It's nice to hear someone explain something very technical in short concise statements with very good elocution and accompanying visuals. Very nice presentation. I had a general idea of most of this but now feel better informed on several points especially on the asymmetry as it relates to the perihelion and aphelion .
Only 10k views and 478 likes after 3 years? Are people lacking interest in astrophysics and natural sciences in general that much? This channel deserves a whole lot more attention, especially because of its pleasant appearance and educational value for non-scientists with a healthy interest in natural sciences. I'm happy I found this channel.
This is the best explanation of the analemma I have found. You have a great teaching style and your passion for astronomy comes through. Why aren't you producing anymore? You're a natural. No ka oi, man!
@@spacemansteve8690 This is probably the best explanation for the analima I have ever heard. Would it be possible for me to mirror this on my channel to help a few flat earthers and possibly send you a few subscribers?
@@Earthislife1031 earth is flat , prove me wrong, research flat earth, then you will see the indoctrination you have been put under by spellcasters like him and NASA
7:53 why is there a 8-shape if there is a circular orbit? What causes the east-west fluctuation? Should it not be just a line north-south and therefore perpendicular to the line in the following case of no tilt and elliptical orbit what causes a line east-west?
The tilt is what creates the width in the case I highlight -- indeed if a planet had an elliptical orbit and no tilt, you would see an east-west line throughout the year -- but the tilt actually factors into the "equation of time" (the difference between "local solar time" and "local mean time") and contributes to the variation in the length of a solar day through the year. This variation in day length due to our tilt is what would cause the figure 8 shape. You're right though, that the tilt would need to be very significant for us to see this effect - I probably exaggerated it in the cartoon figure!
@@spacemansteve8690 Thanks for the answer. I understand now that the tilt is the reason for the 8-shape in this case and also for the 8-shape of the analemma. And the Keppler rule just makes the northern part of the 8-shape a bit smaller in the width.
This is a great presentation. A couple points: at 8:20 you state the shape of Mars' analemma vs Earth's is due to the difference in perihelion location relative to the solstices. This could be considered true since changing that relationship on Mars could create a figure 8, but Mars' orbit is slightly MORE eccentric than Earth's which also accounts for the change in shape. In other words, making Earth's orbit more eccentric to match Mars' gives us a similar looking teardrop albeit not as skewed as on Mars (the skewing being from what you say). Also, as the equinoxes precess on Earth, the shape will change but I believe will always remain a figure 8. I'm saying these things based on an online analemma generator which I'll link to below.
I would love to know why the analemma is a perfect figure eight under the conditions of significant tilt and circular orbit. Essentially, why is it not just a line? Is this the effect on speed by the perihelion and aphelion?
The tilt is what creates the width in the case I highlight -- indeed if a planet had an elliptical orbit and no tilt, you would see an east-west line throughout the year -- but the tilt actually factors into the "equation of time" (the difference between "local solar time" and "local mean time") and contributes to the variation in the length of a solar day through the year. This variation in day length due to our tilt is what would cause the figure 8 shape. You're right though, that the tilt would need to be very significant for us to see this effect - I probably exaggerated it in the cartoon figure!
It just makes a circle because the Sun circles above us.. The earth isn't a stupid globe with all the bullshit you say! This Analemma clearly shows a Circle, one motion 😆 not four 🙄.. We are stationary just how it seems and the Sun and moon circle us and above them is the zodiac/stars!
During solstices Earth axis of rotation is perpendicular to its orbital plane as viewed from the Sun. During equinoxes it is tilted 23.5 degrees. During solstices Earth needs to rotate more to position the same meridian under the Sun and thus complete solar day than during the equinoxes. To visualize this draw the right triangle formed between earth’s orbital plane, axis of rotation and direction of rotation. Since Earth moves around the Sun in orbital plane direction which can be represented by hypotenuse of the triangle, but rotates on the rotation direction which is shorter than the hypotenuse orbital direction side, the Earth needs to rotate less the closer it is to equinoxes to complete solar day. This causes solar noon to drift right during solstices (longer solar day than 24 hrs) and left during equinoxes (shorter solar day than 24 hrs). Orbital eccentricity combines with this effect to make analemma non symmetrical.
