Print emulation was indeed the only thing missing to get the actual Hollywood look. I now consider Dehancer complete. Although more print emulations would be lovely too, like Fuji's, or older Kodaks, and why not, Technicolor (the holy grail of things that people trying to emulate).
@@mativie Yes, it's what gives it the authentic released-movie look. Films when get to the cinema, they are printed on other film stocks, so they get an additional layer of a "look". The print emulation on Dehancer adds that to make the film look more authentic, as it was released in cinemas.
Why doesn't my Dehancer look like this when using the exact same profiles? I have the correct colour management and colour space settings for my camera. In particular the Kodak Vision3 500T profile looks wildly different
@@Jordan_Harris it's little bit more complicated. Even if this plugin looks like a tool "plug and play" you have to do certain more changes to your footage before you put Dehancer. I download trial and tried to recreate the footage from 1:55 and I got very close results like on this video. - 1st node - it's your raw 709 footage - 2nd node - it' your layer node that this bottom one preserve and safes skin tones (you have to preselect skin tones by qualifier) and upper one make an inpact of background colors like lighting, blacks ect. by using color wheels etc. - 3rd node - it's Dehancer To reach goal, build this node tree and firstable try to pre-set Dehancer on third one. Choose film profile and print profile. Do some changes with Dehancer tools with your taste and then go back to 1st and 2nd node to play with skin tones and the background. It will give you the best results. If you put only Dehancer you will never get this results. Of course every footage needs different job to do. It's good to keep in mind that footage in this video is almost perfect to work with. Really interesting lighting and quality. Dehancer really help to create "film look" a lot but to get perfect results the is a lot more adjustments to do. Best regards, Maciej ;)
Would it be possible to share the Resolve project of this video? Even using this video as a base the colors look way different when using the emulations off the bat
Bought the Dehancer. I think you should do a tutorial how to achieve the look we see here (colorgrading). This is not what you get by buying and installing the product.
You can find many video reviews and tutorials about using Dehancer in RUclips, We've collected the best on our website: www.dehancer.com/videos/reviews Also we're recommend you to read usefull articles about Dehancer tools in our blog: blog.dehancer.com/articles/
It's simple as the video shows tbh. The reason why the shots here look good and easy is because the shots themself are good and have good lighting which is rare to see of a tutorial
@@_arturjutkowiak_film In this footages the main look made with Dehancer. And sometimes a little addition corrections (like source wthite balance, raw-corrections and so on) was added.
We would really benefit from a tutorial on upgrading Dehancer. I tried but couldn't figure it out, and your instructions on your site aren't very clear
When i apply the Kodak 2383 Print Film the footage turns very warm and blow up. It´s not easy to get back at normal color temperature. Cam you explain a little more hao to work with the Kodak 2383 Print Film, please?
U need to create Node before Kendal 2383 tht where u can correct the color , white balance, contrast and highlights and Shadows tht the best way to work with film Print
Hi!! I have a doubt, what is the correct way to apply dehancer with bmpcc 6k raw footsge?, should I first make a conversion to output Rec 709 and then in dehancer put input Rec 709? Is this the correct way?
If there is a dedicated profile in Dehancer, we suggest you use it first. If for some reason it doesn’t work, you can use any available means (CST, IDT, factory Luts, manual de-Log) for interpreting your source material in Rec.709 for further processing with Dehancer.
I don't understand. Whenever you use the 250d film emulation it's a horrid blue mess. Whenever you add the 2383 print on top of it it's a contrasty, slightly desaturated blue mess. How the hell do I get it to look good?
Hi, I don't have the Pro version but one question. To use the print profile you need to use 2 nodes ? 1 for film simulation and 1 for print profile or all in the same node ? - Thanks
@@PavelKosenko do you guys have white balance settings these people used? I was wondering if setting your camera to 3200 or 5600 is the best way to simulate shooting on specific stocks because the films in past were set at those?
Is there a space transform involved upon using the plugin like for example if my clip is an Arri Log C will the plugin transform it to rec709 or will it still remain as Arri Log C?
