World's 1st Glossy OLED Monitor with Anti-VRR Flicker & 3-Year Burn-in Warranty! (ASUS XG27AQDMG)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 янв 2025
- We visit ASUS's booth at Computex 2024, & take a first look at the new ROG Strix XG27AQDMG OLED gaming monitor with a glossy 27-inch WOLED panel, 1440p resolution & 240Hz refresh rate.
Other technologies demonstrated by ASUS at Computex 2024 include its AI Assistant technology, as well as a new ProArt PA27JCV 5K monitor.
To learn more about these new monitors, please visit:
ASUS XG27AQDMG: rog.gg/HDTV_XG...
ASUS PA27JCV: asus.click/HDT...
Where to buy the XG27AQDMG:
US: rog.gg/MC_XG27...
UK: rog.gg/OC_XG27...
The "Includes Paid Promotion' message in this video refers to the sponsorship by ASUS.
========================
**Click Below to SUBSCRIBE for More Reviews, Sneak Peeks & Tips:
/ @hdtvtest
========================
VISIT HDTV Test
www.hdtvtest.co...
FOLLOW US!
www.threads.ne...
/ hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ vincent_teoh
/ hdtvtest
3 year burn in warranty sure but with the way ASUS has been handling RMA's I wouldn't feel safe about that warranty.
U most probably get a refurbished one
If there is any mark of usage… your warrant is not valid!
😂
0 yr irl warranty
Warranty will be voided since you would be taking it out of the packaging.
Only an issue in the US/Canada luckily, imagine not living in the EU ;)
This monitor is NOT glossy. It's using a low roughness anti glare instead of an anti reflection coating like LG's tv's do. In fact you can take a look yourself in this very video at the 1:26 mark. You can clearly see the GRAIN around the bright white light and the reflection itself is blurry, there would be no such thing on a true glossy monitor. No grain and the reflection would be razer sharp. Anti reflection coatings are much more expensive than anti glare so Asus decided to cheap out here by looking for a foil with the least amount of roughness and then falsely advertise this as glossy because apparently it's reflective enough to be called that from the marketings point of view. If you buy this with the hope of finally getting a glossy monitor I'm sorry to disappoint but it's more semi gloss than actually glossy.
Good catch
VERY good point.
Still a step up from that Dough retrofit nonsense I guess.
Looks like qd -oled is still the only option assuming you can set your room the right way to prevent the raised tinting.
I don't get why anyone would actually want a literal reflection..
@@Octamed So I can enjoy how handsome I am while looking at the much superior image quality of a glossy screen
@@eduonkhlObviously!
Sadly Displays Unboxed showed that the anti VRR flicker doesn't actually fix the problem as it just reduces the effectiveness of VRR. Kinda defeats the point. Still, love the idea of a true glossy monitor. Just a shame the first one is 1440p and not 4K.
Been using a C2 42" as a monitor for almost 2 years now, I only ecountered vrr flicker in menus and loading screens, never in actual gameplay. Granted, maybe there are games which do suffer from it, but I haven't found one yet. I think capping the framerate and maybe lowering settings a bit or using dlss/fsr to ensure framerate is as stable as possible and doesn't dip too much in the most demanding scenes minimizes the chance of it happening.
@@baalrog666it's definitely noticeable in game too if you have erratic frametimes, like shader compilation stutter. Frame rate capping helps though
1440p is perfect for gaming! 4k would have trouble running max refresh rate. And this is like the cheapest brand new OLED screen. I'm waiting for it impatiently
@@AshLordCurryliterally no problem hitting 240hz 4k with today's video cards.
@AshLordCurry that's just misinformation. Even a 3060 could easily handle 4K in any game. I used to play at 4K on a GTX 1080. Anything over 60fps is well in the playable area and nearly anything can handle 4K at medium settings. You don't have to use ultra everything.
And there will be older games that will max it out. 240fps is pretty unrealistic in any game with most being CPU bottlenecked just over 120fps or in some cases even just 90fps. Unless you're playing esports on low settings you just shouldn't expect that high a frame rate and even then in those games 4K may still be fairly close.
