Thank you for your feedback! At first glance, fewer moving parts may seem to imply less friction, but this is not always the case. Friction depends on contact surfaces, materials used, and lubrication. The slider-crank mechanism provides high efficiency due to its widespread use and optimization. The scotch yoke mechanism, with fewer contact surfaces, may be more suitable for certain applications. Minimizing friction in both mechanisms requires proper material selection and lubrication.
@@user-bl6cv1fc7u First of all, thank you very much for your feedback🎉🎉. The slider crank mechanism is generally more efficient and durable compared to the Scotch yoke mechanism. While the Scotch yoke's simpler design can reduce friction losses, it often results in a sinusoidal velocity profile that may introduce speed fluctuations. In contrast, the slider crank mechanism offers a more stable speed profile, making it more suitable for a wide range of applications and higher loads. Additionally, the slider crank mechanism's robust construction typically results in greater durability, especially under continuous operation and heavy load conditions.
A Scotch-Yoke is good for compact devices that don't experience a whole lot of force on the yoke side. For high-force applications, though, the yoke will slowly wear away due to friction - hence why almost all internal combustion engines go with the crankshaft approach.
Scotch Yoke resolves the secondary imbalance problem, however it's has a bigger problem with friction. I like them both
Ladies be drooling because of these
NAWWWW
Pareciera que el 2 tiene más rango de fricción pero no es así menos piezas móviles siempre es reducion de material
Thank you for your feedback! At first glance, fewer moving parts may seem to imply less friction, but this is not always the case. Friction depends on contact surfaces, materials used, and lubrication. The slider-crank mechanism provides high efficiency due to its widespread use and optimization. The scotch yoke mechanism, with fewer contact surfaces, may be more suitable for certain applications. Minimizing friction in both mechanisms requires proper material selection and lubrication.
So which one is more efficient and durable
@@user-bl6cv1fc7u First of all, thank you very much for your feedback🎉🎉. The slider crank mechanism is generally more efficient and durable compared to the Scotch yoke mechanism. While the Scotch yoke's simpler design can reduce friction losses, it often results in a sinusoidal velocity profile that may introduce speed fluctuations. In contrast, the slider crank mechanism offers a more stable speed profile, making it more suitable for a wide range of applications and higher loads. Additionally, the slider crank mechanism's robust construction typically results in greater durability, especially under continuous operation and heavy load conditions.
Obscene.
👍
Why scotch yoke mechanism is called non slider?? There is sliding components in both sub part also...🤔🤔🤔🤔
Which is better?
Thanks for your comment🎉 . Depends on where it's used. But I guess the commonly used slider crank mechanism.
Scotch yoke. Cause double acting. Sooth fxn at hole bearing
@@tklearning4428not all scotch yoke mechanisms are double sided.
A Scotch-Yoke is good for compact devices that don't experience a whole lot of force on the yoke side. For high-force applications, though, the yoke will slowly wear away due to friction - hence why almost all internal combustion engines go with the crankshaft approach.
Thank you for your information and comment.@@seagullman87
I wish that was me