A start wild west/end of the American civil war game for rdr3 would go so hard. Imagine having civil war battles where you get to go pick a side between the union or the confederates in the encounter. Or a civil war game where you play as one of the many pro-confederate guerilla groups that had existed back then and the end of the game is when the civil war ends and the protagonist is now just an a lone outlaw drifting across the barren and dead deserts in the beginning of the wild west and the guerilla group either splits up or becomes something more like a gang. A day of the dead DLC with black and neon themes that takes place in Mexico would be a nice touch as well. Some things i wouldn't wanna see are the cleche ideas of "the origins of the van der lidne gang leading up to the blackwater massacre" or "Jack Marston's adventures after killing edgar ross and being drafted to ww1" or "Sadie Adler in south america" in my opinion all of those ideas are close ended and lack freedom. The van der linde gangs whole story ended when Jack shot Edgar and as sad as it is the community really needs to start accepting that or rdr3's gonna be mid.
Tbh I’d love to see the early days of the gang. Maybe experience Annabelle’s death and the Blackwater robbery? I think doing it from Davey’s perspective would be really cool too!
rdr1 and its prequel have a different character of which you don't know what will their fate be at the end of their respective game. think of that what you will but the blackwater massacre isn't shown for a reason, you're supposed to make out what happened there from what the other characters tell you. it has plot holes for the player to fill those gaps with their imagination on what could've happened. that kind of writing worked better than being spoonfed the answer
It would be cool if you played before the blackwater massacre and you played as Dutch and got to control the gang when you completed all the missions and get to set up your own train jobs and bank jobs
I'm betting it will be with Landon Ricketts and his story, perhaps it will be a more solitary story without a specific gang, but still with striking secondary characters in the style that the rockstar knows how to do it (maybe tell how the BM was but not from Landon's perspective, because he was there)
Imagine RDR3 being a GTA5 like game. You have characters to play through like Dutch or Micah. The beginning of their legacy like a you're reading through a journal.
@@reddeadmp4It can’t be about the gang member other than Jack he’s the only one who he chased after no one else in the gang will be chased but Jack isn’t in the gang so the story about the Van Der Linde gang is finished
Could be arthurs dad. Remember what arthur said about him(an outlaw, tough guy) . His father passed his things to Arthur(just like Arthur did with john and john did with jack) and Arthur watched him die, a perfect revenge option(if he revenged him) also considering how things happens in rdr universe Arthur to john, john to jack. İt will be possibly someone to Arthur and the best one i can think about is his dad
I feel like if it had anything to do with the rdr2 gang, the main character would most likely be Davey, his death was given a lot of hype in the beginning of rdr2
@@reddeadmp4 Maybe mac but definitely not davey. There's no sign of redemption just looking through the dialogue about him but there is some for mac. I dunno, sometimes rockstar likes to change alot of things
Doubt it's gonna be about the gang. There would be no redemption part in that. Just a game about outlaws. It would be better if they'd follow another character like one of the native Americans who was riding with Eagle Flies to the Cornwall factory in chapter 6 and managed to survive so he goes on a revenge mission for his fallen brothers but finds redemption later on, or something like that.
Possibly jack, redemption in the story terms is one paying for their sins, and a downfall, also the story is about the downfall of west, jack became the last gun slinger, why not his downfall.
Realistically story wise it would make sense to do something with Jack, but considering the world at that point there wouldn't be much to do that has the wild west theme, he'd just be a criminal, and as much as I love the boy, he'd probably die real early on in life. Another prequel would be best, I'd personally love something with young Dutch, Arthur, Hosea, and John, but to make another prequel there'd probably be even more things that wouldn't make sense in the later games (like how John just doesn't bring up Arthur and Hosea in rdr1 despite growing up with them, there'd probably be something that should be mentioned in rdr2 that isn't if they do that)
IMO, I think it should be about Jack fighting in WW1 since RDR1 story ends in 1914, the same year WW1 breaks out. He probably wouldn’t want to fight for the same government that killed his father, plus the US joined WW1 in 1917, near the end of the war. If he fought in WW1 he could’ve gone to Canada and enlisted into the Canadian army since they were in the war from the start and the story would be longer.
