The History of the Romans: Every Year
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- See the entire history and progression of Roman civilization from the city-state Kingdom all the way to the last Byzantine successor state.
Music:
Majestic Hills by Kevin MacLeod
Link: incompetech.fi...
License: creativecommons...
Hero Down by Kevin MacLeod
Link: incompetech.fi...
License: creativecommons...
Teller of the Tales by Kevin MacLeod
Link: incompetech.fi...
License: creativecommons...
Thanks for over 1 million views everyone! :D
EmperorTigerstar Thanks for making the video!
But not subs
Can you ask google to stop showing adds advocating liberal/feminist propoganda?
It makes you channel look bad.
Companies wont want to buy adds on your channel and your videos will get demonatized or age restricted.
Roman Kingdom: The pilot
Roman Republic: The critically acclaimed prequel
Roman empire: The award winning series
Byzantine empire: The tearjerking finale
Ottoman empire: Villain's spin-off series
HRE: The non-canon comic continuation
Russian empire: Good fan-movie
Kingdom of Italy: Teaser for the reboot
Fascist Italy: Studio's last attempt at a cash-grab that failed horribly
HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE : not Holy , not Roman , not Empire .
@@iplyrunescape305 they are still working on the reboot
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Han
1453 hahaha
Republic of Turkey: Villians Spin off reboot
So the ottoman empire is like the joker of the batman series
One emperor ruling all the way from Scotland to Iraq. Pretty amazing
@Jesse Busman It defies belief really. Never ceases to astound me.
@@dreamer2260 Mongols had one emperor rule all the territory from the Okhotsk Sea/Korea all the way to Wallachia. More impressive if you ask me.
@@bn56would Yes that is also unbelievably impressive. However, their longevity, prosperity and stability was not as great as the Roman Empire, and I would contend that the Roman Empire successfully knitted together a far more culturally, religiously and ethnically diverse empire than the Mongols did.
Matthew Ambrose Fair enough.
Then again the Ummayads stretched from northern India to Spain, and Mongols stretched from Korea to Poland.
"Rome wasn't built in a day." Apparently it took 100 years before they became anything more than a city
@বাঙালী গেমার ottoman empire was much stronger than romans ..ottoman started to conquer in a short time and reigned for a longtime with huge lands
@বাঙালী গেমার sadly yes
@@chocolate6315 u do know rome held its empire longer then the entire ottoman existence right? Then also add in the fact that the byzantines were in Decline and were already on their last legs. Conquering them wasn't that impressive and even with all that the Ottomans struggled and almost lost the entire siege.
@@emreinan7749 the Roman state lasted from 753 BC. to 1453, for a total of 2,206 years.
@@emreinan7749 So I misunderstood me no problem d:
Nobody:
Mussolini’s every night dream:
This is what Mussolini touched himself at night to.
Mussolini was very good
crashverde 1 not at all
@@lemisanthrope8153 you're just weird then
Yyyy U gay It aint easy taking over Nations to Form something especially with a weak millitary back when Mussolini was in charge
I think it is simply amazing that the Roman Empire managed to last 2203 years.
But it broke up into two
+Kaiser Amadeus
Uhm, no it didn't.
marvelfannumber1 You never heard of the Byzantine Empire?
4:48
Kaiser Amadeus
The terms Western Roman Empire and Byzantine Empire are historiographical terms. The empire never "broke in two", in fact there weren't even 2 empires. It was one empire with 2 courts. It was always the same Roman Empire until 1453 (although some could argue it ended in 1204).
Modern historians use these terms to differentiate between the two courts, but nobody living at the time was under the illusion that there were two empires.
The fact that even professional historians get this wrong frustrates me greatly.
The Medieval Ages began with the fall of Rome
And they ended with the fall of Rome
A great classical age finally ending with its fall
And yet a new one beginning in its wake
With their dying breath, the Romans planted the seed that would become the Renaissance
Creating the modern world of today
Say thanks to italy before force us to austerity europeans laws...
@@cameratab.m.5894 Italy is a Germanic-descendent Country that has nothing to do with the Romans. They just saw that the Franks latinazed and then they did the same.
Nice you didnt used German in a sentence
I like how Rome started (according to legend) as Aeneas trying to find a place to build a new Troy that would one day defeat the Greeks, only for his new Troy to finally fall right next to where the original was a few millennia later, it came full circle almost as though it was fate. Which was interestingly a heavy theme in the story of Aeneas.
so I wasn’t the only one with that thought. Yeah, Constantinople is only like a couple days walk away from Troy, funny, 2 days away yet simultaneously over 2000 years apart.
Well thats a legend not reality
There is some archeological and linguistic evidence to point to it being based in reality, atleast to a certain extent.
@@mattarellopazzosgravato9041 There's a few excavation sites that can be traced back around that time. Same with Romulus's Foundation of Rome. It may mostly be fictional stories, but something definitely happened
@@iDeathMaximuMII yeah but most likely not a greek
When your empire lasted so long even counted in 3 years per second the vid still lasts 10 minutes
Fifth Carrier Division Zuikaku-chan SPQR
A 10 minute video. Coincidence ? I don’t think so.
Not even counting the first 200 years
that's the way I watch all of tigerstar's vids in 25% speed
@@narayasuiryoku1397 Coincidence? Definitely! This is from 2016.
I always thought that Byzantium just kind of struggled until fading into history not long after real Rome fell. It was honestly amazing to see that they not only stuck around for a long time, not only that they kept at least a respectable amount of land for the majority of their existence, but also re-conquered the majority of the Mediterranean Sea all over again
Honestly, I may respect Byzantium more than the Roman Empire. Rome conquered, but Byzantium fought against a changing and advancing world
Their quest to reconquer the whole Mediterranean was, in hindsight, a terrible idea that ultimately doomed Byzantines for the long-term decline and eventual fall.
They’re the same Empire
@@iDeathMaximuMII They are, but we view them as different nowadays. Besides, one trended to grab for new territory (and host a new revolt), whereas the other had more of territory stagnation and attempts to reclaim lost legacy
Byzantium had that big resurgence under Justinian, and then several smaller bursts of power where they still managed to take over most of the eastern med.
