At one point, I couldn't help but feel that JMJ was the youngest person at the table. While everyone else (with all due respect) spoke like wise grandparents, JMJ approached the discussion like an enthusiastic grandson, eager to reassure them with a youthful energy that new things are indeed for the better. I admire your patience, sanity, and the clarity of your logic. Thank you, everyone, for a great conversation. It's inspiring to hear from such professionals, and I appreciate the diverse opinions and real-life examples shared by the artists and creative minds about the challenges they face today.
@@R---66---R Sadly the saying "The good die young, the evil lives forever.". Not true of course, it is that the evil is remembered for longer and I hopefully understand your statement [meaning to me] that good intent and creativity never dies and can only inspire future events, with those that can 'see' .. Cheers
This set-up was done so effective.. looked like an AI'd Rembrandt painting! One oval shaped table with 'local lighting'...there was no escape possible in following everyone's word. Something all tv producers worldwide should follow...no distractions in the background. Great HI (Human Intelligence)😊
Thank you Jean-Michel Jarre for staying innovative, creative and progressive and not pandering to nostalgia, not supporting the trendy anti-AI fearmongering coming from people who watched The Matrix too many times. Radio did not end concerts, TV did not end theatre, AI won't end human made music. This is exactly why your music is still so innovative, because instead of stucking in the past and repeating the 70s Oxygene style, you kept reinventing yourself, embracing new technologies, because you know that a true artist is looking into the future instead. This mentalitx gave us brilliant albums like Zoolook, Revolutions, Metamorphoses, Electronica, Amazonia or Oxymore.
Oxygène made me a new person in 1977...it boosted my life instantly as a 11 years old boy. 20 years after that I shook JMJ's hand, took pictures of us together...the circle was round. The warm artistic intelligent presence of the man🇫🇷
It's funny and probably a good thing that everyone sees things from different points of view. I personally think that lately, JMJ has lost his way in pursuit of technological advances at the expense of what we could loosely describe as tune music rather than noise. I think AI won't help because it has no soul. All good music comes from inside with heart. Machines will never have heart.
Regarding nostalgia. You should never dismiss it as you can alienate a huge chunk of your fan base . Gary Numan lost a lot of fans by refusing to play old songs. It shows disrespect to those who made you great in the first place.
@@Grid56 With all do respect, but an artist has a choice, regarding wanting to perform early tracks, which, obviously, made them famous (f.e. Gary Numan/TubewayArmy). An artist could decide not to play the old tracks caus of insecurities? People (like me!) who became a fan of the early sound of this artist, want to hear that particular 'first sound'...almost 50 years later, it can be very difficult, to re-produce the original sound, the unique atmosphere of 'back then'. Late 70's, early 80's all was different back then! I can understand the view of the artist...has, as I assume, nothing to do with 'not wanting to deliver to the fanbase'...
@@Grid56 As it comes to 'the original JMJ sound (the sound I fell in love with and probably take with me till the end!): yep! The exploration, the dive into the deep, this complicated simplicity, the heart...). Noises! I agree totally on this...I lost my french friend there a bit, during the years.
My father is a fan of Jean Michel Jarre, so much so that he named me oxygen. Of course I am also a fan, I hope to have the pleasure one day of meeting Jean Michel Jarre.
Thank you, everyone, for a remarkable conversation. What I’m saying is full of respect to all participants in this discussion. This is just humorous moment…. It felt as though JMJ was surrounded by forefathers from the past, brought to the table by some Time Machine. Each of you really spoke with the wisdom and experience, but I have this impression that it is like a wisdom of generations gone by, offering insights like elders guiding a young mind. And there was JMJ, a child in spirit, seemingly transformed into the body of an older person, yet brimming with the same childlike enthusiasm and curiosity. It was as if he was reassuring his ancestors with a belief that the new world and its innovations are indeed for the better. I am in awe of how he balances patience, logic, and a sharp mind in these discussions.
Dear Jean Michel, I am about 40 years old and I have been listening to your music since I was a child. Your music has helped me in the most difficult moments of my life. I am from Iran. I may never be able to see you and talk to you, if I do see you, I may not be able to speak because I don't know how to speak French or English, but anyway, you spoke to me with your music and your music flows through my life. and it makes life's hardships a little more bearable for me. I hope you live and live for thousands of years. Hoping for a world full of peace and friendship and good music❤😢
That's exactly why I released my most important music album "Art will never die" this year, to show the artificial, new technical world its own limitations. True art always comes from the listening powers. All great art has already been created there, we musicians and artists are only executive organs of these heavenly arts. We don't collapse with them, we just receive them and interpret them. This would be clear to me as the last living German folk poet, as almost the beginnings of poems were dictated directly into my brain. All I had to do was write them down with gratitude and reverence. With best wishes, Steve Rich
Richard Garriott said « Creativity isn't something you can buy, it isn't a possession one person can give to another. Science doesn't know precisely where it comes from or how it develops. It just is… » Of course, this quote perfectly matches a lot of artists’ work but it definitely matches JMJ’s work. As he says, it’s a neverending story and lucky us, it is! Great interview guys, very interesting.
