Prehistoric and Ancient Japan
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 июл 2024
- Learn about the earliest days of Japanese civilization, from the prehistoric Jōmon period to the ancient Kofun period.
00:00 Intro
00:03 Jōmon period
01:33 Yayoi period
02:48 Kofun period
04:59 Asuka period
05:27 End credits
Music:
-"Japanese Garden" by purple-planet.com
-"Otogi 3" by PeriTune
Sources:
-de Boer, Elisabeth et al. (2020): www.cambridge.org/core/journa...
-Friday, Karl F. (2017): books.google.com/books?id=Xgk...
-Gakuhari, Takashi et al. (2019): www.biorxiv.org/content/10.11...
-Martinec, Jakub (2021): www.researchgate.net/profile/...
-Murray, DM (2020): www.osaka.com/info/osaka-hist...
-Noshiro, Shuichi & Sasaki, Yuka (2014): www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Rhee, Song-nai et al. (2021): library.oapen.org/handle/20.5...
Uchiyama, Junzo (2011): library.oapen.org/bitstream/h...
I am majoring in history at a university in Japan (still a first-year student), and I would like to share my opinion as a history enthusiast.
I feel that this video is the closest to being accurate among the videos about ancient Japan posted by the former Dragon Historian.
As many people know, the oldest historical records in Japan regarding ancient history are the "Kojiki" and "Nihon Shoki," which were compiled in the court of the "Ritsuryo period" that already established a local administrative system in the early 8th century, encompassing mythological elements.
Therefore, many studies tend to rely on scarce records of the Three Kingdoms and textual materials about the Eastern Barbarians (especially from the Southern Dynasties in China). However, this often leads to significant misunderstandings influenced by Sinocentric biases and geographical distance, compounded by the fact that historical records from the period of the Sixteen Kingdoms in China barely mention Japan. Consequently, there is a significant problem in the Japanese archaeological community regarding the "Lost Fourth Century," where there are no textual records whatsoever.
Unfortunately, around this fourth century, the famous "Yamatai Kingdom" disappeared, and the "Yamato Kingship" emerged, making it extremely challenging to trace the origins of Japan.
Therefore, we must explore archaeological evidence, linguistic traces left in place names, and historical facts embedded within mythical embellishments. However, many important burial mounds with archaeological significance are under the jurisdiction of the Imperial Household Agency, making investigations difficult. Additionally, linguistic approaches are often marred by inadequate linguistic education, and myths are met with strong scholarly resistance post-WW2 due to their various elements being exploited by imperialism.
But fortunately, at the end of last year, a "monumental site unparalleled in comparison with other regions" from the "Lost Fourth Century" was discovered in the Nara Basin. This excites me as it will likely lead to further advancements in the study of ancient Japanese history 😊.
Currently, Japan's historical society is aging rapidly and becoming increasingly rigid, and there isn't much activity on the internet by private individuals driven by youthful and pure historical curiosity like Dragon. (Japan's historical entertainment mainly focuses on the Warring States period, and ancient history and post-war history are often treated superficially due to the structure of the education system, and people's interest in world history is even weaker 😭).
Moreover, concepts like "mapping" are not as widespread as in South Korea. Although I am not a pure Japanese person (purity is valued by some right-wing Japanese), I am extremely pleased that Dragon addressed such a niche period in Japanese ancient history.
I'm with you there, my theory is that Jinmu was basically one of the warlords that are defeated by Qin Army of china when they unite the whole "Zhongguo" lands and Jinmu tribes have to migrate to Japan island
To be honest, I just kind of believe that Yamatai is Yamato and that Queen Himiko and Queen Iyo are just ancestors of the Imperial Family. I feel like it should be pretty obvious but people like to obfuscate it as it hasn’t 100% been confirmed. But I think using our minds, that is really the only answer. I assume there is an unbroken imperial line going back to the 200s. Also, even if Emperor Keitai was a fake emperor, he married the sister of the previous Emperor and daughter of the Emperor before the the previous so the lineage would still continue
It's amazing how much of the historical record of Japan's early history doesn't originate within Japan itself, but rather Chinese and Korean records.
문자가 4~5세기에 전파됐기 때문에 그 전까진 기록 대신에 구전을 통할 수 밖에 없었겠지요
Because the early Japanese did not appear to have any script (as far as we know). They "adopted" it from China (via Korea) in the 6th century. Anything before is pure Archeology and "foreign" records.
Because they were pretty much tribal people
because they originally came from the area of present day china and korea but just left there after those lands they lived in got conquered
Same with Korea, most of their record come from chinese record.