East rome was always able to push back, heck even the ottomans had a hard time taking constantinople in 1453
*_How did the Roman Kingdom end?_* When Brutus killed the person in charge
*_How did the Roman Republic end?_* When Brutus killed the person in charge
*_How did the Roman Empire end?_* When Turkish Huns kept invading
*_How did the eastern Roman Empire end?_* When Turkish Ottomans kept invading
*_Who was the first ruler of Rome?_* Romulus
*_Who was the first emperor of Rome?_* Augustus
*_Who was the last emperor/ruler of Rome?_* Romulus Augustus
*_Who founded the eastern capital?_* Constantine
*_Who lost the eastern capital?_* Constantine
*_What was the eastern capital?_* Constantinople
*_When did ancient times end?_* When the Roman Empire fell
*_When did medieval times end?_* When the Roman Empire fell
*_When was Rome founded?_* April of 753 BCE
*_When did Rome lose the city of Rome for the second time?_* 753 CE
*_When did Rome finally end?_* April of 1453 CE
(Assuming the Byzantine Empire was the direct descendant of the Roman Empire, which it was)
Its a funny thing Augustus founded the Roman Empire and Romulus Augustus was the last emperor of Rome.
Same thing for the East,We can considerate Constantinus the Great the First emperor of the east because he translate the Capital to Byzantium.And in 1453 in the end of Roman Empire the last emperor was Constantinus XI .
The Byzantine Empire ended on my Birthday
Polandball Historian No one ever mentions poor Trebizond.
Turks doesn't invade, Turks conquer.
no it wasnt
Weird that London and Baghdad were briefly part of the same country.
Well, if Manchuria and Belgrad(insert eastern european city / country) were part of the same empire ...
Or - Berlin and some whatever's on the very east of Russia were part of the same empire
And London and Melbourne and Hong Kong, Cape Town, Vancouver
Baghdad didn't exist back then
I didn’t know. Founded in 765.
Imagine being a part of a political entity that spanned a majority of written human history. Absolutely legendary.
Byzantine Empire in 1204: *exists*
Crusaders: It's free real estate
What do you do after losing Jerusalem
A: reconquer it
B: give up
C: do something stupid like idk destroy Byzantium and let the Muslims to Europe
@@plotniski2822 short term it was good for the crusaders that got rich from sacking it. Long term the Christian world would suffer thanks to it
Ironic, instead of figthing the muslims they ended up debilitating each othen and nearly destroying western culture
@Denis Diderot and they said muslims were evil in that time Vl
@@erwinrommel6561 Without the Seljuk Turks (Muslims attacking Christian territory) there wouldn't be crusades in the first place, so yeah. Dunno why the modern narrative is what it is on this, it's strange and wrong.
Mediterranean: How much territory would you like?
Rome: *Y E S*
@Napoléon Bonaparte ROMA
INVICTA
All of it
Slaves of our own sea... NEVER
fak
Roma caput mundis
Yes the video is pretty long, isn't it? Next week will have two videos. Both of which are directly related.
You never fail to interest, did you know that?
Oh! Great Video
Happy New Year! From Sibiria with love!
+EmperorTigerstar Where do you get the data for all of these??
MOAR
The detail on this is incredible, very well done!
+Ollie Bye (History) Hi, Ollie!
Hornchief Hi!
Ollie say hi to me i love u
OwnageCubed Hi there!
Subscribed.
There isn't a single video on RUclips relating to the Byzantine empire which doesn't have a load of Greeks and Turks going absolutely apeshit at each other in the comments.
Conor: It's not just videos about the Byzantine empire. It includes just about any video in which one of the two nations is mentioned.
Conor: Tigerstar just posted a brand new video about the unifications of Germany and Italy. Guess what one of the first comment threads was about.
Their endless feuding even extends to history that has absolutely nothing to do with them.
This is human nature. People love to take side and have feud. There are also China-Japan, US-Russia, India-Pakistan, Israel-Palestine, ....
Kevin M nah
No empire in history would be as graceful, glorious, and significant as the Roman empire. You just can't compare it to any other empire in its time especially with its lasting significance all over the world.
Ottoman sultan> roma and greek history
@@dancing46 boring.
@@dancing46ottomans are not interesting
Give credit to ancient egypt and mesopotamia, they invented many things that roman civilization would use
@@dancing46 Greek and roman history are much more vast and interesting than ottoman history. And that's just facts, the roman empire lasted for 2 millennials while the ottoman lasted for at least 8 centuries. Don't get me wrong i love turkish culture but when compared to italians/greeks it is just inferior
Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened 😌
africastan
Why should i smile
-Adolf H
rome was suck lets be honest
yeah i smile because3its over, Greece had merit, Rome was destined to fall
Imagine if we sat Caesar down and had him watch this
You mean Julius Caesar, correct?
@@unadin4583 No I mean Gaius Julius Caesar.
@@50shekels I think he would be pleased.
Rather see Augustus reaction.
@@zeroplague His reaction after Teutoburg massacre x10
I'm not crying, it's just that sometimes when i get sad, water comes out of my eyes!
oversimplified
Are you dumb
@@jasontodd5356 no you’re dumb
This enraged his father, who punished him severely
@@jasontodd5356 bringing up off topic things is not proof of a person being dumb, though randomly calling someone dumb because of a reference is dumb
03:25 Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened.
@Русский Парень At it's Height
Don’t smile because it’s over, cry because it happened
Rom A because perpetually lingering on and whining about the past and it’s mistakes is a great way to live a productive and fun life!
The last part is hard to watch.
It's always sad when empires die.
True
What makes it worse is that whereas most empires collapse quickly, the ERE gets gradually conquered over a millennia. It's watching them struggle to hang on but eventually being overcome little by little that makes it so depressing.
etleyn lvz un n englsh
Thats what happens bro. Empires borns, grows, weakens and in the end dies. You cant stop it
Not HRE
Damn 116 AD was the time to be alive in Rome. The best year geographically wide and probably resource wise as well
I disagree, 145 B.C is the Year for me. The dangers of Carthage defeated, the learning of Greece incorporated. Most importantly, the Senate at its closest to the Roman people. My allegiance is to the Republic, to democracy!
@@henrygustavekrausse7459 I also love the Republic but it was closer to being an Oligarchy rather than a Democracy.
@@PyxleanIt was an oligarchy but as far as the ancient period is concerned I gotta take what I can get.