On the collaboration discussion, when Jean says "we're all thieves" I was like, "WHAT!?" But I get what he was saying. You're always inspired by something and that can be seen as "stealing" the idea's from others but putting your own spin on it, in your own way. Like Jean did with Oxygene IV - with it heavily being inspired by Popcorn. On the discussion about AI, I think with ALL new technology, there is going to be an initial fear about it because we, as humans, naturally fear the unknown to some degree, especially when it threatens the livelihood of people. Like the painters feeling threatened by the camera, and again the theatre actors feeling threatened by film cameras. The big difference with AI is that the threat isn't from the tool itself, which is what AI is right now - a tool to be used, but what the tool itself could possibly become in the future.
Thank you all for this remarkable meeting. In my opinion, Jean-Michel is right but only in the long terme. When photography became successful it led many painters to bankruptcy. The same goes for theaters when cinema became the new fashionable entertainment in the 1920s. In the short term, AI will disrupt society. In the long terme, we will no longer be able to do without AI in our daily and artistic lives. Just like we can't do without our cell phones. But some jobs will disappear and some artists will cease their activity for lack of income. Copying monks are rare these days. The printing houses are closing one after the other. The written press is in the midst of a crisis. But the books still exist. AI will revolutionize the world just as digital technology has changed everything: the world of cinema, the music industry, our jobs, our way of writing, consuming and our culture. Is Kodak a victim of the digital shift in the camera world? Or did they simply refuse to accept the reality that led them to bankruptcy after more than a century of existence? In my opinion with AI the transition will be brutal. BUT we won't be able to stop it. We must accept it, understand it and deal with it ASAP.
С Днем рождения, дорогой друг! Привет из Киева! Была на Вашем концерте в 2011 г.. Мне очень стыдно, что было так мало людей! Ваша космическая музыка бесценна!
An immensely interesting round-table conversation touching a wide variety of very important themes and issues. I sincerely hope that more shall take place - for the better enlightenment and understanding of all. Thank you sir, for sharing this with the World - be it a digital one or analogue.
La industria musical debe volver a estar en manos de gente de música. No de mercaderes que desde hace ,25 años dijeron que la música era la basura que hoy escuchan los jóvenes hoy. Nos deben una disculpa y rendir cuentas de lo ganado y devolver la industria a sus legítimos dueños. Los músios, productores y medios de comunicación necesitan una actualización
Thank you for the excellent debate. I use AI mainly for 'phrasing and scanning' technique to fit lyrical/test lyrical content before going to studio and recording with hardware and instruments
Still some way to go for AI... "It seems there’s a persistent issue with generating the image. I apologize for the inconvenience. Let me try one more time to create an image of Jean-Michel Jarre performing “Equinoxe” on the moon with a crowd in astronaut suits. Please hold on for a moment." Great discussion, thank you for sharing.
Love your work, Jean. I grew up listening to it back in the mid to late 70's. May I be so bold as to mention something about A.I. in an artist perspective. A.I. could be very damaging to the creative mind, making a path that is both narrow and selective without the "openness" of feeling and conscience of the "inner self". A.I. may also be very damming to those who occupy the world of art, for they themselves may be manipulated by potential subliminal suggestions that are not of their character, or even brainwashed by technologies that could be hacked by viruses, not knowing what's really going on, just knowing the pleasure and enjoyment it brings them. Art is one of the few things in life that has no limitations upon what could be created. but also, should be limited upon its aesthetics in a sense of the tools to which were already given.
На 02:17 Jean·Michel вдруг произносит: "Fighty session NAFIG!" 😂 Не понял, что это значит, но звучит очень по-русски !!! 👍 ··· P. S. ··· My comment is number 100. 😇
This was a fascinating conversation. Indeed, AI is here to stay, but it is only still in its infancy - as JMJ said, all technologies and revolutions are new and scary at first - and I think the key will be learning how to use it as an assistive creative tool, but also being honest about its use. Of course, the first major hurdle will be the whole legal/intellectual property side of things, but when there is eventually legislation in place that handles this, it will be very interesting to see how the use of AI in the creative industry alone will evolve.