It has so splendid quality and interpretation, I think.
If there are some points to to fix, it might be that "Nakoku (奴國)" would be in native Japanese "Na no agata (儺縣)", and Izumo would exist from c.280 because 投馬國 can be attested as Izumo (and also Kibi which was called 支惟國), and the northern limit of Koshi would be on Niigata city nowadays (there was a large lagoon at that time and Echigo plain is divided culturally and linguistically in north and south even now).
One thing to note is that the Yayoi are not the only ancestors of the Japanese. Jomon people and later immigrants from places in East Asia apart from where the Yayoi immigrants came from also add into the Japanese genetic and cultural heritage. Additionally, new research indicates that the yayoi era was a cultural change first, with many Jomon people adopting new culture without genetic change, followed by admixture between the populations throughout time.
We don't know the origin of Japanese myths and while some share broad similarities to other myths we can't exactly date them - myths often include things like rice or bronze, but we don't know that that isn't a later change to an earlier myth. Some scholars suggest a North/South myth divide, with older myths sharing more similiarty to the southern cultures in east asia and dating potentially to the Jomon era, while the northern myths share similarity to North east asia and thus likely originate in the Yayoi or Kofun eras. Additionally, whether the Japanese language was brought in the yayoi era or already existed in the Japanese Islands in the Jomon era is hotly debated.
That being said, mainstream Japanese myth doesn't really have anything that could be construed as cultural memory of a migration to the Japanese isles. The Okinawan people do believe in a mythical land across the sea they came from, but that could be mainland Japan as well (where they did come from most directly). Additionally, okinawan people have higher levels of jomon ancestry and so there's no guarantee of the time depth of that myth either.
look into the dongyi, huai yi, nan yi, they will be the key to the ancient history of the proto-japonic people. they are a big ? timehole in the timeline nearest to where proto-japonic were around mumun pottery times
Jomon and Ainu were Black. Japanese history is Black History. We will reclaim our heritage 🇿🇦✊
@@cudanmang_theog the Minatogawa man is the true Black master race. Once you go Black, you never go back! Get Blacked! ☠☠☠
@@cudanmang_theog you afrocentrist makes me cringe. Having a dark/black skin doesn't make you an african but thanks for the jokes
@@cudanmang_theog thanks for the laugh
Very interesting. My favorite period of Japanese (pre)history. There's still so many questions.
Cool thanks
Hey Mr. Kim, do you have Discord?
김 선생님, 디스코드가 있나요? p.s. 항상 최고 퀄리티의 영상을 만들어 주시네요 :)
can you do history of yunnan pls its so undercover and im so interesting about history of my homeland
A new Japan video coming?
Can you continue up to the start of the shogunate
Goguryeo(高句驪, 고구려) (or Korea(高驪, 고려))'s founder was from Buyeo(扶餘, 부여). Furthermore, Baekje(百濟, 백제) used Southern Buyeo(南扶餘, 남부여) as its country name for a while(about 6 century), and its king's surname was Buyeo. After Baekje fell, one of Buyeo (as surname) family received new surname, Kudaranokonikisi(百濟王氏,くだらのこにきしし), from Jito Japanese king(持統 天皇). Nowadays, Kudarao shrine(百濟王 神社, くだらおうじんじゃ) in Japan is a temple for Buyeo clan(氏族). Probably, it would be interesting for Korean and Japanese to abandon nationalism, and explore the beginning and end of Baekje.
秀吉の朝鮮出兵は日本の戦力のうち30％で行われた小規模な戦争でしたが韓国は人口の3分の1を喪失し国土は荒れ再起不能になるほど弱かったのになぜ嘘をつくのでしょうか？？？
The more you learn about Japan and Korea, the closer both nations are. They used to be one family. That's why their nationalisms seem dumb and childish.
@@ryanlee2091Eh the one family thing might be too much but certainly their people have shared more history than they realise but guess propaganda through their schools and lack of historical memory just prevents them to move forward in a respectful way.
@@quiquemarquez3211 No, the Altaic theory may be more credible after all. Dangun and Jimmu were of the same people.