@@henrygustavekrausse7459 Truly, the only country in Ancient times which was more Democratic than the Roman Republic was Athens
1:59 Back when Italy could actually invade Greece
Ouch
I dont k ow what happened
*Romans
@@AlexS-oj8qf The roman army had latin legeionaries of which were an italic tribe so he isn't wrong m8
Hehehe i am greek but still no problem the ancient greeks were jerks and killed each others so Romans deserved to destroy them
Watching the final centuries of the Byzantine empire was pretty sad. It looked like they really struggled to keep holding their empire for years.
Edit 4 years later: Wow I can't believe I got 2.3k likes here, looks like a new record for me, thanks everyone
What do you mean "the Muslims never really made a lot of progress until the fourth crusade"? They had already conquered Egypt, Syria, Judea, North Africa, Sicily, and most of Anatolia by the fourth Crusade.
Along with the Muslim invasions and the Crusades, we also have to take into account the Byzantine Emperors. Because, quite frankly, many were fucking incompetent. It is rather unfortunate that at many crucial moments in the Empire's history, they occurred during the reign of incapable emperors. For example, if the Emperor in 1071 had been more skilled as a general, the Seljuk victory at Manzikert may have been avoided (and the subsequent loss of Anatolia).
Andrew Rendon Although Romanos IV was not a very good general it should be noted that half of his army left right before the battle. However I do agree with you. Especially during the 1180s-1204 area because the emperors at that time were too distracted by politics to stand against the crusaders.
Exactly ... how sad..
He exhausted the Byzantine military and financial capabilities which weakened their ability to fight against Persians. He reconquered most of the former territories but left a fragile and weak Empire to his successors.
6:35 nice bell sound effect when the Byzantine Empire loses the City of Rome for the last time.
Top ten saddest anime deaths
1.
STORM LORD Japan has a better education system then most of Europe and also has the 3rd largest economy.
STORM LORD Well i apologize for not understanding your sarcasm.
@@btdpro752 What has education and economy to do with anime ?
@@michalblasko8740 Anime is communist propaganda
The First Roman King was Romulus, The First Emperor was Augustus, the Last Roman Emperor of the West was Romulus Augustulus.
Brutus Started the Rupublic Brutus Ended the Republic.
Constantine founded Constantinople, the last Roman Emperor of the East was Constantine.
The Franks started the Holy Roman Empire and Francis was it’s last Emperor!
@@larryschultz3139 poetic indeed, but were they really Roman? 🤔🤔🤔
@@Winzton4Lif3 I believe so. The argument for being a legitimate heir is compelling.
@@larryschultz3139 ruclips.net/video/uo1X80xHVSk/видео.html
3:25 Mussolini's wet dream
lol, that got me too bad he couldn't actually realize it.
1year!LOL
Имя Фамилия it's not one year it lasted for ages this is just the peak
1:40 the reality
Steven Cornelio lol
May this glorious Empire rest in peace
It's painful to watch everything wither away because of EU4/CK2 flashbacks.
France what are you doing here? No France NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
+TheExplainerofallthethings. I was playing as Brunswick yesterday and France allied with the Ottomans. I'm all WTF?
+Hornchief They historically also did it, though... Starting at the time of king Francis I and emperor Charles V.
France always declares war on me in Victoria 2.
Fucking France and Frankish Empire before it.
Romans leave Britain.
Picts : “ thank god the Romans left. None of us has to die.”
Vikings : hold my beer
They faced Anglo Saxons before Vikings.
Son Firavun Too bad for the Picts. RIP. Picts
@@a_l7515 it was the Scots who did for the Picts. (At least according to the Scots own histories - I think there is some doubt about the accuracy of that now).
*mead
Picts-saxons-vikings
5:38 Fascinating how close they got to re-establishing the full East/West Empire. One of the great what ifs of history.
Could have done it if the plague hadn't happened and if the Franks hadn't been so powerful
Wyattrox 03 the Hre and Ere almost united at some point. It all gone because a wrong marriage.
@@wyattrox03 Interesting thing is "the Franks" had been under roman rule for over 500 years, why did they resist so much? wouldn't they see themselves as romans?
@@gungner6166 well with all large empires governing over multiple cultures it Dosent seem to work out. One of the reasons the East lived longer is a big thanks to Alexander already making “Hellenic” rule more familiar Just look at Europe today so many diffrent countries. Makes you wonder how long the u.s has left.
@@likeaboss1059 Yeah, really interesting. While you brought up the US, look at the civil war. After 80 years of existence there was already an southern identity
There are several Roman forts where I live in north east England, it’s amazing to know and see just how far they had reached with their empire!
3:25 The Roman Empire on seven seas...
Its just the best empire ever existed
10:10
Despotate of Epirus: all my friends are death
F
So sad..
F
@@historysquad Don't cry because is over, smile because it happened *hugs you and cries*
1479, the fall
Messenger: Your holiness, the Ottomans have captured Constantinople!
Pope: That's terrible news!
Messenger: What should we do?
Pope: I know exactly what we should do!
*adds Byzantine flag filter to facebook profile*
#PRAYFORCONSTANTINOPLE #NOTALLMUSLIMS
+Sarim Hassan I thought it was a good joke with a topical twist and yes empires do eventually come to an end.
Ted Blue Nah, you shut up.
Ted Blue Showing us the ways of the "religion of peace" I see. The fact you're more interested in world conquest than spiritual salvation shows us what's wrong with Islam.
Manny Akintunde Don't judge a whole religion by what is said by one individual. you could say anything and slap to it "in the name of allah"... you should know better. :)
Amr AlKurdi The problem is many Muslim think like Ted Blue and we see this reflected in how Muslims treat religious and ethnic minorities.
R.I.P Byzantine Empire/ Eastern Roman Empire
476-1453
+marioandsonicfan98 330-1453*
+Firefox Lani oh.
+marioandsonicfan98
27 BC-1453 AD*
I thought it started back then.
+marvelfannumber1 We will return... 2021
The amount of coastline impresses me the most. Truly the hardest thing to defend over that much time. The strongest empire ever.
Why coastline is hardest to defend ??
@@netaji-thebritishslayer esp along the Mediterranean, many invaders are going to come over on boats, so the invading country's most crucial objective is to conquer strongholds along the coast so they can then set-up camp and march infantry to the next strategic point. the invaders could be constantly attacking a coast line and attacking it aggressively due to its relative strategic importance making it an exhausting venture for the defending country/empire/state.
