I've learned a lot since buying your kit and watching your videos. I never heard of setting the shutter speed to 1/25 to improve low light shooting. I can't wait to experiment with what I've learned from this video. Thanks, Joo!!
Glad I came across this video because I ordered a LUMIX G85 and the only thing I was worried about was its inability for use in low lighting. Great tips on how to improve this! ThankYou!!!!
You had me subbed by 1 minute in, It was the music and cuts, I loved the audio levels. But I'm just an audio engineer guy. suuuuuupppppper informational. You put a lot of work into this and it shows.
Light travels through clear glass the same way - It doesn't matter if you have a 100 feet of glass or 1mm. If it's clear the light is the same. A prime lens at f5.6 will let in the same amount of light as a 100mm telephoto at f5.6. Source: www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/content/prime-vs-zoom-can-you-tell-difference
You should do a comparison between the amount of noise from 4K vs the "6K" setting. Similar to what you did at the beginning when analyzing the clips, but more thorough.
Hey, very cool explanation. I think this is something that popular opinion gets very wrong on RUclips. They all want to change night for day instead of just accepting dark frames and grounding those with a highlight or a reflection. Great explanation, Joonas. 👍🏻
Great video. 90% of the “expert” camera channels will bang on about 180° shutter angle laws bla bla. It is absolutely valid to vary your shutter speed and for 60p playback or any electronic stability, faster shutter is better.
Brilliant video, awesome that you're replying to questions. May times I see video and people have questions but they are never answered. This is a great way to keep people looking at your videos. Love it. Cheers from Canada.
Another hard to understand aspect is that during low light you usually don't have much DR in the scene... Then why compressing all the input into V-Log is giving better results... compared to Cine-D you should have more space to record the same data...?
Recently I saw someone use the CineV profile for the GH5. Tonight, I shot some night scenes using the CineV profile and 10-bit. The CineV profile has a much cleaner grain structure than Log. So, I brought my shots into DaVinci Resolve and I was able to pull out more shadow detail and tone down the saturation without losing the nice grain structure. I really like the colors and details I can capture with CineV.
I recommend shooting the same scene with both profiles and then lift (make bright) the shadows up from the cine-v profile to same level as the V-log or push v-log down (make dark) to the level of cine-v. I would assume they're not to be much of a difference in 10bits. 8bits maybe because V-log is not so good in 8bits. While you are at it, try to compare HLG, Cine-V and V-log. You might get interesting results.
I totally agree I have always used very comparable settings and have always paid attention to most important in my opinion and that is what's in front of my camera "The Lens" not so much on whether I have Canon, Sony or Panasonic. Balancing the triangle is the trick. I love Olympus 17mm f0.95 on my GH5 for low light.
Yes. My bad I meant Voigtlander 17 mm 0.95 MFT & 25 MM both are amazing lenses Manual Focus and these are probably the sharpest best low light lenses for the GH5. I also have an Olympus I use for wide angle but it's not as good as Vogtlander it's a 12mm f1.8
your videos are so helpful. just wanted to say thanks. I'm learning a lot from you. Also Panasonic should say thank you to you too. I'll probably upgrade from a6000 to gh5
Yep. all are 10bit 4k and 6k. Vivid is recorded into rec709 colour space when v-log is panasonic v-gamut. v-gamut is larger than adobe RGB so it's rather large. You can see it sometime like with the clipping saturation on this video. I'll do some videos about colour spaces and stuff soon.
Is Cine-D same as Vivid -> rec709? Yea explanation of relationship between color space and 8/10bit would be very nice. I thought that bits are what defines how many color gradiens you get... But apparently there is more to it.
Colour space is how what colours can be captured and how the colours are captured. Dynamic range is how wide is the distance between totally black and totally white. Bit depth is how many steps there is between totally white and totally black. I'll do some videos about these later on to explain these all and what's the practical application of them
I've always shot in V-log for my GH5 but If it gets too dark I read it is better to shoot non log profile. In that case which profile should i shoot in? since Log + ISO 800 is normally the highest ISO I will go to keep sharp image on an f1.4 lens. THANKS! and keep up the great work!
TOLife I’m not sure if there is really a difference in noise between profiles or is the noise just more visible in v-log. You can just push down in grading. I´ll do some test later on.