What South Korea Doesn't Want to See (Janggubong Ancient Tomb) There is a Janggubong Ancient Tomb in Haenam, Jeollanam-do, South Korea. It is the largest ancient tomb on the Korean Peninsula. Excavations were conducted here from October 2020 to February 2021. Investigations were conducted in the outer tomb and inside the stone chamber. South Korean archaeologists are said to have been deeply shocked by this survey. "This is going to be bad..." Because it was made and had the same impression as KOFUN ("ancient grave", megalithic tombs or Tumulus) in Kyushu, Japan. The Janggubong Ancient Tomb is a keyhole-shaped burial mound estimated to have been built in the 6th century. On the other hand, keyhole-shaped burial mounds called Kofun appeared in Japan in the 3rd century, 300 years ago. Looking at it this way, the keyhole-shaped burial mounds (Kofun) should have originated in Japan and spread to the Korean Peninsula. That means that the southernmost Janggubong Ancient Tomb in South Korea may be the tomb of a Japanese ruler. Among Japanese intellectuals, there are those who preach the Mimana Nihonfu theory that ``Japan ruled the southern part of the Korean Peninsula from the 4th to 6th centuries.'' (Mimana Nihonfu; or Yamato no Mikotomochi is the governing institution of Japan which is said to have been located in Mimana in the southern area of the Korean Peninsula in ancient times.) This finding supports that theory. Archaeologists in South Korea stopped excavating the Janggubong Burial Mound halfway through and closed it again. The ostensible reason was "because of Covid-19." In Japan, "Put a lid on something that stinks." (same meaning as ``Sweep the trouble under the carpet.''), but it probably refers to this kind of time. The more Korean archaeologists look into this South Korean Kofun, the more evidence they may come up with that it is an ancient Japanese tomb. This must be unbearable for Koreans. Once it is established that this is an ancient Japanese tomb, one must admit that the southern part of the Korean peninsula was part of Japan in the 4th to 6th centuries. Such a thing is absolutely disgusting for South Koreans. A professor of history at Seoul National University said, "We need to carefully determine whether the people buried in the Janggubong Ancient Tomb are Koreans or Japanese." If you stop the excavation in the middle, you can leave room for saying, "That place might be a Korean tomb." In South Korea, people have been taught that "In ancient times, Korea was more advanced in culture and technology than Japan. Koreans cannot be ruled by the Japanese, who were behind in everything!" . Janggubong Ancient Tomb has the power to blow away such Korean teachings. For South Koreans, the inside of an ancient burial mound is truly "something that must not be seen." South Korean government officials and social activists have often said, ``Japan has not reflected on its past. However, South Korea seems to be reluctant to learn true history. The excavation of the Janggubong Ancient Tomb did not involve media from South Korea. For South Korea, it will be troublesome if something bad is found and reported.
The entire history of the Caucasus would be amazing
Yes yes yes
What language do you think the Jomon in Honshu and the southern islands were speaking?.
지형지도가 생기니까 한층 더 몰입됩니다..
I’m using ChatGPT as a translator.
1:19
The commonly held belief is that the Yayoi period began in the 7th century BCE, but there are many dissenting opinions. (Interestingly, as research progresses, the estimated starting date advances by a century every decade 😂) This is because the definition of the Yayoi period refers to a time when the culture centered around Yayoi pottery and rice cultivation spread. However, the tricky part is that even during the Jomon period, which was characterized by settled hunter-gatherer lifestyles, rice cultivation was practiced in some regions. Furthermore, the degree of penetration of Yayoi culture varies by region, leading to confusion between the Jomon and Yayoi periods.
Moreover, the genetic differences between Yayoi and Jomon people also contribute to the confusion in dating. The disseminators of Yayoi culture who came from the sea were probably speakers of the Japonic proto-language, but the spread of their culture, language, and genes were not necessarily concurrent. The distribution of Yayoi pottery, Yayoi human remains, and Japanese place names does not align. Thus, there were people who were descendants of Jomon culture living in the Yayoi culture, for example.
Especially troublesome is the Tohoku (northeastern) region. While it is indeed a Yayoi culture area centered around Yayoi pottery and paddy cultivation (contrary to Dragon's video), the human remains are largely Jomon-like, and the place names have origins in Ainu language. Furthermore, in the southern part, although the human remains are Jomon-like, the place names can be interpreted as Japanese Eastern dialect (which is assumed to be a pre-Japonic language before the disappearance of Japonic proto-language). Moreover, remarkably, just as there were significant regional differences between Jomon cultures, there are also significant differences between eastern Yayoi culture and western Yayoi culture (the so-called "Yayoi culture"). Therefore, this regional culture is referred to as "Eastern Yayoi culture" or "Epipaleolithic Jomon culture", but the choice of words significantly affects the impression, doesn't it? (Especially the term "Epipaleolithic Jomon culture" invites confusion with the similarly named "zoku Jomon culture" in Hokkaido) (And indeed, Dragon confuses them).
