0:00 Intro 0:43 “I want to congratulate Germany for the win” | Verdict on Germany 2-0 Denmark 3:20 What does Denmark need to compete in that level? 5:37 Denmark Attack 7:58 VAR 9:22 Worried about thunderstorms? 10:22 Referee 11:32 Denmark National team future 14:01 Alexander Bah Performances __ Outro
@LKRNCK of course he would be happy if var was in his favour. Just as Germany team probably was. It's not fair when a player is running optimal with arms swinging, as is a normal way to run and the ball hits his hand at 100 mph. He can't defend at his best with arms at the side while in full sprint. Var offside is ridiculous too. It's impossible for strikers to judge body parts by centimeters while trying to stay onside. There need to be a bigger margin and handball need to be a clear and obvious handball. Saying this as a football fan not a Danish fan,
@@LKRNCKAs a Dane i agree with you... Its very childish of him... Handball decision is ok... And they offside is spot on... And then he have to Bitch about it... What a joke.. Alot of Danes Hope He get fired... Me included 👌
@@ritchiebaxter627 the offside is spot on and There was Handball So i Really dont get your point 😂 Remember Im a Dane 🤫 The football law is the law... Why bitch about it afterwards?😂
The offside goal was an offside. Doesn’t matter by how much. Now that they have brought in the technology once you’re off you’re off. Penalty is a joke. Hand ball should only ever be called if its clearly not ball to hand or if there’s an obvious outstretched arm. That’s not hard to judge. That said, the Danes didn’t win a match and Hojland had so many chances against Germany. Deserved to go out
Surely, offside is the one thing we can all agree on that there is no grey area. Either you're offside or onside, whether it's by 1 metre or 1 centimetre. Offside is offside. As tight as that was, he's offside. If being offside by one centimeter still counts as onside we create a grey area, and where does that grey area begin and end?
You can use technology in a different way. The handball technology is absurd. When a player is running all you have to do is shoot the ball at the hands. The offsides should have a margin of error, because the technology cannot pinpoint 4 cm each way, that should be the margin of error
@@ronnie5329 If we play that rule 30years, and it becomes a normal move, people would consider it "greatly done" if an attacker manages to hit the defenders hand on purpose and it would be part of the game. Just like shooting at an enemy bouncing offfield to get the corner.
@@dontanton7775 What are you talking about?! Raum was NOT aiming at Andersen's hand....he was just trying to cross the ball! The same scenario happened when Belgium played their first game of the tournament against Slovakia & lost the match 1-0. The Belgium winger Openda made an appearant assist to Lukaku who scored a goal in the 87th min of the match.....but after the ref looked at the VAR screeen, he could see that Openda had ever-so-slightly touched the ball with his hand, and then he ruled it a hand ball foul instead of a Belgium goal. That is despite the fact that the ball's trajectory never actually changed from his accidental touching of the ball by his own hand!
these kind of blocks happen in every other match, he's not running at him, just standing, goal should've been allowed, but yeh, then all the other questionable decisions are correct too I guess
I think Kasper is doing a great job for so many years now. Danemark dealt so well with Germans after first 15-20minutes . Germans looked really really lost untill that controversial desisions .
Regarding the offside ruling, Kasper Hjulmand is completely wrong!!! The technology is now so precise that it is 100% certain that the Dane was offside when the ball was played and the goal was rightly disallowed. There is a censor in the ball that detects every movement of the ball and 12 cameras in the stadium that track the position of the ball and the players 50 times per second. On the other hand, there is broad agreement that the "hand" rule must be changed.
I agree, that VAR especially in case of offside rule is a mess. A few millimeters were certainly not the reason for implementing the offside into football games. VAR can make the game more fair, but it can also destroy it, thats what happened last night.
The margin of error with the technology is 4 cm, so i dont know why Uefa calls a toenail offside, its absurd, use technology but have a margin of error@@LKRNCK
Regarding the offside ruling, Kasper Hjulmand is completely wrong!!! The technology is now so precise that it is 100% certain that the Dane was offside when the ball was played and the goal was rightly disallowed. There is a censor in the ball that detects every movement of the ball and 12 cameras in the stadium that track the position of the ball and the players 50 times per second. On the other hand, there is broad agreement that the "hand" rule must be changed.
