Engine FALLS OFF Russian Jet Moments Before Crash. Multiple Angles
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 мар 2024
- A Russian military transport plane with 15 people on board has crashed shortly after take-off, with dramatic video showing its engine in flames.
The Il-76 cargo plane crashed in Russia's Ivanovo region, the country's defense ministry confirmed.
patreon.com/maximusaviation74...
#russia #Russianplanecrash #planecrashes #aviation
Support The Channel Buy Me A Coffee
www.buymeacoffee.com/maximusa...
Maximus Merch
Hats, Mugs, Hoodies, and T-shirts
teespring.com/stores/maximus-...
Premium Polo Shirts, Mugs, Phone Cases, and more
shop.spreadshirt.com/maximus-...
For Business Inquiries Email: aviationmaximus@gmail.com
Copyright Disclaimer. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
The engine did not depart the plane, it was on a special mission. The mission was a total success. 🙃
your brain is a special mission
@@briancarno8837 No, that's a suicide mission. Absolutely nothing to salvage there 😆
Is Boeing delivering aircraft to Russia?🙄
I knew when i watched i'd see a boeing reference somewhere in the comments
@@johnvanzoest45321 boeing comment 32 "special mission" comments
Wellll, it looks like it was produced in the sixties too 😂
Nothing to see here, we are just testing our new engine disconnect missile decoy system...
Takes losing an engine to a whole new meaning
"Don't worry, it'll turn up" -- Foster Brooks
_"Blyat!!!"_
Never a good outcome when flaming engines fall off.
Well, at least we know it wasn’t Boeing’s fault this time. Right? Hopefully? 😮
Only time will tell.
Maybe our government is sneaking Boeing engineers and plant workers into the Russian aviation industry. "OK boys, when you get over there, don't tighten ANY bolts!"
In Russia, planes strong like bull and engines, fall like rock...
😆
I suspect it damages the hydraulic system when it tore away from the wing.
planes have special bolts so that in the event of the enginr going on fire they break
No they don't. They are called fuse pins and they allow the engine to break away if to much stress is placed on the bolts. They have nothing to do with fire. @@briancarno8837
Oh shitski
There are some great replies on this video, but yours is the BEST!!!!!
Not an optical Ilyushin, sadly. RIP 😥
Looks like a missile strike. Looks like it took out the hydraulics too. Loss of control.
I believe it happened far from the war zone. So more likely an (uncontained) engine failure.
…or the departing engine and fire damaged the wing, leading slats, flaps, reducing lift capability, which lead to a stall of that wing as it reduced speed in preparation for landing.
Putin will claim it was 737Max
Despite the fact that no Russian carrier is flying the MAX at the moment...
Explaining the early release version. May have damaged control surfaces.
The jet had 3 engines left, so why would it crash? Maybe pilots weren't trained for such an incident and panicked or some controls were lost when engine tore off. Low altitude didn't give any time to do much?? Hope some survived. Thanks Maximus
Looked like an out of control fire that could have impacted the integrity of the wing. The smoke plume did not leave much hope for any survivors.
I am thinking that when the engine departed the wing, it may have ripped several hydraulic lines, thus causing the aircraft to lose control. With the obvious lack of altitude, there may have been little the pilots could do at that point. I also agree that the fire on the wing looked pretty catastrophic. Very similar to the Chicago O'Hare crash in 1979.
A jet engine that size weighs a number of tonnes..If it departs from its mounting pylon the plane becomes unbalanced in its roll axis as the opposite heavier wing swings down..The pilots would have needed full aileron to compensate to keep the wings level..Now with little chance of banking the airplane and flying basically straight..this too will add to its final affliction..
Whoever the pilots were working for there's no need to gloat over a crash they were only doing their job
Stupid moronic comments
Looked like two smoke trails, just as the plane disappears behind the house, so maybe both right-hand engines were _experiencing anomalies?_ AKA Shrapnel.
Should we ask Boeing what happened ?
I wouldn't... Boeing can't even sort out their own crap and, they're not in the middle of a war.
Not an engine, it's obviously just a cigarette that fell off the plane and it caused a small fire ;)
What's horrifying, is tha it reminds of a crash that happened in Chicago, Illinois on May 25,1979. A McDonnell Douglas DC-10, taking off from O'hare airport, lost an engine and crashed in a field not too far from the runway. In total, 273 people died. I was 14 when it happened and 45 years later, the picture of the plane rolling over on it's side before crashing in a ball of flame, is still haunting.😱😕The investigation revealed, that the airline was using substandard maintenance procedures that damaged the pylon holding the engine onto the wing.
When you say “sub standard maintenance procedures “, is that the crash caused because they were using a forklift truck or something to line up the engine with the pilon?
@@kw8757yes. They used a forklift. But the forklift isn’t why it came off. They took the engine off for maintenance using the wrong sets of bolts. They were damaged and worn from not using the correct procedure. They finally cracked and the engine shot forward and up and over then behind the wing. It tore out the hydraulics and the flaps and slats retracted causing a roll
@BB-xx3dv It tore out the hydrolic lines to the wing control surfaces, the ailerons and NO control why it rolled over !!!
