PSA Submission Reveal: Disappointing Grades on 80s 90s Bird, Jordan, Cards & Skenes Rookies!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
  • In this video, Sean unveils his grades for basketball cards from the 80s and 90s and Paul Skenes rookie cards.
    Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more insights into the fascinating world of sports cards!
    Get your Preza Slab Card Case Here:
    prezacards.com...
    OUR FAVORITE PRODUCTS
    Graded Slabs Card Case - prezacards.com...
    Sleeves - amzn.to/3uc9OiL
    Top Loaders - amzn.to/4bliGDl
    Card Saver 1s - amzn.to/3OtYhCg
    Sign Up to Sell on Mercari - merc.li/gnEfvvPsb
    FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
    RalphieBoy Cards and Collectibles
    Instagram / ralphieboycards_collec...
    Ebay Store www.ebay.com/s...
    Gym Class Cards
    Instagram - / gymclasscards
    www.ebay.com/u...
    TheSportsCardsTeachers
    Instagram - / thesportscardteachers
    Subscribe to this RUclips channel:
    RUclips - / @thesportscardteachers
    For Business Inquiries, contact us:
    TheSportsCardTeachers@gmail.com
    #sportscards #psagrading #psa

Комментарии • 50

  • @Mrdoubtfire23
    @Mrdoubtfire23 3 месяца назад

    Wow super clean should be PSA10

  • @lennieouimette820
    @lennieouimette820 3 месяца назад +1

    Ok so just from your videos my two cents - pippen - centering white specking on the dark area by his head, Bird - card is slightly off cut and white on the back corner as you mentioned, Rodman clean back pretty good centering, reggie white spot on bottom border bottom left corner edge, jordan base crazy heavy centering and white edges on back, jordan all star off on the back edges are bad terrible centering, bird 2nd year centering, huge defect on the back and front surface looks to have micro scratches, bird is not a little its a lot back corner is damaged. i dont see a problem with these grades... not sure why it would be dissapointing

  • @sisterraysbrother
    @sisterraysbrother 3 месяца назад

    not sending in modern w/ older cards is a reasonable theory. what I wouldn't do, though, is submit cards for someone else w/ my cards. that is, unless they are all in a condition comparable to your own cards. my theory is that the presentation of your submission (new semi-rigid holders, new penny sleeves, same type of holders and sleeves) along with some consistency with the cards you are submitting will give you a higher floor. I am into vintage where conditions fluctuate wildly and this, I believe, has worked to my advantage.

  • @jaymedorr4119
    @jaymedorr4119 4 месяца назад +2

    That was my advice!!! Thanks for the shoutout. Those 80’s cards are sharp amongst each other, but not necessarily against brand new Skenes crispy fresh cards. You should see slight improvement by separating by years/eras. I generally use 2000 and up and seems to work better for me. Good luck. Keep up the good work

  • @SmokinSportsCards
    @SmokinSportsCards 3 месяца назад

    The Dennis Rodman is definitely thicker on the left so I don’t know how they are grading these but I just submitted my first two submissions to PSA and I’m kind of worried. I may stick with SGC.

    • @TheSportsCardTeachers
      @TheSportsCardTeachers  2 месяца назад

      Let us know how you do!

    • @SmokinSportsCards
      @SmokinSportsCards 2 месяца назад

      @ I’m about to upload the video soon, but I actually did really good way better than I thought

  • @cloudsey420sufccards
    @cloudsey420sufccards 3 месяца назад

    Sweet cards bro. Better luck in the next one! 👊 😎

  • @sisterraysbrother
    @sisterraysbrother 3 месяца назад

    one other thought.. are you looking at the cards under a 10 loupe? asking because you re-examined the corners but didn't say anything about the edges which are harder to assess with the naked eye.

  • @craigs.t.3321
    @craigs.t.3321 3 месяца назад +1

    This submission definitely is not a PSA issue. Most the cards you sent in were grossly off centered. Personally I thought you did pretty well in the grades you received.
    I do hope you sent these cards strictly for PC purposes and not for trying to make any type of profit.. even all these coming back 9’s prob isn’t recouping the grading cost.

  • @ktc629
    @ktc629 3 месяца назад

    Whats the rational with not sending 90s cards with modern cards?

    • @TheSportsCardTeachers
      @TheSportsCardTeachers  3 месяца назад

      That the grader sees the condition of newer cards with newer manufacturing technology and would compare it to 80s and 90s stuff and make a human judgment based on that.

  • @jayfarrell2959
    @jayfarrell2959 4 месяца назад +4

    How? Easy you're letting a grading company who owns a Auction house that their bank name is under. It's easy to grade low to keep pop #'s down so when you psa buts high graded cards or god forbid grades their own cards higher puts more money in their pockets along with Beckett . Not hard to understand both grading companies Auction House's aren't the same name foe a reason and it's not well we might get them crossed up at the bank it's to low ball you to pad their pockets .Should not be legal to own both! PERIOD!!!