Good explanation of the perennial small sensor problem and the sensible methods of minimising noise. Interesting points made about noise at 6K, too. The GH5 will never be a Sony A7RII (24000 ISO and little noise!) but your shots are as good as it gets, in my opinion. I had a GH4 and sold it because of the noise problem - above 800 ISO it was rubbish - but I will give the GH5 a go. The new GH5S is as yet untried but since my work is half stills and half video I may have to look at that too. Thanks for a clear and accurate presentation without the woffle!
Thanks. I've used Neat before and it's very good. For some reason it was not that good on my GH4, but it was better than not using it. Perhaps the GH5 will be better. The GH5S promises to be much better in low light, so perhaps a de-noiser will not be required.
J.D. Hughes yes, there is a limit on how low light you really want to shoot. The neat video is really good at 3200. At 6400 the image starts to fall part. Test it out, my requirements are not that high, for I do videos mostly to web.
I did try it at 3200, but it is poor for film use, although the GH5 makes up for the lack with its other features, internal 10 bit 4-2-2 for instance. Used Neat again and it is an improvement, but still not clean enough above 800 ISO/ASA, although probably good for Vlogging. Anyway, what do I know, I'm just a retired director still wading through reels of 16/35mm film :)
J.D. Hughes I like to keep the iso at 400 or 800. It's the sharpest, but I would add 3200 (+neatvideo) if needed to the mix. :-) I started shootin, at 6k, because premiere suddently started supportin, it. I'm loving the quality and now the difference in iso is really clear.
That's great news, thanks so much, btw- you have a great channel here- thanks for all your hard work and bringing people this great information, I will visit here often, cheers to you.
hi my friend can you make settings for gh5 to instal to camera please and which lense is best for very clear video because i have problem with my video alway same noise is there i not understand please help me thank you
Great video! all things I do as well. all these camera people want the faster chips, the faster processors. if they learned how to use their cameras and lenses, it would look GREAT! subbed
Can you see if this speedbooster is good because i dont have mutch money to buy a metabones www.ebay.com/itm/Focal-Reducer-Speed-Booster-Adapter-Canon-EOS-EF-mount-lens-to-Micro-4-3-M43-GX7/151961866004?hash=item2361a20f14:g:7MMAAOSwGvhUE~mO
OH! That's super cheap. Too cheap to my liking. :-D I could test this out, but it will take time, for I'm traveling for 60 days and can't order stuff there.
well if you could test it it would be nice and I dont have rush on this matter. thank you for the help. I will try to find other stuff good and cheap :)
um.. im here with a problem. i've bought my gh5 like 4 days ago, and.. it is freezing when i want to watch what i have got.. it just keep telling me "this motion image cannot be played", and when im trying to delet it, it says "this picture cannot be deleted" any solutions out there? coz i really love this camera a lot.. or should i return it back, and buy another one?
v-log you actually have less data per stop, but more stops of DR - So rec709 profiles will have more color information in the important stops - You are calling more accurate, but that is not really the case. Vivid ( not my preference ) will have more color information in the stops that carry the color in night shooting.
I have gh5 and metabones speedbooster with canon mount as I use Canon lenses I am wondering should I buy rokinon 12 mm with canon mount or micro 3/4 mount ... would speedbooster improve that lens even more?
VidooK ProductionS if you have the metobones, then get the canon mount one. The metabones one will make the lens wider, fastere, sharper and more bokelisous, and you can still just get your self a normal adapter (not speedbooster) and use the lens as it would look on a m4\3 mount.
Could You please help me with this question?; I have bought Samyang f2.0/12 mm NCS CS Ultra wide angle for mirrorless and I wanted to attach it to My Panasonic gh 5 via metabones speedbooster . Lens arrived today and I am surprised as it doesn't fit to metabones as well as it doesn't fit directly to the camera ... I realised that it is conon m mount and metabones is ef mount I am so confused and cannot find the answer in interent I can see there are adapters from ef lens to M body but I cannot find any from m lens to ef body would You please help Me ?
