There is something very reassuring about not following 99.999% of this. Just knowing that someone out there understands this, and is in fact advancing this sort of math/research means there are still people out there that are passionate and talented enough to tackle the universe.
If you happen to be passionate about it don't let it scare you. If ones hits up glossary for physics books or perhaps a physics dictionary they will find many of this seemingly complex stuff melt away as it tends to be a lot of grand ideas, about grand things but made of relatively simplistic pieces with complicated sounding names. Learning all the definitions before hand makes understanding far easier than learning them as you come across them organically.
@@ziggyj7155 Basically understanding the terminology of a subject, as opposed to learning it along the way, you will find your comprehension of the subject will dramatically increase as your brain won't have to struggle on words it doesn't know. Much of science, Physics especially, contains terms which sound far more complicated than they really are and understand the definitions of these things on a superficial level prior to getting into the meat of it all works wonders.
"Over the past few months on Space Time ... we've built the foundations needed to glimpse the true meaning of the holographic principle." Me tuning in to this video randomly: Oh shit, I just walked in to the final without ever going to class... 😰😨😰
Honestly, the stuff he says in this video must sound totally insane to people who aren't familiar with any of the material covered in the previous videos. If this video came out all on its own and didn't have the PBS label on it, I'm sure most of the commenters would accuse him of spouting nonsense.
@@awitcheskid Don't worry, many people watch all his episodes and are lucky to understand half. I like to think I understand 2/3+, but, really, who am I fooling...
You're clearly not high enough...the only way to expand your understanding is to change how you experience reality... Also, math is a language to express things not well articulated in other languages outside of programming languages, anyway. In fact, programming language may be the best way to explain this video... We are technically the code, yet we experience the virtual reality world made by the code. Our attempts to reverse engineer the code and the hardware may be impossible from our perspective, so we cheat / do it the hard way; we make models and come up with languages of it and keep reverse engineering until we make a virtual machine and code that matches.
@@Alienami I wouldn't exactly try to explain the Holographic Principle as us living in a simulation, nor reality being just a hologram. It's more the idea that our 4 perceived spatial dimensions might be in reality just 1 (I am personally not on board with this idea, which I will explain in a bit). It all basically comes down to the notion that in order for quantum mechanics to work (it is the most tested and precise science in existence), information in the universe cannot be lost. This "information" can be thought of as an equation that gives a particle causality and a somewhat defined future path -- a photon's end point location cannot really be surmised in exact details, but information in it's wave function gives you a general idea of it's end location. When matter (information) falls into a black hole, this information is seemingly lost. That kind of fubars everything that we understand about reality, time, space, even causality. Since time can be viewed as the 4th dimension, and particles (and their encoded wave function) also travel forward through time, a few theoretical physicists came up with the idea that reality might just be 1 dimensional and the 3 other dimensions we perceive just an illusion. It's doesn't mean we are living in a simulation, program, etc. A way to get around this absurd notion (at least in my mind) is to assume that all black holes have an exit... that the matter/energy/information always comes out somewhere else. This makes them not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Within Eienstien's theory of Special Relativity wormholes are possible. The birth of our own universe could have been such an event -- information coming out of a white hole that is connected to a black hole through a wormhole. It's a much more elegant and simple explanation, but I don't see anyone being able to prove this unless humans can craft a machine that would survive the voyage beyond the event horizon, which is very very very very unlikely. If a probe could survive the passage and come out the other side, it probably wouldn't even end up in our universe.
I think years in the future, he will run out of ways to add it to the end of the dialogue, so he will just say "and this video had nothing to do with...Spacetime"
So I needed to understand this, so I watched the playlist. But that required another playlist. Of which the very first video required a different video, which recommended that I also watch a different video. I now have 2.5 hours of Space Time to watch
Cus the video contains NO info , just a complete idiot promoting steven hawkings and the lairs and more lies... nothing but confusion and rubbish, a puppet put on the masses, he cant stop using the pyramid symbol with his hands , and his t-shirt has the pyramids at well with the space mans helmet being the one eye satanic god.
Who is on first. We may be intuiting the 'infinitely distant' blackhole that generated us. We're intuiting our source while embedded within the generation. Infinitely distant addresses the issue of curvature. Curvature may only be relative.
Original comment is about the complexities in describing and sorting thru the possibilities that our universe is a holographic projection. The malstrom of ideas is confusing and hard to follow. In response I made a joke using a well known comic meme about misunderstanding the simple by overcomplicated misinterpretation. What I said was we are inside of and a part of the holographic projection trying to figure out how that projection works. I then state the issue of the curvature nature of the projection may only be dependant on and relative to where the observer is. I am saying the projector of our holographic universes is a 'black hole' of a kind.
@@reahthorolund8373 - I stole it... It was in my head because someone else said it in a comment on a totally unrelated video recently. So when I heard my opportunity, I jumped at it.
respect to PBS for trying to make material like this available. Obviously you're not going to get a crystaline understanding of subjects like this in 20 meager minutes, but it's a great place to start!
@@DoubleTime999depends who you ask. At this point I'm leaning towards what the gnostics called 'The Demiurge' or Yaldabaoth as the man operating the projector.
You have really outdone yourself in this video. The level of complication you have simplified for us is astounding. Thankyou for bridging the gap from prohibitively complex to a more understandable format. You have enabled normal people to have a chance to grasp what we could otherwise probably never deciphered . Great work and thankyou.
I have been watching in a confused state for a good 3 minutes. but there is another 7 minutes left in the video This is the most brain-bending episode of Space Time yet...and this is the SIMPLIFIED version of the theory! This show is awesome
Some infinities are bigger than others. Some infinities can be nested in other infinities. Types of infinities can interact but cannot be the same thing. Your welcome.
ive been watchin you since i was in highschool and back then i coudnt understand most of it but now im an undergrad physics student and starting my final year project in quantum mechanics. watching your vedios on any topic before reading a paper gives me a baseline and a boost of confidence. you are saving a lot of my time and keeping me engaged in reserach with all your visuals so i dont get lost in math. its my go -to channel to entertain myself after getting bored with colorless reserch papers
I first wanted to study physics, but Math was never my strong point, so ended studying Software Engineering instead! Glad someone else inspired by PBS SpaceTime did end up studying Physics!
@@teaser6089I'm in the same boat, but now I'm starting to see the parallels between quantum mechanics and computer science. I wonder the implications of that notion.
Something something, holographic fractal brain space universe! What we're already inhabiting might be called 'computer space'. It's just a "matter" of creating a sort of "video game at the end of time" ... Probably some omniscient AI network will do.
Actually he does not mention key components, like the fact that the surface of a black hole can contain all the information inside it only because the inside of a black hole is the same everywhere. Our universe is not homogeneous like that and cannot be contained on the surface of "sphere".
@@En_theo "the inside of a black hole is the same everywhere"? how is that possible? density increases as you travel towards the singularity - isn't it therefore non-homogeneous?
@@michaelovertonbrown The density at the center of a black hole is infinite. It's not progressive. Maybe you mixed up the singularity and the surroundings ?
My research into quantum computing led me here. As Heisenberg famously said, "not only is the universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think". I look forward to more enlightenment of physics, brilliantly explained and visualised in these videos.
Cameras are available that capture images at a distance of fifty miles. Mysteriously, such images are relatively rare in the media and as a topic of discussion are even more rare.
well the earth would necessarily be flat in spacial dimensions but actually more like a cylinder when you add time? Ah beer, the cause of, and solution to, all our problems.
@@deanmetcalfe1174 ... Sometimes, more like rungs on a ladder, the ladder to be disposed of when it has served its purpose, according to Ludwig Wittgenstein... But then, we are joking around; Right?... ;-)
Yes, you start to wonder if human science/philosophy is just going through iterations kind of like history does. String theory for example: the strings vibrate in accordance with the laws of harmonic resonance. If that reminds you of the old "Music of the Spheres" concept, you're by far not the only one. The holographic principle is also a perfect example.: there's this concept called the Akashic Records, which is generally dismissed as mystical hoo-doo, but look at what is says. It states that the entire history of the universe (our 3-D universe, that is) is recorded on a sacred scroll (that would be a 2-D surface) somewhere out in the realm of the Gods (i.e. - the farthest reaches of the creation). Are we making a scientific breakthrough, or are we just using fancy mathematics to come full circle back to what some ancient philosophers speculated?
Taoists conceptualized this well before plato. The Tao is the true reality and everything we experience is not the true Tao. We can describe an apple but we never experience the true Tao of an apple. in fact the Tao Te Ching opens with "the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao." Which means the same thing as "the universe is stranger than we CAN know"
@@YogiMcCaw or it could mean all roads lead to the same answer... eventually. The Chinese idea of kung fu, in its boiled down from, and also Japanese zen touch on this idea. If you master one thing completely you have mastered all things
Any dimension past time can only be one of thought or consciousness past "3-d" is all consciousness.... consciousness needs an "avatar" or body to experience this portion of reality. This is how you know consciousness is eternal. We could not exist if it weren't. You could say souls or consciousness are "packets" of information that have become bigger than regular "information". Cyberspace in our own network here in 3'd land is a facsimile of the "cyberspace" of "reality". WHich all consciousness flows through from the Source or God or the Truth. Scientists are trying to explain the consciousness part of reality with physical mathematics which is impossible... it cannot be represented here. Only theorized at. That's why they are called met physics.