Above all, what's most important is that with the arrival of the Yayoi period, concepts such as villages and countries emerged, giving rise to a society with warfare. In this regard, the Tohoku region was within the Yayoi cultural sphere, but Hokkaido was different. Interestingly, from the late Yayoi period to the early Kofun period (5th century), Yayoi culture retreated to the southern part of the Tohoku region, and the northern part of the Tohoku region entered the zoku Jomon cultural sphere. (Also, during this period, zoku Jomon culture spread to the southern Kuril Islands, whereas it had not spread there before.) However, if cultural transition occurred here, did they become genetically different people? Did they start speaking a different language? This is a very tricky issue. This would be easier to understand by imagining the Gauls under Roman rule and the Bretons or the southern regions of China under Qin dynasty rule.
Furthermore, in the Tohoku region, there was a process of acceptance and abandonment of the political culture derived from the Yamato kingship, which resulted in the emergence of the distinctive ethnic group called the Emishi. (However, it is necessary to note that the name "Emishi" may have been given based on the Sinocentric view and ignores cultural and linguistic differences. Also, in their region, there were probably complex language changes like those in Cornwall, and the distribution of late Kofun is also characteristic.)
2:21
The theory that Yamatai-koku is located in Oita Prefecture is very unorthodox. (As the location of Yamatai-koku is unknown, except for the mainstream theories of "Kyushu (Tsukushi) theory", "Kinai theory", and "Nomadic theory" as explained in the video, any other theories are considered non-mainstream in the Japanese academic world.) Nevertheless, I find this theory very intriguing because it is said to be the starting point of Emperor Jimmu's expedition to Yamato in Japanese mythology.
This is probably a compromise made because the territory of Na no Kuni was set in northern Kyushu, but at that time, in addition to Na no Kuni (which is narrower than shown in the video), there were other countries such as Ito-koku and Matsura-koku, which were adjacent to each other a few kilometers apart. The territories of the northern Kyushu kingdoms shown in Chinese historical records were very small, covering only a few hundred square kilometers, and the "Kyushu theory" assumes that Yamatai-koku existed further inland (as shown in the video, in the area indicated as Na no Kuni). And probably at the same time as the center site presumed to be Yamatai-koku, there is also the "Marukome Site" in the Nara Basin (Yamato Basin), which is called a "site of a powerful kingdom comparable to a local one", which is probably the ancestor of the later "Yamato kingship", but it is unclear if Yamatai-koku corresponds to this. If it is assumed that this is Yamatai-koku, it becomes the "Kinai theory".
2:57
In this context, the presence of regional kingdoms other than the Yamato kingship is indicated on the map, but whether these were independent kingdoms is a significant issue.
Firstly, unlike the later Warring States period where various states vied for supremacy, the Yayoi and Kofun periods were not characterized by such interstate competition. They are often compared to the Greek Dark Ages and the Classical period, but they differ significantly. While the Yayoi period was an early period when the concept of a nation-state was beginning to form, the scale of the archaeological sites in northern Kyushu and Kinai is overwhelming, and other sites are too small to support regional hegemony. Moreover, although the Kofun period saw the existence of nation-states, the Yamato kingship already had indirect control over much of it, as evidenced by the political structures and artifacts derived from the "Yamato kingship" found in the Kofun. This is akin to the First Babylonian Dynasty controlling cities such as Uruk and Nippur.
Furthermore, the Yamato kingship used the term "kuni (nation)" to refer to concepts such as "independent state," "vassal state," "administrative division," and "(cultural) region without a unified state," and it is possible that a single "kuni" fluctuated between these definitions over time. However, Japanese historical records do not reflect this transition. Nevertheless, differences from archaeology can help us imagine the historical facts. In the reign of Emperor Nintoku, the 13th Emperor, decades before the reign of Emperor Ōjin, it is said that "kuni" were established from the southern part of the Tohoku region to the northern part of Kyushu in domestic historical records. And indeed, the distribution of kofun in that region exists. However, archaeological evidence does not support this until the time of Emperor Yūryaku, the 21st Emperor. It would be easier to understand this by imagining Roman allied cities and colonies. They did not distinguish between them.
Similarly, in southern Kyushu, kuni were established, and kofun were distributed, but they disappeared from historical records and kofun distribution ceased as the 6th century approached. And at the beginning of the 6th century, a people called "Hayato" appeared. And in the 7th century, they were conquered and disappeared. In other words, there were ethnic groups that accepted and then abandoned political cultures such as Yayoi and kofun, and their characteristics are derived from that.