VidooK ProductionS I'm sorry, it migth just be that there is no adapter for that. Lenses with different mounts need a different distance from the sensor, because of focusing. For example canon ef need to be further from the sensor than m43 lenses Ef needs space for the mirror to fit in between. Because in the m43 there is no mirror that space can be used to fit an adapter in stead. So if the m-mount needs less space than the ef mount, then there is no space in between to fit the adpter. There might be some options of abapters with a diopter to change the focus distance, but they will be more expesive most likely. I wound return the lens and get the right one, or try and sell it. :-\
It's sigma 18-35mm f1.8 Nikon aps-c lens, but with metabones you can use it in m43 mount. The speedbooster will make it even faster f1.1 lens, but when it's zoom it isn't that fast. It's about the same as f1.4 native prime.
Hmm... Just one... No matter the price? Well then The Voigtlander f/0.95 25mm. Or some other focal length. It's manual, but native. I have not tested it, but seen some great looking footage from it. If you need autofocus... I had a leica 25mm 1.4 lens that was pretty much as fast as my Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 with the speed booster. It's a fantastic lens. Mine was stolen. Someone else understood the quality of it. That one you can get rather cheap from the internets.
ok thankxz! yes autofocus ... what you think 15mm f1.7 im leaning towards it...And im sorry for your lost too...i hope they take his jail mugshot pic with that lens...
Good work mate! / Hyvää työtä äijjä! Mun kanavalle on tulos testivideota GH5 + Kipon Baveyes x0.7 EF-MFT AF II + Sigma 18-35mm Art. En tiä onko Metabonesin speedboosterilla samaa ongelmaa, mutta täydellä aukolla lähes kaikki lasit aika pehmeitä reunoilta, (lasit parempia esim. tuos täydenkennon 5DIII) Testasin: Canon 24-70mm f2.8 L + Sigma 50mm Art + Canon 85mm USM + Canon 100mm L Macro f2.8 myöskin varmistaakseni asiaa. Samoin täydellä aukolla aikas laitta chromaattiasta aberraatiota. Noh, video tulee mun kanavalle tuos alle viikon sisään kuitenkin! :) Toki hinta on speedboosteriin nähden 2x halvempi, että sikäli enemmän rahalle vastinetta kyllä tässä.
Ostin aikanaan metabonesin koska testeissä se näytti tarkemmalta, vaikka edullisempiakin oli tarjolla. En ole testannut ilman boosteria, että miltä tarkkuus näyttää täydellä aukolla, mutta tyytyväinen oon ollut.
Noissa kaikissa on omat huonot puolensa. Metabones ei myöskään ole virheetön, mutta uudemmat mallit suoriutuvat jo kohtuullisen hyvin, eikä esim. Ultraa vaivaa niin paljoa tuollainen soft focus -tyyppinen pehmeys täydellä aukolla. Kaikenlaista värisiirtymää silläkin kuitenkin esiintyy, joten kompromisseja täytyy tehdä. Itse suosin sekä linssitöntä että linssillistä adapteria eri tilanteisiin. GH5:lle uskallan antaa suosituksen Metabones Ultralle, joissain tapauksissa 35mm järjestelmiin tarkoitetuille objektiiveille Metabones XL:lle, sekä Zhongyi Lens Turbo II:lle. XL saattaa vinjetoida kuvanvakaimen toimiessa aika rajustikin joillain objektiiveilla ja LT II taas näyttää täydellä aukolla hieman diffuusoidulta.
I've learned a lot since buying your kit and watching your videos. I never heard of setting the shutter speed to 1/25 to improve low light shooting. I can't wait to experiment with what I've learned from this video. Thanks, Joo!!
Glad I came across this video because I ordered a LUMIX G85 and the only thing I was worried about was its inability for use in low lighting. Great tips on how to improve this! ThankYou!!!!
Vania Brewda you are wellcome. Good to be at service.
I love watching channels that are so low insubscriber count but content is sooooo good. you are definitely on your way to 100k in no time 🙏🏽
You had me subbed by 1 minute in, It was the music and cuts, I loved the audio levels. But I'm just an audio engineer guy. suuuuuupppppper informational. You put a lot of work into this and it shows.
Light travels through clear glass the same way - It doesn't matter if you have a 100 feet of glass or 1mm. If it's clear the light is the same.