Hey I'm doing a video about the sun, architecture and sustainable design, I'm trying to explain it in as simple a way as possible, hope you don't mind if I "borrow" some of your tactics. I'll also try and reference you (I'm still figuring this out, I'm kind of new in this space). Thanks for your work and good vibe. Keep it up!
This is probably the best explanation for the analima I have ever heard. Would it be possible for me to mirror this on my channel and possibly send you a few subscribers?
Thank you very much, I'm glad you enjoyed it! The image of the Martian analemma is a simulation that shows the late afternoon Sun that would have been seen from the Sagan Memorial Station once every 30 Martian days (sols) beginning on Sol 24 (July 29, 1997)
So wait... If I get this right, this happens because our clocks aren't calibrated to correct for the orbital speed at any given moment, right? As in, It's not that the actual zenith moves left and right, but rather it happens because our clocks are engineered to keep an arbitrary full number, instead of showing when the sun is in the actual zenith? So when you take a photo at noon, you aren't _actually_ taking a photo at "noon" understood as "Sun being in its highest point", but rather you take it at "noon", understood as "12th o'clock"? Or is there some other mechanic that I am missing?
Our clocks represent an average solar time, not the actual solar time. That's a convenience decision, to make time management practical for us humans. If our clocks would miraculously be able to recalibrate for the true solar day, every day again (or, actually for every moment), our days would not be a constant 24 hours anymore. The Sun would then appear at an analemma that would be a straight line (matching twice the Earth's tilt angle), not in an 8-shape anymore. The angle of the analemma depends on the latitude of the location on Earth: horizontal at the equator, vertical at the Poles, and some angle at any other latitude.
Nice job, thank you. It is my understanding that if you live between the Tropics there are two days of the year when the sun is directly overhead at your location. True? If so, is there a formula or chart we can use? I live at 42.9634° N............ Thank you !!!
I actually have a video all about this! Here in Hawai`i it is called "Lahaina Noon": ruclips.net/video/UTQILfgWN60/видео.html -- I also found this website helpful for calculations: earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/9050/what-time-and-date-is-the-sun-directly-overhead-a-given-place-on-earth
Axial tilt. During the solstices Earth axis of rotation is perpendicular to its orbital plane as viewed from the Sun. During the equinoxes it is tilted 23.5 degrees. During the solstices Earth needs to rotate more to position the same meridian under the Sun and thus complete a solar day than during the equinoxes. To visualize this, draw the right triangle formed between the earth’s orbital plane, axis of rotation and direction of rotation. Since Earth moves around the Sun in orbital plane direction which can be represented by hypotenuse of the triangle, but rotates on the rotation direction which is shorter than the hypotenuse orbital direction side, the Earth needs to rotate less the closer it is to equinoxes to complete solar day. This causes solar noon to drift right during solstices (longer solar day than 24 hrs) and left during equinoxes (shorter solar day than 24 hrs). Orbital eccentricity combines with this effect to make analemma non symmetrical.
Если наблюдать за луной с точки(Широта: 46°20′58″ с.ш. Долгота: 48°02′26″ в.д. ) 23 октября 2022г то будет виден старый месяц перед восходом солнца ( то есть луна будет освещена с востока на запад) а 27 октября 2022г будет виден новый месяц после захода солнца то есть луна будет освещена с запада на восток то есть с противоположного направления) а 25 октября луна будет двигаться с востока на запад со скоростью примерно 3475 км за *60*минут и будет наблюдаться солнечное затмение. Кто сможет ответить на вопрос : Как солнце за три дня перемещается примерно на 180 градусов освещая луну то востока на запад то запада на восток?