I don't think so. Most defenders have their arms on the back - for a reason! And everyone knows: If you get shot your hand, even from 1 m, the opponent will get a penalty.
@@LKRNCK the interpretation of the rules are made by people who haven't played the game. As a defender you can't change your body shape that quickly and you can't defend properly with your hands behind your back. I not saying they were wrong for giving the penalty, it's the interpretation that is wrong.
It was amateurish by Anderson, he was clearly still pissed about the correctly disallowed goal. But the rules don't care if you're pissed and not concentrated.
Stop destroying the game with these over-zealous use of VAR. Offsides cannot be made by toenails. It has to be clear and obvious. Handballs cannot be given if the ball's direction was barely changed and did not affect anything of the attacker.
It was offside, where is the problem with correct decisions? Just because you "feel" a decision is right or wrong doesn't make it right or wrong. I was sick of the football that was just random, which was before VAR. But I get it, if I was a dirty team, I would also prefer no VAR.
Same thing happened in the Belgium/Slovakia match! The Belgian winger Openda touched the ball with his hand, yet the trajectory of the ball never changed.....but the ref made the decision to disallow the Belgian goal in the 87th min of the match! A hand ball is a hand ball no matter what!
But how many cm would you say is still OK? Where would be the cut off? 5cm? 10cm? 12cm? So 12cm would be onside, but 13cm would be offside? It would be the same situation as it is now lol.
Thanks for mentioning Croatia. Talent hard work never die attitude some luck and Denmark will be good. Denmark didn't had someone in the final third to knock out opponents and we Croats don't have. So key is up what I said. Look Switzerland they hired old guy to help Murat and now Switzerland play is quantum jump from before if you looked their games.
VAR should be used only if the leg/foot of the attacker is visibly after the line of the defender's position. Because we use feet to move forward, not hands, elbows, heads. It's only logical. And I also agree about the handball: if it doesn't modify the trajectory of the ball, then it should be ignored.
Well what you think is completely irrelevant because the rules have been this way for many years. If these decisions had gone in favour of his team this coach would not be saying any of this. It’s only when your own team is on the receiving end of a VAR call that people are up in arms again.. despite nothing tangibly changing for years
The only decision, which was not correct, was to deny the goal by Schlotterbeck. Denmark was very luck, that Germany was unable to score three times more as they did. I am not convinced that Germany will win the title.
well, if you go after the man rather than the ball, then it is a foul and Kimmich did just that, clear and obvious foul. ppl will say "oh he couldnt have reached the man anyway so it wasnt a foul" but that isnt the issue, it is a very very simply question, did Kimmich go after the man? and if the answer is "yes" then its a foul
Offside is clear, 1m or 1cm Offside is offside. I totally understand the point, that the penalty was very unlucky and a petty decision. But the German goal in the 3rd min was also petty. In my opinion they were not in the best shape and Germany made a lot more to win the match. However unlucky day for Danmark. But Germany not won undeservedly.
I don’t think many disagree. However, when we know that the statistical error margin of VAR is 3-4cm and VAR says it was 1cm offside, then it’s of course problematic to rely on VAR, especially if the ref did not call it.
This translation some places are close to criminal. The very precise explanations he make are lost in translation. I want VAR on that translation, so to speak.....!
This game was BLATANT ROBBERY. That toenail off-side was ridiculous. Probably the technology error margin is over 5 cm considering you have to consider 3 different bodies in motion: the ball at the moment it is hit, the last defender, and the forward. Next time they´re going to call off-side because a piece of the shoe´s sewing thread is off-side.