In CSGO the drop from 1440p to 4K is only from 320fps to 290fps at Ultra on both using a 3090 for reference of CPU bottlenecking. For more realistic GPUs an RX 6800 gets 240fps at both, the 3060 ti gets 290 vs 200, and 5700XT gets 220 vs 180. As you can see, in the games that benefit from frame rate you still get absurdly high in them. Just don't expect it to be the same with path tracing in the newest COD. My one friend asked me to troubleshoot his system with a 4090 and it turned out that setting just forced itself on. Doesn't even work with the highest hardware so don't freak out about not being able to run the highest settings.
I'm a glossy fan. 😂 the in depth technical detail and comedic timing is why love this channel. Cheers Vincent
glossy and grainy if i saw correctly
@@touristhawk once I acquire this monitor. I can test that for you
glossy is so trash, I hate when reflection falls on screen when I try to do smth 🤢
I'm gladd OLED VRR flicker is an issue that the OEMs are aware of, but just reducing the VRR range isn't really a suitable solution. I wouldn't even consider it a workaround.
its a joke imo
You can already do this with a software to manually set the VRR range, I believe it is CRU.
@@thehorsefromhorsinabout cru custom vrr range doesnt work on my msi 4k oled 240hz monitor. CRU is not the alternative people should look into, hardware based solution is better. I'm pretty sure the people that are crying about lower vrr range just doesnt understand that LFC is the better solution even on my older ips display. Moving your mouse cursor in a 60fps game feels awful when the refresh rate is at 60 but feels snappier at 120Hz mode due to LFC.
Got one. IT works fine
That very similar to what people did with CRU, didn't really worked with that and it does not work when monitor software does the same.
Disabling VRR partly is not fixing the problem. The fix needs to be at the source, so the gamma shift at different frame rates needs to be equalized. So far we‘ve only seen improvements with the G1 and now the G4 where LG decided to increase the dithering strength
1:48 So basically they "solved" VRR flicker by turning off VRR. We could already do that.
They made it so you can reduce it not totally turn it off. It's a good compromise imo
@@AshLordCurryit's not.
Awaiting a Vincent reply.
@@AshLordCurry It's not.
@@AshLordCurry CRU (custom resolution utility) and the like have supported this for a while now. (modifying the VRR range as required)
I bought this monitor a few days ago. I love it so far
congrats, I'm thinking to get it too, do you feel you are missing out on 4K ?
also, given its has a 2.0 HDMI howe do you achieve 241 Hz ?
thanks
@@tamerthebian7286 no because i'm already used to playing at 1440p and I do have a 4K 120htz TV to play single player games. I achieved 240htz using display port since I only use the monitor for my pc
@@tamerthebian7286hdmi 2.0 cannot achieve 240 hz. For console I believe the max possible is 4k upscaled at 60hz
@@DC_1398 Just put a hdmi to displayport cable and solved, this happens in almost every screen
@1:06 🤨I'm confused. 😕So what is he saying, that the DOUGH W-OLED is still using a Matte Panel with the Gorilla Glass attached to the front? 🤔
I think so ,but I don't understand the implication? Does the Dough W-OLED look worse because they do this or is there no difference in person?
@@Reac2 I would expect it to look worse and there's definitely no reason it could look better than a normal matte panel in any way.
Did i hear correctly? HDMI 2.0?! That's a deal breaker right there.
Agreed, capping all HDMI sources at 144hz is a weird move.
Is that Jake behind him around 30 sec mark
Jake from State Farm?
sure looks like him
@@yonkocommander5531 jake from LTT
He's there at the end of the video for a good while too. edit: Actually, he's there most of the video
I think it is. Around the 1:11 mark you can see an LTT logo
They said it's the same panel as the AQDM hence why it's cheaper to, being last gen
Selling old tech while marketing it as new. Asus and Apple have something in common!
Aww, man... What a disappointment.
Please do a follow up on this monitor once it's available and check for brightness / color uniformity as well as for text readability. The PG27AQDM was horrible in both categories. I bought one and had two new (factory sealed) replacements and all had up to 40% of brightness uniformity error.
Now launch a native glossy 32" MLA 4K 120 version.
Well, it certainly wouldn't be
@@concinnus240 or riot. Even then i want bfi
120Hz? Okay, pleb.
Jake from linus tech tips making a cameo
Showing up in the background while being entirely unaffiliated is not what a cameo is.
linus son 🤣
1:11 LTT logo. I was watching this...and the whole time, I'm like....is that Jake?
