides... If the oceans move because of the moon, why arent ALL lakes and bodies of water moving like the tides?

    • @DrJones-nh4my
      @DrJones-nh4my 2 года назад

      @@bluepenguin3686 Exactly. It doesn’t make sense. It’s all a lie.

  • @valherustinger7848
    @valherustinger7848 2 года назад +1

    Hi Eric, So I was watching the pod cast on Joe Rogans website with Neil and Joe, mentioned how you delete comments. My last comment was a test and you passed with flying colours. Well done mate. Keep it real. Pew pew.

  • @farkasbelabill5969
    @farkasbelabill5969 2 года назад +7

    Great Job 💡 God Bless All Of You 🔥

  • @nicholasbrown2707
    @nicholasbrown2707 2 года назад +11

    Snipers do not account for any coriolis. They use a spotter and DOPE. Data On Personal Equipment. Doesn't matter what direction they aim, as it should on globe earth. All that matters is the wind direction, the height and distance of the target and the spotters triangulation. dew-point and elevation for barometric pressure. When a target is too far a bullet will tumble after falling back through the sound barrier. The bullet tumbles randomly regardless of the direction fired. There is no way anyone could account for coriolis, as not only does it not exist (it's own definition is an illusion) but also there is no 'coriolis database' or anyway to check how a bullet fired in any direction would be effected by anything except wind elevation, and humidity for drag.

    • @justinfreesoul6366
      @justinfreesoul6366 2 года назад +5

      Excellent explanation! That's what flat earthers are : The smartest people with critical thinking skills

    • @toberrdrawforc
      @toberrdrawforc 2 года назад +2

      @Sheltering Sky
      😆👊🏻👍🏻

    • @spacemonkey1776
      @spacemonkey1776 2 года назад +1

      @@maximustrolleus9860 maximus, maximus, maximus. Oh where art thou words of enlightenment? Why does your reply comment of regurgitated knowledge fleet from mine eyes?

  • @robertsayegh7944
    @robertsayegh7944 2 года назад +5

    when I see earth curvature with my eyes then I will believe in gravity

  • @yutehube4468
    @yutehube4468 2 года назад +9

    Certainly not. Planes wouldn't even be able to land after taking off (if they flew North or South in any way).

    • @NathanOakley1980
      @NathanOakley1980 2 года назад +4

      Globe claims we have 15 degrees drift (stuff moving apart) as earth turns underneath stuff not attached! That DOES NOT HAPPEN! Nothing is drifting away at 1000mph on the equator. Earth isn’t spinning!

    • @NostyFripples
      @NostyFripples 2 года назад +2

      There would be floating hotels to chill in & wait for your destination to come to you if earth was really a 1000mph spinning testicle

    • @yutehube4468
      @yutehube4468 2 года назад +1

      @@NathanOakley1980 It's not about East and West though, momentum would be conserved that way, although I think there would be a little "nip" of like 1mm if you jumped up and landed again at the equator because the air can't carry you with perfect conserving of momentum. The deflection would only happen North and South.

    • @yutehube4468
      @yutehube4468 2 года назад +1

      @@NostyFripples If earth was rotating, ships sailing to the equator would use less fuel than ships sailing away from the equator, due to earth's centrifugal force.

    • @NostyFripples
      @NostyFripples 2 года назад

      @@yutehube4468 nah bro it’s because it’s always downhill 😆🤣

  • @willienelson8377
    @willienelson8377 2 года назад +7

    When there's a link to Wikipedia telling you to ignore this video. You know he's right on the money 💰

    • @joedoe2407
      @joedoe2407 2 года назад +2

      Thank you youtube!

  • @raincats2011
    @raincats2011 2 года назад +1

    Gaspard-Gustave looks like he just got a job at the local masonic lodge to try to prove rotation and again like with Foucault came up with the most ridiculous ideia! typical french humor! Thanks Eric!!

  • @anitaholman2799
    @anitaholman2799 2 года назад +7

    Nice Eric. Straight to the point.