Therefore, it is unlikely that people called "Hayato" existed in southern Kyushu in the 4th century. (Although their ancestors may have resided there, they were not people with the culture of Hayato derived from Yayoi and kofun cultures.)
Additionally, the Kumaso appear only in Japanese mythology, and it is inappropriate to apply them to the people of southern Kyushu. (However, there is currently no other term to refer to the people of southern Kyushu 😢)
4:21
Here, the expansion of the Yamato kingship's domain from east to west is depicted very faithfully and accurately to archaeological findings.
Also, it is accurate that the Japan Sea coastal region centered around Lake Biwa was not under the control of the monarchy.
Interestingly, in Japanese mythology, there appears a figure called "Hikoimasu," who holds a kingdom in the Japan Sea coastal region as the brother of Emperor Suinin. His family and the imperial family were strongly linked by marriage alliances and supported the expansion of the Yamato kingship from east to west, but there is no depiction of them "coming under the rule of the Yamato kingship." In administrative history, their ruled territory is treated as one region under the Yamato kingship and was deeply connected to Yamato economically and informationally, yet no administrators were placed until later periods, indicating this. (And probably when considering non-Yamato kingship during the Kofun period, there are no other candidates besides them. Izumo and Kyushu were firmly under administrative control, and Keno was a brotherly founding by the descendants of the Emperor.)
However, it is too inappropriate to depict them as "Yayoi tribes" in that region. The Yayoi culture mainly existed until the 3rd century, and after that, kofun, as political structures, became significant archaeologically. Certainly, the residents of that region were descendants of Yayoi culture people, and their daily life was Yayoi culture-like, and they probably spoke Proto-Japanese. However, the same applies to the Yamato kingship and other countries such as Kibi and Keno. In other words, while the term "Yayoi people" accurately represents the "bearers of Yayoi culture in the Japanese archipelago before the establishment of political states," it is inappropriate to represent people in regions where political states were already established.
And kofun were distributed from the southern part of the Tohoku region (only one place in the northern part) to the northern part of Kyushu (only in the southern part in the early period). In other words, the "Yayoi people" who were not incorporated into political states no longer existed.
I found only that Shujujin lived just on Tanegashima, whence you know about their presence on Yakushima (or they were not live on Yakushima but it looks like this on your cartes.
Which font do you use?
일본사 리메이크 들어가시는건가요?
I wish, Gorguyeo was still alive and North Korea still has the good old territories back from China and then, reunification.
shuju가 무엇입니까? 야쿠시마섬과 다네가섬에 표시되어 있는데...
I think Jeulmun is extended far to north korea or even at lower Manchuria
Himiko might have sounded like Pem(different kind of i?)ka, if one considers old chinese reconstructions....
영상에 나온 것처럼 3세기 당시 야마타이국을 규슈 지방으로 비정하기도 하지만, 후대의 야마토 정권과 동일한 실체로 보아 긴키 지방에 비정하는 학설이 유력하긴 합니다. 삼국지 동이전 왜인조에 적힌 국명인 야마대(邪馬臺)를 후기 상고한어 재구음으로 읽으면 대략 /*ja mˤraʔ dˤə/ "야마더" 정도가 되는데, 이는 야마토의 상대 일본어 발음 "야마터(yamatö)"와 일치하기 때문이죠.
또 야마타이국의 휘하에 있던 왜계 소국들 가운데 대마국(對馬國: 쓰시마섬), 일지국(一支國: 이키섬)과 노국(奴國: 후쿠오카)에는 비노모리(卑奴母離)라는 부관명이 있었는데, 이 비노모리는 '히나모리'의 상대 일본어 발음을 전사한 것으로 여겨집니다. 히나모리는 일본어로 시골이나 외딴 지역을 뜻하는 鄙(ひな)와 지키는 사람을 뜻하는 守(もり)의 합성어로 분석되고, 실제로 나라 시대와 헤이안 시대에도 이수(夷守: 훈차) 또는 비나모리(比奈毛里: 음차)로 표기되어 국경 수비를 맡은 군관의 직명으로 쓰였습니다. 이를 통해 야마타이국이 쓰시마섬, 이키섬과 후쿠오카를 변방 지역으로 여겼음을 알 수 있으며, 그 위치도 후쿠오카가 위치한 규슈 섬보다는 비교적 멀리 떨어진 긴키 쪽에 있었다고 보는 편이 자연스러운 해석일 것입니다.