Good thing I don't watch any of those Linux clowns.
who still watches linus in 2024.....yikez
this is interesting, but 27"?
where's 32"?
You'll get it don't worry, the market for 32" high-end monitors has been huge for a while - they will make it, people want it.
Meanwhile, the minority of us who want 4K on 24" size have no options, none, and probably never will.
We don't need high refresh rate 32in we need 24in for fps
@@RedBeardedRabbit Get a larger monitor. 24 inches is too small for 2160p aka 4k.
Don't care it's NOT 48 inches. I upgrade my monitor and don't downgrade.
@@michaelcarson8375 Respectfully, I already have. It may be too small for you but not for my eyes. I have used all sizes 21.5 to 32 inch and various resolutions; the one I preferred most was 4K+ on 21.5” and am currently using 4K 24” because the smaller sizes are no longer available. But there are no 24” 4K high refresh available.
Offering a glossy option is a step in the right direction from LG Display. I'm just confused why it is introduced with an old RWBG panel; they might be trying to get rid of old stock by pairing it with a new property, but if/when the sales are bad they might draw the wrong conclusions from it.
WOLED's advantages lie in its better ambient black depth, higher real-world brightness (i.e. at 5-25% white, on the 1st-gen 1440p ASUS) and a longer/better track record in avoiding burn-in. These are all core OLED selling points. LG Display _needs_ to push these advantages.
Its WOLED bro :/
This is and will be my monitor for the foreseeable future until there’s a bigger jump in technology with monitors. And the anti flicker does work but only in SDR mode. Since jumping to OLEDs I game in hdr almost exclusively. All around a great choice and something more people can actually drive the max refresh rate in unlike some of the e higher refresh rate options out there. I have a 4070ti Super and unless I set very low settings or use DLSS I don’t get much past 180fps in the competitive games I play.
I'm spending $700 on this over the PS5 Pro thanks for helping my decision, just kinda hesitant about no HDMI 2.1 (which should be standard) with this kind of screen and nits brightness. I want a real upgrade with my first OLED purchase
Wait till black Friday bruh
@@RX7821979 Hmm..since it's new to the market, do you really it will be on sale aswell?
@@RX7821979held out and got this monitor for $549 on early Black Friday deals bc of ur comment 🥳
I hope this marks a step for more glossy OLED monitors upcoming. Been waiting for that myself for quite some time. 4k 240hz 32" Glossy Oled with good quality/functions etc and I'm set.
Not to sure about Asus burn in warranty given how they handle warranties. (And I guess burn-in has to go through Asus and not a retailer)
I lock my 120hz oled to 90fps in NVCP because I would rather have a constant 90 than have it bounce around between 100-120. No flicker because vrr isn’t activated hitting max fps. Steady fps with no drops is the way to go even if you have to cap it.
Isn't there 32" inch for the same model?
It doesn't look glossy at all. It looks semi-glossy, like all the mid to low end TVs you see at the electric store. Look at the top TV models, all premium glossy, clear coating. That's what we want, not a dirty glossy coating.
Why do you want it to be reflective though? It's very weird to me.
@@Octamed Because it's the best image quality. That's why high end TV:s are glossy.
@@tukkeuma8958 best for watching content in the dark. Not for working in a bright room.
@@OctamedBecause no matter how good your matte finish is at handling direct reflections, there will always be visible grain and colors will be a bit worse. Also hdr doesn't really work in a bright room with reflections anyways, so for a good hdr experience you have to use a dark room with no direct reflections anyways.
My Alienware 55 inch oled had a glossy surface on it. This thing looks like a screen thats been left in the attic a while.
Would have loved this like 5 years ago, but hey it's better to have than never these days. I'm still happy with my Alienware DWF for now, but great to see an actual company instead of Spectrum/Dough actually make what I've wanted for years and years of an actual Glossy gaming monitor, AND OLED.
Glossy good but 27 4k please
Hope they use the same panels in a ultrawide model.
Really like the look of it but with HDMI 2.0 does that mean it won't support VRR for PS5? My understanding is some 1440p/HDMI 2.0 products support console VRR and some don't. Will have to see.
Loved using 3 LG glossy monitors back in the early 2010's for nvidia surround.
Glossy is where its at but to many complain about reflection. Well, turn down the lights and drape your windows. LoL
Still waiting for a 27 inch 4K OLED Monitor
Same, and it better be glossy.