I think they will not make the VDL gang the main focus anymore, with it being some vigilante, bounty hunter or hell even another gang would be cool. Maybe the Van Der Lindes being friends would be lovely tho
I think jack should be the main character during rdr3 and i alredy can see the comments saying that its the end of the wild west in ww1 is happening but the reason why i still want it like that because i can imagine jack living a life of being a ruthless gunslinger with no one else in his life but throughout the game he has to accept to move on from the pass in embrace the future and ends up doing good things and sence jack dies in 1990 the game can do a time skip in kill him off in either a rival challenging him or just by age but thats just me
@@Weaponsaddict you never know that may what rockstar might want you to think and also why are you calling me little dude when you joined two weeks ago lol
i like how it remains secretive on what happens within the massacre, we don't really need the answer spoonfed to us through the next game starring callender brothers, why bother make a game which you cant even fully complete after the game ends, either davey nor mac can get a redemption, their fate was sealed
I think people forgot that in order for it to be a "Red Dead Redemption" game there has to be a "Redemption" arc in it. It can't just be a game telling a story about the gang in the early days, no what made rdr2 so great. Is that it was set in a time, where the gang was ending so that Arthur and John could try and achieve redemption for all they did. Thats why i think, rockstar could try something with Landon Ricketts. Since we only met him when he was old, and we know nothing of his past. Only that he was a gunslinger so, there is potentiel for a good game in him.
You have a valid point but from what we know already, landon has always been seen as a heroic figure. You look at arthur and john, they are heroes by definition but they still ended up dying due to their bad living. If landon had some sorta dark past and later redeemed himself, he probably would've died earlier. Most gunslingers have never lived up to the age that landon has gone to. Once again, not knocking your point since its a good one but i feel like a better fitting character would either be Mac Callander or a entirely new character. Mac is the only remaining character with some sorta redemption (giving his horse to arthur during the massacre) while his supposed death was the most thought upon. When arthur takes jack out to go fishing, he didn't pay much attention until agent milton mentioned mac's name. That's a sign that mac meant something important to arthur
I think it should be them Recruiting the gang then we so the opposite of rdr1 also a dlc would be the black water heist and when you beat the game and play as arthur (like an RDR two you play as Arthur then John and an RDR one John then Jack) And when you beat the game you can scout out the black water bank
Nah prob a whole different new gang that might have a long fued with the van der linde gang ( maybe even odriscalls) and the last mission would be the van der linde gang killing them all so rdr2 would make sense. Or just forget the vanderlinde gang all together and just create a standalone story with a charachter that keeps going from gang to gang
I don't know. They gave us this game to clarify the gang John Marston was in, from RDR1. I don't think they'll try to squeeze more juice from their story. They may just have somebody start a new gang after the events of RDR2 and RDR1. I know it may not make sense but Rockstar might make it happen for god knows why LOL!!!
you forget that stories must end, we don't need a third redemption game, because the history has already been explored throughly. theres almost nothing to work off of. the only thing they can probably do with the red dead redemption games is make the undead nightmare sequel
I mean, unless rockstar is wanting to continue jacks story past 1914 (prologue of RDR1) then id honestly like to see what other stories they could tell in the Redemption universe without being tied to the van der linde gang
There’s lore in the rdr that says jack marston was the leader of the notorious marston gang that has been hitting banks and terrorizing big cities like Saint Denis in the 1920s that possibly could be red dead 3s story perhaps
I haven't finished rdr2 and 1 but I think a good idea (it's fine to disagree I respect all opinions) would be a new crew, maybe with 1 or 2 people from the old crew in ww2 wandering around a wasteland, staying low for active soldiers
Well, No One Agrees With Me That But, I Would Prefer Rdr3 Is A Collab Game: Blackwater Robbery Chapter 1-6 1899-1907 Marston Epilogue 1-2 Rdr1 Remake (Same Graphics And Mechanics With Rdr2) Probably It Would Be 200GB Lol
there is no redemption in those predictions though. I suppose it could be about jack after ww1, struggling to be a gunslinger in a civilized age, and it'd have redemption since jack is completely alone and empty during that time
İf I'm not wrong, i remember there's was two gunslingers who died at blackwater who were belong to van der linde gang, maybe we would see that switchable characters with different honors
What would be redemption in your predicted stories ? Because redemption is the most important its the name of the series, in your predictions there will be no redemptions and redemptions are very important its like resident evil without zombies
In my opinion the van der linde gang stormy is over it would be nice to have a new gang but also as the fan base for the van der linde gang is a lot of people rockstar are more likely to make a game of the past of the van der linde gang Says Dutch van winkle
Red Dead Redemption 3 will most likely never happen. The games are set in a very precise time period. The game would not be set with Jack as the main character since World War I would start during his adulthood. It probably won't be set in 1870-1890 because there isn't enough content surrounding the early days of the gang to make a whole game. Plus, people would want more of the side characters such as Charles and John, who would not be there in that time period. Dutch would not be the main character because we already know the outcome of his story. Any new information we would get would just be fun facts or backstory. Also, the game would not feature a Blackwater mission since the creators intended it to be a secret. That's why the characters in Red Dead Redemption 2 don't talk about it. You are meant to piece things together, and a Blackwater mission would just make it dumbed down. Even if we could get a game that happened in, say, 1930 following Jack, we don't need to know more about him. His story ended when he shot Ross.