  • @Zenic449
    @Zenic449 2 года назад +1

    Eric do you know anything about the great mudflood and tartarian empire conspiracy?

  • @SPIKE-0000
    @SPIKE-0000 2 года назад +4

    If earth rotated...[which it doesn't]...whether it spun or not...water would still go in one direction...It wouldn't change due to hemisphere differentials....

    • @SPIKE-0000
      @SPIKE-0000 2 года назад

      @@fredfarkle6347 So does water bend?...or does it maintain it's level. Many now argue, the natural physics of water...is that it always finds it's level...hence the term "Water Level"...and..."Sea Level" not..."Sea Curve"....Also research Samuel Robotham's experiment...and Airy's Failure experiment....That destroyed the rotation-claim...[despite feeble attempts to banish him from the scientific community]

    • @SPIKE-0000
      @SPIKE-0000 2 года назад

      @@fredfarkle6347 Show me "proof of claim" then, so I can pull it to pieces, cos I'll counter-claim straight away with actual evidence. So for the final time...The earth does not: Rotate/Spin/Move/Tilt Gravity is fake. Weight/Temperature/Buoyancy/Pressure all determine what falls/sinks/flies/floats etc. Mass for example is dependant on the component's of what it's made up of which will then determine it's "Density"...and "Weight"....The only time water will have shape is if it's in freefall as a drop...held by some sort of electromagnetism...or put into cylindrical-tube. Release it and water finds it's level...ALWAYS....

    • @SPIKE-0000
      @SPIKE-0000 2 года назад

      @@fredfarkle6347 On the sun...it's called: PERSEPECTIVE...as objects move further away, they get smaller...and smaller....simple!....

    • @SPIKE-0000
      @SPIKE-0000 2 года назад

      @@fredfarkle6347 Did you look at those links or the channel I mentioned to get all that yummy knowledge from?...I bet you didn't....All your questions will be answered step-by-step...video-by-video on Eric Dubay's channel simple
      ruclips.net/user/FlatEarthEric

  • @saltysergeant4284
    @saltysergeant4284 2 года назад +12

    I've been telling people this example for years. Some get it, some don't. It's really simple.
    #1: Throw a small object straight up in the air.
    #2: Watch it come back down in your hand from random directions.
    This disproves it every day. No sniper or helicopter needed. I use a lighter to show this. I throw it up outside. I throw it up inside. There is no difference. Inside a building, the atmosphere is sealed outside. No "spinning atmosphere" in a SEALED building, right? A simple object in our pocket shows the Earth doesn't spin.

    • @DTG_LOCKETT
      @DTG_LOCKETT 2 года назад +3

      You are physically incapable of throwing something straight up high enough for it to be effected by the coriolis effect

    • @toberrdrawforc
      @toberrdrawforc 2 года назад +4

      @@DTG_LOCKETT
      Exactly. No matter how high you throw it, the effect is never observed.

    • @memyselfandlewii8781
      @memyselfandlewii8781 2 года назад +2

      Hey, that makes me think about when I throw my drumstick up in the air it comes right back to the same spot.

    • @saltysergeant4284
      @saltysergeant4284 2 года назад +2

      @@memyselfandlewii8781 that's right. What is different about the bullet, the drumstick, or my lighter? Since it's a "global" effect, it either affects one or none. Especially in a building. No atmospheric drag to offset the actual spin of the Earth. When we test it, it's always the same. The object thrown does not fly sideways as soon as it leaves our hand, as it should. It's readily testable. Just throw something up in the air for even 4 seconds of airtime and you're beating the flight time of most sniper's rounds. It's pretty ridiculous that no one has noticed it.
      "Oh yeah, man! Sniper's have to calculate the Earth's spin!"
      "Why is this not observed in ANY other object? Long range artillery and sniper's rounds are magic? Why not vehicles of flight?"

