DNA Results for Queen Elizabeth II Predicted
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 янв 2020
- Alfred the Great to Queen Elizabeth II:
• [Old Version] British ...
Vlad the Impaler to Queen Elizabeth II:
• Is Queen Elizabeth Rel...
Primary Source:
www.wargs.com/essays/ethnic.html
CREDITS:
Chart/Narration: Matt Baker
Editing: @JackRackam
Intro animation: @AlMuqaddimahYT
Intro music: "Lord of the Land" by Kevin MacLeod and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0. Available from incompetech.com
European Royal Family Tree poster:
usefulcharts.com/products/european-royal-family-tree
Elizabeth II was NOT the 'Queen of England'!!! She was the Queen of the UNITED KINGDOM of Great Britain and Northern Ireland!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Got it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@UsefulCharts This prediction and the wild shifts in ancestry percentages from parent to offspring reflect RECENT ANCESTRY (2-3 recent generations) results, which are quite different from the ENTIRE ancestral line. The ancestral line percentages- which is what 23 and Me displays - will change only incrementally in 2-3 generations with 100+ generation ancestry timelines in view. This is a clarification for those who are wondering.
Is the queen related to Gaius Julius Ceasar? The Romans conquered almost all the germania royal houses. Much bloodshed was spilled in Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, France, Spain, Ireland.
UsefulCharts: "Every generation that we go back, the number of ancestors doubles"
Royal Families: laughs in incest
Yuna Tuna oh shit 🤭😂🤣
You'd think, right? But the real inbreeding was among the Catholic monarchs (like Spain), because there were so few of them and they never married from outside their little group. The 5682378 tiny little postage-stamp German duchies made this much less of an issue in Protestant northern Europe. If you want to see inbreeding in the north you have to look at the rural poor.
@TheRenaissanceman65 A lot of them aren't committing incest per se, but royals seem to marry 2nd or 3rd cousins more often than not. A product of constantly marrying foreign royals is that even in the north, there are only so many royal houses. It was pretty rare to not need to petition the pope for a dispensation to marry a relative, which was required if they were closer than I believe 5th cousins.
Certainly, most people living in your country, even many in the aristocracy, were less closely related than many/most royal houses...
Jesus man
More like hapsburgs
Most people tend to forget that the Queen is half Scottish from her mother.
Yep and her mother and her husband George VI (despite having a German lineage) are both descended from King Robert the Bruce of Scotland, through James I (VI of Scotland). His daughter married the elector of Hanover and this lead to George I after the Stuart lineage died out with death of Queen Anne.
Queen Victoria and Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg were cousins from Hanover lineage and also descendants of James I. So The Queen is direct from Robert the Bruce and Henry VII (whose eldest daughter married a Scottish king) from both lineages.
Actually, the queen mum was half French as her mother was a cook.
The asiatic Lion Don't forget HM also has Stuart blood.
David Black l
Good to know
When you realize, when Queen Victoria died, The Monarchs of Germany, UK, Russia, Spain, Greece, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway lost their *Grandmother!* Accuracy 3/10 by "Stefan Pieper"
How?
@@afex1070 She was their grandmother.
@@afex1070 she had a lot of daughters whom she married off to the other European monarchs...
some people say that if she was still alive by the time of WW1 she would've scolded her grandchildren King George V, Kaiser Wilhelm II and Tzar Nicholas II into not going to war but I don't know.
It's still nice to imagine three heads of states being berated by their grandmother for going to war
@The Outcast Contrary to popular belief, Czar Nicholas was NOT a grandson of Victoria. He was cousin to George V, but not through Victoria, and Wilhelm II was his third degree uncle. HOWEVER Nicholas wife WAS indeed a granddaughter of Victoria. So they were still his cousins in-law, if that term exists.
Same for Spain. King (Alfonso VIII) wasnt a grandson of Victoria, but his wife was a granddaughter.
The Kings of Greece, Denmark, Sweden and Norway (the last two being the same person) werent grandsons of Victoria, period.
Unfortunatly I have to give you a 3/10 for accuracy.