@@MysticleMonster This is what I think through my own speculation OBVIOUSLY sorry if it seemed like I was speaking in absolutes there is no way to absolutely certain of anything outside of our 5 senses and OBVIOUSLY there are things outside of those senses and they can only be speculated upon even with tool to extend our senses we can only experience those tools through the 5 senses limitations suck I know. This is why they are called Meta Physics.
It's funny that you say that, because in Windows 7, I had a desktop widget that looked like a black hole which replaced the recycle bin and would just delete things permanently immediately. It was great.
So could that dual representation be taken a step further to having a representation in every dimension? Even going beyond 4D, to 5D, 6D, an infinite amount of times? Also would there be such a thing as having no dimension, or is that a singularity?
Me too but I'll be back. I believe that trying to learn things too complex for me makes it easier to assimilate easier concepts, but I had too much wine and beer in the last 6 hours for that to work.
@@sapien153 it would be hilarious to tell the flat earthers that they were actually right all along... but surprise, not only the earth is flat, but everything else too 😅👌
After repeat viewings, and watching the recommended background videos, I think I get about 25% of it. But I'll gladly accept your respect in the spirit it was offered!
@Enter the Bragn’ you're not the one to say that, and even if it's wrong (and again, you're not the one who determine that), you need to appreciate the math and the logic behind it
@Enter the Bragn’ 😂😂 you made me laugh lol, Honestly, If the explanation of the universe is less complicated than this, I'd be doubtful of it, because the universe is complex in itself.
**At one point i noticed the expression on my face that i had...** "The tension on my facial muscles was so high due the concentration and the huge effort that i was putting in of trying to understanding the sentences and the words that it was constructed from, plus trying to keep up with the next... and the next sentence.., then making more effort to glue them together and get somewhat a picture of what was been presented to me, or what i had to envision with this presentation/explanation that when i saw "bananas", i just ran out of RAM..." **Quietly i hit the like button like a good boy...**
Jinxed When the screen suddenly went black I caught a mirror image of myself. What I saw was every muscle in my face going slack and my jaw hanging and my mouth gaping. I was breathing through my mouth and my eyes looked vacant. I feel a need to go dig a hole in the dirt.
The only question I'm left with is, "How could anyone understand all of this, well enough, to be able to come up with even more difficult questions to ask??"
@@Snipergoat1 well yeah but first try to understand it completely before commenting. And if you don't understand it, that's absolutely fine, but DON'T continuously keep commenting "I never understand what you are talking about." You know that if this Matt O Dowd sees only comments saying I didn't understand anything, then he will feel really bad, like his effort into simplifying is going waste. And while he clearly is a human being and to err is human, so he might not be so good in explaining, I really get pissed when I see only comments not supporting him.
@@vedantsridhar8378 I understood well enough it's just this is a learning video, we are here to learn. Sometimes people leave comments that come off as lame. Welcome to the internet. I think the spacetime crew is happy enough with another view and a comment. Two things that boost their rankings. I only get (lightly) irritated by comments that are malicious, dissuasive or willfully ignorant. Although this video has a lot more of those then most Spacetime vids, his was not. With the views on this video so high perhaps it attracted a bit more mainstream audience. This will naturally affect the tone of the comments. I guess I'm saying cut the guys some slack, we are all here to learn something. Save your venom for the jerks.
Math. You can conceptually simplify complex realities using math. That's why so much of new physics started as a way to get the math right. Like adding string length as a 4th dimension.
You should try eating a handful of mushrooms in a cold TN winter night, while sitting in a McDonalds parking lot and learning some crazy shit from this guy.
Weyl Invariance is the most understandable explanation of multiple extra dimensions that I've ever heard and I've been interested in string theory and theoretical physics for over 10 years. Unbelieveable. I love this series.
"If anyone feels like drawing Roger Penrose dressed as Gandalf with a lightsaber and a TARDIS, you would win the internet." Actually quantum mechanics forbids this.
I really want to take you up on this challenge.... But in all reality isn't Penrose, Gandalf and Yoda the same thing? And wouldnt that just make it all redundant anyway? Or am I just too lazy to draw right now lol.
Yeshua Immanuel Christ 🐟 05. THE PHENOMENAL UNIVERSE: The fact that the external, phenomenal universe (“prakṛti”, in Sanskrit) of names and forms (“nāmarūpa”, in Sanskrit/Pali) exists solely within personal consciousness (and by extension, Universal Consciousness), is superlatively logical. If this material world actually existed as a separate reality, then obviously, it would have limits, because the nature of matter is that it has a measurable, three-dimensional finitude. Therefore, if one were to travel to the edge of the universe, there would need to be something WITHOUT the boundary of the universe (some other ’’universe’’, which contains this universe). This contradicts the very concept of a universe (literally, “turned into one”). The late, great Professor Dr. Alan Watts’ response to the question: “where is the universe located?”, was: “nowhere and everywhere”. This phenomenal manifestation is composed of space, time, energy, and matter, the latter of which comprises eight elemental groups - the five GROSS elements (“mahābhūta”, in Sanskrit), which are perceivable by at least one of the five senses, and the three SUBTLE elements (“tanmātra” or “atisūkṣma mātra”, in Sanskrit), which are symptomatic of localized consciousness. N. B. Dark matter is not included in this system, as cosmological science has yet to determine its structural composition. The five gross material elements and three subtle material elements are (from most gross to most subtle): SOLIDS (AKA earth - “bhūmiḥ” or “pṛthivī”, in Sanskrit) are made of densely-packed atoms and molecules of a steady shape at room temperature. LIQUIDS (AKA water - “jala” or “āpaḥ”, in Sanskrit) are composed of moderately dense molecules (usually including at least some water) of no fixed shape. GAS (AKA air - “vāyuḥ” or “marut”, in Sanskrit) consists of rarefied atomic particles of no fixed shape. HEAT (AKA fire - “analaḥ” or “tejas”, in Sanskrit) is made of kinetic energy (which may or may not appear visibly as fire, or at least heat waves). ETHER (AKA space - “ākāśa” or “khaṃ”, in Sanskrit) is a vacuum consisting of three-dimensional space (length, breadth, and width). However, recent investigation has confirmed that empty space is actually filled with virtual particles (matter and antimatter). Thus, the explanation for the material universe being created from “nothing” (anti-matter) is plausible, according to quantum field theory. MIND (“manaḥ”, in Sanskrit) is composed of sensual perceptions, instinctual thoughts, abstract images (including memories and fantasies), and emotions. Not all animal species possess a mind, but function purely on base instincts, originating from their genetic code, via a rudimentary nervous system. INTELLECT (“buddhiḥ”, in Sanskrit) consists of conceptual thoughts. Only the very higher species of animal life possess an intellectual capacity. PSEUDO-EGO (“ahaṃkāraḥ”, in Sanskrit) is comprised of the “I” thought (in this case, the illusory, ephemeral self-identity). Only humans possess the self-awareness necessary to question their own existence. Read Chapter 10 for a full elucidation of egoity. Each of the FIVE gross material elements corresponds to one of the senses of the body. E.g. In outer space, where there is a vacuum (ether), one can detect light with the eyes, yet space is not tactile and cannot be smelled or tasted, nor can sound waves travel via space. At the opposite extreme, solid matter can be seen with the eyes, felt with the sense of touch, tasted with the tongue, smelt with the nose, and heard with the ear (when the solid matter is physically vibrated). Beyond these eight material elements is the TRUE self - which pervades the entire body, and indeed, which is the Universal Self (“ayam ātmā brahma”, in Sanskrit). That explains why we say: “This is my body” or “I possess a mind”. Who is the owner of the body and the mind? It is us, the anti-matter, the inextinguishable authentic self/Self (“ātmana/Paramātmana”, in Sanskrit). Ultimately speaking, the Universal Self alone is. HOWEVER, all eight elements are in fact “made” of Consciousness, since, as demonstrated previously, naught but Consciousness exists. Consciousness is the ultimate reality (“prajñānam brahma”, in Sanskrit). Just as a wedding ring is contingent on gold for its very existence, so too does the phenomenal universe depend entirely on ”Beingness” or “Isness”, Consciousness, and Blissful Awareness. Although The Absolute cannot be verbally-described, (otherwise, it would be an OBJECT), as a concession to materialists, Infinite Consciousness has said to exhibit three innate attributes, known as “sacchidānanda”, a compounded Sanskrit epithet, consisting of the three words “sat”, “cit” and “ānanda” - Eternal Being(ness), Existence, or Truth; Conscious Knowledge; and Perfect Peace (often translated as “bliss”. However, the term “bliss” connotes an ephemeral experience of euphoria, whereas “peace” is the absence of any form of temporal suffering). Because Absolutely Nothing (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit) is Infinite Creative Potentiality, ‘it’ actualizes as Absolutely Everything. Attributeless Consciousness at Rest (in Sanskrit, “Nirguna Brahman”) manifests as this phenomenal universe (Consciousness in Action, or in Sanskrit, “Saguna Brahman”). In the verbiage of quantum physics, the enfolded implicate order ‘becomes’ the unfolded explicate order. In REALITY there is no