    • @saltysergeant4284
      @saltysergeant4284 2 года назад +2

      @@DTG_LOCKETT I think you're missing the idea, Mr Dutch. The real point is that a sniper's bullet has to calculate the Earth's spin, because the spin is fast. The reason they give for this is that the bullet is no longer touching anything else that's touching the Earth. Bullet in gun, gun held by dude, dude standing on Earth. Once fired, the round is free, so the bullet is flying straight, while the Earth spins underneath it. What is different about anything else on Earth? AS SOON as anything drops from a hand, is thrown, or blown over, the object should have that few seconds of Earth spin, just like the bullet. The distance doesn't matter. It's the principle of an object being "free of the Earth".

  • @RutyshFE
    @RutyshFE 2 года назад +7

    обнял брат, начало хаоса для прекращения пробуждения . Прорвёмся!

    • @insider3273
      @insider3273 2 года назад +2

      Пробуждение неизбежно

    • @RutyshFE
      @RutyshFE 2 года назад

      @@insider3273 по луне у меня на канале все личные съёмки ... Что луна перевернулась видео с Маском И на картинке , назвал для обывателей . Либрация и прецессия прикрученные термины совсем к другим факторам... Обнял брат инсайдер...

  • @rickymcmahon3397
    @rickymcmahon3397 2 года назад +1

    Eric can you put the link up for your video on the hollowhox I cant find it 👍

  • @davincidanielson928
    @davincidanielson928 2 года назад +1

    Toilets and such are manufactured in compliance with where they are to be used. It says right on them.

  • @beyondthecrownband3417
    @beyondthecrownband3417 2 года назад +1

    Yo, where did the moon landing proofs video go?

  • @sheldonjackson383
    @sheldonjackson383 2 года назад +22

    Eric, your videos are exceptional tools to wake people up to reality!
    Keep up the outstanding work!

  • @sashavjs
    @sashavjs 2 года назад +1

    Just wanted to say RIP Jordan Maxwell and thank you Eric Dubay for guiding me to him - one of a kind, a beautiful mind.

  • @2st_duallist
    @2st_duallist 2 года назад +3

    all cultures from the corners of earth knew above the firmament is where the creator resides, so to speak. and everybody knew we were part of something bigger and as every creation, with a purpose.
    then heliocentrism literally turned the whole concept inside-out. putting everyone drifting aimlesly into an infinite void where everything could end any time for whatever menace from space.
    also they created a system on earth where everyone is slowly pulled towards total dehumanization in a way or another.
    people worship all this without even knowing it, mock whoever do not agree and become easily aggressive when challenged in their beliefs system.
    it is as simple and evil as that.

  • @jacoblaw3534
    @jacoblaw3534 2 года назад +17

    Awesome to have this at hand, thank you.

  • @jakeM-y4c
    @jakeM-y4c 2 года назад +2

    I agree, the water will drain opposite side from which it enters the bowl or sink. That is just nonsense

  • @bdub3871
    @bdub3871 2 года назад

    I must say, there are videos of guys down on the equator that actually pure the water in the sink and put a divider down inside sink & allow the water to settle before they drain the water. And yes, the water drains opposite pending on which side of equator they are on. Just wanted to point that out. I am a huge skeptic with a round earth.
    Keep up the great videos

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +3

      Yes, because they use three different basins, rather than a portable sink. The latter method the effect is caused by the water's angle of entry, the former method it is caused by the shape of the basin: ruclips.net/video/pWc9SfwnSxM/видео.html It has nothing to do with being a few meters on either side of the equator and even mainstream science admits this. These are just simple parlor tricks used to draw tourists.

    • @neverwinta7702
      @neverwinta7702 2 года назад

      @@FlatEarthEric thanks Eric

  • @kangjames2492
    @kangjames2492 2 года назад +6

    Love you man, keep up the good work. They are really trying hard to undermine you though. Every time I watch one of your videos they automatically follow it up with a video that promotes the ball earth lie. It's so obvious an deliberate.

  • @maryatsealevel2
    @maryatsealevel2 2 года назад +7

    wow that sneaky sink trick probably makes them lots of tips 😆
    that must mean they know the way to do it for the show so they know coriolis is a scam.what a buncha scammers!!

