🚀 Join the CompuFlair Community! 🚀 📈 Sign up on our website to access exclusive Data Science Roadmap pages - a step-by-step guide to mastering the essential skills for a successful career. 💪As a member, you’ll receive emails on expert-engineered ChatGPT prompts to boost your data science tasks, be notified of our private problem-solving sessions, and get early access to news and updates. 👉 compu-flair.com/user/register
Mixing Biological Organioid and Computer, interesting ! I've watch about AI but only few talking about Integrating Electronic interfaced with "CPU-like" Organoid Have my thumb for the Novelty 👍
I’d love to hear your perspective on Spiking Neural Networks and its possible equivalence to ising model - if we’re able to abstract the biological neuron at a decent level, Neuromorphic ASICs might start taking over taking classical ANNs. I tried to find information about critical temperature of SNNs but so far only found one study which i’m reading now. Thank you for the amazing videos and perspectives!
@@CompuFlair it’s Maximum-entropy-based metrics for quantifying critical dynamics in spiking neuron data Felipe Serafim 1, Tawan T. A. Carvalho 1,2,3, Mauro Copelli 1, and Pedro V. Carelli I’m sure you’ll extract lot more insights than me :) Thank you for your interest.
@@CompuFlair I recommend you cut down a bit on the wavy animation being applied to basically everything. if its something actively being 'used'/talked about, that's neat, but for example the title of a graphic that's gonna be unchanged for several minutes doesn't need to constantly be in motion. i get that you're going for a dynamic vibe, but the same motion being applied to all things on the screen simultaneously is a tad much. As another example, it's neat to put the animation of Von Neumann's face when he first shows up, but when it moves to the side of the screen to make room for other stuff, i would personally have gone back to the static image. Yes, he's still being talked about, but motion is best used when you want to draw the eye to that area.
@@CompuFlair I really enjoyed the main point you made in your video - it was insightful! I did want to offer a couple of suggestions for future content. Using an AI voice can sometimes deter viewers, as they might associate it with lower-quality, automatically generated content. A human voice, with its natural inflections and emotions, tends to be more engaging. Additionally, the moving titles, while adding a bit of humor, could be perceived as unprofessional by some. A simpler, more static title design might be more effective. These are just minor points, though, as the substance of your video was excellent!
![The Dark Matter of AI [Mechanistic Interpretability]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UGO_Ehywuxc/mqdefault.jpg)
🚀 Join the CompuFlair Community! 🚀
📈 Sign up on our website to access exclusive Data Science Roadmap pages - a step-by-step guide to mastering the essential skills for a successful career.
💪As a member, you’ll receive emails on expert-engineered ChatGPT prompts to boost your data science tasks, be notified of our private problem-solving sessions, and get early access to news and updates.
👉 compu-flair.com/user/register
This really blurs the line between technology and biology. Crazy stuff! What a time to be alive!
Yes, indeed!
"...It's ability to think outside the box..." - It is literally thinking Inside the box!
It's the beginnings of Super Metroid.
I wonder do the brain organoid needs sleep or rest time between training sessions
thats actually a great point. Need more experiments to figure it out
Mixing Biological Organioid and Computer, interesting !
I've watch about AI but only few talking about Integrating Electronic interfaced with "CPU-like" Organoid
Have my thumb for the Novelty 👍
I am glad you find the topic interesting.
I’d love to hear your perspective on Spiking Neural Networks and its possible equivalence to ising model - if we’re able to abstract the biological neuron at a decent level, Neuromorphic ASICs might start taking over taking classical ANNs.
I tried to find information about critical temperature of SNNs but so far only found one study which i’m reading now.
Thank you for the amazing videos and perspectives!
Thanks for the comment. Spiking neural networks are quite intriguing. I need to read more about them. What is the study you are reading?
@@CompuFlair it’s Maximum-entropy-based metrics for quantifying critical dynamics in spiking neuron data
Felipe Serafim
1, Tawan T. A. Carvalho
1,2,3, Mauro Copelli
1, and Pedro V. Carelli
I’m sure you’ll extract lot more insights than me :)
Thank you for your interest.
thanks! I'll take a look.
Has anyone considered that they may be Conscious? Hope they're enjoying their stay...
That would be interesting to know
good point but the animation is funni
Thanks for the comment. Can you explain how you would like the animation to be?
@@CompuFlair I recommend you cut down a bit on the wavy animation being applied to basically everything. if its something actively being 'used'/talked about, that's neat, but for example the title of a graphic that's gonna be unchanged for several minutes doesn't need to constantly be in motion. i get that you're going for a dynamic vibe, but the same motion being applied to all things on the screen simultaneously is a tad much.
As another example, it's neat to put the animation of Von Neumann's face when he first shows up, but when it moves to the side of the screen to make room for other stuff, i would personally have gone back to the static image. Yes, he's still being talked about, but motion is best used when you want to draw the eye to that area.
@@kylemorris5338 Thanks for the suggestions. I found them useful and will consider them in future videos.
@@CompuFlair I really enjoyed the main point you made in your video - it was insightful! I did want to offer a couple of suggestions for future content. Using an AI voice can sometimes deter viewers, as they might associate it with lower-quality, automatically generated content. A human voice, with its natural inflections and emotions, tends to be more engaging. Additionally, the moving titles, while adding a bit of humor, could be perceived as unprofessional by some. A simpler, more static title design might be more effective. These are just minor points, though, as the substance of your video was excellent!
Great! Thanks for the suggestions.
AI👍👍
I dont want this... i am okay with man made, but not betraying what God made.
Kind of same here!
God is not real
The big G isn't really all that graceful, tornados; women: spores , sex swapping frogs.
Ooooooohhhhh shiiiiiiiiit
brain cargo cult
I prefer your voice, this AI voice is difficult to follow, unnatural, great vid, companies like 3Brain are doing this kind of work
Appreciate the comment