Randolph Nesse: Are There Good Reasons For Bad Feelings? The Evolution of Mental Disorder

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 окт 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @drtevinnaidu
    @drtevinnaidu  Год назад +3

    TIMESTAMPS:
    0:00 - Introduction
    0:30 - Free Will
    10:56 - Belief in Free Will
    13:57 - Evolution of Morality
    19:40 - Kin Selection & Selfish Genes (Dawkins was right)
    24:25 - Stigma behind Evolutionary Science
    27:22 - Evolution & Religion
    30:52 - Freud & the Unconscious
    36:44 - Why does biology affect psychology?
    45:10 - Limits of the DSM & Understanding the Mind
    54:33 - Metacognition & Intuition
    59:19 - Evolutionary Psychiatry (Natural Selection & Mental Disorder)
    1:04:21 - Did Mental Illness Evolve? Good Reasons For Bad Feelings
    1:08:40 - The Smoke Detector Principle (Signal Detection Theory)
    1:13:23 - Hypophobia (not enough anxiety) & Mania
    1:26:53 - Psychosis & Paranoia
    1:30:10 - Adapting to Our Environment
    1:35:29 - Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
    1:39:33 - Addressing the Medicalization Human Experience
    1:45:35 - Psychiatry's Defense
    1:49:16 - Conclusion
    THANKS FOR WATCHING!
    If you enjoyed the content, please like this video, subscribe to the channel and turn on notifications for future updates. :)

  • @lucysweeney8347
    @lucysweeney8347 11 месяцев назад

    10 and 35 minutes in ...mentions schizophrenia.Wonderful discussion.Thank you both sincerely. Your freely sharing your insight is truly a gift to humanity and especially for carers and relatives of those too unwell to listen in themselves. Best of future luck with your work.

  • @rchocolatelover5182
    @rchocolatelover5182 9 месяцев назад +1

    I love this man

  • @MB10097
    @MB10097 11 дней назад

    One can acknowledge both the non-existence of free will AND the conundrum of holding others responsible. Maybe acknowledging there is no free will might lead to better methods in holding others responsible.

  • @MendeMaria-ej8bf
    @MendeMaria-ej8bf Год назад +1

    Robert Sapolsky thinks we don't have free will and therefore we should not judge anybody.

    • @KR-jq3mj
      @KR-jq3mj Год назад +3

      Interesting, but surely we will still need to assess which is another way of judging so we can intervene to rescue vulnerable victims. Surely he is not saying just let all behaviour go unchecked in favour of understanding. I am not sure i could just walk on by suffering just even if I did understand the causes are hormonal, genetic, or culturally determined.

    • @real_pattern
      @real_pattern Год назад +2

      do you judge a car when one of its subsystems stops working in some way, or it explodes? does it make sense to remove the car from the roads? sure, if the goal is something like minimizing harm to others. no judgement is needed, only isolation and rehabilitation & reintegration (in the case of humans), plus preventative measures.

    • @KR-jq3mj
      @KR-jq3mj Год назад +1

      @@real_pattern can't imagine how a human could live without forming an opinion..its a bizarre thought we would have to stop modelling and mentalising somehow

    • @real_pattern
      @real_pattern Год назад

      ​@@KR-jq3mjwhy? everything still happens as it does, we're just aware that we're probably not some magical freely choosing gods, but organisms who're in for a ride no-one controls.

    • @KR-jq3mj
      @KR-jq3mj 11 месяцев назад

      @@real_pattern or does it just happen as it does? Surely the role of the observer and any active inference influences what happens....after all as levins work suggests the goal orientated action in every cell acts towards that goal...but it can be diverted...interaction and the processes in between seem to shape so much that the ride involves decisions 🤔

  • @HamCubes
    @HamCubes 7 месяцев назад

    No one in ortho wonders. 🤣