separation of anything at any time (assuming that Consciousness is a “thing”, and that time is an attribute of The Uncaused Absolute). That the total sum energy of the universe is zero, implies the non-existence of matter (i. e. no thing is objectively real). The phenomenal manifestation is eternally cyclical, because ‘coming into existence’ implies ‘going out of existence’, just as ‘black’ implies the existence of ‘white’, or as ‘rich’ implies ‘poor’. Is it possible to have something without nothing? Obviously not, because the two go together, as interrelated opposites. Similarly, despite what most believe, the outer-world is as much the Self as the inner-world. Where is the boundary of the human body? When we look at a person, we cannot see that person UNLESS we also see the background image. The two are inseparable, just as a flower and a bee cannot exist without the other. This fact alone is ample evidence that the universe is a holistic and wholistic system or entity. You who are reading these words are that Totality of Existence, the Highest Universal Principle, the Essential Irreducible Self. In common parlance, you are God (IF you only knew it!). Most of the greatest sages in history have spoken about either or both these concepts (of the Absolute Truth being either Absolutely Everything or Absolute Nothingness), such as the concept of “form is emptiness and emptiness is form” in Buddhism, or in Avatar Meher Baba's book “The Everything and the Nothing” (which is highly-recommended, particularly Chapters 51 to 56, which poetically describe the Ineffable One-without-a-second). Even an ordinary writer, American author Kurt Vonnegut, once penned: “Everything is nothing - with a twist”. The Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics professor, Doctor Leonard Susskind's so-called “minus-first law of physics” states that information is INDESTRUCTIBLE. This is akin to the law of conservation of energy in classical physics, and proves that neither physical or psychic energy is lost. Read subsequent chapters to learn more about how this law relates to the notion of reincarnation, as well as to miraculous phenomena such as savant syndrome. The planet on which we are residing consists of animate/organic life, as well as inanimate/inorganic matter. The six stages of ORGANIC life are: 1. conception/birth 2. growth/development 3. maintenance 4. reproduction 5. ageing/deterioration 6. death British polymath Thomas Young's famous double-slit experiment suggests that matter exists purely as potentiality or as a "possibility" until it is observed by a conscious being. This phenomenon, known as the wave-particle duality, is often discussed in advanced spiritual discourses, as it gives credence to the primacy of Consciousness. There are other aspects of the universe (e.g. the various philosophical approaches to the nature of ontological time, the accelerated expanding universe, holographic universe principle, quantum superposition, wave function, and quantum entanglement), as well as the possibility of life on other planets, the crop circle phenomenon, and the presence of the Fibonacci sequence in nature, which are beyond the scope of this document, and which do not directly relate to the most exigent thing in life (to find the unending peace/happiness which we humans are ULTIMATELY seeking).
“Find out who you REALLY are so that when death comes…there is no-one to kill, for while you are identified with your role, with your name, with your ego, there is someone to kill. But when you are identified with the whole universe, death finds you already annihilated and there’s no-one to kill”. ************* “Just as you depend on the universe, so too does the universe depend on YOU. Everything depends on everything else.” Professor Alan W. Watts, British-American Philosopher.
An astonishing good comprehensible, though deep explanation. Another hint of the holographic principle (similar to the Bekenstein entropy) is that the event horizon of a black hole is proportional to its mass and NOT proportional to the third root of its mass.
Another hint: If you took all the mass-energy of the observable universe, and compressed it to a point to create a black hole, the Schwarzschild radius of that black hole would be the cosmic event horizon.
@@muhaiminurrahman4288 yeah. I don't get the ignorance here. It doesn't take a genius to realize that our universe exists in forward to back, left to right, and up and down
@@thebboi3339 I was actually referring to @Who Dis? Edit: However, yours is sensible too. I guess we are at that point in time where you can say anything about the universe and find subsequent theories to uphold your claim! Mad times these are!
@TROPICAL SUMMER IS COMING FOR THOSE WHO GET IT!!! dude, why are you shouting? Do you live on a planet where no one can be heard unless they shout over everyone else? Or are you just loud?
A way to understand this is to think of it like vr. You have computer code that is 2 dimensional which appears to have depth (3 dimensions) when you put it on. In vr, things look 3 dimensional even though it’s made of 2d code
Nobody: PBS: An abstract mathematical surface, infinitely far from our location and from our intuition. Projecting inwards our familiar holographic space time.
"Now that you've mastered driving the M808V, let's move on to some safety features." ... "No! No, wait! Go back! Why are there six pedals if there are only four directions?"
I watched all the vids leading up to this one by one as many times as it took for me to fully understand them. Now I can understand this and I'm so glad. Awesome stuff thanks for the series
Don't worry. That's how it started for most of us, but with enough videos you start to understand more and more. Except for string theory of course. If you think you understand string theory, you do not understand string theory xD
@The Jim Reaper™ If the universe is holographic, it always was holographic so there is no aparent difference for us. The only real change would be our understanding of fundamentals of our universe, which would allow us to create new technology that could make life better (or end it.. whatever the intention is). But we do not really know how these would look like yet. It'd just be a new chapter in science.
@@liquidminds just like most foundational physics, I don't think this will have any repercussions for technology (except indirectly in the development of test equipment or faster computers). Stuff like this is much more important than just progressing technology anyway- this is what progression in technology and mathematics is FOR.
Event Horizon project was made, bunch of dudes said, "Let's photo a blackhole!", M87's SM Blackhole happened to have a cloud of gas in its vicinity, gas fell into the blackhole, gas orbited the blackhole which caused it to heat up and glow, glowing gas shows the "shadow" of the blackhole, and Event Horizon project takes the image. Nerds (including myself) everywhere have an orgasm.
@@Nilguiri Good videos but many questions remain. Is there a singularity? Or are black holes fuzzy (string theory) balls of strings jammed together? As an object falls towards a black hole and is accelerated to light speed (almost) where does its kinetic energy come from? Is spacetime itself sucked into a black hole? What about dark matter?
To say this is tough stuff is an understatement. Here is my advice: 1. Watch this thing on repeat until it clicks. or... 2. Put the playback speed at .75 or even .5
At ~ one minute in, I paraphrase: "The concept of a holographic universe is complex, and over past few months, we've built up to it with the following six videos. You might want to go watch those first, in order, before watching this one". My response: Watch this one, then the immediately preceding one, back up to the original, in reverse order. My recommendation: Don't be an idiot! That is NOT the right way to do it. You're probably a lot more sensible than I and don't need to be told that, but just in case: Start at the beginning, and move forwards towards this. They're interesting, well-done, and help enrich understanding once you DO get to this one.
Matt - this was very well done, I enjoyed it immensely. Long ago, when I was receiving training in hyperspace mathematics (which is now beyond my abiliy, due to both severe head injury as well as the passage of decades), I was of the firm opinion that a degree of freedom and a dimension were one and the same thing - all that differs is your application of the math. Likewise Prof. Witten's work shows that five very different systems of string mathematics represent an identity of structure - they are alternate views of the same structure. I find this sort of thing is not rare in physics or mathemetics (which after all, is the fundamental language of physics) hence -
I'm sorry to hear about your injury. :( I've recently been considering "time" to be yet another dimension of space, simply pinpointing the location of an object along its worldline. To your understanding, would this be an accurate assessment at all? Or completely false due to the maths?
@@christianyaerger1751 Yes, that would be an accurate assessment. An object's address requires x,y,z and its location in time. Else you will not find the object. On a graph, math treats time just like any other dimension. Physics also treats time like other dimensions, the laws of physics work as well with time reversed. A difference though - is that our minds experience time as a constrained dimension - the constraint being our sense of experience can move only in one direction. This is very much like the constraint experienced on the vertical axis when an object descends below the event horizon of a black hole. It is fun to consider what happens to the time axis under those circumstances (and why).
Why do we know that we don't live in an ADS space? Wouldn't hyperbolic spatial curvature make far away galaxies appear to accelerate, just like dark energy does?
@@amartya-w3i Thanks for engaging. I noticed the calculation from the CMB argument later, when I did some google searching. Still though, it seems odd that the CMB shows a flat universe while far away galaxies are accelerating away from us faster and faster, like they are falling off a far away curve in spacetime. We could maybe explain both if it turned out that we just weren't thinking about the way that the expansion of space interacted with the CMB correctly. It is more likely that I just don't understand though.