@@grumpy3543 Thanks, I remember seeing a program about it, but couldn't remember the details.
@@kw8757it was to save time (and off course) money a departure from the proper procedure to change an engine
_SUKA BLYAAAAAT!!_
Sparsiba 😅
That Il-76 thinks he can replicate American Airlines 191, El Al 1862 and Trans-Air Service 671
All you people making smart comments about Russia. Like the crap we are making in the US is any better.
And you thought United maintenance was bad!
From the second video, it's apparent there was more damage than just the outboard engine. Fuel is streaming from the wing root area and several large holes can be seen aflame.
Looks like an uncontained engine failure which caused significant damage to the wing and likely fuselage in addition to the burning engine.
Catastrophic uncontained failure seems less likely than a missile strike.
@@Yaivenov Not really, just after take off would have the guy with the missile standing at the end of the runway deep inside Russia... more likely the engine failed.
The Russians are saying bird strike.
That's a lot of damage, engine, wing etc for a bird. Possible but?
@@jcwoodman5285 maybe if it happened anywhere not near Ukraine.
@@jcwoodman5285 These are not modern western engines with containment measures. They are screaming low bypass engines from the 1980's.
The Ilyushin IL-76 Max
I like the "I been busy" clip from the movie "48 Hours" better. 😁
It was just a Special Engine Delivery mission. Very successful. The biggest, most beautiful, hugest engine delivery ever.
The engine was heard saying "I'm too young to die for Putin" so-
It decided to land, regardless of what the Pilot was telling it to do.
Not an aviation specialist - but by the symptoms appears to be Boeing. 😂
Very happy I wasn't on that aircraft. That had to be an awful feeling.
I'm no expert on these things, but I'm pretty sure that is not supposed to happen!
CoP: Captain, we've lost #4 engine
P: what do you mean, Dixon? Be specific! Flameout? Loss of oil pressure? Compressor speed? What?
CoP: It's all of those captain. #4 has departed the aircraft.
prayers
Did not realize that Boeing made planes for the Russian Air Force.
A lot of clever Boeing references here, but with some truth- the Tupolev TU-4 was a Soviet copy of a Boeing B-29, continuing the fine tradition of greatest Soviet designer U. S. Patoff.
The engine saw a vodka factory and wanted a drink quickly. Common in Russia
The same thing has happened to a Boeing DC10 aircraft. American Airlines flight 191. The engine rips off important parts on the wing, resulting in loss of control.
This happened before Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas. There’s a Mayday episode about it showing it happened due to a shortcut method by maintenance re-installing the engine to the pylon.
@@mako88sbAnd you think this Russian aircraft did not also take shortcuts? A Boeing 747 also crashed after it lost 2 engines, so it's not just Russian aircraft that crash when engines fall off. It's mostly maintenace that cause these crashes.
The crash in Chicago happened long before the Boeing merger. At that time, it was McDonnell Douglas. The DC-10 was not a Boeing aircraft but it seems like the company is determined to make the 737 Max, their version of that infamous plane.
@@mako88sbOops yes not boeing DC10 my mistake but the 747 certainly was
@@gregb1599 Yes. You’re right about the 747. I had forgotten about that one.
Don’t be surprised if Boeing blamed John Barnett
Was it serviced in San Francisco?
Notice the vapor coming from the fuselage or near the wing root? So was this an uncontained failure leading to more damage, or maybe the result of a missile doing more damage? If they weren't waging war on Ukraine I'd assume the uncontained failure took out something major in the hydraulics and they bled to death.
+cageordie I was thinking that they are dumping fuel to lighten the plane.
Well there's ya problem...
Perhaps they couldn’t get the necessary spare parts or the technicians for maintenance.
Who's pissed off Mr Putin this time??
did they run outve flares or what
As Jaun Brown would say" KABLAMO"
In Russia, engine leave plane, plane leave engine.
What happens when you go with cut-rate maintenance.
I think they were using a Boeing MAX in-flight weight reduction technique 🤔 😳 🤣
a Boeing knock off?
both designed in 1960
So a boeing.
Looks more like a Lockheed C-141 knock off.
@@Atite_LometenIt's not a Boeing jet. This was an Ilyushin IL-76. Compare that with the Lockheed C-141 and Boeing C-17.
I didn't know Boeing sold aircraft to Russia.
Some boeing black legs been doing some sneaky work on the side ... how else do you explain 'something' just falling off?
so which military personnel were on that jet that putin didn't like anymore?
I didn't know Bowing Co. supplies Russia too
No. It's only Donald Trump who bows to Putin.
It's a special engine operation.
Engine failure to the max 😮😐
Boeing would like to have a word
@@flightmaster999 Boeing has it's own troubles to dig itself from
Just like their war against Japan pre Japanese empire... if you get potato farmers and force them to do technical tasks outside of their fields. This is what you get...