A bit of a qustion If one of the things that make the solar analemma is the movement of the earth around the sphere make it look like that Then why would the moon analemma is similar to the sun all tho for the moon it dosent have the movment of the earth around the sun as something that impact it analemma(i think) ? Shouldn't the moon analemma look different as it dose not have that factor to it I tried to answer it myself and what i got is the movement of the moon around the earth throughout the month is really similar to the earth movement around the sun throughout the year that it make it look similar But i want a confirmation from someone that have more knowledge on the subject to go with if you put an explanation it will help too
A person takes a photo everyday of the sun at the same exact time?..So these analemma pictures are an accumulation of 365 pictures?! Just trying to understand the process a little more basically trying to understand why there are only a couple dozen “sun dots” if the pictures are taken over 365 days
Bravo. I still have questions, but I always have questions, (my need to know the intracacies and details), but this is the clearest, somehow relatable , explanation to date. There's so much more to the earth, its movement, its gravity, its atmosphere, its tilt, spin, revolution, its moon. If people only realized how amazing, unique, majestic to be living on Planet Earth..... The analemma, like you said flat out, in the very beginning, this is one of the ridiculous natural fascinations that occurs in plain sight. Absolutely off the hook. It's intensity is like that of a total solar eclipse, or annular solar eclipse, and maybe even to that of a tsunami (2004); or how most maps of the solar system do not show relative size of the planets vs the sun, however, one is thus unprepared and bewildered when seeing at a later time the map or picture of the sun up against the planets (relative size) The size of the sun is fricken scary ss hell. Even the ancients figured it out, thus labelling the sun their god. By the way, are you the photographer who created the analemma and eclipse pic? From an observatory?
7:17 there is no way this angle is 23.5º, more like 45º 3:07 the angle of the analemma does change with the latitude, but it also changes with the specific times of the day you decide to photograph it. Doesn't it?
So, the Earth doesn't revolve 'Around' the Sun? Ignoring the fact that the Sun is hurtling through space, these photos reveal that the Earth never is abreast of the Sun but, is always, beneath the Sun's north/south orientation. Which causes me to question if, as the Sun is hurtling through space, is the Earth corkscrewing a path around but rearward of the Sun's path? Are all the planets trailing the Sun?
Steve: you seem intelligent. Take a telephoto lens, go at sea level and take a picture of a boat at 40 km. Apply trigonometry based on Earth radius. Not enough for you? Buy an infrared filter and take a picture from a high point. The greeks had the response right, this is our electromagnetic support, the 8 shape is our greater realm wobbling on the support…
Keep in mind that the analemma above our beautiful non rotating flat earth requires a stationary star (Polaris) check out the antikithera mechanism AKA flat earth working model.
Why should anybody, especially an astronomer, research this delusional nonsense? Please do some serious research yourself and get some reasonable knowledge about the universe.
@@Tanaquil_de_Lammerfors observing things from a distance isn't knowledge. no one truly knows anything about the universe, and it's impossible to! flat or globe. how are there only 40 to 50 countable sun dots in the analemma if it's a single photo taken over 365 days?
@@h-dawg6462 So, when you are standing at a harbour and are watching an incoming ship in the distance, you don´t know anything about this ship or maybe you even don´t believe, that it really exists, until it moored and you are able to enter the deck? And it is impossible to get any knowledge about a mountain or a building or a big tree in the distance just by observing them? Sounds to me like a very limited mindset. Observing things leads to knowledge. And any progress in the observation, for example enabled by better equipment, leads to extended knowledge. That´s how science works. Concerning the analemma, Spaceman Steve made a little mistake. Yes, a real analemma consists per definition of photos of the sun, taken from the exact same place at the exact same time on every day of a year, combined in a photographical overlay. It therefore has to show 365 or 366 suns, forming the shape of an 8. But often, analemmas just contain 40 to 50 different photos, for example one photo a week, like the ones in the video. Maybe it´s for a better visibility of the single sun dot, that are nevertheless forming an 8. I don´t know, but that´s no reason to ignore the scientifical relevance of analemmas in general. But some people are not able to see, some people do not want to see.
T I L T is the answer for every un-answerable question. The speed changes according to the position with the sun, but you don't feel it, because of its uniform motion. Suppose you are in a car, you don't feel any shit. Yes, SCIENCE is a mystery.