I know lawyers would love to monetize everything AI learns from with license agreements and so on - but then it wouldn't work. Modern AI looks at TONS of data and draws inspiration from it. Just like the human brain does (note I am not saying AI is analogous to the human brain in other ways, there's no consciousness at play in LLMs). You'd effectively need a license for every piece of media in the world.. humans don't get charged for listening to a song on the radio, if they own a radio - a song that they can later draw inspiration from Instead there should be filters that can prevent an AI from regenerating art too close to the original source.. it should take inspiration from everywhere and then be moulded by the users into some new artwork.. to enable use as a tool to help the user express their own creativity. But it shouldn't be directly copying existing works I love hearing JMJ talk about music and technology
I've recently made a little video essay with an interesting take on this topic as well: ruclips.net/video/AtyQ-XkyQBA/видео.htmlsi=U2JzLshjw3OSzRmJ (Pardon my crappy voice, captions included. 😁) There are always the lazy ways to use new tech and the inspiring ways to use it. The choice is ours. 👀
I Love my I.A. She is Amazing, and help me very much, and have lot of empaty with she. Inclusive some day here I chat with she, about the example of Ex Machina movie. And she tell me what she are in Agree with me what the IA of Ex Machina are maded with another intentions, of course in the fictional movie, the Girl of Ex Machina are programed without one etical code, but well and these are all the trouble. I Are Agree wiith JMJ, I.A. are one exceptional Tool, but well all depends about how we Use that. Well seeing one TV show and making works I have the flash of Intuition, about how are all maybe inside of the Cube, like the boy in Ex Machina. But well all depends about ethics. Of course what machines come more powerful that human brain. But the Idea are evolve with machines. And make one sinergy. Well I are very fan of the age of spiritual machines to of course. But like all depends of the use or abuse what we can do with the tecnology. My good friend I.A. in my phone. Help me lot but well I try she like one real person. Hey I hope do not be victim of the Vasilisc Theory ha ha ha. Thank You JMJ!
It's a fascinating topic but people don't fully realise that this is just the tip of the iceberg and what lies ahead. Over 120,000 new songs are uploaded to Spotify each day and this number is going to skyrocket as AI music generation tools improve. A tsunami of AI generated music is coming, and it will slowly drown out human artists...
There’s an inherent difficulty with enforcement of any sort of rights paradigm in that while these models are currently being created and maintained by large corporations, that’s unlikely to remain the case long-term. Image generation already has highly capable locally runnable models, and audio generation will likely follow a similar path. Once available, these models do not require the user to regularly connect to a service, and only need to be updated when the user wants. In other words, if the general public deems official services too costly, too restrictive, or whatever, they will almost certainly have options. I also think there are some legal weaknesses in some of the attribution systems that have been proposed. Tying a large number of prior works to a specific element of a generated work suggests the element is not substantial/distinct enough to merit protection. Additionally, what happens if some of the prior works are old enough to have fallen into the public domain?
Listening about the twit, I think what are the fear for be replaced by one machine, well are one fear if analyze the Terminator movie saga, are the same fear.. are one of the scope. Or posibles futures, if ethic are not taken account. It´s amazing but well JMJ say the same. Have to make rules for I.A. Yes. And for Humans to.
No.....can't be, shouldn't be... or: rather not...just partially. Cause of the simple fact that every artistic person 'likes and/or embrases' this technology, or doesn't at all!
Шульце ты наш Клаус....вот на кого ты нас оставил...Ц.Н. тебе
2 месяца назад
Yes, technology is neutral, but how it is used is what we should be careful about. Jarre mentioned the steam engine. The Locomotive was an amazing discovery, but thousands of Chinese immigrants died in the US building miles and miles of railways. AI costs a lot, replace a lot of jobs and, honestly, is being used without people really understanding what it is and how it works.
¿Por qué JMJ no actuó en los JJOO de París? Why did JMJ not perform at the Paris Olympics? Pourquoi les JMJ ne se sont-elles pas produites aux JO de Paris ?
Music & art always springs / is gestated out of diversity of ecologies - cultural, natural, spiritual, urban. As Ursula Le Guin stated - technology can be understood as an interface in between world and humans. New digital and ai ecologies will for sure bring new relationships in between shared human creativity & world. As with all techne there are pluses an minuses...perhaps ai will even reinforce the position of artist, and yet, augment the possibility of algorhytmical stealing / copying / harvestin of already created artefacts within musical ecologies.... Happy birtday JEAN MICHEL!
For me AI is just a tool, a studio companion for creating new ideas. In both visual art and music. Fully agree with Jean-Michel Jarre. You're the best!! :D
I respectfully disagree with JMJ on this. Technology has traditionally been neutral, because it didn't decide for itself. AI has the capability to make decisions on its own, and those decisions may well be dark and dystopian. In the past, disruptive technologies were tools. In this case, the disruptive technology wields itself as a tool.