Once Rome became big enough, aside from the Persians in the east and the Germanics and Huns, they didn't have any credible threats at all, civil wars were really the main concern. The Atlantic coast didn't need to be defended.
1453: One city challenge activated
AI underestimate my power
lol strong enough to conquer an already dead nation. well done.
Wooden Table where there is truth in that almost all of the cards were stacked in the Ottomans favor and even then they struggled in taking Constantinople
+Wooden Table Seljuks(a turkish khanete) conquered all anatolia exept Istanbul and the seljucks couldn't hold back against mogol invadings and they've divided lots of "beylik" (like karamanogullari,aydinogullari etc.) then osmanogullari (ottoman empire's name before becoming a empire) fought with that beyliks and byzantium at the 29 May 1453 II.Mehmed conquered Konstantinopolis after taking the city name it ''Kontantiniyye'' got it you fucking old headed crusade?
Turks and their fantasys of history. It doesn't matter where the Osman beylik appeared from but it's largest advantage was the pretty much already dead Byzantines. As a state it was far more stable than the romans at the time and doing what turks did weakened them further by constantly raiding their territories. Byzantium died due to the fact that the latins were constantly seeking to take territory from them and the ottomans kept chipping away till they were nothing. Taking Constantinople was no great victory. The ottomans brought around 80 thousand soldiers and the byzantines by this point barely had a standing army.
Also the reason why the Osman beylik was able to overcome the surrounding Beyliks is due to the byzantine territory they were able to eat up with ease.
Keep in mind the Seljuks after Manzikert eventually lost the majority of their lands in anatolia only being within the platue of it due to the Komnenos Dynasty. If not for the Angeloi who destroy the empire through mis-management, the turks would've never overcame the Byzantines. The Sultanate of rum could've been fully eliminated if Manuel Komnenos didn't focus on europe and focused more on anatolia while the Sultanate of Rum was having major internal conflicts.
The empire with the most comebacks
@@chocolate6315 not really ottomans lasted 600 years and the romans lasted
over 2000 years
@@Kinsley40 I thought the Ottomans lasted 800 years? (not debating over which one is better)
@@Kinsley40 when you realize that turkey just changed from a monarchy to a republic and even lives today! 🤯
And compare the growth...
Rome was "born" in 753 bc...it was till 390 bc a...city...and after 1300 ac...again...a city.
Ottomans after 400 (1299-1683) years reached their highest expansion
@@emreinan7749 are you kidding???? You are really comarjng Roman And Persian Empires With Joking Ottoman Empire 😐😐🤣🤣🤣🤣
That is Persian Empire 🇮🇷👑
I love how Byzantine Empire tried to recreate Rome, and almost did it in 5:37, many tried to reform the Roman Empire, but Byzantium was the closest to do it.
Byzantium was the Roman Empire. It just wanted to take the city of Rome back....
The crusades and the plague totally destroyed it otherwise it could have survived.
Dude. Byzantine empire didn’t exist. It’s just a historical term that’s used for it’s eastern half after the western half collapsed. If you asked any “Byzantine” citizen they would say they’re Romans. It WAS the Roman empire
The Illyrians 🇦🇱 contributed a lot to the Roman/Byzantine Empire 🦅 (Fearsome Warriors).
Here is the list of Roman Emperors 🤴 of Illyrian origin (🇦🇱):
- Justinian I
- Justin I
- Anastasius I
- Marcianus
- Valentinian II
- Gratian
- Valens
- Valentinian I
- Jovian
- Constantius II
- Constantine the Great
- Maximianus "Herculius
- Diocletian
- Probus
- Aurelian
- Quintillus
- Claudius II "Gothicus
- Hostilianus
- Decius
Source: The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third by Edward N. Luttwak, page 178, "high-grade cavalry (equites Illyriciani)"
This region was late Romanized. It was famous for its excellent soldiers, frustrated but courageous. In Illyria (in the geographical sense) was indeed the most powerful of the Roman armies, in charge of watching over the Danube (nearly 12 legions, that is to say 130 000 men) .
@@Universal.. who
Should've included the Holy Roman Empire just for the laughs
If Greeks can be Romans Germans and Turks can be too.
Byzantium is already a joke.
Pathetic byzantium did nothing but just struggle to take back italy and call themselves romans while living in greeece.
The fanboys choosed the lamest kingdom of the time to be gay over it.
@@hamidmalmo7664 ok I'm sorry
@@hamidmalmo7664 The Byzantine Empire was the Roman Empire whether you like it or not. They split in half and West fell before East. The Holy Roman Empire on the other hand actually had nothing to do with the original Roman Empire whereas the Byzantines were a direct splinter off of it. Now you tell me who were the "fanboys" and who were the real deal.
@@BaconMaken Oh.... now I get it.
And they never called themselves the byzentaine empire nor were they adressed by that.
So... Its a fact that the last roman settelement was taken by some highly militaristic people of anatolia. :((((((((
Don't cry because it's over, be happy because it happened.
Byzantine Ball: The fall of Rome was a necessary event in the creation of the modern world.
Girl: I can’t believe you didn’t cry on Titanic. Do you have any emotions ? Have you ever cried ?
Boys:
Not me
@@chocolate6315 Ok ottopoop
@@jimboonie9885 stay mad cuz they ruled your country for 500 years 😘😘😘
@@chocolate6315 They ruled yours for a 1000
@@cmdrgarbage1895 Turks wasn't even in anatolia at the time period that the Roman Empire existed. So,your argument is invalid. Note: I'm not talking about the Byzantine period,so your argument is still invalid.
Rome started with Romulus and ended with Romulus, first was a king, last was an emperor. Eastern Rome started with Constantine and ended with Constantine. The greatest civilisation of humanity.
Rome was a barbaric and cruel society. That's why we eliminated it and brought justice and prosperity to Anatolia and the Balkans.
@@Bilinmeyenbiri1236yxzuwjvwjci Ottomans bought no technological advancement in europe except pilliging and barbarian ideas tell me useful things ottomans bought to europe and not their dirty religion and pilliging cities
@@Bilinmeyenbiri1236yxzuwjvwjciracist
I have a question.
Romanian language comes from latin right? But the territory of modern romania was never held for to much time as other places that dont speak today languages that come from latin.