If you watch through the end of the video - you'll see how the analemma changes depending on planetary tilt and the amount an orbit of a planet is "squished" (using Mars as an example) -- indeed it is our tilted sphere and our orbit around the sun that precisely allow an analemma to exist :)
The sun is obviously moving... There is no orbit. Because if that were true then the entirety of our orbits would be constantly and dependantly in that analemma. How would the earths rotation be able to fit the Polaris north star ? I say no to globe.
This guy’s gotta be a closet flerfer. Which is good, because space is fake and gay, and earth is the undeniably measured flat! No one has ever been in a second law of thermodynamics violation, i.e., a space vacuum
Wow...your videos providing lot more knowledge than a textbook. Sad to see only few views and likes. But you please keep making videos like this. Thanks for the content. 🫶🤩
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
It's nice to hear someone explain something very technical in short concise statements with very good elocution and accompanying visuals. Very nice presentation. I had a general idea of most of this but now feel better informed on several points especially on the asymmetry as it relates to the perihelion and aphelion .
Thank you for the kind feedback -- I'm glad it was helpful!
Only 10k views and 478 likes after 3 years? Are people lacking interest in astrophysics and natural sciences in general that much? This channel deserves a whole lot more attention, especially because of its pleasant appearance and educational value for non-scientists with a healthy interest in natural sciences. I'm happy I found this channel.
You’ve just explained this in 9 minutes, better than our teacher had in one hour😁.
Ha! Well I'm glad I could help - but sorry to hear about your class!
Keep in mind that we are one beautiful family on a non rotating flat earth ❤️ the spinning ball lost in a vacuum is a conspiracy
This is the best explanation of the analemma I have found. You have a great teaching style and your passion for astronomy comes through. Why aren't you producing anymore? You're a natural.
No ka oi, man!
Easy follow Spaceman!
Thank you!
Cool video Spaceman Steve! Well done, I enjoyed it and you explained everything really well!
Thanks a ton! I really appreciate the encouragement :)
@@spacemansteve8690 This is probably the best explanation for the analima I have ever heard. Would it be possible for me to mirror this on my channel to help a few flat earthers and possibly send you a few subscribers?
@@Earthislife1031 earth is flat , prove me wrong, research flat earth, then you will see the indoctrination you have been put under by spellcasters like him and NASA
This was so good! New fan here.
7:53 why is there a 8-shape if there is a circular orbit? What causes the east-west fluctuation? Should it not be just a line north-south and therefore perpendicular to the line in the following case of no tilt and elliptical orbit what causes a line east-west?
The tilt is what creates the width in the case I highlight -- indeed if a planet had an elliptical orbit and no tilt, you would see an east-west line throughout the year -- but the tilt actually factors into the "equation of time" (the difference between "local solar time" and "local mean time") and contributes to the variation in the length of a solar day through the year. This variation in day length due to our tilt is what would cause the figure 8 shape. You're right though, that the tilt would need to be very significant for us to see this effect - I probably exaggerated it in the cartoon figure!
@@spacemansteve8690 Thanks for the answer. I understand now that the tilt is the reason for the 8-shape in this case and also for the 8-shape of the analemma. And the Keppler rule just makes the northern part of the 8-shape a bit smaller in the width.
You should have many more followers! This was a great break down! Thanks 😀
Thank you very much!
just subscried!! amazing explanation!!
Thank you!
Found this video really interesting, thank you :)
I love your videos, I wish you would post more!
This is a great presentation.
A couple points: at 8:20 you state the shape of Mars' analemma vs Earth's is due to the difference in perihelion location relative to the solstices. This could be considered true since changing that relationship on Mars could create a figure 8, but Mars' orbit is slightly MORE eccentric than Earth's which also accounts for the change in shape. In other words, making Earth's orbit more eccentric to match Mars' gives us a similar looking teardrop albeit not as skewed as on Mars (the skewing being from what you say).
Also, as the equinoxes precess on Earth, the shape will change but I believe will always remain a figure 8. I'm saying these things based on an online analemma generator which I'll link to below.
