NASA Artemis 2 launch pad's water deluge system tested

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 янв 2025

Комментарии • 81

  • @use_1994
    @use_1994 Год назад +7

    Wow,nice,I love 39b still making me nostalgic for shuttle and Saturn era🧑‍🚀🌟

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад +2

      💯🚀💯...so what you're really saying is, "Hey! I know a thing or two about this as I'm a huge fan of all things space and NASA" Well fair enough, tell us more, fellow space geek! 👍🏼🤪🥳🛸🩻🌐🪁☯️

    • @use_1994
      @use_1994 Год назад

      @@r.martin3494 I'm sorry you have internet,if you want to know more🤪

  • @JitendraYadav-mi3qu
    @JitendraYadav-mi3qu Год назад +2

    I am wondering about structural engineering of the whole launch pad structure, how full proof engineering is this! Amazing

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад +1

      It sure ain't made in China 🍜 for public use, that's for "dang" sure!!! 💸🦟🕸️🕷️

  • @r.martin3494
    @r.martin3494 Год назад +3

    There is an entire freshwater recirculating and pumping system just as there are for many applications which I might add "cost an arm, a shoulder and a leg". The reason the water disappears from the lower level is because it is falling into collection grates and heading back to a large relatively thin, quick passage filter and no doubt several industrial pumps similar to the type that sucks up seabed sand through a ship's pump unit and spits it out to another place to create a 'solid' base for the famous Palm residential "phase", out there in "Arab-land", and other such places. Other examples of recirculated freshwater are any public fountains, the famous fountains of the Bellagio Hotel & Casino on the Las Vegas strip for example, etc.
    -
    The most "criminal" waste of freshwater is used in (of all places) a desert environment; the golf courses of L.V., U.S.A. L.V., where catastrophic water shortage is looming and the Hoover dam's Lake Mead is all but finished when it comes to hydro-power production; electricity for the whole vast area. L. V. where until the 11th hour they think it's alright to have wasted so much for the sake of greedy business and living it up like there's no tomorrow! L.V., a place that gobbles-up - is it 3 times as much fresh, potable water than the average city in America (per capita)? 💦🫠 😵🤯😰🤕😠
    "What happens in vegas...
    ...Stays in Vegas", except for precious clean water, most of which is lost, by the look of the white water mark at Lake Mead! 😢

  • @tomwilliam5118
    @tomwilliam5118 Год назад +13

    I wonder if it's saltwater from the ocean but then again that would rust everything that's a lot of freshwater to be dumping out

    • @PplsChampion
      @PplsChampion Год назад

      fresh water [or desalinated seawater not sure], pumped into a pair of water towers nearby. look up SSWS tower for more info

    • @volkswagenb9406
      @volkswagenb9406 Год назад +4

      They use freshwater, like you said saltwater is corrosive. Fresh water is already very cheap as well, salt water from the cape would need its own filtration systems to remove particles.

    • @LokiandBjorn
      @LokiandBjorn Год назад +4

      They have a collection and recirculation system

    • @kevint.9837
      @kevint.9837 Год назад

      Why was this the first thought I had when I saw this

    • @24sjnds
      @24sjnds Год назад

      waste of so much fresh water

  • @zetarojo1291
    @zetarojo1291 Год назад +3

    Espectacular!!!!!!

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад +1

      Yes indeed, it is truly 🫠SPECTACULAR!!! 🥳

  • @lukepartington6049
    @lukepartington6049 9 месяцев назад

    Show the pumps

  • @r.martin3494
    @r.martin3494 Год назад +2

    ​​​@DrPhilMM
    Are you sure that wasn't NASA and Boca Vista! 👨🏼‍🦳👵🏻😴💤 🙊 It's alright, I'm just being a cheeky monkey. NASA's water facets were always called "rainbirds" and these are the best I've seen, these are fr#@king AWESOME!

  • @yoskarokuto3553
    @yoskarokuto3553 Год назад

    cooling down with this ? ( apollo 11 press conference )

  • @stevemcfarland875
    @stevemcfarland875 Год назад

    How many hundreds of thousands of gallons of water are being dumped in that time span

    • @pebmets
      @pebmets Год назад

      450,000 gallons. The system at 39B can run at a rate of 1.1 million gallons per minute.

  • @nejc8a
    @nejc8a Год назад

    Is this scenario in case of fire??

    • @owensmith7530
      @owensmith7530 Год назад +2

      No it's to suppress the noise, shock waves and and heat of the rocket launch so it doesn't destroy itself and the pad.

    • @Andrews19d
      @Andrews19d Год назад +1

      I mean... technically... yeah

    • @dbrenz
      @dbrenz Год назад +1

      ​@@owensmith7530ah right, so does a lot of this water instantly become steam when it comes in contact with the hot rocket exhaust during launch and create the huge white clouds we see?

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад

      ​@@dbrenzSome of it does a lot doesn't but all that white clouds is a mix of smoke and mainly steam. The forces are almost unfathomable, were talking here of a force shockwave and heat hotter than the surface off the sun, that can weaken and eventually destroy some degree of solid concrete! A water deluge system is cheaper than launch pad reconstruction even if steel. cheaper

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад

      ​@@dbrenz
      Or the short answer is; Steam? White clouds? Noises? No! That's after lunch not launch!

  • @roidroid
    @roidroid Год назад +2

    Does your launch-stand sometimes not feel...as FRESH as it should be? 🛀

  • @Zayzay_3252
    @Zayzay_3252 Месяц назад

    when u see a cockroach on the launch pad

  • @ryanjones9881
    @ryanjones9881 Год назад

    Can Orion be refused?