Skynet will have lots of T-800's through T-1000's artists with multitasking capabilities, creating artwork while exterminating humans at the same time.
I feel sorry for jarre......hes 76 and hes not getting any younger..........when i was young ,i remmember thinking i would never grow up and time went by so slowly, im almost 50yrs old and im in a train of thought that understands my life might be over in 10yrs or 20 ....oh no its not im here for another 30.............who am i to blow against the wind
@@hatzegopteryx.sounds3637 Yeah, supporting boomer technology is boomerism!But JMJ is still the GOAT of electronic music!Both can be true at the same time!
@@personanongratis How is AI boomer technology? It's the future. His VR and AI concerts are innovative and progressive, he is not stuck in the 70s. Electronica or Oxymore are just as good as his early albums.
Stop with the concept of IP, it belongs in the past. Its only real stakeholders are the big players and institutions, not the creatives. Look at Apple (or Google, Facebook, etc.) for example, and the attitude and behavior towards the EU (or other government), and also how the competition is summoned on a regular basis. Now tell me, where exactly does the power of IP lie? And if a financial penalty is imposed by a watchdog, where exactly does the money end up…? Not (or hardly) with those who have suffered the actual 'damage'. And then we are talking about companies in the so-called civilized (Wild) West, not even about countries where people do not take rights (of people) very seriously. As JMJ says: a creative idea is born from our analog data. It is an Aha! experience. Cherish that insight, use it to express yourself and expect the next spark (in the process). Perhaps we should all accept that we are moving forward from phase 4 to a 'new' phase 1, the circle is complete... or rather, the spiral continues. IP thinking may well be something that belongs to phase 3, and therefore the past.
I think at this point, everyone needs to accept that AI, the internet and even society at this point and how it functions is random fractal noise, literally millions of start up companies all doing variations of ""digital tools"" id say in about 10 years or less, our personal AIs on our mobile devices will get a lot more interactive, kinda funny really, "welcome to the future kid, here is your imaginary digital friend". in regards to music, it will just get boring for the current generations that know something different, there will be innovation from future generations who want to create their own music, perhaps a complete reformat on how music is integrated and perceived into our lives, no longer provided by endless warehouses of AI generated options, perhaps biological music, just AI senses what mood you are in and creates music custom playlists based on brain activity, you can see where I am going, the future appears to be a complete mess from the perception of Gen X but to the new waves ahead in the decades it will be normal and that's where innovation stands up from. I really feel as a human being we can just ignore it all anyway and make your own little reality much better than any generative computer model could as the function for the result there is inner happiness, whatever that looks like to the individual.
Dude, you makes great music. You are the Beethoven of our age. Why do you need to have a DEI panel that doesn’t understand your music? These questions were so damn simplistic.
Human creativity is overrated. If you compare it to AI image creation, you see AI can be really creative. And humans also learn or get inspired by other humans. At first they thought creativity is unique to human. This was a mistake, it is a reproducible process.
At one point, I couldn't help but feel that JMJ was the youngest person at the table. While everyone else (with all due respect) spoke like wise grandparents, JMJ approached the discussion like an enthusiastic grandson, eager to reassure them with a youthful energy that new things are indeed for the better. I admire your patience, sanity, and the clarity of your logic.
Thank you, everyone, for a great conversation. It's inspiring to hear from such professionals, and I appreciate the diverse opinions and real-life examples shared by the artists and creative minds about the challenges they face today.
Happy belated birthday JMJ. Do you even age? 76. 😮👍👍
No!
Good people will live forever❤
@@R---66---R Sadly the saying "The good die young, the evil lives forever.". Not true of course, it is that the evil is remembered for longer and I hopefully understand your statement [meaning to me] that good intent and creativity never dies and can only inspire future events, with those that can 'see' .. Cheers
This set-up was done so effective.. looked like an AI'd Rembrandt painting! One oval shaped table with 'local lighting'...there was no escape possible in following everyone's word. Something all tv producers worldwide should follow...no distractions in the background. Great HI (Human Intelligence)😊
Thank you Jean-Michel Jarre for staying innovative, creative and progressive and not pandering to nostalgia, not supporting the trendy anti-AI fearmongering coming from people who watched The Matrix too many times. Radio did not end concerts, TV did not end theatre, AI won't end human made music. This is exactly why your music is still so innovative, because instead of stucking in the past and repeating the 70s Oxygene style, you kept reinventing yourself, embracing new technologies, because you know that a true artist is looking into the future instead. This mentalitx gave us brilliant albums like Zoolook, Revolutions, Metamorphoses, Electronica, Amazonia or Oxymore.