How did it happened
Romanian is from Latin but is an Eastern Romance language, meaning it developed differently, hence why it's still related yet sounding different than Spanish or Italian. The Roman settlements were abandoned but many remained or the people remained, hence the lingering of the language.
***** Thanks
+EmperorTigerstar Mihai Vinereanu prove that romanian language have 12% words from latin, and 70% geto-dacians words. Also a genetical study made by universities from UK , prove that people from our country have from 65% (in Bucharest and other big cities where people are mix with other nationalities) to 90% in mountains villages). Roman Emperor like Galerius and Regalianus were dacians and Justinian I was thracians. Dacians have over 244 statues made by romans like Arch of Constantine .micilevacante.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/roma2011333.jpg In Estonia or Latvia are villages who are named Moldova, Pădurea, in Poland , Czekh Republic and Slovakia live 1.5 milion romanians .
+noledareminombreaunamaquina Romania has been surrounded by Slavic-speaking peoples for centuries, so it evolved differently than the western romance languages.
+noledareminombreaunamaquina Well, the thing with the Roman Empire is that what you see in this video is what they controlled from a military point of view, so where they had castrums. But the Roman influence spanned a lot farther. In Romania's case they didn't have a province in the Southern part because, well, it was a huge forest, it was difficult to control, with no payback, unlike in the North where there were a lot of resources .... BUT they did built roads, defensive walled positions just in case, so the area was fully within their control. So when the Thracian population in Transylvania Latinized so did the tribes that were still free, in the East and South... and because there was a National unity feeling among the Thracian (Dacian) tribes the process continued even after the Roman legions left.
One more thing contributed to it, unlike other Roman provinces on the border, Dacia (the Dacian provinces, there were always at least 3) wasn't abandoned in an orderly fashion. In most cases the army, the bureaucracy, some of the population had the time to move to safer areas within the Empire. By 250 the Goths had reached the Black Sea and started raiding the Eastern provinces, in 268 there was a huge invasion and Dacia was simply lost, the entire population trapped north of the Danube, unable to move for years. 5 years later Aurelian restored the situation within the empire, but never attempted to recover Dacia (he also died very fast).
But in the end, it is kind of a mystery, how could a province that was held for only 150 years by the Roman Empire remain Latin, when so many others didn't (like Britain). Not to mention that all the migrations for the next 1000 years (ending with the Mongol invasion) came through (and pillaged) Romania. Probably the answer is the mountains, the Roman speaking population retreated to defensible areas, in the Carpathian mountains and survived. Because of all those migrations very few written documents remain from that period. (Hope this answers it, try to ignore the idiots that have answered before, they preach an alternative history and lies).
3:24 greatest extent, 117 AD, Rome
5:36 greatest extent 556 AD, Byzantium
Year 556
@@flores332 Do you mean geographically? It doesn't look that way to me.
@@unadin4583 for the byzantines
5:37
Roman empire is when kids cry
Byzatine empire is when Teens cry
Despotate of epirus is when Adults cry
Mongols: Lasted for 100 years as a united empire, quickly collapsed as soon as crises came to it.
Macedon: Collapsed into civil war immediately after Alexander's death; effectively lasted for 13 years.
French Empire: died after Napoleon's head got too big and invaded Russia.
Roman Empire: lasted for much longer than a 1000 years, persevered after many crises (e.g. 3rd century). Only through treachery and betrayal was it destroyed.
No other empire started steadily declining since the 3rd century and still live to see the 15th
Actually Frances empire never died
@@wilcowen6284 I'm talking Napoleon's Empire. It definitely collapsed. The Bonapartes no longer rule, the regime has changed, and it no longer has much power in Europe outside of its own borders.
@@apparentlyjeremy True... sort of. The Roman Empire never was in constant decline. It bounced back many times.
1. The revival under Constantine
2. Justinian's conquests
3. The Macedonian renaissance
4. The Komnenid restoration
5. The early Palailogan restoration
5:14 : When the Western Roman Empire is a piece of France ....
It's crazy to think that syagrius could have overcome the franks and basically become roman gaul if they played their cards right, and replaced france in history. That would have been interesting.
Greeks and Turkey turks comes from the descendants of the Romans.
Orthodox Romans = Greece
Muslim Roma=Turk 😂😂
The French destroy our empire
If Syagrius defeated Clovis at Soissons France would have never existed and Western Roman Empire might have survived in Gaul.
Let’s all just be glad history went the way it did.
So I know now who's in Paris...
The year is 50 BC. Gaul is entirely occupied by the Romans. Well, not entirely... One small village of indomitable Gauls still holds out against the invaders. And life is not easy for the Roman legionaries who garrrison the fortified camps of Totorum, Aquarium, Laudanum and Compendium.....
You can thank Julius ceaser for that
Julius Caesar is asking himself
“Q V I D?”
Astrix??
Cantabrians and Asturians are the original Asterix and Obelix
F8 me
Ahhh good times!
Seeing the western roman empire fall was sad, but at least it was a quik and painless death. Seeing the byzantine empire struggle for its life was truly heartbreaking. F
;)
@@fatihsultanmehmetc6481 uh
The Illyrians 🇦🇱 contributed a lot to the Roman/Byzantine Empire 🦅 (Fearsome Warriors).
Here is the list of Roman Emperors 🤴 of Illyrian origin (🇦🇱):
- Justinian I
- Justin I
- Anastasius I
- Marcianus
- Valentinian II
- Gratian
- Valens
- Valentinian I
- Jovian
- Constantius II
- Constantine the Great
- Maximianus "Herculius
- Diocletian
- Probus
- Aurelian
- Quintillus
- Claudius II "Gothicus
- Hostilianus
- Decius
Source: The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third by Edward N. Luttwak, page 178, "high-grade cavalry (equites Illyriciani)"
This region was late Romanized. It was famous for its excellent soldiers, frustrated but courageous. In Illyria (in the geographical sense) was indeed the most powerful of the Roman armies, in charge of watching over the Danube (nearly 12 legions, that is to say 130 000 men) .
The Byzantine Empire was the Greek Roman empire
@@Universal..Albanians aren’t descended from Illyrian’s you clown. You’re nothing more than half Turkic scum who sold their daughters to the ottomans.
Why is the roman empire so interesting? I love everything about the romans.