Great video!
Thanķ you so much for your explanation!!!
Mahalo for this video! 👏🏽
I would love to know why the analemma is a perfect figure eight under the conditions of significant tilt and circular orbit. Essentially, why is it not just a line? Is this the effect on speed by the perihelion and aphelion?
The tilt is what creates the width in the case I highlight -- indeed if a planet had an elliptical orbit and no tilt, you would see an east-west line throughout the year -- but the tilt actually factors into the "equation of time" (the difference between "local solar time" and "local mean time") and contributes to the variation in the length of a solar day through the year. This variation in day length due to our tilt is what would cause the figure 8 shape. You're right though, that the tilt would need to be very significant for us to see this effect - I probably exaggerated it in the cartoon figure!
It just makes a circle because the Sun circles above us.. The earth isn't a stupid globe with all the bullshit you say! This Analemma clearly shows a Circle, one motion 😆 not four 🙄.. We are stationary just how it seems and the Sun and moon circle us and above them is the zodiac/stars!
During solstices Earth axis of rotation is perpendicular to its orbital plane as viewed from the Sun. During equinoxes it is tilted 23.5 degrees. During solstices Earth needs to rotate more to position the same meridian under the Sun and thus complete solar day than during the equinoxes. To visualize this draw the right triangle formed between earth’s orbital plane, axis of rotation and direction of rotation. Since Earth moves around the Sun in orbital plane direction which can be represented by hypotenuse of the triangle, but rotates on the rotation direction which is shorter than the hypotenuse orbital direction side, the Earth needs to rotate less the closer it is to equinoxes to complete solar day. This causes solar noon to drift right during solstices (longer solar day than 24 hrs) and left during equinoxes (shorter solar day than 24 hrs). Orbital eccentricity combines with this effect to make analemma non symmetrical.
Making mine was very challenging indeed, but steve liked it on Facebook 😂
Hey I'm doing a video about the sun, architecture and sustainable design, I'm trying to explain it in as simple a way as possible, hope you don't mind if I "borrow" some of your tactics. I'll also try and reference you (I'm still figuring this out, I'm kind of new in this space). Thanks for your work and good vibe. Keep it up!
Your January 1st looks a lot different than my January 1st.
This is probably the best explanation for the analima I have ever heard. Would it be possible for me to mirror this on my channel and possibly send you a few subscribers?
Tutu Lemma!
_Fantastic_ explanation! Was the analemma on Mars real?
Thank you very much, I'm glad you enjoyed it! The image of the Martian analemma is a simulation that shows the late afternoon Sun that would have been seen from the Sagan Memorial Station once every 30 Martian days (sols) beginning on Sol 24 (July 29, 1997)
So wait... If I get this right, this happens because our clocks aren't calibrated to correct for the orbital speed at any given moment, right? As in, It's not that the actual zenith moves left and right, but rather it happens because our clocks are engineered to keep an arbitrary full number, instead of showing when the sun is in the actual zenith? So when you take a photo at noon, you aren't _actually_ taking a photo at "noon" understood as "Sun being in its highest point", but rather you take it at "noon", understood as "12th o'clock"?
Or is there some other mechanic that I am missing?
also curious about this. did you figure it out?
That's about it.
Our clocks represent an average solar time, not the actual solar time. That's a convenience decision, to make time management practical for us humans. If our clocks would miraculously be able to recalibrate for the true solar day, every day again (or, actually for every moment), our days would not be a constant 24 hours anymore. The Sun would then appear at an analemma that would be a straight line (matching twice the Earth's tilt angle), not in an 8-shape anymore. The angle of the analemma depends on the latitude of the location on Earth: horizontal at the equator, vertical at the Poles, and some angle at any other latitude.
Nice job, thank you. It is my understanding that if you live between the Tropics there are two days of the year when the sun is directly overhead at your location. True? If so, is there a formula or chart we can use? I live at 42.9634° N............ Thank you !!!