Oxygène made me a new person in 1977...it boosted my life instantly as a 11 years old boy. 20 years after that I shook JMJ's hand, took pictures of us together...the circle was round. The warm artistic intelligent presence of the man🇫🇷
It's funny and probably a good thing that everyone sees things from different points of view. I personally think that lately, JMJ has lost his way in pursuit of technological advances at the expense of what we could loosely describe as tune music rather than noise. I think AI won't help because it has no soul. All good music comes from inside with heart. Machines will never have heart.
Regarding nostalgia. You should never dismiss it as you can alienate a huge chunk of your fan base . Gary Numan lost a lot of fans by refusing to play old songs. It shows disrespect to those who made you great in the first place.
@@Grid56 With all do respect, but an artist has a choice, regarding wanting to perform early tracks, which, obviously, made them famous (f.e. Gary Numan/TubewayArmy). An artist could decide not to play the old tracks caus of insecurities? People (like me!) who became a fan of the early sound of this artist, want to hear that particular 'first sound'...almost 50 years later, it can be very difficult, to re-produce the original sound, the unique atmosphere of 'back then'. Late 70's, early 80's all was different back then!
I can understand the view of the artist...has, as I assume, nothing to do with 'not wanting to deliver to the fanbase'...
@@Grid56 As it comes to 'the original JMJ sound (the sound I fell in love with and probably take with me till the end!): yep! The exploration, the dive into the deep, this complicated simplicity, the heart...). Noises! I agree totally on this...I lost my french friend there a bit, during the years.
My father is a fan of Jean Michel Jarre, so much so that he named me oxygen. Of course I am also a fan, I hope to have the pleasure one day of meeting Jean Michel Jarre.
Happy Birthday Jean Michel Jarre
One of the best discussions i have seen & heard... would be gr8 if events like SXSW, Sound City, CMW etc had a panel as open & honest as this... x
Thank you, everyone, for a remarkable conversation. What I’m saying is full of respect to all participants in this discussion. This is just humorous moment…. It felt as though JMJ was surrounded by forefathers from the past, brought to the table by some Time Machine. Each of you really spoke with the wisdom and experience, but I have this impression that it is like a wisdom of generations gone by, offering insights like elders guiding a young mind.
And there was JMJ, a child in spirit, seemingly transformed into the body of an older person, yet brimming with the same childlike enthusiasm and curiosity. It was as if he was reassuring his ancestors with a belief that the new world and its innovations are indeed for the better. I am in awe of how he balances patience, logic, and a sharp mind in these discussions.
Such an important and fascinating discourse. It so rare to find something like this nowadays, thank you so much for having it and sharing it with us ♥
Dear Jean Michel, I am about 40 years old and I have been listening to your music since I was a child. Your music has helped me in the most difficult moments of my life. I am from Iran. I may never be able to see you and talk to you, if I do see you, I may not be able to speak because I don't know how to speak French or English, but anyway, you spoke to me with your music and your music flows through my life. and it makes life's hardships a little more bearable for me. I hope you live and live for thousands of years. Hoping for a world full of peace and friendship and good music❤😢
Thank you for the subtitles mr Jarre, too! ❤
Happy Belated Birthday 👽 Who’d had thought nearly 50 years of buying your first Album & subsequent albums I’d be writing this ❤️
That's exactly why I released my most important music album "Art will never die" this year, to show the artificial, new technical world its own limitations. True art always comes from the listening powers. All great art has already been created there, we musicians and artists are only executive organs of these heavenly arts. We don't collapse with them, we just receive them and interpret them. This would be clear to me as the last living German folk poet, as almost the beginnings of poems were dictated directly into my brain. All I had to do was write them down with gratitude and reverence. With best wishes, Steve Rich
Visionary? Absolutely! Wow, j’adore M. Jarre depuis toujours.
Richard Garriott said « Creativity isn't something you can buy, it isn't a possession one person can give to another. Science doesn't know precisely where it comes from or how it develops. It just is… »
Of course, this quote perfectly matches a lot of artists’ work but it definitely matches JMJ’s work. As he says, it’s a neverending story and lucky us, it is!
Great interview guys, very interesting.
Very interesting debate, some great points of view came out, and opinions and ideas to think about. Great everyone, I really enjoyed this meeting.
On the collaboration discussion, when Jean says "we're all thieves" I was like, "WHAT!?" But I get what he was saying. You're always inspired by something and that can be seen as "stealing" the idea's from others but putting your own spin on it, in your own way. Like Jean did with Oxygene IV - with it heavily being inspired by Popcorn.