I think we should just go further back in time I don’t care what other people say in fact I’m gonna bring up what someone said they said “ oh well *snort* we already know what’s gonna happen to Dutch and Arthur and Hosea they’re all gonna survive☝️🤓” b***h that’s the same premises of rented to we knew that John was going to survive yet people were still concerned about him getting shot in the shoulder we knew that he was going to survive you it is per claim that it’s the best game of Rockstars entire creations so don’t even try to tell me that there’s a reasonable reason that we can’t go further back in time for RDR three just tell me one good reason why
Hi , I got used to ae a bit and have already applied to discord, but the nickname is wrong, probably the correct nickname is in add friends and the correct nickname will be written there at the bottom
I'm expecting it to be before blackwater but the last mission would be blackwater massacre
but what would u do after the blackwater massacre the pinkertons would be after u and u cant roam around in the snow after escaping
@@reddeadmp4 maybe but in rdr2 they don't come chasing after you in free roam so it might be the same shi as rdr2
@@styriafilms bounty
@@reddeadmp4play as mac
@@MarcPres-tg1im fr
Imagine RDR 3 being just RDR2 but from Micah's perspective...
Lol
🤣🤣
@@Fenasilegend lol
There's a mod for that
@@FentonVanderlinde which
the gang when it newly started would be the best option in my opinion
samee
But it can't be called redemption
@@GRTYummyDonutsMCRed Dead Revolver 2
@@GasStationRecipes hell yeah
@@GRTYummyDonutsMCwhatever lol
I heard somewhere from a insider that 2035 is the possible dead line and they spent 2 years brainstorming ideas for the games story
oh
A start wild west/end of the American civil war game for rdr3 would go so hard. Imagine having civil war battles where you get to go pick a side between the union or the confederates in the encounter. Or a civil war game where you play as one of the many pro-confederate guerilla groups that had existed back then and the end of the game is when the civil war ends and the protagonist is now just an a lone outlaw drifting across the barren and dead deserts in the beginning of the wild west and the guerilla group either splits up or becomes something more like a gang. A day of the dead DLC with black and neon themes that takes place in Mexico would be a nice touch as well.
Some things i wouldn't wanna see are the cleche ideas of "the origins of the van der lidne gang leading up to the blackwater massacre" or "Jack Marston's adventures after killing edgar ross and being drafted to ww1" or "Sadie Adler in south america" in my opinion all of those ideas are close ended and lack freedom. The van der linde gangs whole story ended when Jack shot Edgar and as sad as it is the community really needs to start accepting that or rdr3's gonna be mid.
fr
How Dutch and Hosea met and and how they started the gang and going through robbery’s trying to get a name for themselves
yeah
I want to see Landon Ricketts in his prime 💪💪
samee
The voice actor is dead tho
we can get a new one
this deserves more likes.
thanks
It would be rdr3 shows formation of gang and from dutch perspective whole game and how he take in arthur and hosea
where redemption
@@reddeadmp4 ?