여담으로 야마타이국 여왕 히미코의 이름은 현대 일본어에 굳이 대응시키자면 "히메코(ひめこ)"보다는 "히메(ひめ)"가 될 것으로 추정됩니다. 히미코의 마지막 글자 호(呼)는 어디까지나 현대 일본 한자음 기준으로 "코"로 읽힐 뿐, 후한 시대까지는 /*xa/ "하"에 가깝게 발음됐기 때문입니다.(Schuessler 2007) 아이를 뜻하는 코(子)가 상대 일본어에서도 "코(kô)"였던 것과는 대비됩니다. 히메(姬)는 상대 일본어에서 둘째 음절에 이중 모음이 포함된 "비미에(pʲimʲe)"로 발음됐으므로, 스벤 오스테르캄프 교수의 의견대로 선대 어형을 '비미아(*pimia)'로 재구할 수 있다면 呼 /*xa/는 맨 끝의 "-a"를 덧붙여 표기한 글자라는 해석이 가능해집니다.
bro arakan kingdom pls ❤❤❤❤❤
Banzai🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵
오오오 일본사
한국인이지만 '동해'라는 단어에 다들 그렇게 민감하게 반응하는 이유를 모르겠습니다. 당장 우리나라의 이름을 붙인 대한해협도 있고 동중국해, 남중국해, 인도양 등등 국명에서 따온 바다 이름들은 많은데 말이죠. 당장 오호츠크 해도 러시아의 오호츠크라는 도시가 있고 아드리아 해도 이탈리아의 도시 이름인데 주변국들이 뭐라하는 케이스는 못봤네요. 독도야 엄연히 한국 땅이니 왈가왈부하는 거 자체가 의미가 없다지만 동해는 모르겠어요.
한국정부의 과도한 반일교육 때문에 발생한 일본거부증 때문이 아닐까요?
외국 살다가 오랜만에 한국에 입국해서 박물관에 가보니, 일본에 대한 편파적, 차별적인 기술로 가득 차있어서 깜짝 놀랐습니다
어린시절 부터 이러한 한국의 교과서나 메디어에 접하면서 크면, 일본인 혐오자가 되지 않을 수가 없다고 느꼈습니다
외국에 나가보니 이런 식으로 어떤 나라나 단체를, 이를 악물고 혐오하는 장면은 단 한 번도 찾아 볼 수가 없었습니다
“일본인 한테는 사기를 쳐도 된다
일본인이 하는 말은 무조건 날조다
일본인에게 피해를 끼치면 영웅이다
일본이 하는 일은 모두 반대 해야 한다”
객관적으로 생각했을 때 위 같은 한국인의 본능은, 국제사회에서 크나큰 문제를 불러 일으킬 수 있다고 생각합니다
동아시아의 평화를 위해,
반일교육이 완화 되기를,
간절히 바라고 있습니다.
What South Korea Doesn't Want to See (Janggubong Ancient Tomb) There is a Janggubong Ancient Tomb in Haenam, Jeollanam-do, South Korea. It is the largest ancient tomb on the Korean Peninsula. Excavations were conducted here from October 2020 to February 2021. Investigations were conducted in the outer tomb and inside the stone chamber. South Korean archaeologists are said to have been deeply shocked by this survey. "This is going to be bad..." Because it was made and had the same impression as KOFUN ("ancient grave", megalithic tombs or Tumulus) in Kyushu, Japan. The Janggubong Ancient Tomb is a keyhole-shaped burial mound estimated to have been built in the 6th century. On the other hand, keyhole-shaped burial mounds called Kofun appeared in Japan in the 3rd century, 300 years ago. Looking at it this way, the keyhole-shaped burial mounds (Kofun) should have originated in Japan and spread to the Korean Peninsula. That means that the southernmost Janggubong Ancient Tomb in South Korea may be the tomb of a Japanese ruler. Among Japanese intellectuals, there are those who preach the Mimana Nihonfu theory that ``Japan ruled the southern part of the Korean Peninsula from the 4th to 6th centuries.'' (Mimana Nihonfu; or Yamato no Mikotomochi is the governing institution of Japan which is said to have been located in Mimana in the southern area of the Korean Peninsula in ancient times.) This finding supports that theory. Archaeologists in South Korea stopped excavating the Janggubong Burial Mound halfway through and closed it again. The ostensible reason was "because of Covid-19." In Japan, "Put a lid on something that stinks." (same meaning as ``Sweep the trouble under the carpet.''), but it probably refers to this kind of time. The more Korean archaeologists look into this South Korean Kofun, the more evidence they may come up with that it is an ancient Japanese tomb. This must be unbearable for Koreans. Once it is established that this is an ancient Japanese tomb, one must admit that the southern part of the Korean peninsula was part of Japan in the 4th to 6th centuries. Such a thing is absolutely disgusting for South Koreans. A professor of history at Seoul National University said, "We need to carefully determine whether the people buried in the Janggubong Ancient Tomb are Koreans or Japanese." If you stop the excavation in the middle, you can leave room for saying, "That place might be a Korean tomb." In South Korea, people have been taught that "In ancient times, Korea was more advanced in culture and technology than Japan. Koreans cannot be ruled by the Japanese, who were behind in everything!" . Janggubong Ancient Tomb has the power to blow away such Korean teachings. For South Koreans, the inside of an ancient burial mound is truly "something that must not be seen." South Korean government officials and social activists have often said, ``Japan has not reflected on its past. However, South Korea seems to be reluctant to learn true history. The excavation of the Janggubong Ancient Tomb did not involve media from South Korea. For South Korea, it will be troublesome if something bad is found and reported.