I actually have a video all about this! Here in Hawai`i it is called "Lahaina Noon": ruclips.net/video/UTQILfgWN60/видео.html -- I also found this website helpful for calculations: earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/9050/what-time-and-date-is-the-sun-directly-overhead-a-given-place-on-earth
I cant get the point ....... Please explainn...
But what causes the horizontal movement for a perfectly circular orbit since there is no variation in velocity
Axial tilt. During the solstices Earth axis of rotation is perpendicular to its orbital plane as viewed from the Sun. During the equinoxes it is tilted 23.5 degrees. During the solstices Earth needs to rotate more to position the same meridian under the Sun and thus complete a solar day than during the equinoxes. To visualize this, draw the right triangle formed between the earth’s orbital plane, axis of rotation and direction of rotation. Since Earth moves around the Sun in orbital plane direction which can be represented by hypotenuse of the triangle, but rotates on the rotation direction which is shorter than the hypotenuse orbital direction side, the Earth needs to rotate less the closer it is to equinoxes to complete solar day. This causes solar noon to drift right during solstices (longer solar day than 24 hrs) and left during equinoxes (shorter solar day than 24 hrs). Orbital eccentricity combines with this effect to make analemma non symmetrical.
Если наблюдать за луной с точки(Широта: 46°20′58″ с.ш.
Долгота: 48°02′26″ в.д. ) 23 октября 2022г то будет виден старый месяц перед восходом солнца ( то есть луна будет освещена с востока на запад) а 27 октября 2022г будет виден новый месяц после захода солнца то есть луна будет освещена с запада на восток то есть с противоположного направления) а 25 октября луна будет двигаться с востока на запад со скоростью примерно 3475 км за *60*минут и будет наблюдаться солнечное затмение. Кто сможет ответить на вопрос : Как солнце за три дня перемещается примерно на 180 градусов освещая луну то востока на запад то запада на восток?
A bit of a qustion
If one of the things that make the solar analemma is the movement of the earth around the sphere make it look like that
Then why would the moon analemma is similar to the sun all tho for the moon it dosent have the movment of the earth around the sun as something that impact it analemma(i think) ?
Shouldn't the moon analemma look different as it dose not have that factor to it
I tried to answer it myself and what i got is the movement of the moon around the earth throughout the month is really similar to the earth movement around the sun throughout the year that it make it look similar
But i want a confirmation from someone that have more knowledge on the subject to go with if you put an explanation it will help too
A person takes a photo everyday of the sun at the same exact time?..So these analemma pictures are an accumulation of 365 pictures?! Just trying to understand the process a little more basically trying to understand why there are only a couple dozen “sun dots” if the pictures are taken over 365 days
❤
K how would this look on the flat Earth?
OMG 😂😂❤
Bravo. I still have questions, but I always have questions, (my need to know the intracacies and details), but this is the clearest, somehow relatable , explanation to date. There's so much more to the earth, its movement, its gravity, its atmosphere, its tilt, spin, revolution, its moon. If people only realized how amazing, unique, majestic to be living on Planet Earth..... The analemma, like you said flat out, in the very beginning, this is one of the ridiculous natural fascinations that occurs in plain sight. Absolutely off the hook. It's intensity is like that of a total solar eclipse, or annular solar eclipse, and maybe even to that of a tsunami (2004); or how most maps of the solar system do not show relative size of the planets vs the sun, however, one is thus unprepared and bewildered when seeing at a later time the map or picture of the sun up against the planets (relative size) The size of the sun is fricken scary ss hell. Even the ancients figured it out, thus labelling the sun their god. By the way, are you the photographer who created the analemma and eclipse pic? From an observatory?
7:17 there is no way this angle is 23.5º, more like 45º
3:07 the angle of the analemma does change with the latitude, but it also changes with the specific times of the day you decide to photograph it. Doesn't it?
So, the Earth doesn't revolve 'Around' the Sun? Ignoring the fact that the Sun is hurtling through space, these photos reveal that the Earth never is abreast of the Sun but, is always, beneath the Sun's north/south orientation. Which causes me to question if, as the Sun is hurtling through space, is the Earth corkscrewing a path around but rearward of the Sun's path? Are all the planets trailing the Sun?