The plane is definitely a 737 Max and Boeing must be blamed
But how does this incident relate to Boeing?
Russian mechanical safety... Every jet comes with four engines, so you have three left when one falls off.
At least they aren't that stupid just to forget some bolts
Well.......um......it's Russian. That might have something to do with that. They were probably doing an in-flight check of the door plug.......and whoooooooosh......an engine falls off.
I have great feelings for the folks on the "plane" as well as families with such a great loss. 😒
Ilyushin is the russian Boening?
Not Boening Bonehead it's Boeing😅
That is a standard feature on russian aircraft.
Back in the 90’s a friend worked in the travel department of The World Bank prior to the collapse of the USSR. Part of her job was using ALL airlines to evaluate travel resources for the VIPs traveling on World Bank business. When the Aeroflot flight she boarded from Moscow to St. Petersburg had people bringing their goats and chickens on board, she recommended that the WB use private aircraft….
Trying to keep up with Boeing
Was it a Boeing?
No, it was an Ilyushin Il-76, made by Russians (technically Soviets)
@@EuropeanRailfanAltYou're right. This was an Ilyushin IL-76. The IL-76 has a similar high-wing and T-tail design as the C-17 Globemaster, C-141 Starlifter, and C-5 Galaxy.
Satisfying video.
Before us westerners gloat too much, several times engines have fallen off Boeings and others. Even more than one engine. I don't see it as a reason for joking. It is a crash, people get hurt, even die - but some find that funny and the cause for levity. Says more about us than them.
Had to do some research.
This is two videos made into one.
The 1st one IDK and may be from this week.
The 2nd one through of the "crash" which doesnt even show the crash just smoke is from a military transport plane that the Ukrainians shot down months back.
Not sure where anyone is getting this "bird strike" report from Russia since I can't find shit about it anywhere.
Or that it wasn't near the Ukraine war zone.
There is zero info I xan find on what caused it or where it was.
For all we know there was no crash and yhe plane landed fine.
Since it's clearly the shot of the transport crashes smoke zoomed in in the last clip.
Must of been the other Russian presidential candidates
Did it crash or did i just spend two worthless minutes .
Was kinda wondering why something like this hasn’t happened yet. I mean Russia hasn’t gotten new plane parts since they went to war with Ukraine, right?
This was a Russian-built Ilyushin-76. Russia is the parts maker for this airplane.
Not sure about older Russian aircraft, but the modern ones made in Russia contain more western parts than actual Russian made parts. We know the engines were Russian made, but again possibly many of the engines parts are from western companies.
Another Boeing ????
This is a very old video, I don't remember what year this took place. From memory, I think this was a military plane during some testing which is why there are 2-3 different angles of this crash.
Guess it’s a Boeing
Wasn't this plane made by Boeing? LOL
It's not. This was an Ilyushin IL-76.
@@angelorobel12 then probably on Boeing's licence LOL
LOL 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Condolences to the families and loved ones of those lives tragically lost. This jingoistic accompanying music and sketch seem very inappropriate and condescending when considering the tragic loss of life. Respect for fellow aviators, crew, and passengers, along with their families needs to be observed and respected in all cases of aviation disasters.
Thank you for your comment. Well said. I was beginning to lose hope in humanity.
Apparently this crash of an Il-76 occurred 3/12/24 in the Ivanavo region. 15 people were onboard the military transport.
0:11 How do you film on a Russian potato?
Boeingshevik
Boeingski.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Boeingsky.
Looks like losing an engine was the least of the pilot's problems. He still had three other engines to land safely with, but still crashed, mostly likely because the plane had been badly serviced. Typical for Russia.
Was the plane manufactured by Boeing?
...anyone blamed Trump yet?
I'm surprised the media hasn't blamed this on Boeing! 🤦🏻♂
For once it's not Trump. His only skill is at going bankrupt.
A Boeing?
Made by the Russian Ilyushin, it's one of the domestic companies that build military/commercial jets
Seems like a catastrophic engine failure but the Ilyushin has 4 engines so it can fly normally with only 3 engines, the pilot is trained for such emergencies. I hope nobody got hurt
Huh. I didn't know Russia had Boeing products.
The Ilyushin IL-76 is not a Boeing product.
Holy c**p! At least they have an excuse. It's made in Russia!
I love your sense of humour, keep up the good work.
Russian DEI people i see working hard.
Dang what boeing was that. Oh wait it's some cheap junk Russian lada plane. Eh who cares they're both the same trash.
Looks like CGI
Nice!
The engine just missed putins house!
Sadly...
On February 4, 2023, the engine of a Russian charter plane operated by Azur Air caught fire before takeoff from Phuket International Airport, forcing the pilot to abort the flight. The plane was a 26-year-old Boeing 767-306ER carrying 309 passengers and 12 crew members. The pilot reportedly blew the right engine, causing smoke to be spotted by air traffic contro
Totally not the same plane here. Google that model, and you’ll see it’s not even visually the same design at all.
This is obviously also not filmed in Phuket International. 😆