Hear Ye! Hear Ye! The purpose of the 2nd amendment as ruled by the Supreme Court in 1939; ""The Constitution, as originally adopted, granted to the Congress power -- "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions". With obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of such forces, the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made."" The difficulty in conveying what Militia is stems from several underlying issues. Going back as far as 1833, Justice Joseph Story notes that "The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic ... yet, though this truth would seem so clear, and the importance of a well regulated militia would seem so undeniable, it cannot be disguised, that among the American people there is a growing indifference to any system of militia discipline..." Justice Story goes on to note that the people may very well lose their rights without the structure and Lawful authority of the Militia. While so many claim to know this topic few actually do. Most simply add to the deceit involved, and the eventual loss of the right without the ability to enforce it as the Founders provided. "The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. "A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline." And further, that ordinarily, when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time." Is that not the analysis that the court sought to employ in Bruen? Yet, we deny what Militia is according to those who placed in the Constitution as the ONLY recognized authority so stated at Article I, Section 8, Clause 15, "to execute the Laws of the Union..." The "individual right theory" is a sham created by so-called pro-2nd organizations for the purpose of collecting contributions and memberships. It has no force of law, creates no office, nor does it impose any duty. It is, in legal contemplation, nothing more than a means of kicking the can down the road until the right is eviscerated and lost. Every state, whose statues I've gone through, contain Militia as able-bodied men between certain ages. Over the years, I've found the true resistance comes from the fact that few want anything to do with serving their communities and country.
That is the 500 pound gorilla in the room. It is during "states of emergency" the need for self protection becomes the most important. It is during a "state of emergency" that the resources of the police are stretched the thinnest and criminals/gangs and looters will take advantage of the citizenry. An armed citizenry is the best "militia" for backup to law enforcement. The problem here is "is the state of emergency real or imagined" (to suit the agenda of an enemy within). Taking down the power grid is a simple flip of a switch (and nearly impossible to prove - and can be blamed on hackers or an EMP riding on a Chinese balloon) a situation which would induce a "state of emergency". Highly sus. A "backdoor state of emergency" could result in the confiscation of firearms which would take forever to unravel, given the glacial speed at which our court/justice system works, and the high costs of utilizing it. Firearms in circulation are estimated to be over 500 million in the U.S. They couldn't store them in any practical way so they would have to destroy them.
Not going to happen un till you realize that all CAPITAL WORDS ARE Military II and that ONLY United States Military II Commission Laws Officers can be in that Offices;
Totally agree. The left is gaming the court on gun control using procedures. The federal court system is mired in procedure. Justice delayed is justice denied.
THE PEOPLE can set this straight tomorrow, sans SCOTUS if we just go ahead and ignore the unconstitutional law. We have the right, and the duty, according to the founding fathers. Nullification is the key! Then we cut out the middle man of the courts and don't have to suffer decades of lawfare tennis. "Shall not be infringed" is only misunderstood by idiots, lawyers and politicians!
Carry is another subject. California is limiting us from going to the range with more than 10 round mags.... Atleast strike down these stupid regulations. and leave ccw up to the states.
I always wondered why our disabled brothers never stepped in on this one? Like a fin grip assumed you have an entire hand to hold a weapon. No vertical forgrip discriminates against those with arthritis lol. i mean damn! where yall at when we need ya!
@@flysquaredya & even those of us with a whole hand can barely hold onto that. 1st thing I changed out. Super dangerous if you can’t control your firearm
It is more than that. When you have a constitutional right and that right is taken from you, it is irreparable. You don't need to have something bad happen where you couldn't defend yourself before you can demonstrate a harm. A right that is taken away is a harm. This is why it is a misnomer that healthcare is a "right". We have a bunch of "lesser rights" in this country that absolutely can be taken away and they are trying to move the 2A to that category.
Exactly! Which means any and all protection tools, not just firearms but ALL arms, regardless of type or how built, shall not be infringed from keeping and bearing, which means owning or possessing, however brief, regardless of quantity, and most importantly, carrying on their person, or nearby, without restriction.