Probably because they were the first empire that had a government/language/culture that is recognizable to huge chunks of the world today. It still influences like 50% of the world today, even places it never conquered. Also because it lasted so long. Over 2,000 years, kinda. And finally I think it's because there's no way Rome should've been able to get as big and powerful as it did and last as long as it did. Think about it - Rome was a small city on a hill. It wasn't good farm land, it didn't have any gold or silver mines, it didn't have a large population. All it had was fish from the river Tiber. To its north, the Etruscans were far more civilized and advanced. To its south, the Greeks were far more civilized and advanced. Rome was conquered first by the Etruscans, but they came back. Then they were conquered by the Gauls under King Brennus, but they came back. Somehow they just kept winning.
I think Roman empire was like the first European Empire that introduced many things to Europe in that time
@@Aethelhald Do you think they were refugees from an actual Trojan war?
@@Checkmate54321 Some refugees from Troy may have escaped to Rome and settled there but I believe archaeological evidence shows it was inhabited much earlier than the Trojan War.
Everything? I mean, come on man. There were a lot of really effed up things about the Romans.
A remark - 8:38 during reign of Manuel I Komenos (1143-1180) Eastern-Roman Empire actually streched Serbia, Bosnia and Croatia in the West and have suzerenity over Cicilia and all south coast of Anatolia. #ByzantineEmpire 🇬🇷
Lasted for 2000 years, ended because door wasn't closed properly.
Thats a bullshit story though.
Lewin Tao Sadly it probably wouldn’t have lasted much longer if that hadn’t happened.
@@mk-mz8ng says Hitler
Excuse my arrogance but I have never heard of this before; so what is this "door wasn't closed properly" thing? I feel like it is a woosh comment but history can do essentially anything so... yeah
Rico134 the reason the ottomans were able to take Constantinople was because a gate was left open after the byzantines finished fighting outside the walls due to some idiotz
2:52 "Varus, Varus! Give me back my Legions!"
a reference
To the Battle of Teutenburg Forest, where Arminius destroyed Roman Legions, and prevented further Roman expedition into Germania
I, Claudius, eh?
"Oh Varus, Quintilus Varus! Give me back my Legions!" - Total War: Rome II. Emperor Augustus yelling that while standing in a forest with 20,000 dead Roman soldiers who fought to their death when ambushed against hundreds of thousands of barbaric hordes.
Michael Klopper arminius was a roman general that betrayed his legions while they were peacefully marching to the jutland peninsula.Varus never leaded a legion before and after that event augustus sent germanicus that killed all the germans involved in that battle and their village. So i think it was more a mutilated victory than a victory
Her: babe, what's wrong?
Me, closing the video: I don't want to talk about it
In the minute 2:59 Jesus Christ died
It would be so cool to go back and see the Roman Empire in all its glory. Like around 220 AD.
Guess we'll wait for a time machine to be made and then maybe we will
Now that would be a really stupid idea no offense
@@daiIyclipz Yeah,probably,but you know,it would be just for research purposes,nothing more
You'd probably want to go back to around 100 AD to see the Roman Empire in all its glory. That's around the time they were at their absolute height of power, militarily and economically. It was also right in the middle of the most prosperous and peaceful period of Europe (and the other parts of the empire) before or since. Europe wouldn't experience peace and prosperity like that again until recent times, like after World War 2.
If you go back to 220 AD you're gonna see a Roman Empire that has seriously stagnated and fallen to massive corruption, endless civil war and invasion from literally every state on its borders. Oh and total economic collapse, to the point where citizens have gone back to bartering because the money is useless.
@Arpad Jones You could also go to the time of Diocletian or Constantine the Great. Both of those were also golden eras of the Roman Empire, where their power and society was unrivalled.
The ultimate period of Rome's greatness though was probably Augustus. They truly were unchallenged and totally peaceful.
95% of people are unable to get through this video!
Don't cry at the end!
I cried
I cried
I cried
Roman? let's go bowling!
Sorry cousin not now, maybe another time.
이준용 ahhh that one hurts
You think i'm fooling around? Don't get up!
_roman! I should never have read your fakin emails and stayed away!_
This comment made my day.
4:16 *LET'S SPLIT UP GANG!*
8:51
Its the tetrarchy. 4 emperors 1 empire
10:05 *the top ten saddest anime endings*
Roman empire is when kids cry
Byzatine empire is when Teens cry
Despotate of epirus is when Adults cry
@Büyük Küçük Thx
I’m glad someone is still using AD
I just love how the Desposate keeps coming back.
Good Stuff Dude.
GG
Feels bad man.
But also feels good for what was.
Hello fellow dictatoe
@@tsarnature6587 no, go back to the gulag stalin
If Remus was in charge of Rome, Rome would have been called Reme.
3:22 those are legendary borders
The real Rome
@@onur8632 Fake Rome
5:36 we got them back bois.We got the city,langauge and leagacy
@Lucius Vernus Sadly, it didn’t last.
7:41 Emperor Basil II was a grade A badass
One of the best emperor ever
One of the cruelest people too
@@soulplexis Vlad the impaler: hold my stake
There’s a reason why he holds the greatest epithet ever conceived: Boulgaroktonos, Bulgar Slayer
@@soulplexis kaloyan the romanslayer massacred a bunch of cities because why not, he was so cruel there are myths that a divine spirit struck him sown
2,232 years of roman civilization. The Byzantines fell 1,003 years after the western roman empire "fell." And 500 years later we still feel the influence the romans left in most of western civilization. One of the greatest to have ever graced out planets. Truly amazing.
One of the most barbarious empires too😂
@@netaji-thebritishslayer what do you expect from people who lived before the calendar was invented
*Roman Civilisation*:exists
*Turks and Germans*:Let us introduce ourselves.
The ottoman emoire is not comparable with the Glory of Rome
Laughs in 1453, Hun raids and Germanic raids
@@haha-kf2xb The Roman culture is atthe base of the all the word, you can't paragonable this with the ottoman empire
Arab: am I joke to you ??
without the arabic/ottoman sultanetes, there wouldn't be modern science.
5:50 - And then Arabs happened.
PS It was very sad to see years ticking up to 1453...
????
That brings me to 602. The Arabs were a generation later.
That means the Sassanid Persians, not the Arabs. People forget that the Sassanids under Khosrau I invaded Byzantine territory in 610, and occupied large parts of it till 627.
The Arabs don't start conquering till 634.