Seen any oled at at least 5120 by 2160 resolution and 45” +?
Hoping Vincent reviews the Bravia 7 and the TCL C855.
Can someone tell me how this one is cheaper than their previous model PG27AQDM? Wouldn’t the previous ones price go down? It’s still more expensive than this new one
Does anyone recognise the racing game running on the Monitor at 2:50? Can anyone tell me what it is? It looks really good!
Finally a proper glossy oled monitor, but it looks like I'll have to wait a few more years before upgrading from my 2 yr old 42C2, current offerings are pretty disappointing for their price
its 550$ now on amazon
5K oleds please, I want to run 1440p at an even 2x scaling.
will there be a 32" version of this?
ASUS PG32UCDM
Is there a 4K version of this monitor?
now they just need 4k and a design which doesn’t suck
How much hertz the DSC will limit refresh rate to?
I don't understand why they're still using HDMI 2.0 ports.
Love to finally see at least some attention being paid to attempts at glossy displays. But I guess the wait continues for a true, glossy 27-32” _4K_ OLED monitor.
6:34 A delta error below 1, not 2.
What causes the vrr flicker in oled? My 1st gen qd oled has hardware gsync but still has flicker
I already turn VRR off to get rid of the flicker. Automating that isn’t exactly a win. 😢
Why no hdmi 2.1?
Still only 1440p though so it doesn't interest me personally, as I care most about PPI. I think 30" 4K 240Hz+ with Dolby Vision and G-Sync-compatible is probably perfect. Still not sure on QD-OLED, W-OLED, or wait for MicroLED/NanoLED, as I've been burned in the past by my LG C6 TV which has terrible burn-in since about the 2-year mark.
1:11 LTT Jake confirmed! I wonder when the short-circuit will come out..
When will we see 4k on 27" with Oled?
Sucks that it's not 32 inch 4K.
I'd take 27 inch 4K, the real problem is that this is the stupid stop-gap resolution of 1440p. Idiotic "sweetspot" nonsense..
@@JayJayYUP 8K 40 inch is where it’s at. 220 PPI with perfect 200% scaling. 1440p is sadly all cards can handle at max settings, even after all these years. 4K60 maxed out with DLAA still isn’t possible with new games - it’s insane.
ASUS PG32UCDM
@@arikelvara that’s QD OLED, not WOLED.
@@WestAard The video is technically about OLED and not specifically just WOLED. Plus, QD OLED are typically superior and the PG32UCDM is arguably the best display on the market, especially of OLED, at the moment so arikelvara's recommendation is actually very good.
Will they launch also a 32" 4K model?
Why automatically turn on image presets, my monitor has them and I don’t like them, but here they will force me to turn them on?
Good. We need more monitors with a glossy option.
Seriously. So annoyed when monitors come out that are glossy but comes with other compromises. Can’t win.
If I don't play a competitive shooter MP game. I would be fine just doing 120Hz Vsync to be honest even if VRR exist. As long as the game is stable at that level. Because input lag with "Reflex on" and at 120Hz, is actually not that huge for a single player. But there is no VRR flicker etc.
But the real use for VRR is that you do not have to fit a game into a set range. And anything that defeats that purpose, defeats VRR.
I love my Asus ROG 4k QD-OLED pg32ucdm. More vivid colors. I don't game in a bright room so no issue for me.
What I really like is the rather simple stand
When will this be purchaseable in Europe? I know it launched in the US already but not in Europe.
im watching this video on that exact monitor right now. it's pretty good.
With 5000 series 4k should be standard even on 27 inch monitors. Idk why LG recently released a 45 inch OLED monitor at 1440p
Where is your Samsung s95D review?
Which shooters were shown on the display?
Ticking almost all boxes, we're are almost there boyz!
Actually looks like a decent product from Asus, though I never had a problem with VRR flicker save once, in Lies of P when I had my Series X set to 120hrz. All I had to do was change the output to 60 and it was resolved. If I was still PC gaming though this would be interesting.
Is this the same panel in the LG 27GS95QE?
@fahd5829: No.
I would instantly buy this particular model but it’s not available in my country 😢
A nice monitor to be sure but unfortunately the Anti flicker adds stuttering.. 🤦♂️ I would take flickering over stuttering any day.