@@amartya-w3i who cares about calculus. The question was about reality, which can only be measured. Currently, the Universe appears to be flat, but we have only measured down to about the 0.4% level. To actually test the curvature we need distances hundreds times larger than the observable Universe.
“Yog-Sothoth knows the gate. Yog-Sothoth is the gate. Yog-Sothoth is the key and guardian of the gate. Past, present, future, all are one in Yog-Sothoth. He knows where the Old Ones broke through of old, and where They shall break through again. He knows where They have trod earth's fields, and where They still tread them, and why no one can behold Them as They tread.” :p
New PBS Space video + First image of a Black Hole = Best day of the year.
The Exoplanets Channel 😊
When? Where?
@@JP-re3bc couple of hours ago
And SpaceX should hopefully be launching Falcon Heavy tonight as well.
Honestly it's kinda boring looking but given what it is it's probably my favorite picture I ever seen as of late
Who ever did the music and animations of this episode deserves a raise
Sure. But that music creeped the living shit out of me.
Agreed
And they deserve a cut for "plank" length...it's Planck for crying out loud!
I wish they would release all of the musics they use, they are so good, there is one that every time I hear it, I just go into overdrive.
@@nafrost2787 I bet it is the taaaaaaaaaaaa tiiiiraaaaroooooooooo melody
It’s amazing what we can do with the same brains we used to throw stones at each other.
No man! Those brains are long dead
@@Rsiatat Now we have advanced rocks.
Like we’re not still throwing stones at one another😂
I throw rocks at neighbor dog when it barks at me i think dogs smart
Nafrost language played a huge role in that.
There is something very reassuring about not following 99.999% of this. Just knowing that someone out there understands this, and is in fact advancing this sort of math/research means there are still people out there that are passionate and talented enough to tackle the universe.
@@edmondt848 yeah... no you don't. you use the laughing crying emoji, which immediately shows your IQ is less than 60
If you happen to be passionate about it don't let it scare you. If ones hits up glossary for physics books or perhaps a physics dictionary they will find many of this seemingly complex stuff melt away as it tends to be a lot of grand ideas, about grand things but made of relatively simplistic pieces with complicated sounding names. Learning all the definitions before hand makes understanding far easier than learning them as you come across them organically.
@@seditt5146 i really do get this innate feeling of “I know what you’re saying but I don’t know what you’re saying.”
@@ziggyj7155 Basically understanding the terminology of a subject, as opposed to learning it along the way, you will find your comprehension of the subject will dramatically increase as your brain won't have to struggle on words it doesn't know. Much of science, Physics especially, contains terms which sound far more complicated than they really are and understand the definitions of these things on a superficial level prior to getting into the meat of it all works wonders.
@William Jennings bro what
"Over the past few months on Space Time ... we've built the foundations needed to glimpse the true meaning of the holographic principle."
Me tuning in to this video randomly: Oh shit, I just walked in to the final without ever going to class... 😰😨😰
Honestly, the stuff he says in this video must sound totally insane to people who aren't familiar with any of the material covered in the previous videos. If this video came out all on its own and didn't have the PBS label on it, I'm sure most of the commenters would accuse him of spouting nonsense.
Yeah, PBS Space-time is basically a upper level college physics class where the homework is optional. I imagine it's hard to just watch random videos.
@@danieljensen2626 It is. Source: I just watch random videos, and I only understand about half of what he's saying.
@@awitcheskid
Don't worry, many people watch all his episodes and are lucky to understand half. I like to think I understand 2/3+, but, really, who am I fooling...
Check out their playlists.
Yup. I think I'm gonna need to watch this series a couple more times to get this.
Or infinitely many times.
@@gabor6259 Instructions not clear, I'm now a black hole..
Bjarni Valur Join the club!
You're clearly not high enough...the only way to expand your understanding is to change how you experience reality...
Also, math is a language to express things not well articulated in other languages outside of programming languages, anyway.
In fact, programming language may be the best way to explain this video...
We are technically the code, yet we experience the virtual reality world made by the code.
Our attempts to reverse engineer the code and the hardware may be impossible from our perspective, so we cheat / do it the hard way; we make models and come up with languages of it and keep reverse engineering until we make a virtual machine and code that matches.
@@Alienami I wouldn't exactly try to explain the Holographic Principle as us living in a simulation, nor reality being just a hologram. It's more the idea that our 4 perceived spatial dimensions might be in reality just 1 (I am personally not on board with this idea, which I will explain in a bit). It all basically comes down to the notion that in order for quantum mechanics to work (it is the most tested and precise science in existence), information in the universe cannot be lost. This "information" can be thought of as an equation that gives a particle causality and a somewhat defined future path -- a photon's end point location cannot really be surmised in exact details, but information in it's wave function gives you a general idea of it's end location. When matter (information) falls into a black hole, this information is seemingly lost. That kind of fubars everything that we understand about reality, time, space, even causality. Since time can be viewed as the 4th dimension, and particles (and their encoded wave function) also travel forward through time, a few theoretical physicists came up with the idea that reality might just be 1 dimensional and the 3 other dimensions we perceive just an illusion. It's doesn't mean we are living in a simulation, program, etc.
A way to get around this absurd notion (at least in my mind) is to assume that all black holes have an exit... that the matter/energy/information always comes out somewhere else. This makes them not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Within Eienstien's theory of Special Relativity wormholes are possible. The birth of our own universe could have been such an event -- information coming out of a white hole that is connected to a black hole through a wormhole. It's a much more elegant and simple explanation, but I don't see anyone being able to prove this unless humans can craft a machine that would survive the voyage beyond the event horizon, which is very very very very unlikely. If a probe could survive the passage and come out the other side, it probably wouldn't even end up in our universe.
I love how you end every single discussion with "spacetime"
... and I hate it. Perhaps appreciation of cute tag lines is a conserved quantity.
I think its good to have such traditions especially since the underlying topic of all these videos is ...........spacetime
@@discovermajid And the channel name is PBS... spacetime
I think years in the future, he will run out of ways to add it to the end of the dialogue, so he will just say
"and this video had nothing to do with...Spacetime"
No one on earth has solved spacetime prove me wrong.
‘Wait, what’ *rewinds*
3 seconds later. ‘Wait, what’ *rewinds*
Are you still rewinding?
He broke the rewind button although that might not have been due to this video.
Haha. I was doing that. my brane! fell into a black hole. I'm going to try listening to it in reverse
I was like, "why is he saying this stuff like it's common knowledge?" And, "I feel stupid." 😅😅😅
@@JohnVanderbeck legend has it he still is
So I needed to understand this, so I watched the playlist. But that required another playlist. Of which the very first video required a different video, which recommended that I also watch a different video. I now have 2.5 hours of Space Time to watch
This is like a school course I been watching for 3 years now and still lost 😆
And now you understand recursion also.
Look at you, now you know how to study. Good job! :)
The only reason you don't have infinite hours of playlist to get through is because it is all projected from infinitely far away ;)
PBS Spacetime is a super massive black hole
The only part of the video that i understand is when he tried to sell merch.
we live in the matrix. -buddah
he just adds the prof, instead of explaining the implications
I didn’t even get that one right, where’s the link for the merch????!
Cus the video contains NO info , just a complete idiot promoting steven hawkings and the lairs and more lies... nothing but confusion and rubbish, a puppet put on the masses, he cant stop using the pyramid symbol with his hands , and his t-shirt has the pyramids at well with the space mans helmet being the one eye satanic god.
Ha Ha !! Nice one MaxiMan, Thanks for the laugh !
I think he's outlined a mathematical framework for the "One Size Fits All" tee shirt, knit from loops of string theory.
The most trippy Spacetime episode ever, love it :D
If this had been released on april fools, I would have had no problem believing it was all just convoluted, made up gibberish XD
I bet you haven't watched one on baryon acoustic oscillations..😂
Ends with Sir Roger Penrose holding a lightsaber in Gandalf's cloths. David Lynch, your move. ;)
One of these days Matt will troll us with something totally fictitious and we won’t even know it 😂😂😂
so true
string theory is fictitious so he already has 😚
@@MikehMike01 yeah but not "totally fictitious" as the comment said. String theory is theoretical so, fictitious but still possible.
I think he has its called simulation theory..lol.
@Brad Watson you need some serqual
I'm confused, can you please make explanation video for this one?
I think that's the purpose of the preceding linked videos.
Who is on first.
We may be intuiting the 'infinitely distant' blackhole that generated us. We're intuiting our source while embedded within the generation.
Infinitely distant addresses the issue of curvature. Curvature may only be relative.
I don't understand what you mean. Please explain your question. 🤣
Original comment is about the complexities in describing and sorting thru the possibilities that our universe is a holographic projection. The malstrom of ideas is confusing and hard to follow.
In response I made a joke using a well known comic meme about misunderstanding the simple by overcomplicated misinterpretation.