A prime lens at f5.6 will let in the same amount of light as a 100mm telephoto at f5.6.
Source:
www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/content/prime-vs-zoom-can-you-tell-difference
You should do a comparison between the amount of noise from 4K vs the "6K" setting. Similar to what you did at the beginning when analyzing the clips, but more thorough.
I'm not sure what else is there to test. Colour noise, grain, makro blocking? What would you be interested of?
Yea those would be good. Also, how high the “6K” ISO can go still being useable vs normal 4K.
"Dark by Design," makes sense. Thanks for a thorough walkthrough and great examples/footage.
Congrats on reaching 1k. Next stop: 10k!
Thanks! It came faster than I thought. Next goal? ;-) 10k?
Hey, very cool explanation. I think this is something that popular opinion gets very wrong on RUclips. They all want to change night for day instead of just accepting dark frames and grounding those with a highlight or a reflection. Great explanation, Joonas. 👍🏻
Love the “DARK DAYS” music djshadow!!
Great video. 90% of the “expert” camera channels will bang on about 180° shutter angle laws bla bla. It is absolutely valid to vary your shutter speed and for 60p playback or any electronic stability, faster shutter is better.
I love this: "... so that your frame is dark by design not by bad decisions or exposure."
I have the same setup & great tips about colour space & dynamic range didn't know that!
Great video, congrats on reaching 1k! I'm sure you'll get many more 👍
I LOVE THOSE OLD NIKKOR LENS!!! I am so excited to see someone else with them (subbed for that alone)
Great tips and I enjoyed your breakdown of each scenario! 👍🏻
Nicely done. I'm rushing out to try.
The slower shutter speed in video is a great idea! Wish I thought of it!
You have great music taste my friend, you truly know how to build emotion with a grain of art ;)
Brilliant video, awesome that you're replying to questions. May times I see video and people have questions but they are never answered. This is a great way to keep people looking at your videos. Love it. Cheers from Canada.
Thanks Andy. There isn't too many comments so I have time to answer them now and then. I hope to have more time to do more videos as well.
god that music takes me back. great video just what i needed thanks
Another hard to understand aspect is that during low light you usually don't have much DR in the scene... Then why compressing all the input into V-Log is giving better results... compared to Cine-D you should have more space to record the same data...?
Just seeing this now. Thank you!
is it better to shot in 8 Bit or 10 Bit in Lowlightsituation with the GH5?
Great video ! Enjoyed watching it and you are very good at expalaining
Thanks for the video nice to compare the different profiles.
Thanks for the test and info. The technical comparisons were very useful. Thanks for sharing!
You are wellcome!
i really like your channel. so glad i found it. just got my GH5. thank you for your efforts.
As usual, very informative and professional, thanks!
great video. your video examples are super helpful for context.
Recently I saw someone use the CineV profile for the GH5. Tonight, I shot some night scenes using the CineV profile and 10-bit. The CineV profile has a much cleaner grain structure than Log. So, I brought my shots into DaVinci Resolve and I was able to pull out more shadow detail and tone down the saturation without losing the nice grain structure. I really like the colors and details I can capture with CineV.
I recommend shooting the same scene with both profiles and then lift (make bright) the shadows up from the cine-v profile to same level as the V-log or push v-log down (make dark) to the level of cine-v. I would assume they're not to be much of a difference in 10bits. 8bits maybe because V-log is not so good in 8bits. While you are at it, try to compare HLG, Cine-V and V-log. You might get interesting results.
Great and very informative video from you fellow tamperelainen! Keep up the good work!
That was what i looking for! Thanks!
Nice work! Interesting as always.
You should link @djshadow if you're using his music... Just saying...🙏
True that. I should add it to the description as well. In the end of the video it's there.
Yeaaah DjShadow! 😎😎😎
Very well done video Joonas! Thanks for putting this together. I've always stuck to the 180 degree rule, but maybe I'll try a slower frame rate.
Great and clear video, thanks man!!!
Did I miss what 1.8 zoom you were using with the speedbooster?
SpectreSoundStudios Hi, it's the sigma 18-35mm f1.8 Nikon glass that I use with the metabones adapter.
really nice video! Thanks!