Кэтишкэт i know right so sad same as watching the wast crumble the closest comparison to how sad I am watching this is in the Elder Scroll series the whole life of the Dwemer/dwarves to see the greatest civilization rise and have so much influence in the world and all the progress that has been generated over Millenia to see crumble so fast is fantastic
The Persians fought a very long and exhausting war against the Byzantines, and that is why the Arabs found it so easy to conquer all of Persia and over 60%of the Byzantine Empire.
adi yaf both empires were in decline and the the caliphs were good military leqders as well as muhammad
Islam not arabs
wow that was awesome, Rome is my favorite empire by far out of all of them to study and learn. They are also by far the one have the most respect for outside of my country
love you too (No Homo)
THE GREATEST EMPIRE OF ALL TIME
Screw the "Empire", hail to the REPUBLIC!
King Romulus would be crying, jumping joyfully, almost having a heart attack, and mad if he watched this video.
Loooong time ago a young boy called Rome, a great european warrior, met lady Athens, a great culture woman. They fell in love and married. after 550 years of marriage, Rome were killed by Germany, and Athens tried to survive alone, with her sons, but after long time she also died by the hand of evil Ottomans. Her sons avenged their parents killing Ottomans, then the oldest of them Spain, and Portugal, built a huge empire, while France and Italy spreaded culture and good food and Romania, the youngest one tried to survive. Today these five brothers are still here....
Aaand Romania is...Greece I guess?
+WSUH Gaming It was supposed to be ironic, not racist (I really like Turkey).
They speak a germanic language in England, nothing roman about it.
+Niel Relatado Most of british cities were built by romans.
+Niel Relatado The English are ethno-linguistically a Germanic people. If anything, England's dad is Schleswig.
+Sweyn78 English belongs solely to the Germanic linguistic family. It may have a majority Italic vocabulary with most words being coinings from the Renaissance, but it is solely classified as a Germanic as the creolization of English is currently disputed or even accredited to Old Norse, another Germanic language. Remember, 97 of the 100 most frequently used words in the English language are Germanic.
ROMA INVICTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Without a doubt emperor Augustus, Marcus Aurelius and Justinian where some of the most cappable and succesfull rules of the empire
What about Trajen and Hadrian(before old age and illness got the best of him). Also Claudius just because he was seen uncapable by all.
Lord Alehandro Constantine was ok, but Theodosius legacy was terrible in the middle and long term
Basil II didn't bankrupt the nation like Justinian, although to be fair, Justinian was fighting a plague.
Manuel was a grear emperor too infact the Ottomans got their balkan borders inspired by him.
@@marstheredplanet2027 He was good, John & Alexios were a lot better.He keeps trying to do this and that, and never really accomplished meaningful permanent gains because he never really invested into it that much.He really reminds me of Justinian, Like how his territories in Dalmatia & balkans fell apart after his death.
10:05 "change da world
my final message,
goodbye"
The Illyrians 🇦🇱 contributed a lot to the Roman/Byzantine Empire 🦅 (Fearsome Warriors).
Here is the list of Roman Emperors 🤴 of Illyrian origin (🇦🇱):
- Justinian I
- Justin I
- Anastasius I
- Marcianus
- Valentinian II
- Gratian
- Valens
- Valentinian I
- Jovian
- Constantius II
- Constantine the Great
- Maximianus "Herculius
- Diocletian
- Probus
- Aurelian
- Quintillus
- Claudius II "Gothicus
- Hostilianus
- Decius
Source: The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third by Edward N. Luttwak, page 178, "high-grade cavalry (equites Illyriciani)"
This region was late Romanized. It was famous for its excellent soldiers, frustrated but courageous. In Illyria (in the geographical sense) was indeed the most powerful of the Roman armies, in charge of watching over the Danube (nearly 12 legions, that is to say 130 000 men) ..
Amazing wörk, as always.
+GalacticPenguinTV It is greät indeed! greät wörk yöü häve döne there, emperör!
güys, stöp mäking fün öf this
userwhosinterestedin
Nö. This is äwesöme.
Cőme őn gűys, that's nőthing.
Cipőfűző.
omer zohar 😂
5:27 Yall see my boys Justninian and Belasarius doing their thing.
based, brother
The Illyrians 🇦🇱 contributed a lot to the Roman/Byzantine Empire 🦅 (Fearsome Warriors).
Here is the list of Roman Emperors 🤴 of Illyrian origin (🇦🇱):
- Justinian I
- Justin I
- Anastasius I
- Marcianus
- Valentinian II
- Gratian
- Valens
- Valentinian I
- Jovian
- Constantius II
- Constantine the Great
- Maximianus "Herculius
- Diocletian
- Probus
- Aurelian
- Quintillus
- Claudius II "Gothicus
- Hostilianus
- Decius
Source: The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third by Edward N. Luttwak, page 178, "high-grade cavalry (equites Illyriciani)"
This region was late Romanized. It was famous for its excellent soldiers, frustrated but courageous. In Illyria (in the geographical sense) was indeed the most powerful of the Roman armies, in charge of watching over the Danube (nearly 12 legions, that is to say 130 000 men) ..
When we think of Rome, we think of it as a long time away from Colonization of the Americas. However, if Rome held on for another 20 years, we technically might have been able to see a Roman colony in America.
Technically yes but feasibley no , you know considering the whole fact they were only a single city at that point
Technically Italy is Rome and Italy had American colonies
@@mellowYellow123-r1q which? As far as i know France, England, Portugal, Spain and Netherlands are the only nations to colonize the Americas, even the Prussians tried to colonize Venezuela, Italians just colonized some parts of Africa like Ethiopia
@@felipepetersberchielli1651 only the Grand Duke Ferdinand I of Tuscany tried to create a colony in South America in the 17th century but failed when he died ... but indirectly there were several unofficial Italian colonies transplanted throughout America(Panama,Venezuela, Uruguay, Brasile, Argentina,ecc...)
@@dareius831 not colonies, communities, it is far different, i am myself an italian descendant but not because the Italians colonized parts of Brazil but because they mass migrated to Brazil(and the Americas in general) in the late XIX century.
It really is amazing how the byzantines survived for a thousand years, and how the romans survived for a thousand more. Most empires would survive only 3 centuries, but the roman empire survived 20 centuries.
It also fits on how the dardanelles gun ended the roman empire. It signalled the end of the ancient/medieval era for Europe and gave rise to the early modernisation period.