@@stefanpieper3757 True 3/10
Almost every royal family is related to German families.
For example, the Dutch royal family is almost 100% German and is in no way truly related to the Dutch people but instead the German.
the dutch people istself is related to the Germans, in fact it's basically an offspring.
CrazyTraffic Yes of course, it is because the Germans, English, Dutch and way more countries (maybe some Danes) are all descent from the Germanic tribes that used to live here around two thousand years ago.
elvis so our royal family IS Dutch! Hah!
Alberts Choise No, that’s not what I am saying.
elvis no you are. I assumed it so I’m right
I’m also direct descendant of William the Conquerer. How do I press my claim?
sup cousin
Sup cousins
Hello Cousins. :)
I believe that you'd have to press your claim via conquest at this point, unfortunately.
Time to announce Glorious Revolution 2
Always find the breakdown of DNA very interesting! Thank you for posting this!
I enjoy the charts and history of each family you choose to do. Keep up the good work
Please make this a series for other monarchs. It could be really fun
Yes,Indeed,That Would Be Interesting!!! Do One For Spain's King Felipe VI,Sweden's King Karl XVI Gustav,One For Willem-Alexander Of The Netherlands And One For Queen Margerethe II Of Denmark!!!
The Danish Royal family: France, German, United Kingdom, Sweden, Poland, Austria, Russian, Greek, Norwegian, Portugal and maybe 5-10 % danish
Yes
Nicholas and Alexandra (Russia)
Death: *exists*
The queen: “imma bout to end this mans whole career”
🗣Treason!
Dan r/wooosh
Legit content creators: *exist*
RUclips: *exists*
5 minute crafts: *its a Real free estate*
One day I have a feeling there will be a. " r/agedlikemilk"
Lol 😂
Totally in awe of your work. Fascinating. Truly enjoyed this!
Love these! Keep sharing them!
Queen Elizabeth is actually my 11th cousin 3 times removed. I am related to her by her Hungarian ancestors, the Rédey/Rhédey family.
What do you mean by "3 times removed"?
Bence Fülöp his generation is different than her majesty. Most likely his great-grandparent is/was 11th cousins with her majesty.
That’s because Queen Mary’s paternal grandmother was Countess Claudine Rhédey von Kis-Rhéde, the Countess von Hohenstein, a very distant relative of a very close relative of Vlad the Impaler.
@@bflp311 Removal means number of generations difference. The child of your first cousin is your first cousin once removed. The grandchild of your first cousin is your first cousin twice removed.
Thank you, I understand now.
There's no need for overexplaining.
I wanted to see the DNA makeup for a Royal so thank you Useful Charts
This isn't quite DNA by the way :((((
@@theopinionator7196 i0
We don't have that technology yet bud.
Would love to see more of these! And show us how you calculated them (which ancestors are in which ethnic bucket)!!
Really enjoy this. Keep it coming.
Count Dracula
Explains why she she’s immortal....(lol)
Edit: this is a joke, I know “Dracula” AKA Vlad the Impaler wasn’t a vampire 🧛♂️
Edit 2: Well…she’s not immortal, she’s passed away on the 8th September 2022 RIP 😕
Bwahahahaha! Or the walking dead. Lmao
It also explains why some small children are afraid of her. Hmm..
She hates garlic.
True story. Lol
@@druid139 It would not surprise me that she hates garlic. 😅She probably hates crucifixes, too.
@@tanyakasim3988 She is the head of the Church of England, aka Anglican, aka Episcopalian.
Before I clicked on this I thought “what’s the point?” but this turned out to be really interesting!
This is fascinating, thank you!
Thank you for posting. This is very interesting.
It always irritates me when people make jokes about the Queen being German, because that's such lazy reasoning. Yes, she has quite a bit of German ancestry but the reason the Hanoverians got the throne was because they had English and Scottish ancestry.
Kate Cooper And the fact that they were the most senior heirs who weren’t Catholic.
that's true Kate, however in between are almost 300 years of Germans.