@BN-pd9tf Correct. The proper definition of arms in the context of the 2nd Amendment, when it was written, includes and is not limited to ALL items which can be used to defend one's self, property, country, or anyone or anything else which conceivably requires protection in the form of combative force, both lethal and nonlethal.
Our rights are not defended by the government, it's up to us to defend them, that's what the founding father's told us. We need to learn the constitution!
Thomas Jefferson said the government's purpose is to defend our natural, G*d given rights. When it fails to do so, it is no longer legitimate. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
How right you are! We need to teach the constitution and the bill of rights in school and have a mandatory passing grade on said subjects, not have drag queen story time! All Leo's should study and pass a quiz on the constitution and the bill of rights before any employment as well. Just sayn...
How is the court so confused regarding “shall not be infringed”? Any law restricting a lawful citizen from keeping and bearing arms should be deemed unconstitutional.
I hope we can end the "high capacity" magazine bans too. I'm in Colorado and limited to 15. I'd really like to order some magazines instead of driving to Utah
It seems to me I carried 30 round magazines the whole time I served in the Marines, well except when I carried a belt fed machine gun. They've been in "common use" since Vietnam among civilians as well. I don't need a court to know what my neighbors and the general public owns and uses. It's been fifty years and more "they've been in common use. Our forefathers used and carried the same weapons and armament as were used by the British, we threw out in our secession and establishment of our Republic. As part of the "well armed militia" I expect I'd need the equal or better arms than a "rebellious government" I would be facing. John McClain, GySgt, USMC ret.
Gunny,...I`m glad you have an "L" in your name,...lol! My Dad was 1st Marine Division, 3rd Amphibious Force, WWII in the Pacific, a Rifleman. The finest Man I have ever known.
@@bbivens8263 those were the guys that put me in the Corps, instead of following my dad into the Navy. Great respect for your dad, I spent some time in the Pacific in my years, seen some of the islands, audacious is the word for those who landed. Thanks for the note, it's really appreciated.
The Trump administration needs to bankrupt California, Illinois, New York, and all sanctuary states and states that infringe upon our 2A rights. Get it done!
@FuzzyLumpkins6969 you don't understand how Federal funding works? The states have to pay the federal government but the federal government doesn't have to give them money back. By the way States like California would crap their pants if their Federal funding was cut. California now receives 99 Cents out of every dollar back from the federal government because they are so in the hole
Good luck. MD has had "Assault Weapon Ban" since 2013. Been a constant fight to repeal that since. Finally Scotus is going to make a ruling on that soon though so. Fingers crossed
"Assault weapon" is just a political wording carry hidden agenda to illegalise them. Remember, the first thing Hitler did before he sent all the Jews to the camp was to demonize them. Same plots but just different actors now
One if the best podcasts. The host explains fully the issues coming to and decisions from the Supreme Court. Also other judiciary decisions. Much appreciated as he informs without propaganda.
Why doesn't the Supreme Court make a ruling stating anything infringing on our rights is illegal and not valid and whomever issues such infringements is subject to jail, fines, removal from government, etc. Honestly it is ridiculous to have to say that but the infringements are happening.
Tyrannical government. It refuses to follow its own governing principles. It picks and chooses which ones it wants to adhere to, while ignoring or diluting the content of others.
They actually have stated that any law repugnant to the constitution is void and should be disregarded maybury vs madison (1803) which means all laws that are gun control measures and gun control laws, are null and void it's just not many people have the backbone to disregard what is put in place, because if you had everybody disregarding it and then you have people getting arrested, you can turn around and sue them, and win it's just people don't have the backbone to do it. Which means we need mass noncompliance across every state and county, by every gun owner.
Could you make a video breaking down the "well regulated militia" phrase that is often abused by leftists? I think many viewers here would benefit from it! THANK YOU
If the Constitution is the "supreme law of the land" then _“shall not be infringed”_ literally equals no laws may apply... thus rendering the idea of irreparable harm... moot. If the People wanted the 2A to be susceptible to subjective opinions and laws, then the People should use the method prescribed in the Constitution to CHANGE the 2A to include include language that could be subjectively interpreted.