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад +1

      What do you mean, refused by whom?

    • @GeneralGrievousCIS
      @GeneralGrievousCIS Год назад +1

      Do you mean re-used? If so, then yes... the crew capsule is reusable anyway (the service module isn't)

  • @r.martin3494
    @r.martin3494 Год назад +1

    What! Steam? White clouds? Noises?
    No No, dear boy!
    That comes after lunch!
    Not launch!

  • @DrPhilMM
    @DrPhilMM Год назад +3

    This how the deluge system should be built, not like what SpaceX is doing with Starship deluge system!

    • @motokid6008
      @motokid6008 Год назад +2

      Building such a system in Boca Chica would be a red tape nightmare. When Starship moves to Florida it may get something like this. But for the time being it does not fit their rapid prototype style of development.

    • @DrPhilMM
      @DrPhilMM Год назад +1

      @@motokid6008 Agreed.
      However, SpaceX wanted to build another tower in Boca Chica.

    • @Bryan-Hensley
      @Bryan-Hensley Год назад

      Waste of money for starship. The flame trench was built so the shock waves wouldn't damage the engine. Starship engines are designed to lift off from another planet..

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад +1

      ​​@@DrPhilMM
      Are you sure that wasn't NASA and Boca Vista! 👨🏼‍🦳👵🏻😴💤 🙊 It's alright, I'm just being a cheeky monkey. NASA's water facets were always called "rainbirds" and these are the best I've seen, these are fr#@king AWESOME!

    • @DrPhilMM
      @DrPhilMM Год назад

      @@r.martin3494 I don't know what do you mean, but if you're referring to what I said about Boca Chica New tower. That's a fact, by the Army Corps of Engineers refused to grant SpaceX the approval. It asked for more detailed proposal.

  • @robertshepherd8400
    @robertshepherd8400 Год назад +4

    That's a proper launch pad... unlike the 'stool' where Musk's Starship sits.

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад +1

      Maybe that's the point but in reverse; Elon's whole concept is not slow and permanent but fast, recyclable, renewable. He's amazing and we need more like him. NASA too is the embodiment of success and stability, longevity, (though it wasn't always) as it all comes down to money in the form of relevance, timely completion, reliability, creativity and lessons learned, the hard way. For a more powerful rocket, you need a more structurally resilient pad.

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад

      Starship's astronaut's reported that the ride was vibrating so much they couldn't have seen anything had they needed to! From his tone and timing one could tell he was not only physically shaken, but also "physically shaken"! 😅
      Man! That must have been really scary wondering at which point the ship was going to fall apart or something precious fall off or fail upon return.

    • @alvianchoiriapriliansyah9882
      @alvianchoiriapriliansyah9882 10 месяцев назад

      Womp womp

    • @ihateflatearthers
      @ihateflatearthers 6 месяцев назад

      Lmao the starship pad survived 3 flights with the steel plate thing

  • @ericblanchard5873
    @ericblanchard5873 Год назад +3

    That's one way to rinse off your launch pad.
    Also, I liked my own post 😅

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад +2

      Well!!...
      ...No one can accuse you of dishonesty, Blanchard! 😅
      If it's any consolation, I like your own comment too!
      😮 D'Oh!

  • @RamData-ie9rr
    @RamData-ie9rr 10 месяцев назад

    इन लास्ट इयर

  • @GabroPlayz
    @GabroPlayz Год назад +2

    Noice

    • @r.martin3494
      @r.martin3494 Год назад +1

      If I hit "translate", your message becomes, "noise". How very appropriate for launch day! 🚀

  • @andrewheithaus1280
    @andrewheithaus1280 Год назад

    Launch pad bidet

  • @owensmith7530
    @owensmith7530 Год назад +5

    A proper water deluge system, along with a flame trench. SpaceX Super Heavy team take note, this is how to do it properly not the weak booster bidet system you have.

    • @ericblanchard5873
      @ericblanchard5873 Год назад +5

      SpaceX may not have a flame diverter, but its water deluge system is 10 times more powerful and gets to where it needs to go pretty instantly. This one took a long while to reach everywhere. All we can do is see what's what once we see what the 2nd starship launch looks like. Also, a flame deverter takes away from some liftoff. This is the main reason Elon didn't go with a traditional flame diverter.

    • @owensmith7530
      @owensmith7530 Год назад +1

      @@ericblanchard5873 Elon didn't go with a flame diverter or initially a water deluge because he thought he knew better than NASA or the Soviet space programmes and could save the cost. And for once he was completely wrong. As you say we'll find out soon enough if the booster bidet is sufficient, but it still feels like cheaping out to me.

    • @motokid6008
      @motokid6008 Год назад

      ​​​​​@@owensmith7530- Cost is one of many factors. Getting approval is another. They're already having a hard enough time with the fish and wildlife services to approve the current one. A massive deluge system and flame diverter like this would have been a red tape nightmare. Starship is also in a unique position where it may not need a large system because the vehicle is overbuilt in terms of dry mass and thus more resistant to shockwaves.

    • @Bryan-Hensley
      @Bryan-Hensley Год назад

      How do you plan on building one on the moon?

    • @Bryan-Hensley
      @Bryan-Hensley Год назад

      ​@@owensmith7530NASA didn't build the trench to protect the pad, they built a trench to keep the shock waves from destroying the engines.

  • @zetarojo1291
    @zetarojo1291 Год назад

    😒