@@KartikeyaTomar-t4j where would be the redemption
@@reddeadmp4 ik there wouldnt be much redemption but i think there might be after davey dies in blackwater masscare
yeah
Tbh I’d love to see the early days of the gang. Maybe experience Annabelle’s death and the Blackwater robbery? I think doing it from Davey’s perspective would be really cool too!
same bro the early days of the gang
or macs perspective
rdr1 and its prequel have a different character of which you don't know what will their fate be at the end of their respective game. think of that what you will but the blackwater massacre isn't shown for a reason, you're supposed to make out what happened there from what the other characters tell you. it has plot holes for the player to fill those gaps with their imagination on what could've happened. that kind of writing worked better than being spoonfed the answer
hm
I’d really love to see the gang right when Dutch and Hosea picked up 14 yr old Arthur.
hm
Either a new story, Charles in Canada, or Mac Callander
charles in canada was in part 1 of this series, mac callander ye
It would be cool if you played before the blackwater massacre and you played as Dutch and got to control the gang when you completed all the missions and get to set up your own train jobs and bank jobs
yeah frfr
I'm betting it will be with Landon Ricketts and his story, perhaps it will be a more solitary story without a specific gang, but still with striking secondary characters in the style that the rockstar knows how to do it
(maybe tell how the BM was but not from Landon's perspective, because he was there)
guess we will see
I wanna see the gang form and play as Hosea
yes
Main Story: Gang before BM
Epilogue: Jack after RDR1 Ending
hm
Maybe Jack goes to fight in ww1 maybe?
@@sscp4975 Nah.. WW1 doesn't really fit RDR...But if RDR and HD GTA are in same universe then maybe other game as Jack being main character
Nah games over
nah he wont
What is this talk about the young Dutch? Hes as strong as he's ever been
fr
i get the joke
underrated comment
same
fr
Imagine RDR3 being a GTA5 like game. You have characters to play through like Dutch or Micah. The beginning of their legacy like a you're reading through a journal.
hm
@@reddeadmp4 RDR and RDR2 just put you in Arthur or John’s perspective, ever tell you how they got there.
@@icyblueberrypie yes
Imagine one covering jack and his struggle as an outlaw In a world with no place for him maby 🤷♂️
fr
@@reddeadmp4It can’t be about the gang member other than Jack he’s the only one who he chased after no one else in the gang will be chased but Jack isn’t in the gang so the story about the Van Der Linde gang is finished
@@Goofy_man797 hm
Could be arthurs dad. Remember what arthur said about him(an outlaw, tough guy) . His father passed his things to Arthur(just like Arthur did with john and john did with jack) and Arthur watched him die, a perfect revenge option(if he revenged him) also considering how things happens in rdr universe Arthur to john, john to jack. İt will be possibly someone to Arthur and the best one i can think about is his dad
yeah
Or maybe arthurs dad but the best would be blackwater heist
blackwater heist can be dlc
yeah a rdr2 prequel would be amazing
yeah
I feel like if it had anything to do with the rdr2 gang, the main character would most likely be Davey, his death was given a lot of hype in the beginning of rdr2
davey or mac fr
maybe even switchable between davey and mac
@@reddeadmp4 Maybe mac but definitely not davey. There's no sign of redemption just looking through the dialogue about him but there is some for mac. I dunno, sometimes rockstar likes to change alot of things
hm
Doubt it's gonna be about the gang. There would be no redemption part in that. Just a game about outlaws. It would be better if they'd follow another character like one of the native Americans who was riding with Eagle Flies to the Cornwall factory in chapter 6 and managed to survive so he goes on a revenge mission for his fallen brothers but finds redemption later on, or something like that.
davey and mac
@@reddeadmp4 They had no redemption, lol. It's stated in the game that one of them was a racist and the other just a murderer like Micah.
hm
Possibly jack, redemption in the story terms is one paying for their sins, and a downfall, also the story is about the downfall of west, jack became the last gun slinger, why not his downfall.
fr
I mean, the only thing i know would be jacks story to continue with, soooo🤷♂️
thats just ww1 or jack being a writer
Realistically story wise it would make sense to do something with Jack, but considering the world at that point there wouldn't be much to do that has the wild west theme, he'd just be a criminal, and as much as I love the boy, he'd probably die real early on in life. Another prequel would be best, I'd personally love something with young Dutch, Arthur, Hosea, and John, but to make another prequel there'd probably be even more things that wouldn't make sense in the later games (like how John just doesn't bring up Arthur and Hosea in rdr1 despite growing up with them, there'd probably be something that should be mentioned in rdr2 that isn't if they do that)
yes
I'd love rd3 to end with blackwater or just before the blackwater events so it still remains a mystery
fr
IMO, I think it should be about Jack fighting in WW1 since RDR1 story ends in 1914, the same year WW1 breaks out. He probably wouldn’t want to fight for the same government that killed his father, plus the US joined WW1 in 1917, near the end of the war. If he fought in WW1 he could’ve gone to Canada and enlisted into the Canadian army since they were in the war from the start and the story would be longer.