@@Googlywinker"Well regulated" for the Founders meant well trained, well lead and well equipped. Also, it explains why the keeping and bearing of arms "shall not be infringed", not a limit on the keeping and bearing there of.
@@Googlywinker - and using the language in the context of the time it was written... "militia" = the People (read Madison in Federalist 46), and "regulated" means "functioning"..... not constrained by laws.... read Federalist 46 if you want to know what the 2A is for, it's clearly explained by Madison... _the fella who wrote the 2A_ , and use Websters 1st edition dictionary for the correct context of colonial era language.
@@GooglywinkerNot only do you not realize what militia used to mean, but you haven’t read the 2nd amendment. “the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED “. Keyword “people”.
It infact can cause irreparable injury. The whole point of the 2nd Amendment is so that We the People can defend ourselves against a tyrant government, as well as criminals.
Trump banned bump stocks with the ATF and helped create precedent that allowed the ATF to continue to make new "rules". I don't have a lot of faith that he will be good for the 2a
That is the 500 pound gorilla in the room. It is during "states of emergency" the need for self protection becomes the most important. It is during a "state of emergency" that the resources of the police are stretched the thinnest and criminals/gangs and looters will take advantage of the citizenry. An armed citizenry is the best "militia" for backup to law enforcement. The problem here is "is the state of emergency real or imagined" (to suit the agenda of an enemy within). Taking down the power grid is a simple flip of a switch (and nearly impossible to prove - and can be blamed on hackers or an EMP riding on a Chinese balloon) a situation which would induce a "state of emergency". Highly sus. A "backdoor state of emergency" could result in the confiscation of firearms which would take forever to unravel, given the glacial speed at which our court/justice system works, and the high costs of utilizing it. Firearms in circulation are estimated to be over 500 million in the U.S. They couldn't store them in any practical way so they would have to destroy them.
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
Please support the channel by liking the video and subscribing!
Why? Because Joe Biden lives there? Or just because they're libs?
Comment for al gores rhythm!!!
Hear Ye! Hear Ye! The purpose of the 2nd amendment as ruled by the Supreme Court in 1939; ""The Constitution, as originally adopted, granted to the Congress power --
"To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions". With obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of such forces, the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made.""
The difficulty in conveying what Militia is stems from several underlying issues. Going back as far as 1833, Justice Joseph Story notes that "The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic ... yet, though this truth would seem so clear, and the importance of a well regulated militia would seem so undeniable, it cannot be disguised, that among the American people there is a growing indifference to any system of militia discipline..."
Justice Story goes on to note that the people may very well lose their rights without the structure and Lawful authority of the Militia. While so many claim to know this topic few actually do. Most simply add to the deceit involved, and the eventual loss of the right without the ability to enforce it as the Founders provided.
"The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. "A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline." And further, that ordinarily, when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time." Is that not the analysis that the court sought to employ in Bruen? Yet, we deny what Militia is according to those who placed in the Constitution as the ONLY recognized authority so stated at Article I, Section 8, Clause 15, "to execute the Laws of the Union..."
The "individual right theory" is a sham created by so-called pro-2nd organizations for the purpose of collecting contributions and memberships. It has no force of law, creates no office, nor does it impose any duty. It is, in legal contemplation, nothing more than a means of kicking the can down the road until the right is eviscerated and lost. Every state, whose statues I've gone through, contain Militia as able-bodied men between certain ages. Over the years, I've found the true resistance comes from the fact that few want anything to do with serving their communities and country.
the only thing that keeps me from subbing is you asking me to. stop it
That is the 500 pound gorilla in the room. It is during "states of emergency" the need for self protection becomes the most important. It is during a "state of emergency" that the resources of the police are stretched the thinnest and criminals/gangs and looters will take advantage of the citizenry. An armed citizenry is the best "militia" for backup to law enforcement. The problem here is "is the state of emergency real or imagined" (to suit the agenda of an enemy within). Taking down the power grid is a simple flip of a switch (and nearly impossible to prove - and can be blamed on hackers or an EMP riding on a Chinese balloon) a situation which would induce a "state of emergency". Highly sus. A "backdoor state of emergency" could result in the confiscation of firearms which would take forever to unravel, given the glacial speed at which our court/justice system works, and the high costs of utilizing it. Firearms in circulation are estimated to be over 500 million in the U.S. They couldn't store them in any practical way so they would have to destroy them.