    • @memyselfandlewii8781
      @memyselfandlewii8781 2 года назад

      Can't stand scammers! But hey there are so many suckers, can ya blame em 😜

  • @PreciseDiff
    @PreciseDiff 2 года назад +3

    Just let it sink in

  • @naturalmystic5098
    @naturalmystic5098 2 года назад +3

    It's Crazy how people would rather get a High with an "outer space fantasy" over the Truth. . Wow. .

  • @jeremysimmons2005
    @jeremysimmons2005 2 года назад +3

    It is stationary and it is a plane flat and fixed we are the center of the creation

  • @otisimus1520
    @otisimus1520 2 года назад +1

    i have heard people say that the stars in the northern hemisphere spin the opposite way to those in the southern hemisphere proveing the earth is a ball what is the truth regarding this theory ???? i am only able to watch the stars in the north and have found no evidence to prove or disprove this theory, please help.

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +1

      All stars rotate the same direction East to West. Depending where you are standing and what direction facing, they have the appearance of rotating differently, but are all actually going the same direction:
      How the Southern Stars Work on Flat Earth: ruclips.net/video/ADNeFSuKnqM/видео.html
      “Another thing is certain, that from within the equator the north pole star, and the constellations Ursa Major, Ursa Minor, and many others, can be seen from every meridian simultaneously; whereas in the south, from the equator, neither the so-called south pole star, nor the remarkable constellation of the Southern Cross, can be seen simultaneously from every meridian, showing that all the constellations of the south - pole star included - sweep over a great southern arc and across the meridian, from their rise in the evening to their setting in the morning. But if the earth is a globe, Sigma Octantis, a south pole star, and the Southern Cross, a southern circumpolar constellation, they would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude, as is the case with the northern pole star and the northern circumpolar constellations. Such, however, is not the case.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (286) ericdubay.wordpress.com/2018/07/11/the-fixed-pole-star/

  • @benjmin54321
    @benjmin54321 2 года назад +4

    Put more stuff on liked video playlist please- thx 🙏

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +3

      Glad you are enjoying it, will do, thanks

  • @perseuskasa6731
    @perseuskasa6731 2 года назад +7

    The one example I really like is the Helicopter hovering for hours in the atmosphere. They say everything moves in synch with the atmosphere yet the helicopter purpose is to do the exact opposite 😂😂😂. Think about that…it is a machine build to move independently to its surroundings 😂😂😂

  • @carolinerogers8600
    @carolinerogers8600 2 года назад +1

    We would have to live on a rolling pin (long cylinder) for time accuracy to remain intact at the poles

  • @pt.2102
    @pt.2102 2 года назад +2

    what about hurricanes

  • @himawari8337
    @himawari8337 2 года назад +1

    And yet they say pendulums precess.
    Faster away from the equator, and different directions whether north and south. Is this even true?

  • @melchizedek144
    @melchizedek144 2 года назад +5

    Hahaha the clown ball effect! Another great video brother! 🙏💖

  • @travislovelace7619
    @travislovelace7619 2 года назад +2

    The fact that he had to make this video to explain to this to people makes me sad

  • @LouC518
    @LouC518 2 года назад +1

    Eric what about the battleships? wouldn't they have equipment to compensate for the coriolois effect? I doubt they do. I think their shells flew like 27 miles.

  • @ricardoabreu9707
    @ricardoabreu9707 2 года назад +2

    In another breaking news the earth is flat not a ball 🏀.

  • @edgewyze7352
    @edgewyze7352 2 года назад +2

    I get a kick out globees that say "no, I don't trust the government"

  • @laws9838
    @laws9838 2 года назад +2

    Another great video and easily understood if you just think about all the garbage taught to us in school. Everything we were taught about physics just doesn't apply at all when it comes to the blue space testicle.

  • @johncaseyglendinning3078
    @johncaseyglendinning3078 2 года назад +2

    They lie about the heavens. As above so below.