Nobody talks about how it is possible to influence the VAR. One can easily manipulate digital images to fit with whatever outcome is wished for. If the VAR calls for a check then it's only a matter of milliseconds between offside and onside, easily tweakable. Just forward or rewind a millisecond and choose what you like best. Hence a toe nail 😂
@@dontanton7775 maybe the point is that a toe should not be offside. The error margin usually means that if it's within that margin then it can't be proven to be a fault. One milliseconde rewind and it's not offside. The technology is not holy and the rules should be clear. Because why would it take VAR so long to come to a decision in many cases? The game of football is not becoming more fun in my opinion, but more frustrating
@@bf1716 Irrelevant. Once you put a new number into the rule, that new number suffers from the same inaccuracies you claim exist as the current number (which is 0 atm). This is a purely psychological perception thing. There is no difference judging between 1cm foot plus error or 5cm plus error. You just shift the discussion from "was it really offsite" to "was it really 5cm offsite to count"? And the second point still stands: If you don't trust the VAR, you can just respond: Well before people didn't trust the ref. And in decades of football/soccer there a gazillion examples where a ref did the wrong thing or seemed to have been bribed. So that point is also moot. Because it doesn't matter if you don't trust the VAR or if you don't trust the ref. Either you do, or you don't. There is no logical arguement anywhere to be made. It's pure perceptional psychology, cause people feel that way.
Regarding the offside ruling, Kasper Hjulmand is completely wrong!!! The technology is now so precise that it is 100% certain that the Dane was offside when the ball was played and the goal was rightly disallowed. There is a censor in the ball that detects every movement of the ball and 12 cameras in the stadium that track the position of the ball and the players 50 times per second. On the other hand, there is broad agreement that the "hand" rule must be changed.
You can use technology in a different way. The handball technology is absurd. When a player is running all you have to do is shoot the ball at the hands. The offsides should have a margin of error, because the technology cannot pinpoint 4 cm each way, that should be the margin of error
Fifa should review the penalty rules hand ball again..the hands should be the palm & finger areas & below the elbow area ..above the elbow the arm should not be a penalty..this make football the most stupid games or sports in the world for that kind of situation..
Good to see Premier league failures being sent in to ruin the game. I sympathise with the Danes (and the Germans) for the utter chaos and crap we send in from the PGMOL - 3 English refs and one Italian ruined the game
offside is really a simple question: who was closer to the goal, attacker of defender. it doesn't matter by what margin. if we accept VAR, then there is no discussion. alternatively, you can go back to the time before VAR, where terrible mistakes by refs decided games. which is fairer now? it's a decision by the football community at large, but then don't complain when you get what you voted for.
Everyone on that pitch including the referee & 2 linesmen saw the attacker & defender being next to each other. Why is the video assistance referee interfering? The attacker had no advantage. It's a spectator sport. Stopping the game in its tracks for tiny margins like this which cannot be perceived by any human on the pitch is terrible. Besides the attacker can't eyeball a 2cm difference in the heat of the moment. It incentivizes the attacker to stay behind the defender by a large margin, to not get caught by 3cm. VAR is damaging when used for nit-picking.
Don't agree. The central referee on the pitch has VAR as a guideline, not as a final decision. I think it is clear that Andersens moves was all natural, After all, he's not a penguin!
Nah offside is offside. Whether its 1mm or 100. I have no issues with it. The handball was tough though, unfortunate, but by the letter of the rule it was probably the right call.
Does VR really make football fairer? I don't see it that way. As in this case, sometimes it's a matter of microseconds, but is the technology sufficiently precise? At what microsecond is a pass a pass? It used to be said “in doubt for the striker”! Of course there were often wrong decisions, but they were human and there were consequences for bad referees. Now it's getting pretty absurd, it's about the tip of the hair on the fingernail, which may have somehow touched the ball. All these video reviews take away some of the positive, emotional aspects of football, and that's a shame. Above all, how far do you want to push the technical game? I feel sorry for the Danes because they have clearly become victims of technology here.
Ahahaha to Blair VAR after that humiliation is really embarrassing…. Not good losers … Germany was the way better team and there are the same var rules for everybody. Everybody accepts it so he has to do it too. + Germany got a VAR disallowed goal too that was skeptical ….
So we got the technology to tell if it’s a legal or illegal goal but we shouldn’t use it that way ? What are we supposed to do ? Say okay if it’s 1 cm we count the goal no matter it is offside and we can prove it ? Sound hella stupid to me cause you are playing for millions of dollars so we have to be 100% correct. And we are he only dislikes it cause Denmark couldn’t score a legal goal. They weren’t close to winning they could have condensed 7 goals.
