And for the most part all Boeing can do is redraft and reconfigure a plane that came out in 1967.... 737-100, 737-200, 737-300, 737-400, 737-500, 737-600, 737-700, 737-800, 737-900, 737 max 7, 737 max 8, 737 max 9, 737 max 10.....
Hydrogen was thoroughly examined, designed, tested - that work needs to be reviewed before even trying hydrogen - lessons learned! Hydrogen takes more energy to produce than it provides. Carbon fuels have the highest energy release than other fuels. Meantime, wing-body designs have many issues including handling qualities which have also been tested and found unacceptable for passengers.
Hydrogen is technology with issues of storage. Due to storage problems this technology is FALLS alike EV's - great on paper and in LAB but in REALITY / PRACTICE will STAY BEHIND and eventually loose money. There is a path to continue of traditional fuels in modern stage, but it requires new materials withstanding over 2000 degree of Celsius .
Clickbait. Everyone knows the next plane will be a 350F. And their current project around sustainable fuel concerns the double propelled engine. Not hydrogen.
A Blended Wing-Body has several Fatal Flaws: 1. Passenger ride quality. 2. Passenger emergency evacuation. 3. Gear up landing. 4. Engine fire. 5. Engine fan burst. 5. Engine turbine burst. 6. Ditching.
Follow Antonov Bureau dis-attached fuselage for emergency ...
And for the most part all Boeing can do is redraft and reconfigure a plane that came out in 1967.... 737-100, 737-200, 737-300, 737-400, 737-500, 737-600, 737-700, 737-800, 737-900, 737 max 7, 737 max 8, 737 max 9, 737 max 10.....
a very bold statement for this simple report!
Regardless of what this narrator states, Airbus is the end of Boeing as they are way ahead in capturing the airline market and resolving issues.
Hydrogen was thoroughly examined, designed, tested - that work needs to be reviewed before even trying hydrogen - lessons learned! Hydrogen takes more energy to produce than it provides. Carbon fuels have the highest energy release than other fuels. Meantime, wing-body designs have many issues including handling qualities which have also been tested and found unacceptable for passengers.
Hydrogen is technology with issues of storage. Due to storage problems this technology is FALLS alike EV's - great on paper and in LAB but in REALITY / PRACTICE will STAY BEHIND and eventually loose money.
There is a path to continue of traditional fuels in modern stage, but it requires new materials withstanding over 2000 degree of Celsius .
Clickbait. Everyone knows the next plane will be a 350F. And their current project around sustainable fuel concerns the double propelled engine. Not hydrogen.
Derby, UK: pronounced, DARBY. 🙄😖
Gallons and liters mix up, again.
Hydrogen will always be a dangerous and expensive fuel ro use. A nuclear power source would be a far safer and economical powerplant.
Nucléaire requires a shield, that is very heavy, it won’t work.
Why do you call yourself "Aviatrix" when you're a dude?