ESV Thompson Chain Reference Bible

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 май 2024
  • Zondervan has released the updated version of the Thompson Chain Reference Bible in the 2016 ESV. It matches the Comfort Print TCRs in every way except for the typeface.
    Purchase (affiliates)
    Amazon - amzn.to/4bLKLDK
    Christianbook - www.christianbook.com/Christi...
    Thompson Chain-Reference Sermon Notebook - amzn.to/3wVFev2
    Written review - biblebuyingguide.com/esv-thom...
    Zondervan provided this Bible in exchange for an honest review.

Комментарии • 14

  • @OleHaynes
    @OleHaynes Месяц назад +1

    I've always been a huge fan of of the TCR and owned several of them and given away many for gifts! I switched to predominantly ESV years ago, so this has been a long wait for me to finally see the new updated edition!

  • @ScottManser-eu2pg
    @ScottManser-eu2pg 25 дней назад +1

    While the ESV isn't my favorite translation, the TCR is a great bible study tool. Very good quality bible. Nice review.

  • @LXRY
    @LXRY 22 часа назад

    5:42 that’s a very nice Bible, does the cat come with it?

  • @OleHaynes
    @OleHaynes Месяц назад

    A complaint that I have though is the paragraph format verses the VBV format. As a study reference Bible, the TCR to me makes more sense and in my opinion is much easier to read and visualize in the KJV and NKJV which ARE Verse Format (or Verse by Verse) the paragraph format is more busy and cluttered (in my opinion) than the much easier to use KJV and NKJV editions. I understand that there are some copyright issues with the NIV in creating the text into VBV, but the ESV has had several Verse Format editions, and I would have much more preferred to see this copied the KJV and NKJV in that line. Like I mentioned, using the TCR as predominantly or largely a study reference Bible, this complaint makes sense. And I think if users compare the experience of the differences, people will agree.

  • @jkdbuck7670
    @jkdbuck7670 Месяц назад +2

    Odd that it isn't Comfort Print. Oh well. Thanks for the review.

  • @fnjesusfreak
    @fnjesusfreak Месяц назад

    I suppose Comfort Print only exists for translations that Harper-Collins usually publishes, and ESV isn't one of them. They seem to have made heavy use of Helvetica as a typeface, but I haven't identified the base font.

  • @mikelilley
    @mikelilley Месяц назад +2

    I own the NASB95 Thompson Chain. My question is, are all the chain references across the various translations the same? Would I benefit from getting the ESV version, in terms of different or new chains? I can't seem to find anything published data on this.

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  Месяц назад +2

      They're the same. I mentioned this in the review.

    • @mikelilley
      @mikelilley Месяц назад

      @BibleBuyingGuide You lost me at no Comfort Print and the cockling.$120 for a Korean Bible? I have been waiting for your review for some time now and was disappointed in the details. If there were new chains or better paper, I may have considered, but the comfort print is a must these days. It's such a game changer for men with older eyes.

  • @super60sand70s
    @super60sand70s Месяц назад

    I believe the font is 9.5.

  • @Adrian_Mason
    @Adrian_Mason Месяц назад

    I have been seriously tempted by the NIV TCR but I haven't owned a TCR, and having watched hours of reviews, I noticed some references that seem to be just word match wasting space and time.
    1)Are they good for linking prophecy from Daniel, Zechariah and Revelation?
    2)I am also upset that the NIV isn't line matched. In fact the entire Zondervan NIV line is broken by this 🤬 It does appear that they may use thicker paper on their NIV line?

  • @elizabethdaniel646
    @elizabethdaniel646 Месяц назад

    I have the niv one