Kate Cooper
The grandmother of George I was a Stuart. That’s why he got the throne. They would have gotten someone more closely related to the Stuart but they were all Catholics and George I was the only Stuart descendant Protestant they could find. They had to pass 30 people who were more closely related to the Stuarts because they were all Catholics.
Well, weren't Saxons from Germany/Denmark too?
@@KateeAngel Yes, from the coastline of todays Netherlands and north-west Germany up to todays Danish border. Part of them were the tribe of the Angeln, so simplified later called Anglo-sachsonians. They came to the British islands in 4. and 5. century, I think. It wasn't so much about nations with borders, more about tribes in that time and tribes were moving.
I don't see a problem with Anglo-Saxons being ruled by a monarch originating from the House of Saxony in the male line. An english Saxon Queen for the Anglo-Saxons.
yup
what if it turns out we've been ruled by the normans for nearly a thousand years
You're a right norman!
Anglo-Saxons were also invaders originally. Plus it is a question whether English actually have more descent from Angles, Saxons and co than from Brittons
Unless you want to give the whole island back to the Welsh, best not to worry about which wave of invaders a particular brit comes from
This is well done. Thanks
Thank you for the research.
this is a really cool video, thanks matt!
So what are those 2% “other” in William’s DNA?
Mostly Armenian.
0.781% Armenian
0.585% Dutch
0.292% Danish
0.158% Belgian
0.146% Swedish
0.146% Swiss
0.122 % Bohemian
0.097% Lithuanian
0.097% Russian
@@AChannelFrom2006 ok thanks
Wasn't King George the third married a biracial princess or something like that?
People deny any black ancestry unless you're black.
CarmenMonoxide Nah, there just lots of people making black claims where there is none.
CarmenMonoxide Utter non-sense. The alleged African ancestor is 14 to 16 generations removed from Queen Charlotte. According to a genealogist, Queen Charlotte’s African ancestry is 0.012%. From a genetic genealogical perspective, Queen Charlotte has ZERO African DNA as DNA inheritance only goes back 6-7 generations. Really quite silly for anyone to claim that Queen Charlotte was “biracial” or “black” or any other stupid socio political term. She was simply predominantly German.
Regarding DNA, nationality means very little. All my known ancestors were 100% German but, when I got my DNA test, the result was 41.5 % Scandinavian, 27.8 % English, 4.6 % Irish, Scottish, Welch, and only 26,1 % North and West European and this includes many other countries besides Germany.
Great video!
The Queen is more Hungarian than French... Lol
Actually reptilian is more correct !!!!!!
@@editingreality4779 no that’s trump
@@calblack4156 you sure never heard of a certain Zuckerberg
Is that what you got from it??? 🤦♂️ So what if she is, not much of a joke if that's your intent
@@natmanprime4295 it wasnt ment to be a joke, it was a fun fact
100% - Illuminati Space Lizard
👁️🚀🦖
(somewhere in the distance) Beyond the mysterious beyond...
Kkkkkkkkkk
Your comment deserves more likes.
😆😅😂
amazing video
I didn't know I wanted to know this until I came across it. So interesting. Thank you for your research.
You deserve more subs mate
The most intriguing case of DNA tests and Royals is the case of Tomas Masaryk, the founder of the Czechoslovakian Republic, and allegedly illegitimate child of Franz Josef of Austria, Emperor of Austria & King of Hungary etc. Unfortunately his descendants cancelled the whole test procedure last minute.
Fun fact: Charlotte Garrigue(Masaryk's American wife) was a descendant of William Brewster, one of the Mayflower Pilgrims.
@@marcusbierman5310 isnt that just the same
@@blobfish_plays6548 Sorry, for some reason it didn't show the 1st one on my screen when I posted it, so i wrote it again. Both showed up this time so I have now deleted the 2nd one.
@@marcusbierman5310 oh ok
How do you know he was the allegedly son of Franz Josef?
Interesting, good work.
"every branch we go back the number doubles"
Incest: yeah about that
Thanks for doing this exercise, it was fun to see. Maybe do some of the other current ruling monarchs.
Oh my gosh I loved this so much
Very interesting. Thank you !