  • @thomasberry1772
    @thomasberry1772 2 года назад +2

    Eric Dubay is a God...

  • @bizarre3402
    @bizarre3402 2 года назад +1

    Can i put arabic subtitle on ur videos?

  • @Alex-xy2rs
    @Alex-xy2rs 2 года назад +1

    Rifle barrels are bored in a spiral fashion so to create a spin on a bullet as it follows its trajectory throughout the barrel. This creates a straighter, more accurate flight as it exits the barrel for longer distances.
    However, just like the quarterback spinning the ball when he throws it or the corner kick taker putting spin on the ball when kicks it, the ball will always curve inward to the direction of the tighter, faster curve. This is the magnum effect, not coriolis effect

  • @Rasik24
    @Rasik24 2 года назад +6

    Truth truth

  • @paulcary1862
    @paulcary1862 2 года назад +1

    Let's be clear of this; The Earth is not At the Center of everything. It is the center of everything

  • @andyolsensovereignbeing.6211
    @andyolsensovereignbeing.6211 2 года назад +4

    Never realised how many stupid people there were on this plane until 2020.

    • @rogiba5115
      @rogiba5115 2 года назад

      yeaaa the corona virus shows me how many they are

  • @carolinerogers8600
    @carolinerogers8600 2 года назад +1

    I dont know if this has been mentioned in any flat plane defenses in the past, But the Creator showed me this the other day studying shadows. Our watches are calibrated for the equator. Rounded down and for math simplicity, the earth is supposedly 24k miles in circumference , and light is covering the earth at the rate of 1000 miles per hr. (earth spinning ccw, sun stationary) The usa is on the 30's latitude. For ease of innerstanding, imagine the usa at the equator. At approx. 3k miles across, 8 usa's will fit around the equator. It takes 3 hr for light to travel across the usa. I have to wait 3 hrs to call my friend in California after I awake at sunrise in Virginia. At the 60th latitude the diameter of the circle is half (12k miles circumference) This is where russia and other countries are located. Move the usa there to the 60th. 4 usa's now fit in the circle. Because the circle is half size, rotating the same speed as the equator, it will take 6hrs for light to travel across the usa because 500 miles of land p/hr are lit up instead of 1000 miles of land per hour at the equator. So if we are on a spinning ball, you will need a different watch at the 60th lat to say what the watch did at the equator. Here in Arkansas where I am watch time is 29 minutes off from true sun time. now its 1hr29 min off with DST. The closer to the north pole you get the worse it gets, the lines are tapered(longitude)peace, Ed

  • @madscrillaog5703
    @madscrillaog5703 2 года назад

    Keep up the good work. Do u have any videos with explanations for the eclipses. I kno the official reason doesn’t make sense but what is a possible explanation?

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/0-N0TloYHr8/видео.html
      ericdubay.wordpress.com/2018/07/11/total-eclipse-of-the-mind/
      ifers.123.st/t65-rahu-the-black-sun

  • @Bbbmurr
    @Bbbmurr 2 года назад +4

    shouldn't it be faster to travel around the world by just hovering above the ground in a helicopter? airplanes travel around 700 mph the earth travels at 1000 mph

  • @sarahX..
    @sarahX.. 2 года назад +3

    it`s just all so obvious and simply common sense - wow some people still even believe rubbish like coriolis effect ??? gosh lol

  • @jwedges
    @jwedges 2 года назад +8

    "can't have it both ways" nice conclusion

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +4

      They really can't. They have to claim the atmosphere spins along with the Earth to explain why we can't hover in helicopters waiting for our destinations to come to us. But when they make that claim, they automatically shoot themselves in the foot with a sniper bullet.

    • @jwedges
      @jwedges 2 года назад +1

      Makes no sense what they claim the atmosphere does. Especially where it meets the "vacuum of space" but doesn't get sucked away.