  • @godisgreat8462
    @godisgreat8462 4 месяца назад

    Keep rocking the videos my friend 🎉🎉

  • @keithbuschman2732
    @keithbuschman2732 4 месяца назад

    What would be the reason not to grade new and older together?
    I just sent a pSA mix of 1980’s and Early 2010’s, and then current.
    My worst grade was current. And card looks perfect.
    I got better grades on 1985 Topps black border football cards. And got all 9’s on 2010’s cards.

    • @TheSportsCardTeachers
      @TheSportsCardTeachers  3 месяца назад

      Just the comparison between new and old, grader may be thrown off considering the newer cards should appear nicer even though older cards could be 10s but production was just different

    • @ktc629
      @ktc629 3 месяца назад

      @@TheSportsCardTeachers I take it a different direction, I have some sharp really clean 80s cards that look like 9s or better the 10s that the grader is gonna give me on modern cards will justify the 9 or 10 on the 80 cards. Its the completely opposite way of looking at it, now if the 80s cards are not as crisp as the modern then the card doesnt deserve a 10. Makes total sense to me

  • @chrismiles6694
    @chrismiles6694 3 месяца назад +1

    No one smart would buy that Rodman for 3 bucks. An 8 all day.

  • @aaacomp1
    @aaacomp1 4 месяца назад +1

    Who pays to grade 1989 fleer? And he also says he picked the best centered cards, but within a nanosecond of him showing it, i saw that they weren't centered. LOL

    • @frankspicci9994
      @frankspicci9994 4 месяца назад

      He said he Picked "His" Best Centered cards. Did you ever think that his other cards were worse centered which would make these "His" Best? Just Curious if you didn't think about that before making a Rude Comment.

    • @aaacomp1
      @aaacomp1 4 месяца назад +1

      @@frankspicci9994 these cards are trash. No reason to pay psa to grade them. I could understand the 80 bird but the condition doesn't warrant it. Just because you have the cards doesn't mean they should be graded. Easy enough to use your eyes before wasting $

    • @W13-i7q
      @W13-i7q 3 месяца назад

      @@frankspicci9994not a rude comment snowflake.

    • @TheSportsCardTeachers
      @TheSportsCardTeachers  2 месяца назад

      Yes, they were the best centered. Just don’t understand how Rodman could have been a 10 given the centering

    • @TheSportsCardTeachers
      @TheSportsCardTeachers  2 месяца назад

      Appreciate you. Thanks for checking out the video

  • @godisgreat8462
    @godisgreat8462 4 месяца назад

    Hello from the rising sun Japan 🇯🇵

    • @TheSportsCardTeachers
      @TheSportsCardTeachers  2 месяца назад

      You really in Japan?

    • @godisgreat8462
      @godisgreat8462 2 месяца назад

      @ yes. I moved here 38 years ago and I teach at the University and do volunteer work at the hospitals for kids with cancer. I make videos as well for my RUclips channel

  • @frankspicci9994
    @frankspicci9994 4 месяца назад

    Jordan is Pretty off Both Top to bottom and Left to Right. That's why it is a 7. Nothing to do with the rest of the card. I have been Regularly Grading for 24 years. Sometime you just know that the card isn't going to get better than a certain Grade based solely on One Issue. Centering is a Pretty easy one in a lot of cases. For example, I usually know if a "Gem Mint" card is gonna ba a 9 Mint at best because of the Centering. I hope this helps.

    • @TheSportsCardTeachers
      @TheSportsCardTeachers  3 месяца назад

      Yea, i would say population control has some things to do with grading as well. I’ve sent so many Kobe Topps 1996 RCs that are perfect and continue to get 9s

    • @frankspicci9994
      @frankspicci9994 2 месяца назад

      @@TheSportsCardTeachers I have a PSA order coming back right now with I think around 35 Kobe rookies, including probably 8 Topps so we'll see how bad they murder me. Stay tuned for that video in a week or so.

    • @TheSportsCardTeachers
      @TheSportsCardTeachers  2 месяца назад

      @@frankspicci9994 let’s go! Good luck!

  • @JackBarton-r9s
    @JackBarton-r9s 2 месяца назад

    Screwed by PSA again. We are we letting grading companies dictate the value of our cards.

  • @pezscards3859
    @pezscards3859 3 месяца назад

    PSA is ridic, no way that Bird is a 9 and many other cards made no sense. Grader hungover

  • @toddbartels2866
    @toddbartels2866 4 месяца назад +2

    Disappointed??????????? Maybe go with a different grading company than the crappy PSA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!