Id be more pissed off with the offside. Its ridiculous. Its not humanly possible for players to have the ability to keep onside by centimeters. They should bring back the one foot margin. I feel sry for Denmark 🇩🇰
So next time the Dart WC, the players can just stand anywhere they want. I dont understand how someone cannot understand that sports is ALL about regarding the rules with no tolerance area. That would be playing around, not sports. Sports is competitive. "Oh they can't possibly..." oh yeah they can. Just stand a foot behind the last 2 players of the opposing team. No rule says you have to stand on the offside line. .
@ssm445 Darts is very slow paced. No good reason they can't follow the rules behind the line. Fifa have already played around with the margins. They made the margin smaller. Since it's a fast paced game then the margin should be bigger like it was before. 1 toe, 1 foot, 1 hands width, players can't cheat the systems still. Isn't offside to stop strikes having a unfair advantage or goal hanging? 1 toe or 1 foot is hardy a advantage
@ritchiebaxter627 🙄 can't you understanding that there HAS to be a fixed line. It doesn't matter if darts is slower or not. The player has to stay behind a line, period. If speed would matter, yeah, this tennis ball was just of an inch, let's say it was not outside, I mean, that was just a toes width... If you have a big toe, stay a toe behind. If this didn't give you an advantage, a toe behind will not give you a disadvantage. The rules are clear. There is no "roundabout", "circa" or "roughly" in that rule.
@ssm445 @ssm445 Do you understand that the line was thicker at one point? It gave a little more room for error. It's been changed once and they can do it again.. For your information, many managers are asking for a review of var. No point badgering on about laws to me. I know the laws of the game and I know the laws of var have changed over time. So I'm saying they can do it again
Regarding the offside ruling, Kasper Hjulmand is completely wrong!!! The technology is now so precise that it is 100% certain that the Dane was offside when the ball was played and the goal was rightly disallowed. There is a censor in the ball that detects every movement of the ball and 12 cameras in the stadium that track the position of the ball and the players 50 times per second. On the other hand, there is broad agreement that the "hand" rule must be changed.
0:00 Intro
0:43 “I want to congratulate Germany for the win” | Verdict on Germany 2-0 Denmark
3:20 What does Denmark need to compete in that level?
5:37 Denmark Attack
7:58 VAR
9:22 Worried about thunderstorms?
10:22 Referee
11:32 Denmark National team future
14:01 Alexander Bah Performances
__
Outro
I completely agree with him football shouldn’t become a virtual check show
Ah, yes. But if he won it, the VAR would be a great technic.
You can't deny, that it makes football fairer. No discussions.
@LKRNCK of course he would be happy if var was in his favour. Just as Germany team probably was.
It's not fair when a player is running optimal with arms swinging, as is a normal way to run and the ball hits his hand at 100 mph. He can't defend at his best with arms at the side while in full sprint. Var offside is ridiculous too. It's impossible for strikers to judge body parts by centimeters while trying to stay onside.
There need to be a bigger margin and handball need to be a clear and obvious handball. Saying this as a football fan not a Danish fan,
@@LKRNCKAs a Dane i agree with you... Its very childish of him...
Handball decision is ok...
And they offside is spot on...
And then he have to Bitch about it... What a joke..
Alot of Danes Hope He get fired... Me included 👌
@@Rubberduck-zt8lm surly you don't agree with var stuff. Yes the Danish manager could have handled the interview better but he has a point.
@@ritchiebaxter627 the offside is spot on and There was Handball So i Really dont get your point 😂
Remember Im a Dane 🤫
The football law is the law...
Why bitch about it afterwards?😂
The offside goal was an offside. Doesn’t matter by how much. Now that they have brought in the technology once you’re off you’re off. Penalty is a joke. Hand ball should only ever be called if its clearly not ball to hand or if there’s an obvious outstretched arm. That’s not hard to judge. That said, the Danes didn’t win a match and Hojland had so many chances against Germany. Deserved to go out
If you whine on this one, than the Schlotterbeck goal should‘ve counted as well.
It's not the same that 3d image is fake asf 😂 clear goal and spain will destroy you
@@dadodjurovic8206 Go cry
@@elxxpapi6326next week yr going . Mama! 😭
@@dadodjurovic8206 …also your mum
Are you stupid?
The bad thing about VAR is that I throw away my beer every time and then I have to get a new one and the score is still 0:0
Haha 😂
Surely, offside is the one thing we can all agree on that there is no grey area. Either you're offside or onside, whether it's by 1 metre or 1 centimetre. Offside is offside. As tight as that was, he's offside. If being offside by one centimeter still counts as onside we create a grey area, and where does that grey area begin and end?
