So I got here because I had a very good landscape workflow up to about 4 years ago. I have not use photoshop at all since then. I opened it recently and did not really recognize anything. So I am here to relearn and this was a big help and relief. Many thing have not changed and the NIK filters were my work horse. Glad they are still here. Just subbed and looking to Greg to get me back to speed. Thanks Greg.
Thank you so much for your help. I tried some of these tricks but somehow I was lost in this process.. this complete session show me the correct way to do that . Namaskar Love from INDIA
Select Subject gives a hard selection of the buildings, with a lot of gaps. The result would be a very bad mask. I also tried Select Subject, but it also doesn't work. "Select Sky" has a large feather that goes very far into the building here. So that would destroy a lot of detail in the buildings in this case.
I had the same thought and tried it, but it doesn't work. "Select Sky" has a large feather that goes very far into the building here. So that would destroy a lot of detail in the buildings in this case.
Ultimately, the general workflow is the main thing I wanted to convey, as there are also images with water or other non-sky elements that should be in one mask and not the other. But even in what seems like a slam dunk, "select sky" wouldn't work well here. You could use a quick select and do some refinement on it, but it would have been a bit more work here.
It’s really not meant as a luminosity mask tutorial, I do a lot of videos without them and just advocate using them where they help. There are definitely other cases where a hand painted mask or such might work great with this technique.
At first I thought: why don’t you shorten the title of the vid to “I found the holy grail “ (in post processing). But this time I got to say: isn’t that basically what has been going around the Net for years as selective sharpening? Only in this case aided by lum masking? Though in this case I would think PS “select sky” may have been sufficient. Though Thank you for the video even if I thought I finally would know what the grail looks like … P.s. additionally you can also use this principle to guide the viewers eye… just (extra) sharpen the part of the image you want the viewer to look at and optionally apply noise reduction to the once you do not.
So I got here because I had a very good landscape workflow up to about 4 years ago. I have not use photoshop at all since then. I opened it recently and did not really recognize anything. So I am here to relearn and this was a big help and relief. Many thing have not changed and the NIK filters were my work horse. Glad they are still here. Just subbed and looking to Greg to get me back to speed. Thanks Greg.
Glad that was helpful!
This is really great tutorial, helped a lot with an image I've been working on
Awesome tutorial, thank you for sharing Greg..
great tutorial Greg and some great information about masking differences that is worth remembering and practicing.
Excellent!
Thank you so much for your help. I tried some of these tricks but somehow I was lost in this process.. this complete session show me the correct way to do that . Namaskar Love from INDIA
Another excellent video tutorial. Thank you so much for taking the time to put these together. They are indeed very very helpful!
Glad to hear it, thanks!
Excellent one! many thanks
Very informative tutorial Greg, enjoyed this very much
Thank you
Great video...extremely helpful. I found the filter mask vs layer mask to be confusing, but that's on me, not you. Thanks for putting this together.
Fantastic! Thanks, Greg.
Thank you
Man RUclips’s compression make the sedulity of the detail hard to see.
Typically, unfortunately. Can try to force the resolution and try to pause to buffer for best quality
Greg, A very interesting video thanks!
Fantastic.
For this particular photo why didn’t you just use select subject to create the mask and then choose invert?
Select Subject gives a hard selection of the buildings, with a lot of gaps. The result would be a very bad mask.
I also tried Select Subject, but it also doesn't work. "Select Sky" has a large feather that goes very far into the building here. So that would destroy a lot of detail in the buildings in this case.
This guys a freaking genius lol
Great video
Or, select sky?
I had the same thought and tried it, but it doesn't work. "Select Sky" has a large feather that goes very far into the building here. So that would destroy a lot of detail in the buildings in this case.
Ultimately, the general workflow is the main thing I wanted to convey, as there are also images with water or other non-sky elements that should be in one mask and not the other. But even in what seems like a slam dunk, "select sky" wouldn't work well here. You could use a quick select and do some refinement on it, but it would have been a bit more work here.
I might have known you'd try that 1st & I know it's a luminosity mask tutorial anyway but thought I'd mention it, just in case
It’s really not meant as a luminosity mask tutorial, I do a lot of videos without them and just advocate using them where they help. There are definitely other cases where a hand painted mask or such might work great with this technique.
At first I thought: why don’t you shorten the title of the vid to “I found the holy grail “ (in post processing).
But this time I got to say: isn’t that basically what has been going around the Net for years as selective sharpening? Only in this case aided by lum masking?
Though in this case I would think PS “select sky” may have been sufficient.
Though Thank you for the video even if I thought I finally would know what the grail looks like …
P.s. additionally you can also use this principle to guide the viewers eye… just (extra) sharpen the part of the image you want the viewer to look at and optionally apply noise reduction to the once you do not.
Select sky includes a lot of the buildings here, wouldn’t give you what you’d want