@@ChianMindoSagi 어느 박물관에 갔길래요?
Make video about Ukraine pls
Make a video about the ancient history of Bangladesh(Bengal) every year..Plz 🙏🇧🇩
畿内説と九州説が一気に九州説の方向にいったんですよね
what about ryukyu? my poor ruuciuu
Also history of the North and South Koreas.
山所 Yamato Mountain Place Land!!!
山所 Yamato 山所 Yamato 山所 Yamato 山所 Yamato 山所 Yamato 山所 Yamato
There was no such thing as Gojoseon.
Cry about it 😂
Then why Chinese historians recorded it as a country
@@jarang3304 朝鮮人が勝手に書き加えただけだろｗｗｗｗ
@@jarang3304 朝鮮人お得意のご都合解釈と書き加えただけだろｗｗｗｗｗ
Gojoseon appears several times in China's ancient history books
They have diplomatic relations with the Yan dynasty several times and are defeated in a war with the Han dynasty(bce 109~108) and destroyed
Please explain what evidence you have that there was no Gojoseon
The original Asians were Black. The Shang dynasty was founded by a black Kemetic Egyptian princess
Yes bro, i'm the last kazekage from hidden village of the den.
we wuz Tojo and shieeettt
@@danangarifwidodolol
A common myth is a theory created by Japanese communists in the 1970s. Japanese communists wanted to make Japan a communist country, but as Japan's economy grew and became wealthy, the Japanese lost interest in communism. Ryu Ota, a Japanese communist, tried to carry out a communist revolution in Japan using the theory of revolution for the poor. They created the Yayoi people and the Jomon people and used the Ainu people, but their theory has been proven to be a lie based on the history of primary information sources and the development of genetic analysis technology in molecular biology. So they repeated false explanations to people who didn't know about the situation.
According to molecular biology genetic analysis, Japanese haplogroups are unique to Japan and are different from the mainland Chinese and Korean populations. Jomon and Yayoi are period classifications, not racial classifications. Japanese communists fabricated Yayoi bones. In the 1970s, they didn't have access to photo-editing software, so they used photocopiers to edit photos of the bones. Therefore, photographs of bones believed to be Yayoi people are bilaterally symmetrical. Genetic analysis has revealed that the Ainu are a mixture of Okhotsk people, Nivkh people, and Japanese people. It was founded in the 13th century, when they fled to Japan from the Mongol invasion. Therefore, Ainu bones have not been excavated from old strata.
The language of Japan is the Japanese-Ryuan language family, which is unique to Japan. If ethnic groups from the continent became the ruling class, Japan would become a Sino-Tibetan or Altaic language family, but that is not the case.
The Sannai Maruyama Ruins, a 5,900-year-old ruin in Hokkaido, contains many Japanese-style tombs and ornaments. The jade used for ornaments can only be found in mainland Japan, and it is known that Japanese people have lived there since ancient times.
When you ask Japanese communists these things, they are silent. They also collaborate with North Korea's Juche ideology.