When everyone accept VAR then we will have to accept its technology whether it's 1centiimetre or less or more than that,
What if the error of margin is stated to be 2-4cm...?
The translator does translate that he mentions this.
You can use technology in a different way. The handball technology is absurd. When a player is running all you have to do is shoot the ball at the hands. The offsides should have a margin of error, because the technology cannot pinpoint 4 cm each way, that should be the margin of error
There could be a tolerance from 10cm
@@ronnie5329 If we play that rule 30years, and it becomes a normal move, people would consider it "greatly done" if an attacker manages to hit the defenders hand on purpose and it would be part of the game. Just like shooting at an enemy bouncing offfield to get the corner.
@@dontanton7775 What are you talking about?! Raum was NOT aiming at Andersen's hand....he was just trying to cross the ball!
The same scenario happened when Belgium played their first game of the tournament against Slovakia & lost the match 1-0.
The Belgium winger Openda made an appearant assist to Lukaku who scored a goal in the 87th min of the match.....but after the ref looked at the VAR screeen, he could see that Openda had ever-so-slightly touched the ball with his hand, and then he ruled it a hand ball foul instead of a Belgium goal.
That is despite the fact that the ball's trajectory never actually changed from his accidental touching of the ball by his own hand!
I still don't know why the first goal for Germany was disallowed?
Over the back foul
That was done so that game remains interesting and not one sided
@@chainsawman-hell666 It was a clear block, and was a foul. No way that goal could be allowed.
Someone blocked a player from marking
these kind of blocks happen in every other match, he's not running at him, just standing, goal should've been allowed, but yeh, then all the other questionable decisions are correct too I guess
I think Kasper is doing a great job for so many years now.
Danemark dealt so well with Germans after first 15-20minutes . Germans looked really really lost untill that controversial desisions .
Regarding the offside ruling, Kasper Hjulmand is completely wrong!!! The technology is now so precise that it is 100% certain that the Dane was offside when the ball was played and the goal was rightly disallowed. There is a censor in the ball that detects every movement of the ball and 12 cameras in the stadium that track the position of the ball and the players 50 times per second. On the other hand, there is broad agreement that the "hand" rule must be changed.
I agree, that VAR especially in case of offside rule is a mess. A few millimeters were certainly not the reason for implementing the offside into football games. VAR can make the game more fair, but it can also destroy it, thats what happened last night.
But were is the limit? Should we tolerate 1 cm? What about 1.5 cm? The VAR makes football fairer.
The margin of error with the technology is 4 cm, so i dont know why Uefa calls a toenail offside, its absurd, use technology but have a margin of error@@LKRNCK
Offside is. Offside
Regarding the offside ruling, Kasper Hjulmand is completely wrong!!! The technology is now so precise that it is 100% certain that the Dane was offside when the ball was played and the goal was rightly disallowed. There is a censor in the ball that detects every movement of the ball and 12 cameras in the stadium that track the position of the ball and the players 50 times per second. On the other hand, there is broad agreement that the "hand" rule must be changed.
They need to stop with all these hand ball decisions at close range. The cross was too close to the defenders for him to get his hand out the way.
I don't think so. Most defenders have their arms on the back - for a reason! And everyone knows: If you get shot your hand, even from 1 m, the opponent will get a penalty.
@@LKRNCK the interpretation of the rules are made by people who haven't played the game. As a defender you can't change your body shape that quickly and you can't defend properly with your hands behind your back. I not saying they were wrong for giving the penalty, it's the interpretation that is wrong.
Hand ball is hand ball
@@samreimann4233 But the rules are clearly, every defender knows them.
Hjulmand's reaction is embarassing.
It was amateurish by Anderson, he was clearly still pissed about the correctly disallowed goal. But the rules don't care if you're pissed and not concentrated.
Stop destroying the game with these over-zealous use of VAR.
Offsides cannot be made by toenails. It has to be clear and obvious.
Handballs cannot be given if the ball's direction was barely changed and did not affect anything of the attacker.
