An artist would weep at such a revelation. I studied and practiced still life and realism, my teacher was the greatest artist I’ve ever met in person… he always taught us not to capture what we think we see, but what we actually saw even if our brains were urging us not to… To realize that despite your best efforts and talents you still failed to capture a specific, beautiful, interesting feature of your subject would be crushing for a career realist.
I was invited to the premiere of this film when it came out. I got autographs from some of the actors and the director also. It was a grand party. We all got high and merry... This film was a major box office success back then and money was flowing like water. Good times!
Sorry just the part about being ‘not guilty and not mad’ after the murder ..... can someone explain? Doesn’t that mean he was right to perform the murder?
There's a thing in court where people will say that the suspected criminal is not guilty if they don't believe that the crime was done, but some will also say not guilty if they don't believe that the crime should be punished. There's lots of reasons why some don't believe that a crime should be punished, from the person being famous, to the crime being understandable. To get around this, I think there are a few who give a really light sentence instead - like what happened with Gary Plauché. One of the points that people are either executed, or put away for a long time is to remove them from society to keep the public safe. I imagine that for the case of Muybridge, people thought that he either didn't do it, or he wasn't at risk of doing it again.
@@sandwich2473 The whole temporary insanity of catching your sponse in the act of infidelity and killing one or two people had some sort of judicial term. Also the act of being drunk and killing someone with a car was considered to be manslaughter and excusable if the person paid the victims. BUT I think it had more to do with who committed the crime. Rich white male like Howard Hughes (manslaughter - drunken driving) and this person who advance technology for cinema. If his patents were available to people to reproduce and privately develop would he had been sentenced? I think Muybridge was guilty and there wasn't the in the moment temporary insanity. I think it ws a vengful, retailitory, hate crime against his abandoned wife.
The picture used at 1:31 showes a trot, not gallop as the example in Muybridge's picture. In a trot the horse stretches it's feet and all are above the ground. Would be nice to see other examples of painters perception of horse movements that got proven wrong after Muybridge's contributions. Otherwise an interesting video, thanks!
In its ignorance of a horse's gait, this video has made a mess of what in its day, was an easy to understand conundrum. Prior to this, artists/people assumed at canter and gallop the front legs stretched forward and the back legs stretched out behind the horse. These motion studies showed that not to be the case. Just look at the change in paintings prior to this period and after this discovery. The position of the legs in the trot was also in question; but should not be confused with the canter, as you have done here where you speak of the trot, yet show his pictures of a horse in the canter. In the age of Google, there really is no excuse for a person making an informative video to actually do their homework. It smacks of laziness that someone would not actually study the problems Eadweard Muybridge was attempting to solve, before making a video on the subject. To do justice to him, you needed to understand how horses actually move, and how they were, at the time; perceived to move. In this you failed. Something to improve upon? You also failed to mention the significance of the stagecoach accident he survived. It had a dramatic effect on the remainder of his life. It was the basis of his murder defence, yet you seemed to make light of this fact. He suffered an injury that today, is still largely untreatable. Such damage to the brain can result in marked changes to the focus and personality of a person. He is reported to have changed from a dapper gentleman, to more of a scruffy, driven individual. Perhaps, were it not for his accident, his interest in photography would not have led him down the same path? Otherwise, a reasonable, short history, that may lead others to seek a fuller version of his story and contributions to cinema. Thanks.
Of course, something of historical importance was left out of this video. Muybridge was abused and destroyed by the money man Leland Stanford, just as other great inventors were: Nicola Tesla, Herman Hollerith, and George Ritchey, for example.
@@claribeltimmins6164 Its more like Leland took credit of his The horse in motion work by writing a book that credited him like shit by saying that Muybridge was one of his workers, that was until he made more photographs and people realized he was the one who actually did the experiments.
probably the first "live action" one at least. I know there were lots of contraptions like zoetropes invented in 1834, which were comprised of illustrations. they did not use film or photography though. this all I guess would depend on one's specific definition of a "movie"
Yes, it's always a matter of definition with these things. One major reason why a lot of people don't consider these the first true motion pictures is that they weren't recorded in a single camera, but a separate camera for each frame. So a more common answer is Le Prince's work from around 1887. He used one camera, first with one lens per recorded frame, later a "proper" single-lens camera.