Original Japanese were black Afrikans
일본 환빠는 좀 신기하네
What South Korea Doesn't Want to See (Janggubong Ancient Tomb) There is a Janggubong Ancient Tomb in Haenam, Jeollanam-do, South Korea. It is the largest ancient tomb on the Korean Peninsula. Excavations were conducted here from October 2020 to February 2021. Investigations were conducted in the outer tomb and inside the stone chamber. South Korean archaeologists are said to have been deeply shocked by this survey. "This is going to be bad..." Because it was made and had the same impression as KOFUN ("ancient grave", megalithic tombs or Tumulus) in Kyushu, Japan. The Janggubong Ancient Tomb is a keyhole-shaped burial mound estimated to have been built in the 6th century. On the other hand, keyhole-shaped burial mounds called Kofun appeared in Japan in the 3rd century, 300 years ago. Looking at it this way, the keyhole-shaped burial mounds (Kofun) should have originated in Japan and spread to the Korean Peninsula. That means that the southernmost Janggubong Ancient Tomb in South Korea may be the tomb of a Japanese ruler. Among Japanese intellectuals, there are those who preach the Mimana Nihonfu theory that ``Japan ruled the southern part of the Korean Peninsula from the 4th to 6th centuries.'' (Mimana Nihonfu; or Yamato no Mikotomochi is the governing institution of Japan which is said to have been located in Mimana in the southern area of the Korean Peninsula in ancient times.) This finding supports that theory. Archaeologists in South Korea stopped excavating the Janggubong Burial Mound halfway through and closed it again. The ostensible reason was "because of Covid-19." In Japan, "Put a lid on something that stinks." (same meaning as ``Sweep the trouble under the carpet.''), but it probably refers to this kind of time. The more Korean archaeologists look into this South Korean Kofun, the more evidence they may come up with that it is an ancient Japanese tomb. This must be unbearable for Koreans. Once it is established that this is an ancient Japanese tomb, one must admit that the southern part of the Korean peninsula was part of Japan in the 4th to 6th centuries. Such a thing is absolutely disgusting for South Koreans. A professor of history at Seoul National University said, "We need to carefully determine whether the people buried in the Janggubong Ancient Tomb are Koreans or Japanese." If you stop the excavation in the middle, you can leave room for saying, "That place might be a Korean tomb." In South Korea, people have been taught that "In ancient times, Korea was more advanced in culture and technology than Japan. Koreans cannot be ruled by the Japanese, who were behind in everything!" . Janggubong Ancient Tomb has the power to blow away such Korean teachings. For South Koreans, the inside of an ancient burial mound is truly "something that must not be seen." South Korean government officials and social activists have often said, ``Japan has not reflected on its past. However, South Korea seems to be reluctant to learn true history. The excavation of the Janggubong Ancient Tomb did not involve media from South Korea. For South Korea, it will be troublesome if something bad is found and reported.
When Japan invaded Korea in 1592, Korea was defeated on all fronts. The Ming dynasty of China, which supported Korea at this time, suffered a financial crisis due to this war. I'm sure you don't know this because you only learn convenient history, so I'll tell you something, but this war was the one that used the most silver among the three great conquests in Banreki. Even the other two wars combined did not match the finances used for this war; the other wars used 800,000 and 2.4 million taels of silver, but this war used more than 7.4 million taels of silver. it was done. Approximately 80,000 Japanese soldiers died during the two dispatches to Korea, but half of them died of starvation and only the remaining 40,000 died fighting. In order to kill these 50,000 people, you lost 200,000 soldiers and the Ming Dynasty lost 38,000 people. Where is the victory? If civilian deaths are included, I think the China-South Korea coalition has probably exceeded 1 million deaths. The war was not a big deal for Japan, but the Ming Dynasty and its vassals suffered irreparable damage (lol).The number of troops dispatched to Korea at that time was 150,000, which was 25% of Japan. corresponds to Do you know of any small country that could not defend against this 25% force and asked China for help? (Laughs) And Japan didn't pay any reparations, just made peace with the Ming Dynasty and withdrew. By the way, North Korea has been refused participation by China in the negotiations. Apparently there was a sailor who was considered a hero in Korea who launched a surprise attack on Shimazu during the retreat and was instantly killed. There are more miserable episodes, do you want to hear them? I see that you believe that the Meiji Restoration brought about a complete reversal, and that you are desperately trying to spread the word overseas, which really makes me angry. Did you know that during the heyday of the Edo period, Japan was an economic power greater than England or Spain, and even just before the Meiji Restoration, Japan's GDP was slightly higher than that of the Ottoman Empire? Did you know that even just before the Meiji Restoration, Japan had a GDP per capita that was half that of the United States? Korea has always been a small country, but Japan has always been a large country.