Exactly, plus what advantages do you get from centimeters or even milimeters, ridiculous
It was offside, where is the problem with correct decisions? Just because you "feel" a decision is right or wrong doesn't make it right or wrong. I was sick of the football that was just random, which was before VAR. But I get it, if I was a dirty team, I would also prefer no VAR.
Same thing happened in the Belgium/Slovakia match!
The Belgian winger Openda touched the ball with his hand, yet the trajectory of the ball never changed.....but the ref made the decision to disallow the Belgian goal in the 87th min of the match!
A hand ball is a hand ball no matter what!
Don't mention the VAR.
But how many cm would you say is still OK? Where would be the cut off? 5cm? 10cm? 12cm? So 12cm would be onside, but 13cm would be offside? It would be the same situation as it is now lol.
Thanks for mentioning Croatia. Talent hard work never die attitude some luck and Denmark will be good. Denmark didn't had someone in the final third to knock out opponents and we Croats don't have. So key is up what I said. Look Switzerland they hired old guy to help Murat and now Switzerland play is quantum jump from before if you looked their games.
VAR should be used only if the leg/foot of the attacker is visibly after the line of the defender's position. Because we use feet to move forward, not hands, elbows, heads. It's only logical. And I also agree about the handball: if it doesn't modify the trajectory of the ball, then it should be ignored.
Well what you think is completely irrelevant because the rules have been this way for many years. If these decisions had gone in favour of his team this coach would not be saying any of this. It’s only when your own team is on the receiving end of a VAR call that people are up in arms again.. despite nothing tangibly changing for years
The only decision, which was not correct, was to deny the goal by Schlotterbeck. Denmark was very luck, that Germany was unable to score three times more as they did. I am not convinced that Germany will win the title.
well, if you go after the man rather than the ball, then it is a foul and Kimmich did just that, clear and obvious foul. ppl will say "oh he couldnt have reached the man anyway so it wasnt a foul" but that isnt the issue, it is a very very simply question, did Kimmich go after the man? and if the answer is "yes" then its a foul
What crap! If anything, Germany were the lucky one. Oliver was handing down all the calls to Germany
What are you talking about?! The germani did a rugby tackling
Offside is clear, 1m or 1cm Offside is offside. I totally understand the point, that the penalty was very unlucky and a petty decision. But the German goal in the 3rd min was also petty. In my opinion they were not in the best shape and Germany made a lot more to win the match. However unlucky day for Danmark.
But Germany not won undeservedly.
I don’t think many disagree. However, when we know that the statistical error margin of VAR is 3-4cm and VAR says it was 1cm offside, then it’s of course problematic to rely on VAR, especially if the ref did not call it.
This translation some places are close to criminal. The very precise explanations he make are lost in translation. I want VAR on that translation, so to speak.....!
Poor translation: what he says is that statistics show an error margin of 3-4cm using VAR, and this is 1 cm offside, which makes it a ridiculous call…
This game was BLATANT ROBBERY. That toenail off-side was ridiculous. Probably the technology error margin is over 5 cm considering you have to consider 3 different bodies in motion: the ball at the moment it is hit, the last defender, and the forward. Next time they´re going to call off-side because a piece of the shoe´s sewing thread is off-side.
Yes, VAR is killing Football..Its a Videogame now, 22 Humans against Video Cams.
I disagree....VAR is actually a good thing for Football!
Despite I was cheering for Denmark I don't see the offside for the 3rd German goal. Refs were terrible!
Nobody talks about how it is possible to influence the VAR. One can easily manipulate digital images to fit with whatever outcome is wished for. If the VAR calls for a check then it's only a matter of milliseconds between offside and onside, easily tweakable. Just forward or rewind a millisecond and choose what you like best.
Hence a toe nail 😂
You can also bribe the refereee. What's your point? Any system can be corrupted. Either you believe that the IFA people do their job or you don't.
@@dontanton7775 maybe the point is that a toe should not be offside. The error margin usually means that if it's within that margin then it can't be proven to be a fault. One milliseconde rewind and it's not offside.
The technology is not holy and the rules should be clear. Because why would it take VAR so long to come to a decision in many cases?