I like a lot of what yall are doing and am tempted to purchase the Pro version (money isnt an issue) however, I have yet to see any examples that show a decent level of color saturation. It looks like most of these assume a desaturated color look but do not look at all like actual graded film scans I have received from labs. Is there something about your plugin that subdues the color in the image or is it just that no one likes the saturated film look?
Thanks for the question. Dehancer is built upon optical printing sampling, which means that no scanner inner software is interfering with the picture. Film scanner manufacturers create their own interpretation of color and gamma. Here are a few tips on how to get a saturated picture with Dehancer: 1. Treat your source wisely Make sure your input profile is correct. With some specific cameras and shooting modes, you’ll probably need to add a bit of saturation in RAW clip settings or in a separate node before Dehancer. In ACES select input profile properly or experiment with different input profiles to your taste. 2. Choose the saturated film All films look different in terms of saturation. Slide film is usually more vivid while negative film tends to be more delicate and sometimes muted colors. Also, try experimenting with Push/Pull slider, since film exposure affects colors significantly. 3. White balance really matters A strong color cast or hue shift makes the image more monotonous. Then try to find a ‘reference neutral’ object and correct the white balance accordingly at the source level (before Dehancer) or with our Color Head tool. Try both and choose the better or even combine the corrections. 4. Play with Expand, Exposure, and Tonal Contrast Dehancer tonal correction starts with setting Black and White points in Expand tool. Black point is essential here. Also, lowering exposure generally results in deeper colors. And finally, get ready to increase contrast to get significantly reacher tones. 5. Try the Color Density tool Color Density in Dehancer is a perceptual tool that affects saturation aesthetically, in a sophisticated way. The strongest effect is visible on the colors that are most important for human perception.
@@evgeniyyavtushenko7653 Возможно, мисандестендинг из-за того, что судя по всему, у нас с вами есть более понятный общий язык :) Извините, если прозвучало странно, мы не хотели обидеть.
Showing braw / log Footage makes no sense for comparison. You want to compare the "final image" (Print Film Emulation) to a "normal balanced" (Rec709) image. Not to braw or log.
INCREDIBLE!!
Thank you!
Brilliant in a thousand ways !
Print emulation was indeed the only thing missing to get the actual Hollywood look. I now consider Dehancer complete. Although more print emulations would be lovely too, like Fuji's, or older Kodaks, and why not, Technicolor (the holy grail of things that people trying to emulate).
Yes, we are working on new print profiles and plan to add them in the future.
@@Dehancer A technicolor print profile would really make my year
You are absolutely obsessed with film emulation lol. I don't mean that in a bad way, I've just seen you on TONS of video comments.
What is this print emulation as addition to the regular emulation? Is it like a kind of layer?
@@mativie Yes, it's what gives it the authentic released-movie look. Films when get to the cinema, they are printed on other film stocks, so they get an additional layer of a "look". The print emulation on Dehancer adds that to make the film look more authentic, as it was released in cinemas.
0:10 the shot and emulations are incredible wow
Beautiful.
Why doesn't my Dehancer look like this when using the exact same profiles? I have the correct colour management and colour space settings for my camera. In particular the Kodak Vision3 500T profile looks wildly different
Hi. We would love to try and do our best to help you solve this issue. What is your email address?
@Dehancer I'm already in touch with your support team trying to figure out the cause of the differences 😊
@@Jordan_Harris oh, got it. have a great day!
@@Jordan_Harris it's little bit more complicated. Even if this plugin looks like a tool "plug and play" you have to do certain more changes to your footage before you put Dehancer.
I download trial and tried to recreate the footage from 1:55 and I got very close results like on this video.
- 1st node - it's your raw 709 footage
- 2nd node - it' your layer node that this bottom one preserve and safes skin tones (you have to preselect skin tones by qualifier) and upper one make an inpact of background colors like lighting, blacks ect. by using color wheels etc.
- 3rd node - it's Dehancer
To reach goal, build this node tree and firstable try to pre-set Dehancer on third one. Choose film profile and print profile. Do some changes with Dehancer tools with your taste and then go back to 1st and 2nd node to play with skin tones and the background. It will give you the best results.
If you put only Dehancer you will never get this results.
Of course every footage needs different job to do. It's good to keep in mind that footage in this video is almost perfect to work with. Really interesting lighting and quality.