The Founders were not interested in limiting specific types of weapons. They were interested in limiting specific types of government.
Ding. This. You are the correct one.
💯
I'll have to remember that one.
@@johnwayne2103 same here
14th amendment
Now that the Republicans will hold the White House and both houses of Congress, there will never be a more auspicious time to repeal NFA.
One would wish. I wouldn’t hold my breath though.
Write your peeps.
and get rid of any bans on select fire
Aaaand the ATF
Just remember that if Tom ever caught Jerry, the show would be over. That’s our government.
It's now time to abolish the ATF and the NFA!
A complete overhaul would be in order! Remove FBI power to.
Would be great but I don’t think Trump is now. He’s having the director of ATF step down and appointing someone else. Someone correct me if I’m wrong
soon we have to wait for him to get in office
And the 1968 GCA
Time to recognize the 14th amendment was never ratified.
SCOTUS needs to set this straight once and for all, I'm tired of kicking the can down the road. "Shall Not Be Infringed"
Not going to happen un till you realize that all CAPITAL WORDS ARE Military II and that ONLY United States Military II Commission Laws Officers can be in that Offices;
Totally agree. The left is gaming the court on gun control using procedures. The federal court system is mired in procedure. Justice delayed is justice denied.
@@paulrodgers252 What ?
@@paulrodgers252 BS. You sound like Kommiela Harris and her word salad.
THE PEOPLE can set this straight tomorrow, sans SCOTUS if we just go ahead and ignore the unconstitutional law. We have the right, and the duty, according to the founding fathers. Nullification is the key! Then we cut out the middle man of the courts and don't have to suffer decades of lawfare tennis. "Shall not be infringed" is only misunderstood by idiots, lawyers and politicians!
All 50 state Constitutional Carry...
Carry is another subject. California is limiting us from going to the range with more than 10 round mags.... Atleast strike down these stupid regulations. and leave ccw up to the states.
@abrahammc2125 Constitutional Carry is way more important...
@@abrahammc2125ccw is unconstitutional. The 2A IS OUR PERMIT
@@bigjoesshow5648...
Amen Abraham is in a cave@@bigjoesshow5648
Hoping the Supreme Court gives a big middle-finger to CA as well
👍
It's time to clean house!!
And Washington and others
I'm hoping that Newsom is at the top of Trump's Day one deportation list.
California is going to need a lot more than the finger.
They need to address the "feature" bans in NY, CA etc...totally back door bans...absolutely "irreparable harm"
Massachusetts too
Repealing the NFA would take care of that.
I always wondered why our disabled brothers never stepped in on this one? Like a fin grip assumed you have an entire hand to hold a weapon. No vertical forgrip discriminates against those with arthritis lol. i mean damn! where yall at when we need ya!
@flysquared agreed...
@@flysquaredya & even those of us with a whole hand can barely hold onto that. 1st thing I changed out. Super dangerous if you can’t control your firearm
If someone is unable to defend themselves, due to an unconstitutional law that would seem to me to be irreperable harm.
It is more than that. When you have a constitutional right and that right is taken from you, it is irreparable. You don't need to have something bad happen where you couldn't defend yourself before you can demonstrate a harm. A right that is taken away is a harm.
This is why it is a misnomer that healthcare is a "right". We have a bunch of "lesser rights" in this country that absolutely can be taken away and they are trying to move the 2A to that category.
Show me in the 2nd Amendment where it says "arms except". I'll wait.
Exactly! Which means any and all protection tools, not just firearms but ALL arms, regardless of type or how built, shall not be infringed from keeping and bearing, which means owning or possessing, however brief, regardless of quantity, and most importantly, carrying on their person, or nearby, without restriction.
@BN-pd9tf Correct. The proper definition of arms in the context of the 2nd Amendment, when it was written, includes and is not limited to ALL items which can be used to defend one's self, property, country, or anyone or anything else which conceivably requires protection in the form of combative force, both lethal and nonlethal.