idk
It would be quite cool if they made it so the main character is Arthur’s dad doing crimes
yes
> Birth of Jack Marston
> Young Arthur and his Family
> Younger Uncle
> Young John
fr
I think they will not make the VDL gang the main focus anymore, with it being some vigilante, bounty hunter or hell even another gang would be cool. Maybe the Van Der Lindes being friends would be lovely tho
yeah and option to switch between every member of the gang if its vdl or new gang
Life of jack as he went thru all the WW
where would be redemption and etc
I think jack should be the main character during rdr3 and i alredy can see the comments saying that its the end of the wild west in ww1 is happening but the reason why i still want it like that because i can imagine jack living a life of being a ruthless gunslinger with no one else in his life but throughout the game he has to accept to move on from the pass in embrace the future and ends up doing good things and sence jack dies in 1990 the game can do a time skip in kill him off in either a rival challenging him or just by age but thats just me
Thatd be really boring. He was just a writer for the rest if his life
@@Weaponsaddict no he wasn't he became a gunslinger in put those aside
@@Weaponsaddict and also you can't judge a book by its cover
@@TheEurofighter100 thats just a saying little dude. There was a book that was written by him in gta 5. The red dead redemption story is over
@@Weaponsaddict you never know that may what rockstar might want you to think and also why are you calling me little dude when you joined two weeks ago lol
W edit
thanks
I feel like there gonna do a whole other thing that doesn’t even connect to the first or second but they will put hints of them in there
yeah
Mac Callander story to blackwater massacre
yeah but the law will chase us for ages after that
i like how it remains secretive on what happens within the massacre, we don't really need the answer spoonfed to us through the next game starring callender brothers, why bother make a game which you cant even fully complete after the game ends, either davey nor mac can get a redemption, their fate was sealed
@@trippingums hm
I think it can be arthur dads prespective and the epilogue would be arthur entering the gang
yeah maybe
I think people forgot that in order for it to be a "Red Dead Redemption" game there has to be a "Redemption" arc in it. It can't just be a game telling a story about the gang in the early days, no what made rdr2 so great. Is that it was set in a time, where the gang was ending so that Arthur and John could try and achieve redemption for all they did.
Thats why i think, rockstar could try something with Landon Ricketts. Since we only met him when he was old, and we know nothing of his past. Only that he was a gunslinger so, there is potentiel for a good game in him.
You have a valid point but from what we know already, landon has always been seen as a heroic figure. You look at arthur and john, they are heroes by definition but they still ended up dying due to their bad living. If landon had some sorta dark past and later redeemed himself, he probably would've died earlier. Most gunslingers have never lived up to the age that landon has gone to.
Once again, not knocking your point since its a good one but i feel like a better fitting character would either be Mac Callander or a entirely new character.
Mac is the only remaining character with some sorta redemption (giving his horse to arthur during the massacre) while his supposed death was the most thought upon.
When arthur takes jack out to go fishing, he didn't pay much attention until agent milton mentioned mac's name. That's a sign that mac meant something important to arthur
yeah i forgor redemption
ye
@@GhostOfKenshin Mac could also have som potentie. I forgot about him, a whole new character could also be pretty cool to.
yes
I think it should be them Recruiting the gang then we so the opposite of rdr1 also a dlc would be the black water heist and when you beat the game and play as arthur (like an RDR two you play as Arthur then John and an RDR one John then Jack) And when you beat the game you can scout out the black water bank
yees
Nah prob a whole different new gang that might have a long fued with the van der linde gang ( maybe even odriscalls) and the last mission would be the van der linde gang killing them all so rdr2 would make sense. Or just forget the vanderlinde gang all together and just create a standalone story with a charachter that keeps going from gang to gang
yeah new gang makes sense
who would you even play as when the game ends?
@@trippingums new gang new characters we dont know
And getting the people that didn’t die back together
ye
I don't know. They gave us this game to clarify the gang John Marston was in, from RDR1. I don't think they'll try to squeeze more juice from their story. They may just have somebody start a new gang after the events of RDR2 and RDR1. I know it may not make sense but Rockstar might make it happen for god knows why LOL!!!
ye
Red H. need a new game
red dead revolver 2
Maybe a Uncle history?