Dehancer really help to create "film look" a lot but to get perfect results the is a lot more adjustments to do.
Best regards,
Maciej ;)
Would it be possible to share the Resolve project of this video?
Even using this video as a base the colors look way different when using the emulations off the bat
This looks great!
Who made that music ? What a great demo for ANY product !
Bought the Dehancer. I think you should do a tutorial how to achieve the look we see here (colorgrading). This is not what you get by buying and installing the product.
You can find many video reviews and tutorials about using Dehancer in RUclips, We've collected the best on our website:
www.dehancer.com/videos/reviews
Also we're recommend you to read usefull articles about Dehancer tools in our blog:
blog.dehancer.com/articles/
It's simple as the video shows tbh. The reason why the shots here look good and easy is because the shots themself are good and have good lighting which is rare to see of a tutorial
@@PeterDiBussolo That is not true unfortunately. This is a sophisticated colorgrading + Dehancer. Dehancer alone will not help you get this look.
@@_arturjutkowiak_film no your right, absolutely. Dehancer is the cherry on top of these shots. What makes these shots are lens choice and lighting.
@@_arturjutkowiak_film In this footages the main look made with Dehancer. And sometimes a little addition corrections (like source wthite balance, raw-corrections and so on) was added.
Achei bem bom, parabéns pra equipe de desenvolvimento! Hugs from Brazil
Is there a way we could get a breakdown of how this was applied? or the camera settings :D
At this point probably not.
Nice visuals!
We would really benefit from a tutorial on upgrading Dehancer. I tried but couldn't figure it out, and your instructions on your site aren't very clear
Very nice! If I shot the video in the Standard/regular profile (not log) ... what should my profile setting in DaVinci Resolve be set to?
Rec 709
@@loismissowou2502 Thank you!
Is there a video showing how to apply the emultaions in FCPX ?
Hi, we have a playlist "Reviews" with various tutorials from our users. Please check it out!
can you please make a tut for bmpcc4k?
When i apply the Kodak 2383 Print Film the footage turns very warm and blow up. It´s not easy to get back at normal color temperature. Cam you explain a little more hao to work with the Kodak 2383 Print Film, please?
Did you get an answer?
U need to create Node before Kendal 2383 tht where u can correct the color , white balance, contrast and highlights and Shadows tht the best way to work with film Print
Hi!! I have a doubt, what is the correct way to apply dehancer with bmpcc 6k raw footsge?, should I first make a conversion to output Rec 709 and then in dehancer put input Rec 709? Is this the correct way?
If there is a dedicated profile in Dehancer, we suggest you use it first.
If for some reason it doesn’t work, you can use any available means (CST, IDT, factory Luts, manual de-Log) for interpreting your source material in Rec.709 for further processing with Dehancer.
aerocolor
Не могу понять почему vision 3 500T краснит, он же вроде должен компенсировать лампы накаливания и давать более синеватый оттенок???😯
По сути-да. D-дневной,солнечный свет. T-лампы накаливания.. Тоже обратил внимание на несоответствие.. обычно T дает в синеву..странно..
I don't understand. Whenever you use the 250d film emulation it's a horrid blue mess. Whenever you add the 2383 print on top of it it's a contrasty, slightly desaturated blue mess.
How the hell do I get it to look good?
Could you please share your email so that our support team could contact you? We would also need some details and screenshots. Thanks!
Hi, I don't have the Pro version but one question. To use the print profile you need to use 2 nodes ? 1 for film simulation and 1 for print profile or all in the same node ? - Thanks
Hi, you need to use just one node.
@@PavelKosenko Thanks
@@PavelKosenko Dehancer is ok with Monterey with new MBP M1Pro ?
@@2020-k8v absolutely
@@PavelKosenko do you guys have white balance settings these people used? I was wondering if setting your camera to 3200 or 5600 is the best way to simulate shooting on specific stocks because the films in past were set at those?
I have a MacBook Pro 2.3 GHz 8-Core Intel Core i9 and when I go to download it will say install is complete but nothing else will pop up
Working in edius or no
this video is graded with Dehancer.