    • @joedoe2407
      @joedoe2407 2 года назад +1

      Yes, it also disproves the ball earth "scientific" model regardless of whether the flat earth model is true or not. The two are entirely independent.

  • @OmkaraHellcore
    @OmkaraHellcore 2 года назад +2

    Hi Eric,
    Thank you for your videos. It wasn't until videos like these that I seriously started to give the flat earth concept the benefit of my doubts.
    That being said, I was wondering if you have a video on, or at least an idea, on what might be outside the "firmament"?
    Decades ago a grew up with stuff like Star Wars and all sorts of star travelling fantasy which I now no longer can connect with the way that I used to.
    While this maybe childish yes, I wonder if the waters outside the firmament can still be traversed or that travelling to another plane is limited to the other 8 realms connected through Ygdrassil?
    It's a long shot, but if anybody could give me an interesting answer it would be you.

    • @FlatEarthEric
      @FlatEarthEric  2 года назад +2

      Thanks Omkara, we are still waiting for empirical evidence that such a thing as a "firmament" actually exists or not. There is some circumstantial evidence and historical hearsay that suggests it may exist, but without independent exploration of the Antarctic and beyond forbidden by the Antarctic Treaty, humanity is being kept from being able to confirm or deny such speculations.

    • @OmkaraHellcore
      @OmkaraHellcore 2 года назад +2

      @@FlatEarthEric Thank you for replying Eric. This reply leads me to wonder if you by chance have seen those "documentaries" by Ewaranon. While he emphasizes to research everything he presents yourself, he does show some footage which might be a nod to the potential firmament, like footage of 2 individual rockets that seem to "scrape" the firmament after which something I could potentially describe as water is shown to cause ripples. Another piece of footage shows a rocket with a GoPro attached to it, stop in high air, which might be caused by the firmament. I know it's speculation. It made me wonder if the "Great Rift" or the "Milky Way" is perhaps an attempt from the past to rupture the firmament, causing the flood and leaving a massive "scar".

    • @basedtruther1020
      @basedtruther1020 2 года назад

      @@OmkaraHellcore you got a link to that footage of the firmament?

    • @spacemonkey1776
      @spacemonkey1776 2 года назад +2

      @@basedtruther1020 same request

    • @basedtruther1020
      @basedtruther1020 2 года назад +1

      @@spacemonkey1776 ruclips.net/video/1xmw1cvaCrU/видео.html
      Go to 2 hours and 27 mins

  • @lisshawke
    @lisshawke 2 года назад +1

    Hammering away Eric you´re so annoying the freemasons the way your work is seeping into the collective psyche - I´m on a telegram group with about 60,000 Aussie people and I reckon about 5% of them are genuine flat earthers from what I can tell by comments. It actually really surprises me and I think thats a lot more than I would have assumed would wake up in just a few years. If we just wait, everyone might one day learn, but I am so thankful you never stop and wait. Love to you and yours I´ll never repay you for all you have done and all the peace you have brought to the realm by exposing truth. I nearly punched a guy in the street this morning cause I dumped on him earth is flat too fast and he had to run away. How original

  • @SpiritLightBody
    @SpiritLightBody 2 года назад +2

    Wholeness brother 🤗😇

  • @MalcolmXpat
    @MalcolmXpat 2 года назад +4

    The longest range sniper shot recorded was a distance of 3,540 Meters (2.1 miles). the bullet travelled at 792 mph (average speed) and took 10 seconds to reach the target..
    If the Earth was spinning at 1000 mph and the bullet took 10 seconds to reach the target it would mean the target would have moved by 4600 meters (2.8 miles) This is assuming the shot was fired longitudinal from the equator, granted if there was such a thing as Coriolis effect inertia would have some effect however it would be impossible to calculate and no sniper allows for such thing.
    Snipers do not account for any coriolis effect.
    Only Globe Earthers claim the Earth is affected by a coriolis effect as as when it suits them.

  • @steenkoud
    @steenkoud 2 года назад +2

    3:20 I remember that website! They deleted the Azimuthal Equidistant map because it made too much sense!