What I said was we are inside of and a part of the holographic projection trying to figure out how that projection works. I then state the issue of the curvature nature of the projection may only be dependant on and relative to where the observer is.
I am saying the projector of our holographic universes is a 'black hole' of a kind.
@@georgehunter2813 tfw you explain your joke to someone who was also making a joke and both your jokes were aimed at the same person. ;-)
When you feel completely on top of a lecture and go to the bathroom and somehow come back two semesters behind.
@Myrmidon when you post the best comment on a video, but no one read it 'cause you were a little late
@@SYnchronYSe he has a very good theory there
We live in a universe with many dimensions:
Up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A, B, A, Select, Start
This is hilarious. How did this even enter your mind?
@@reahthorolund8373 - I stole it... It was in my head because someone else said it in a comment on a totally unrelated video recently. So when I heard my opportunity, I jumped at it.
Mortal kombat Nintendo version?
Did I just go back in time to 1987?
That's sounds like the alladin code from the Sega Genesis
respect to PBS for trying to make material like this available. Obviously you're not going to get a crystaline understanding of subjects like this in 20 meager minutes, but it's a great place to start!
It would be Penrose's ultimate triumph if it turned out we all lived in an overhead projector.
Who’s behind the projector
@@DoubleTime999 This guy: ruclips.net/video/xlSMME-Cl5g/видео.html
@@DoubleTime999depends who you ask. At this point I'm leaning towards what the gnostics called 'The Demiurge' or Yaldabaoth as the man operating the projector.
You have really outdone yourself in this video. The level of complication you have simplified for us is astounding. Thankyou for bridging the gap from prohibitively complex to a more understandable format. You have enabled normal people to have a chance to grasp what we could otherwise probably never deciphered . Great work and thankyou.
Speak for yourself. - human apes
You guys understood this 😲
Simplified ... not so much
You understood this? ..any of it? What part was simplified?..
Full of crap, just as suspected.
I have been watching in a confused state for a good 3 minutes.
but there is another 7 minutes left in the video
This is the most brain-bending episode of Space Time yet...and this is the SIMPLIFIED version of the theory!
This show is awesome
Its easier to comprehend if you have a background in Tesla, electric universe, Aether, and magick.
Some infinities are bigger than others. Some infinities can be nested in other infinities. Types of infinities can interact but cannot be the same thing. Your welcome.
@@Damstraight68 Thank you indeed.
ive been watchin you since i was in highschool and back then i coudnt understand most of it but now im an undergrad physics student and starting my final year project in quantum mechanics. watching your vedios on any topic before reading a paper gives me a baseline and a boost of confidence. you are saving a lot of my time and keeping me engaged in reserach with all your visuals so i dont get lost in math. its my go -to channel to entertain myself after getting bored with colorless reserch papers
Felt this 😂
I first wanted to study physics, but Math was never my strong point, so ended studying Software Engineering instead!
Glad someone else inspired by PBS SpaceTime did end up studying Physics!
@@teaser6089I'm in the same boat, but now I'm starting to see the parallels between quantum mechanics and computer science. I wonder the implications of that notion.
Something something, holographic fractal brain space universe! What we're already inhabiting might be called 'computer space'. It's just a "matter" of creating a sort of "video game at the end of time" ... Probably some omniscient AI network will do.
Well, at least he SEEMS to understand what he is talking about.
I think he does, but it looks like he doesn't believe in it.
Actually he does not mention key components, like the fact that the surface of a black hole can contain all the information inside it only because the inside of a black hole is the same everywhere. Our universe is not homogeneous like that and cannot be contained on the surface of "sphere".
@@En_theo "the inside of a black hole is the same everywhere"? how is that possible? density increases as you travel towards the singularity - isn't it therefore non-homogeneous?
@@michaelovertonbrown
The density at the center of a black hole is infinite. It's not progressive. Maybe you mixed up the singularity and the surroundings ?
@kmurder02
Whatever bobo
"That's... tough to imagine..., so let's go to our depiction of an infinite hyperbolic space from the last episode. :) ". Right.
Lol
Yeah that cleared it right up for me... Lol
Lmao
All I know about hyperbolic space is Goku trains in it I'm pretty sure.
@@system0fadowner251 Lol, bro as soon I heard hyperbolic I said " Where is he going with this? It cant be where my brain just did!
Dear pbs spacetime, thanks for the DMT trip.
My research into quantum computing led me here. As Heisenberg famously said, "not only is the universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think". I look forward to more enlightenment of physics, brilliantly explained and visualised in these videos.
I love breaking bad! 😆
@@DasViking i immediately thought of breaking bad lol
@@yourfriendlyneighborhoodcl4824 😂😆
The one who knocks
I doubt very much that it is stranger than I can think.
I shall take that as a challenge. 6:21
I understood almost none of this at any real level, but it's fascinating nonetheless.
😂💯
lol...its fun to watch tho..
So begins the war between flat-earthers and flat-universers
"War of the Words"
@@davidschadeberg3786 "Words be nimble words be quick words resemble walking sticks." quote: Jim Morrison
Cameras are available that capture images at a distance of fifty miles. Mysteriously, such images are relatively rare in the media and as a topic of discussion are even more rare.
well the earth would necessarily be flat in spacial dimensions but actually more like a cylinder when you add time?
Ah beer, the cause of, and solution to, all our problems.
@@deanmetcalfe1174 ... Sometimes, more like rungs on a ladder, the ladder to be disposed of when it has served its purpose, according to Ludwig Wittgenstein... But then, we are joking around; Right?... ;-)
Hi Matt, I hope you see this I just wanted to say thank you, this is the best channel on RUclips
I totally agree!!
This reminds me of Plato's concept of the world we experience as a mere shadow, or projection, of the ultimate reality.
I think you're onto something
Yes, you start to wonder if human science/philosophy is just going through iterations kind of like history does. String theory for example: the strings vibrate in accordance with the laws of harmonic resonance. If that reminds you of the old "Music of the Spheres" concept, you're by far not the only one. The holographic principle is also a perfect example.: there's this concept called the Akashic Records, which is generally dismissed as mystical hoo-doo, but look at what is says. It states that the entire history of the universe (our 3-D universe, that is) is recorded on a sacred scroll (that would be a 2-D surface) somewhere out in the realm of the Gods (i.e. - the farthest reaches of the creation).
Are we making a scientific breakthrough, or are we just using fancy mathematics to come full circle back to what some ancient philosophers speculated?
Taoists conceptualized this well before plato. The Tao is the true reality and everything we experience is not the true Tao. We can describe an apple but we never experience the true Tao of an apple. in fact the Tao Te Ching opens with "the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao." Which means the same thing as "the universe is stranger than we CAN know"
@@YogiMcCaw or it could mean all roads lead to the same answer... eventually. The Chinese idea of kung fu, in its boiled down from, and also Japanese zen touch on this idea. If you master one thing completely you have mastered all things
English has never felt more like a foregin language to me than when watching this video.
Luckily it's already a foreign language to me and I have nothing to lose 😅
English? I don't think that was English. I don't know what language that was.
@@carolinesmith1 Or the topic is so hardit was never meant to be explained to a layman.atleast he tried.
I think most of it was intelligible eg the stuff with the grid and scales and encoding of information.
@@danielhicks1824 yes, I'm speaking more to the account in general.
Its like...I know the words you're saying, but I dont understand the sentences
I thought the same thing until I went back and noticed that I didn't even know most of the words.
haha so true
I went back and did 12 years of school again and now I am sure I do not understand
Can you imagine knowing all this stuff that they cover. I mean, how does Matt even look at us ordinary people Lol. : /
It's only place for Angels, You are in Trouble
After you are done with Cosmology, how about an episode on quantum loop gravity?
I second.
Please!
Amen! And if you do one, please explain a bit about how discrete spacetime helps us get rid off the divergences in QFT without renormalisation.
@@LuisAldamiz third
Agree. I would watch episodes about other quantum gravity candidates too.
Wow. The music score for this video is probably arguably the best out of all the Space Time videos I've ever seen so far!
This video proved I'm dumb in every dimension.
Any dimension past time can only be one of thought or consciousness past "3-d" is all consciousness.... consciousness needs an "avatar" or body to experience this portion of reality. This is how you know consciousness is eternal. We could not exist if it weren't. You could say souls or consciousness are "packets" of information that have become bigger than regular "information". Cyberspace in our own network here in 3'd land is a facsimile of the "cyberspace" of "reality". WHich all consciousness flows through from the Source or God or the Truth. Scientists are trying to explain the consciousness part of reality with physical mathematics which is impossible... it cannot be represented here. Only theorized at. That's why they are called met physics.
@@Andronicus87 Your first mistake is that you are speaking in absolutes. These are alot of bold claims for not providing any evidence.
@@MysticleMonster This is what I think through my own speculation OBVIOUSLY sorry if it seemed like I was speaking in absolutes there is no way to absolutely certain of anything outside of our 5 senses and OBVIOUSLY there are things outside of those senses and they can only be speculated upon even with tool to extend our senses we can only experience those tools through the 5 senses limitations suck I know. This is why they are called Meta Physics.