Great Video 👌 these clips looks super awesome with the wet surfaces...now I'm excited to also shoot in dark conditions :D
Just subscribed. Excellent content. Keep it up!
Sure I'll try my best. Thanks!
Really enjoyed your tutorial. Nicely done :)
Subed
Thanks for the video. Getting the G85 this week. First Dslr.
You just got another subscriber from me! Sweet video
Nice work man
Keep going
Super video - great information!
I totally agree I have always used very comparable settings and have always paid attention to most important in my opinion and that is what's in front of my camera "The Lens" not so much on whether I have Canon, Sony or Panasonic. Balancing the triangle is the trick. I love Olympus 17mm f0.95 on my GH5 for low light.
There is a 0,95 native lens? Is it manual?
Yes. My bad I meant Voigtlander 17 mm 0.95 MFT & 25 MM both are amazing lenses Manual Focus and these are probably the sharpest best low light lenses for the GH5. I also have an Olympus I use for wide angle but it's not as good as Vogtlander it's a 12mm f1.8
Very Nice explanation!
Awesome video and nice background music. Thanks for sharing Subscribed
Great techniques, useful informations. Well done, thank you!
your videos are so helpful. just wanted to say thanks. I'm learning a lot from you. Also Panasonic should say thank you to you too. I'll probably upgrade from a6000 to gh5
so informative thanks so much for this video
Did you shoot both V-Log and Vivid in 10bit? why you say that Vivid has narrower color space?
Yep. all are 10bit 4k and 6k.
Vivid is recorded into rec709 colour space when v-log is panasonic v-gamut. v-gamut is larger than adobe RGB so it's rather large. You can see it sometime like with the clipping saturation on this video.
I'll do some videos about colour spaces and stuff soon.
Is Cine-D same as Vivid -> rec709? Yea explanation of relationship between color space and 8/10bit would be very nice. I thought that bits are what defines how many color gradiens you get... But apparently there is more to it.
Colour space is how what colours can be captured and how the colours are captured.
Dynamic range is how wide is the distance between totally black and totally white.
Bit depth is how many steps there is between totally white and totally black.
I'll do some videos about these later on to explain these all and what's the practical application of them
Dude, I love your videos! Thank you for sharing your awesome knowledge :) Much love!
I've always shot in V-log for my GH5 but If it gets too dark I read it is better to shoot non log profile. In that case which profile should i shoot in? since Log + ISO 800 is normally the highest ISO I will go to keep sharp image on an f1.4 lens. THANKS! and keep up the great work!
TOLife I’m not sure if there is really a difference in noise between profiles or is the noise just more visible in v-log. You can just push down in grading. I´ll do some test later on.
BTW very awesome presentation and content style. Your subscriber now. Thanks
Great video thanks❤️
What kind of speed booster are you using?
Awesome video. Thank you.
Which Nikon 1.4 lens was it exactly? Are you using Metabones Ultra?
very helpful! thank you
here before 15k views nice tut
this is a great great great tutorial thanks a lot!
wow, super quality contents, thank you, subed
Thanks man!
Not one mention of a light or exposure meter?
great tutorial again.
Good explanation of the perennial small sensor problem and the sensible methods of minimising noise. Interesting points made about noise at 6K, too.
The GH5 will never be a Sony A7RII (24000 ISO and little noise!) but your shots are as good as it gets, in my opinion. I had a GH4 and sold it because of the noise problem - above 800 ISO it was rubbish - but I will give the GH5 a go. The new GH5S is as yet untried but since my work is half stills and half video I may have to look at that too. Thanks for a clear and accurate presentation without the woffle!
Whit good noise reduction I would call 3200 iso usable on the gh5. Try it out with neat video noise removal plugin.
Thanks. I've used Neat before and it's very good. For some reason it was not that good on my GH4, but it was better than not using it. Perhaps the GH5 will be better. The GH5S promises to be much better in low light, so perhaps a de-noiser will not be required.
J.D. Hughes yes, there is a limit on how low light you really want to shoot. The neat video is really good at 3200. At 6400 the image starts to fall part. Test it out, my requirements are not that high, for I do videos mostly to web.