The game of football is not becoming more fun in my opinion, but more frustrating
@@bf1716 Irrelevant. Once you put a new number into the rule, that new number suffers from the same inaccuracies you claim exist as the current number (which is 0 atm). This is a purely psychological perception thing. There is no difference judging between 1cm foot plus error or 5cm plus error. You just shift the discussion from "was it really offsite" to "was it really 5cm offsite to count"?
And the second point still stands: If you don't trust the VAR, you can just respond: Well before people didn't trust the ref. And in decades of football/soccer there a gazillion examples where a ref did the wrong thing or seemed to have been bribed.
So that point is also moot. Because it doesn't matter if you don't trust the VAR or if you don't trust the ref. Either you do, or you don't.
There is no logical arguement anywhere to be made. It's pure perceptional psychology, cause people feel that way.
Regarding the offside ruling, Kasper Hjulmand is completely wrong!!! The technology is now so precise that it is 100% certain that the Dane was offside when the ball was played and the goal was rightly disallowed. There is a censor in the ball that detects every movement of the ball and 12 cameras in the stadium that track the position of the ball and the players 50 times per second. On the other hand, there is broad agreement that the "hand" rule must be changed.
People laughed at Arsene wenger when he said the offside rule should be changed
You can use technology in a different way. The handball technology is absurd. When a player is running all you have to do is shoot the ball at the hands. The offsides should have a margin of error, because the technology cannot pinpoint 4 cm each way, that should be the margin of error
You're being delusional Ronnie!
The disallowed German goal looked like they were in the NBA Finals 🤣
The head coach of Denmark is not called Kasper Højlund! - his name is Kasper Hjulmand ffs!
Fifa should review the penalty rules hand ball again..the hands should be the palm & finger areas & below the elbow area ..above the elbow the arm should not be a penalty..this make football the most stupid games or sports in the world for that kind of situation..
Totally ridiculous decisions by VAR.
It should be 4-0 if Kai Havertz scored all goals
Him and Sane idk when they get the ball they never score
….
Good to see Premier league failures being sent in to ruin the game. I sympathise with the Danes (and the Germans) for the utter chaos and crap we send in from the PGMOL - 3 English refs and one Italian ruined the game
offside is really a simple question: who was closer to the goal, attacker of defender. it doesn't matter by what margin. if we accept VAR, then there is no discussion. alternatively, you can go back to the time before VAR, where terrible mistakes by refs decided games. which is fairer now? it's a decision by the football community at large, but then don't complain when you get what you voted for.
Everyone on that pitch including the referee & 2 linesmen saw the attacker & defender being next to each other. Why is the video assistance referee interfering? The attacker had no advantage.
It's a spectator sport. Stopping the game in its tracks for tiny margins like this which cannot be perceived by any human on the pitch is terrible.
Besides the attacker can't eyeball a 2cm difference in the heat of the moment. It incentivizes the attacker to stay behind the defender by a large margin, to not get caught by 3cm.
VAR is damaging when used for nit-picking.
It would probably be a good idea if we say offside is only when it's 0,000000001 cm above 8,284491038 cm
It is exactly how var is supposed to be used 😂😂😂😂
Don't agree. The central referee on the pitch has VAR as a guideline, not as a final decision. I think it is clear that Andersens moves was all natural, After all, he's not a penguin!
Well, so tell me, how many toe length is a solid margin for offside? 😂
Someone said this guy looks like he drives an Audi A4 Estate 😅
Crazy 🤣
Doesnt matter denmark wouldnt go through
var is destroying all kind of games football, handball , just stop it
Nah offside is offside. Whether its 1mm or 100. I have no issues with it. The handball was tough though, unfortunate, but by the letter of the rule it was probably the right call.
Не is not Hojlund. Do your homework
Does VR really make football fairer? I don't see it that way. As in this case, sometimes it's a matter of microseconds, but is the technology sufficiently precise? At what microsecond is a pass a pass? It used to be said “in doubt for the striker”! Of course there were often wrong decisions, but they were human and there were consequences for bad referees. Now it's getting pretty absurd, it's about the tip of the hair on the fingernail, which may have somehow touched the ball. All these video reviews take away some of the positive, emotional aspects of football, and that's a shame. Above all, how far do you want to push the technical game? I feel sorry for the Danes because they have clearly become victims of technology here.