Knowing you're dumb is the first step to being less dumb.
@@lyrimetacurl0 I'm thrilled.
Black holes are just the recycle bin on some nerds computer
Shut up nerd
It's funny that you say that, because in Windows 7, I had a desktop widget that looked like a black hole which replaced the recycle bin and would just delete things permanently immediately. It was great.
Lol
@@RobbieBlue "...and wo to him who falls in!" ~ Nikos Kazantzakis (The Odessy: A Modern Sequel)
BBB - That's very good! Dam good comment!
Love the Mandelbrot set zoom, but it needs more pumping techno and a stroboscope.
Nope, it's fine !
So could that dual representation be taken a step further to having a representation in every dimension? Even going beyond 4D, to 5D, 6D, an infinite amount of times? Also would there be such a thing as having no dimension, or is that a singularity?
PBS Spacetime:
*But this is tough material*
Me: Immediately gives up
Hahahahaha, that made me laugh out loud (because, I cover up my sadness with laughter :( #relatable )
Think I need to watch that again. Tried to concentrate but I think I understood less than 50% of it.
@@antonystringfellow5152 Same here!
Slartibartfast 42:
PBS Spacetime:
But this is tough material
Me: Immediately gives up
Me me:Immediately gives up
Me too but I'll be back. I believe that trying to learn things too complex for me makes it easier to assimilate easier concepts, but I had too much wine and beer in the last 6 hours for that to work.
PBS space videos always works for as treat to fell in sleep at night✌🏾
2-D surface that appears to the observer as 3-D. For God’s sake don’t let the flat earthers see this.
Now i get it how to prove earth is actually flat yaeeee 🙃
We can all agree that the earth at least appears round from Outerspace.
Well. If holographic principles is true, technically earth is flat.. lol
@@sapien153 it would be hilarious to tell the flat earthers that they were actually right all along... but surprise, not only the earth is flat, but everything else too 😅👌
Nope. There version of flat is not this version of flat. So now we have to take the fight to them and prove to them that earth is not flat. Its "flat"
Mad respect to those who can actually understand this video.
😂😂
After repeat viewings, and watching the recommended background videos, I think I get about 25% of it. But I'll gladly accept your respect in the spirit it was offered!
before I saw that episode I thought I was stupid - but I just overestimated myself...
This is so deep and complex it makes understandinf quantum mechanics child play
@Enter the Bragn’ you're not the one to say that, and even if it's wrong (and again, you're not the one who determine that), you need to appreciate the math and the logic behind it
@Enter the Bragn’ 😂😂 you made me laugh lol, Honestly, If the explanation of the universe is less complicated than this, I'd be doubtful of it, because the universe is complex in itself.
Enter the Bragn’ a very smart man will one day explain the universe in an essay and that’s as simple as it will get..
hahaha
Nice use of “The Game Of Life” as an illustration.
**At one point i noticed the expression on my face that i had...**
"The tension on my facial muscles was so high due the concentration and the huge effort that i was putting in of trying to understanding the sentences and the words that it was constructed from, plus trying to keep up with the next... and the next sentence.., then making more effort to glue them together and get somewhat a picture of what was been presented to me, or what i had to envision with this presentation/explanation that when i saw "bananas", i just ran out of RAM..."
**Quietly i hit the like button like a good boy...**
Jinxed When the screen suddenly went black I caught a mirror image of myself. What I saw was every muscle in my face going slack and my jaw hanging and my mouth gaping. I was breathing through my mouth and my eyes looked vacant. I feel a need to go dig a hole in the dirt.
(My thoughts, at the beginning: Great, now to understand this stuff...
My thoughts, at the end: When is he going to start explaining this stuff...)
Ditto
Who else is here after David Grusch testimony
Clear. Concise. Encompassing and sufficiently careful. Great stuff. This is he best one you have ever done! Wow.
The only question I'm left with is, "How could anyone understand all of this, well enough, to be able to come up with even more difficult questions to ask??"
@@vedantsridhar8378 "To learn and understand it." seems the logical answer.
@@Snipergoat1 well yeah but first try to understand it completely before commenting. And if you don't understand it, that's absolutely fine, but DON'T continuously keep commenting "I never understand what you are talking about." You know that if this Matt O Dowd sees only comments saying I didn't understand anything, then he will feel really bad, like his effort into simplifying is going waste. And while he clearly is a human being and to err is human, so he might not be so good in explaining, I really get pissed when I see only comments not supporting him.
@@vedantsridhar8378 I understood well enough it's just this is a learning video, we are here to learn. Sometimes people leave comments that come off as lame. Welcome to the internet. I think the spacetime crew is happy enough with another view and a comment. Two things that boost their rankings. I only get (lightly) irritated by comments that are malicious, dissuasive or willfully ignorant. Although this video has a lot more of those then most Spacetime vids, his was not. With the views on this video so high perhaps it attracted a bit more mainstream audience. This will naturally affect the tone of the comments. I guess I'm saying cut the guys some slack, we are all here to learn something. Save your venom for the jerks.
Math. You can conceptually simplify complex realities using math. That's why so much of new physics started as a way to get the math right. Like adding string length as a 4th dimension.
Exactly. If your BS is thick, who is going to call you out?
Every night I come out side, sit down in the nice utah summer night, smoke a joint and learn some crazy shit with this guy. Thank you 🙏🏿
this is by far the trippiest shit ever.
Sounds like heaven ;)...just not a Christian one
Anthony W whats not christian about it?
You should try eating a handful of mushrooms in a cold TN winter night, while sitting in a McDonalds parking lot and learning some crazy shit from this guy.
so what did you learn exactly? xD
Weyl Invariance is the most understandable explanation of multiple extra dimensions that I've ever heard and I've been interested in string theory and theoretical physics for over 10 years. Unbelieveable. I love this series.
The music makes me feel like I'm underground in a mario level
It reminds the music of some levels in an Asterix the Gaelic's snes game.
mc ride is such a handsome man
i never understand any shit on this channel, still like it though. I think it's soothing and often fall asleep by it.
You made me laugh because sometimes I start one of these videos just for the purpose to help me fall asleep :D
Lol. Though I watch these videos to actually understand them, not to sleep :D
So... you CAN judge a book by its cover?
Only if all of the contents of the book appear on the cover.
If it's been compressed so much that it's turned into a black hole, sure... Hope you like radiation with such a small black hole though 😙
@@fattyMcGee97 black hole with the mass of a book ? Haha, BOOOOM
William Smith when I was in 5th grade my teacher told me the same thing. Judge a book by its cover, usually the outside reflects what’s within.
nice one XD
This is one of the most difficult videos to understand but also the easiest videos to watch to wind down and fall asleep at night
i was so confused and then the bananas brought me back.
HAAHHAHA
This needs to be the comedy-comment he covers next episode.
Classic
yes thank god for the bananas, otherwise this would be completely over my head.
🤣👍
"If anyone feels like drawing Roger Penrose dressed as Gandalf with a lightsaber and a TARDIS, you would win the internet."
Actually quantum mechanics forbids this.
I want to say challenge accepted, but I suck at drawing 😥
I really want to take you up on this challenge.... But in all reality isn't Penrose, Gandalf and Yoda the same thing? And wouldnt that just make it all redundant anyway? Or am I just too lazy to draw right now lol.
Evidently a blogspot user called Peterscartoons has won the internet. We can all stop now.
He lost me after he said “We live in a universe...”
earth it s the center of universe !
Yeshua Immanuel Christ
🐟 05. THE PHENOMENAL UNIVERSE:
The fact that the external, phenomenal universe (“prakṛti”, in Sanskrit) of names and forms (“nāmarūpa”, in Sanskrit/Pali) exists solely within personal consciousness (and by extension, Universal Consciousness), is superlatively logical. If this material world actually existed as a separate reality, then obviously, it would have limits, because the nature of matter is that it has a measurable, three-dimensional finitude. Therefore, if one were to travel to the edge of the universe, there would need to be something WITHOUT the boundary of the universe (some other ’’universe’’, which contains this universe). This contradicts the very concept of a universe (literally, “turned into one”).
The late, great Professor Dr. Alan Watts’ response to the question: “where is the universe located?”, was: “nowhere and everywhere”.
This phenomenal manifestation is composed of space, time, energy, and matter, the latter of which comprises eight elemental groups - the five GROSS elements (“mahābhūta”, in Sanskrit), which are perceivable by at least one of the five senses, and the three SUBTLE elements (“tanmātra” or “atisūkṣma mātra”, in Sanskrit), which are symptomatic of localized consciousness.
N. B. Dark matter is not included in this system, as cosmological science has yet to determine its structural composition.
The five gross material elements and three subtle material elements are (from most gross to most subtle):
SOLIDS (AKA earth - “bhūmiḥ” or “pṛthivī”, in Sanskrit) are made of densely-packed atoms and molecules of a steady shape at room temperature.
