Drone Tracking Radar: Part 5 CFAR Targeting

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024

Комментарии • 37

  • @rhb03
    @rhb03 5 месяцев назад +1

    Jon this is such a great series! I’ve got a Phaser and this is the perfect way to get familiar with the hardware. I am very much looking forward to the final video. I suspect you are super busy getting ready for the May Hands On Phased Array Workshop. I wish I could attend but cannot.

  • @PIYUSH_PRABHAT
    @PIYUSH_PRABHAT 3 месяца назад +3

    Where is the part:6 of this series.
    (Multi Chirp range Doppler)

    • @JohnThygerson-pc4xy
      @JohnThygerson-pc4xy 3 месяца назад

      ruclips.net/video/xnaaD9Um3K8/видео.htmlsi=gjiNoWx1SqAWuG-9

  • @ramishawwa5661
    @ramishawwa5661 4 месяца назад

    Any chance you can try doing a series using Plasma Antenna? I know It's difficult to get info about them, that's why we should push on civilian side the knowledge regards these superior antennas. I would love to start seeing open projects that use them

  • @EEEEMMMMKKKK
    @EEEEMMMMKKKK 3 месяца назад

    Hi. May i ask you what will be the expected range of this project when it comes to size of a consumer drone?

  • @keyboard_toucher
    @keyboard_toucher 4 месяца назад

    4:52 Looks like the false alarms that remain after CFAR tend to be ephemeral and could be filtered out by some kind of temporal averaging.

  • @rhb03
    @rhb03 4 месяца назад

    Hey Jon, I’ve noticed your python GitHub examples (which are super instructive BTW) run quite a bit slower on my stock phaser board than what appears in your videos. Have you perhaps overclocked your pi 4 a bit? I am running the latest downloaded ADI phaser image and updated software.

    • @jonkraft
      @jonkraft  4 месяца назад +1

      No I'm not running the programs on the Rpi. I prefer to run, and edit them, on my desktop computer. So just connect Pluto (via USB) to your desktop computer, and ethernet from computer to Rpi). It will run much better, especially for processing intensive things like CFAR. Also, for technical support on Phaser/Pluto (and much faster replies!), please use this forum: ez.analog.com/adieducation/university-program/

  • @republikas
    @republikas 6 месяцев назад +2

    hi, is it possible to use already developed radar sensors from car industry like "adaptive cruise control radar" for drone tracking or other purposes , with developing code for it.

    • @Enderbro3300
      @Enderbro3300 5 месяцев назад

      Are those actually radar? Or are they lidar? I know that a lot of marketing uses lidar, radar, and ultrasonic interchangeably

    • @republikas
      @republikas 5 месяцев назад

      @@Enderbro3300 i was reading technical documentation from OEM parts manufacturer BOSCH it is radar working in 77GHz but they don't specify what type is it FMCW or CW.
      YT channel @Thesignalpath was doing dissection of this radars.

    • @ligius3
      @ligius3 3 месяца назад

      They are indeed FMCW and can discriminate between stationary and moving objects as well as figure out speed differences for emergency braking. It obviously also needs the steering wheel angle.

    • @dachronic6709
      @dachronic6709 3 месяца назад

      Temic (continental) makes 77ghz radars (not lidar), quite a lot of cars have them. I think from 2009.

    • @ligius3
      @ligius3 3 месяца назад

      Possibly. Most cars that have AEB or adaptive cruise control use this kind of radar. The first generations just provided a distance to target and target relative speed, I think. The newer ones provide a list of targets, angular position, relative speeds. Pretty sure none of them can detect a small drone and cannot be easily used outside of a car. Bosch has a list of products 'off the highway' or something similar but everything is 'request a quote'.

  • @IndependentNewsMedia
    @IndependentNewsMedia 6 месяцев назад

    Nice video, are their default settings for different target sizes, which I could change depending on the target of choice, and then fine tune due to the clutter?

    • @livy-kk7ob
      @livy-kk7ob 6 месяцев назад +2

      It looks like you need to set up a test environment yourself to debug these parameters.

    • @IndependentNewsMedia
      @IndependentNewsMedia 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@livy-kk7ob I am finding this series of videos quite exciting, I am looking forward to my own setup later in the year. God bless.

    • @jonkraft
      @jonkraft  6 месяцев назад +1

      Yes, I think @livy-kk7ob is right. It seems like people sort this out on the radar range. Though I'm sure they have much better methods than my slider bars! Maybe some others that have experience with this can give more background on how it is done in the real world?

  • @antikoerper256
    @antikoerper256 4 месяца назад +3

    Amazing stuff, this is what the Internet was made for! Incredibly interesting and valuable, thanks for sharing your learning process with us

  • @jamiekawabata7101
    @jamiekawabata7101 4 месяца назад +3

    I just watched all five videos in the series. Cool stuff!
    This guy is super smart and must have gone to an awesome college.

  • @samdirichlet7500
    @samdirichlet7500 6 месяцев назад +3

    Hi This is great stuff. I'm really enjoying it.
    One suggestion: You can do that loop much faster with something like:
    half_width = num_guard_cells + num_ref_cells
    kernel = np.zeros(1+2*half_width)
    kernel[:num_ref_cells] = 1
    kernel[-num_ref_cells:] = 1
    kernel /= 2*number_ref_cells
    cfar_values = np.convolve(X_k, kernel, 'valid')
    edges = np.ones(half_width)*cfar_values.min()
    cfar_values = np.hstack((edges, cfar_values, edges))
    # Pull out targets only as before
    I didn't test the code but I think it is OK. I might have the indexing a little off and I didn't use the masked array.
    Just a suggestion. Again, good stuff.

  • @Barc0d3
    @Barc0d3 5 месяцев назад +2

    Such a gem you are!

  • @AerialWaviator
    @AerialWaviator 6 месяцев назад +2

    Great thorough, but easy to understand coverage of these topics.
    One thing that might have been interesting to see in a demo is results of multiple targets are visible to the radar beam. Realize keeping the experimentation/demonstration setup has advantages. Thinking of use case of detecting bicycles, or cars.

  • @Rachelebanham
    @Rachelebanham 6 месяцев назад +2

    nice

  • @johnd0e25
    @johnd0e25 6 месяцев назад +1

    Really enjoying this series, I'm looking forward to the next video!

  • @BigIron_06
    @BigIron_06 6 месяцев назад +1

    So, basically you are adjusting the squelch???

    • @Parkhill57
      @Parkhill57 6 месяцев назад +4

      Yes, but the squelch adapts to the data. In real radars there is also filter and range-gate blanking for signal mixing birdies and reflection anomalies.

  • @milovanriel1
    @milovanriel1 5 месяцев назад

    do you also perform concultancy work on radar?

  • @LeeDuLite
    @LeeDuLite 5 месяцев назад

    any information about max range?

    • @LeeDuLite
      @LeeDuLite 5 месяцев назад

      and also price

  • @briannewbold3530
    @briannewbold3530 4 месяца назад

    Jon or anyone else.. is there a kit we can buy?

    • @jonkraft
      @jonkraft  4 месяца назад

      The Phasers are hard to keep in stock, but post your question at the link below, and ADI will try to help you find one: ez.analog.com/adieducation/university-program/