It is. Offside is offside
Cok hakli hoca
What an amateur host. Didnt even know the name of the coach.
bad translation and annoying
You are annoying. Why don't you just watch the original if you are danish?
Incredible that they didnt get a Dane to translate. But found a poor girl that doesnt have experience with this type of simultaneous translation.
German’s also Scored and was disallowed goal for Germany,So what are Complaining about…German’s are Superior against your team …Go Germany 🇩🇪
He like var but still complaining😅😅😅😅
442oons gonna be all over this😂😂
Bro nobody understand his language
About 6.000.000 people beg to differ
I was fuming last night with the VAR I felt so bad for Denmark, it totally swung the game for Germany. Another fiddle 💶
I was rooting for DK as well but the VAR rulings by the ref were legit! Germany won deservedly!
'NOT HOW WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE USING VAR!'
Sorry, isn't this EXACTLY how we're supposed to use it?
Danskjävel.
Basically dont celebrate anything anymore for 3 min because bros leg hair was gaining the opponent an advantage Gtfo xD
1cm offside is hardly a clear and obvious error by the on field official.
Thats 😂 Swedish dude ...
@@JacobVahrSvenningsen Mycket väl medveten om det då jag är svensk.
cry me a river
Ahahaha to Blair VAR after that humiliation is really embarrassing…. Not good losers … Germany was the way better team and there are the same var rules for everybody. Everybody accepts it so he has to do it too. + Germany got a VAR disallowed goal too that was skeptical ….
Euro bots are out in full force
Mertz Isle
So we got the technology to tell if it’s a legal or illegal goal but we shouldn’t use it that way ? What are we supposed to do ? Say okay if it’s 1 cm we count the goal no matter it is offside and we can prove it ? Sound hella stupid to me cause you are playing for millions of dollars so we have to be 100% correct. And we are he only dislikes it cause Denmark couldn’t score a legal goal. They weren’t close to winning they could have condensed 7 goals.
Id be more pissed off with the offside. Its ridiculous. Its not humanly possible for players to have the ability to keep onside by centimeters. They should bring back the one foot margin.
I feel sry for Denmark 🇩🇰
So next time the Dart WC, the players can just stand anywhere they want.
I dont understand how someone cannot understand that sports is ALL about regarding the rules with no tolerance area.
That would be playing around, not sports. Sports is competitive. "Oh they can't possibly..." oh yeah they can. Just stand a foot behind the last 2 players of the opposing team. No rule says you have to stand on the offside line.
.
@ssm445 Darts is very slow paced. No good reason they can't follow the rules behind the line. Fifa have already played around with the margins. They made the margin smaller. Since it's a fast paced game then the margin should be bigger like it was before. 1 toe, 1 foot, 1 hands width, players can't cheat the systems still.
Isn't offside to stop strikes having a unfair advantage or goal hanging? 1 toe or 1 foot is hardy a advantage
@ritchiebaxter627 🙄 can't you understanding that there HAS to be a fixed line. It doesn't matter if darts is slower or not. The player has to stay behind a line, period. If speed would matter, yeah, this tennis ball was just of an inch, let's say it was not outside, I mean, that was just a toes width...
If you have a big toe, stay a toe behind. If this didn't give you an advantage, a toe behind will not give you a disadvantage.
The rules are clear. There is no "roundabout", "circa" or "roughly" in that rule.
@ssm445 @ssm445 Do you understand that the line was thicker at one point? It gave a little more room for error. It's been changed once and they can do it again.. For your information, many managers are asking for a review of var. No point badgering on about laws to me. I know the laws of the game and I know the laws of var have changed over time. So I'm saying they can do it again
Regarding the offside ruling, Kasper Hjulmand is completely wrong!!! The technology is now so precise that it is 100% certain that the Dane was offside when the ball was played and the goal was rightly disallowed. There is a censor in the ball that detects every movement of the ball and 12 cameras in the stadium that track the position of the ball and the players 50 times per second. On the other hand, there is broad agreement that the "hand" rule must be changed.
Denmark were robbed but that’s nothing new
Oh please stop with the “robbed” bs they didn’t play well enough to win and so they lost as a result it’s as simple as that
Typical England Referee was rigged , i dont like him
As if a Brit wanted Germany to win.
Worst Denamrk record in recent years. Awful manager and needs to replaced ASAP.