Airbus' Next Aircraft Will END Boeing & Just Shocked Everyone! Here's Why

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 дек 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @engineeringoyster6243
    @engineeringoyster6243 День назад +1

    A Blended Wing-Body has several Fatal Flaws: 1. Passenger ride quality. 2. Passenger emergency evacuation. 3. Gear up landing. 4. Engine fire. 5. Engine fan burst. 5. Engine turbine burst. 6. Ditching.

    • @nupagadii5834
      @nupagadii5834 День назад

      Follow Antonov Bureau dis-attached fuselage for emergency ...

  • @pablolugo2615
    @pablolugo2615 День назад +1

    And for the most part all Boeing can do is redraft and reconfigure a plane that came out in 1967.... 737-100, 737-200, 737-300, 737-400, 737-500, 737-600, 737-700, 737-800, 737-900, 737 max 7, 737 max 8, 737 max 9, 737 max 10.....

  • @tuanpham-vv3qj
    @tuanpham-vv3qj День назад

    a very bold statement for this simple report!

  • @theresacaron4238
    @theresacaron4238 День назад

    Regardless of what this narrator states, Airbus is the end of Boeing as they are way ahead in capturing the airline market and resolving issues.

  • @baxtermullins1842
    @baxtermullins1842 День назад

    Hydrogen was thoroughly examined, designed, tested - that work needs to be reviewed before even trying hydrogen - lessons learned! Hydrogen takes more energy to produce than it provides. Carbon fuels have the highest energy release than other fuels. Meantime, wing-body designs have many issues including handling qualities which have also been tested and found unacceptable for passengers.

  • @nupagadii5834
    @nupagadii5834 День назад

    Hydrogen is technology with issues of storage. Due to storage problems this technology is FALLS alike EV's - great on paper and in LAB but in REALITY / PRACTICE will STAY BEHIND and eventually loose money.
    There is a path to continue of traditional fuels in modern stage, but it requires new materials withstanding over 2000 degree of Celsius .

  • @Dirk-van-den-Berg
    @Dirk-van-den-Berg День назад

    Clickbait. Everyone knows the next plane will be a 350F. And their current project around sustainable fuel concerns the double propelled engine. Not hydrogen.

  • @AndrewLumsden
    @AndrewLumsden 16 часов назад

    Derby, UK: pronounced, DARBY. 🙄😖

  • @michaelreeves8164
    @michaelreeves8164 2 дня назад +3

    Gallons and liters mix up, again.

  • @richardhowell1624
    @richardhowell1624 2 дня назад +5

    Hydrogen will always be a dangerous and expensive fuel ro use. A nuclear power source would be a far safer and economical powerplant.

    • @jeanvaljean9293
      @jeanvaljean9293 День назад

      Nucléaire requires a shield, that is very heavy, it won’t work.

  • @pef1960
    @pef1960 13 часов назад

    Why do you call yourself "Aviatrix" when you're a dude?