How did you manage to get it all so terribly wrong?!
Steve: you seem intelligent. Take a telephoto lens, go at sea level and take a picture of a boat at 40 km. Apply trigonometry based on Earth radius. Not enough for you? Buy an infrared filter and take a picture from a high point. The greeks had the response right, this is our electromagnetic support, the 8 shape is our greater realm wobbling on the support…
@@myspace_forever continue to be brainwashed. You are part of the majority, so comfortable, isn't?
Keep in mind that the analemma above our beautiful non rotating flat earth requires a stationary star (Polaris) check out the antikithera mechanism AKA flat earth working model.
Sorry, but there IS no flat earth working model.
Err.. it's a porn actress isn't it?
(Sure I've seen at least _one_ of her movies)
Check out the antikythera mechanism perfect example of our beautiful NON ROTATING FLAT EARTH
Who measured the Earth's tilt?
Have you researched stationary flat earth? All of your astronomic observations are geocentric and with reference to a flat plane.
Why should anybody, especially an astronomer, research this delusional nonsense?
Please do some serious research yourself and get some reasonable knowledge about the universe.
@@Tanaquil_de_Lammerfors observing things from a distance isn't knowledge. no one truly knows anything about the universe, and it's impossible to! flat or globe.
how are there only 40 to 50 countable sun dots in the analemma if it's a single photo taken over 365 days?
@@h-dawg6462 So, when you are standing at a harbour and are watching an incoming ship in the distance, you don´t know anything about this ship or maybe you even don´t believe, that it really exists, until it moored and you are able to enter the deck?
And it is impossible to get any knowledge about a mountain or a building or a big tree in the distance just by observing them? Sounds to me like a very limited mindset.
Observing things leads to knowledge. And any progress in the observation, for example enabled by better equipment, leads to extended knowledge. That´s how science works.
Concerning the analemma, Spaceman Steve made a little mistake. Yes, a real analemma consists per definition of photos of the sun, taken from the exact same place at the exact same time on every day of a year, combined in a photographical overlay. It therefore has to show 365 or 366 suns, forming the shape of an 8.
But often, analemmas just contain 40 to 50 different photos, for example one photo a week, like the ones in the video. Maybe it´s for a better visibility of the single sun dot, that are nevertheless forming an 8.
I don´t know, but that´s no reason to ignore the scientifical relevance of analemmas in general.
But some people are not able to see, some people do not want to see.
The earth is clearly stationary U muppet
T I L T is the answer for every un-answerable question.
The speed changes according to the position with the sun, but you don't feel it, because of its uniform motion.
Suppose you are in a car, you don't feel any shit. Yes, SCIENCE is a mystery.
hey man nice video, but the globe earth model really doesn't work here. analemma would not work, and nor would a sun dial.
If you watch through the end of the video - you'll see how the analemma changes depending on planetary tilt and the amount an orbit of a planet is "squished" (using Mars as an example) -- indeed it is our tilted sphere and our orbit around the sun that precisely allow an analemma to exist :)
But were else can you be but on the globe earth ?
Just one thing. We never went to space nor the moon hahaha. You know it that we can’t pass through the firmament.
The sun is obviously moving... There is no orbit. Because if that were true then the entirety of our orbits would be constantly and dependantly in that analemma. How would the earths rotation be able to fit the Polaris north star ? I say no to globe.
ROTFL
This guy’s gotta be a closet flerfer. Which is good, because space is fake and gay, and earth is the undeniably measured flat!
No one has ever been in a second law of thermodynamics violation, i.e., a space vacuum
Flatbrain at work, always good for a laugh.
lol we will have this shape forever because there is no universe or randomness, earth is flat. Nothing you just said makes sense on globe model.
Show me a video of Earth spinning? EARTH IS FLAT
Flat Earth explain analemma better
Wow...your videos providing lot more knowledge than a textbook. Sad to see only few views and likes.
But you please keep making videos like this. Thanks for the content. 🫶🤩