@@Mako-Peixe i doubt he did anything
you forget that stories must end, we don't need a third redemption game, because the history has already been explored throughly. theres almost nothing to work off of. the only thing they can probably do with the red dead redemption games is make the undead nightmare sequel
nah we need 3rd frfrfrfr
but i understand ur point
They can still make prequels
@@pickelhaubert3730 hm
@@pickelhaubert3730 there is no point, as i've stated in this very comment
I mean, unless rockstar is wanting to continue jacks story past 1914 (prologue of RDR1) then id honestly like to see what other stories they could tell in the Redemption universe without being tied to the van der linde gang
hm
My prediction: Red Dead Revolver 2 where we play as Sadie and hunt down bounties
red dead revolver is a different universe bro
Jack complete history.
no it would just be a writer or ww1
The story line will get so confusing with a sequel/ prequel of a prequel.
ye
There’s lore in the rdr that says jack marston was the leader of the notorious marston gang that has been hitting banks and terrorizing big cities like Saint Denis in the 1920s that possibly could be red dead 3s story perhaps
BRO SUCH A GREAT IDEA
I haven't finished rdr2 and 1 but I think a good idea (it's fine to disagree I respect all opinions) would be a new crew, maybe with 1 or 2 people from the old crew in ww2 wandering around a wasteland, staying low for active soldiers
new gang yeah but ww2 nah
@@reddeadmp4 I knew that
@@OFAndre5kTheYelien w
I think it would be rlly cool if we got an in between game for that sort of thing kinda like spider man mikes morales
yeah
Amazing edit bro ❤
I want after effects so badly ❤
i can get u it
@@reddeadmp4how?
@@TravisGamerGod message me discord reddeadmp4
@@reddeadmp4 alright
@@reddeadmp4I sent you a friend request because I got new phone
Or….. or…. Maybe we see what Jack Marston is up to after the revenge on Ross?
hes up to writing
Id like to see ww1 or post ww1 era rdr with more guns, and urbanization. Itd be Red Dead with a touch of GTA. Maybe playing as jack.
fr
how can you make a game about the wild west taking place in the heart of ww1. + where would the redemption even be?
@@trippingumsyeah, makes sense
I would like to see gang before blackwater masacre amd see how does
Jenny looks like
and mac and davey , young colm o driscoll, anabelle
The second one doesn’t make very much sense because it wouldn’t give a lot to work with
yeah fair
Arthur Morgan's dad before he dies-death and then Arthur and young van der linde gang
lyle morgannn
They should do a dlc for rdr2 about the start of the gang
yes
Well, No One Agrees With Me That But, I Would Prefer Rdr3 Is A Collab Game:
Blackwater Robbery
Chapter 1-6
1899-1907 Marston
Epilogue 1-2
Rdr1 Remake (Same Graphics And Mechanics With Rdr2)
Probably It Would Be 200GB Lol
that would be soooooooooo goood
@@reddeadmp4Thank You 😇
np
I think the game should start at young Dutch and Hosea getting 14 year old Arthur and the end being the backwater massacre
Also you play as Dutch
yes
jack in the ww1 battlefield
fr
I believe that it should be based on dutch and Colm before they became enemies
where would be the redemption
Yeah just realised that after writing that
@@omega.-.1368 ye
How about jack Marston and the new world (the one wwith almost no outlaw) the new world or strict law and order
hm
Mac Callender thats just me though
nah aint u only fr
Every prediction is really cool but I will wish John Marston 1907-1910 but I think it will be the Third
thanks
No problem
@@Fenasilegend ok
it cant be because all it would be is just a normal family living on a barn, it wouldn't be Red dead redemption 2 anymore
True
I think its gonna be we play as davey or Mac
yeah me too
Maybe it will be jack after rdr1
i dont think that will happen
there is no redemption in those predictions though. I suppose it could be about jack after ww1, struggling to be a gunslinger in a civilized age, and it'd have redemption since jack is completely alone and empty during that time
ye
İf I'm not wrong, i remember there's was two gunslingers who died at blackwater who were belong to van der linde gang, maybe we would see that switchable characters with different honors
ye
What would be redemption in your predicted stories ? Because redemption is the most important its the name of the series, in your predictions there will be no redemptions and redemptions are very important its like resident evil without zombies
fair
Playing as dutch wouldn’t make sense, he never had a redemption and the honor system wouldn’t work
rockstar can make anything work
We don’t need to play as Dutch or any gang members the gangs story is over
ye
but mac and davey
The thing you can be sure is that the main character is going to die.