My LG Oled TV is glossy.. i just didn't remove the plastic from the front when I bought it!
Me watching video on my 15y.o. TN screan: wooow look how colorful this monitor is!
If this were a 32" 4k oled from anyone other than Asus, I'd be interested
Im glad i waited for a glossy oled 😇
Glossy versus Matte, which do you prefer?
depends on the environs, purely for colour and image, gotta be Glossy. But if you work a lot, with sun involved or things in your background, you want matte.
If you’re asking him, he says he prefers glossy in the video. I really hate matte OLEDs because they defeat the entire purpose of the technology to me which is the incredible contrast and depth. If there is enough light in a room to annoy you on a glossy OLED, it is also enough light to make a matte OLED look like shit. They just scatter the light across the screen, dulling the picture and turning blacks to grey. At that point you might as well just get an alternative type of panel that can get much brighter to combat light issues.
Matte
depends on the room. I have a dark game cave so glossy.
Never saw a glossy, but would probably prefer it, as I always sit in a dark room.
What game is running in the background at 1:58?
maybe systemshock 2 remake but not sure
System Shock Remake
Finally back to a Square stand. The spider 3 leg stand was really bad!
is that jack from ltt in the back. ? :D
What game is that MOBA that they are running ?
I just got this monitor 2 days ago, I sold my PG27AQDM 240hz oled for $550.00 and got this one. Im really happy with it. The glossy coating makes a huuuge difference!!
This ticks the boxes for me. I'll have to check it out.
VRR anti-flicker interests me, especially with OLED.
B9?
As we all know by now, ASUS warranty is meaningless..
If you actually watched the full video he shows that they did in fact get their item fixed, they just tried to scam him by fixing unrelated things. So as long as you aren't dumb you can have them fix your item.
@@8K240hz nice, shifting blame to customers for asus scummy practices..
@@8K240hz It doesn't make it any better, I will not support companies that use such shameful methods to extort money from their customers.
@@fug33 im not excusing their scamming, i'm just saying as a human being that knows how to use their brain properly you can get what you need from them.
@@8K240hz not in my experience, they ghosted me after my monitor died. i'm done with asus
0:36 this is mouthful
huh, seems like prices are coming way down if the prices noted here are true.
Promising hopefully a 32 inch 4K
next year
There has been review already: its barely 10% brighter in full screen brightness than typical other oleds monitor and it has old pixel layout so text won't look good.
Is this coming out on 42” or will LG C4 be the only option?
The G4 is better than the C4 FYI.
@@michaelcarson8375 G4 doesn't come in 42"
@@Barb4sale Just get the 55". You can move it back until you adjust to it. When I first got my 30" Dell 3008wfp I thought THAT was too big, it's been well over 10 years since then. It only did 2560x1600 then I moved to 3840 x 2160 on a 42" and now a 48" with vrr, I have a 55" TV though. I jumped up to 55" OLED from an OLD 40" LCD. After a while you just get used to it and when you try to go back after a year... You will not be able to do it. The screen is something you interact with EVERYDAY. The more you can actually see really changed everything.
@@michaelcarson8375 Would have been quite strange if it wasn't.
@@juanblanco7898 Which part are you plying to?
Was the prankster linus?
I had no idea people actually preferred glossy over matte. I've never been a fan of glossy finishes
Why can’t they release woled glossy in 4k 32 240?!?! Ughhh
because basically nobody would upgrade for another 10+ years.... these companies aren't stupid lol.
@@yegoat05 Its already an option just for QD OLED
Isn’t the pg32ucdm glossy?
When are you going to review the sony bravia line up
Not sure if he'd really give a truly honest review though. He's more honest than most, but he still has a heavy OLED bias. Then again, I'm not so sure there's any truly honest reviewer out there who doesn't fully discredit LED because there's some blooming (and even then the 85 inch Bravia 9 doesn't seem to have any noticable blooming you can see in-person unless the content is basically worst-case-scenario for LED while it being the best-case-scenario for OLED. There's quite a few PC users in recent years who have gotten burned with their OLED purchase. Everyone's telling them burn in isn't an issue anymore and then they themselves jump on the bandwagon. Until 2-3 years later when they have some pretty heavy burn-in themselves while the ones who recommended it to them switch to the newest displays constantly.
