The Kaiser Darrin was released for orders and publicly shown two months before the Corvette, LA Motorama, 1952. Kaiser deliveries were delayed so Corvettes were in the hands of owners sooner.
Nothing dumb about any of these cars. Only an American human car enthusiast from that period would know that, of course. Why didn't you talk about the never for sale car shown on the cover?
I fail to see how the adjective “dumbest” applies to any of these cars. I won’t be watching any more videos on this channel. There are much better options.
Everybody knows the Edsel story. A few car nuts like me know the Healy story. But if the Skyliner was the disaster the presenter claims why did Ford continue to market it for the next 2 model years? And why is the car featured as the header not included in the vid?
The Skyliner had a tub in the trunk to put luggage in so it wouldn't interfere with the top which would cover the bin. The trunk was longer and taller (the fuel tank was in the front of trunk - see the filler door at 4:20 - instead of under it) than a regular convertible so while there was less trunk room it isn't small. You can see the bin (covered) at 4:40. The technology was adapted for the 1958-1966 Thunderbird and Lincoln soft top convertibles. None of these are "dumbest and worst" and none of them will surprise anyone even 1% of the time, other than being wrong.
I assure you, your content is FAR from amazing. The three vehicles discussed in the video are, in no way, the worst cars of the 1950s. Since you have nothing of value to contribute to the auto hobby please discontinue putting up videos.
I Love the 1957 Ford Skyliner. It was a great idea at the time. The car looks great too. It was a one off. What is dumb about that? I like Edsels too. Try to buy one today? They are really expensive. the only good thing about your video are the video clips.
A confusing AI generated fake British/Australian accent does not indicate any expertise when reading/recording these narrow minded narrow focused opinions. The cars mentioned were mostly testbeds and cars to promote the manufacturers other vehicles. Most, 2 out of 3 were intended as limited production. How do you measure success? Certainly collectors clubs would welcome all three cars. The Bricklin was also considered unsuccessful yet most of these cars are still running today. Summer 2024 St. John New Brunswick Canada welcomed a reunion of these lasting and beloved cars that still look modern after fifty years. How dare you say dumb, how dare you say worst?? What makes you such an expert? Credibility please!
Really? Do you think these were dumb failures? What about push-button gear selectors placed where children can reach them? How about not spending the $$ to design a V-8 or borrow someone else's and instead propel all your new products with a flathead 6?
What does an AI bot with a phony Brit accent know about 1950s American cars ?...
AHA!
As a genuine Brit I object to the description of the AI voiceover as phoney Brit. It is definitely phoney posh Anzac. 😊
@@johnruggles7739 As a genuine American I appreciate your input.
Sounds Aussie to me being one. Definitely not AI bot.
keep your day job
"Dumbest" & "falls short of expectations" sums up this video rather than its content.
You're nuts and seem to looking at these from a strictly commercial point of view.
Exactly!
Your cover image belongs to me, Casey/artandcolour and you do not have permission to use it. Please change it or remove the video. Reported.
0:58: Sorry, Corvette was the first American car with a fiberglass body (1953).
The Kaiser Darrin was released for orders and publicly shown two months before the Corvette, LA Motorama, 1952. Kaiser deliveries were delayed so Corvettes were in the hands of owners sooner.
Nothing dumb about any of these cars. Only an American human car enthusiast from that period would know that, of course. Why didn't you talk about the never for sale car shown on the cover?
I fail to see how the adjective “dumbest” applies to any of these cars. I won’t be watching any more videos on this channel. There are much better options.
Just cause they're old doesn't make them classic.
Repeat yourself, why don't you
I can see why you only have 483 subscribers. Lucky you have that many.
Everybody knows the Edsel story. A few car nuts like me know the Healy story. But if the Skyliner was the disaster the presenter claims why did Ford continue to market it for the next 2 model years? And why is the car featured as the header not included in the vid?
The Skyliner had a tub in the trunk to put luggage in so it wouldn't interfere with the top which would cover the bin. The trunk was longer and taller (the fuel tank was in the front of trunk - see the filler door at 4:20 - instead of under it) than a regular convertible so while there was less trunk room it isn't small. You can see the bin (covered) at 4:40. The technology was adapted for the 1958-1966 Thunderbird and Lincoln soft top convertibles. None of these are "dumbest and worst" and none of them will surprise anyone even 1% of the time, other than being wrong.
The skyliner was a great looking car, I remember riding the red and white, which was a beauty.
I assure you, your content is FAR from amazing. The three vehicles discussed in the video are, in no way, the worst cars of the 1950s.
Since you have nothing of value to contribute to the auto hobby please discontinue putting up videos.
I Love the 1957 Ford Skyliner. It was a great idea at the time. The car looks great too. It was a one off. What is dumb about that? I like Edsels too. Try to buy one today? They are really expensive. the only good thing about your video are the video clips.
I WOULD TAKE ANY OF THESE CARS THAN ANYTHING MADE TODAY
Kaiser Darrin was TOO distinctive. Initial impression when seeing the front was shock, shortly followed by a laugh and head scratch!
If you're going to talk about cars from the 50s why are you showing a 61 Plymouth....?
990 hp, 161 ci ??? That’s enough for me, you haven’t the faintest idea !
90 horsepower, did you hear?
@@anthonypopola5773 I’m deaf, read the captions.
@@anthonypopola5773 In 57-58, I saw one in a filling station, it was powered by a 235 Continental.
90 hp..
A confusing AI generated fake British/Australian accent does not indicate any expertise when reading/recording these narrow minded narrow focused opinions. The cars mentioned were mostly testbeds and cars to promote the manufacturers other vehicles. Most, 2 out of 3 were intended as limited production. How do you measure success? Certainly collectors clubs would welcome all three cars. The Bricklin was also considered unsuccessful yet most of these cars are still running today. Summer 2024 St. John New Brunswick Canada welcomed a reunion of these lasting and beloved cars that still look modern after fifty years. How dare you say dumb, how dare you say worst?? What makes you such an expert? Credibility please!
Not only weird uglies , but the excess of public space these cars occupied due to their absurd sizes
Really? Do you think these were dumb failures? What about push-button gear selectors placed where children can reach them? How about not spending the $$ to design a V-8 or borrow someone else's and instead propel all your new products with a flathead 6?
I would have any of the cars
Me,too. I would love to have any of the three.
I THINK YOU ARE CRAZY
I believe you have put across a good post. Thanks.
You'll be glad to have a car to drive I have to ride a bike can people have supported Pontiac in Plymouth and Oldsmobile weed still have them today
Fake AI narration