National Constitutional Carry is our legal right!
Amen to that
Absolutely, I would settle for requiring a permit with regulated standards and national reciprocity
Lawful even
Shall not be infringed period!!!!
That's my guide, not some contemporary translation.
Hopefully Trump and Republicans will end this total disregard for the Constitution!
Hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahzhzhzhzhzhzhzhzh
The hypocrisy! Trump wants to end the constitution!
Our rights are not defended by the government, it's up to us to defend them, that's what the founding father's told us. We need to learn the constitution!
Thomas Jefferson said the government's purpose is to defend our natural, G*d given rights. When it fails to do so, it is no longer legitimate.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
How right you are! We need to teach the constitution and the bill of rights in school and have a mandatory passing grade on said subjects, not have drag queen story time! All Leo's should study and pass a quiz on the constitution and the bill of rights before any employment as well. Just sayn...
Hopefully with the new red wave, that will all be possible ❤
The government does not protect rights. Our rights are protections from a tyrannical government.
How is the court so confused regarding “shall not be infringed”?
Any law restricting a lawful citizen from keeping and bearing arms should be deemed unconstitutional.
this shit is broken. irreparable harm? shouldn't matter, it's a right guaranteed in the law of the land. end of story.
I hope we can end the "high capacity" magazine bans too. I'm in Colorado and limited to 15. I'd really like to order some magazines instead of driving to Utah
In WA... limited to 10
California limited to 10.
Massachusetts limited to 10 as well. Be grateful you get 15.
10 CT. They’ll eventually push for 1. Plus no “assault weapons”, and feature bans. Olympic pistol is an assault weapon by their definitions .
hopefully yall get freedom soon im lucky that my magazine capacity is limited to my wallet
Now that Trump is in, we need to get rid of a lot of these stupid laws that are in direct violation of the 2nd amendment
Agreed
Any idea why he didn’t in his first term?
Magazine locks are dangerous and unusual
Let the Fixing begin!
Courts take too dang long. Come January all three branches need to work together and unravel every federal infringement against the 2A.
It seems to me I carried 30 round magazines the whole time I served in the Marines, well except when I carried a belt fed machine gun. They've been in "common use" since Vietnam among civilians as well. I don't need a court to know what my neighbors and the general public owns and uses. It's been fifty years and more "they've been in common use. Our forefathers used and carried the same weapons and armament as were used by the British, we threw out in our secession and establishment of our Republic. As part of the "well armed militia" I expect I'd need the equal or better arms than a "rebellious government" I would be facing. John McClain, GySgt, USMC ret.
SEMPER FI MARINE, Blessings and love to you and your family my brother in Arms.
Semper Fidelis
Gunny,...I`m glad you have an "L" in your name,...lol! My Dad was 1st Marine Division, 3rd Amphibious Force, WWII in the Pacific, a Rifleman. The finest Man I have ever known.
@@bbivens8263 those were the guys that put me in the Corps, instead of following my dad into the Navy. Great respect for your dad, I spent some time in the Pacific in my years, seen some of the islands, audacious is the word for those who landed. Thanks for the note, it's really appreciated.
If the gun is black, it is illegal to have.
" SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
If the gun is black, we must get our rights back!
Any state that passes 2a infringement laws should have their federal funding cut
The Trump administration needs to bankrupt California, Illinois, New York, and all sanctuary states and states that infringe upon our 2A rights. Get it done!
Any red state, like Kentucky, that relies on states that do have gun control for financial support, would suffer from this.😂
@FuzzyLumpkins6969 you don't understand how Federal funding works? The states have to pay the federal government but the federal government doesn't have to give them money back. By the way States like California would crap their pants if their Federal funding was cut. California now receives 99 Cents out of every dollar back from the federal government because they are so in the hole
All federal funding should be cut ASAP in every state! This would solve a lot of the control the feds are holding over the states.
Shall not be infringed
YES! This could be HUGE for Delaware. We have automatic weapons ban, suppressor ban and the 2022 "Assault Weapons Ban".