I did try it at 3200, but it is poor for film use, although the GH5 makes up for the lack with its other features, internal 10 bit 4-2-2 for instance. Used Neat again and it is an improvement, but still not clean enough above 800 ISO/ASA, although probably good for Vlogging. Anyway, what do I know, I'm just a retired director still wading through reels of 16/35mm film :)
J.D. Hughes I like to keep the iso at 400 or 800. It's the sharpest, but I would add 3200 (+neatvideo) if needed to the mix. :-)
I started shootin, at 6k, because premiere suddently started supportin, it. I'm loving the quality and now the difference in iso is really clear.
nice video mate
Thank you super informative!
Nice!Did you use a lut to vlog-l footage ?
Yes I used the LUT that I created on a previous episode. You can download it by joining my facebook messenger list. here joo.works/join
Excellent video, I learned a lot- my question is, can I use this type of set up on my older GH2?
Yes you can. The metabones should work on any m43 mount camera.
That's great news, thanks so much, btw- you have a great channel here- thanks for all your hard work and bringing people this great information, I will visit here often, cheers to you.
Beautiful
Really good.
hi my friend can you make settings for gh5 to instal to camera please and which lense is best for very clear video because i have problem with my video alway same noise is there i not understand please help me thank you
Great video
Great video! all things I do as well. all these camera people want the faster chips, the faster processors. if they learned how to use their cameras and lenses, it would look GREAT! subbed
What’s the name or link of the speed booster and lens ?
are you using a conversor to use nikon lens in lumix? witch one are you using?
I'm using the metabones speedbooster XL from Nikon to M4/3. It boosts light about 1 1/3
Can you see if this speedbooster is good because i dont have mutch money to buy a metabones
www.ebay.com/itm/Focal-Reducer-Speed-Booster-Adapter-Canon-EOS-EF-mount-lens-to-Micro-4-3-M43-GX7/151961866004?hash=item2361a20f14:g:7MMAAOSwGvhUE~mO
OH! That's super cheap. Too cheap to my liking. :-D I could test this out, but it will take time, for I'm traveling for 60 days and can't order stuff there.
well if you could test it it would be nice and I dont have rush on this matter. thank you for the help. I will try to find other stuff good and cheap :)
Subbed! good video!
What was the ISO in those shots?
um.. im here with a problem. i've bought my gh5 like 4 days ago, and.. it is freezing when i want to watch what i have got.. it just keep telling me "this motion image cannot be played", and when im trying to delet it, it says "this picture cannot be deleted" any solutions out there? coz i really love this camera a lot.. or should i return it back, and buy another one?
Great Video Joo Thank you! But what the hack is vivid?
What is your fps if your shooting on 1/25 shutter?
Great tips
Really nice video
v-log you actually have less data per stop, but more stops of DR - So rec709 profiles will have more color information in the important stops - You are calling more accurate, but that is not really the case. Vivid ( not my preference ) will have more color information in the stops that carry the color in night shooting.
Thanks for the explanation. :)
Nice to see Tampere at night - maybe a good idea to stop for a while when passing on E12...
Great informative video makes me want to take my gh5 out at night time
I have gh5 and metabones speedbooster with canon mount as I use Canon lenses I am wondering should I buy rokinon 12 mm with canon mount or micro 3/4 mount ... would speedbooster improve that lens even more?
VidooK ProductionS if you have the metobones, then get the canon mount one. The metabones one will make the lens wider, fastere, sharper and more bokelisous, and you can still just get your self a normal adapter (not speedbooster) and use the lens as it would look on a m4\3 mount.
Joo.Works Thanks Brother I thought so
Your are wellcome. :-)
Could You please help me with this question?; I have bought Samyang f2.0/12 mm NCS CS Ultra wide angle for mirrorless and I wanted to attach it to My Panasonic gh 5 via metabones speedbooster . Lens arrived today and I am surprised as it doesn't fit to metabones as well as it doesn't fit directly to the camera ... I realised that it is conon m mount and metabones is ef mount I am so confused and cannot find the answer in interent I can see there are adapters from ef lens to M body but I cannot find any from m lens to ef body would You please help Me ?