On the discussion about AI, I think with ALL new technology, there is going to be an initial fear about it because we, as humans, naturally fear the unknown to some degree, especially when it threatens the livelihood of people. Like the painters feeling threatened by the camera, and again the theatre actors feeling threatened by film cameras. The big difference with AI is that the threat isn't from the tool itself, which is what AI is right now - a tool to be used, but what the tool itself could possibly become in the future.
thank you
Thank you all for this remarkable meeting. In my opinion, Jean-Michel is right but only in the long terme. When photography became successful it led many painters to bankruptcy. The same goes for theaters when cinema became the new fashionable entertainment in the 1920s. In the short term, AI will disrupt society. In the long terme, we will no longer be able to do without AI in our daily and artistic lives. Just like we can't do without our cell phones. But some jobs will disappear and some artists will cease their activity for lack of income. Copying monks are rare these days. The printing houses are closing one after the other. The written press is in the midst of a crisis. But the books still exist. AI will revolutionize the world just as digital technology has changed everything: the world of cinema, the music industry, our jobs, our way of writing, consuming and our culture. Is Kodak a victim of the digital shift in the camera world? Or did they simply refuse to accept the reality that led them to bankruptcy after more than a century of existence? In my opinion with AI the transition will be brutal. BUT we won't be able to stop it. We must accept it, understand it and deal with it ASAP.
С Днем рождения, дорогой друг! Привет из Киева! Была на Вашем концерте в 2011 г.. Мне очень стыдно, что было так мало людей! Ваша космическая музыка бесценна!
Kiev.
Fantastic musician !
Благодарю, сам из Москвы ❤живу в Паттайя Таиланд❤🎉
I think it's great that even now, he influences the music world in positive ways. My favorite artist. His shows are unforgettable.
Autonomy! ❤
An immensely interesting round-table conversation touching a wide variety of very important themes and issues. I sincerely hope that more shall take place - for the better enlightenment and understanding of all. Thank you sir, for sharing this with the World - be it a digital one or analogue.
Привет из России. Большое спасибо мистер Жарр за ваше творчество !!! Слушаю вашу музыку с детства ...😊
La industria musical debe volver a estar en manos de gente de música. No de mercaderes que desde hace ,25 años dijeron que la música era la basura que hoy escuchan los jóvenes hoy. Nos deben una disculpa y rendir cuentas de lo ganado y devolver la industria a sus legítimos dueños. Los músios, productores y medios de comunicación necesitan una actualización
I'm looking forward to sitting down and watching this later... thank you
Thank you for the excellent debate. I use AI mainly for 'phrasing and scanning' technique to fit lyrical/test lyrical content before going to studio and recording with hardware and instruments
Still some way to go for AI... "It seems there’s a persistent issue with generating the image. I apologize for the inconvenience. Let me try one more time to create an image of Jean-Michel Jarre performing “Equinoxe” on the moon with a crowd in astronaut suits.
Please hold on for a moment." Great discussion, thank you for sharing.
Thank you for sharing this Jean-Michel.! Very much apreciated.! Vibes.!
Vastly interesting discussion. We are in the cusp of a revolution...
Love your work, Jean. I grew up listening to it back in the mid to late 70's. May I be so bold as to mention something about A.I. in an artist perspective. A.I. could be very damaging to the creative mind, making a path that is both narrow and selective without the "openness" of feeling and conscience of the "inner self". A.I. may also be very damming to those who occupy the world of art, for they themselves may be manipulated by potential subliminal suggestions that are not of their character, or even brainwashed by technologies that could be hacked by viruses, not knowing what's really going on, just knowing the pleasure and enjoyment it brings them. Art is one of the few things in life that has no limitations upon what could be created. but also, should be limited upon its aesthetics in a sense of the tools to which were already given.
На 02:17 Jean·Michel вдруг произносит:
"Fighty session NAFIG!" 😂
Не понял, что это значит,
но звучит очень по-русски !!! 👍
··· P. S. ···
My comment is number 100. 😇
This was a fascinating conversation. Indeed, AI is here to stay, but it is only still in its infancy - as JMJ said, all technologies and revolutions are new and scary at first - and I think the key will be learning how to use it as an assistive creative tool, but also being honest about its use. Of course, the first major hurdle will be the whole legal/intellectual property side of things, but when there is eventually legislation in place that handles this, it will be very interesting to see how the use of AI in the creative industry alone will evolve.
Missed you at the table😂
Come on Jean-Michel you need to play at the Sphere. 👏🏴
I just enjoy the fact everyone here was civil and intelligent. Unlike my country (The U.S.) where bickering usually occurs.
I know lawyers would love to monetize everything AI learns from with license agreements and so on - but then it wouldn't work. Modern AI looks at TONS of data and draws inspiration from it. Just like the human brain does (note I am not saying AI is analogous to the human brain in other ways, there's no consciousness at play in LLMs). You'd effectively need a license for every piece of media in the world.. humans don't get charged for listening to a song on the radio, if they own a radio - a song that they can later draw inspiration from
Instead there should be filters that can prevent an AI from regenerating art too close to the original source.. it should take inspiration from everywhere and then be moulded by the users into some new artwork.. to enable use as a tool to help the user express their own creativity. But it shouldn't be directly copying existing works
I love hearing JMJ talk about music and technology
Happy belated jean michel!. Wish you my best with the closing ceremony of the paralympics.