Good luck. MD has had "Assault Weapon Ban" since 2013. Been a constant fight to repeal that since. Finally Scotus is going to make a ruling on that soon though so. Fingers crossed
No more assault weapons ban No more No more
"Assault weapon" is just a political wording carry hidden agenda to illegalise them. Remember, the first thing Hitler did before he sent all the Jews to the camp was to demonize them. Same plots but just different actors now
3:40 I agree with the ,” SHALL NOT INFRINGE” verbiage 4:15
What We The People need is a way to hold politicians responsible for continually passing unconstitutional laws...
One if the best podcasts. The host explains fully the issues coming to and decisions from the Supreme Court. Also other judiciary decisions. Much appreciated as he informs without propaganda.
Yes, I agree.👍🏻
Help Illinois
Let freedom ring.🕊
Please help us 2A supporters in California
It's called..."Uhaul"
So this is shaping up to be just about the best news days ever?
Keep up the great work. 👊
Please help us in Massachusetts.
Dude, I live in MA, too. I can't see it happening... we're beyond help...
@@someonewhoknowsnothingabou2137 same here in connecticut
*Do like we do here in California and ignore all unconstitutional nonsense... like everyone here has normal mags and ARs... no backbone, no rights* 🇺🇸
All my homies hate Maura Healey
@@LexusGX460-OFF-ROADBut they’re no use if you can’t take them to a range, or use them in a self defense home invasion.
It would be cool if congress would codify our 2A rights….wait? Why are we having these discussions if our rights “shall not be infringed”?
The Democrats can't real English. They read Russian or chineese
Not infringe for well regulated militia . By zero infringement that would mean even prisoners would be able to have guns.
Trump is in homie and we gave him a full spread just be patient things will better
@@henryquackenbush8226 Well regulated meant in working order and well-armed. Not fucking banned by the government.
@@henryquackenbush8226 no becouse prisoners lose their basic citizen rights
Why doesn't the Supreme Court make a ruling stating anything infringing on our rights is illegal and not valid and whomever issues such infringements is subject to jail, fines, removal from government, etc. Honestly it is ridiculous to have to say that but the infringements are happening.
Tyrannical government. It refuses to follow its own governing principles. It picks and chooses which ones it wants to adhere to, while ignoring or diluting the content of others.
They actually have stated that any law repugnant to the constitution is void and should be disregarded maybury vs madison (1803) which means all laws that are gun control measures and gun control laws, are null and void it's just not many people have the backbone to disregard what is put in place, because if you had everybody disregarding it and then you have people getting arrested, you can turn around and sue them, and win it's just people don't have the backbone to do it. Which means we need mass noncompliance across every state and county, by every gun owner.
Thank you for all the updates all the time.
Thanks for watching!
Seriously. Real MVP
The constitution limits the government, not the people
Remember to comment. He is very smart and keeps up with everything 2A related to the US, even if it's attacks from other countries. Respect.
Shall not be infringed. Any infringement is irreparable harm.
This is the time to get rid of all these unconstitutional restrictions! 🇺🇸
SHALL NOT INFRINGE!!! Very simple and easy to understand.
THE PEOPLES RIGHTS TO BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED - 2ND AMENDMENT
People wanna argue that technology somehow has some sort of bearing on our rights! Grrrrr!!!😡😡😡
Remember that old leftist slogan, "by any means necessary"? So they'll come up with any idea they can, any argument they think might work.
They don't get that the Constitution is about human nature, not the 1700s. I mean the politicians do, but these npcs
God Bless our Constitution
Thank you, Armed Scholar! ❤😊
Thanks for bringing that to us
It’s about time something is being done about this. The state of NJ is worse.
Every second of lost rights is irreparable harm.
Thanks for keeping us up to date.
Thank you for the update.
I live in Delaware. They are in violation of many SCOTUS rulings. We need to sue the state regarding their Red Flag laws as well.
Could you make a video breaking down the "well regulated militia" phrase that is often abused by leftists? I think many viewers here would benefit from it!
THANK YOU
Greatly appreciate the work that you do!
