INE Live Webinar: Understanding Inter-AS L3VPN - Option A/B/C

Working towards your CCIE Service Provider Lab certification? Want to learn how service providers connect customers when transiting over multiple providers, or how to configure Inter-As Options A, B nd C? If so, join INE instructor Rohit Pardasani for an interactive session on Understanding and Implementing Inter-As OptionA/B/C solution and their differences. Familiarity with L3VPN is advised, but not required to join this session.
The best way to become an expert, is to learn from one. INE continues to advance that philosophy, applying it to the digital age, and cultivating tomorrow’s leaders. Be part of a process that has worked for centuries. Find your path today: ine.com/pages/networking

[@Pyffistik]

Thank you very much! You have a talent of a teacher!

[@sergeyrar]

Very good explanation, thanks!
By the way - If anyone is wondering, PHP (Penultimate Hop Popping) is used to save an MPLS table lookup on the egress PE router. This is possible since the egress PE router is the last router in the MPLS backbone and doesn't need to further send the packet down an LSP.

[@mojdomu4883]

Great study guide for having good visibility and understanding on 3 of inter-as options . Thanks for this webinar. Total useful 2 hrs .

[@Pankaj268hp]

Thanks for sharing it on a open platform.

[@AM-vr6ej]

This is just a masterpiece. Thanks a bunch for wonderful explanation. Would be nice to see L2VPN inter-AS hands-op presentations upcoming.

[@Torcheban]

Thx, Rohit. Really like your style! Everything is right and clear.

[@nilamanisarma2981]

Wonderful explanation. Thanks.

[@yuvarajthirunavukkarasu4932]

Detailed explanation of inter-as use cases. Great video. would love to listen on mpls-te

[@chillavasu93]

@@zouhairsouam6709 0pⁿplk0

[@ferozsyed2014]

Thala have some doubts

[@daneshnadarajan3692]

1:04:18 starting for option b

[@eazi-bonlife7298]

You Sir, are a legend ❤❤

[@jorgegil13283]

Wonderful explanation

[@AmrElAmrawy]

Just posting a note: "XR Routers cannot label switch if the route is not a /32" 1:20:00

[@andrewohanian5132]

Is there no workaround for this besides configuring a static /32 route?

[@friendstalk807]

Very useful , thank you so much 👍👍

[@joeylee7740]

Hey Rohit! You're freakin awesome man! That Option C is some complex shit! I like Option B the best.

[@omayer111]

really a damn good webinar

[@wuyipiano]

Option A 7:26
Option B 1:02:15
Option C 1:22:46
---
32:49 About the timing to configure rt (import/export).
1:36:43 Add the route-reflector-client command which he forgot.

[@UsmanAli-ob6sf]

Hi Guys, I tried the lab for InterAS OptionC, but I am getting 2 labels in stack. Although ping is working fine, why my ASBR (IPv4+Label) didnt add a new label? Any help would be appreciated.

[@vishwasvishwakarma2892]

awesome

[@esbava]

Kudos 👌

[@smailmilak]

It could be that ping was not working with Option C because MPLS was not enable on the TE interface.

[@vishwasvishwakarma6272]

Awesome

[@temesgenden635]

Very useful!!! 👍👍

[@INEtraining]

Glad to hear that!

[@iqbalanwar7803]

excellent explanation of inter-AS options. appreciate your efforts