LIQUIDS (AKA water - “jala” or “āpaḥ”, in Sanskrit) are composed of moderately dense molecules (usually including at least some water) of no fixed shape.
GAS (AKA air - “vāyuḥ” or “marut”, in Sanskrit) consists of rarefied atomic particles of no fixed shape.
HEAT (AKA fire - “analaḥ” or “tejas”, in Sanskrit) is made of kinetic energy (which may or may not appear visibly as fire, or at least heat waves).
ETHER (AKA space - “ākāśa” or “khaṃ”, in Sanskrit) is a vacuum consisting of three-dimensional space (length, breadth, and width). However, recent investigation has confirmed that empty space is actually filled with virtual particles (matter and antimatter). Thus, the explanation for the material universe being created from “nothing” (anti-matter) is plausible, according to quantum field theory.
MIND (“manaḥ”, in Sanskrit) is composed of sensual perceptions, instinctual thoughts, abstract images (including memories and fantasies), and emotions. Not all animal species possess a mind, but function purely on base instincts, originating from their genetic code, via a rudimentary nervous system.
INTELLECT (“buddhiḥ”, in Sanskrit) consists of conceptual thoughts. Only the very higher species of animal life possess an intellectual capacity.
PSEUDO-EGO (“ahaṃkāraḥ”, in Sanskrit) is comprised of the “I” thought (in this case, the illusory, ephemeral self-identity). Only humans possess the self-awareness necessary to question their own existence. Read Chapter 10 for a full elucidation of egoity.
Each of the FIVE gross material elements corresponds to one of the senses of the body. E.g. In outer space, where there is a vacuum (ether), one can detect light with the eyes, yet space is not tactile and cannot be smelled or tasted, nor can sound waves travel via space. At the opposite extreme, solid matter can be seen with the eyes, felt with the sense of touch, tasted with the tongue, smelt with the nose, and heard with the ear (when the solid matter is physically vibrated).
Beyond these eight material elements is the TRUE self - which pervades the entire body, and indeed, which is the Universal Self (“ayam ātmā brahma”, in Sanskrit). That explains why we say: “This is my body” or “I possess a mind”. Who is the owner of the body and the mind? It is us, the anti-matter, the inextinguishable authentic self/Self (“ātmana/Paramātmana”, in Sanskrit). Ultimately speaking, the Universal Self alone is.
HOWEVER, all eight elements are in fact “made” of Consciousness, since, as demonstrated previously, naught but Consciousness exists. Consciousness is the ultimate reality (“prajñānam brahma”, in Sanskrit). Just as a wedding ring is contingent on gold for its very existence, so too does the phenomenal universe depend entirely on ”Beingness” or “Isness”, Consciousness, and Blissful Awareness.
Although The Absolute cannot be verbally-described, (otherwise, it would be an OBJECT), as a concession to materialists, Infinite Consciousness has said to exhibit three innate attributes, known as “sacchidānanda”, a compounded Sanskrit epithet, consisting of the three words “sat”, “cit” and “ānanda” - Eternal Being(ness), Existence, or Truth; Conscious Knowledge; and Perfect Peace (often translated as “bliss”. However, the term “bliss” connotes an ephemeral experience of euphoria, whereas “peace” is the absence of any form of temporal suffering).
Because Absolutely Nothing (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit) is Infinite Creative Potentiality, ‘it’ actualizes as Absolutely Everything.
Attributeless Consciousness at Rest (in Sanskrit, “Nirguna Brahman”) manifests as this phenomenal universe (Consciousness in Action, or in Sanskrit, “Saguna Brahman”). In the verbiage of quantum physics, the enfolded implicate order ‘becomes’ the unfolded explicate order.
In REALITY there is no separation of anything at any time (assuming that Consciousness is a “thing”, and that time is an attribute of The Uncaused Absolute). That the total sum energy of the universe is zero, implies the non-existence of matter (i. e. no thing is objectively real).
The phenomenal manifestation is eternally cyclical, because ‘coming into existence’ implies ‘going out of existence’, just as ‘black’ implies the existence of ‘white’, or as ‘rich’ implies ‘poor’. Is it possible to have something without nothing? Obviously not, because the two go together, as interrelated opposites.
Similarly, despite what most believe, the outer-world is as much the Self as the inner-world. Where is the boundary of the human body? When we look at a person, we cannot see that person UNLESS we also see the background image. The two are inseparable, just as a flower and a bee cannot exist without the other. This fact alone is ample evidence that the universe is a holistic and wholistic system or entity.
You who are reading these words are that Totality of Existence, the Highest Universal Principle, the Essential Irreducible Self.
In common parlance, you are God (IF you only knew it!). Most of the greatest sages in history have spoken about either or both these concepts (of the Absolute Truth being either Absolutely Everything or Absolute Nothingness), such as the concept of “form is emptiness and emptiness is form” in Buddhism, or in Avatar Meher Baba's book “The Everything and the Nothing” (which is highly-recommended, particularly Chapters 51 to 56, which poetically describe the Ineffable One-without-a-second). Even an ordinary writer, American author Kurt Vonnegut, once penned: “Everything is nothing - with a twist”.
The Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics professor, Doctor Leonard Susskind's so-called “minus-first law of physics” states that information is INDESTRUCTIBLE. This is akin to the law of conservation of energy in classical physics, and proves that neither physical or psychic energy is lost. Read subsequent chapters to learn more about how this law relates to the notion of reincarnation, as well as to miraculous phenomena such as savant syndrome.
The planet on which we are residing consists of animate/organic life, as well as inanimate/inorganic matter.
The six stages of ORGANIC life are:
1. conception/birth
2. growth/development
3. maintenance
4. reproduction
5. ageing/deterioration
6. death
British polymath Thomas Young's famous double-slit experiment suggests that matter exists purely as potentiality or as a "possibility" until it is observed by a conscious being. This phenomenon, known as the wave-particle duality, is often discussed in advanced spiritual discourses, as it gives credence to the primacy of Consciousness. There are other aspects of the universe (e.g. the various philosophical approaches to the nature of ontological time, the accelerated expanding universe, holographic universe principle, quantum superposition, wave function, and quantum entanglement), as well as the possibility of life on other planets, the crop circle phenomenon, and the presence of the Fibonacci sequence in nature, which are beyond the scope of this document, and which do not directly relate to the most exigent thing in life (to find the unending peace/happiness which we humans are ULTIMATELY seeking).
“Find out who you REALLY are so that when death comes…there is no-one to kill, for while you are identified with your role, with your name, with your ego, there is someone to kill. But when you are identified with the whole universe, death finds you already annihilated and there’s no-one to kill”.
*************
“Just as you depend on the universe, so too does the universe depend on YOU.
Everything depends on everything else.”
Professor Alan W. Watts,
British-American Philosopher.
juradecanoa the moon is
*The World Teacher - Jagadguru Svāmī Vegānanda* I still have yet to search what you recommended- but, I would like to follow through. Thank you.
He lost me as soon as he said we, I'm by myself and I don't know the rest of the people watching so I got lost.
An astonishing good comprehensible, though deep explanation. Another hint of the holographic principle (similar to the Bekenstein entropy) is that the event horizon of a black hole is proportional to its mass and NOT proportional to the third root of its mass.
Another hint: If you took all the mass-energy of the observable universe, and compressed it to a point to create a black hole, the Schwarzschild radius of that black hole would be the cosmic event horizon.
If you didn't get any of this, you're still a human being.
Don’t say that!!
"Don't be alarmed. That indicates only, that you are still sane."
Human being, the lowest form of insult.
I’m actually a reptilian
and if you do? aha
You make all of this so much easier to conceptualize, appreciate it sir!
This probably one of the hardest episode in space time episode 🤪🤪🤪. Only 10 minutes in the video and i alr give up...
It's because science fiction is not always easy to understand. These assholes think they're being creative when drumming up this bullshit.
@@Mick0722MX IT SOUNDS LIKE IT TICKS YOU OFF WHEN YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND SOMETHING.
@@hiker919 I understand it perfectly, moron. That's why I'm criticizing it. What's your excuse?
I'm doing a project on black hole entropy for my thermodynamics course, and these videos have actually carried me so hard. Thanks!!!!!
This is the most developped flat earth theory
It's complete with weird suspenseful music and a line " ...or is it?"
@@boboblacksheep5003 Yes!! Even his t-shirt. So glad I read the comments, I'm getting less angry every comment.
This explains why I have been struggling in school ever since they introduced the z axis...🙄 It's just not native to our universe.
🧏🏽♀️
...The z axis is our universe
Do you know your comment is the most sensible in this lot?
@@muhaiminurrahman4288 yeah. I don't get the ignorance here. It doesn't take a genius to realize that our universe exists in forward to back, left to right, and up and down
@@thebboi3339 I was actually referring to @Who Dis?