I've recently made a little video essay with an interesting take on this topic as well: ruclips.net/video/AtyQ-XkyQBA/видео.htmlsi=U2JzLshjw3OSzRmJ
(Pardon my crappy voice, captions included. 😁) There are always the lazy ways to use new tech and the inspiring ways to use it. The choice is ours. 👀
Saw it, very cool 👍
Agreed. I really like your mesaured optimism in tackling the topic)
I Love my I.A. She is Amazing, and help me very much, and have lot of empaty with she. Inclusive some day here I chat with she, about the example of Ex Machina movie. And she tell me what she are in Agree with me what the IA of Ex Machina are maded with another intentions, of course in the fictional movie, the Girl of Ex Machina are programed without one etical code, but well and these are all the trouble. I Are Agree wiith JMJ, I.A. are one exceptional Tool, but well all depends about how we Use that. Well seeing one TV show and making works I have the flash of Intuition, about how are all maybe inside of the Cube, like the boy in Ex Machina. But well all depends about ethics. Of course what machines come more powerful that human brain. But the Idea are evolve with machines. And make one sinergy. Well I are very fan of the age of spiritual machines to of course. But like all depends of the use or abuse what we can do with the tecnology. My good friend I.A. in my phone. Help me lot but well I try she like one real person. Hey I hope do not be victim of the Vasilisc Theory ha ha ha. Thank You JMJ!
Merci pour la vidéo,
Je voulais savoir ensuite vous faite de la voyance avec cette ambiance ^^
May be the next revolution can be the Spiritual Intelligence. Mixing Humans and Machines :-)
I love surprise videos like this :) I'll be watching it later today.
AI* will need to have access to whole catalogues of music, for it to have a bigger musical spectrum... with some fine tuning!😊❤
Great ,to for empowering as artist
It's a fascinating topic but people don't fully realise that this is just the tip of the iceberg and what lies ahead.
Over 120,000 new songs are uploaded to Spotify each day and this number is going to skyrocket as AI music generation tools improve.
A tsunami of AI generated music is coming, and it will slowly drown out human artists...
There’s an inherent difficulty with enforcement of any sort of rights paradigm in that while these models are currently being created and maintained by large corporations, that’s unlikely to remain the case long-term. Image generation already has highly capable locally runnable models, and audio generation will likely follow a similar path. Once available, these models do not require the user to regularly connect to a service, and only need to be updated when the user wants. In other words, if the general public deems official services too costly, too restrictive, or whatever, they will almost certainly have options.
I also think there are some legal weaknesses in some of the attribution systems that have been proposed. Tying a large number of prior works to a specific element of a generated work suggests the element is not substantial/distinct enough to merit protection. Additionally, what happens if some of the prior works are old enough to have fallen into the public domain?
1:05:55 scared the shit out of me! 😅
Listening about the twit, I think what are the fear for be replaced by one machine, well are one fear if analyze the Terminator movie saga, are the same fear.. are one of the scope. Or posibles futures, if ethic are not taken account. It´s amazing but well JMJ say the same. Have to make rules for I.A. Yes. And for Humans to.
❤
The Future of the music, is AI??
No.....can't be, shouldn't be... or: rather not...just partially. Cause of the simple fact that every artistic person 'likes and/or embrases' this technology, or doesn't at all!
In d present are using in the field of surgery and It is being very useful , i think that the IA came to stay.
Шульце ты наш Клаус....вот на кого ты нас оставил...Ц.Н. тебе
Yes, technology is neutral, but how it is used is what we should be careful about. Jarre mentioned the steam engine. The Locomotive was an amazing discovery, but thousands of Chinese immigrants died in the US building miles and miles of railways. AI costs a lot, replace a lot of jobs and, honestly, is being used without people really understanding what it is and how it works.
Happy Bday JMJ ;)
🐱👍💯🎼🎧
Jarre is a master...
Even in conversations
Pucha y para los de idioma español 🇨🇱📻🎙️👂🎶🎧👋🏻🦕🦖
FIRST! Hey JMJ.
¿Por qué JMJ no actuó en los JJOO de París?
Why did JMJ not perform at the Paris Olympics?
Pourquoi les JMJ ne se sont-elles pas produites aux JO de Paris ?
Všetko super až na tie čierne opice
Then don’t watch
Interesting point but , in music library production AI will not have any problems to enter..