Great thanks!
I love videos like this. I loved how you pointed out how King George VI and his forefathers were, through their loyalty, thoroughly British. I think King George VI may be one of the best to have sat on the British throne. There have been of course, many remarkable individuals, from Queen Victoria, who spread the empire to one on 'which the sun never set,' to the current Queen Elizabeth II, who has held steadfast in her grace and sense of duty despite the ever increasing lewdness and obscenity of our times. I love how their impact lead to entire time periods being named after them- from the Georgian to Edwardian Era- their influence on history has been thus immortalised.
Could you please do a video on the coat of arms of a few royal individuals? What do these symbols mean? How are they chosen?
Your videos are so well done and coherent, thank you for your work.
Very good. Now I would want to see a video on all the members of the ten generations leading to Queen Elizabeth :)
Pretty interesting, my family has been in the US for 250 years. I’m 92% British and Irish. I’m more British than the queen.😄
that's normal. Cause there is no American culture, the country is too young. Its basically a big mix between every continent in the world. But most of the ppl in the states have European heritage. Cause many ppl moved their when life in Europe was bad, and the life in the us is much better.
@@l3ntl0rd14 Well Native Americans would have American heritage, right?
@@Smitology they are the REAL Americans
@@g.w.f.212 actually native Americans was from Asia
@@patissialabrinhghetto2429 And the pacific, plus new research points to some european ancestery even before the asians and islanders arrived.
So interesting, thank you
The funny coincident: when we track back our ancestors, every generation the number of individuals double. Also, if we track some a given person's offspring, generation to generation, the number of individuals increases too, and about as much, because sometimes they get more children than two, sometimes just one. Usually - the noble house have perhaps more cases of extinct family branches, due to murders of the power struggles, or inherited deseases due to inbreeding,
We are all inbred to some degree.
Dats wot me sista mummy always says
@@Mister_Pedantic Yeah, but what good does that statement do to help avoid the mechanisms causing inbreeding? Like if a bank was robbed, it doesn't help to say we're all criminals to a degree - though it's a correct statement. That's the trouble of some seemingly wise generalizations. They keep us grinding on the same spot, nothing changes.
Well, the rule of thumb works pretty fine: marry no siblings, better avoid the cousins. And If you live in a small village, better go look from the neighbouring villages :)
In the countryside people breeding animals kept this knowledge very well.
The nobility in many cultures lost contact to the natural - they created the idea of the pure blood of the nobles. So it started to look like a small village in their circles: about all the royal houses of Europe were somewhat related.
So they really needed the pedigree charts, when the science opened up this issue :) Which people in the countryside knew better: the 'uncivilized'.
The nobles are not really the aim of my edge: it's the human pride to do whst they want, if power, money, strength, beauty, intelligence etc. only yields. Power and opportunity without responsibility, without limits.
Like the bourgeoisie are a good examplwe of the same in the 19th and early 20th centuries: thriugh industry they became rich, which was nrew to them. So they looked for the signs of wealth and power - status symbols - the nobility used: clothes, jewellery, houses, horses, dogs & cats.
But while the nobility had century old experience and practicality concerning keeping horses and dogs, the upstart bougeoisie didn't. So they bought dogs and cats for status symbols, but there was no natural purpuse for them, like the nobles had hunting dogs of various kinds, and guard dogs - bred for the purpose, not for the looks - so the breeds stayed usually healthy.
The newly rich started their breeding programs. But there was no practicality linked to them, no natural purpose - just the whims how they each saw the dogs beautiful, or cats. So they started to breed versions of the dogs who looked special, oustanding or pretty in their eyes.
So now we still have dog breeds that suffer from hip pains for unhealthy shape bred to them; or short muzzled dogs with eye and respirational problems for the nose (snout?) being too short for them.
Or there are hairless cats, or some breeds who are too skinny - long but not wide enough torso, so they have spinal problems.
And the hunters did breed problems too, in thier greed to use the dogs - those short legged breeds meant to go to tunnels to fight badgers etc. Or then we just simply overfeed the pets.