VidooK ProductionS I'm sorry, it migth just be that there is no adapter for that. Lenses with different mounts need a different distance from the sensor, because of focusing. For example canon ef need to be further from the sensor than m43 lenses Ef needs space for the mirror to fit in between. Because in the m43 there is no mirror that space can be used to fit an adapter in stead. So if the m-mount needs less space than the ef mount, then there is no space in between to fit the adpter.
There might be some options of abapters with a diopter to change the focus distance, but they will be more expesive most likely.
I wound return the lens and get the right one, or try and sell it. :-\
What mics did you use?
In this one I have a Rode lavmic on me to get my voice.
Congratulations!
Just out of interest - what is the zoom lens you take off the GH5 in the video? Wasn’t aware you could get a zoom lens for M43 that went to f/1.8.
It's sigma 18-35mm f1.8 Nikon aps-c lens, but with metabones you can use it in m43 mount. The speedbooster will make it even faster f1.1 lens, but when it's zoom it isn't that fast. It's about the same as f1.4 native prime.
Did you use noise reduction in post?
Romain Romero nope. :-) not for these.
What you think is best native lens for lowlight filmmaking if u pick only one
Hmm... Just one... No matter the price? Well then The Voigtlander f/0.95 25mm. Or some other focal length. It's manual, but native. I have not tested it, but seen some great looking footage from it.
If you need autofocus... I had a leica 25mm 1.4 lens that was pretty much as fast as my Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 with the speed booster. It's a fantastic lens. Mine was stolen. Someone else understood the quality of it. That one you can get rather cheap from the internets.
ok thankxz! yes autofocus ... what you think 15mm f1.7 im leaning towards it...And im sorry for your lost too...i hope they take his jail mugshot pic with that lens...
Really good asnalysis.
Good work mate! / Hyvää työtä äijjä!
Mun kanavalle on tulos testivideota GH5 + Kipon Baveyes x0.7 EF-MFT AF II + Sigma 18-35mm Art.
En tiä onko Metabonesin speedboosterilla samaa ongelmaa, mutta täydellä aukolla lähes kaikki lasit aika pehmeitä reunoilta, (lasit parempia esim. tuos täydenkennon 5DIII)
Testasin: Canon 24-70mm f2.8 L + Sigma 50mm Art + Canon 85mm USM + Canon 100mm L Macro f2.8 myöskin varmistaakseni asiaa.
Samoin täydellä aukolla aikas laitta chromaattiasta aberraatiota.
Noh, video tulee mun kanavalle tuos alle viikon sisään kuitenkin! :)
Toki hinta on speedboosteriin nähden 2x halvempi, että sikäli enemmän rahalle vastinetta kyllä tässä.
Ostin aikanaan metabonesin koska testeissä se näytti tarkemmalta, vaikka edullisempiakin oli tarjolla. En ole testannut ilman boosteria, että miltä tarkkuus näyttää täydellä aukolla, mutta tyytyväinen oon ollut.
Joo.Works Kyllä. Päivitän varmaan speedboosteriin joskus jos sattuu investointi budjettia riittämään.
Noissa kaikissa on omat huonot puolensa. Metabones ei myöskään ole virheetön, mutta uudemmat mallit suoriutuvat jo kohtuullisen hyvin, eikä esim. Ultraa vaivaa niin paljoa tuollainen soft focus -tyyppinen pehmeys täydellä aukolla. Kaikenlaista värisiirtymää silläkin kuitenkin esiintyy, joten kompromisseja täytyy tehdä. Itse suosin sekä linssitöntä että linssillistä adapteria eri tilanteisiin. GH5:lle uskallan antaa suosituksen Metabones Ultralle, joissain tapauksissa 35mm järjestelmiin tarkoitetuille objektiiveille Metabones XL:lle, sekä Zhongyi Lens Turbo II:lle. XL saattaa vinjetoida kuvanvakaimen toimiessa aika rajustikin joillain objektiiveilla ja LT II taas näyttää täydellä aukolla hieman diffuusoidulta.
Good shit. Always informative... Keep it up my man. And remember always record the police..
How did you get those entire shots in focus @ 1.4 aperture?
When the subjects are far enough the depth of field gets wider. So for example the houses were far enough for the depth to wrap them all.
Thank you for the response! You were using the Sigma 18-35, right?
Because it's wider it will have more depth of focus. :-)
Damn you have to monetized your great contents!