Sunday 25 February 2024, was ‘match play’ (Men’s Event) arranged for Mrs. 🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐, to Tell Him (Album: Tell Him, Artist: The Exciters; The Burning Bed (TV Movie 1984) - Soundtracks) the truth about What the Netherlands Mean to Australia (by A Lodewyckx · 1943), and THE IRISH IN AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED STATES (by DN DOYLE · 1989 · Cited by 19 )? Two days before 1888 CHOP HOUSE (405 Spray Ave, Banff, AB T1L 1J4, Canada) reimagines what happened “In West Orange, New Jersey, when Thomas Edison meets with Eadweard Muybridge, who proposes a scheme for sound film” (Beguiling Hollywood January 29, 2014; Wikipedia)… Man to Man (Albert R Lyman, 1962), “This show chronicles the lives, loves, happiness, and heartbreaks of the residents of Summer Bay, a small coastal town on the upper Northern Beaches of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia” (Home and Away First episode date: January 18, 1988, Created by: Alan Bateman, Ending theme: "Home and Away"; (international broadcasts), Executive producers: John Holmes; Julie McGauran, Network: Seven Network, Production location: Palm Beach, Sydney, New South Wales). As The FIH-PRO-LEAGUE Field Hockey Tournament of Champions continues 🎖🏆🏅🥇🥈🥉 🏑🏑🏑 m.imdb.com/title/tt0094481/ www.google.com/amp/s/vickielester.com/2014/01/29/eadweard-muybridge-one-of-the-fathers-of-the-motion-picture/amp/ www.jstor.org/stable/20631123 www.jstor.org/stable/24337417 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1888 www.1888chophouse.com/?+Maps&+maps&+maps&y_source=1_MTU2Mzc2MDktNzE1LWxvY2F0aW9uLndlYnNpdGU%3D genius.com/The-exciters-tell-him-lyrics m.imdb.com/title/tt0087010/soundtrack/
An artist would weep at such a revelation. I studied and practiced still life and realism, my teacher was the greatest artist I’ve ever met in person… he always taught us not to capture what we think we see, but what we actually saw even if our brains were urging us not to…
To realize that despite your best efforts and talents you still failed to capture a specific, beautiful, interesting feature of your subject would be crushing for a career realist.
Well said.
@@drinascita thank you 😊
Fantastic summary of this interesting historical character! I've been looking for a short film to summarize him for my students. Thank you!
Hi Jonathan, this film might be of use for you too: vimeo.com/13883000
I was invited to the premiere of this film when it came out. I got autographs from some of the actors and the director also. It was a grand party. We all got high and merry... This film was a major box office success back then and money was flowing like water. Good times!
You really think someone would do that? Just go on the Internet and tell lies?
@@RUclips.Commen-tater Relax, they're just having fun. Sheesh.
I'm hear Because of Nope
Here
Muybridge is the only truly inventor of animation!
This stunning work, thank you from a homeschool group.
0:02 / 3:51
Slices of Time: Eadweard Muybridge’s Cinematic Legacy....................best post...........thank you
Beautifully done!
This is incredible!
Sorry just the part about being ‘not guilty and not mad’ after the murder ..... can someone explain? Doesn’t that mean he was right to perform the murder?
There's a thing in court where people will say that the suspected criminal is not guilty if they don't believe that the crime was done, but some will also say not guilty if they don't believe that the crime should be punished.
There's lots of reasons why some don't believe that a crime should be punished, from the person being famous, to the crime being understandable.
To get around this, I think there are a few who give a really light sentence instead - like what happened with Gary Plauché.
One of the points that people are either executed, or put away for a long time is to remove them from society to keep the public safe. I imagine that for the case of Muybridge, people thought that he either didn't do it, or he wasn't at risk of doing it again.
@@sandwich2473 The whole temporary insanity of catching your sponse in the act of infidelity and killing one or two people had some sort of judicial term. Also the act of being drunk and killing someone with a car was considered to be manslaughter and excusable if the person paid the victims. BUT I think it had more to do with who committed the crime. Rich white male like Howard Hughes (manslaughter - drunken driving) and this person who advance technology for cinema. If his patents were available to people to reproduce and privately develop would he had been sentenced? I think Muybridge was guilty and there wasn't the in the moment temporary insanity. I think it ws a vengful, retailitory, hate crime against his abandoned wife.
Nope should have been nominated for Oscars. And won for Best Cinematography and that they paid an homage to him in their speech
2:13
Not only a precursor to cinema, but also rotoscoping
Do you know about Horse breeder Standford
Wow! I also like the font that s at the beginning of the video! May I know the name of that please?
The picture used at 1:31 showes a trot, not gallop as the example in Muybridge's picture. In a trot the horse stretches it's feet and all are above the ground. Would be nice to see other examples of painters perception of horse movements that got proven wrong after Muybridge's contributions. Otherwise an interesting video, thanks!
It's a gallop, not a trot.
Who's the Jockey on the horse
Suspicious
Awesome!
Nice animation! 🙂
What type of camera did he use when capturing the horse?
A cannon duh
That would be plural (cameras.) And there were many of them.