yeah
What font is that
chinese rocks
Absolutely no. We need new character and new stories. We know everything about this set of characters and the story is done
Facts
fr
yes
Read dead emancipation with a new character and Hosea in 1865 - idk yet
ok
We should be able to mac or Davey and the starting of the van der linde gang w
mac or davey frfr
Imagine if it was Dutch starting the gang was ine
yeah and we would play as mac or davey and redeem ourselves
@@reddeadmp4 Fr but we probably gon be old as hell when it’s comes out in like 2030
@@ZerkskieCC ye
It wouldn't be john marston between 1907 & 1911 because he lived a normal life
hm
Im hoping for a continuation of jack Marston
nice
It could be with jack
maybe
Mybee arther have a sun and now coming to gzt revenge . Or playing with jack mybee
yes
Whay if Red dead 3 is about young edgar ross 💀
nahh
Mac callander...
yes
In my opinion the van der linde gang stormy is over it would be nice to have a new gang but also as the fan base for the van der linde gang is a lot of people rockstar are more likely to make a game of the past of the van der linde gang
Says Dutch van winkle
yeah
That would be cool if they put the blackwater massacre as a mission in rdr3
yes fr
guys subscribe pls
Jack after 1914
that will be just ww1 or some writer
What about a whole new story new characters but Arthur or John or even Dutch is like the final boss and they kill you
yes maybe
Red Dead Redemption 3 will most likely never happen. The games are set in a very precise time period. The game would not be set with Jack as the main character since World War I would start during his adulthood. It probably won't be set in 1870-1890 because there isn't enough content surrounding the early days of the gang to make a whole game. Plus, people would want more of the side characters such as Charles and John, who would not be there in that time period. Dutch would not be the main character because we already know the outcome of his story. Any new information we would get would just be fun facts or backstory. Also, the game would not feature a Blackwater mission since the creators intended it to be a secret. That's why the characters in Red Dead Redemption 2 don't talk about it. You are meant to piece things together, and a Blackwater mission would just make it dumbed down. Even if we could get a game that happened in, say, 1930 following Jack, we don't need to know more about him. His story ended when he shot Ross.
ok
I want to play as dutch
same
i want a different story other than the van der linde gang
Fr
yeah new gang could work
ye new gang works
but being friend w van der linde gang would be cool
What about Arthur’s son being alive and Arthur’s son story
yes
I think we should just go further back in time I don’t care what other people say in fact I’m gonna bring up what someone said they said “ oh well *snort* we already know what’s gonna happen to Dutch and Arthur and Hosea they’re all gonna survive☝️🤓” b***h that’s the same premises of rented to we knew that John was going to survive yet people were still concerned about him getting shot in the shoulder we knew that he was going to survive you it is per claim that it’s the best game of Rockstars entire creations so don’t even try to tell me that there’s a reasonable reason that we can’t go further back in time for RDR three just tell me one good reason why
ye
if they do make a Red Dead 3 who redeems themselves?
mac
This is on my for you page
w
Mexican revolution
hm
all these ideas suck, we need an officer rdr3 redemption, and we need a Rdr2 DLC about Aliens or something
rdr2 dlc isnt related to this edit, we dont need officer rdr3 its a game about outlaws bro but respected opinion
@@reddeadmp4 No you are so wrong, its a game about the wild west, and getting a redemption, it does not have to be a outlaw or a gunslinger game,
@@GarryVIDS331 yes
@@GarryVIDS331 but its mostly about outlaws
@@reddeadmp4 yeah...Because that's the first two games? Red Dead can be anything, only if its in the wild west
Play as Lenny’s grandpa if you know what I mean
💀
Let's make a collaboration?
ok, discord: reddeadmp477
but not rn later when u switch to ae
@@reddeadmp4 alright, but this probably won't be very soon
@@bloodyedit_ae ok
Hi , I got used to ae a bit and have already applied to discord, but the nickname is wrong, probably the correct nickname is in add friends and the correct nickname will be written there at the bottom