- This long story to vent my anger and horror of the distortions of the natural our vanity does. For a closure of the human inbreeding: I understand the dilemmas of the small isolated communities, but the nobles have chosen their isolation. Well, more so in the history, now the situation is improving considerably. I just want to bring it up to discuss of the problems of alienation from the natural.
@@timomastosalo I would suggest that your "anger and horror" is misplaced. It's 2020 now and "the nobles" no longer marry their cousins. However, if you need a contemporary target, there is a certain isolated community in Britain that practices first-cousin marriages generation after generation and they certainly have a dilemma. Regards.
@@Mister_Pedantic Oh, boy - here we go again. That's, not what I said… How do you read? What worries me is your kind of readers quote people wrong. You pick sentences here, others there - and combine in a new way you think the writer thinks! That's not what they think. Don't put your interpretations in my mouth - be more careful, responsible. Don't assume.
Could it be you're UK citizen, and you read my comments like you're used to see comments about it in the UK? I don't live in a country with royalty - I've just seen how people behave, if they think they're above others. Plus how pride feeds stupidity. Sometimes in myself. And though we don't have royalty, I'm not American. Maybe my grammatical errors give away my mother tongue isn't English, it's Finnish.
You misplaced my anger and horror to the nobles - though I specifically said it's about our alienation from the natural - (however it comes). Like that isolated community you mentioned.
But the nobles have been an example of the self-caused problems that follow. And I did also say lucky things are getting better in their family lines - so that 'it's 2020 now' was needless, just showed your careless reading. I pointed at the science helping opening these matters up: so the chsnge in the knowledge and attitudes about marrying.
And I said those often called uncivilized have actually been more civilized in this matter. People who have bred animals have understood the logic covering us people as well. But isolated in courts, people alienated from the nature.
The same happens nowadays in urban environments, when people want to spend their money on entertainment more than on family, and the birthrates drop. This time not inbreeding (much), but alienating from the natural by escapism. Going home from the bars when the sun is rising, sleeping the time when the sun is up, and waking up for br- late lunch. After eating, taking a shower, plus watching telly 2-3 hrs, - out at the sunset. So they can start the next night at the pub. Naturally? Show must go on, does anybody know what are we living for... ?
I don't need the nobility especially as a target: the thing is they used to think they are better than the commoners - which made them isolate and hurt themsleves genetically. The same can happen for other reasons than self-chosen isolation - these people can't help it.
But those who choose it, be they a cult, nobles or other isolationists, do it for themselves. If they also think they are better than others, oh how great is the irony. Like I said, i's more horrifying, chilling than ridiculous - to that element is there too, when someone lifts his, her nose up when seeing 'the lessers'.
The point wasn't contemporary or historical practices - but studying how people end up in that. And another theme was how our pride twists our perception of reality - how it alienates us. Thinking we get wise, we actually get more stuopif, if we congratulate ourselves for our wisdom.
Happy Birthday your majesty!
Your voice is most delightful!
What you do is very cool . Thank you .
'British' DNA is a combination of the pre-Indo Europeans (Druids), the Celts, the German (Jutes, Angles, and Saxons), Viking (via Normandy).
And viking via viking conquest
@ShalakumX Simba the Romans had very little impact genetically, Britania was very far from the rest of the Roman world and Rome had better things to do than try to replace the local population. The outskirts of the Roman empire were generally only garisoned enough to maintain a military presence, work alliances with the local elites, keep trade open, and get the locals to extract resources for them. They would have been a small portion of the population. In contrast, the Anglo-Saxons invasions included waves of their own people whose population was to big for the resources offered in their original homelands.
Do not forget Danelaw.
You forgot Anglo Irish Pakistani 😅
Viking isn't a culture, it was a word that meant something along the lines of "warrior". If you want to talk about Norway, Denmark, Sweden etc the correct term is Scandinavian. Also, Druid is not a culture either.
The queen * laughs in immortal * I was there all along
When Dino’s come back they be like yo wassup Liz I remember u
Very informative. Thanks. 😊
Fascinating. Thank you.