Here from nope
In its ignorance of a horse's gait, this video has made a mess of what in its day, was an easy to understand conundrum.
Prior to this, artists/people assumed at canter and gallop the front legs stretched forward and the back legs stretched out behind the horse. These motion studies showed that not to be the case. Just look at the change in paintings prior to this period and after this discovery. The position of the legs in the trot was also in question; but should not be confused with the canter, as you have done here where you speak of the trot, yet show his pictures of a horse in the canter.
In the age of Google, there really is no excuse for a person making an informative video to actually do their homework. It smacks of laziness that someone would not actually study the problems Eadweard Muybridge was attempting to solve, before making a video on the subject. To do justice to him, you needed to understand how horses actually move, and how they were, at the time; perceived to move. In this you failed. Something to improve upon?
You also failed to mention the significance of the stagecoach accident he survived. It had a dramatic effect on the remainder of his life. It was the basis of his murder defence, yet you seemed to make light of this fact. He suffered an injury that today, is still largely untreatable. Such damage to the brain can result in marked changes to the focus and personality of a person. He is reported to have changed from a dapper gentleman, to more of a scruffy, driven individual. Perhaps, were it not for his accident, his interest in photography would not have led him down the same path?
Otherwise, a reasonable, short history, that may lead others to seek a fuller version of his story and contributions to cinema. Thanks.
Make your own video then.
The narrator didn't say trot
Thank you. That was driving me nuts. Gallop. Horse was photographed at a gallop!!!!
❤
Gigachad
wow
Of course, something of historical importance was left out of this video. Muybridge was abused and destroyed by the money man Leland Stanford, just as other great inventors were: Nicola Tesla, Herman Hollerith, and George Ritchey, for example.
Where can I find this info?
@@claribeltimmins6164 Its more like Leland took credit of his The horse in motion work by writing a book that credited him like shit by saying that Muybridge was one of his workers, that was until he made more photographs and people realized he was the one who actually did the experiments.
Don't forget about including Philo Farnsworth and Preston Tucker in your list
So this movie would be the first movie ever right
probably the first "live action" one at least. I know there were lots of contraptions like zoetropes invented in 1834, which were comprised of illustrations. they did not use film or photography though. this all I guess would depend on one's specific definition of a "movie"
Yes, it's always a matter of definition with these things. One major reason why a lot of people don't consider these the first true motion pictures is that they weren't recorded in a single camera, but a separate camera for each frame. So a more common answer is Le Prince's work from around 1887. He used one camera, first with one lens per recorded frame, later a "proper" single-lens camera.
Sunday 25 February 2024, was ‘match play’ (Men’s Event) arranged for Mrs. 🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐, to Tell Him (Album: Tell Him, Artist: The Exciters; The Burning Bed (TV Movie 1984) - Soundtracks) the truth about What the Netherlands Mean to Australia (by A Lodewyckx · 1943), and THE IRISH IN AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED STATES (by DN DOYLE · 1989 · Cited by 19 )? Two days before 1888 CHOP HOUSE (405 Spray Ave, Banff, AB T1L 1J4, Canada) reimagines what happened “In West Orange, New Jersey, when Thomas Edison meets with Eadweard Muybridge, who proposes a scheme for sound film” (Beguiling Hollywood January 29, 2014; Wikipedia)…
Man to Man (Albert R Lyman, 1962), “This show chronicles the lives, loves, happiness, and heartbreaks of the residents of Summer Bay, a small coastal town on the upper Northern Beaches of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia” (Home and Away First episode date: January 18, 1988, Created by: Alan Bateman, Ending theme: "Home and Away"; (international broadcasts), Executive producers: John Holmes; Julie McGauran, Network: Seven Network, Production location: Palm Beach, Sydney, New South Wales). As The FIH-PRO-LEAGUE Field Hockey Tournament of Champions continues 🎖🏆🏅🥇🥈🥉 🏑🏑🏑
m.imdb.com/title/tt0094481/
www.google.com/amp/s/vickielester.com/2014/01/29/eadweard-muybridge-one-of-the-fathers-of-the-motion-picture/amp/
www.jstor.org/stable/20631123
www.jstor.org/stable/24337417
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1888
www.1888chophouse.com/?+Maps&+maps&+maps&y_source=1_MTU2Mzc2MDktNzE1LWxvY2F0aW9uLndlYnNpdGU%3D
genius.com/The-exciters-tell-him-lyrics
m.imdb.com/title/tt0087010/soundtrack/
First movie my ass!!!!
movies and animation wouldn't be here today if they put him guilty lmao
NOPE brought me here
Was this flimed ona potatoe 💀
what💀
This is sickening! It's similiar to the santa clause story!!
THE SHITTY ASS MOVIE NOPE SENT ME HERE 🗑