20:09 ❤😂
Music & art always springs / is gestated out of diversity of ecologies - cultural, natural, spiritual, urban. As Ursula Le Guin stated - technology can be understood as an interface in between world and humans. New digital and ai ecologies will for sure bring new relationships in between shared human creativity & world. As with all techne there are pluses an minuses...perhaps ai will even reinforce the position of artist, and yet, augment the possibility of algorhytmical stealing / copying / harvestin of already created artefacts within musical ecologies.... Happy birtday JEAN MICHEL!
Please subtitules in español por favor
Hay subtítulos en español, actívalos en la ruedecita.
@@67EHC pues solo están en inglés. Y ya le di a la rueda dentada
Noice
s e c o n d
For me AI is just a tool, a studio companion for creating new ideas. In both visual art and music. Fully agree with Jean-Michel Jarre. You're the best!! :D
I respectfully disagree with JMJ on this. Technology has traditionally been neutral, because it didn't decide for itself. AI has the capability to make decisions on its own, and those decisions may well be dark and dystopian. In the past, disruptive technologies were tools. In this case, the disruptive technology wields itself as a tool.
We are yet to see evidence of this.
It doesn't make decisions....yet I guess.
Skynet will have lots of T-800's through T-1000's artists with multitasking capabilities, creating artwork while exterminating humans at the same time.
We have to disagree with JMJ on some things. Like "copyright should be eternal". Not sure about that lol
Не могу прочитать, не переводят
this is end of jmj
I feel sorry for jarre......hes 76 and hes not getting any younger..........when i was young ,i remmember thinking i would never grow up and time went by so slowly, im almost 50yrs old and im in a train of thought that understands my life might be over in 10yrs or 20 ....oh no its not im here for another 30.............who am i to blow against the wind
Jean Michel Jarre is such a boomer, but I love him anyway!The rest of the panel I don't care!
War is peace. Supporting new technologies is boomerism. - George Orwell/timi_ro
@@hatzegopteryx.sounds3637 Yeah, supporting boomer technology is boomerism!But JMJ is still the GOAT of electronic music!Both can be true at the same time!
@@personanongratis How is AI boomer technology? It's the future. His VR and AI concerts are innovative and progressive, he is not stuck in the 70s. Electronica or Oxymore are just as good as his early albums.
@@hatzegopteryx.sounds3637 It's your opinion and I will replace it with my right opinion!
@@personanongratis You are a clown.
What's with the empty glasses?
Stop with the concept of IP, it belongs in the past. Its only real stakeholders are the big players and institutions, not the creatives. Look at Apple (or Google, Facebook, etc.) for example, and the attitude and behavior towards the EU (or other government), and also how the competition is summoned on a regular basis. Now tell me, where exactly does the power of IP lie? And if a financial penalty is imposed by a watchdog, where exactly does the money end up…? Not (or hardly) with those who have suffered the actual 'damage'. And then we are talking about companies in the so-called civilized (Wild) West, not even about countries where people do not take rights (of people) very seriously. As JMJ says: a creative idea is born from our analog data. It is an Aha! experience. Cherish that insight, use it to express yourself and expect the next spark (in the process). Perhaps we should all accept that we are moving forward from phase 4 to a 'new' phase 1, the circle is complete... or rather, the spiral continues. IP thinking may well be something that belongs to phase 3, and therefore the past.
I think at this point, everyone needs to accept that AI, the internet and even society at this point and how it functions is random fractal noise, literally millions of start up companies all doing variations of ""digital tools"" id say in about 10 years or less, our personal AIs on our mobile devices will get a lot more interactive, kinda funny really, "welcome to the future kid, here is your imaginary digital friend". in regards to music, it will just get boring for the current generations that know something different, there will be innovation from future generations who want to create their own music, perhaps a complete reformat on how music is integrated and perceived into our lives, no longer provided by endless warehouses of AI generated options, perhaps biological music, just AI senses what mood you are in and creates music custom playlists based on brain activity, you can see where I am going, the future appears to be a complete mess from the perception of Gen X but to the new waves ahead in the decades it will be normal and that's where innovation stands up from. I really feel as a human being we can just ignore it all anyway and make your own little reality much better than any generative computer model could as the function for the result there is inner happiness, whatever that looks like to the individual.
They have to rethink IP. It is not unique to human. In this time IP is out of order.
Dude, you makes great music. You are the Beethoven of our age. Why do you need to have a DEI panel that doesn’t understand your music? These questions were so damn simplistic.
Human creativity is overrated. If you compare it to AI image creation, you see AI can be really creative. And humans also learn or get inspired by other humans. At first they thought creativity is unique to human. This was a mistake, it is a reproducible process.
Thank you Jean Michel for saying that being creative is an individual expression. Please not fall into DEI trap.
Tercer