I like this video!! You should do this with other european monarchs (sorry for the posible bad english)
Watching the Maaterpiece show Victoria made me interested in learning more about European royalty. I became so curious about what ethnicity royals actually were/are since they all seem to just marry each other! Like you said, Prince Philip isn’t actually Greek it Danish, he’s more likely ethnically German, because the kingdoms are intermarry. Location does not mean ethnicity or race.
Queen Victoria’s many children all ended up marrying different royal families all over Europe. Queen Victoria herself as we know was German on her mother’s side, and then she married her German first cousin. So her kids had a lot of German in them.
King George III, Victoria’s grandfather married Charlotte of Portugal, who is rumored to have been of African decent, so I wouldn’t be surprised if Queen Elizabeth’s DNA read trace amounts of African ancestry.
Actually no. Queen Victoria's children didnt marry different royal families all over Europe. In fact most married other german minor princes and princesses, except for Edward who married a Danish princess (who was, like Prince Philip, of predominantly german ancestry) and Louise who married and English nobleman, duke of Argyll. King George iii did not marry a "Charlotte of Portugal". He married princess Charlotte of mecklenburg-strelitz, who was part of a noble German family, whose ancestry was filled with countless of white europeans. She wasnt biracial or black.
I really enjoyed this video. I'm always interested in history...thanks!
Extremely interesting, thanks
I love this video especially the points about why the name changes have occurred. Its like the concept of taking your fathers name is too complicated to understand the affect when the throne passed through women, Elizabeth of York, Elizabeth Stuart (George Is Grandmother). They also prey upon German-British animus without acknowledging that the Germanification was caused by the sheer number of German houses, the fact that marrying French and Portugese Catholics was unacceptable after 1689 and the kicker Britain was allied with those largely North German states against the French for centuries.
I love your videos! Thank you for making them. I learn something new each time.
I think this video was pretty cool. Thank you. 😊
Love reading these topics, they are very interesting,Thanks for sharing.
Absolutely love your video info and the great clear way in which you present them. I wonder if you could please research Lord Skene, Provost of Aberdeen, Scotland. - He is like my 18th? Great Grandfather, and apparently, we are descendants of King Robert I The Bruce of Scotland. The Skene's in Scotland were very prominent lawyers, advocates, barristers, and in Edinburgh, Lord Curriehill (yet another Skene) was a prosecutor of witches - He is buried at Greyfriars Kirkyard ( of Greyfriars Bobby movie fame) in Edinburgh. My own family married into Robert the Bruce via Jean Burnett (Burnett). I am the 22nd Great Grand-daughter of King Robert I The Bruce, A great man!! Fascinating stuff!! Thanks. Love from Scotland, x.
That moment when you’re more British than the Queen of England.
NO SUCH ROLE!!!! SHE WAS THE QUEEN OF THE UNITED KINGDOM IDIOT......
Thé moment you realise there is no such title the queen of England,that title died out hundreds of years ago
very interesting!!
Very interesting type of video, please do this for other monarchs etc. as well
OMG! I was just watching some of your British family videos last night along with another you tubers and kept thinking “I know they have a lot of German ancestry in them but I wonder more specifically what their genetic makeup would be”
This video has perfect timing! I can’t wait for my coworkers to get out so I can watch 🤣
Your breakdown of Charles really got me thinking about his claim to the Greek throne. Just how did a Danish family get onto such a distant throne? Did they have Eastern Roman ancestry?
After the Greeks kicked out their last king in the 1800’s. The great powers of the time picked prince William Of Denmark to be Greeks new king. He was only 17 yrs old and changed his name to George.
@@annhewett9622 On what qualifications though?
@@supercell615 That he was not connected to any of the great powers at the time, Germany, Russia, Britain and France. That's about it.
@@annhewett9622 Ouch, that's a pretty low qualifier.
@@supercell615 I know but he did good and ruled for about 50 years.
Very interesting!
Would love to see a video on the monarchy of Belgium one of these days if possible!
