Johannes Vermeer - Girl with a Pearl Earring (1665)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 фев 2017
- Who's that girl? Over centuries Dutch painter Johannes Vermeer has made many people wonder about the identity of this girl. In this video you'll learn all about it!
By watching this video you'll learn the major facts about 'Girl with a Pearl Earring' by Dutch baroque artist Johannes Vermeer. The painting will be visually analyzed (composition, ordonnance, color, technique, style, etc.) and the common interpretations are explained.
Love both art history and this painting , Vermeer and all his works.
Excellent commentary. I just watched the movie with the same name. Even though it was fiction and not based on historical fact, the movie was a masterpiece in its own right and I think it will generate renewed interest in this beautiful painting and the artist Vermeer. He was a true master of light.
Look at her eyes and the soft light and the shadows. Vermeer was always very good at painting light, capturing the moment like a photograph. This picture looks like it was shot by a camera because this emotion she's displaying looks like it can't be faked, n she has to have had to stand like that for months it's just so beautiful. I want to know her, her story. Her eyes are telling a story, her lips are saying another. The turban, the coarse dress n the pearl earring tell a different story each ugh I love it so much
Hafsa Hameed Ali Vermeer did NOT use a camera. He is such a great artist that he can paint something with his brush and create perspective with a pinhole and a string and make you believe he used a camera. That is one of the reasons why he is such a great artist. but most of al it is his compositions, colour, light and mystery he gave his paintings that makes him one of the greatest painters of all time.
Me too! like you, I love it so much it hurts.
At least you spelled the artist name right...thank you...♥️
she's like looking at my soul thanks :)
This was a very informative review. Thanks for posting this. Hoping for more videos in the future
She's incredibly beautiful. No surprise he wanted to use her as a model.
I think she is very likely his tweenage daughter, playing dress-up.
@@JiveDadson yup it very likely is her, I like to believe he imagined her on her special day
Great Channel I love it keep the videos coming so we can learn in just a few minutes
I am not an art "afficinato" nor do i prenteind to be. for that matter i think the "study of art" is mislead...however, this painting speaks to me, and thats all i care to know.
Thank you.
Un pintor de pintores.
She is so beautiful . Love at first site .
Thank you all
I thought the narrating was very beautiful. Thank you 🙏
a fair analysis
It's not a painting, he use a lens like camera obscura, anyone can do it with enough time
You really thought this through
Didn't you .........
New Yoko First of all, Vermeer's paintings are so magical because of his composition, subject matter, colour, use of light and his brilliant painting tecnique. All these things combined make him a master and none of these things have anything to do with how he painted. Vermeer made these wonderfull images for us to admire 300 years later still and that is a fact.
Second, there is literally ZERO evidence for that ridiculous camera obscura theory. There is only a lot of avidence proving he painted like any other painter in the 17th century did. Like the pin hole in his paintings from where he pinned a thread to create the vanishing point for perspective. Vermeer never owned a camera obscura. When he died and all his possessions were put up for auction there wasn't one found in his studio. No one who ever visited him while he was painting ever made any mention of him using any kind of device. Also it is not possible to use a camera obscura indoors in a small room like Vermeer's studio. A camera obscura needs much more light to be effective.
Anyone who can paint as well as Vermeer has no use for a camera obscura. Painting is drawing.
Narrating is awesomely terrible