The court needs to end these constant attacks on our rights. Period
Hopefully this will be reciprocated in NY
And Washington state
If the Constitution is the "supreme law of the land" then _“shall not be infringed”_ literally equals no laws may apply... thus rendering the idea of irreparable harm... moot. If the People wanted the 2A to be susceptible to subjective opinions and laws, then the People should use the method prescribed in the Constitution to CHANGE the 2A to include include language that could be subjectively interpreted.
It also says “a well regulated militia”
@@Googlywinker"Well regulated" for the Founders meant well trained, well lead and well equipped. Also, it explains why the keeping and bearing of arms "shall not be infringed", not a limit on the keeping and bearing there of.
@@Googlywinker - and using the language in the context of the time it was written... "militia" = the People (read Madison in Federalist 46), and "regulated" means "functioning"..... not constrained by laws.... read Federalist 46 if you want to know what the 2A is for, it's clearly explained by Madison... _the fella who wrote the 2A_ , and use Websters 1st edition dictionary for the correct context of colonial era language.
@@GooglywinkerNot only do you not realize what militia used to mean, but you haven’t read the 2nd amendment. “the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED “. Keyword “people”.
Why do the people not have a say on the ballot regarding gun bans and laws. It's the people's right, then let them vote.
It's about time!!!
They moving fast. It’s like a drain plug got pulled
Just recently started looking into 2nd amendment rights. Unfortunately I live in California and they hate 2A glad i found this channel
It infact can cause irreparable injury. The whole point of the 2nd Amendment is so that We the People can defend ourselves against a tyrant government, as well as criminals.
Thank you for all your work concerning 2nd amendment rights.
we have alot of work to do now that we won. and we need to do it before the next midterms.
Trump banned bump stocks with the ATF and helped create precedent that allowed the ATF to continue to make new "rules". I don't have a lot of faith that he will be good for the 2a
Thanks for the update, very professional.
Thanks for the update
For a “nuanced” approach read “we are going to fully go against the Constitution and will give any flimsy reason for doing so”.
Thank you for talking about the issues going on in my state!
Thank you, Anthony!
Thank you A!
Thank you for keeping us up to date?
Thank you Sir !!!
As a New Yorker we need a more pro 2A court!
Imagine telling the people with guns what they can and can't do. Now imagine those people with guns listening and obeying which is more crazy?
⛽️🚀🗽🇺🇸🙏 Pray, hope, and fight on!
Pisses me off how the US supreme court keeps bouncing cases back to the sub courts. Only to have them return to the SC
I expect reparations as a NY resident
Please keep the information and conversation going forward
Thank you for your explanation of the cases and rulings.
Thanks for what you do.
Kind Thanks for your good work, it’s much appreciated! Many Blessings! DaveyJO in Pennsylvania
Thank you for your research and passing the information along!
Thanks again Anthony.
Thank you, sir
Thank you for this concise update!
But what about bans during "states of emergency? It seems like that is their qualified immunity loophole.
Great question. 😒
That is the 500 pound gorilla in the room. It is during "states of emergency" the need for self protection becomes the most important. It is during a "state of emergency" that the resources of the police are stretched the thinnest and criminals/gangs and looters will take advantage of the citizenry. An armed citizenry is the best "militia" for backup to law enforcement. The problem here is "is the state of emergency real or imagined" (to suit the agenda of an enemy within). Taking down the power grid is a simple flip of a switch (and nearly impossible to prove - and can be blamed on hackers or an EMP riding on a Chinese balloon) a situation which would induce a "state of emergency". Highly sus. A "backdoor state of emergency" could result in the confiscation of firearms which would take forever to unravel, given the glacial speed at which our court/justice system works, and the high costs of utilizing it. Firearms in circulation are estimated to be over 500 million in the U.S. They couldn't store them in any practical way so they would have to destroy them.
Thank you very much!!!❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉😮
Have a good week
FINALLY GOOD NEWS!🙏🏻❤️🇺🇸❤️🙏🏽❤️🇺🇸❤️🙏
Good info!
Great update Anthony. Thanks
Great news for New Jersey
With Trump back, the ATF and DoJ are now under the leash
The next 4 years will be huge.
Thanks Anthony
Thank you for keeping us informed!
Thank you for keeping us informed.
Thanks for the video
Thanks Anthony!