@thenonexistinghero I hear you I was I wanted to see a review cause of right now I have a C3 but the bravia 9 got.my attention plus it would nice with the ps5 so I don't know if it worth making the swicth
@@thesuspect1234 I think it really depends on what you want. If you want the best response time and HDR without anything weird going on, it's probably best to stick with the C3. If you want more brightness, practically no risk of burn in and don't mind a slight delay in HDR for gaming (since the local dimming/backlight isn't as responsive or precise as an OLED pixel), then the Bravia 9 is probably a good option.
Personally I think the image quality of it is probably going to be unmatched for any TV's releasing this year. OLED has some advantages, but Sony always has the most accurate colour. The response time on the Bravia 9 is still great (heck I have no issue with my current 5 year old LED). Movies and the like are more predictable than games, so in games the HDR experience would probably be a tiny bit worse than on a top-end OLED (that said, I also have no issue with it on my current TV).
If burn in wasn't an issue, I'd go for an OLED... but for me it is and I've been burned before (well it was a Galaxy S8 phone but still) and I use my TV A LOT. I'm pretty confident in my OLED destroying TV usage habits, so that's not an option. I'll be replacing my TV in 1-2 years and I think it's fairly like that the 85 inch B9 will be it once some time passes and it goes down in price a bit.
Honestly though, I'm not a purist or anything. The benefits of OLED to me are marginal at best and I love blasting my eyes with a lot of brightness. Even at night just before going to bed I with the lights out I just leave my TV on at full brightness. Ultimately it comes down to preferences, needs and wants.
@@thenonexistinghero he rated the X95k and X95L highly despite reviewers hating on the blooming etc. He likes LCDs and is a 'peak-brightness-whore' so I wouldn't worry. Fact is, OLED has better contrast and picture quality.
@@henrywinters9496 Except OLED doesn't have better contrast and picture quality. Contrast = difference between darkest and brightest. OLED sucks at contrast, only a few recent top-end OLEDs can even hit 1500-2000 nits on a very small window. OLED has a better contrast ratio, but LED completely destroys OLED when it comes to contrast. And regardless of whether it's OLED or LED, the best picture quality goes to Sony's top-end TV's. Sony always has the best colours, balance, processing, etc. I'm not being a Sony fanboy (I don't even have or want a PS5 and I got Bose earbuds because Sony's earbuds have awful batteries that have a high chance of breaking), but fact of the matter is that Sony is the one dominant force when it comes to TV picture quality. I always see people bragging about OLED picture quality but I don't think they actually have any idea what actually constitutes picture quality.
What's the best monitor do you recommend for a high end pc games ??
I got the expensive Alienware QD oled and its great but wish i waited for 6 more months to get a woled mla panel. They’re all great tho ❤
@@JroJamoJamesWhy do you want an MLA WOLED panel? QD OLED is still a superior technology that gives you better colors and uniformity. LG is closing the gap on its premium TV by compensating for the inferior color volume of WOLED with software driven adjustments, but I don’t know if any of that stuff is implemented in their monitors.
Ultragear 48 inch oled by LG fell as low as $699.
@@JroJamoJames G4 smaller size is 55" too big to use as a monitor
you have Asus PG32UCDM, GIGABYTE AORUS FO32U2 or MSI MPG 321URX
I’ve just ordered one😊
how clear can you see your face in reflection?
how does this compare to the new iPad pro display?
Matte all the way, reflection is far worst con for a monitor. Though yeah anti flicker VRR definitely to improve upon.
We actually need 4K 360Hz 27 inch glossy OLED
4k 27 Inch? How close are you sitting to your monitor? Lick range?
16:10
@@Reac2 If a 15 inch laptop can be 4k put it on a monitor.
No HDMI 2.1 ????????
For whot??????....
@@razor2049 240hz monitors/tv? latest capture cards? less dsc? custom resolution? ect ect
And no one of this need Hdmi 2.1.....@@MattensKick
@@razor2049 No you will be cucked down to 144hz and loose out on pixel formats. Cloning is also out of the question if you want 240hz.
@@MattensKick genius. Thats Not a 4k screen🙄 on 1440p Hdmi 2.0 is wayyyyy more than enought🙄
What's the game shown here?
So why would anyone downvote any of these videos, ever?
Pixel Pitch 0.229mm .. OH YES
Great, now make it 42" and MLA