Can I use this on two machines? One is 2015 15” MacBook Pro (Iris graphics) and other is M1 Mac. Or it’ll give some issue?
Is there a space transform involved upon using the plugin like for example if my clip is an Arri Log C will the plugin transform it to rec709 or will it still remain as Arri Log C?
For Arri Log C you can use Camera Profile inside the Dehancer. You can check yourself, trial is free on the website
@@Dehancer is it available for Panasonic Lumix S1?
Hello. How to instal dehancer pro plugin for premier pro and ae for mac???
Hi! Unfortunately, the Pr/Ae plug-in isn't available for macOS yet. But we're working on it :)
Why can't I upgrade Dehancer to 5.0.0 by clicking "Check Profiles" within the plugin?
Because Check Profiles is tool for camera/film/print profiles updating. For update plugin please download it from our site:
www.dehancer.com/#download
I like a lot of what yall are doing and am tempted to purchase the Pro version (money isnt an issue) however, I have yet to see any examples that show a decent level of color saturation. It looks like most of these assume a desaturated color look but do not look at all like actual graded film scans I have received from labs. Is there something about your plugin that subdues the color in the image or is it just that no one likes the saturated film look?
Thanks for the question. Dehancer is built upon optical printing sampling, which means that no scanner inner software is interfering with the picture. Film scanner manufacturers create their own interpretation of color and gamma.
Here are a few tips on how to get a saturated picture with Dehancer:
1. Treat your source wisely
Make sure your input profile is correct.
With some specific cameras and shooting modes, you’ll probably need to add a bit of saturation in RAW clip settings or in a separate node before Dehancer.
In ACES select input profile properly or experiment with different input profiles to your taste.
2. Choose the saturated film
All films look different in terms of saturation. Slide film is usually more vivid while negative film tends to be more delicate and sometimes muted colors.
Also, try experimenting with Push/Pull slider, since film exposure affects colors significantly.
3. White balance really matters
A strong color cast or hue shift makes the image more monotonous.
Then try to find a ‘reference neutral’ object and correct the white balance accordingly at the source level (before Dehancer) or with our Color Head tool. Try both and choose the better or even combine the corrections.
4. Play with Expand, Exposure, and Tonal Contrast
Dehancer tonal correction starts with setting Black and White points in Expand tool. Black point is essential here.
Also, lowering exposure generally results in deeper colors.
And finally, get ready to increase contrast to get significantly reacher tones.
5. Try the Color Density tool
Color Density in Dehancer is a perceptual tool that affects saturation aesthetically, in a sophisticated way. The strongest effect is visible on the colors that are most important for human perception.
You need to add your own saturation in a separate dose to taste..
Looks good.
Is 2383 print emulation available in the Lite version of the program? 400 is a little steep for a plugin.
2383 is a feature of Dehancer Pro as the professional tool. Dehancer Lite is the tool for not professional tasks, so doesn't contain print profiles.
@@Dehancer that's a weird way of putting it
@@evgeniyyavtushenko7653 Возможно, мисандестендинг из-за того, что судя по всему, у нас с вами есть более понятный общий язык :) Извините, если прозвучало странно, мы не хотели обидеть.
Sorry for asking but, since I don’t speak either Russian nor Ukrainian, is this Russian language or Ukrainian? Are you guys from Russia or Ukraine?
This footage cannot be just from sigma 18-35, its not clinical at all. Were any other accessories used? Mist filters?
No filters, bloom effect inside the Dehancer
@@lobaskovdmitry4415 Where are these shots from?
why i cant export luts?
LUT export is disabled in the trial version. You need to buy pro version
Why is rec 709, why not Braw?
I think Log
Showing braw / log Footage makes no sense for comparison. You want to compare the "final image" (Print Film Emulation) to a "normal balanced" (Rec709) image. Not to braw or log.
@@allenpayne9182 Yes, that's right, thanks for the clarification.
Would you recommend applying Rec709 first before the Dehancer node on Resolve?
Yes its the best way less work
원본이 너무나 좋구만… ㅠ
FCPX version please!
Sure. Step by step.
I would love to see you guys try to emulate technicolor process: ruclips.net/video/N-T8MVrw1L0/видео.html