Roma father of Spain!
José Andrés *Father of Italy
Cloud PLI father of west*
José Andrés fathers of all peoples from Britain to Iraq and the now civilized world.. 👌
Cloud PLI both dumbass
Father of western culture
Make Italy great again!
Make Byzantium great again!
Illyrian will never forget, and forgotten fucking barbars.
Still Italy is ruling our lands. in Adriatic Sea
South and North
NorthernWest
and South West.
Arbnor Veliiu What?
Mauri Spagnoli Do u know Illyria
Arbnor Veliiu no what is that?
Mauri Spagnoli Illyrian Lands
Albania,Dardania (Kosovo) Epirote, Ilirida,Malesia,Montenegro,Presheva,Bosnia,Croatia,Slovenia.
U stole our lands
In SouthWest Italy and NorthernWest Italy. Ilyrian lands in ancient times.
8:33 its sad to see, a recovery was starting to happen but it all had to go wrong from there
Un saludo desde España a nuestros hermanos italianos 🇪🇸🇮🇹
Saluti da Milano 🇮🇹🇪🇦
Un saluto dall'Italia ai nostri fratelli spagnoli! 🇮🇹🇪🇸
Thank you 🇮🇹🇪🇦
Ciao caro!
Master Junky
Saludos de Hispalis (today Sevilla), city of Hadrian and Trajan (itálica)
Huge respect to roman civilization from turkey.
@@dnm3732 k he didn't mention it so why do u see the need to bring that up
@@dnm3732 ananla aramızda bir şeyler de has just happened
DNM's Interests Translate Please Biz Soykırım Yapsaydık Ermenistan Olmazdı Bunu Bil
@@paramondd4457 why do you think I would know what it mean
@@allanjbucknol4414 forget what I did 2 months ago
I like how the music becomes so intense once the Roman empire finally forms
2:34 Shit starts happening
3:48 That leader sounds like my name
5:37 The Byzantine Empire sort of revived the Roman Empire’s land there
10:05 : Theme of Guts starts playing
Something to consider, is that the eastern roman empire never truly collapsed into a dark age. It was a powerful economy, and you will find many renaissance ideals born in the east, the Italian renaissance for example, was partly sparked by byzantine scholars fleeing the ottoman empire, and great technologies did appear in this shadow of a once glorious Rome...
Exactly.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Chrysoloras
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laonikos_Chalkokondyles
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demetrios_Chalkokondyles
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basilios_Bessarion
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemistus_Pletho
In my first year at university we played a little game: when did Rome fall? We got slightly different results, here they are, from earliest to latest:
312 CE: the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. This is probably a popular one among neo-paganists. Constantine triumphed over Maxentius 'in this sign'. Very debatable if you ask me, but then again, Rome ceased to be the capital of its empire after Constantine took sole power.
324 CE: for similar reasons. Constantine defeated Licinius and accelerated Rome's Christianization and moved the capital.
395 CE: the final divorce between East and West. With the most prosperous provinces now divided from the struggling west, the waiting game started. It would take less than a century before it all came crashing down, but Rome was already at the mercy of its enemies.
410 CE: the first sack of Rome since Brennus and the Gauls invaded 800 years prior. The Goths showed how weak the Empire had become, and any shred of legitimacy was fading away.
455 CE: the second sack of Rome in the space of half a century. The Vandals didn't exactly vandalize (sorry) the city but they proved once more how useless the court at Ravenna was at being an empire.
476 CE: exile of the last Western Roman Emperor, Romulus Augustulus. There would be no emperor in the west until Charlemagne claimed this title.
480 CE: death of Julius Nepos, deposed Western Roman Empire who ruled over a small plot of land in Dalmatia.
565 CE: death of Justinian, 'the last Roman Emperor'. After his death, the reconquered lands west of the Balkans would slowly be lost again.
1071 CE: Battle of Manzikert. The Byzantines were crushed by the Turks and showed no sign of recuperation. Anatolia was lost, and the Empire remained only a shadow of its former self.
1202 CE: Latin Empire founded, loss of Constantinople. The Fourth Crusade kicked the Byzantines out of Byzantium. Need I say more? Probably. But that would make this comment even longer than it already is.
1453 CE: fall of Constantinople. The capital of the once great Empire was finally lost to the Ottomans due to a f*ing huge cannon.
1479 CE: fall of the last remains of Byzantine holdings in Epirus.
1806 CE: 'Holy' 'Roman' 'Empire' abolished. See what I did there?
1917 CE: end of Romanov dynasty, last claimants of Roman rule.
Pick your favorite.
***** If someone doesn't want to read it, that's fine. And I'm sure a lot are but that hardly seems relevant to my comment.
+evklinken wasnt the fall of constantinople because someone leaved the gate opened?
jhfridhem one of the soldiers did on accident. If that hadn't happened they might not have reached the walls at all at that siege
You could say it never ended because of the Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church.
evklinken 17
A greater Empire never existed. Some peoples conquered more land and in less time, but the fact that the Romans could not only conquer but absorb so many different cultures, from England to Syria, is absolutely amazing.
+Hfsm33 What does 'absorb' mean in this context? I hope you're not some multicultural dreamer because they sure as hell weren't holding hands and singing songs around a campfire.
Klifsnider No, but they occupied territories with relative peace and often did not depose rulers. Latin culture adaptation was a slow process I imagine.
+Hfsm33 Modern Greeks have only 79%pure greek dna, the another 21% comes from slavs and armenians. So it proves that during the Byzantine empire, those two nations were absorbed to the Greeks.
+Macedonian Lion To be fair. Armenians are most likely of Greek descent.
Hfsm33 and the Roman's weren't defeated by a bunch of farmers angry about taxes
14 Year old Girls: You've never felt real sadness
Boys: Yes we have
14 Year old girls: How is that?
Boys: 10:05
Nah 1204 was the real sad part
I'm a 13 year old girl and I cried at 10:14
i was sad when the 5:18 arrived
@Minesto * bende bakıyom Türk yokmu
Larem Metay tabiki var eheheehh
I'm so happy I watched this in school today! :)
then, you are lucky
Then, you are lucky
then,you are lucky
Then, you are lucky
Truly, the greatest empire to have ever existed.
To have ruled for so long over the most diverse peoples, cultures, and climates.
10:02, every Europa Universalis 4 player: "Time to get back to business"