The Royal House of Belgium is also called Saxe-Coburg Gotha. King Leopold I was the father of Victoria's husband Prince Albert the Prince Consort. The British, as stated in the video, dropped the Gotha bit but the Belgium Royal Family still use the full name to this day.
Interesting but one thing people often forget is that the categories on different dna sites don’t correspond so much with modern nationalities then they do with broad clusters, such as the British and Irish category in 23&me being usually far higher in individuals of Irish decent then of English because the English people often have germanic ancestry from the Anglo-Saxon, Norse, and Norman invasions, as well as a bit of Gallic from the later. Or that the French and German category peaks around the Rhine, Belgium and Switzerland, rather that the hearts of either country, showing a possible connection to the ancient Hallstatt or La Tène celts of Central Europe, who were thought to have spread northwest using the Rhine before being taken over by germanic and Latin speaking peoples
you are confused, The brits are the welsh
This was absolutely amazing. Now that QEII has passed, maybe you could update the list.
Interesting and crazy to follow. Thank you!
Easy not crazy. Apologies for the typo.
Can you do similar thing for Spanish monarchs?
"His father... And his father's father"
Ooh, Monty Python.
😂
fun stuff, thanks.
Interesting. Thanks
Can you explain house names? how they work and why we have them?
By mood of the king in european Countries, but in middle eastern only by agnatic line
Yeahhhhh
@@user-fj5wn9iq5r most of the dynasty names come from the place where the dynasty first ruled, for eg von Habsburg , d'anjou, bourbon, Valois, von wettin, Hannover
The name of the house was changed because of the anti German sentiment at the time.
House of Normandy : they ruled Normandy.
House of Anjou : they ruled Anjou.
House of Plantegenet : from the nickname of Henry II.
Thank you this.
It is very artificial to consider ethnic groups genetically as ethnicity is actually a cultural construct not a genetic construct. Many of the Queen’s ‘Germanic’ ancestors had a fair amount of British blood eg Queen Mary (grandmother) had a German father but a British mother. Her great grandmother was Danish. So the Germanic proportion would be quite diluted as well.
Strange times if you call genetical science artificial. I mean, it's biological science, what artificial can be about it.
@@erynn9968 Biologically there is no such thing as different human races. If you don’t believe me do a little research about biologists say about race.
@@brontewcat Lol where I say there are different human races? Where does video say that? Biologically, our genes are slightly different among ethnicities but much closer to each other within each ethnicity. That's why people are united into ethnicities. If you can't read or have hallucinations of the word "race" everywhere... then do little something about yourself XD
@@erynn9968 I don’t even understand what you mean by ethnicity if you are talking biologically. Ethnicity has nothing to do with biology. Perhaps you need to give some examples of what you are talking about, and them we can look at what the biology actually says.
There are certainly almost no biological differences between Germans and British people.
Very Interesting!
Spot on analysis.
What is the other in the last one?
Mostly some Scandinavian and Eastern European
@@UsefulCharts and like literally any other European DNA from intermarrying the Dutch or other royal houses
@@UsefulCharts why isn't there Dutch DNA in any of the royals. A Dutch king ones was king of England and married a British royal
Why is this that is keeping me up at night? It's literally 2:30 in the morning i gotta sleep
Same here
Because deep in your heart you know something is wrong with these people 🤔
Where do you guys live?
This is so cool! I would really want to try these DNA tests, sadly they are not readily available in Belize. :-(
Yes!!! I loved this!!!
For anyone wondering, the Hungarian DNA comes from Queen Mary’s (Queen Elizabeth’s Grandmother) paternal grandmother, Countess Claudine Rhédey von Kis-Rhéde
there is someone in the comments who is in that family.
Theodor B I sincerely doubt it. She only had 3 children, 1 died without issue and another had a child but said child dropped into obscurity. There really wouldn’t be that many living descendants of her
I am speculating on the "Other" under Prince William. His mtDNA (through Diana) came out of the Indian subcontinent. I think the story is that a Scottish merchant brought a subcontinent bride back to Scotland.
Yes,..it was very interesting!!
Your charts keep me entertained for hours ! Brilliant.