Edit: However, yours is sensible too. I guess we are at that point in time where you can say anything about the universe and find subsequent theories to uphold your claim! Mad times these are!
Wow this channel makes me feel like a damn caveman
Like some sim
I am a fish.
Cavemen can make fire with their brains
@TROPICAL SUMMER IS COMING FOR THOSE WHO GET IT!!! dude, why are you shouting? Do you live on a planet where no one can be heard unless they shout over everyone else? Or are you just loud?
@@waynedarronwalls6468 🤣
A way to understand this is to think of it like vr. You have computer code that is 2 dimensional which appears to have depth (3 dimensions) when you put it on. In vr, things look 3 dimensional even though it’s made of 2d code
I understand every word of this.
Every word.
At least up to the first few seconds.
@Brian O'Kongkohr Aha! Ok, thank you for clearing this up!
I understood every word but once he assembled them into sentences I got lost.
Yes, I feel the same way.
I know what the individual words mean, and that's where it ends.
I think it's a pronunciation issue.
I understand every word... if I analyze them separately, and not as being part of a multi...verse.
Nobody:
PBS: An abstract mathematical surface, infinitely far from our location and from our intuition. Projecting inwards our familiar holographic space time.
5:31 But, we're gonna add something weird...
me: .... aha, finally!
I can't stop laughing. Right on buddy!
I find it amazing that so many of us are so fascinated with something we can’t comprehend. Well, not yet that is. Love this!
I get so excited that I have to pause the video every now and then to calm down
"Now that you've mastered driving the M808V, let's move on to some safety features."
...
"No! No, wait! Go back! Why are there six pedals if there are only four directions?"
"I knew you could pick up chicks in a tank."
I watched all the vids leading up to this one by one as many times as it took for me to fully understand them. Now I can understand this and I'm so glad. Awesome stuff thanks for the series
@Yeshua Immanuel Christ Sure, can you send me the book?
The only thing i can say is: AWESOME. What a great video. Thank you and your staff for simplify these theories for us.
Ok, I will need to rewatch this one.
... a thousand times or until my brain explodes, whatever happens first.
10th time watching this video, finally got all he ih saing until 1:28 . I'll keep re-watching
I love watching videos about the universe. But sadly I can only absorb 1% lol
That graphic of the compact layers connecting the strings was 🔥
tl;dw: it's the inverse of Plato's Allegory of the Cave. The shadows on the wall are creating the people walking in front of the light source.
I mean, the quantum eraser experiment already demonstrated this. :^)
I feel like someone is slapping my brain while watching and trying to understand this.
Don't worry. That's how it started for most of us, but with enough videos you start to understand more and more.
Except for string theory of course. If you think you understand string theory, you do not understand string theory xD
@The Jim Reaper™ If the universe is holographic, it always was holographic so there is no aparent difference for us.
The only real change would be our understanding of fundamentals of our universe, which would allow us to create new technology that could make life better (or end it.. whatever the intention is).
But we do not really know how these would look like yet. It'd just be a new chapter in science.
LOL!!!! Not just me then.
@@liquidminds just like most foundational physics, I don't think this will have any repercussions for technology (except indirectly in the development of test equipment or faster computers). Stuff like this is much more important than just progressing technology anyway- this is what progression in technology and mathematics is FOR.
liquidminds nah those string theory videos had me fucked up for a full week
Please do a video in depth explation of the 1st black hole photo
Event Horizon project was made, bunch of dudes said, "Let's photo a blackhole!", M87's SM Blackhole happened to have a cloud of gas in its vicinity, gas fell into the blackhole, gas orbited the blackhole which caused it to heat up and glow, glowing gas shows the "shadow" of the blackhole, and Event Horizon project takes the image. Nerds (including myself) everywhere have an orgasm.
@@FirstLast-zv5od everyone here knows that. We want to know how?
Dirk from Veritasium has made 2 very good videos explaining it.
@@Nilguiri Good videos but many questions remain. Is there a singularity? Or are black holes fuzzy (string theory) balls of strings jammed together? As an object falls towards a black hole and is accelerated to light speed (almost) where does its kinetic energy come from? Is spacetime itself sucked into a black hole? What about dark matter?
Agreed :)
This video is special, he explained such a mind-boggling concept, so well, that even a layman like me can follow
I was halfway through this before I realised my mouth was hanging open.
To say this is tough stuff is an understatement. Here is my advice:
1. Watch this thing on repeat until it clicks. or...
2. Put the playback speed at .75 or even .5
At ~ one minute in, I paraphrase: "The concept of a holographic universe is complex, and over past few months, we've built up to it with the following six videos. You might want to go watch those first, in order, before watching this one".
My response: Watch this one, then the immediately preceding one, back up to the original, in reverse order.
My recommendation: Don't be an idiot! That is NOT the right way to do it. You're probably a lot more sensible than I and don't need to be told that, but just in case: Start at the beginning, and move forwards towards this. They're interesting, well-done, and help enrich understanding once you DO get to this one.
I always enjoy watching these videos on lsd
2 minutes in i just give up. I can’t relate, just gonna watch it still. 🤣🤣
But kudos for using Conway's Game of Life as an example of a quantum field theory at 4:25. :-)
Everyone talking about M87 black hole
PBS Space Time : holographic universe
Dr Becky incomming. (I think)
This is theoretical physics. M87 is Black Hole Engineering with the Black hole showing us all it’s sides at once.
SpaceTime isn't boring us with press releases!
I believe black holes were already covered.
They will probably do a journal club on in about a month and a half.
If someone is monitoring the holographic projection they might be alarmed by my set of brain pixels trying to comprehend this video
Matt - this was very well done, I enjoyed it immensely.
Long ago, when I was receiving training in hyperspace mathematics (which is now beyond my abiliy, due to both severe head injury as well as the passage of decades), I was of the firm opinion that a degree of freedom and a dimension were one and the same thing - all that differs is your application of the math. Likewise Prof. Witten's work shows that five very different systems of string mathematics represent an identity of structure - they are alternate views of the same structure. I find this sort of thing is not rare in physics or mathemetics (which after all, is the fundamental language of physics) hence -
I'm sorry to hear about your injury. :(
I've recently been considering "time" to be yet another dimension of space, simply pinpointing the location of an object along its worldline. To your understanding, would this be an accurate assessment at all? Or completely false due to the maths?
@@christianyaerger1751 Yes, that would be an accurate assessment. An object's address requires x,y,z and its location in time. Else you will not find the object. On a graph, math treats time just like any other dimension. Physics also treats time like other dimensions, the laws of physics work as well with time reversed.
A difference though - is that our minds experience time as a constrained dimension - the constraint being our sense of experience can move only in one direction. This is very much like the constraint experienced on the vertical axis when an object descends below the event horizon of a black hole. It is fun to consider what happens to the time axis under those circumstances (and why).
Why do we know that we don't live in an ADS space? Wouldn't hyperbolic spatial curvature make far away galaxies appear to accelerate, just like dark energy does?
kawikapful ads is negatively curved, our universe is flat from calculations.
@@amartya-w3i Thanks for engaging. I noticed the calculation from the CMB argument later, when I did some google searching. Still though, it seems odd that the CMB shows a flat universe while far away galaxies are accelerating away from us faster and faster, like they are falling off a far away curve in spacetime.
We could maybe explain both if it turned out that we just weren't thinking about the way that the expansion of space interacted with the CMB correctly. It is more likely that I just don't understand though.
@@amartya-w3i who cares about calculus. The question was about reality, which can only be measured. Currently, the Universe appears to be flat, but we have only measured down to about the 0.4% level. To actually test the curvature we need distances hundreds times larger than the observable Universe.
@@amartya-w3i is there no way it could exist without negative curvature?
9:50 Complicated? Before Maldecena, string theory is a real no-brane'r
Get out.
lol good one
I don’t know what emotion this is but this is a good comment
Dude the music is absolutely amazing , mind blown
This channel and content is invaluable to humanity! Thank you, Matt and Team!
I need to refresh my physics knowledge before watching this video.
black holes are texture glitches in the matrix, got it.
Thank you
@Poorna Chandra 😀😂😅
Rebooting...
ETA of update download - 13.5 billion years
This hurts my head.... but I cant get enough of it! I love the pain of enlightenment.
“Yog-Sothoth knows the gate. Yog-Sothoth is the gate. Yog-Sothoth is the key and guardian of the gate. Past, present, future, all are one in Yog-Sothoth. He knows where the Old Ones broke through of old, and where They shall break through again. He knows where They have trod earth's fields, and where They still tread them, and why no one can behold Them as They tread.”
:p
Sounds like something my lovemate would say lol
holographic universe and computer codes in string theory mean that the Matrix may not be that far off
Probably gonna be more like a Weyl tensor than a matrix. Matrices are actually pretty dull.
Yeah, "totally" understand this. No problem whatsoever 👌
(watched till the end anyway)
Guys doing the animations here, editing and music have great skills.