Educational and fun
The late Queen was Scottish on both her late father King George's side and her late mother's side , the "Queen Mother"! She was also related to the high Irish king Brian Boru and Princess Catherine of Wales also has Irish lineage as well! I'm a mostly Brit-American with English/Scottish and Irish ancestry with some French on my late mother's side and we can trace our family history, the Drew family all the way back to William the Conqueror, first Norman king of England. The Drew family is one of the oldest families in the UK and is listed in his Doomsday book of 1066! Many Americans esp from Yankee New England and Virginia can trace their ancestry back that far via DNA tests now and from family written and oral history! On my paternal side, my ancestry is German/Swiss /Dutch i.e. Pennsylvania Dutch and three of my forebears were generals in the Revolutionary War, one being General Henry Mertz of Pennsylvania! We had a genealogist do the family history in 1940. Cheers!
Yes, I can see that Catherine has Irish ancestry from the way she looks! - as did Princess Diana.
1. Germanic is not the same as german. Germanic also includes peoples like: english, Dutch, swedish...
2. This is more of a question: shouldn't celtic (scotish, irish...) and english DNA be separate?
Most likely enough way early intermarriage between anglo saxons, normans, romans and the celtic occurred so separating them would be next to impossible using DNA. Only written and oral histories can do that if they are available.
No, the English has the same dna as the Irish, Scottish, and the welsh
@@lel1490 Incorrect. English is primarily Germanic like OP said. Only Lowland-Scots have a significant claim to also having a strong amount of Germanic due to the Angles' kingdom of Northumbria, which also controlled SE Scotland. Everyone else is primarily of Celtic decent - The Irish, the Welsh and The Scots of the Highlands/South West (Strathclyde).
Sure, there has been a lot of mixing over the years, with much of this being more recent due to modern living, but no, the English aren't counted amongst the Celtic nations - with exception to Cornwall. Couple with this also to the heavy influence of Danish DNA that branched out from the East of England, just as the the Saxons, Angles, Jutes and Frisians had done before.
*My DNA results - English 47.8% Celtic 45% Scandinavian 7.2%
Was an excellent video Listening from Mass USA TYVM very interesting
Fascinating , never knew this was possible,
I know you did a video about the Queen's Arab ancestry via Spain but it would be interesting to know if there are any other Asian or African ancestors of the Queen or other related royals families.
I doubt the Queen's DNA would match this exactly. Even when you go back ten generations, in a royal lineage, the ancestors you find are mostly all royals and thus have themselves a very mixed and atypical genetic make-up compared to the population of their country. One would have to go back to the truly "native" first monarchs, when the Western Roman Empire collapsed.
He didn't say it does..just closely resemble...
(PREDICTED)
In the end the Royal Heritage Lines are mostly boiling down to much German Ancestry all around European Monarchy. That's why they are opting by now rather to marry non-peer than keep on way to much incest over the centuries.
bro i am a big fan of you
Amazing.
Honestly You sound like Dr Eric berg giving us history lessons instead of keto tips 😂
"The next in line"
Sir, Queen Elizabeth II will never die as she was born immortal through the powers of "holy crap, how is the queen still alive."
Reptilian aliens are immortal!
She can only live twice the normal amount of her great Grandchildren's generation.
That's up to 240 years of age.
She's around ninety's and her firstborn great grandson, William's Heir, is a toddler.
Therefore, her Firstborn Great Great Grandson might actually have a chance to succed her.
My great grandmother is older than her
She’s not. Using clone or body double.
Germanic people conquered all those places after Rome collapsed. Anglo Saxons were Germanic, as were Normans, Russian nobility and pretty much every other royal house were all descended from Germans, Norse vikings or their ancestors.
Fascinating
Who else’s mouth dropped when they saw Hungarian?
I don’t really know much about Hungary so no
Mine did.
@@noble5856 yes she has some Transylvanian roots
She is 6,25% Romanian.
@@popacristian2056 Didn't her eldest son admit that he's a descendant of Vlad the Impaler over a decade ago? 🤔